
In this paper, a dynamic HIV model with cell-to-cell transmission, two immune responses, and induced apoptosis is proposed and studied. First, the non-negativity and boundedness of the solutions of the model are given, and then the exact expression of the basic reproduction number R0 is obtained by using the next generation matrix method. Second, criteria are obtained for the local stability of the disease-free equilibrium, immune response-free equilibrium, and the infected equilibrium with both humoral and cellular immune responses. Furthermore, the threshold conditions are also derived for the global asymptotic stability of the disease-free equilibrium, immune response-free equilibrium, and the infected equilibrium with both humoral and cellular immune responses by constructing the suitable Lyapunov function. Finally, some numerical simulations are conducted to verify the theoretical results; the numerical simulation results show that the increase of apoptosis rate had a positive role in the control of viral infection.
Citation: Ru Meng, Yantao Luo, Tingting Zheng. Stability analysis for a HIV model with cell-to-cell transmission, two immune responses and induced apoptosis[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14786-14806. doi: 10.3934/math.2024719
[1] | A. M. Elaiw, A. S. Shflot, A. D. Hobiny . Stability analysis of SARS-CoV-2/HTLV-I coinfection dynamics model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6136-6166. doi: 10.3934/math.2023310 |
[2] | A. M. Elaiw, N. H. AlShamrani, A. D. Hobiny . Mathematical modeling of HIV/HTLV co-infection with CTL-mediated immunity. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1634-1676. doi: 10.3934/math.2021098 |
[3] | Ruiqing Shi, Yihong Zhang . Dynamic analysis and optimal control of a fractional order HIV/HTLV co-infection model with HIV-specific antibody immune response. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9455-9493. doi: 10.3934/math.2024462 |
[4] | Yan Ren, Yan Cheng, Yuzhen Chai, Ping Guo . Dynamics and density function of a HTLV-1 model with latent infection and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36444-36469. doi: 10.3934/math.20241728 |
[5] | Hanan S. Gafel, Saima Rashid, Sayed K. Elagan . Novel codynamics of the HIV-1/HTLV-Ⅰ model involving humoral immune response and cellular outbreak: A new approach to probability density functions and fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28246-28279. doi: 10.3934/math.20231446 |
[6] | A. M. Elaiw, E. A. Almohaimeed, A. D. Hobiny . Stability of HHV-8 and HIV-1 co-infection model with latent reservoirs and multiple distributed delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19195-19239. doi: 10.3934/math.2024936 |
[7] | Ahmed M. Elaiw, Amani S. Alsulami, Aatef D. Hobiny . Global properties of delayed models for SARS-CoV-2 infection mediated by ACE2 receptor with humoral immunity. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1046-1087. doi: 10.3934/math.2024052 |
[8] | Ahmed M. Elaiw, Ghadeer S. Alsaadi, Aatef D. Hobiny . Global co-dynamics of viral infections with saturated incidence. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 13770-13818. doi: 10.3934/math.2024671 |
[9] | Cuifang Lv, Xiaoyan Chen, Chaoxiong Du . Global dynamics of a cytokine-enhanced viral infection model with distributed delays and optimal control analysis. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9493-9515. doi: 10.3934/math.2025438 |
[10] | B. S. Alofi, S. A. Azoz . Stability of general pathogen dynamic models with two types of infectious transmission with immune impairment. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 114-140. doi: 10.3934/math.2021009 |
In this paper, a dynamic HIV model with cell-to-cell transmission, two immune responses, and induced apoptosis is proposed and studied. First, the non-negativity and boundedness of the solutions of the model are given, and then the exact expression of the basic reproduction number R0 is obtained by using the next generation matrix method. Second, criteria are obtained for the local stability of the disease-free equilibrium, immune response-free equilibrium, and the infected equilibrium with both humoral and cellular immune responses. Furthermore, the threshold conditions are also derived for the global asymptotic stability of the disease-free equilibrium, immune response-free equilibrium, and the infected equilibrium with both humoral and cellular immune responses by constructing the suitable Lyapunov function. Finally, some numerical simulations are conducted to verify the theoretical results; the numerical simulation results show that the increase of apoptosis rate had a positive role in the control of viral infection.
Human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) is a family of retroviruses that predominantly target human T cells, a vital component of the immune system responsible for immune response regulation. HTLV is significant due to its link to various diseases and its capacity to persist in the human body over extended periods. Currently, four strains of this virus HTLV-1, HTLV-2, HTLV-3, and HTLV-4 are known to infect humans. Of these, only HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 have been associated with particular health issues [1]. These two strains share similar biological features and modes of transmission. HTLV-1 primarily targets CD4+ T cells (also known as helper T cells) and is associated with two major diseases: adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) and a neurological disorder known as HTLV-1-associated myelopathy or tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) [2]. On the other hand, HTLV-2 primarily infects CD8+ T cells, commonly referred to as cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), which are essential for eliminating cells infected by viruses [2]. This strain has been connected to tropical spastic paraparesis as well as peripheral neuropathy [2]. People co-infected with HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 frequently face physical symptoms like chronic pain and weakness, along with social and psychological difficulties, such as depression and the stigma associated with carrying these viruses [3,4]. The successful transmission of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 to target cells necessitates direct interaction between cells (cell-to-cell) [5]. Both viruses rely on the envelope glycoproteins to mediate cell attachment and entry [5]. HTLV is spread through three primary pathways: from parent to child (e.g., during birth or breastfeeding), through parenteral exposure (such as infected blood transfusions, organ transplants, or sharing needles), and via sexual contact [5]. As of 2012, it was estimated that between five and ten million people globally were infected with HTLV-1. Regions with high prevalence included South America, the Caribbean, Southwest Japan, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Australo Melanesia [6]. In contrast, HTLV-2 infections were significantly less common by 2015, with estimates ranging from 670,000 to 890,000 cases [7]. Most HTLV-2 cases were reported in the United States, particularly among Native American communities and intravenous drug users. Brazil, the country with the second-highest HTLV-2 prevalence, showed a similar distribution pattern. Infections with these viruses also aggravate other illnesses, such as tuberculosis and strongyloidiasis, which are widespread in endemic regions, adding to the challenges and expenses of their treatment [4,8]. Although HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection is relatively uncommon, it has been identified in certain high-risk populations, especially among individuals who use injection drugs. The health consequences of these co-infections are not yet fully understood, highlighting the need for additional research to clarify their effects on disease progression and overall well-being. At present, no effective treatment exists for infections caused by HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, highlighting the importance of prevention and control measures to limit the dissemination of these viruses and reduce their impact on public health, especially in endemic regions [4].
The study of mathematical models offers a powerful and insightful approach to understanding the dynamics of viral infections within a host. This method enhances our comprehension of the mechanisms underlying diseases caused by different viruses. Recently, there has been an increased focus on mathematical models of HTLV-1 dynamics within a host, as they help to uncover the complex interactions between the virus, host cells, and the immune response. The model describing within-host HTLV-1 dynamics, incorporating the CTL-mediated immune response, is expressed as follows [9]:
˙U=α⏟generation rate of healthy CD4+ T cells−ρUU⏟mortality rate−ηUHUH⏟infectivity rate, | (1.1) |
˙H=ηUHUH⏟infectivity rate−ρHH⏟mortality rate−χHC⏟killing rate of HTLV-1-infected cells by CD8+ T cells, | (1.2) |
˙C=σHC⏟activation rate of CD8+ T cells−ρCC⏟mortality rate. | (1.3) |
Here,
U=U(t), H=H(t)andC=C(t) |
represent, respectively, the concentrations of healthy CD4+ T cells, HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells, and healthy CD8+ T cells at time t. This mathematical model has been further expanded and refined by numerous researchers. Lim and Maini [10] developed a model to study HTLV-1 dynamics, factoring in CTL response and cell division. Pan et al. [11] created a model to describe HTLV dynamics, incorporating CTL response and time delays. Wang et al. [12] constructed a detailed HTLV-1 infection model that integrates nonlinear CTL responses (both lytic and nonlytic), a nonlinear incidence rate, distributed delays, and CTL dysfunction. Bera et al. [13] examined an HTLV-1 infection model that includes delayed CTL response. In another study, Wang et al. [14] investigated HTLV-1 dynamics using a model with two distinct delays: one for intracellular processes and another for CTL immune response. Papers [15,16,17] explored HTLV-1 dynamics with CTL response and cell division. Chen et al. [18] conducted a global dynamical analysis of an HTLV-1 infection model, incorporating logistic growth of CD4+ T cells and nonlinear CTL response. Then the model was extended by taking into account delay CTL response [19] and environment noise [20]. The model proposed by [20] includes the impacts of reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and IL-2 immunotherapy, leading to the determination of an optimal therapeutic strategy. Wang and Ma [21] integrated CTL immunity and cell division into a diffusive model of HTLV infection. In contrast, research on HTLV-2 through mathematical modeling has been limited, with much less attention dedicated to its study.
Recent studies have focused on developing mathematical models to examine the co-infection dynamics of HTLV-1 with other viruses, such as HIV-1 (see, for instance, [22,23,24,25,26]) and SARS-CoV-2 [27]. A recent study by [28] developed and analyzed a co-infection model for HIV-1 and HTLV-2. As far as we can ascertain from a comprehensive review of the literature, no previous work has performed a dynamical analysis of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection. Although various studies have explored HTLV-1 individually, we have not encountered any research that develops and examines a mathematical model specifically addressing the HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection dynamics.
This research focuses on formulating and examining a mathematical model that captures the dynamics of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection within a host. The novelty of this study lies in the following key aspects:
B1. A novel co-infection model has been developed to describe the within-host interactions of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, capturing their simultaneous presence in the host system.
B2. The model is structured based on the distinct cellular targets of each virus: HTLV-1 primarily infects CD4+ T cells, whereas HTLV-2 predominantly targets CD8+ T cells.
B3. A rigorous analysis of the model's solutions confirms their non-negativity and boundedness, ensuring both mathematical consistency and biological relevance.
B4. Four threshold parameters are established, which fully determine the conditions for the existence and stability of the model's equilibrium points.
B5. The global stability of each equilibrium is examined using the Lyapunov function approach.
B6. Theoretical results are substantiated through numerical simulations.
B7. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on the basic reproduction numbers for HTLV-1 (R1) and HTLV-2 (R2), assessing their dependence on key model parameters.
This methodology provides a comprehensive framework for examining the co-dynamics of HTLV variants and their impact on the host. HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 were chosen for this study due to their significant public health implications, their association with severe diseases, and their epidemiological relevance in HIV co-infection. Understanding their dynamics is crucial for enhancing disease control measures and developing effective intervention strategies. Moreover, the proposed model can be adapted to investigate the competitive transmission dynamics of different COVID-19 strains, such as Omicron and Delta.
The structure of this paper is as follows: Sections 2 and 3 introduce the formulation of the co-infection model, analyze the non-negativity and boundedness of its solutions, and derive the equilibrium points along with the threshold parameters. Section 4 explores the global stability of the equilibria. In Section 5, numerical simulations are conducted to validate the theoretical results. Finally, Section 6 provides a summary of the study's findings, discusses their implications, and suggests directions for future research.
This section provides a detailed description of the proposed model. The formulation of the model is based on the following assumptions:
A1. The model represents four populations: healthy CD4+ T cells (U), HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells (H), healthy CD8+ T cells (C), and HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells (M). The compartments U, H, C, and M have respective mortality rates of ρUU, ρHH, ρCC, and ρMM.
A2. Healthy CD4+ T cells, which serve as the main targets for HTLV-1, are produced at a constant rate α. These cells can be infected by HTLV-1 through a cell-to-cell transmission mechanism at a rate of ηUHUH [9] (see Eq (2.1)).
A3. HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells are generated at a rate of ηUHUH. These infected cells are eliminated through immune-mediated destruction by CD8+ T cells, at a rate represented by χHC [9] (see Eq (2.2)).
A4. Healthy CD8+ T cells, the primary targets of HTLV-2, are produced at a constant rate γ (self-regulating immune response) and proliferate in response to the presence of HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells at a rate of σHC (predator prey-like immune response) [9]. These cells can become infected through direct contact with HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells via a cell-to-cell mechanism, at a rate described by ηCMCM [5,28] (see Eq (2.3)).
A5. HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells are generated at a rate of ηCMCM [28] (see Eq (2.4)).
Figure 1 illustrates the diagram that outlines the dynamics of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection.
According to assumptions A1–A5, the structure of the proposed models (2.1)–(2.4) is outlined as follows:
˙U=α−ρUU−ηUHUH, | (2.1) |
˙H=ηUHUH−ρHH−χHC, | (2.2) |
˙C=γ+σHC−ρCC−ηCMCM, | (2.3) |
˙M=ηCMCM−ρMM. | (2.4) |
The descriptions and values of the variables and parameters are shown in Table 1.
Symbol | Description | Value | Source |
U | Concentration of healthy CD4+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
H | Concentration of HTLV-1 infected CD4+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
C | Concentration of healthy CD8+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
M | Concentration of HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
α | Production rate of healthy CD4+ T cells | 10 cells μL−1 day−1 | [15,29] |
ρU | Mortality rate of healthy CD4+ T cells | 0.01 day−1 | [30,31] |
ηUH | Incidence rate due to CTC contact between | varied | – |
HTLV-1-infected and healthy CD4+ T cells | |||
ρH | Mortality rate of HTLV-1 infected CD4+ T cells | 0.05 day−1 | [11,12,14] |
χ | killing rate of HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells | 0.02 cells −1 μL day−1 | [11,12,14,32] |
due to CD8+ T cells | |||
γ | Generation rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 20 cells μL−1 day−1 | [33] |
σ | Activation rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 0.2 cells−1 μL day−1 | [34] |
ρC | Mortality rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 0.06 day−1 | [33] |
ηCM | Incidence rate due to CTC contact between | varied | – |
HTLV-2-infected and healthy CD8+ T cells | |||
ρM | Mortality rate of HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells | 0.3 day−1 | Assumed |
Remark 1. We mention that we have used bilinear incidence rate for the infection rate. This form is commonly used in mathematical virology due to its simplicity and analytical tractability while capturing the fundamental interaction between target cells and viruses or infected cells (see, e.g., [9,10,11,17]). Specifically, the terms ηUHUH and ηCMCM represent the infection rates proportional to the product of interacting populations, aligning with the standard mass-action principle. Some modifed versions for the infection rate have been included in the HTLV-1 models, such as:
● Saturated incidence: ηUHUH1+mH, where m≥0. This incidence form can be suitable when the concentration of infected T cells becomes significantly high [35].
● Holling type-Ⅰ: ηUHUH1+nU [16].
● Beddington-DeAngelis incidence: ηUHUH1+nU+mH, where n,m≥0 [36].
● Crowley Martin incidence: ηUHUH(1+nU)(1+mH) [12].
● Nonlinear incidence: ηUHUpHq, where p and q are positive constants [21]. Another form, presented in [37,38] as Ψ(H)U, where Ψ is a nonlinear function. In [12], the bilinear incidence ηUHUH was adjusted to ηUHUH1+q0C to incorporate the impact of the non-lytic CTL (NL-CTL) response, which suppresses viral replication through soluble mediators. Here, q0 represents the effectiveness of the NL-CTL response.
● Standard incidence: ηUHUHU+H, [39]. This form has been generalized in [40] as ηUHUH(U+H)ε, where 0≤ε≤1.
● General incidence: Ψ(U,H)H, where Ψ(U,H) is a general function that is the average number of healthy CD4+ T cells that are infected by unit HTLV-1-infected CD4 + T cells per unit time [21]. In [41], a general incidence in the form Ψ(U,H) is considered.
Due to the limited experimental data specifically quantifying HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection transmission rates, we adopted this bilinear incidence as a reasonable first approximation.
This section analyzes the essential qualitative characteristics of the systems (2.1)–(2.4), including the solutions' nonnegativity and boundedness of solutions. Moreover, each equilibrium is identified together with its corresponding threshold number.
In this subsection, we establish the well-posedness of the models (2.1)–(2.4) by demonstrating that the solutions remain nonnegative and bounded over time.
Lemma 1. Solutions of the systemS (2.1)–(2.4) are nonnegative and bounded.
Proof. We have
˙U|U=0=α>0, ˙H|H=0=0, ˙C|C=0=γ>0, ˙M|M=0=0. |
Hence, in conformity with [42, Proposition B.7]
(U,H,C,M)(t)∈R4≥0 |
for any t≥0, when
(U,H,C,M)(0)∈R4≥0. |
To illustrate the boundedness of the solutions. Let's establish the definition of ψ(t) as:
ψ=U+H+χσ[C+M]. |
Next, we obtain
˙ψ=˙U+˙H+χσ[˙C+˙M]=α−ρUU−ηUHUH+ηUHUH−ρHH−χHC+χσ[γ+σHC−ρCC−ηCMCM+ηCMCM−ρMM]=α+χγσ−ρUU−ρHH−χρCσC−χρMσM≤α+χγσ−ϱ[U+H+χσ(C+M)]=α+χγσ−ϱψ, |
where
ϱ=min{ρU,ρH,ρC,ρM}. |
Thus,
ψ(t)≤αϱ+χγσϱ=τ1 |
if
ψ(0)≤τ1. |
Consequently
0≤U(t), H(t)≤τ1, 0≤C(t), M(t)≤τ2 |
if
U(0)+H(0)+χσ[C(0)+M(0)]≤τ1, |
where
τ2=σχτ1. |
This completes the proof.
Define
U0=αρU |
and
C0=γρC, |
and introduce the following four indices, which will serve as threshold parameters, denoted by
Ri,i=1,2,3,4 |
and given by
R1=αηUHρCρU(ρHρC+χγ), R2=γηCMρMρC, R3=ηUHηCMαρU(ηCMρH+χρM),R4=ηUHηCMηUHρC+ρUσ(γρM+σαηCMρH+χρM). | (3.1) |
It is crucial to highlight that R1 indicates the basic reproduction number for HTLV-1 single infection and represents the number of new CD4+ T cells infected with HTLV-1 that are generated from a single HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cell during the early phase of HTLV-1 single infection. The parameter R2 stands for the basic reproduction number for HTLV-2 single infection and represents the quantity of newly infected CD8+ T cells carrying HTLV-2 that originate from one HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cell in the initial phases of HTLV-2 single infection. The threshold values R3 and R4 serve as indicators of the likelihood of co-infection with HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.
Lemma 2. For the models (2.1)–(2.4), four equilibrium points (EPs) exist, such that
(I) Disease-free equilibrium, EP0, is always presented, where
EP0=(U0,0,C0,0). |
(II) If R1>1, an equilibrium for HTLV-1 single infection,
EP1=(U1,H1,C1,0) |
will emerge in addition to EP0.
(III) If R2>1, an equilibrium for HTLV-2 single infection,
EP2=(U2,0,C2,M2) |
will emerge in addition to EP0.
(IV) If R3>1 and R4>1, an equilibrium HTLV-1/HTLV-2 co-infection,
EP3=(U3,H3,C3,M3) |
will emerge in addition to EP0.
Proof. The EPs of models (2.1)–(2.4) satisfy the following:
{0=α−ρUU−ηUHUH,0=ηUHUH−ρHH−χHC,0=γ+σHC−ρCC−ηCMCM,0=ηCMCM−ρMM. | (3.2) |
Solving the algebraic system (3.2), we obtain four equilibrium points as follows:
(1) Disease-free equilibrium,
EP0=(U0,0,C0,,0). |
(2) HTLV-1 single infection equilibrium,
EP1=(U1,H1,C1,0), |
where
U1=ρH+χC1ηUH, C1=γρC−σH1 |
and H1 fulfills the following:
a1H21+a2H1+a3ρC−σH1=0, |
where
a1=ρHηUHσ,a2=ρUρHσ−σαηUH−ρHηUHρC−χγηUH,a3=αηUHρC−ρU(ρHρC+χγ). |
Let us define a function D(H) as follows:
D(H)=a1H2+a2H+a3ρC−σH=0, H∈[0,ρCσ). |
Note that, D is continuous on [0,ρCσ). We have
D(0)=αηUHρC−ρU(ρHρC+χγ)ρC=ρU(ρHρC+χγ)ρC(R1−1). |
The presence of an HTLV-1 single infection is determined by evaluating the parameter R1. Since
D(0)>0 |
if R1>1 in addition to
limH→(ρCσ)−D(H)=−∞, |
there exists H1 such that
0<H1<ρCσ |
and satisfies
D(H1)=0. |
Consequently, we obtain U1>0, and C1>0.
(3) HTLV-2 single infection equilibrium,
EP2=(U2,0,C2,M2), |
where
U2=αρU=U0,C2=ρMηCM=C0R2,M2=ρCηCM(R2−1). |
The persistence of an HTLV-2 single infection can be ascertained by assessing the parameter R2.
(4) HTLV-1/HTLV-2 co-infection equilibrium,
EP3=(U3,H3,C3,M3), |
where
U3=ηCMρH+χρMηUHηCM, H3=ρUηUH(R3−1), C3=ρMηCM, M3=ηUHρC+ρUσηUHηCM(R4−1). |
This completes the proof.
This section aims to examine the global asymptotic stability of all EPs in the models (2.1)–(2.4) using the Lyapunov approach, as proposed in the work conducted by [43]. We define a function
F(x)=x−(1+lnx). |
Moreover, the arithmetic mean-geometric mean inequality is utilized to establish the proofs of Theorems 1–4 as:
1mm∑k=1Sk≥(m∏k=1Sk)1m, Sk≥0, k=1,2,...,m. | (4.1) |
Let Lk be the candidate Lyapunov function and define H′k as the largest invariant set of
Hk={(U,H,C,M):dLkdt=0}, wherek=0,1,2,3. |
Theorem 1. The disease-free equilibrium EP0 is globally asymptotically stable (GAS) if R1≤1 and R2≤1; otherwise, it is unstable.
Proof. To verify (ⅰ), we define L0(U,H,C,M) as:
L0=U0F(UU0)+H+χσC0F(CC0)+χσM. |
Obviously,
L0(U,H,C,M)>0 |
for any
U,H,C,M>0 |
and
L0(U0,0,C0,0)=0. |
The derivative of L0 along the solutions of systems (2.1)–(2.4) can be computed as:
dL0dt=(1−U0U)˙U+˙H+χσ(1−C0C)˙C+χσ˙M. |
By substituting the equations stated in models (2.1)–(2.4), we derive
dL0dt=(1−U0U)(α−ρUU−ηUHUH)+(ηUHUH−ρHH−χHC)+χσ(1−C0C)(γ+σHC−ρCC−ηCMCM)+χσ(ηCMCM−ρMM). |
By gathering the terms and substituting α with ρUU0 and γ with ρCC0, we derive the following expression:
dL0dt=−ρUU(U−U0)2−χσρCC(C−C0)2+ηUHU0H−ρHH−χC0H+χηCMσC0M−χρMσM=−ρUU(U−U0)2−χσρCC(C−C0)2+(ηUHU0−ρH−χC0)H+χσ(ηCMC0−ρM)M. |
Then,
dL0dt=−ρUU(U−U0)2−χσρCC(C−C0)2+ρHρC+χγρC(αηUHρCρU(ρHρC+χγ)−1)H+χρMσ(γηCMρMρC−1)M. |
Ultimately, we obtain
dL0dt=−ρUU(U−U0)2−χσρCC(C−C0)2+ρHρC+χγρC(R1−1)H+χρMσ(R2−1)M. |
Thus,
dL0dt≤0 |
satisfies if R1≤1 and R2≤1. Moreover,
dL0dt=0, |
when
U=U0, C=C0, (R1−1)H=0 and (R2−1)M=0. |
The solutions of the system approach H′0 [44]. Every element in H′0 satisfies U=U0, C=C0,
(R1−1)H=0 and (R2−1)M=0. | (4.2) |
As a result, four cases arise:
(I) R1=1 and R2=1. Then from Eq (2.1) we obtain
˙U=α−ρUU0−ηUHU0H=0⟹H(t)=0 for any t. | (4.3) |
From Eq (2.3) we have
˙C=γ−ρCC0−ηCMC0M=0⟹M(t)=0 for any t. | (4.4) |
Hence,
H′0={EP0}. |
(II) R1<1 and R2<1. Then, Eq (4.2) implies that H=M=0 and, hence,
H′0={EP0}. |
(III) R1=1 and R2<1. Then, Eq (4.2) suggests M=0 and Eq (4.3) gives H=0. Thus,
H′0={EP0}. |
(IV) R1<1 and R2=1. Eq (4.2) gives H=0 while Eq (4.4) implies M=0. Consequently,
H′0={EP0}. |
By LaSalle's invariance principle (LP) [45], EP0 is GAS.
Now, let us establish the instability of EP0 if R1>1 and/or R2>1. First of all, we construct the Jacobian matrix
J=J(U,H,C,M) |
of models (2.1)–(2.4) as:
J=(−ρU−ηUHH−ηUHU00ηUHHηUHU−ρH−χC−χH00σCσH−ρC−ηCMM−ηCMC00ηCMMηCMC−ρM). | (4.5) |
Next, we calculate the characteristic equation at the equilibrium point EP0 as:
det(J−ΛI)=(Λ+ρU)(Λ+ρC)(k1Λ+k0)(f1Λ+f0)=0, | (4.6) |
where Λ represents the eigenvalue, I represents the identity matrix, and
k1=ρUρC,k0=ρU(ρHρC+χγ)−αηUHρC=ρU(ρHρC+χγ)(1−R1),f1=ρC,f0=ρMρC−γηCM=ρMρC(1−R2). |
Then matrix J has the following eigenvalues:
Λ1=−ρU, Λ2=−ρC,Λ3=−k0/k1=−(ρHρC+χγ)ρC(1−R1),Λ4=−f0/f1=−ρM(1−R2). |
Clearly, Λ3>0 and Λ4>0 , when R1>1 and R2>1 . It follows that if either R1>1 , R2>1 , or both, then EP0 is unstable.
This completes the proof.
Theorem 2. HTLV-1 single infection equilibrium EP1 is GAS if R1>1 and R4≤1.
Proof. Construct L1(U,H,C,M) as:
L1=U1F(UU1)+H1F(HH1)+χσC1F(CC1)+χσM. |
Clearly,
L1(U,H,C,M)>0 |
for any
U,H,C,M>0 |
and
L1(U1,H1,C1,0)=0. |
Calculating dL1dt as:
dL1dt=(1−U1U)(α−ρUU−ηUHUH)+(1−H1H)(ηUHUH−ρHH−χHC)+χσ(1−C1C)(γ+σHC−ρCC−ηCMCM)+χσ(ηCMCM−ρMM). |
Collecting terms results to
dL1dt=(1−U1U)(α−ρUU)+ηUHU1H−ηUHH1U−ρHH+ρHH1+χH1C+χσ(1−C1C)(γ−ρCC)−χC1H+χηCMσC1M−χρMσM. |
By using the subsequent equilibrium conditions
{α=ρUU1+ηUHU1H1,ηUHU1H1=ρHH1+χH1C1,γ=ρCC1−σH1C1, |
we obtain
dL1dt=−ρUU(U−U1)2−χσρCC(C−C1)2+(1−U1U)ηUHU1H1−χ(1−C1C)H1C1+(ηUHU1H1−ρHH1−χC1H1)HH1+χηCMσ(C1−ρMηCM)M−ηUHU1H1UU1+ρHH1+χH1C1CC1+χH1C1−χH1C1. |
It follows that
dL1dt=−ρUU(U−U1)2−χσρCC(C−C1)2+(2−U1U−UU1)ηUHU1H1−χ(2−C1C−CC1)H1C1+χηCMσ(C1−ρMηCM)M=−αUU1(U−U1)2−χσγCC1(C−C1)2+χηCMσ(C1−C3)M. |
We will now demonstrate that if
R4≤1⇔C1≤C3 |
as:
C1≤C3⇔αηUHσ+γηUHχ−ηUHρCρH−ρUσρH+√4γηUH(ηUHρC+ρUσ)χρH+(αηUHσ+γηUHχ−(ηUHρC+ρUσ)ρH)22(ηUHρC+ρUσ)χ≤ρMηCM⇔αηUHσ+γηUHχ−ηUHρCρH−ρUσρH+√4γηUH(ηUHρC+ρUσ)χρH+(αηUHσ+γηUHχ−(ηUHρC+ρUσ)ρH)2≤2(ηUHρC+ρUσ)χρMηCM⇔√4γηUH(ηUHρC+ρUσ)χρH+(αηUHσ+γηUHχ−(ηUHρC+ρUσ)ρH)2≤2(ηUHρC+ρUσ)χρMηCM−(αηUHσ+γηUHχ−ηUHρCρH−ρUσρH)⇔4γηUH(ηUHρC+ρUσ)χρH+(αηUHσ+γηUHχ−(ηUHρC+ρUσ)ρH)2≤(2(ηUHρC+ρUσ)χρMηCM−(αηUHσ+γηUHχ−ηUHρCρH−ρUσρH))2⇔αηUHηCMσρM+γηUHηCM(ηCMρH+χρM)≤ρM(ηUHρC+ρUσ)(ηCMρH+χρM)⇔αηUHηCMσρM+γηUHηCM(ηCMρH+χρM)ρM(ηUHρC+ρUσ)(ηCMρH+χρM)≤1⇔ηUHηCMηUHρC+ρUσ(γρM+σαηCMρH+χρM)≤1⇔R4≤1. |
Thus, by applying inequality (4.1), it follows that
dL1dt≤0 |
for all
U,H,C,M>0. |
In addition,
dL1dt=0 |
if
U=U1, C=C1 and (C1−C3)M=0. |
The solutions of models (2.1)–(2.4) approach H′1, where
U=U1, C=C1 |
and
(C1−C3)M=0. | (4.7) |
As a result, two cases arise:
(I) C1=C3, then from Eq (2.1)
˙U=α−ρUU1−ηUHU1H=0⟹H(t)=H1 for any t. | (4.8) |
From Eq (2.3), we have
˙C=γ+σH1C1−ρCC1−ηCMC1M=0⟹M(t)=0 for any t. | (4.9) |
Then,
H′1={EP1}. |
(II) C1<C3, then Eq (4.7) implies that M=0 and Eq (4.8) gives H=H1. Hence,
H′1={EP1}. |
Thus, by LP, EP1 is GAS.
Theorem 3. HTLV-2 single infection equilibrium, EP2 is GAS if R2>1 and R3≤1, and if R3>1, then EP2 is unstable.
Proof. Define L2(U,H,C,M) as:
L2=U2F(UU2)+H+χσC2F(CC2)+χσM2F(MM2). |
Evidently,
L2(U,H,C,M)>0 |
for any
U,H,C,M>0 |
and
L2(U2,0,C2,M2)=0. |
Calculating dL2dt as:
dL2dt=(1−U2U)(α−ρUU−ηUHUH)+(ηUHUH−ρHH−χHC)+χσ(1−C2C)(γ+σHC−ρCC−ηCMCM)+χσ(1−M2M)(ηCMCM−ρMM). |
Collecting the above terms leads to
dL2dt=(1−U2U)(α−ρUU)+ηUHU2H−ρHH+χσ(1−C2C)(γ−ρCC)−χC2H+χηCMσC2M−χηCMσM2C−χρMσM+χρMσM2. |
Utilizing the equilibrium conditions
α=ρUU2, γ=ρCC2+ηCMC2M2, C2=ρMηCM. |
We obtain
dL2dt=−ρUU(U−U2)2−χσρCC(C−C2)2+χσ(1−C2C)ηCMC2M2+(ηUHU2−ρH−χC2)H−χσηCMM2C2CC2+χσηCMC2M2=−ρUU(U−U2)2−χσρCC(C−C2)2+χσ(2−C2C−CC2)ηCMC2M2+ηCMρH+χρMηCM(ηUHηCMαρU(ηCMρH+χρM)−1)H=−ρUU(U−U2)2−χσγCC2(C−C2)2+ηCMρH+χρMηCM(R3−1)H. |
Then, if R3≤1 and by using inequality (4.1), we obtain that
dL2dt≤0 |
for any
U,H,C,M>0. |
Moreover,
dL2dt=0 |
if
U=U2, C=C2, and (R3−1)H=0. |
The model's solutions converge to H′2 where
U=U2, C=C2 |
and
(R3−1)H=0. | (4.10) |
As a result, two cases arise:
(I) R3=1. From Eq (2.1), we have
˙U=α−ρUU2−ηUHU2H=0⟹H(t)=0for any t. | (4.11) |
Equation (2.3) implies that
˙C=γ−ρCC2−ηCMC2M=0⟹M(t)=M2 for any t. | (4.12) |
Hence,
H′2={EP2}. |
(II) R3<1. Then, from Eq (4.10), we obtain H=0. In addition, Eq (4.12) gives M=M2 and, hence,
H′2={EP2}. |
Consequently, by LP, EP2 is GAS.
We demonstrate that if R3>1, then EP2 is unstable. By applying the Jacobian matrix in Eq (4.5), we can derive the characteristic equation at the equilibrium EP2 as follows:
Γ(Λ)=ηCMρUρMΛ3+(γη2CMρU+ρM(−αηUHηCM+ηCMρUρH+ρUχρM))Λ2+(γηCM(−αηUHηCM+ηCMρUρH+ρUχρM)+ηCMρU(γηCMρM−ρCρ2M))Λ+(−αηUHηCM+ηCMρUρH+ρUχρM)(γηCMρM−ρCρ2M)=0. |
Γ is continuous on [0,∞),
limΛ→∞Γ(Λ)=∞ |
and
Γ(0)=ρCρUρ2M(ηCMρH+xρM)(1−αηUHηCMρU(ηCMρH+xρM))(γηCMρCρM−1)=ρCρUρ2M(ηCMρH+xρM)(1−R3)(R2−1). |
Since R2>1 and R3>1, then Γ(0)<0. Hence, Γ(Λ) has a positive root, and thus EP2 is unstable.
This completes the proof.
Theorem 4. HTLV-1/HTLV-2 co-infection equilibrium, EP3 is GAS if R3>1 and R4>1.
Proof. Define L3(U,H,C,M) as:
L3=U3F(UU3)+H3F(HH3)+χσC3F(CC3)+χσM3F(MM3). |
Calculating dL3dt as:
dL3dt=(1−U3U)(α−ρUU−ηUHUH)+(1−H3H)(ηUHUH−ρHH−χHC)+χσ(1−C3C)(γ+σHC−ρCC−ηCMCM)+χσ(1−M3M)(ηCMCM−ρMM). |
Then we obtain
dL3dt=(1−U3U)(α−ρUU)+ηUHU3H−ηUHH3U−ρHH+ρHH3+χH3C+χσ(1−C3C)(γ−ρCC)−χC3H+χηCMσC3M−χηCMσM3C−χρMσM+χρMσM3. |
Using the equilibrium conditions
{α=ρUU3+ηUHU3H3,ηUHU3H3=ρHH3+χH3C3,γ=ρCC3+ηCMC3M3−σH3C3,C3=ρMηCM. |
We obtain
dL3dt=−ρUU(U−U3)2−χσρCC(C−C3)2+(1−U3U)ηUHU3H3+χσ(1−C3C)ηCMC3M3−χ(1−C3C)H3C3+(ηUHU3H3−ρHH3−χC3H3)HH3+χηCMσ(C3−ρMηCM)M−ηUHU3H3UU3+ρHH3+χH3C3CC3−χσηCMM3C3CC3+χρMσM3+χH3C3−χH3C3=−ρUU(U−U3)2−χσρCC(C−C3)2+(1−U3U)ηUHU3H3+χσ(1−C3C)ηCMC3M3−χ(1−C3C)H3C3ηUHU3H3UU3+ηUHU3H3+χH3C3CC3−χσηCMM3C3CC3+χσηCMC3M3−χH3C3. |
It follows that
dL3dt=−ρUU(U−U3)2−χσρCC(C−C3)2+(2−U3U−UU3)ηUHU3H3+χσ(2−C3C−CC3)ηCMC3M3−χ(2−C3C−CC3)H3C3=−ρUU(U−U3)2−χσρCC(C−C3)2−ηUHU(U−U3)2H3−χσηCMC(C−C3)2M3+χC(C−C3)2H3=−αU(U−U3)2−χσγC(C−C3)2. |
Therefore, if R3>1 and R4>1, and by applying inequality (4.1), we deduce that
dL3dt≤0 |
for all
U,H,C,M>0. |
In addition,
dL3dt=0 |
if
U=U3andC=C3. |
Solutions of models (2.1)–(2.4) converge to H′4, where
U=U3andC=C3. |
It follows that
˙U=˙C=0, |
and then Eqs (2.1) and (2.3) give
˙U=α−ρUU3−ηUHU3H=0⟹H(t)=H3 for any t,˙C=γ+σH3C3−ρCC3−ηCMC3M=0⟹M(t)=M3 for any t. |
Thus, by LP
H′3={EP3} |
and EP3 is GAS.
This completes the proof.
Table 2 summarizes the conditions for the existence and global stability of each equilibrium in the models (2.1)–(2.4).
Equilibrium | Existence condition | Stability condition |
EP0=(U0,0,C0,0) | - | R1≤1 and R2≤1 |
EP1=(U1,H1,C1,0) | R1>1 | R1>1 and R4≤1 |
EP2=(U2,0,C2,M2) | R2>1 | R2>1 and R3≤1 |
EP3=(U3,H3,C3,M3) | R3>1, R4>1 | R3>1 and R4>1 |
Remark 2. Investigating the memory effects and hereditary properties on our model's behavior using fractional differential equations (FDEs) offers a compelling research direction. FDEs are particularly effective in representing memory effects and non-local interactions, which are crucial in biological [46] and epidemiological systems [47,48]. While our study focuses on the integer-order version, extending the model to a fractional-order system could offer deeper insights into the long-term behavior of the system, particularly in capturing the persistence of infection or addiction-related processes. In recent years, the Lyapunov method has gained significant attention for studying the global stability of FDE models [49]. The Lyapunov functions constructed in this section are essential for examining a fractional model describing HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-dynamics.
The suggested model systems (2.1)–(2.4) are subjected to numerical simulation in order to acquire insights into dynamical features, hence enhancing our comprehension of how control approaches impact the dynamics of infectious disease transmission. First, the stability characteristics of the infectious model are examined.
This subsection provides numerical simulations based on the parameter values listed in Table 1 to visually represent the analytical results established in Theorems 1–4. We employed the ode45 solver in MATLAB to numerically solve the ordinary differential equation model. To establish the global stability of the system's equilibria, we show that its solutions converge to a specific equilibrium point, irrespective of the initial conditions. Given the scarcity of real-world data on initial infections with HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, we consider three distinct initial values as follows:
IP.1: U(0)=300, H(0)=0.1, C(0)=100, M(0)=30.IP.2: U(0)=400, H(0)=0.05, C(0)=150, M(0)=20.IP.3: U(0)=500, H(0)=0.01, C(0)=200, M(0)=10. |
We perform the numerical simulation by choosing the parameters ηUH and ηCM in the following scenarios:
Scenario−1: ηUH and ηCM are set at 0.005 and 0.0005, respectively. Our findings indicate that with these values
R1=0.74<1andR2=0.56<1. |
The paths shown in Figure 2 originating from the three points all converge to the equilibrium point
EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0). |
This demonstrates that EP0 is GAS as provided in Theorem 1. Consequently, the HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 will be eradicated by this process.
Scenario−2: ηUH and ηCM are set at 0.01 and 0.0005, respectively. This means that
R1=1.49>1 |
and
R4=0.77<1. |
The results depicted in Figure 3 illustrate how the solutions reach the equilibrium point
EP1=(923.91,0.08,459.46,0). |
In this scenario, Theorem 2 aligns with the findings. This situation exemplifies the effects of HTLV-1 infection without HTLV-2 on an individual health. It is evident that HTLV-1 has caused a decrease in CD4+ T cell counts and an increase in CD8+ T cell levels.
Scenario−3: The values of ηUH and ηCM are 0.001 and 0.002, respectively. Next, we calculate
R2=2.22>1 |
and
R3=0.33<1. |
It is clear that the criteria outlined in Table 2 are satisfactorily met. In Figure 4 we can observe how the solutions converge towards the equilibrium point
EP2=(1000,0,150,36.67) |
thereby confirming Theorem 3. This scenario illustrates the progression when an individual is solely infected with HTLV-2. Even though CD4+ T cell levels remain normal, it is evident that HTLV-2 has caused a decrease in CD8+ T cell counts.
Scenario−4: ηUH is 0.003, while ηCM is 0.004. After that, we calculate
R3=1.94>1 |
and
R4=2.14>1. |
The conditions specified in Table 2 are clearly met. As depicted in Figure 5, the solutions approach the equilibrium
EP3=(516.67,3.12,75,207.58) |
and confirm Theorem 4. This scenario illustrates the consequences of co-infection with both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 viruses in an individual. The quantities of healthy CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells decline, resulting in a weakening of the patient's immune system.
To provide additional verification, an analysis of the local stability is conducted for all equilibria. The Jacobian matrix J, which depends on the variables U, H, C, and M, is calculated in Eq (4.5). To determine the stability of each equilibrium, we compute the eigenvalues λk, where k=1,…,4 of J. An equilibrium point is considered stable if all eigenvalues have a real part less than zero, denoted as
Re(λk)<0 |
for all k=1,2,3,4. By calculating the nonnegative EPs and utilizing the parameter values specified in Scenarios 1–4, we can determine the eigenvalues associated with all equilibria. Table 3 provided a comprehensive overview of the positive equilibria and the real part of the eigenvalues.
Scenario | Equilibrium | Re(λk)<0,k=1,2,3,4 | Stability |
1 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−1.72,−0.13,−0.06,−0.01) | stable |
2 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (3.28,−0.13,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP1=(923.91,0.08,459.46,0) | (−0.02,−0.02,−0.07,−0.01) | stable | |
3 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−5.72,0.37,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP2=(1000,0,150,36.67) | (−2.05,−0.07,−0.07,−0.01) | stable | |
4 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−3.72,1.03,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP2=(1000,0,75,51.67) | (1.45,−0.13,−0.13,−0.01) | unstable | |
EP3=(516.67,3.12,75,207.58) | (−0.13,−0.13,−0.01,−0.01) | stable |
Sensitivity analysis is important for understanding systems by showing how model outcomes are affected by different parameters [50]. It helps enhance our grasp of model research. Sensitivity analysis evaluates how biological reactions change when parameters are adjusted, helping pinpoint the factors influencing model results [51]. Several methods of sensitivity analysis were introduced for biological models [51]. We apply derivative-based sensitivity analysis to our system. By computing the derivatives with respect to model parameters, we can analytically determine the indices. In our study, we examine the effect of R1 and R2 on the stability of disease-free infection equilibrium using sensitivity analysis. The normalized forward sensitivity index for Ri (where k=1,2) is expressed as follows:
SRkβ=∂Rk∂β×βRk, | (5.1) |
where β represents a given parameter.
Applying form (5.1) and using the parameter values provided in Table 1, we calculated the sensitivity indices of R1 with respect to each parameter, as presented in Table 4.
Parameters β | α | ηUH | ρC | ρU | χ | γ | ρH |
Value of SR1β | 1 | 1 | 0.9970 | −1 | −0.9970 | −0.9970 | −0.0030 |
The sensitivity index values for R1 with respect to the parameters are given in Table 1. Based on the presented sensitivity indices in Table 4, we observe that:
● The parameters α, ηUH, and ρC show positive sensitivity indices, suggesting that changes in these parameters will lead to corresponding increases or decreases in the basic reproduction number R1 for HTLV-1 mono-infection. Among them, α and ηUH exhibit the highest positive sensitivity indices.
● On the other hand, ρU, χ, γ, and ρH have a negative influence on R1. As a result, an increase in these values will lead to a reduction in the value of R1. Among these parameters, ρU, χ, and γ show greater significance compared to ρH.
Using Eq (5.1), we can calculate the sensitivity indices of R2 with respect to each parameter as shown in Table 5. It is clear that the sensitivity analysis of R2 is independent of the parameter values, as the sensitivity to any parameter is consistently either 1 or −1. The signs presented in Table 5 help us understand how each parameter contributes to the sensitivity analysis as:
Parameters β | γ | ηCM | ρC | ρM |
Value of SR2β | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 |
● The values of parameters γ and ηCM positively influence the growth of HTLV-2 in the body, suggesting their role in its proliferation.
● In contrast, parameters ρC and ρM are associated with reducing the transmission rate of HTLV-2 within humans.
This subsection examines the impact of the stimulated rate constant of CD8+ T cells, denoted as σ, on the system dynamics described by (2.1)–(2.4). In order to investigate the impact of CD8+ T cells on the model's solutions, we hold the values of
ηUH=0.003 |
and
ηCM=0.004 |
while varying the parameter σ. By choosing the following initial point:
IP.4: U(0)=500, H(0)=2, C(0)=50, M(0)=500. |
From Figure 6, we observe that as σ increases, the quantities of healthy CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells remain increased. Moreover, the number of HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells decreases.
It is also important to note that an increase in CD8+ T cells will increase the number of HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells. Clearly, enhanced CD8+ T cell stimulation helps control HTLV-1 infection while also promoting the spread of HTLV-2 infection. Due to the fact that R1 and R2 are independent of σ, increasing σ does not result in the attainment of EP0. To boost CD8+ T cell stimulation, the parameter σ can be substituted with (1+ϵ{IT})σ, where ϵ{IT}∈[0,1] denotes the drug efficacy of immunotherapy (IT), which enhances the proliferation of CD8+ T cells in infected individuals through the subcutaneous administration of IL-2, promoting their activation and differentiation [20].
In this part, we explore the impact of infection rates ηUH and ηCM on the HTLV1 and HTLV-2 co-dynamics. To demonstrate the impact of ηUH on the HTLV1 and HTLV-2 co-dynamics, we set
ηCM=0.004. |
We consider different values of ηUH as
ηUH=0.003, 0.009, 0.03, 0.09 |
and numerically solve systems (2.1)–(2.4) together with the following initial point:
IP.5: U(0)=200, H(0)=2, C(0)=50, M(0)=200. |
Figure 7 reveals a correlation in which an increase in ηUH leads to a reduction in the number of healthy CD4+ T cells, while the behavior of healthy CD8+ T cells does not change too much. At the same time, populations of HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells and HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells increase. In this context, raising ηUH may increase the risk of HTLV-2 infection. To reduce the HTLV-1 infection, the parameter ηUH can be replaced with (1−ϵRTI)ηUH, where ϵRTI∈[0,1] represents the drug efficacy of reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) like zidovudine, which effectively block the virus from spreading throughout the body [20,52].
To demonstrate the effect of ηCM on the HTLV1 and HTLV-2 co-dynamics, we set
ηUH=0.003. |
We examine different values of
ηCM=0.004, 0.006, 0.008, 0.01, |
and numerically solve systems (2.1)–(2.4) with the following initial point:
IP.6: U(0)=200, H(0)=0.5, C(0)=80, M(0)=80. |
Analysis of Figure 8 shows a correlation where an increase in ηCM results in a decrease in both healthy CD4+ T cells and healthy CD8+ T cells. At the same time, the populations of HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells and HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells increase. In this context, raising ηCM may increase the HTLV-1 progression.
Since HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 are closely linked to various health concerns and share transmission routes, they are especially common in high-risk populations, particularly among individuals who use injection drugs. Therefore, understanding the within-host co-dynamics of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 is crucial. In this paper, we develop a model to describe the dynamics of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection. A summary of the equilibria in our model is as follows:
(I) Disease-free equilibrium. EP0: this equilibrium always exists and is GAS when
R1≤1and R2≤1. |
In this scenario, both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 will be eradicated from the system. While there is no definitive cure for HTLV infections, treatment mainly focuses on managing associated conditions such as ATL and HAM/TSP using chemotherapy, corticosteroids, interferon, and supportive care. If antiviral drugs for HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 become available, it may be possible to achieve
R1≤1and R2≤1 |
by adjusting the parameters ηUH and ηCM. Specifically, these parameters can be replaced with (1−ϵRTI-HTLV-1)ηUH and (1−ϵRTI-HTLV-2)ηUH where ϵRTI-HTLV-1∈[0,1], and ϵRTI-HTLV-2∈[0,1] represent the efficacy of RTI drugs for HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, respectively. Then R1 and R2 become
R1=(1−ϵRTI-HTLV-1)αηUHρCρU(ρHρC+χγ),R2=(1−ϵRTI-HTLV-2)γηCMρMρC. |
Therefore, R1≤1 when
ϵminRTI-HTLV-1≤ϵRTI-HTLV-1≤1, |
R2≤1 when
ϵminRTI-HTLV-2≤ϵRTI-HTLV-2≤1, |
where
ϵminRTI-HTLV-1=max{0,1−ρU(ρHρC+χγ)αηUHρC},ϵminRTI-HTLV-2=max{0,1−ρMρCγηCM}. |
In this context, ϵminRTI-HTLV-1 and ϵminRTI-HTLV-2 represent the minimum drug efficacies necessary to stabilize EP0 and eliminate the co-infection from the host. By treating drug efficacies as control variables, optimal control theory can be applied to develop treatment strategies that minimize both the cost of the drugs and their associated side effects [24].
(II) HTLV-1 single infection equilibrium point. EP1: this equilibrium exists if R1>1 and is GAS if R4≤1. This scenario represents an individual infected only with HTLV-1. This likely occurs when ϵRTI-HTLV-1 is insufficient to eliminate the HTLV-1 infection, whereas ϵRTI-HTLV-2 is effective in clearing HTLV-2.
(III) HTLV-2 single infection equilibrium point. EP2: this equilibrium exists if R2>1 and is GAS if R3≤1. It describes a situation where an individual is infected only with HTLV-2. This situation may arise when ϵRTI-HTLV-2 fails to eradicate HTLV-2, whereas ϵRTI-HTLV-1 is sufficient to eliminate HTLV-1.
(IV) HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection equilibrium point. EP3: this equilibrium point exists and is GAS if
R3>1and R4>1. |
It represents an individual co-infected with both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2. Our findings indicate that co-infection with both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 leads to a decrease in the number of healthy CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, while the number of HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells and HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells increases, ultimately compromising the patient's immune response. This may elevate the risk associated with both infections.
A key limitation of our study is the inability to estimate the model's parameter values using real-world data. This challenge arises due to several factors: (ⅰ) the scarcity of available data on HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 co-infection; (ⅱ) the limited number of studies on this topic, making comparisons less reliable; and (ⅲ) the difficulty in obtaining clinical data from patients infected with both viruses.
In this study, we examined a mathematical model that captures the population dynamics of two HTLV strains, HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, which infect distinct target cells specifically CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, both crucial to the human immune system. Our model captures the interactions among four components: healthy CD4+ T cells, healthy CD8+ T cells, HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells, and HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells. We have provided preliminary results regarding the boundedness and non-negativity of the solutions to the model. We then determined that the models possess four EPs. Through the application of LaSalle's invariance principle and the construction of suitable Lyapunov functions, we identified four threshold parameters (R1,R2,R3,R4) that determine the global stability of the equilibrium points. To validate these theoretical results, numerical simulations were carried out. We found, a close match between the numerical and theoretical outcomes. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of the model's parameters on the basic reproduction numbers R1 and R2. The key findings emerged from the analysis:
● The model examined encompasses several clinical scenarios, including a patient who has recovered from both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infections, an individual with chronic HTLV-1 mono-infection, another with chronic HTLV-2 mono-infection, and a patient with persistent co-infection of both viruses.
● Enhanced stimulation of CD8+ T cells helps control HTLV-1 infection, while simultaneously promoting the spread of HTLV-2 infection. Numerous studies provide valuable insights into diverse approaches for boosting CD8+ T cell activation and their potential use in therapy (see, e.g., [53,54]). CD8+ T cell stimulation can be enhanced through immunotherapy, which involves promoting the proliferation of CD8+ T cells in infected individuals via subcutaneous injection of IL-2, thereby activating and differentiating the T cells [20].
● The coinfection with HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 may increase the risk of both viruses. Immune system dysregulation caused by both viruses could contribute to a higher inflammatory state, possibly worsening neurological symptoms.
Modeling the interactions between HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 has provided crucial insights into their pathogenesis and has also played a role in shaping guidelines for more effective treatment strategies for co-infection.
Our proposed model can be expanded in several directions:
(ⅰ) Incorporating a generalized incidence function Ψ(U,H) that encompasses various forms, such as saturated incidence, Beddington-DeAngelis incidence, and Crowley-Martin incidence [41];
(ⅱ) Extending the model using partial differential equations to account for cellular mobility;
(ⅲ) Employing fractional differential equations to capture the influence of immunological memory [48]. Future research could explore incorporating the impact of various drug therapies into the model.
Moreover, we aim to compare the model's outcomes with data from infected patients to validate its predictions.
E. A. Almohaimeed: conceptualization, formal analysis; A. M. Elaiw: investigation, formal analysis; A. D. Hobiny: methodology, writing original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University for financial support (QU-APC-2025).
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
[1] | Global HIV and AIDS statistics–Fact sheet, 2023. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet. |
[2] |
M. A. Nowak, C. R. M. Bangham, Population dynamics of immune responses to persistent viruses, Science, 272 (1996), 74–79. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5258.74 doi: 10.1126/science.272.5258.74
![]() |
[3] |
S. Gummuluru, C. M. Kinsey, M. Emerman, An in vitro rapid-turnover assay for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication selects for cell-to-cell spread of virus, J. Virol., 74 (2000), 10882–10891. http://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.74.23.10882-10891.2000 doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.23.10882-10891.2000
![]() |
[4] |
S. Iwami, J. S. Takeuchi, S. Nakaoka, F. Mammano, F. Clavel, H. Inaba, et al., Cell-to-cell infection by HIV contributes over half of virus infection, Elife, 4 (2015), e08150. http://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08150.001 doi: 10.7554/eLife.08150.001
![]() |
[5] |
A. Imle, P. Kumberger, N. D. Schnellbacher, J. Fehr, P. Carrillo-Bustamante, J. Ales, et al., Experimental and computational analyses reveal that environmental restrictions shape HIV-1 spread in 3D cultures, Nat. Commun., 10 (2019), 2144. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09879-3 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09879-3
![]() |
[6] |
N. L. Komarova, D. Anghelina, I. Voznesensky, B. Trinité, D. N. Levy, D. Wodarz, Relative contribution of free-virus and synaptic transmission to the spread of HIV-1 through target cell populations, Biol. Lett., 9 (2013), 20121049. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.1049 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1049
![]() |
[7] |
M. Huber, A. Trkola, Humoral immunity to HIV-1: neutralization and beyond, J. Intern. Med., 262 (2007), 5–25. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01819.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01819.x
![]() |
[8] |
W. Hubner, G. P. McNerney, P. Chen, B. M. Dale, R. E. Gordon, F. Y. S. Chuang, et al., Quantitative 3D video microscopy of HIV transfer across T cell virological synapses, Science, 323 (2009), 1743–1747. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167525 doi: 10.1126/science.1167525
![]() |
[9] |
T. Guo, Z. P. Qiu, L. B. Rong, Analysis of an HIV model with immune responses and cell-to-cell transmission, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 43 (2020), 581–607. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-018-0699-5 doi: 10.1007/s40840-018-0699-5
![]() |
[10] |
Y. Wang, J. Liu, X. H. Zhang, J. M. Heffernan, An HIV stochastic model with cell-to-cell infection, B-cell immune response and distributed delay, J. Math. Biol., 86 (2023), 35. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-022-01863-8 doi: 10.1007/s00285-022-01863-8
![]() |
[11] |
J. L. Wang, J. Y. Lang, X. F. Zou, Analysis of an age structured HIV infection model with virus-to-cell infection and cell-to-cell transmission, Nonlinear Anal.-Real., 34 (2017), 75–96 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.08.001
![]() |
[12] |
Y. Wang, M. M. Lu, D. Q. Jiang, Dynamic behavior of a general stochastic HIV model with virus-to-cell infection, cell-to-cell transmission, immune response and distributed delays, J. Nonlinear Sci., 33 (2023), 97. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-023-09955-5 doi: 10.1007/s00332-023-09955-5
![]() |
[13] |
A. J. McMichael, S. L. Rowland-Jones, Cellular immune responses to HIV, Nature, 410 (2001), 980–987. http://doi.org/10.1038/35073658 doi: 10.1038/35073658
![]() |
[14] | W. E. Paul, Fundamental immunology, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2012. |
[15] |
S. F. Wang, D. Y. Zou, Global stability of in-host viral models with humoral immunity and intracellular delays, Appl. Math. Model., 36 (2012), 1313–1322. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.086 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.086
![]() |
[16] |
Y. T. Luo, L. Zhang, T. T. Zheng, Z. D. Teng, Analysis of a diffusive virus infection model with humoral immunity, cell-to-cell transmission and nonlinear incidence, Physica A, 535 (2019), 122415. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122415 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122415
![]() |
[17] |
A. M. Elaiw, A. A. Raezah, K. Hattaf, Stability of HIV-1 infection with saturated virus-target and infected-target incidences and CTL immune response, Int. J. Biomath., 10 (2017), 1750070. http://doi.org/10.1142/S179352451750070X doi: 10.1142/S179352451750070X
![]() |
[18] |
Z. R. Zhu, R. C. Wu, Y. Yang, Y. C. Xu, Modelling HIV dynamics with cell-to-cell transmission and CTL response, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 46 (2023), 6506–6528. http://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8921 doi: 10.1002/mma.8921
![]() |
[19] |
J. F. R. Kerr, A. H. Wyllie, A. R. Currie, Apoptosis: A basic biological phenomenon with wideranging implications in tissue kinetics, Br. J. Cancer, 26 (1972), 239–257. http://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1972.33 doi: 10.1038/bjc.1972.33
![]() |
[20] |
N. Selliah, T. H. Finkel, Biochemical mechanisms of HIV induced T cell apoptosis, Cell Death Differ., 8 (2001), 127–136. http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400822 doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400822
![]() |
[21] |
R. L. Fan, Y. P. Dong, G. Huang, Y. Takeuchi, Apoptosis in virus infection dynamics models, J. Biol. Dynam., 8 (2014), 20–41. http://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2014.895433 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2014.895433
![]() |
[22] |
M. Li, K. Guo, W. B. Ma, Uniform persistence and global attractivity in a delayed virus dynamic model with apoptosis and both virus-to-cell and cell-to-cell infections, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 975. http://doi.org/10.3390/math10060975 doi: 10.3390/math10060975
![]() |
[23] |
J. A. Zack, S. J. Arrigo, S. R. Weitsman, A. S. Go, A. Haislip, I. S. Y. Chen, HIV-1 entry into quiescent primary lymphocytes: molecular analysis reveals a labile, latent viral structure, Cell, 61 (1990), 213–222. http://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90802-L doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90802-L
![]() |
[24] |
J. A. Zack, A. M. Haislip, P. Krogstad, I. S. Chen, Incompletely reverse-transcribed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes in quiescent cells can function as intermediates in the retroviral life cycle, J. Virol., 66 (1992), 1717–1725. http://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.66.3.1717-1725.1992 doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.3.1717-1725.1992
![]() |
[25] |
P. Essunger, A. S. Perelson, Modeling HIV infection of CD4+ T-cell subpopulations, J. Theor. Biol., 170 (1994), 367–391. http://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1994.1199 doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1199
![]() |
[26] |
P. K. Srivastava, P. Chandra, Modeling the dynamics of HIV and CD4+ T cells during primary infection, Nonlinear Anal.-Real., 11 (2010), 612–618. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.10.037 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.10.037
![]() |
[27] |
H. F. Xu, Q. X. Zhu, W. X. Zheng, Exponential stability of stochastic nonlinear delay systems subject to multiple periodic impulses, IEEE T. Automat. Contr., 69 (2024), 2621–2628. http://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2023.3335005 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2023.3335005
![]() |
[28] |
L. C. Feng, Q. N. Zhang, C. Y. Zhang, D. X. Gong, Polynomial noises for nonlinear systems with nonlinear impulses and time-varying delays, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 1525. http://doi.org/10.3390/math10091525 doi: 10.3390/math10091525
![]() |
[29] |
Y. X. Zhao, L. S. Wang, Practical exponential stability of impulsive stochastic food chain system with time-varying delays, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 147. http://doi.org/10.3390/math11010147 doi: 10.3390/math11010147
![]() |
[30] | M. Martcheva, An introduction to mathematical epidemiology, New York: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7612-3 |
[31] |
S. S. Chen, C. Y. Cheng, Y. Takeuchi, Stability analysis in delayed within-host viral dynamics with both viral and cellular infections, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 442 (2016), 642–672. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.05.003
![]() |
[32] |
S. Pan, S. P. Chakrabarty, Threshold dynamics of HCV model with cell-to-cell transmission and a non-cytolytic cure in the presence of humoral immunity, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 61 (2018), 180–197. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.02.010 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.02.010
![]() |
[33] | J. K. Hale, S. M. V. Lunel, Introduction to functional differential equations, New York: Springer, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4342-7 |
[34] |
H. R. Thieme, Convergence results and a Poincaré-Bendixson trichotomy for asymptotically autonomous differential equations, J. Math. Biol., 30 (1992), 755–763. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173267 doi: 10.1007/BF00173267
![]() |
[35] |
P. Wu, H. Y. Zhao, Mathematical analysis of an age-structured HIV/AIDS epidemic model with HAART and spatial diffusion, Nonlinear Anal.-Real., 60 (2021), 103289. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2021.103289 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2021.103289
![]() |
[36] |
G. D. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. J. Guan, W. J. Li, Stability analysis of multi-point boundary conditions for fractional differential equation with non-instantaneous integral impulse, Math. Biosci. Eng., 20 (2023), 7020–7041. http://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023303 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023303
![]() |
[37] |
T. T. Zheng, L. F. Nie, Z. D. Teng, Y. T. Luo, S. F. Wang, Analysis of an age-structured dengue model with multiple strains and cross immunity, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 50. http://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2021.1.50 doi: 10.14232/ejqtde.2021.1.50
![]() |
[38] |
P. Wu, Z. S. Feng, X. B. Zhang, Global dynamics of an age-space structured HIV/AIDS model with viral load-dependent infection and conversion rates, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 412 (2022), 114309. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2022.114309 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114309
![]() |
[39] |
L. Q. Zhou, Z. X. Zhao, Q. X. Zhu, R. Zhou, T. W. Huang, Global polynomial stabilization of impulsive neural networks with bidirectional proportional delays, IEEE T. Netw. Sci. Eng., 11 (2024), 471–484. http://doi.org/10.1109/tnse.2023.3300907 doi: 10.1109/tnse.2023.3300907
![]() |
Symbol | Description | Value | Source |
U | Concentration of healthy CD4+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
H | Concentration of HTLV-1 infected CD4+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
C | Concentration of healthy CD8+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
M | Concentration of HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
α | Production rate of healthy CD4+ T cells | 10 cells μL−1 day−1 | [15,29] |
ρU | Mortality rate of healthy CD4+ T cells | 0.01 day−1 | [30,31] |
ηUH | Incidence rate due to CTC contact between | varied | – |
HTLV-1-infected and healthy CD4+ T cells | |||
ρH | Mortality rate of HTLV-1 infected CD4+ T cells | 0.05 day−1 | [11,12,14] |
χ | killing rate of HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells | 0.02 cells −1 μL day−1 | [11,12,14,32] |
due to CD8+ T cells | |||
γ | Generation rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 20 cells μL−1 day−1 | [33] |
σ | Activation rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 0.2 cells−1 μL day−1 | [34] |
ρC | Mortality rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 0.06 day−1 | [33] |
ηCM | Incidence rate due to CTC contact between | varied | – |
HTLV-2-infected and healthy CD8+ T cells | |||
ρM | Mortality rate of HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells | 0.3 day−1 | Assumed |
Equilibrium | Existence condition | Stability condition |
EP0=(U0,0,C0,0) | - | R1≤1 and R2≤1 |
EP1=(U1,H1,C1,0) | R1>1 | R1>1 and R4≤1 |
EP2=(U2,0,C2,M2) | R2>1 | R2>1 and R3≤1 |
EP3=(U3,H3,C3,M3) | R3>1, R4>1 | R3>1 and R4>1 |
Scenario | Equilibrium | Re(λk)<0,k=1,2,3,4 | Stability |
1 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−1.72,−0.13,−0.06,−0.01) | stable |
2 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (3.28,−0.13,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP1=(923.91,0.08,459.46,0) | (−0.02,−0.02,−0.07,−0.01) | stable | |
3 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−5.72,0.37,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP2=(1000,0,150,36.67) | (−2.05,−0.07,−0.07,−0.01) | stable | |
4 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−3.72,1.03,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP2=(1000,0,75,51.67) | (1.45,−0.13,−0.13,−0.01) | unstable | |
EP3=(516.67,3.12,75,207.58) | (−0.13,−0.13,−0.01,−0.01) | stable |
Parameters β | α | ηUH | ρC | ρU | χ | γ | ρH |
Value of SR1β | 1 | 1 | 0.9970 | −1 | −0.9970 | −0.9970 | −0.0030 |
Parameters β | γ | ηCM | ρC | ρM |
Value of SR2β | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 |
Symbol | Description | Value | Source |
U | Concentration of healthy CD4+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
H | Concentration of HTLV-1 infected CD4+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
C | Concentration of healthy CD8+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
M | Concentration of HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells | cells μL−1 | – |
α | Production rate of healthy CD4+ T cells | 10 cells μL−1 day−1 | [15,29] |
ρU | Mortality rate of healthy CD4+ T cells | 0.01 day−1 | [30,31] |
ηUH | Incidence rate due to CTC contact between | varied | – |
HTLV-1-infected and healthy CD4+ T cells | |||
ρH | Mortality rate of HTLV-1 infected CD4+ T cells | 0.05 day−1 | [11,12,14] |
χ | killing rate of HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T cells | 0.02 cells −1 μL day−1 | [11,12,14,32] |
due to CD8+ T cells | |||
γ | Generation rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 20 cells μL−1 day−1 | [33] |
σ | Activation rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 0.2 cells−1 μL day−1 | [34] |
ρC | Mortality rate of healthy CD8+ T cells | 0.06 day−1 | [33] |
ηCM | Incidence rate due to CTC contact between | varied | – |
HTLV-2-infected and healthy CD8+ T cells | |||
ρM | Mortality rate of HTLV-2-infected CD8+ T cells | 0.3 day−1 | Assumed |
Equilibrium | Existence condition | Stability condition |
EP0=(U0,0,C0,0) | - | R1≤1 and R2≤1 |
EP1=(U1,H1,C1,0) | R1>1 | R1>1 and R4≤1 |
EP2=(U2,0,C2,M2) | R2>1 | R2>1 and R3≤1 |
EP3=(U3,H3,C3,M3) | R3>1, R4>1 | R3>1 and R4>1 |
Scenario | Equilibrium | Re(λk)<0,k=1,2,3,4 | Stability |
1 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−1.72,−0.13,−0.06,−0.01) | stable |
2 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (3.28,−0.13,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP1=(923.91,0.08,459.46,0) | (−0.02,−0.02,−0.07,−0.01) | stable | |
3 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−5.72,0.37,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP2=(1000,0,150,36.67) | (−2.05,−0.07,−0.07,−0.01) | stable | |
4 | EP0=(1000,0,333.33,0) | (−3.72,1.03,−0.06,−0.01) | unstable |
EP2=(1000,0,75,51.67) | (1.45,−0.13,−0.13,−0.01) | unstable | |
EP3=(516.67,3.12,75,207.58) | (−0.13,−0.13,−0.01,−0.01) | stable |
Parameters β | α | ηUH | ρC | ρU | χ | γ | ρH |
Value of SR1β | 1 | 1 | 0.9970 | −1 | −0.9970 | −0.9970 | −0.0030 |
Parameters β | γ | ηCM | ρC | ρM |
Value of SR2β | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 |