Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Quasi-synchronization of nonlinear systems with parameter mismatch and time-varying delays via event-triggered impulsive control

  • This paper investigated the quasi-synchronization of nonlinear systems with parameter mismatch and time-varying delays via the event-triggered impulsive control (ETIC) approach, which integrates impulsive control and event-triggered control. The instances of impulsive activation were determined by an event-triggered mechanism based on a particular condition that depends on the system states. By employing the comparison principle for impulsive systems and the formula for variable parameters, we established the exact synchronization error bound and derived sufficient conditions for achieving quasi-synchronization. Furthermore, we proved the absence of Zeno behavior in the controlled system under the ETIC mechanism. Finally, we gave an example to verify that the theoretical results are valid under the proposed ETIC strategy.

    Citation: Biwen Li, Yujie Liu. Quasi-synchronization of nonlinear systems with parameter mismatch and time-varying delays via event-triggered impulsive control[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3759-3778. doi: 10.3934/math.2025174

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ihtisham Ul Haq, Shabir Ahmad, Sayed Saifullah, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Ali Akgül . Analysis of fractal fractional Lorenz type and financial chaotic systems with exponential decay kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18809-18823. doi: 10.3934/math.20221035
    [2] A. E. Matouk . Chaos and hidden chaos in a 4D dynamical system using the fractal-fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 6233-6257. doi: 10.3934/math.2025284
    [3] Anastacia Dlamini, Emile F. Doungmo Goufo, Melusi Khumalo . On the Caputo-Fabrizio fractal fractional representation for the Lorenz chaotic system. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12395-12421. doi: 10.3934/math.2021717
    [4] Rabha W. Ibrahim, Dumitru Baleanu . Global stability of local fractional Hénon-Lozi map using fixed point theory. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 11399-11416. doi: 10.3934/math.2022636
    [5] Sonal Jain, Youssef El-Khatib . Modelling chaotic dynamical attractor with fractal-fractional differential operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13689-13725. doi: 10.3934/math.2021795
    [6] Muhammad Farman, Aqeel Ahmad, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Umer Saleem, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Velusamy Vijayakumar . Dynamical behavior of tumor-immune system with fractal-fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8751-8773. doi: 10.3934/math.2022489
    [7] Emile Franc Doungmo Goufo, Abdon Atangana . On three dimensional fractal dynamics with fractional inputs and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1982-2000. doi: 10.3934/math.2022114
    [8] Aziz Khan, Thabet Abdeljawad, Manar A. Alqudah . Neural networking study of worms in a wireless sensor model in the sense of fractal fractional. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26406-26424. doi: 10.3934/math.20231348
    [9] Amir Ali, Abid Ullah Khan, Obaid Algahtani, Sayed Saifullah . Semi-analytical and numerical computation of fractal-fractional sine-Gordon equation with non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14975-14990. doi: 10.3934/math.2022820
    [10] Cemil Tunç, Alireza Khalili Golmankhaneh . On stability of a class of second alpha-order fractal differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2126-2142. doi: 10.3934/math.2020141
  • This paper investigated the quasi-synchronization of nonlinear systems with parameter mismatch and time-varying delays via the event-triggered impulsive control (ETIC) approach, which integrates impulsive control and event-triggered control. The instances of impulsive activation were determined by an event-triggered mechanism based on a particular condition that depends on the system states. By employing the comparison principle for impulsive systems and the formula for variable parameters, we established the exact synchronization error bound and derived sufficient conditions for achieving quasi-synchronization. Furthermore, we proved the absence of Zeno behavior in the controlled system under the ETIC mechanism. Finally, we gave an example to verify that the theoretical results are valid under the proposed ETIC strategy.



    The World Health Organization [1] regards the online game addiction (OGA) as a new disease. The general defining feature of this disease is "persistent and recurrent use of the internet to engage in games, often with other players, leading to clinically significant impairment or distress" (see [2]). OGA is often an addictive mental disease. People with OGA tend to be impulsive, violent, misanthropic and withdrawn. As the number of internet users continues to increase, the number of people addicted to online games, especially children, is also growing. The research on OGA has attracted wide attention. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [3,4] proposed some classification criteria for OGA. To better cure and reduce the population of OGA, scholars from all walks of life began to study it from various perspectives. One of the important research methods to reveal the dynamic behavior of OGA is using mathematical models. In recent years, some mathematical workers have made use of various mathematical theories and methods to study the OGA problem. For example, Li and Guo [5,6] studied the stability and optimal control of two kinds of OGA mathematical models. Viriyapong and Sookpiam [7] discussed the stability and qualitative behavior of an OGA model for children and youth in Thailand. Therefore, we try to apply a differential equation model to study the OGA problem in this manuscript.

    Inspired by the previous works [5,6,7,8] in terms of population division of online gamers, based on the ideas and methods of the papers [9,10,11,12,13], we put forward a mathematical model to describe the changes and interactions of population density with OGA under unsustainable treatment as follows:

    {dU(τ)dτ=raU(τ)bU(τ)V(τ),dV(τ)dτ=bU(τ)V(τ)βΘ(τ)V(τ), (1.1)

    where U(τ) and V(τ) stand for the population densities of moderate gamers and addictive gamers at time τ, respectively. r stands for the proportion coefficient of population density of new gamers. aU(τ) is the population density of stopping gaming for moderate gamers through self-control. bU(τ)V(τ) indicates the number of population density converted from moderate gamers to addictive gamers. βΘ(τ)V(τ) measures the unsustainable treatment for an addictive gamer. r,a,b,β>0 are some constants.

    As we all know, the number of moderate and addictive gamers not only depends on time variables τ, but also often shows a certain diffusion in space. Therefore, we modify the system (1.1) to the following diffusion partial differential equation model:

    {U(τ,)τ=d1ΔU(τ,)+raU(τ,)bU(τ,)V(τ,),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,V(τ,)τ=d2ΔV(τ,)+bU(τ,)V(τ,)βΘ(τ,)V(τ,),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω, (1.2)

    where the practical meanings of U(τ,), V(τ,), r, aU(τ,), bU(τ,)V(τ,) and βΘ(τ,)V(τ,) are the same as in system (1.1). di>0(i=1,2) is the diffusion coefficient. Δ is the Laplacian. ΩR is bounded, and its boundary Ω is smooth. The unsustainable treatment function Θ(τ,) has the following characteristics:

    (A1) Θ(τ,) is piecewise continuous with respect to τ[0,), that is, Θ(τ,) is continuous in the interval I[0,)B, where B={τk[0,):Θ(τk,)<Θ(τ+k,)} is countable. For any compact subset of [0,), Θ(τ,) has a finite number of discontinuities. For all τ1,τ2[0,), Θ(τ1,)Θ(τ2,) provided that τ1<τ2. 0<γΘ(τ,), and Θ(0,)=Θ(0+,)=γ.

    To study the dynamic behavior of model (1.2), the following initial and boundary conditions are necessary:

    {U(τ,)n=V(τ,)n=0,(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,U(0,)=U0(),V(0,)=V0(),xΩ, (1.3)

    where n is the outward normal vector of Ω. The initial values U0() and V0() satisfy the below assumption:

    (A2) For xΩ, U0(),V0()>0, and U0(),V0()L(Ω).

    It is similar to [14,15] that the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) is rewritten of the form

    {U(τ,)τd1ΔU(τ,)=raU(τ,)bU(τ,)V(τ,),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,V(τ,)τd2ΔV(τ,)bU(τ,)V(τ,)β¯[Θ(τ,)]V(τ,),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,U(τ,)n=V(τ,)n=0,(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,U(0,)=U0(),V(0,)=V0(),xΩ, (1.4)

    where ¯[Θ(τ,)]=[Θ(τ,),Θ(τ+,)], Θ(τ,)=limττΘ(τ,), Θ(τ+,)=limττ+Θ(τ,). Obviously, ¯[Θ(τ,)]=Θ(τk,) provided that Θ(τ,) is continuous at τ=τk.

    This paper mainly studies the well-posedness and stability of the solution of the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) with the help of (1.4). The principal illuminating points of our research work are as below:

    (i) By analyzing the mechanism of OGA and considering the unsustainable treatment, we establish a new ordinary differential equation model (1.1). Considering that the population of gamers has a certain diffusion in space, we propose a novel diffusion partial differential equation model (1.2).

    (ii) We first convert the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) into differential inclusion (1.4). Next, we study the boundness and existence of solutions to the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3). Meanwhile, we build some Lyapunov type functionals and prove the global stability of the model. Finally, an example is numerically simulated and analyzed using MATLAB. The numerical simulation is in good agreement with the theoretical results.

    (iii) The major outcomes of the paper provide theoretical help for the research and treatment of online game addiction. Our work provides an example for applying mathematical theories and methods to solve social problems such as online game addiction, which makes the study of this kind of problem transform from the qualitative to the quantitative.

    The paper's remaining structure is as follows. In Section 2, we prove that the model has bounded solutions. In Section 3, the global stability of the steady states of the model is studied. A numerical example and simulation are given in Section 4. Finally, a brief summary is made in Section 5.

    Definition 2.1. Let ϕ1(U,V)=raUbUV, ϕ2(U,V)=bUVβ¯[Θ(τ,)]V. (U,V) is a solution of (1.4) if and only if, for U,VC([0,σ],H), Λ1(U,V)L1([0,σ],H), Λ2(U,V)ϕ2(U,V) within (0,σ) satisfying that (U,V) is a solution in (0,σ) of the following equation:

    {U(τ,)τd1ΔU=Λ1(U,V),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,V(τ,)τd2ΔV=Λ2(U,V),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,U(0,)=U0()>0,V(0,)=V0()>0,xΩ. (2.1)

    Set Y=C([0,σ],H)×C([0,σ],H) and define W=(U,V)TY, and then Eq (2.1) is rewritten by

    {dWdt=L(W)+F(W),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,W(0,)=W0()>(0,0),xΩ, (2.2)

    where the operators L and F are defined as

    L(W)=(d1ΔUd2ΔV),F(W)=(Λ1(U,V)Λ2(U,V)).

    The solution of (2.2) is formulated by

    W(τ)=T(τ)W0+τ0T(τs)F(W(s))ds,

    where T(τ)=(T1(τ),T2(τ))T, and T1(τ) and T2(τ) are compact and strong C0-semigroup induced by d1Δ and d2Δ with U(τ,)n=V(τ,)n=0, respectively.

    Theorem 2.1. Assume that (A1) and (A2) are true. Then, for any solution W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,)) of system (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3), there exist the constants N1,N2>0, such that N1U(τ,),V(τ,)N2, (τ,x)[0,)×Ω.

    Proof. Taking L1=min{βb, minxΩU0()}, L+1=max{β(γ+1)b, maxxΩU0()}, L2=min{raL1bL1, minxΩV0()} and L+2=max{rbL1, maxxΩV0()}, we define R by

    R={(U,V):L1UL+1,L2VL+2}. (2.3)

    Obviously, W0()=(U0(),V0())TR. It is similar to [16] that T(t)W0()R. Define a vector field

    F=(ϕ1(U,V),ϕ2(U,V))=(raUbUV,bUVβ¯[Θ(τ,)]V). (2.4)

    On the left of R, choosing U=L1, L2VL+2, one derives from (2.3) and (2.4) that

    raUbUV=raL1bL1v>raL1bL1L+20. (2.5)

    On the right of R, taking U=L+1, L2VL+2, it is similar to (2.5) that

    raUbUV=raL+1bL+1v<raL+1bL+1L20. (2.6)

    On the below of R, associating with (2.3), (2.4), (A1) and (A2), letting V=L2, L1UL+1, 0<γΘ(τ,), we have

    bUVβ¯[Θ(τ,)]V=buL2β¯[Θ(τ,)]L2>bL1L2βL20. (2.7)

    On the above of R, choosing V=L+2, L1UL+1, 0<γΘ(τ,), we similarly obtain

    bUVβ¯[Θ(τ,)]V=buL+2β¯[Θ(τ,)]L+2<bL+1L+2β(γ+1)L+20. (2.8)

    From (2.5)–(2.8), similar to [16,17], one knows that R is the invariant set of F. Thereby, taking N1=min{L1,L2}, N2=max{L+1,L+2}, one has N1U(τ,),V(τ,)N2, (τ,x)[0,)×Ω. The proof is completed. To prove the existence of solutions, we need the below fixed point theorem.

    Lemma 2.1. [18,19] Let K be a nonempty and weakly compact subset in a real Hilbertspace H and let E:KP(K) be such that for each uK, E(u) is closed and convex. If the graph Graf(E) of E is weakly × weakly sequentially closed, then E has at least one fixedpoint, i.e., there exists at least one element uK such that uE(u).

    Definition 2.2. [20] Let X be a Lebesgue measurable subset in Rq, q1, and E:XP(H) be a mapping. A function f:XH is called a selection of E if f(z)E(z) a.e. zX. The set of all the measurable selections of E is denoted by Sel(E).

    Theorem 2.2. The model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) has at least one solution W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,))C([0,),H)×C([0,),H), for (τ,x)[0,)×Ω, provided that (A1) and (A2) are true.

    Proof. Our proof is thanks to [20,21]. We first prove that the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) has at least a solution W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,))Y. In fact, from Theorem 2.1 together with (A1) and (A2), one knows that there exist some constants M,R>0 such that max{UH,VH}M, and for all (x,y)(ϕ1(U,V),ϕ2(U,V)), max{UH,VH}M+1 implies that max{xH,yH}R+1. Let

    K={(Λ1,Λ2):Λ1,Λ2L2([0,σ],H),Λ1L2([0,σ],H)R+1,Λ2L2([0,σ],H)R+1}.

    K is nonempty and weakly compact in L2([0,σ],H)×L2([0,σ],H). Define Pσ:KY as

    Pσ(Λ1,Λ2)=(U,V),

    where (U,V) is the unique solution on [0,σ] of (2.1). Adopting fallacy reduction, one easily verifies that max{UHVH}M+1. Define the operator E:KP(K) as

    (Λ1,Λ2)Sel(ϕ1(U,V))×Sel(ϕ2(U,V)),

    where Pσ(Λ1,Λ2)=(U,V). From Theorem 3.4 of [22], Theorem 2.3.3 of [23], Proposition 3.6 of [22] and Theorem 3.3 of [21], we know that the graph Graf(E) of E is weakly × weakly sequentially closed in K. It follows from Lemma 1 that there is (Λ1,Λ2)K such that (Λ1,Λ2)E((Λ1,Λ2)), and consequently Pσ(Λ1,Λ2)=(U,V) is a weak solution of (2.1). Since (Λ1,Λ2)L2([0,σ],H)×L2([0,σ],H), Theorem 3.6 of [22] ensures that Pσ(Λ1,Λ2)=(U,V) is in fact a strong solution of (2.1).

    Next, we need to show that this strong solution W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,)) of (2.1) defined on [0,). Indeed, according to the continuation theorem, the maximum existence interval of solution of the strong solution W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,)) is a form of [0,σ). Assume that σ<, we derive from [24] that

    limτσmax{U(τ,)L(Ω),V(τ,)L(Ω)}=,xL2(Ω),

    which contradicts he boundedness of W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,)). Thus, the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) has a strong solution W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,)) on [0,). The proof is completed.

    It is easy to see that the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) has two steady states S=(U0,V0)=(ra,0) and S+=(U+,V+) determined by

    0=raUbUV,0bUVβ¯[Θ(τ,)]V. (3.1)

    In light of (3.1), we obtain h(V)rbβ(a+bV)=¯[Θ(τ,)]=[Θ(τ,),Θ(τ+,)], and the steady state S+=(U+,V+) is represented by U+=βΘb, V+=rbaβΘbβΘ, where Θ¯[Θ(τ,)]. Next, we shall discuss the global asymptotic stability of steady states S and S+ in R.

    Theorem 3.1. The semi-positive steady state S of the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) possesses global asymptotic stability in R, provided that rb<aβγ.

    Proof. Clearly, the steady state S is semi-positive. Build a functional

    V(τ)=Ω[U(τ,x)raralnaU(τ,x)r+V(τ,x)]dx,(U,V)R. (3.2)

    Obviously, V(τ) is smooth. Let g(U)=UraralnaUr, and then g(U)=1raU, which implies that g(U)g(ra)=0. Thus, we have V(τ)>0 for all τ0 and V(0)=0. Moreover, according to [15], one knows that the set {τR:V(τ)α} is bounded for α0. Define G(U,V) as

    G(U,V)=(d1ΔU+raUbUVd2ΔV+bUVβ¯[Θ(τ,)]V).

    From (1.2), (A1) and (A2), one knows that the set-valued map G(U,V) is upper semi-continuous and non-empty compact convex. For any ζ=(ζ1,ζ2)TG(U,V), there is a Θ¯[Θ(τ,)] such that

    ζ=(ζ1ζ2)=(d1ΔU+raUbUVd2ΔV+bUVβΘV).

    From (3.2), one calculates (VU,VV)ζ as

    dVdτ=Ω[(1raU)Ut+Vt]dx=Ω[(1raU)(d1ΔU+raUbUV)+(d2ΔV+bUVβΘV)]dx. (3.3)

    After simplification, (3.3) gives

    dVdt=Ω(d1ΔU+d2ΔV)dxΩrd1aUΔUdx+Ω[rbaVβΘV(aUr)2aU]dx. (3.4)

    By Green's first identity and (1.3), one has

    ΩΔUdx=ΩΔVdx=0,Ωrd1aUΔUdx=Ωrd1aU2|U|2dx0. (3.5)

    Moreover, from rb<aβγ, we obtain the following estimation:

    Ω[rbaVβΘV(aUr)2aU]dxΩ[rbaVβΘV]dxΩ[rbaVβγV]dx0. (3.6)

    Noticing that V(0)=0, provided that (U,V)=(ra,0), based on [15] and (3.6), one knows that V(τ) is a Lyapunov function of (1.2). According to the boundedness of (1.2) in Theorem 2.1, the parabolic Lp-theory, the Sobolev Embedding Theorem and the standard compactness argument (see [25]), one knows that there exist some constants M,τ0>0 such that U(τ,)C2(¯Ω)+V(τ,)C2(¯Ω)M, for all ττ0. Thereby, it follows from the Sobolev Embedding Theorem [20] that (U,V)(ra,0) in L2(Ω)×L2(Ω), as τ. Also, dVdτ=0 iff (U,V)=(ra,0), which implies that {(U,V):dVdτ=0}={(ra,0)}. Thus, the steady state S attracts all the solutions of system (1.2). The proof is completed.

    Theorem 3.2. The positive steady state S+ of the model (1.2) with initial and boundary conditions (1.3) possesses global asymptotic stability in R, provided that rbaβγ.

    Proof. When the condition rbaβγ is true, V+=rbaβΘbβΘ>0. Thus, one knows that S+ is a unique positive steady state of system (1.2). The key of the proof is the construction of Lyapunov functional W(τ) and the estimation of dWdτ. In fact, one can construct the Lyapunov functional W(τ) as

    W(τ)=Ω[(U(τ,x)βΘbβΘblnbU(τ,x)βΘ)+(V(τ,x)rbaβΘbβΘrbaβΘbβΘlnbβΘV(τ,x)rbaβΘ)]dx. (3.7)

    By (3.7), one has

    dWdτ=Ω[(1βΘbU)Uτ+(1rbaβΘbβΘV)Vτ]=Ω[(1βΘbU)(d1ΔU+raUbUV)+(1rbaβΘbβΘV)(d2ΔV+bUVβΘV)]. (3.8)

    By simplification, similar to (3.5), one derives from the condition rbaβγ and (3.8) that

    dWdτ=Ω(d1ΔU+d2ΔV)dxΩ(βΘbUd1ΔU+rbaβΘbβΘVd2ΔV)dx+Ω(2rrβΘbUrbUβΘ)dxΩ(2rrβΘbUrbUβΘ)dx=rΩ(2βΘbUbUβΘ)dx0. (3.9)

    In view of (3.7), (3.9) and the remaining discussion being similar to Theorem 3.1, one concludes that the positive steady state S+ attracts all the solutions of system (1.2). The proof is completed.

    This section considers the following reaction-diffusion OGA model:

    {U(τ,)τ=d1ΔU(τ,)+raU(τ,)bU(τ,)V(τ,),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,V(τ,)τ=d2ΔV(τ,)+bU(τ,)V(τ,)βΘ(τ,)V(τ,),(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,U(τ,)n=V(τ,)n=0,(τ,x)(0,)×Ω,U(0,)=U0(),V(0,)=V0(),xΩ, (4.1)

    where Ω=(0,10), d1=0.6, d2=0.3, Θ(τ,)=0.8+0.2πarctan([τ]), U0(x)=1+|sin(x)|, V0(x)=1+|cos(x)|, and [τ] is a function such that only integral numbers are taken for the variable τ. Obviously, the set of unsustainable points of unsustainable treatment Θ(τ,) is the natural number set N+, which is infinitely countable.

    Case 1: Take r=1, a=0.2, b=0.6, β=4. From (4.1), one has γ=0.8, minxΩU0(x)=minxΩV0(x)=1, maxxΩU0(x)=maxxΩV0(x)=2, L1=203, L+1=12, L2=1, L+2=2. By Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, one knows that Eq (4.1) has at least a strong solution W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,)), for (τ,x)[0,+)×(0,10), satisfying 1U(τ,),V(τ,)12. Moreover, the condition 0.6=rb<aβγ=0.64 is true, and it follows from Theorem 3.1 that the semi-positive steady state S=(U0,V0)=(ra,0)=(5,0) of (4.1) has global asymptotic stability.

    Case 2: Take r=1, a=0.2, b=0.6, β=3. Similar to Case 1, γ=0.8, L1=5, L+1=9, L2=1, L+2=2. We conclude from Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 that Eq (4.1) has at least a strong solution W(τ,)=(U(τ,),V(τ,)), for (τ,x)[0,+)×(0,10), satisfying 1U(τ,),V(τ,)9. By the condition 0.6=rbaβγ=0.48, we know that the positive steady state S+=(U+,V+) is given by U=βΘb=5Θ, V=rbaβΘbβΘ=1Θ3Θ of (4.1), and has global asymptotic stability, where

    Θ¯[Θ(τ,)]={0.8+0.2πarctan(τ),τnN+,[0.8+0.2πarctan(n1),0.8+0.2πarctan(n)],τ=nN+. (4.2)

    Remark 4.1. Indeed, in Case 1, when the cure ratio of addictive gamers β>rbaγ=3.75, mathematically speaking, as long as the cure is powerful enough, the addictive gamers will vanish, and the population density of moderate gamers will tend to ra=5. Unfortunately, this case is difficult to achieve in practice. Generally speaking, the moderate gamers and addictive gamers coexist. People can only reduce the number of addictive gamers through treatment, and this treatment is intermittent and unsustainable. Therefore, Case 2 is more realistic.

    Remark 4.2. In Case 2, due to the influence of unsustainable treatment Θ(τ,)=0.8+0.2πarctan([τ]), the positive steady state S+=(U+,V+) varies with time variable τ. By formula (4.2), when τ(0,)N+, Θ=0.8+0.2πarctan([τ]), the positive steady state S+=(U+,V+) is uniquely determined by variable τ. For example, taking τ=1.5, Θ=0.8626, and the positive steady state S+=(U+,V+)(4.3128,0.0531). However, when τ=nN+, Θ belongs to the closed interval [0.8+0.2πarctan(n1),0.8+0.2πarctan(n)], and then the positive steady state S+=(U+,V+) is still not unique. For example, taking τ=2, Θ[0.8500,0.8705], and there exist infinite positive steady states S+=(U+,V+).

    (1) Figures 14 are some numerical simulations of Case 1. These simulations show that the equilibrium S=(U0,V0)=(5,0) of example (4.1) has global asymptotic stability. For any initial population density of moderate gamers and addicted gamers, after a long time of discontinuous treatment, the population density of the moderate gamers will be stable at 5, and the addicted gamers will vanish.

    Figure 1.  Evolution of moderate gamers u(x,t).
    Figure 2.  Evolution of addictive gamers v(x,t).
    Figure 3.  Projections of u(x,t) and v(x,t) at x=5.
    Figure 4.  Projections of u(x,t) and v(x,t) at t=80.

    (2) Figures 58 are some numerical simulations of Case 2 when τ=1.5R+N+. These simulations show that the positive steady state S+=(U+,V+)(4.3128,0.0531) of example (4.1) has global asymptotic stability. For any initial population density of moderate gamers and addicted gamers, the population densities of the moderate gamers and addicted gamers will be stable at S+=(4.3128,0.0531).

    Figure 5.  Evolution of moderate gamers u(x,t).
    Figure 6.  Evolution of addictive gamers v(x,t).
    Figure 7.  Projections of u(x,t) and v(x,t) at x=5.
    Figure 8.  Projections of u(x,t) and v(x,t) at t=80.

    (3) Figures 912 are some numerical simulations of Case 2 when τ=2N+. In this case, we use the random number generator of MATLAB to get Θ=0.8605[0.8500,0.8705]. A theoretical calculation gives the positive steady state S+=(U+,V+)(4.3025,0.0540) of example (4.1). For any initial population density of moderate gamers and addicted gamers, the population densities of the moderate gamers and addicted gamers will be stable at S+=(4.3025,0.0540).

    Figure 9.  Evolution of moderate gamers u(x,t).
    Figure 10.  Evolution of addictive gamers v(x,t).
    Figure 11.  Projections of u(x,t) and v(x,t) at x=5.
    Figure 12.  Projections of u(x,t) and v(x,t) at t=80.

    In the last decade, with the popularity of the internet, the number of internet users has continued to increase. While people enjoy the convenience and benefits brought by the internet, some disadvantages brought by the internet also begin to appear gradually. For example, online game addiction endangers the physical and mental health of players. In particular, many young addictive gamers are trapped in it. Many scholars, including mathematicians, began to pay attention to and study this phenomenon. Through the analysis of the dynamic change process of internet gamers, we put forward a new nonlinear reaction-diffusion model (1.2) of internet gamers having unsustainable treatment in this paper. Utilizing differential inclusion theory and stability theory, we study the existence and boundedness of solutions to the model as well as the global asymptotic stability of the steady states. Based on the MATLAB toolbox, an example is numerically simulated in detail. It is easy to see that the condition rb<aβγ in Theorem 3.1 and the condition rbaβγ in Theorem 3.2 are completely opposite. For any initial population density (U0(x),V0(x)) of moderate gamers and addicted gamers, after a long time of discontinuous treatment, the population density of the moderate gamers will be stable at ra, and the addicted gamers will vanish in the case of Theorem 3.1. Otherwise, the population densities of the moderate gamers and addicted gamers will be stable at S+ in the case of Theorem 3.2. Inspired by some recent research works [26,27,28], we can further apply fractional differential equation theory to study the model (1.2) in the future.

    The work was funded by research start-up funds for high-level talents of Taizhou University.

    The author declares no competing interest.



    [1] Q. Y. Yang, Y. L. Yu, X. L. Li, C. Chen, F. L. Lewis, Adaptive distributed synchronization of heterogeneous multi-agent systems over directed graphs with time-varying edge weights, J. Franklin Inst., 358 (2021), 2434–2452. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.01.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.01.018
    [2] T. Yang, L. O. Chua, Impulsive stabilization for control and synchronization of chaotic systems: theory and application to secure communication, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Fundam. Theory Appl., 44 (1997), 976–988. http://doi.org/10.1109/81.633887 doi: 10.1109/81.633887
    [3] Y. Sheng, H. Zhang, Z. G. Zeng, Synchronization of reaction diffusion neural networks with dirichlet boundary conditions and infinite delays, IEEE Trans Cybern., 47 (2017), 3005–3017. http://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2017.2691733 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2691733
    [4] Z. Y. Zhang, B. Luo, D. R. Liu, Y. H. Li, Pinning synchronization of memristor-based neural networks with time-varying delays, Neural Networks, 93 (2017), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2017.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2017.05.003
    [5] X. Z. Liu, K. X. Zhang, W. C. Xie, Pinning impulsive synchronization of reaction-diffusion neural networks with time-varying delays, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 28 (2017), 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2518479 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2518479
    [6] R. Q. Lu, P. Shi, H. G. Su, Z. G. Wu, J. Q. Lu, Pinning impulsive synchronization of reaction-diffusion neural networks with time-varying delays, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 29 (2018), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2636163 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2636163
    [7] J. D. Cao, J. Q. Lu, Adaptive synchronization of neural networks with or without time-varying delay, Chaos, 16 (2006), 013133. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2178448 doi: 10.1063/1.2178448
    [8] Y. F. Zhou, H. Zhang, Z. G. Zeng, Quasi-synchronization of delayed memristive neural networks via a hybrid impulsive control, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern.: Syst., 51 (2021), 1954–1965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2019.2911366 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2911366
    [9] W. Zhu, Q. H. Zhou, D. D. Wang, Consensus of linear multi-agent systems via adaptive event-based protocols, Neurocomputing, 318 (2018), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.050 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.050
    [10] S. B. Ding, Z. S. Wang, N. N. Rong, Intermittent control for quasi-synchronization of delayed discrete-time neural networks, IEEE Trans Cybern., 51 (2021), 862–873. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3004894 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3004894
    [11] H. T. Zhu, J. Q. Lu, J. G. Lou, Event-triggered impulsive control for nonlinear systems: the control packet loss case, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Express Briefs, 69 (2022), 3204–3208. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2022.3140346 doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2022.3140346
    [12] L. Z. Zhang, Y. Y. Li, J. G. Lou, J. Q. Lu, Bipartite asynchronous impulsive tracking consensus for multi-agent systems, Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 23 (2022), 1522–1532. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2100122 doi: 10.1631/FITEE.2100122
    [13] X. Z. Hou, H. Q. Wu, J. D. Cao, Observer-based prescribed-time synchronization and topology identification for complex networks of piecewise-smooth systems with hybrid impulses, Comp. Appl. Math., 43 (2024), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-024-02701-x doi: 10.1007/s40314-024-02701-x
    [14] S. Y. Dong, X. Z. Liu, S. M. Zhong, K. B. Shi, H. Zhu, Practical synchronization of neural networks with delayed impulses and external disturbance via hybrid control, Neural Networks, 157 (2023), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.09.025 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.09.025
    [15] R. Kumar, S. Sarkar, S. Das, J. D. Cao, Projective synchronization of delayed neural networks with mismatched parameters and impulsive effects, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 31 (2020), 1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2919560 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2919560
    [16] J. T. Sun, Y. P. Zhang, Q. D. Wu, Less conservative conditions for asymptotic stability of impulsive control systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 48 (2003), 829–831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2003.811262 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2003.811262
    [17] G. M. Zhuang, Y. Q. Liu, J. W. Xia, X. P. Xie, Normalized P-D and intermittent hybrid H control for delayed descriptor systems via impulsive-inputs-dependent conditions, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 63 (2024), 3125–3134. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2024.3389983 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2024.3389983
    [18] Z. Tang, J. H. Park, J. W. Feng, Impulsive effects on quasi-synchronization of neural networks with parameter mismatches and time-varying delay, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 29 (2018), 908–919. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2651024 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2651024
    [19] Y. F. Zhou, Z. G. Zeng, Event-triggered impulsive control on quasi-synchronization of memristive neural networks with time-varying delays, Neural Networks, 110 (2019), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2018.09.014 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.09.014
    [20] S. Wen, Z. G. Zeng, M. Z. Q. Chen, T. W. Huang, Synchronization of switched neural networks with communication delays via the event-triggered control, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 28 (2017), 2334–2343. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2580609 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2580609
    [21] Y. T. Cao, S. B. Wang, Z. Y. Guo, T. W. Huang, S. P. Wen, Synchronization of memristive neural networks with leakage delay and parameters mismatch via event-triggered control, Neural Networks, 119 (2019), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.011 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.011
    [22] Y. Y. Ni, Z. Wang, Y. J. Fan, J. Q. Lu, S. Hao, A switching memory-based event-trigger scheme for synchronization of Lur'e systems with actuator saturation: a hybrid Lyapunov method, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 35 (2024), 13963–13974. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3273917 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3273917
    [23] Y. Y. Ni, Z. Wang, Y. J. Fan, J. Q. Lu, S. Hao, Secure stabilization of networked Lur'e systems Suffering from DoS attacks: a resilient memory-based event-trigger mechanism, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., 19 (2024), 4658–4669. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2024.3384055 doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2024.3384055
    [24] X. Q. Zhao, H. Q. Wu, J. D. Cao, L. F. Wang, Prescribed-time synchronization for complex dynamic networks of piecewise smooth systems: a hybrid event-triggering control approach, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 24 (2025), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-024-01166-x doi: 10.1007/s12346-024-01166-x
    [25] X. Q. Zhao, H. Q. Wu, J. D. Cao, Practical finite-time synchronization for Lur'e systems with performance constraint and actuator faults: a memory-based quantized dynamic event-triggered control strategy, Appl. Math. Comput., 487 (2025), 129108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2024.129108 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2024.129108
    [26] D. V. Dimarogonas, E. Frazzoli, K. H. Johansson, Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 57 (2012), 1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2011.2174666 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2011.2174666
    [27] W. L. Lu, Y. J. Han, T. P. Chen, Synchronization in networks of linearly coupled dynamical systems via event-triggered diffusions, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 26 (2015), 3060–3069. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2402691 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2402691
    [28] Y. A. Meng, G. M. Zhuang, Y. Q. Wang, J. Feng, Observer-based switching-like adaptive-triggered resilient coordination control of discrete singular systems under DI attacks with uncertain occurrence probabilities, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.7775
    [29] J. Lunze, D. Lehmann, A state-feedback approach to event-based control, Automatica, 46 (2010), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.10.035 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.10.035
    [30] S. P. Wen, X. H. Yu, Z. G. Zeng, J. J. Wang, Event-triggering load frequency control for multiarea power systems with communication delays, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 63 (2016), 1308–1317. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2399394 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2399394
    [31] K. Ding, Q. X. Zhu, Intermittent quasi-synchronization criteria of chaotic delayed neural networks with parameter mismatches and stochastic perturbation mismatches via Razumikhin-type approach, Neurocomputing, 365 (2019), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.077 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.077
    [32] Y. T. Cao, S. P. Wen, M. Z. Q. Chen, T. W. Huang, Z. G. Zeng, New results on anti-synchronization of switched neural networks with time-varying delays and lag signals, Neural Networks, 81 (2016), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2016.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2016.05.004
    [33] H. N. Zheng, N. X. Yu, W. Zhu, Quasi-synchronization of drive–response systems with parameter mismatch via event-triggered impulsive control, Neural Networks, 161 (2023), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2023.01.020 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.01.020
    [34] W. L. He, F. Qian, J. Lam, G. R. Chen, Q. L. Han, J. Kurths, Quasi-synchronization of heterogeneous dynamic networks via distributed impulsive control: error estimation, optimization and design, Automatica, 62 (2015), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.09.028 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.09.028
    [35] Y. B. Zhao, H. Q. Wu, Fixed/Prescribed stability criterions of stochastic system with time-delay, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 14425–14453. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024701 doi: 10.3934/math.2024701
    [36] Y. Wan, J. D. Cao, G. H. Wen, Quantized synchronization of chaotic neural networks with scheduled output feedback control, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 28 (2017), 2638–2647. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2598730 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2598730
    [37] W. Zhu, D. D. Wang, L. Liu, G. Feng, Event-based impulsive control of continuous-time dynamic systems and its application to synchronization of memristive neural networks, IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Learn. Syst., 29 (2018), 3599–3609. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2731865 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2731865
    [38] C. D. Li, G. R. Chen, X. F. Liao, Z. P. Fan, Chaos quasisynchronization induced by impulses with parameter mismatches, Chaos, 16 (2006), 023102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2179648 doi: 10.1063/1.2179648
    [39] P. F. Curran, L. O. Chua, Absolute stability theory and the synchronization problem, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 7 (1997), 1375–1382. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127497001096 doi: 10.1142/S0218127497001096
    [40] Q. Xiao, Z. K. Huang, Z. G. Zeng, Passivity analysis for memristor-based inertial neural networks with discrete and distributed delays, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst., 49 (2019), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2017.2732503 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2732503
    [41] H. G. Zhang, T. D. Ma, G. B. Huang, Z. L. Wang, Robust global exponential synchronization of uncertain chaotic delayed neural networks via dual-stage impulsive control, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern., 40 (2021), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2030506 doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2030506
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Rabha W. Ibrahim, K-symbol fractional order discrete-time models of Lozi system, 2022, 1023-6198, 1, 10.1080/10236198.2022.2158736
    2. Nadia M. G. Al-Saidi, Hayder Natiq, Dumitru Baleanu, Rabha W. Ibrahim, The dynamic and discrete systems of variable fractional order in the sense of the Lozi structure map, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 733, 10.3934/math.2023035
    3. Nadia M. G. Al-Saidi, Shaymaa H. Salih, A New Convex Controller for Stabilizing of Two Symmetrical Logistic Maps, 2022, 2322, 1742-6588, 012054, 10.1088/1742-6596/2322/1/012054
    4. Shaymaa Hussain, Nadia Al-saidi, Suzan Obaıys, Yeliz Karaca, 3D Chaotic Nonlinear Dynamic Population-Growing Mathematical System Modeling with Multiple Controllers, 2024, 6, 2687-4539, 218, 10.51537/chaos.1446633
    5. Xinna Mao, Hongwei Feng, Maryam A. Al-Towailb, Hassan Saberi-Nik, Dynamical analysis and boundedness for a generalized chaotic Lorenz model, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 19719, 10.3934/math.20231005
    6. Nadia M. G. Al-Saidi, Suzan J. Obaiys, Nawras A. Alwan, Arkan J. Mohammed, Alaa Kadhim Farhan, Yeliz Karaca, 2024, Chapter 5, 978-3-031-65153-3, 72, 10.1007/978-3-031-65154-0_5
    7. Nadia Al-saidi, Shaymaa Hussain, Farah Al-zahed, Suha Shihab, Modified Pell Matrix Technique for Solving Optimal Control Problems, 2024, 2717-6355, 10.47086/pims.1567406
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(555) PDF downloads(55) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog