Research article Special Issues

Modeling fractional-order dynamics of Syphilis via Mittag-Leffler law

  • Syphilis is one the most dangerous sexually transmitted disease which is common in the world. In this work, we formulate and analyze a mathematical model of Syphilis with an emphasis on treatment in the sense of Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) and Atangana-Baleanu (Mittag-Leffler law) derivatives. The basic reproduction number of the CF model which presents information on the spread of the disease is determined. The model's steady states were found, and the disease-free state's local and global stability are established based on the basic reproduction number. The existence and uniqueness of solutions for both Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu derivative in the Caputo sense are established. Numerical simulations were carried out to support the analytical solution, which indicates that the fractional-order derivatives influence the dynamics of the spread of Syphilis in any community induced with the disease.

    Citation: E. Bonyah, C. W. Chukwu, M. L. Juga, Fatmawati. Modeling fractional-order dynamics of Syphilis via Mittag-Leffler law[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8367-8389. doi: 10.3934/math.2021485

    Related Papers:

    [1] Rashid Jan, Adil Khurshaid, Hammad Alotaibi, Mustafa Inc . A robust study of the transmission dynamics of syphilis infection through non-integer derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6206-6232. doi: 10.3934/math.2023314
    [2] Bahar Acay, Ramazan Ozarslan, Erdal Bas . Fractional physical models based on falling body problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2608-2628. doi: 10.3934/math.2020170
    [3] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046
    [4] Muhammad Sajid Iqbal, Nauman Ahmed, Ali Akgül, Ali Raza, Muhammad Shahzad, Zafar Iqbal, Muhammad Rafiq, Fahd Jarad . Analysis of the fractional diarrhea model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13000-13018. doi: 10.3934/math.2022720
    [5] Sabri T. M. Thabet, Reem M. Alraimy, Imed Kedim, Aiman Mukheimer, Thabet Abdeljawad . Exploring the solutions of a financial bubble model via a new fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8587-8614. doi: 10.3934/math.2025394
    [6] Ahu Ercan . Comparative analysis for fractional nonlinear Sturm-Liouville equations with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13325-13343. doi: 10.3934/math.2022736
    [7] Rahat Zarin, Amir Khan, Pushpendra Kumar, Usa Wannasingha Humphries . Fractional-order dynamics of Chagas-HIV epidemic model with different fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18897-18924. doi: 10.3934/math.20221041
    [8] Mdi Begum Jeelani, Abeer S. Alnahdi, Mohammed A. Almalahi, Mohammed S. Abdo, Hanan A. Wahash, M. A. Abdelkawy . Study of the Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo type fractional system with a generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2001-2018. doi: 10.3934/math.2022115
    [9] Abdon Atangana . Fractional derivatives, dimensions, and geometric interpretation: An answer to your worries. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2562-2588. doi: 10.3934/math.2025119
    [10] Veliappan Vijayaraj, Chokkalingam Ravichandran, Thongchai Botmart, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Kasthurisamy Jothimani . Existence and data dependence results for neutral fractional order integro-differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1055-1071. doi: 10.3934/math.2023052
  • Syphilis is one the most dangerous sexually transmitted disease which is common in the world. In this work, we formulate and analyze a mathematical model of Syphilis with an emphasis on treatment in the sense of Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) and Atangana-Baleanu (Mittag-Leffler law) derivatives. The basic reproduction number of the CF model which presents information on the spread of the disease is determined. The model's steady states were found, and the disease-free state's local and global stability are established based on the basic reproduction number. The existence and uniqueness of solutions for both Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu derivative in the Caputo sense are established. Numerical simulations were carried out to support the analytical solution, which indicates that the fractional-order derivatives influence the dynamics of the spread of Syphilis in any community induced with the disease.



    Syphilis has remained a persistent human health threat in both developed and developing countries [1,2]. It is a sexually transmitted infection caused by the bacterium Treponema Palladium which is said to infect approximately 12 million people around the globe yearly. Syphilis is transmitted from person to person by direct contact with a syphilitic sore, known as a chancre. Chancres can occur on or around the external genitals, in the vagina, around the anus, rectum, or in or around the mouth. Transmission of Syphilis can occur during vaginal, anal, or oral sex [3]. It has several symptoms, most of which are also common to other diseases. If not properly treated, it can progress from primary to secondary and finally to the disease's tertiary stage.

    Syphilis infection is characterized by an ulcerative chancre signaling the beginning of the primary stage of the disease [4]. After exposure and infection, the primary incubation period is about 25 days, although available data suggest that this period can be between 3 and 4 weeks [5] (3–6 weeks according to the CDC [3]). If not treated, the disease progresses to the second stage with symptoms like skin rashes and mucous membrane lesions [4] and an incubation period of about 46 days [5]. Following the secondary symptoms, the infection progresses to the tertiary and latent stage where the disease remains in the body and can reappear or even damage internal organs or lead to death [3,4].

    Syphilis can be treated with antibiotics such as penicillin [4,6]. After treatment and recovery from the infection, individuals may develop transitory immunity to reinfection before becoming susceptible again [4], although it seems immunity depends on the stage of the disease at which treatment was implemented [4,5,7].

    One of the early triumphs of mathematical epidemiology was a formulation to predict the dynamics of a disease. Mathematical models use some basic assumptions and mathematics to find parameters for various infectious diseases and use those parameters to calculate the effects of possible interventions [8,9,10,11,12,13]. A lot of these models have been developed to study the dynamics of Syphilis transmission. One of the models included the different stages of the disease and treatment [5], while another used an ordinary differential equations (ODE) to model heterosexual Syphilis transmission in East Vancouver. Here, they combined the later stages of Syphilis but partitioned the population into multiple groups based on sex, sexual activity, and age [14]. In a recent study, Milner and Zhao [15] presented an ODE model based on partial immunity and vaccination (assuming a successful vaccine is developed), and showed that there exists backward bifurcation for some parameter values. More recently, Iboi and Okuonghae [16] have designed a new multi-stage deterministic model for syphilis transmission to assess the role of transient loss of immunity in the transmission process. Despite the diversity, various methodologies in the existing Syphilis models are integer-order models that give inaccurate predictions due to their lack of memory effect.

    In the last few years, Fractional calculus has gained a lot of popularity because of its application in many areas and its ability to consider the memory effect, which is a natural occurrence in several biological models. Riemann and Liouville first proposed a fractional derivative with a singular kernel. Next Caputo and Fabrizio in [17] presented a new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, which proved to be fair and applied by many researchers. A few years ago, Atangana and Baleanu developed a new operator which is based on the generalized Mittag-Leffler function where the kernel is non-singular and non-local [18]. Several non-integer order models in the sense of Caputo-Fabrizio and in the sense of Atangana-Baleanu have been developed [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. However, none of them compared the results of syphilis transmission dynamics in the sense of Caputo-Fabrizio (CF), with that in the Atangana-Baleanu derivative in the Caputo sense (ABC). In this paper, we develop a mathematical model to study the dynamics of Syphilis transmission via Mittag-Leffler law and compare the results obtained via the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative.

    The first Section is a brief introduction, followed by the model formulation in Section 2. We give the model analysis in Section 3 and introduce the CF operator in Section 4, together with the preliminaries and model properties. Section 5 presents a numerical scheme for the ABC model, while Section 6 presents the numerical simulations followed by the conclusion.

    In this section, we describe the transmission dynamics of Syphilis disease. The model comprises of five compartments, which are the Susceptible individuals (S(t)), Exposed individuals (E(t)), individuals at the early stage of Syphilis infection (I(t)), individuals at the late stage of Syphilis infection (L(t)), and individuals treated of Syphilis infection (T(t)). The Susceptible individuals are recruited into the population at a rate Π. These individuals come in contact with those in I(t) and L(t) and contract the disease at a force of infection λ, where

    λ=β(I(t)+γL(t)),

    and β is the probability that a contact between a susceptible individual and an infectious individual will result to an infection. After being exposed to the bacteria Treponema pallidum, they progress to the class I(t) at a rate ρ1. Furthermore, the individuals in I(t) can either progress to the class L(t) at a rate ρ2 or recover after treatment from the Syphilis infection at rate ν1. On the other hand, the treated individuals can also become exposed again to Syphilis upon interaction with individuals in I(t) or L(t) at a rate ωλ, while those at the later stage of the infection can also be treated at a rate ν2. We assume that individuals in all the compartments have a natural mortality rate of μ. The flow diagram for the model is shown in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Syphilis model flow diagram.

    The model diagram in Figure 1 together with the assumptions gives rise to the following system of equations:

    dSdt=ΠλSμS,dEdt=λS+λωTQ0E,dIdt=ρ1EQ1I,dLdt=ρ2IQ2L,dTdt=ν1I+ν2LμTλωT (2.1)

    where Q0=(μ+ρ1),Q1=(ρ2+ν1+μ) and Q2=(ν2+μ), with the following initial conditions

    S(0)=ζ1,E(0)=ζ2,I(0)=ζ3,L(0)=ζ4,T(0)=ζ5.

    The Syphilis model with Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) derivative is given by

    CFDσtS=ΠλSμS,CFDσtE=λS+λωTQ0E,CFDσtI=ρ1EQ1I,CFDσtL=ρ2IQ2L,CFDσtT=ν1I+ν2LμTλωT (3.1)

    with σ being the fractional order 0<σ<1 subject to the following initial conditions

    S(0)=ζ1,E(0)=ζ2,I(0)=ζ3,L(0)=ζ4,T(0)=ζ5.

    Here, we give some of the mathematical preliminaries in the form of theorems, which we shall apply to prove the positivity and uniqueness and positivity of Syphilis model with Caputo-Fabrizio (3.1) as defined in [17,28] respectively. The definitions are stated as follows

    Definition 1. Assume ϕ(t)H1(1,2), for 2>1,τ[0,1]. The CF fractional operator is given as

    Dσt(ϕ(t))=M(σ)(1σ)21ϕ(θ)exp(σtθ1σ)dθ,0<σ<1,=dϕdt,σ=1, (3.2)

    where M(σ) satisfies the condition M(0)=M(1)=1.

    Definition 2. The integral operator of fractional order corresponding to the CF fractional derivative is stated as follows

    Ipt(ϕ(t))=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ(t)+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0ϕ(ζ)dζ,t0. (3.3)

    Definition 3. The Laplace transform of 0CFDσtϕ(t) is represented as follows

    L[0CFDσtϕ(t)]=M(σ)κL[ϕ(t)]ϕ(0)κ+σ(1κ). (3.4)

    We prove the positivity of the system using the following theorem.

    Theorem 1. Given the initial conditions S(0)>0,E(0)0,I(0)0, T(0)0,Lb(0)0 for all t0, we show that the set ˉΩ={(S,E,I,T,L)R5+} attracts all positive solutions of the fractional order system (3.1)

    We use Lemma 1 to prove Theorem 1.

    Lemma 1. Suppose f(t)C[a,b] and cDσtf(t)C[a,b] for all 0<σ1, then we have f(t)+1τ(σ) cDσtf(ζ)(ta)σ, where aζt, for all t(a,b] [29].

    Following Lemma 1, we give obtain the following remark.

    Remark 1. Assume that K(x)C[a,b] and cDσtK(x)C[a,b] for 0<σ1. It follows from Lemma 1 that if cDσtK(x)0, for all x(a,b), then K(x) is non decreasing and if cDσth(x)0 for all x(a,b), then K(x) is non increasing.

    We now prove Theorem 1.

    Proof. Using Lemma 1 and Remark 1 we show that the Syphilis model with CF has exist and has a unique solutions. Here, we prove that ˉΩ is positively invariant for each hyperplane bonding, the positive orthnant of the vector field points in ˉΩ. Therefore, model system (3.1) becomes

    CFDσtS|S=0=Π>0,CFDσtE|E=0=β(I+γL)S+βω(I+γL)T0,CFDσtI|I=0=ρ1E0,CFDσtL|L=0=ρ2I0,CFDσtT|T=0=ν1I0. (3.5)

    Thus, Equation (3.1) is positively invariant and all its solutions are attracting and positive in ˉΩ for t0.

    This subsection is devoted to proving the existence and uniqueness of the solution for model (3.1) by applying the integral operator as defined in Losada and Nieto [28] which yields:

    S(t)=S(0)+0CFIσt{Πβ(I+γL)SμS},E(t)=E(0)+0CFIσt{β(I+γL)S+βω(I+γL)TQ0E},I(t)=I(0)+0CFIσt{ρ1EQ1I},T(t)=T(0)+0CFIσt{ρ2IQ2L},L(t)=L(0)+0CFIσt{ν1I+ν2LμTβω(I+γL)T}. (3.6)

    Using the same notation as in [28], Eq (3.6) becomes

    S(t)=S(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ){Πβ(I(t)+γL(t))S(t)μS(t)}+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0{Πβ(I(ζ)+γL(ζ))S(ζ)μS(ζ)}dζE(t)=E(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ){β(I(t)+γL(t))S(t)+βω(I(t)+γL(t))T(t)Q0E(t)}+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0{β(I(ζ)+γL(ζ))S(ζ)+βω(I(ζ)+γL(ζ))T(ζ)Q0E(ζ)}dζI(t)=I(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ){ρ1E(t)Q1I(t)}+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0{ρ1E(ζ)Q1I(ζ)}dζ,T(t)=T(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ){ρ2I(t)Q2L(t)}+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0{ρ2I(ζ)Q2L(ζ)}dζ,L(t)=L(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ){ν1I(t)+ν2L(t)μT(t)βω(I(t)+γL)T(t)}+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0{ν1I(ζ)+ν2L(ζ)μT(ζ)βω(I(ζ)+γL(ζ))T(ζ)}dζ. (3.7)

    Without loss of generality and for simplification of notations, we shall denote

    Ψ1(t,S)=Πβ(I+γL)SμS,Ψ2(t,E)=β(I+γL)S+βω(I+γL)TQ0E,Ψ3(t,I)=ρ1EQ1I,Ψ4(t,T)=ρ2IQ2L,Ψ5(t,L)=ν1I+ν2LμTβω(I+γL)T, (3.8)

    Theorem 2. Each kernel (Ψ1,Ψ2,Ψ3,Ψ4,Ψ5,Ψ6,Ψ7) satisfy the Lipschitz condition and contraction if and only if the following inequality holds.

    0(β(I+γL)+μ)<1

    Proof. Considering the function S and S1 we have that

    ||Ψ1(t,S)Ψ1(t,S1)||=||(SS1)(β(I+γL))(SS1)μ||,pβ(I+γL)||SbSb1||+μ||SS1||(β(I+γL)+μ)||SS1||(β(χ3+γχ4)+μ)||SS1||d1||SS1||,

    where d1=pβbc3+μb,||S(t)||c1,||E(t)||c2,||I(t)||c3,||L(t)||c4 and ||T(t)||c5 are all bounded functions. Hence, ||Ψ1(t,S)Ψ1(t,S1)||d1||SS1||. Thus, Ψ1 satisfies the Lipschitz condition if 0(β(I+γL)μ)<1, and is also a contraction.

    Using a similar approach, we can show that (Ψ2(t,E),Ψ3(t,I),Ψ4(t,T),Ψ5(t,L)) satisfy the Lipschitz conditions.

    ||Ψ2(t,E)Ψ2(t,E1)||=d2||E(t)E1(t)||,||Ψ3(t,I)Ψ3(t,I1)||=d3||I(t)I1(t)||,||Ψ4(t,L)Ψ4(t,L1)||=d2||L(t)L1(t)||,||Ψ5(t,T)Ψ5(t,T1)||=d5||T(t)T1(t)||,

    where d2=Q0χ2,d3=Q1χ3,d4=Q2χ4 and d5=μχ5βω(χ3+γχ4)χ5. We reduce (3.8) using the same notation as in Eq (3.3) and obtain:

    S(t)=S(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ1(t,S)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ1(ζ,S)dζ,E(t)=E(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ2(t,E)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ2(ζ,E)dζ,I(t)=I(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ3(t,I)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ3(ζ,I)dζ,L(t)=L(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ4(t,L)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ4(ζ,L)dζ,T(t)=T(0)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ5(t,T)+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ5(ζ,T)dζ, (3.9)

    Suppose we define the iterative recursive forms below

    Sk(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ1(t,S(k1))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ1(ζ,S(k1))dζ,Ek(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ2(t,E(k1))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ2(ζ,E(k1))dζ,Ik(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ3(t,I(k1))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ3(ζ,I(k1))dζ,Lk(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ4(t,L(k1))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ4(ζ,L(k1))dζ,Tk(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)Ψ5(t,T(k1))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0Ψ5(ζ,T(k1))dζ, (3.10)

    with the initial conditions S(0)=ζ1,E(0)=ζ2,I(0)=ζ3,L(0)=ζ4,T(0)=ζ5.

    Next, we find the difference between the each successive and obtain the following result:

    λ1k(t)=Sk(t)S(k1)(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)(Ψ1(t,S(k1))Ψ1(t,S(k2)))+2p(2p)M(p)t0(Ψ1(ζ,S(k1))Φ1(ζ,S(k2)))dζ,λ2k(t)=Ek(t)E(k1)(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)(Φ2(t,E(k1))Ψ2(t,E(k2)))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0(Φ2(ζ,E(k1))Φ2(ζ,E(k2)))dζ,λ3k(t)=Ik(t)I(k1)(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)(Φ3(t,I(k1))Ψ3(t,I(k2)))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0(Φ3(ζ,I(k1))Φ3(ζ,Ik(k2)))dζ,λ4k(t)=Lk(t)L(k1)(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)(Ψ4(t,L(k1))Ψ4(t,L(k2)))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0(Φ4(ζ,T(k1))Ψ2(ζ,L(k2)))dζ,λ5k(t)=Tk(t)T(k1)(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)(Φ5(t,Vb(n1))Ψ5(t,T(k2)))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0(Ψ5(ζ,T(k1))Φ5(ζ,T(k2)))dζ, (3.11)

    in which

    Sk(t)=kj=1λ1j(t),Ek(t)=kj=1λ2j(t),Ik(t)=kj=1λ3j(t),Lk(t)=kj=1λ4j(t),Tk(t)=kj=1λ5j(t).

    We thus have the following results

    ||λ1k(t)||=||Sk(t)S(k1)(t)||=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)(Ψ1(t,S(k1))Ψ1(t,S(k2)))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0(Ψ1(ζ,Sb(n1))Ψ1(ζ,S(k2)))dζ,2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)(Ψ1(t,S(k1))Ψ1(t,S(k2)))+2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)t0(Ψ1(ζ,S(k1))Ψ1(ζ,S(k2)))dζ,2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1||S(k1)S(k2)||+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d1t0S(k1)S(k2)dζ,2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1||λ1(k1(t)||+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d1t0Tλ1(k1(t)dζ. (3.12)

    Using a similar approach, we can show that

    ||λ2k(t)||2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d2||λ2(k1)||+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d2t0λ2(k1)dζ,||λ3k(t)||2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d3||λ3(k1)||+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d3t0λ3(k1)dζ,||λ4k(t)||2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d4||λ4(k1)||+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d4t0λ4(k1)dζ,||λ5k(t)||2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d5||λ5(k1)||+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d5t0λ5(k1)dζ, (3.13)

    Theorem 3. The Syphilis Caputo-Fabrizio model (3.1) has a unique solution if

    (2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d12σ(2σ)M(σ)d1τ0)>0. (3.14)

    Let Eqs (3.12) and (3.13) bounded functions, we verify that the kernels (Ψ1,Ψ2,Ψ3,Ψ4,Ψ5) holds Lipschitz conditions and applying the recursive method and Theorem 3, we obtain

    ||λ1k(t)||||Sk(0)||(2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d1t)k,||λ2k(t)||||Ek(0)||(2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d1t)k,||λ2k(t)||||Ik(0)||(2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d1t)k,||λ4k(t)||||Lk(0)||(2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d1t)k,||λ5k(t)||||Tk(0)||(2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d1t)k.

    Therefore, we have that Eq (3.14) exists and is a smooth function, continuous and true for any value of k. Further, suppose the fractional model has solutions denoted by S(t),E(t),I(t),L(t) and L(t). we show that there exists a solution of the Syphilis CF fractional model (3.1) as follows:

    S(t)S(t)=2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)(Ψ1(t,S)Ψ1(t,S))+2σ(2σ)M(σ)t0(Ψ1(ζ,S)Ψ1(ζ,S))dζ

    and

    ||S(t)S(t)||2(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1||Sb(t)S(t)||+2σ(2σ)M(σ)d1||S(t)S(t)||dζ=||S(t)S(t)||(12(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d12(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d1t)0. (3.15)

    Theorem 4. The model (3.1) has a unique solution if

    (12(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)dj2σ(2σ)M(σ)djτ0)>0. (3.16)

    Using results from (3.15), we have that

    ||Sb(t)S(t)||(12(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d12σ(2σ)M(σ)d1t)0

    and also from (3.16) we obtain

    (12(1σ)(2σ)M(σ)d12σ(2σ)M(σ)d1τ0)>0.

    Therefore, ||S(t)S(t)||=0, which implies that S(t)=S(t). Similarly, we can also establish that E(t)=E(t),I(t)=I(t),L(t)=L(t),T(t)=T(t).

    In this subsection, we present the steady states of model (3.1) as well as their stabilities. Model (3.1) has a disease-free equilibrium (DFE) denoted by ε0 whenever E=I=I=L=L=0, which gives

    ε0=(S0,E0,I0,L0,T0)=(Πμ,0,0,0,0).

    The endemic equilibrium state denoted by ε1 is given by

    ε1=(S,E,I,L,T),

    where

    S=Πμ+ψ4I,E=ψ1I,I=ψ5ψ6L=ψ2I,T=ψ3Iμ+ψ4I,

    and ψ1=Q2ρ1, ψ2=ρ2ψ3, ψ3=ν1+ν2Q2, ψ4=ωβ(1+γ2ψ2), ψ5=μQ0Q1Πψ4, ψ6=ψ3ψ4ωQ0ψ1ψ4.

    Note that ε1 exists if and only if ψ50 and ψ6>0.

    Next, we determine the basic reproduction number denoted by RS. The parameter RS in this model is defined as the average number of new infections generated by an infectious individual in an early or late stage of the disease through direct contact with a Syphilis sore in a purely susceptible population. We use the method in [30] to find RS as follows. Given the Jacobian matrices

    F=[0βΠμβγΠμ000000]andV=[Q000ρ1Q100ρ2Q2]

    of the new infections and transfer matrices of the CF model (3.1) (where F and V are evaluated at the DFE respectively),

    RS=ρ(FV1)=βρ1Π(Q2+γρ2)μQ0Q1Q2

    where FV1 is the spectral radius of the next generation matrix, that is FV1.

    Theorem 5. Let d1,d2H such that gcd(d1,d2)=1 and q=d1d2. If M=d2, then, the DFE of the system (3.1) is locally asymptotically stable (LAS) if |arg(α)|>2πM for all roots of α of the characteristics equation (4.1) of the matrix Jε0,

    det(diag[αd1αd1αd1αd1])Jε0=0. (4.1)

    Proof. The Jacobian matrix of the system (3.1) evaluated at the DFE is given by

    J(ε0)=[μ0βΠμβΠμ00Q0βΠμβγΠμ000ρ2Q2000ν2ν2μ].

    the characteristics equation associated with J(ε0) is

    (αd1+μ)(αd1+μ)(c3α3d1+c2α2d1+c1αd1+c0)=0. (4.2)

    where c0=μQ0Q1Q2(RS1),c1=Πβρ1μ(Q0Q1+Q0Q2+Q1Q2),c2=μ(Q0+Q1+Q2) and c3=μ. The arguments of the roots of the equation (λd1+μ)=0, (λd1+μ)=0 are

    arg(ϕk)=πd1+2πkd1>πM>πM

    where k=0,1,,(p1). Thus, the first two roots of (4.2) are μ,μ and the others are calculated from

    P(α)=c3α3d1+c2α2d1+c1αd1+c0.

    The coefficients of c3 and c2 are clearly negative when RS<1, c0 is negative and c1 is also negative because

    Πβρ1<μQ0Q1Q2Q2+γρ2μ(Q0Q1+Q0Q2+Q1Q2).

    Therefore, when RS<1, there is no sign change in the coefficients of P(α). Thus, by Descartes's rules of signs, all the roots of P(α) are either negative or have negative real parts. Hence, the necessary condition for the root of the characteristics equation |arg(λ)|>2πM is fulfilled. The DFE is thus, LAS for RS<1.

    Theorem 6. The DFE is globally stable for RS<1 and unstable otherwise.

    Proof. We use the C1 Lyapnouv function

    L(t)=E(t)+v1I(t)+v2L(t)

    which is made up of the compartments that directly contribute to disease transmission and v1 and v2 are positive constants. The CF derivative of L(t) is

    CFDσtL(t)=CFDσtE(t)+vCF1DσtI(t)+vCF2DσtL(t),=β(I+γL)S+βω(I+γL)TQ0E+v1(ρ1EQ1I)+v2(ρ2IQ2L) =(v1ρ1Q0)E+(βS+ωβT+v2ρ2v1Q1)I+(βγS+ωβγTv2Q2)L.

    At DFE, S=Πμ,T=0. Therefore, L(t) satisfies the inequality

    CFDσtL(t)(v1ρ1Q0)E+(βΠμ+v2ρ2v1Q1)I+(βγΠμv2Q2)L. (4.3)

    Equating the coefficients of I and L to zero, we obtain the values of v1 and v2 as follows

    v1=βΠ(Q2+γρ2)μQ1Q2andv2=βΠγμQ2

    Substituting the constants v1 and v2 into the inequality (4.3), we have that Q0(RS1)E0. Whenever RS1, CFDσtL(t) is negative with equality when RS=1. Thus, by LaSalle's invariant principle [31] the DFE is globally stable in the invariant region and unstable otherwise.

    In this subsection, we derive the numerical scheme of the CF model using the method of two-step fractional Adams-Bashforth technique for the CF fractional derivative as in [32,33]. We re-write the Eq (3.1) as follows

    CFDσtS(t)=F1(t,S,E,I,L,T),CFDσtE(t)=F2(t,S,E,I,L,T),CFDσtI(t)=F3(t,S,E,I,L,T),CFDσtL(t)=F4(t,S,E,I,L,T),CFDσt=F5(t,S,E,I,L,T). (4.4)

    Using the fundamental theorem of fractional calculus, the first equation of system (4.4) is converted to

    S(t)S(0)=1σM(σ)F1(t,S)+σM(σ)t0F1(ξ,S)dξ (4.5)

    For t=tn+1,n=0,1,2,, we have S(tn+1) we obtain

    S(t)S(0)=1σM(σ)F1(t,Sn)+σM(σ)tn+10F1(t,S)dt (4.6)

    The successive terms is then given below:

    Sn+1S(0)=1σM(σ){F1(tn,Sn)F1(tn1,Sn1)}+σM(σ)tn+10F1(t,S)dt (4.7)

    For a closed interval [tk,t(k+1)], the function F1(t,S) can be interpolated by the interpolation polynomial

    Pk(t)f(tk,yk)h(ttk1)f(tk1,yk1)h(ttk) (4.8)

    for h=tntn1. Calculating the integral in (4.7) by using equation (4.8), we have that

    tn+1tnF1(t,S)dt=tn+1tnf(tn,Sn)h(ttn1)f(tn1,Sn1)h(ttn)dt=3h2F1(tn,Sn)h2F1(tn1,Sn1). (4.9)

    Together with (4.7) and (4.9) and after some algebraic simplification we get

    Sn+1=Sn+(1σM(σ)+3h2M(σ))F1(tn,Sn)(1σM(σ)+σh2M(σ))F1(tn1,Sn1). (4.10)

    Similarly, the recursive formula for the rest equations of system (3.1) is given as follows

    En+1=En+(1σM(σ)+3h2M(σ))F2(tn,En)(1σM(σ)+σh2M(σ))F2(tn1,En1)In+1=In+(1σM(σ)+3h2M(σ))F3(tn,In)(1σM(σ)+σh2M(σ))F3(tn1,In1)Ln+1=Ln+(1σM(σ)+3h2M(σ))F4(tn,Ln)(1σM(σ)+σh2M(σ))F4(tn1,Ln1)Tn+1=Tn+(1σM(σ)+3h2M(σ))F5(tn,Tn)(1σM(σ)+σh2M(σ))F5(tn1,Tn1). (4.11)

    Applying the definitions of ABC as in [34] to model (2.1), we have the following system of equations

    ABC0DqtS(t)=ΠλS(t)μS(t),ABC0DqtE(t)=λS(t)+ωλT(t)Q0E(t),ABC0DqtI(t)=ρ1E(t)Q1I(t),ABC0DqtL(t)=ρ2I(t)Q2L(t),ABC0DqtT(t)=ν1I(t)+ν2L(t)μT(t)ωλT(t) (5.1)

    where q is the fractional order, subject to initial conditions

    S(0)=ζ1,E(0)=ζ2,I(0)=ζ3,L(0)=ζ4,T(0)=ζ5.

    Here, we use the fixed point theory to show the existence and uniqueness of the solutions of the system (5.1). Consider the ABC system (5.1) re-written in the form below

    {ABC0DqtU(t):=Q(t,U(t))U(0):=U00<t<T< (5.2)

    where U(t)=(S,E,I,L,T) and Q is therefore a continuous vector function given as

    Q=[Q1(X)Q2(X)Q3(X)Q4(X)Q5(X)]=[ΠλS(t)μS(t)λS(t)+ωλT(t)Q0E(t)ρ1E(t)Q1I(t),ρ2I(t)Q2L(t),π0αihμ0manu1I(t)+ν2L(t)μT(t)ωλT(t)]. (5.3)

    and U0(t)=(S(0),E(0),I(0),L(0),T(0)) represents the initial conditions of the state variables respectively. The function Q satisfies the condition for the Lipschitz continuity and can be described as

    ||Q(t,U1(t))Q(t,U2(t))||M||U1(t)U2(t)||. (5.4)

    We give the following result, to show the existence and uniqueness of model (5.1).

    Theorem 7. Existence and uniqueness

    The ABC model given by (5.1) has a unique solution if the following condition is satisfied

    1qB(q)+qB(q)r(q)Tqmax<1.

    Proof. Applying the AB-fractional integral on the system (5.2), we obtain the following non-linear Voltera integral equation:

    U(t)=U0+1qB(q)Q(t,U(t))+qB(q)r(q)t0(tz)Q(z,U(z))dz (5.5)

    We assume that J=(0,T) and consider the operator φ:C(J,R5)C(J,R5), defined by

    φ(U(t))=U0+1qB(q)Q(t,U(t))+qB(q)r(q)t0(tz)q1Q(z,U(z))dz. (5.6)

    Equation (5.5) becomes

    U(t)=φ[U(t)]. (5.7)

    The supremum of J, ||.||J is

    ||U(t)||J=suptJ||U(t)||,U(t)C

    where C(J,R5) along the norm ||.||J represents a Banach space. Also,

    t0D(tz)U(z)dzT||D(t,z)||J||U(t)||J (5.8)

    with U(t)C(J,R5),D(t,z)C(J2,R5) such that

    ||D(t,z)||J=supt,zJ||D(t,z)||.

    Applying the definition of φ as stated in (5.7), we have

    [φ(t,U1(t))φ(t,U2(t))]J1qB(q)Q(t,U1(t))Q(t,U2(t))+αB(α)Γ(α)t0(tz)q1[Q(z,U1,z)Q(z,U2,z)]dz.

    Using the Lipschitz condition stated in (5.4) coupled with the result obtained in (5.8) and the principle of triangular inequality, we get the following after some algebraic manipulations

    ||φ(U1(t))φ(U2(t))||J[1qB(q)Q(t,U1(t))M+qB(α)r(q)MTqmax]t0(tz)q1U1(t)U2(t)J.

    We thus have

    ||φ(U1(t))φ(U2(t))||JBU1(t)U2(t)J,

    where

    B=1qB(q)M+qB(α)r(q)MTqmax.

    Therefore, the operator φ will become a contraction if the condition (5.4) holds on C(J,R5). By the Banach fixed point theorem, the system (5.3) has a unique solution.

    In this subsection, we derive the numerical scheme of the syphilis model in (5.1) using the Adams-Bashforth method [35]. Consider the system (5.2) written as follows

    ABC0DqtS(t)=H1(t,S,E,I,L,T),ABC0DqtE(t)=H2(t,S,E,I,L,T),ABC0DqtI(t)=H3(t,S,E,I,L,T),ABC0DqtL(t)=H4(t,S,E,I,L,T),ABC0DqtT(t)=H5(t,S,E,I,L,T). (5.9)

    Using the fundamental theorem of fractional calculus, the system (5.9) is converted to the following

    S(tn+1)=S(0)+1qABC(q)H1(tn,S)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0tj+1tj(tn+1z)q1H1(z,S)dzE(tn+1)=E(0)+1qABC(q)H2(tn,E)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0tj+1tj(tn+1z)q1H2(z,E)dz,I(tn+1)=I(0)+1qABC(q)H3(tn,I)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0tj+1tj(tn+1z)q1H3(z,I)dz,L(tn+1)=L(0)+1qABC(q)H4(tn,L)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0tj+1tj(tn+1z)q1H4(z,L)dz,T(tn+1)=T(0)+1qABC(q)H5(tn,T)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0tj+1tj(tn+1z)q1H5(z,T)dz. (5.10)

    Note that the integrals in (5.10) are approximated through the two-point interpolation polynomial. Hence we have the iterative scheme for the Syphilis model (5.1). After some algebraic calculations, we obtain an approximate solution for the ABC Syphilis model as follows

    S(tn+1)=S(0)+1qABC(q)H1(tn,S)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0[hqH1(tj,S)Γ(q+2)(n+1j)q(nj+2+q)(nj)q(nj+2+2q)hqH1(tj,S)Γ(q+2)((n+1j)q+1(nj)q(nj+1+q))],E(tn+1)=E(0)+1qABC(q)H2(tn,E)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0[hqH1(tj,E)Γ(q+2)(n+1j)q(nj+2+q)(nj)q(nj+2+2q)hqH1(tj,E)Γ(q+2)((n+1j)q+1(nj)q(nj+1+q))],I(tn+1)=I(0)+1qABC(q)H3(tn,I)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0[hqH1(tj,I)Γ(q+2)(n+1j)q(nj+2+q)(nj)q(nj+2+2q)hqH1(tj,I)Γ(q+2)((n+1j)q+1(nj)q(nj+1+q))],L(tn+1)=L(0)+1qABC(q)H4(tn,L)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0[hqH1(tj,L)Γ(q+2)(n+1j)q(nj+2+q)(nj)q(nj+2+2q)hqH1(tj,L)Γ(q+2)((n+1j)q+1(nj)q(nj+1+q))],T(tn+1)=T(0)+1qABC(q)H5(tn,T)+qABC(q)Γ(q)ntj=0[hqH1(tj,T)Γ(q+2)(n+1j)q(nj+2+q)(nj)q(nj+2+2q)hqH1(tj,T)Γ(q+2)((n+1j)q+1(nj)q(nj+1+q))]. (5.11)

    Next, we use the numerical scheme to simulate the results of the ABC Syphilis model.

    In this section, we explored the numerical dynamics of Syphilis model (3.1) in the context of Caputo-Fabrizio. In this work, the following parameter values and initial conditions were used Π=0.03,μ=0.0000559,β=0.3,γ=0.45,ρ1=0.03,ρ2=0.02,ν1=0.5,ν2=0.5,ω=0.0093, with units per day and the initial conditions S(0)=14,E(0)=2,I(0)=0,L(0)=0 and T(0)=4 for our numerical simulations. The parameter values Π,μ, and ω refer to [5], while parameters β,γ,ρ1,ρ2,ν1, and ν2 refer to [14].

    Figure 2(a) is the susceptible individuals (S) for integer and non-integer. The number of susceptible humans reduces as the fractional order σ derivatives increases from 0.3 within 120 days. Figure 2(b) is the exposed humans (E) in which both integer and non-integer order derivatives presented. As the fractional-order derivative increases from 0.3, the number of exposed humans increased. This is naturally expected as more humans are exposed to the disease. Figure 2(c), the number of infected individuals at early stage (I) increase as the fractional order derivatives increases from 0.3 to 0.9. This is naturally the case as more humans move into infected humans compartment. Figure 2(d) is the individuals at late-stage infection with syphilis and as the fractions, order derivatives increase from 0.3 to 1, the individuals increase towards the non-integer. In Figure 2(e), the number of individuals treated reduces as the fractional order derivatives increase. In effect, to increase the number of individuals treated, the fractional-order would be reduced to 0.3.

    Figure 2.  Simulations for Syphilis model (3.1) via Exponential-law at σ=1,0.9,0.8, 0.5,0.3..

    Figure 3 was obtained by solving system equation (5.1) with Mittag-Leffler function using the numerical scheme of Eq (5.11). The same parameter values and associated initial conditions were used for this work simulations. Figure 3(a) is the susceptible individuals (S) and as fractional order derivative increases, the number of susceptible reduces. Figure 3(b) depicts the exposed individuals (E) in which the number of exposed individuals (E) increases as the non-integers turn into integer-order 1. Figure 3(c) shows that the early infected individuals (I) with syphilis increases as the non-integer fractional-order derivatives 0.3 increases toward the integer order 1. Figure 3(d) displays the late individuals infected with syphilis (L) in the community increasing as fractional-order derivatives increase from 0.3 upward towards integer order 1. Figure 3(e) is the treated individuals (T) where the non-integer order derivatives increase from 0.3 towards 1, the number of individuals under treatment reduces.

    Figure 3.  Simulations for Syphilis model (5.1) via Mittag-Leffler function at q=1,0.9,0.8, 0.5,0.3..

    In this study, a syphilis mathematical model with Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) and Mittag-Leffler function was formulated and analyzed. The basic properties of the model were examined and the steady states of the model were investigated. The stability analysis of the disease-free state for CF model was carried out and found to be stable from both local and global perspectives. The disease-free state of the CF model is locally as well as globally asymptotically stable when the basic reproduction number is less than unity. In each operator used for the study, the existence and uniqueness of solutions were established. Respective numerical schemes for each operator were carried to obtain numerical simulation to support the analytical solution. It was established that the fractional-order derivatives influence the dynamics of the Syphilis disease in the community. It is suggested other complex models can be investigated using fractional derivatives operators.

    Authors would like to thank you their respective universities for the production of this manuscript.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Z. Q. Chen, G. C. Zhang, X. D. Gong, C. Lin, X. Gao, G. J. Liang, Syphilis in China: results of a national surveillance programme, The Lancet, 369 (2007), 132–138. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60074-9
    [2] L. Doherty, K. A. Fenton, J. Jones, T. C. Paine, S. P. Higgins, D. Williams, et al. Syphilis: old problem, new strategy, BMJ, 325 (2002), 153–156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7356.153
    [3] CDC, Sexually transmitted diseases. Centers for disease control and prevention, 20 January 2010. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/stdfact-syphilis-detailed.htm: :text=Syphilis%20is%20transmitted%20from%20person,%2C%20anal%2C%20or%20oral%20sex.
    [4] D. Aadland, D. C. Finnoff, K. X. Huang, Syphilis cycles, BE J. Economic Anal. Policy, 14 (2013), 297–348.
    [5] G. P. Garnett, S. O. Aral, D. V. Hoyle, W. Cates, R. M. Anderson, The natural history of syphilis: Implications for the transmission dynamics and control of infection, Sex. Transm. Dis., 24 (1997), 185–200. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199704000-00002
    [6] M. Myint, H. Bashiri, R. D. Harrington, C. M. Marra, Relapse of secondary syphilis after benzathine penicillin G: molecular analysis, Sex. Trans. Dis., 31 (2004), 196–199. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000114941.37942.4C
    [7] N. R. Birnbaum, R. H. Goldschmidt, W. Buffet, Resolving the common clinical dilemmas of syphilis, Am. Fam. Physician, 59 (1999), 2233.
    [8] M. L. Juga, F. Nyabadza, Modelling the Ebola virus disease dynamics in the presence of interfered interventions, Commun. Math. Biol. Neurosci., 2020 (2020), 1–30.
    [9] C. W. Chukwu, J. Mushanyu, M. L. Juga, Fatmawati, A mathematical model for co-dynamics of Listeriosis and bacterial meningitis diseases, Commun. Math. Biol. Neurosci., 2020 (2020), 1–20.
    [10] E. Bonyah, M. Juga, W. Chukwu, Fatmawati, A fractional order dengue fever model in the context of protected travellers, Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.09.21249522v1, 2021.
    [11] C. W. Chukwu, F. Nyabadza, A mathematical model and optimal control for Listeriosis disease from ready-to-eat food products, Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.11.20210856v1, 2020.
    [12] C. W. Chukwu, F. Nyabadza, A theoretical model of Listeriosis driven by cross contamination of ready-to-eat food products, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 2020, (2020).
    [13] Fatmawati, D. U. Purwati, F. Riyudha, H. Tasman, Optimal control of a discrete age-structured model for tuberculosis transmission, Heliyon, 6 (2020), e03030. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03030
    [14] B. Pourbohloul, M. L. Rekart, R. C. Brunham, Impact of mass treatment on syphilis transmission: A mathematical modeling approach, J. Sex. Transm. Dis., 30 (2003), 297–305. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200304000-00005
    [15] F. Milner, R. Zhao, A new mathematical model of syphilis, J. Sex. Transm. Dis., 5 (2010), 96-–108.
    [16] E. Iboi, D. Okuonghae, Population dynamics of a mathematical model for syphilis, Appl. Math. Model., 40 (2016), 3573–3590. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.09.090
    [17] M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Diff. Appl., 1 (2015), 1–13.
    [18] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016).
    [19] A. Atangana, I. Koca, Chaos in a simple nonlinear system with Atangana–Baleanu derivatives with fractional order, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 89 (2016), 447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.02.012
    [20] M. A. Khan, S. Ullah, M. Farooq, A new fractional model for tuberculosis with relapse via Atangana–Baleanu derivative, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 116 (2018), 227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.039
    [21] E. Bonyah, Chaos in a 5-D hyperchaotic system with four wings in the light of non-local and non-singular fractional derivatives, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 116 (2018), 316–331. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.034
    [22] A. Akgül, A novel method for a fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 114 (2018), 478–482. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.07.032
    [23] A. Akgül, Analysis and new applications of fractal fractional differential equations with power law kernel, Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 116 (2020). Available from: doi:10.3934/dcdss.2020423.
    [24] A. Akgül, E. K. Akgül, A novel method for solutions of fourth-order fractional boundary value problems, Fract. Fraction., 3 (2019), 1–13. doi: 10.3390/fractalfract3010001
    [25] E. K. Akgül, A. Akgül, D. Baleanu, Laplace transform method for economic models with constant proportional Caputo derivative, Fractal Fractional, 4 (2020), 1–10.
    [26] A. Akgül, D. Baleanu, Analysis and applications of the proportional Caputo derivative, Adv. Differ. Eq., 2021 (2021), 136. doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03304-0
    [27] Fatmawati, M. A. Khan, E. Bonyah, Z. Hammouch, E. M. Shaiful, A mathematical model of tuberculosis (TB) transmission with children and adults groups: A fractional model, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2020), 2813–2842. doi: 10.3934/math.2020181
    [28] J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Diff. Appl., 1 (2015), 87–92.
    [29] Z. M. Odibat, N. T. Shawagfeh, Generalized Taylor's formula, Appl. Math. Comput., 186 (2007), 286–293.
    [30] P. van den Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6
    [31] J. La Salle, S. Lefschetz, R. Alverson, Stability by Liapunov's direct method with applications, Phys. Today, 15 (1962), 59.
    [32] A. Atangana, K. M. Owolabi, New numerical approach for fractional differential equations, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 13 (2018), 3. doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2018010
    [33] S. Ullah, M. A. Khan, M. Farooq, Z. Hammouch, D. Baleanu, A fractional model for the dynamics of tuberculosis infection using Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 13 (2020), 975.
    [34] A. Atangana, E. Bonyah, A. Elsadany, A fractional order optimal 4D chaotic financial model with Mittag-Leffler law, Chinese J. Phys., 65 (2020), 38–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2020.02.003
    [35] M. Toufik, A. Atangana, New numerical approximation of fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel: Application to chaotic models, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 132 (2017), 444. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11717-0
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Shahram Rezapour, Sina Etemad, Ravi P. Agarwal, Kamsing Nonlaopon, On a Lyapunov-Type Inequality for Control of a ψ-Model Thermostat and the Existence of Its Solutions, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 4023, 10.3390/math10214023
    2. Muhammad Samraiz, Maria Malik, Kanwal Saeed, Saima Naheed, Sina Etemad, Manuel De la Sen, Shahram Rezapour, A Study on the Modified Form of Riemann-Type Fractional Inequalities via Convex Functions and Related Applications, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2682, 10.3390/sym14122682
    3. Zoubida Bouazza, Sabit Souhila, Sina Etemad, Mohammed Said Souid, Ali Akgül, Shahram Rezapour, Manuel De la Sen, On the Caputo-Hadamard fractional IVP with variable order using the upper-lower solutions technique, 2022, 8, 2473-6988, 5484, 10.3934/math.2023276
    4. C. W. Chukwu, , Modelling fractional-order dynamics of COVID-19 with environmental transmission and vaccination: A case study of Indonesia, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 4416, 10.3934/math.2022246
    5. Muzammil Mukhtar, Muhammad Yaqoob, Muhammad Samraiz, Iram Shabbir, Sina Etemad, Manuel De la Sen, Shahram Rezapour, Novel Mean-Type Inequalities via Generalized Riemann-Type Fractional Integral for Composite Convex Functions: Some Special Examples, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 479, 10.3390/sym15020479
    6. Endang Yuliani, Cicik Alfiniyah, Maureen L. Juga, Chidozie W. Chukwu, On the Modeling of COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics with Two Strains: Insight through Caputo Fractional Derivative, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 346, 10.3390/fractalfract6070346
    7. Amar Benkerrouche, Sina Etemad, Mohammed Said Souid, Shahram Rezapour, Hijaz Ahmad, Thongchai Botmart, Fractional variable order differential equations with impulses: A study on the stability and existence properties, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 775, 10.3934/math.2023038
    8. Shewafera Wondimagegnhu Teklu, Birhanu Baye Terefe, COVID-19 and syphilis co-dynamic analysis using mathematical modeling approach, 2023, 8, 2297-4687, 10.3389/fams.2022.1101029
    9. E. Bonyah, M. L. Juga, L. M. Matsebula, C. W. Chukwu, On the Modeling of COVID-19 Spread via Fractional Derivative: A Stochastic Approach, 2023, 15, 2070-0482, 338, 10.1134/S2070048223020023
    10. Bahatdin Daşbaşı, Fractional order bacterial infection model with effects of anti-virulence drug and antibiotic, 2023, 170, 09600779, 113331, 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113331
    11. Hira Waheed, Akbar Zada, Ioan-Lucian Popa, Sina Etemad, Shahram Rezapour, On a System of Sequential Caputo-Type p-Laplacian Fractional BVPs with Stability Analysis, 2024, 23, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-00988-z
    12. C.W. Chukwu, E. Bonyah, M.L. Juga, , On mathematical modeling of fractional-order stochastic for tuberculosis transmission dynamics, 2023, 11, 26667207, 100238, 10.1016/j.rico.2023.100238
    13. Chidozie Williams Chukwu, Zviiteyi Chazuka, Salman Safdar, Iffatricia Haura Febriana, Dipo Aldila, Assessing Syphilis transmission among MSM population incorporating low and high-risk infection: a modeling study, 2024, 43, 2238-3603, 10.1007/s40314-024-02669-8
    14. Olumuyiwa James Peter, Nadhira Dwi Fahrani, C.W. Chukwu, A fractional derivative modeling study for measles infection with double dose vaccination, 2023, 4, 27724425, 100231, 10.1016/j.health.2023.100231
    15. Isaac Olopade, Saheed Ajao, Titilayo Akinwumi, Gbenga Adeniran, Raphael Aderenle, Adelani Adesanya, Mathematical modelling of the impacts of syphilis multi-stage treatments, 2024, 10, 2363-6203, 5489, 10.1007/s40808-024-02075-3
    16. Samuel Okyere, Joseph Ackora-Prah, Kwaku Forkuoh Darkwah, Francis Tabi Oduro, Ebenezer Bonyah, Arzu Akbulut, Fractional Optimal Control Model of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Disease in Ghana, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/3308529
    17. C.W. Chukwu, M.I. Utoyo, A. Setiawan, J.O. Akanni, Fractional model of HIV transmission on workplace productivity using real data from Indonesia, 2024, 225, 03784754, 1089, 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.11.014
    18. Samuel Okyere, Joseph Ackora-Prah, Ebenezer Bonyah, Bennedict Barnes, Maxwell Akwasi Boateng, Ishmael Takyi, Samuel Akwasi Adarkwa, Hypertension and COVID-19 fractional derivative model with double dose vaccination, 2023, 12, 2046-1402, 495, 10.12688/f1000research.133768.1
    19. Reny George, Sina Etemad, İbrahim Avcı, Fahad Sameer Alshammari, A Qualitative Study for Two Discrete Fractional Delta Difference BVPs with Falling Functions: Application on the Temperature Control System, 2025, 24, 1575-5460, 10.1007/s12346-024-01181-y
    20. Kamel Guedri, Rahat Zarin, Mowffaq Oreijah, Samaher Khalaf Alharbi, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa, Modeling syphilis progression and disability risk with neural networks, 2025, 314, 09507051, 113220, 10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113220
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3227) PDF downloads(142) Cited by(20)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog