
In this paper, we study the analytical solutions of two-dimensional fractional-order linear system DαtX(t)=AX(t) described by fractional differential equations, where D is the fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio sense and A=(aij)2×2 is nonsingular coefficient matrix with aij∈R. The analytical solutions of fractional-order linear system will be compared to the solution of classical linear system. Examples are provided to characterize the behavior of the solutions for fractional-order linear system.
Citation: Shuo Wang, Juan Liu, Xindong Zhang. Properties of solutions for fractional-order linear system with differential equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15704-15713. doi: 10.3934/math.2022860
[1] | Zhoujin Cui . Solutions of some typical nonlinear differential equations with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14139-14153. doi: 10.3934/math.2022779 |
[2] | Amjid Ali, Teruya Minamoto, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . A novel numerical method for solution of fractional partial differential equations involving the ψ-Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2137-2153. doi: 10.3934/math.2023110 |
[3] | Sadia Arshad, Iram Saleem, Ali Akgül, Jianfei Huang, Yifa Tang, Sayed M Eldin . A novel numerical method for solving the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9535-9556. doi: 10.3934/math.2023481 |
[4] | Anumanthappa Ganesh, Swaminathan Deepa, Dumitru Baleanu, Shyam Sundar Santra, Osama Moaaz, Vediyappan Govindan, Rifaqat Ali . Hyers-Ulam-Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional differential equations with two caputo derivative using fractional fourier transform. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1791-1810. doi: 10.3934/math.2022103 |
[5] | Khalid K. Ali, K. R. Raslan, Amira Abd-Elall Ibrahim, Mohamed S. Mohamed . On study the fractional Caputo-Fabrizio integro differential equation including the fractional q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18206-18222. doi: 10.3934/math.2023925 |
[6] | Muhammad Akram, Ghulam Muhammad, Tofigh Allahviranloo, Ghada Ali . A solving method for two-dimensional homogeneous system of fuzzy fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 228-263. doi: 10.3934/math.2023011 |
[7] | M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Osama Y. Ababneh, Rasool Shah, Amjad khan, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Numerical analysis of fractional-order Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations with non-singular kernel operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2308-2336. doi: 10.3934/math.2023120 |
[8] | Humaira Yasmin, Aljawhara H. Almuqrin . Efficient solutions for time fractional Sawada-Kotera, Ito, and Kaup-Kupershmidt equations using an analytical technique. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20441-20466. doi: 10.3934/math.2024994 |
[9] | Ali Turab, Hozan Hilmi, Juan L.G. Guirao, Shabaz Jalil, Nejmeddine Chorfi, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed . The Rishi Transform method for solving multi-high order fractional differential equations with constant coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3798-3809. doi: 10.3934/math.2024187 |
[10] | Kangqun Zhang . Existence and uniqueness of positive solution of a nonlinear differential equation with higher order Erdélyi-Kober operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1358-1372. doi: 10.3934/math.2024067 |
In this paper, we study the analytical solutions of two-dimensional fractional-order linear system DαtX(t)=AX(t) described by fractional differential equations, where D is the fractional derivative in the Caputo-Fabrizio sense and A=(aij)2×2 is nonsingular coefficient matrix with aij∈R. The analytical solutions of fractional-order linear system will be compared to the solution of classical linear system. Examples are provided to characterize the behavior of the solutions for fractional-order linear system.
A fractional-order system means a system described by a fractional differential equation or fractional integral equation or by a system of such equations. A fractional differential equation is an equation which contains fractional derivative. There are many forms of fractional derivatives, such as Riemann-Liouville, Grünwald-Letnikov, Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives, one can refer to [1]. Fractional differential equations have been applied in various fields, and have been studied in the literature, for example, Lin and Xu studied the time-fractional diffusion equation using finite difference/spectral approximations in [2]; Zhuang et al. [3] considered the numerical methods for the variable-order fractional advection diffusion equation with a nonlinear source term; Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel was studied by Losada and Nieto in [4]; Fardi and Khan considered the finite difference-spectral method for fractal mobile/immobiletransport model based on Caputo-Fabrizio derivative[5]; Solution of a fractional logistic ordinary differential equation was obtained by Nieto in [6]. It has been found that the behavior of many physical systems can be properly described by using the fractional-order system theory. Generally speaking, the exact solutions of fractional differential equations are difficulty solved by some analytic methods. However, for some special fractional differential equations, we can still obtain their analytical solutions, such as fractional-order linear system involving Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative was proposed by Caputo and Fabrizio [7]. Algahtani [8] represented the model by Allen-Cahn with both derivatives (Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio) in order to see their difference in a real world problem. Akman et al. [9] computed Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives of some known functions both theoretically and numerically. Baleanu et al. constructed a fractional order model of 2019 coronavirus disease transmission using Caputo-Fabrizio derivative in [10], and proposed a new fractional model for human liver involving Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with the exponential kernel in [11]. Aydogan et al. [12] investigated a new version of the mathematical model of Rabies disease by using the fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. Additional researches on Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative can be found in [13,14,15,16,17,18], among others. There are many results about autonomous system, one can refer to [19,20,21,22]. Also, the fractional-order system has been studied by many scholars [23,24,25].
In this paper, we consider the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order real linear system. The main goal of this paper is to obtain the analytical solutions of fractional-order linear system, where the fractional derivative is in the Caputo-Fabrizio sense. The system is of the form
DαtX(t)=AX(t), | (1.1) |
where 0<α<1, X(t)=[x(t),y(t)]′ and A=(a11a12a21a22). The fractional derivative Dαtx(t) is Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative of order α, defined as (one can see [4])
Dαtx(t)=(2−α)M(α)2(1−α)∫t0e−α1−α(t−s)x′(s)ds. | (1.2) |
In [4], we know that M(α)=22−α. Thus, we have (one can see [7])
Dαtx(t)=11−α∫t0e−α1−α(t−s)x′(s)ds. | (1.3) |
For Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, the corresponding fractional integral of a function x(t) is
Iαtx(t)=(1−α)[x(t)−x0]+α∫t0x(s)ds, | (1.4) |
where x0=x(0) is the initial condition. By (1.4), if x0≠0 and x(t)=x0e−α1−αt, then we can obtain that Iαtx(t)=0. Hence the kernel of the operator Iαt is the one-dimensional subspace generated by e−α1−αt. This is quite different to the case of the usual fractional where Iαtx(t)=0 implies that x(t)=0. Thus, we have
IαtDαtx(t)=x(t)+c, | (1.5) |
where c is an arbitrary constant. The behavior of classical fractional derivative (Rieman-Liouville or Caputo) is similar to the classical integer order derivative in the sense that it satisfies that the derivative of the integral is the same function. However, for the new Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, we have
DαtIαtx(t)=x(t)−x0e−α1−αt. | (1.6) |
Let x(t) be the solution of (1.5), by (1.5) and (1.6), then x(t) is the solution of (1.6) with a kernel e−α1−αt.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we solove the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order real linear system and obtain the analytical solutions which coincides with the solutions of classical linear system when α→1−. In Section 3, we plot the solutions of system (1.1) under given conditions at different values of α.
In this section, we consider fractional-order real linear system (1.1) under the assumption that det(A)≠0. According to the theoretical knowledge of linear algebra, if A is a nonsingular matrix, then there exists a nonsingular matrix T such that B=T−1AT and X(t)=T˜X(t), where B is a Jordan normal form and ˜X(t)=[u(t),v(t)]′. The corresponding characteristic polynomial of A is
P(λ)=det(A−λI)=λ2−pλ+q with p=a11+a22 and q=a11a22−a21a22, | (2.1) |
which has zeros λ=12(p−√p2−4q) and μ=12(p+√p2−4q). Thus, the system (1.1) will become
Dαt˜X(t)=T−1AT˜X(t)=B˜X(t), | (2.2) |
where B is one of the following normal forms:
L(λ,μ)=(λ00μ),M(λ)=(λ01λ),R(η,γ)=(ηγ−γη). |
Here λ,μ,η and γ are real numbers with μ≠0 and γ>0. If λ=μ≠0, then it will become a special case of L(λ,μ). The above three cases are denoted by L for left, M for middle and R for right, respectively. Therefore, we need to consider the case one by one.
If A=L(λ,μ), then system (1.1) will become as follows
{Dαtx(t)=λx(t),Dαty(t)=μy(t). | (2.3) |
Observe that for α=1, system (2.3) is recovered to the classical linear system as follows
{x′(t)=λx(t),y′(t)=μy(t), | (2.4) |
which has the solutions x(t)=c1eλt and y(t)=c2eμt.
The analytical solutions of system (2.3) can be obtained by the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1. Let x0 and y0 be the initial conditions of system (2.3). Then the solutions of system (2.3) are x(t)=c1eλα1−λ+λαt and y(t)=c2eμα1−μ+μαt, where c1=x0 and c2=y0.
Proof. If x(t) and y(t) are the solutions of (2.3), by (1.4) and (1.5), interating we get
{x(t)+c1=λIαtx(t)=λ(1−α)[x(t)−x(0)]+λα∫t0x(s)ds,y(t)+c2=μIαty(t)=μ(1−α)[y(t)−y(0)]+μα∫t0y(s)ds. | (2.5) |
Taking the first derivative both sides of (2.5), we get
{x′(t)=λ(1−α)x′(t)+λαx(t),y′(t)=μ(1−α)y′(t)+μαy(t). | (2.6) |
By (2.6), for 1−λ+λα≠0 and 1−μ+μα≠0, the analytical solutions of the system (2.3) with 0<α<1 are given by
x(t)=c1eλα1−λ+λαt and y(t)=c2eμα1−μ+μαt, | (2.7) |
where c1=x0 and c2=y0 are real constants. This proves the theorem.
If A=M(λ), then system (1.1) will become as follows
{Dαtx(t)=λx(t),Dαty(t)=x(t)+λy(t). | (2.8) |
Observe that for α=1, system (2.8) is recovered to the classical linear system as follows
{x′(t)=λx(t),y′(t)=x(t)+λy(t), | (2.9) |
which has the solutions x(t)=c1eλt and y(t)=(c1t+c2)eλt.
The analytical solutions of system (2.8) can be obtained by the following theorem.
Theorem 2.2. Let x0 and y0 be the initial conditions of system (2.8). Then the solutions of system (2.8) are x(t)=c1eλα1−λ+λαt and y(t)=(c1α(1−λ+λα)2t+c2)eλα1−λ+λαt, where c1=x0 and c2=y0.
Proof. If x(t) and y(t) are the solutions of (2.8), by (1.4) and (1.5), interating we get
{x(t)+c1=λ(1−α)[x(t)−x0]+λα∫t0x(s)ds,y(t)+c2=(1−α)[x(t)−x0]+α∫t0x(s)ds+λ(1−α)[y(t)−y(0)]+λα∫t0y(s)ds. | (2.10) |
Taking the first derivative both sides of (2.10), we get
{x′(t)=λ(1−α)x′(t)+λαx(t),y′(t)=(1−α)x′(t)+αx(t)+λ(1−α)y′(t)+λαy(t). | (2.11) |
By (2.11), for 1−λ+λα≠0, the analytical solutions of the system (2.8) with 0<α<1 are given by
x(t)=c1eλα1−λ+λαt and y(t)=(c1α(1−λ+λα)2t+c2)eλα1−λ+λαt, | (2.12) |
where c1=x0 and c2=y0 are real constants. This proves the theorem.
Similarly, if A=R(η,γ), then system (1.1) will become as follows
{Dαtx(t)=ηx(t)+γy(t),Dαty(t)=−γx(t)+ηy(t). | (2.13) |
Observe that for α=1, system (2.13) is recovered to the classical linear system as follows
{x′(t)=ηx(t)+γy(t),y′(t)=−γx(t)+ηy(t), | (2.14) |
which has the solutions x(t)=c1eηtcos(−γt+c2) and y(t)=c1eηtsin(−γt+c2). Where c1,c2 satisfy that x0=c1cosc2 and y0=c1sinc2.
The analytical solutions of system (2.13) can be obtained by the following theorem.
Theorem 2.3. Let x0 and y0 be the initial conditions of system (2.13). Then the solutions of system (2.13) are x(t)=c1eη1tcos(−γ1t+c2) and y(t)=c1eη1tsin(−γ1t+c2), where η1=ηα−(α−α2)(η2+γ2)(1−η+ηα)2+(γ−γα)2 and γ1=γα(1−η+ηα)2+(γ−γα)2, and c1,c2 satisfy that x0=c1cosc2 and y0=c1sinc2.
Proof. If x(t) and y(t) are the solutions of (2.13), by (1.4) and (1.5), interating we get
{x(t)+c1=η(1−α)[x(t)−x0]+ηα∫t0x(s)ds+γ(1−α)[y(t)−y0]+γα∫t0y(s)ds,y(t)+c2=−γ(1−α)[x(t)−x0]−γα∫t0x(s)ds+η(1−α)[y(t)−y0]+ηα∫t0y(s)ds. | (2.15) |
Taking the first derivative both sides of (2.15), we get
{x′(t)=η(1−α)x′(t)+ηαx(t)+γ(1−α)y′(t)+γαy(t),y′(t)=−γ(1−α)x′(t)−γαx(t)+η(1−α)y′(t)+ηαy(t). | (2.16) |
By (2.16), we get
{x′(t)=η1x′(t)+γ1y(t),y′(t)=−γ1x′(t)+η1y(t), | (2.17) |
where η1=ηα−(α−α2)(η2+γ2)(1−η+ηα)2+(γ−γα)2 and γ1=γα(1−η+ηα)2+(γ−γα)2.
The system (2.17) can be solved explicitly by introducing polar coordinates x=ρcosθ and y=ρsinθ, as follows. First note that
xdxdt+ydydt=ρdρdt and xdydt−ydxdt=ρ2dθdt. |
It follows that
ρ′(t)=η1ρ and θ′(t)=−γ1, | (2.18) |
thus, the solutions of system (2.18) may be expressed in the form
ρ(t)=c1eη1t and θ(t)=−γ1t+c2, | (2.19) |
where c1=ρ(0) and c2=θ(0).
By (2.19), the solutions of system (2.13) may be expressed in the form
x(t)=c1eη1tcos(−γ1t+c2) and y(t)=c1eη1tsin(−γ1t+c2). | (2.20) |
This proves the theorem.
In this section, we plot the solutions of system (1.1) under given conditions at different values of α. We consider the following three cases, that are A=L(λ,μ), A=M(λ) and A=R(η,γ).
For A=L(λ,μ). If λ=−1 or λ=2, then the solutions x(t) of system (2.3) for different α are shown in Figure 1 (similarly, the solutions of y(t) can be obtained for given μ). For λ=−1, the results are shown in Figure 1 (a), which shows that x(t)→0 as t→+∞ and the speed of x(t) approaching zero gradually becomes faster with the increase of α. For λ=2, by Theorem 2.1, we know that α≠1/2, and α=1/2 is the demarcation line, the results are shown in Figure 1 (b). If α>1/2, then x(t) is increasing with the evolution of time and the speed increase of x(t) becomes faster with the decrease of α. If α<1/2, then x(t) is decreasing with the evolution of time and the speed decrease of x(t) becomes faster with the increase of α.
For A=M(λ). If λ=−1 or λ=2, then the solutions y(t) of system (2.8) for different α are shown in Figure 2 (x(t) can be obtained as in system (2.3)). For λ=−1, the results are shown in Figure 2k (a), which shows that x(t)→0 as t→+∞ and the speed of x(t) approaching zero gradually becomes faster with the increase of α. For λ=2, by Theorem 2.2, we know that α≠1/2, and α=1/2 is the demarcation line. If α>1/2, then x(t) is increasing with the evolution of time and the speed increase of x(t) becomes faster with the decrease of α, the result is shown in Figure 2 (b). Figure 2 (c) shows the results for λ=2 and α<1/2, on the whole, x(t) is decreasing with the evolution of time and the speed decrease of x(t) becomes faster with the increase of α. However, a special phenomenon will occur in this case, that is x(t) will increase firstly and then decrease when α reaches a critical value, in particular, this phenomenon is more obvious when α→0.5.
For A=R(η,γ). If η=1/100, γ=√199/100 and c1=ρ(0)=2, c2=θ(0)=3, then the solutions x(t) of system (2.13) are shown in Figure 3 (similarly, the Figure of y(t) can be obtained). By Theorem 2.3, we know that x(t)=2cos(−√199t/199+3) when α=1/2. If α>1/2, then x(t) behaves an oscillating phenomenon and the amplitude becomes wide with the evolution of the time (Figure 3k (a)). If α<1/2, then x(t) behaves an oscillating phenomenon and tends to zero with the evolution of the time. In particular, the speed of x(t) approaching zero will firstly increase with the decrease of α. When α reaches a critical value, the speed of x(t) approaching zero will slow down with the decrease of α (Figure 3 (b)).
In this paper, we study the analytical solutions for fractional-order linear system involving Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. This problem is a natural generalization of the classical linear system. Compared with classical linear system, the solutions of fractional-order linear system have richer behaviors and abnormal phenomena for different α. From the examples, we can find that the results of this paper can be applied not only to fractional order linear system when 0<α<1, but also to classical linear systems as α=1, which means that the classical linear system is the limit form of fractional system. In the future, fractional-order nonlinear system can also be studied.
We are very grateful to both referees for their carefully reading the paper and most valuable comments and suggestions.
The paper is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China (No. 2022D01E13), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11861068, No. 11761071), Guizhou Key Laboratory of Big Data Statistical Analysis, China (No. [2019]5103) and the Scientific research foundation for Outstanding young teachers of Xinjiang Normal University, China (No. XJNU202112).
This work does not have any conflict of interest.
[1] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, San Diego: Academic Press, 1999. |
[2] |
Y. M. Lin, C. J. Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 1533–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001
![]() |
[3] |
P. Zhuang, F. Liu, V. Anh, I. Turner, Numerical methods for the variable-order fractional advection diffusion equation with a nonlinear source term, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 47 (2009), 1760–1781. https://doi.org/10.1137/080730597 doi: 10.1137/080730597
![]() |
[4] | J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel, Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 87–92. |
[5] |
M. Fardi, Y. Khan, A novel finite difference-spectral method for fractal mobile/immobiletransport model based on Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Chaos Solitons Fract., 143 (2021), 110573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110573 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110573
![]() |
[6] |
J. J. Nieto, Solution of a fractional logistic ordinary differential equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 123 (2022), 107568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107568 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107568
![]() |
[7] | M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85. |
[8] |
O. J. J. Algahtani, Comparing the Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with fractional order: Allen Cahn model, Chaos Solitons Fract., 89 (2016), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.026 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.026
![]() |
[9] |
T. Akman, B. Yıldız, D. Baleanu, New discretization of Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Comput. Appl. Math., 37 (2018), 3307–3333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-017-0514-1 doi: 10.1007/s40314-017-0514-1
![]() |
[10] |
D. Baleanu, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, A fractional differential equation model for the COVID-19 transmission by using the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 299. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02762-2 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02762-2
![]() |
[11] |
D. Baleanu, A. Jajarmi, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, A new study on the mathematical modelling of human liver with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Chaos. Solitons Fract., 134 (2020), 109705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109705 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109705
![]() |
[12] |
S. M. Aydogan, D. Baleanu, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, On the mathematical model of Rabies by using the fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 382. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02798-4 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02798-4
![]() |
[13] |
M. Z. Xu, Y. J. Jian, Unsteady rotating electroosmotic flow with time-fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Appl. Math. Lett., 100 (2020), 106015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2019.106015 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.106015
![]() |
[14] |
M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, On the singular kernels for fractional derivatives. Some applications to partial differential equations, Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl., 7 (2021), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.18576/pfda/070201 doi: 10.18576/pfda/070201
![]() |
[15] | J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Fractional integral associated to fractional derivatives with nonsingular kernels, Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl., 7 (2021), 137–143. |
[16] |
F. Haq, I. Mahariq, T. Abdeljawad, N. Maliki, A new approach for the qualitative study of vector born disease using Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ., 37 (2021), 1809–1818. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22728 doi: 10.1002/num.22728
![]() |
[17] |
N. Harrouche, S. Momani, S. Hasan, M. Al-Smadi, Computational algorithm for solving drug pharmacokinetic model under uncertainty with nonsingular kernel type Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 60 (2021), 4347–4362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.016 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.016
![]() |
[18] |
T. W. Zhang, Y. K. Li, Exponential Euler scheme of multi-delay Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 124 (2022), 107709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107709 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107709
![]() |
[19] | W. Walter, Ordinary differential equations, New York: Springer-verlag, 1998. |
[20] |
S. P. Bhaty, D. S. Bernstein, Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 38 (2000), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012997321358 doi: 10.1137/S0363012997321358
![]() |
[21] | R. P. Agarwal, D. O'Regan, An introduction to ordinary differential equations, Springer Science Business Media LLC, 2008. |
[22] |
J. C. Cortés, A. Navarro-Quiles, J. V. Romero, M. D. Roselló, Full solution of random autonomous first-order linear systems of difference equations. Application to construct random phase portrait for planar systems, Appl. Math. Lett., 68 (2017), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2016.12.015 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2016.12.015
![]() |
[23] |
W. M. Ahmad, W. M. Harb, On nonlinear control design for autonomous chaotic systems of integer and fractional orders, Chaos Solitons Fract., 18 (2003), 693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00644-6 doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00644-6
![]() |
[24] |
C. G. Li, G. R. Chen, Chaos in the fractional order Chen system and its control, Chaos Solitons Fract., 22 (2004), 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2004.02.035 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.02.035
![]() |
[25] |
S. T. Kingni, V. T. Pham, S. Jafari, G. R. Kol, P. Woafo, Three-dimensional chaotic autonomous system with a circular equilibrium: Analysis, circuit implementation and its fractional-order form, Circuits Syst. Signal Process., 35 (2016), 1933–1948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-016-0259-x doi: 10.1007/s00034-016-0259-x
![]() |
1. | Bohui Yang, Ziyang Luo, Xindong Zhang, Quan Tang, Juan Liu, Mohammad Alomari, Trajectories and Singular Points of Two-Dimensional Fractional-Order Autonomous Systems, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/3722011 | |
2. | Md Samshad Hussain Ansari, Muslim Malik, Dumitru Baleanu, Controllability of Prabhakar Fractional Dynamical Systems, 2024, 23, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-023-00919-4 | |
3. | Li Cheng, Wen-Xiu Ma, Similarity Transformations and Nonlocal Reduced Integrable Nonlinear Schrödinger Type Equations, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 4110, 10.3390/math11194110 |