Processing math: 41%
Research article

Decay rate for systems of m-nonlinear wave equations with new viscoelastic structures

  • The article discusses the effect of weak and strong damping terms on decay rate for systems of nonlinear m- wave equations with new viscoelastic structures. The factors that allowed system (1.1) to coexist for a long time are the strong nonlinearities in the sources. We showed, under a novel condition on the kernel function in (2.4), a new scenario for energy decay in (3.7) by using an appropriate energy estimates. This result extend the results in [18,27] for system of m-equations inspired from the paper [1].

    Citation: Mohamed Biomy. Decay rate for systems of m-nonlinear wave equations with new viscoelastic structures[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 5502-5517. doi: 10.3934/math.2021326

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ruifang Yang, Shilin Yang . Representations of a non-pointed Hopf algebra. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10523-10539. doi: 10.3934/math.2021611
    [2] Fengxia Gao, Jialei Chen . Conjugacy classes of left ideals of Sweedler's four-dimensional algebra H4. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7720-7727. doi: 10.3934/math.2022433
    [3] Haijun Cao, Fang Xiao . The category of affine algebraic regular monoids. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2666-2679. doi: 10.3934/math.2022150
    [4] Yaguo Guo, Shilin Yang . Projective class rings of a kind of category of Yetter-Drinfeld modules. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10997-11014. doi: 10.3934/math.2023557
    [5] Faiza Shujat, Faarie Alharbi, Abu Zaid Ansari . Weak (p,q)-Jordan centralizer and derivation on rings and algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8322-8330. doi: 10.3934/math.2025383
    [6] Mingze Zhao, Huilan Li . A pair of dual Hopf algebras on permutations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5106-5123. doi: 10.3934/math.2021302
    [7] Panpan Jia, Jizhu Nan, Yongsheng Ma . Separating invariants for certain representations of the elementary Abelian p-groups of rank two. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25603-25618. doi: 10.3934/math.20241250
    [8] Zehra Velioǧlu, Mukaddes Balçik . On the Tame automorphisms of differential polynomial algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3547-3555. doi: 10.3934/math.2020230
    [9] Qining Li . Double Ore extensions of anti-angle type for Hopf algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12566-12586. doi: 10.3934/math.2022696
    [10] Simone Costa, Marco Pavone . Orthogonal and oriented Fano planes, triangular embeddings of K7, and geometrical representations of the Frobenius group F21. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35274-35292. doi: 10.3934/math.20241676
  • The article discusses the effect of weak and strong damping terms on decay rate for systems of nonlinear m- wave equations with new viscoelastic structures. The factors that allowed system (1.1) to coexist for a long time are the strong nonlinearities in the sources. We showed, under a novel condition on the kernel function in (2.4), a new scenario for energy decay in (3.7) by using an appropriate energy estimates. This result extend the results in [18,27] for system of m-equations inspired from the paper [1].



    In [12,Definition 11.2] and [18,p. 134,Theorem A], the second kind Bell polynomials Bn,k for nk0 are defined by

    Bn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)=Nnk+10n!nk+1i=1i!nk+1i=1(xii!)i,

    where N0={0}N, the sum is taken over =(1,2,,nk+1) with iN0 satisfying nk+1i=1i=k and nk+1i=1ii=n. This kind of polynomials are very important in combinatorics, analysis, and the like. See the review and survey article [53] and closely related references therein.

    In [36,pp. 13–15], when studying Grothendieck's inequality and completely correlation-preserving functions, Oertel obtained the interesting identity

    2nk=1(1)k(2n+k)!k!B2n,k(0,16,0,340,0,5112,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]2(2nk+2)!)=(1)n

    for nN, where

    Bn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)=k!n!Bn,k(1!x1,2!x2,,(nk+1)!xnk+1). (1.1)

    In [36,p. 15], Oertel wrote that "However, already in this case we don't know a closed form expression for the numbers

    B2n,k(0,16,0,340,0,5112,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]2(2nk+2)!). (1.2)

    An even stronger problem appears in the complex case, since already a closed-form formula for the coefficients of the Taylor series of the inverse of the Haagerup function is still unknown''.

    By virtue of the relation (1.1), we see that, to find a closed-form formula for the sequence (1.2), it suffices to discover a closed-form formula for

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2). (1.3)

    In this paper, one of our aims is to derive closed-form formulas for the sequence (1.3). The first main result can be stated as the following theorem.

    Theorem 1.1. For k,n0, mN, and xmC, we have

    B2n+1,k(0,x2,0,x4,,1+(1)k2x2nk+2)=0. (1.4)

    For k,nN, we have

    B2n,2k1(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,0,[(2n2k+1)!!]22n2k+3)=22n(2k1)![kp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)k1p=1(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)]

    and

    B2n,2k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,[(2n2k1)!!]22n2k+1,0)=22n(2k)![kp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)kp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)],

    where s(n,k), which can be generated by

    xn=nm=0s(n,m)xm, (1.5)

    denote the first kind Stirling numbers and

    T(r;q,j;ρ)=(1)q[rm=q(ρ)ms(r,m)(mq)][rm=jq(ρ)ms(r,m)(mjq)]. (1.6)

    In Section 2, for proving Theorem 1.1, we will establish two general expressions for power series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 respectively.

    In Section 3, with the aid of general expressions for power series expansions of the functions (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 established in Section 2, we will prove Theorem 1.1 in details.

    In Section 4, basing on arguments in [20,p. 308] and [28,Section 2.4] and utilizing general expressions for power series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 established in Section 2, we will derive series representations of generalized logsine functions which were originally introduced in [34] and have been investigating actively, deeply, and systematically by mathematicians [9,10,14,15,16,17,29,30,31,37,38,57] and physicists [3,19,20,28].

    Finally, in Section 5, we will list several remarks on our main results and related stuffs.

    To prove Theorem 1.1, we need to establish the following general expressions of the power series expansions of (arcsinx) for N.

    Theorem 2.1. For N and |x|<1, the functions (arcsinx) can be expanded into power series

    (arcsinx)21=(4)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+2121) (2.1)

    or

    (arcsinx)2=(1)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+22), (2.2)

    where s(n,k) denotes the first kind Stirling numbers generated in (1.5) and T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6).

    Proof. In [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [7,p. 3], [20,p. 308], and [28,pp. 49–50], it was stated that the generating expression for the series expansion of (arcsinx)n with nN is

    exp(tarcsinx)==0b(t)x!,

    where b0(t)=1, b1(t)=t, and

    b2(t)=1k=0[t2+(2k)2],b2+1(t)=tk=1[t2+(2k1)2]

    for N. This means that, when writing

    b(t)=k=0β,ktk,0,

    where β0,0=1, β2,0=0, β2,2k+1=0, and β21,2k=0 for k0 and 1, we have

    =0(arcsinx)t!==0x!k=0β,ktk=k=0=kx!β,ktk==0[m=βm,xmm!]t.

    Equating coefficients of t gives

    (arcsinx)=!m=βm,xmm!=!n=0βn+,xn+(n+)!,N. (2.3)

    It is not difficult to see that

    b2(t)=41t2(1it2)1(1+it2)1andb2+1(t)=4t(12it2)(12+it2),

    where i=1 is the imaginary unit and

    (z)n=n1=0(z+)={z(z+1)(z+n1),n11,n=0

    is called the rising factorial of zC, while

    zn=n1=0(z)={z(z1)(zn+1),n11,n=0 (2.4)

    is called the falling factorial of zC. Making use of the relation

    (z)n=(1)nznorzn=(1)n(z)n

    in [52,p. 167], we acquire

    b2(t)=41t2it211it211andb2+1(t)=4tit212it212.

    Utilizing the relation (1.5) in [59,p. 19,(1.26)], we obtain

    b2(t)=41t21m=0s(1,m)2m(it2)m1m=0(1)ms(1,m)2m(it+2)m=41t21m=0s(1,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk(2)mk1m=0(1)ms(1,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk2mk=41t21m=0(1)ms(1,m)mk=0(1)k2k(mk)iktk1m=0(1)ms(1,m)mk=012k(mk)iktk=41t21k=0[1m=k(1)m+ks(1,m)2k(mk)]iktk1k=0[1m=k(1)ms(1,m)2k(mk)]iktk=41t22(1)k=0kq=0[1m=q(1)m+qs(1,m)2q(mq)1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)2kq(mkq)]iktk=41t22(1)k=012kkq=0[1m=q(1)m+qs(1,m)(mq)1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)(mkq)]iktk=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0(1m=q(1)ms(1,m)(mq))1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)(mkq)]tk+2=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0T(1;q,k;1)]tk+2

    and

    b2+1(t)=4tm=0s(,m)2m(it1)mm=0(1)ms(,m)2m(it+1)m=4tm=0s(,m)2mmk=0(1)mk(mk)iktkm=0(1)ms(,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk=4tk=0[m=k(1)ms(,m)2m(mk)](i)ktkk=0[m=k(1)ms(,m)2m(mk)]iktk=42k=0ik[kq=0(1)q(m=q(1)ms(,m)2m(mq))m=kq(1)ms(,m)2m(mkq)]tk+1=42k=0ik[kq=0T(;q,k;12)]tk+1.

    This means that

    2k=0β2,ktk=2(1)k=2β2,k+2tk+2=2(1)k=0β2,k+2tk+2=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0T(1;q,k;1)]tk+2

    and

    2+1k=0β2+1,ktk=2k=1β2+1,k+1tk+1=2k=0β2+1,k+1tk+1=42k=0ik[kq=0T(;q,k;12)]tk+1.

    Further equating coefficients of tk+2 and tk+1 respectively arrives at

    β2,k+2=41ik2kkq=0T(1;q,k;1)andβ2+1,k+1=4ikkq=0T(;q,k;12)

    for k0.

    Replacing by 21 for N in (2.3) leads to

    (arcsinx)21=(21)!n=0βn+21,21xn+21(n+21)!=(21)!n=0β2n+21,21x2n+21(2n+21)!=(21)!n=0[4n+1i2(1)2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+21)!=(1)141(21)!n=0[4n2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+21)!=(4)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+2121).

    Replacing by 2 for N in (2.3) leads to

    (arcsinx)2=(2)!n=0βn+2,2xn+2(n+2)!=(2)!n=0β2n+2,2x2n+2(2n+2)!=(1)1(2)!n=0[4n2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+2)!=(1)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+22).

    The proof of Theorem 2.1 is complete.

    We now start out to prove Theorem 1.1.

    In the last line of [18,p. 133], there exists the formula

    1k!(m=1xmtmm!)k=n=kBn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)tnn! (3.1)

    for k0. When taking x2m1=0 for mN, the left hand side of the formula (3.1) is even in t(,) for all k0. Therefore, the formula (1.4) is valid.

    Ones know that the power series expansion

    arcsint==0[(21)!!]2(2+1)!t2+1,|t|<1 (3.2)

    is valid, where (1)!!=1. This implies that

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2)=B2n,k((arcsint)|t=02,(arcsint)|t=03,(arcsint)(4)|t=04,,(arcsint)(2nk+2)|t=02nk+2).

    Employing the formula

    Bn,k(x22,x33,,xnk+2nk+2)=n!(n+k)!Bn+k,k(0,x2,x3,,xn+1)

    in [18,p. 136], we derive

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2)=(2n)!(2n+k)!B2n+k,k(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0).

    Making use of the formula (3.1) yields

    n=0Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)k!n!(n+k)!tn+kn!=(m=1xmtmm!)k,n=0Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)(n+kk)tn+kn!=(m=1xmtmm!)k,Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)=(n+kk)limt0dndtn[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k,B2n+k,k(x1,x2,,x2n+1)=(2n+kk)limt0d2ndt2n[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k.

    Setting x1=0 and xm=(arcsint)(m)|t=0 for m2 gives

    d2ndt2n[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k=d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]k=d2ndt2n(arcsinttt)k=d2ndt2nkp=0(1)kp(kp)(arcsintt)p=kp=1(1)kp(kp)d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p.

    Accordingly, we obtain

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k1=2k1p=1(1)2kp1(2k1p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p=kp=1(2k12p1)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1k1p=1(2k12p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k=2kp=1(1)2kp(2kp)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p=kp=1(2k2p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2pkp=1(2k2p1)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1.

    From the power series expansions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1, it follows that

    limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1=(1)p14p1(2p1)!×limt0d2ndt2nj=0[4j2p2q=0T(j+p1;q,2p2;12)]t2j(2j+2p1)!=(1)p14n+p1(2n+2p12n)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p=(1)p1(2p)!limt0d2ndt2nj=0[4j2p2q=0T(j+p1;q,2p2;1)]t2j(2j+2p)!=(1)p14n(2n+2p2n)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1).

    Therefore, we arrive at

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k1=4nkp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)4nk1p=1(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k=4nkp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)4nkp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12).

    Consequently, we acquire

    B2n,2k1(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,0,[(2n2k+1)!!]22n2k+3)=(2n)!(2n+2k1)!B2n+2k1,2k1(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0)=(2n)!(2n+2k1)!(2n+2k12k1)limt0d2ndt2n(1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!)2k1=1(2k1)![4nkp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)4nk1p=0(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)]

    and

    B2n,2k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,[(2n2k1)!!]22n2k+1,0)=(2n)!(2n+2k)!B2n+2k,2k(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0)=(2n)!(2n+2k)!(2n+2k2k)limt0d2ndt2n(1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!)2k=1(2k)![4nkp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)4nkp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)].

    The proof of Theorem 1.1 is complete.

    The logsine function

    Lsj(θ)=θ0(ln|2sinx2|)j1dx

    and generalized logsine function

    Ls()j(θ)=θ0x(ln|2sinx2|)j1dx

    were introduced originally in [34,pp. 191–192], where ,j are integers, j+11, and θ is an arbitrary real number. There have been many papers such as [3,9,10,14,15,16,17,19,20,28,29,30,31,37,38,57] devoted to investigation and applications of the (generalized) logsine functions in mathematics, physics, engineering, and other mathematical sciences.

    Theorem 4.1. Let zn for zC and n{0}N denote the falling factorial defined by (2.4) and let T(r;q,j;ρ) be defined by (1.6). In the region 0<θπ and for j,N, generalized logsine functions Ls()j(θ) have the following series representations:

    1. for j2+13,

    Ls(21)j(θ)=θ22[ln(2sinθ2)]j2(1)(j2)(21)!(ln2)j1(2sinθ2ln2)2×n=0(2sinθ2)2n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(lnsinθ2ln2)α(j21α)αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]; (4.1)

    2. for j2+24,

    Ls(2)j(θ)=θ2+12+1[ln(2sinθ2)]j21+(1)(j21)(2)!(ln2)j12(4sinθ2ln2)2+1×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×[j22α=0(j22α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2+1)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]; (4.2)

    3. for j211,

    Ls(22)j(θ)=(1)243(22)!(ln2)j(sinθ2ln2)21×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+21)k+1(lnsinθ2)k; (4.3)

    4. for j211,

    Ls(21)j(θ)=(1)(21)!(ln2)j(2sinθ2ln2)2×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k. (4.4)

    Proof. In [28,p. 49,Section 2.4], it was obtained that

    Ls(k)j(θ)=θk+1k+1[ln(2sinθ2)]jk1+2k+1(jk1)k+1sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)k+1lnjk2(2x)xdx (4.5)

    for 0<θπ and jk20. Making use of Theorem 2.1 and the formula

    xnlnmxdx=xn+1mk=0(1)kmklnmkx(n+1)k+1,m,n0 (4.6)

    in [22,p. 238,2.722], we acquire

    sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)2lnj21(2x)xdx=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]sin(θ/2)0x2n+21lnj21(2x)dx=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(ln2+lnx)j21dx]=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(j21α)(ln2)j2α1sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(lnx)αdx]=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(j21α)(ln2)j2α1(sinθ2)2n+2αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)αk]=(1)1(2)!(ln2)j21(sinθ2)2n=04n(2n+2)!(sinθ2)2n[22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(lnsinθ2ln2)α(j21α)αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]

    for j2+13. Substituting this result into (4.5) for k=21 yields (4.1).

    Similarly, by virtue of Theorem 2.1 and the formula (4.6), we also have

    sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)2+1lnj22(2x)xdx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]sin(θ/2)0x2n+2lnj22(2x)dx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×j22α=0(j22α)(ln2)j2α2sin(θ/2)0x2n+2(lnx)αdx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×j22α=0(j22α)(ln2)j2α2(sinθ2)2n+2+1αk=0(1)kαk(lnsinθ2)αk(2n+2+1)k+1=(1)4(2+1)!(sinθ2)2+1(ln2)j22n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!(sinθ2)2n2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×[j22α=0(j22α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2+1)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]

    for N and j2(+1)4. Substituting this result into (4.5) for k=2 yields (4.2).

    In [20,p. 308], it was derived that

    Ls(k)j(θ)=2k+1sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)k1x2lnjk1(2x)dx (4.7)

    for 0<θπ and jk+11. Differentiating with respect to x on both sides of the formulas (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1 results in

    (arcsinx)221x2=(1)141(22)!n=0[4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+22(2n+22)! (4.8)

    and

    (arcsinx)211x2=(1)1(21)!n=0[4n22q=0T(n+;q,2;1)]x2n+21(2n+21)! (4.9)

    for N. Substituting the power series expansions (4.8) and (4.9) into (4.7) and employing the indefinite integral (4.6) respectively reveal

    Ls(22)j(θ)=221sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)221x2lnj2+1(2x)dx=(1)243(22)!n=0[4n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×sin(θ/2)0x2n+22(ln2+lnx)j2+1dx=(1)243(22)!n=0[4n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(ln2)j2α+1sin(θ/2)0x2n+22(lnx)αdx=(1)243(22)!(ln2)j(sinθ2ln2)21n=0[4n(2n+22)!(sinθ2)2n×22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+21)k+1(lnsinθ2)k

    for j211 and

    Ls(21)j(θ)=22sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)211x2lnj2(2x)dx=(1)22(21)!n=0[4n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(ln2+lnx)j2dx=(1)22(21)!n=0[4n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(ln2)j2αsin(θ/2)0x2n+21(lnx)αdx=(1)(21)!(ln2)j(2sinθ2ln2)2n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k

    for j21. The series representations (4.3) and (4.4) are thus proved. The proof of Theorem 4.1 is complete.

    Finally, we list several remarks on our main results and related stuffs.

    Remark 5.1. For nk1, the first kind Stirling numbers s(n,k) can be explicitly computed by

    |s(n+1,k+1)|=n!n1=k11112=k112k21k1=21k1k11k=11k. (5.1)

    The formula (5.1) was derived in [41,Corollary 2.3] and can be reformulated as

    |s(n+1,k+1)|n!=nm=k|s(m,k)|m!

    for nk1. From the equation (1.5), by convention, we assume s(n,k)=0 for n<k and k,n<0. In recent years, the first kind Stirling numbers s(n,k) have been investigated in [39,40,41,42,45] and closely related references therein.

    Remark 5.2. For |x|<1, we have the following series expansions of arcsinx and its powers.

    1. The series expansion (3.2) of arcsinx can be rewritten as

    arcsinxx=1!n=0[(2n1)!!]2x2n(2n+1)!, (5.2)

    where (1)!!=1. Various forms of (5.2) can be found in [1,4.4.40] and [2,p. 121,6.41.1].

    2. The series expansion of (arcsinx)2 can be rearranged as

    (arcsinxx)2=2!n=0[(2n)!!]2x2n(2n+2)!. (5.3)

    The variants of (5.3) can be found in [2,p. 122,6.42.1], [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [5,pp. 50–51 and p. 287], [6,p. 384], [7,p. 2,(2.1)], [13,Lemma 2], [20,p. 308], [21,pp. 88-90], [22,p. 61,1.645], [32,p. 1011], [33,p. 453], [47,Section 6.3], [58], [60,p. 59,(2.56)], or [62,p. 676,(2.2)]. It is clear that the series expansion (5.3) and its equivalent forms have been rediscovered repeatedly. For more information on the history, dated back to 1899 or earlier, of the series expansion (5.3) and its equivalent forms, see [7,p. 2] and [32,p. 1011].

    3. The series expansion of (arcsinx)3 can be reformulated as

    (arcsinxx)3=3!n=0[(2n+1)!!]2[nk=01(2k+1)2]x2n(2n+3)!. (5.4)

    Different variants of (5.4) can be found in [2,p. 122,6.42.2], [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [11,p. 188,Example 1], [20,p. 308], [21,pp. 88–90], [22,p. 61,1.645], or [27,pp. 154–155,(832)].

    4. The series expansion of (arcsinx)4 can be restated as

    (arcsinxx)4=4!n=0[(2n+2)!!]2[nk=01(2k+2)2]x2n(2n+4)!. (5.5)

    There exist three variants of (5.5) in [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [7,p. 3,(2.2)], and [20,p. 309].

    5. Basing on the formula (2.21) in [28,p. 50], we concretely obtain

    (arcsinxx)5=5!2n=0[(2n+3)!!]2[(n+1k=01(2k+1)2)2n+1k=01(2k+1)4]x2n(2n+5)!. (5.6)

    6. In [7], the special series expansions

    (arcsinx2)2=12n=1x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)4=32n=1(n1m=11m2)x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)6=454n=1(n1m=11m2m1=112)x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)8=3152n=1(n1m=11m2m1=1121p=11p2)x2n(2nn)n2

    were listed. In general, it was obtained in [7,pp. 1–2] that

    (arcsinx2)2=(2)!n=1H(n)x2n(2nn)n2,N (5.7)

    and

    (arcsinx2)2+1=(2+1)!n=1G(n)(2nn)24n+1x2n+12n+1,{0}N, (5.8)

    where H1(n)=14, G0(n)=1,

    H+1(n)=14n1m1=11(2m1)2m11m2=11(2m2)2m11m=11(2m)2,

    and

    G(n)=n1m1=01(2m1+1)2m11m2=01(22+1)2m11m=01(2m+1)2.

    The convention is that the sum is zero if the starting index exceeds the finishing index.

    7. In [7,(2.9) and (4.3)], [25,p. 480,(88.2.2)], and [56,p. 124], there exist the formulas

    (arcsinxx)=n=0[(1k=1{nk1nk=0(2nk12nk)![(nk1nk)!]2(2nk12nk+1)122nk12nk})×(2n1)!(n1!)2(2n1+1)122n1]x2n (5.9)

    and

    (arcsinxx)=!n=0[nn1=0(2n1n1)2n1+1nn2=n1(2n22n1n2n1)2n2+2nn=n1(2n2n1nn1)2n+14n]xn. (5.10)

    All the power series expansions from (5.2) to (5.6) can also be deduced from Theorem 2.1.

    By the way, we notice that the quantity in the pair of bigger brackets, the coefficient of x2n, in the formula (5.9) has no explicit relation with n. This means that there must be some misprints and typos somewhere in the formula (5.9). On 30 January 2021, Christophe Vignat (Tulane University) pointed out that n0=n is the missing information in the formula (5.9).

    In [28,pp. 49–50,Section 2.4], the power series expansions of (arcsinx)k for 2k13 were concretely and explicitly written down in alternative forms. The main idea in the study of the power series expansions of (arcsinx)k for 2k13 was related with series representations for generalized logsine functions in [28,p. 50,(2.24) and (2.25)]. The special interest is special values of generalized logsine functions defined by [28,p. 50,(2.26) and (2.27)].

    In [54,Theorem 1.4] and [55,Theorem 2.1], the nth derivative of arcsinx was explicitly computed.

    In [43,44], three series expansions (5.2), (5.3), (5.4) and their first derivatives were used to derive known and new combinatorial identities and others.

    Because coefficients of x2n+21 and x2n+2 in (2.1) and (2.2) contain three times sums, coefficients of x2n and x2n+1 in (5.7) and (5.8) contain times sums, coefficients of x2n in (5.9) contain 1 times sums, and coefficients of xn in (5.10) contain times sums, we conclude that the series expansions (2.1) and (2.2) are more elegant, more operable, more computable, and more applicable.

    Remark 5.3. Two expressions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1 for series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 are very close and similar to, but different from, each other. Is there a unified expression for series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2? If yes, two closed-form formulas for B2n,k in Theorem 1.1 would also be unified. We believe that the formula

    exp(2aarcsinx2)=n=0(ia)n/2(ia+1)n/2(ix)nn! (5.11)

    mentioned in [7,p. 3,(2.7)] and collected in [25,p. 210,(10.49.33)] would be useful for unifying two expressions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1, where extended Pochhammer symbols

    (ia)n/2=Γ(ia+n2)Γ(ia)and(ia+1)n/2=Γ(ia+1n2)Γ(ia+1) (5.12)

    were defined in [25,p. 5,Section 2.2.3], and the Euler gamma function Γ(z) is defined [59,Chapter 3] by

    Γ(z)=limnn!nznk=0(z+k),zC{0,1,2,}.

    What are closed forms and why do we care closed forms? Please read the paper [8].

    Remark 5.4. In [2,p. 122,6.42], [27,pp. 154–155,(834)], [33,p. 452,Theorem], and [47,Section 6.3,Theorem 21,Sections 8 and 9], it was proved or collected that

    arcsinx1x2=n=022n(n!)2x2n+1(2n+1)!,|x|1. (5.13)

    In [6,p. 385], [47,Theorem 24], and [61,p. 174,(10)], it was proved that

    n=1(2x)2n(2nn)=x21x2+xarcsinx(1x2)3/2,|x|<1. (5.14)

    These series expansions (5.13) and (5.14) can be derived directly from the series expansion for (arcsinx)2 and are a special case of (4.9) for =1.

    Remark 5.5. The series expansion of the function 1x2arcsinx was listed in [2,p. 122,6.42.4] which can be corrected and reformulated as

    1x2arcsinx=x1!n=1[(2n2)!!]2(2n)x2n+1(2n+1)!,|x|1. (5.15)

    Basing on the relation

    (1x2)[(arcsinx)]=1x2(arcsinx)1

    and utilizing series expansions of (arcsinx)3 and (arcsinx)4, after simple operations, we can readily derive

    1x2(arcsinx)2=x22!n=1[(2n1)!!]2[(2n+1)n1k=01(2k+1)21]x2n+2(2n+2)! (5.16)

    and

    1x2(arcsinx)3=x33!n=1[(2n)!!]2[(2n+2)n1k=01(2k+2)21]x2n+3(2n+3)!. (5.17)

    From (4.8) and (4.9), we can generalize the series expansions (5.15), (5.16), and (5.17) as

    1x2(arcsinx)22=x22+(1)141(22)!×n=1[A(,n)(2n+22)(2n+23)A(,n1)]x2n+22(2n+22)! (5.18)

    and

    1x2(arcsinx)21=x21+(1)1(21)!×n=1[B(,n)(2n+21)(2n+22)B(,n1)]x2n+21(2n+21)! (5.19)

    for N, where

    A(,n)=4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12),B(,n)=4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1),

    and T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6). Considering both coefficients of x22 and x21 in the power series expansions (5.18) and (5.19) must be 1, we acquire two combinatorial identities

    2q=0T(;q,2;12)=(1)4and2q=0T(;q,2;1)=(1)

    for {0}N, where T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6).

    Remark 5.6. Making use of Theorem 1.1, we readily obtain the first several values of the sequence (1.3) in Tables 1 and 2.

    Table 1.  The sequence B2n,2k1 in (1.3) for 1n,k8.
    B2n,2k1 k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 k=5 k=6 k=7 k=8
    n=1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=2 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=3 2257 59 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=4 1225 42 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=5 89302511 3951 359 0 0 0 0 0
    n=6 10805602513 25155245 1155 0 0 0 0 0
    n=7 1217431215 85621185 314314 500581 0 0 0 0
    n=8 410883035062517 18974980350 2847704863 \frac{140140}{3} 0 0 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  The sequence {\rm{B}}_{2n, 2k} in (1.3) for 1\le n, k \le 8 .
    {\rm{B}}_{2n, 2k} k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 k=5 k=6 k=7 k=8
    n=1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=2 \frac{1}{3} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=4 \frac{2067}{5} \frac{35}{27} 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=5 30525 210 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=6 \frac{23483925}{7} 35211 \frac{385}{27} 0 0 0 0 0
    n=7 516651345 \frac{106790684}{15} 7007 0 0 0 0 0
    n=8 106480673775 \frac{8891683281}{5} 2892890 \frac{25025}{81} 0 0 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the papers [46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55] and closely related references therein, the authors and their coauthors discovered and applied closed form expressions for many special values of the second kind Bell polynomials {\rm{B}}_{n, k}(x_1, x_2, \dotsc, x_{n-k+1}) for n\ge k\ge0 .

    Remark 5.7. Taking \theta = \frac{\pi}{3} in (4.3) and (4.4) give

    \begin{align*} {\rm{Ls}}_j^{(2\ell-2)}\biggl(\frac{\pi}{3}\biggr) & = (-1)^{\ell}(4\ell-4)!!(\ln2)^{j-2\ell+1} \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\Biggl[\frac{1}{{(2n+2\ell-2)!}}\sum\limits_{q = 0}^{2\ell-2} T\biggl(n+\ell-1;q,2\ell-2;\frac12\biggr)\Biggr] \\ &\quad\times\sum\limits_{\alpha = 0}^{j-2\ell+1}(-1)^{\alpha} \binom{j-2\ell+1}{\alpha} \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\alpha}\frac{\langle\alpha\rangle_{k}} {(2n+2\ell-1)^{k+1}(\ln2)^{k}} \end{align*}

    and

    \begin{align*} {\rm{Ls}}_j^{(2\ell-1)}\biggl(\frac{\pi}{3}\biggr) & = (-1)^{\ell}(2\ell-1)!(\ln2)^{j-2\ell}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\Biggl[\frac{1}{(2n+2\ell-1)!} \sum\limits_{q = 0}^{2\ell-2} T(n+\ell-1;q,2\ell-2;1)\Biggr]\\ &\quad\times\sum\limits_{\alpha = 0}^{j-2\ell}(-1)^{\alpha}\binom{j-2\ell}{\alpha} \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\alpha} \frac{\langle\alpha\rangle_{k}}{(2n+2\ell)^{k+1}(\ln2)^{k}} \end{align*}

    for \ell\in\mathbb{N} , where \langle z\rangle_n for z\in\mathbb{C} and n\in\{0\}\cup\mathbb{N} denotes the falling factorial defined by (2.4) and T(r; q, j;\rho) is defined by (1.6). In [28,p. 50], it was stated that the values {\rm{Ls}}_j^{(\ell)}\bigl(\frac{\pi}{3}\bigr) have been related to special interest in the calculation of the multiloop Feynman diagrams [19,20].

    Similarly, we can also deduce series representations for special values of the logsine function {\rm{Ls}}_j^{(\ell)}(\theta) at \theta = \frac{\pi}{2} , \frac{\pi}{4} , \frac{\pi}{6} and \theta = \pi . These special values were originally derived in [30,31,34] and also considered in [3,9,10,14,15,16,17,19,20,28,29,37,38,57] and closely related references therein.

    Remark 5.8. This paper is a revised version of electronic arXiv preprints [23,24].

    The authors thank

    1. Frank Oertel (Philosophy, Logic & Scientific Method Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; f.oertel@email.de) for his citing the paper [53] in his electronic preprint [35]. On 10 October 2020, this citation and the Google Scholar Alerts leaded the authors to notice the numbers (1.2) in [35]. On 26 January 2021, he sent the important paper [7] to the authors and others. We communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    2. Chao-Ping Chen (Henan Polytechnic University, China; chenchaoping@sohu.com) for his asking the combinatorial identity in [43,Theorem 2.2], or the one in [44,Theorem 2.1], via Tencent QQ on 18 December 2020. Since then, we communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    3. Mikhail Yu. Kalmykov (Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Russia; kalmykov.mikhail@googlemail.com) for his noticing [43,Remark 4.2] and providing the references [19,20,28,30,31,34] on 9 and 27 January 2021. We communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    4. Li Yin (Binzhou University, China; yinli7979@163.com) for his frequent communications and helpful discussions with the authors via Tencent QQ online.

    5. Christophe Vignat (Department of Physics, Universite d'Orsay, France; Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, USA; cvignat@tulane.edu) for his sending electronic version of those pages containing the formulas (5.9), (5.11), and (5.12) in [25,56] on 30 January 2021 and for his sending electronic version of the monograph [27] on 8 February 2021.

    6. Frédéric Ouimet (California Institute of Technology, USA; ouimetfr@caltech.edu) for his photocopying by Caltech Library Services and transferring via ResearchGate those two pages containing the formulas (5.9) and (5.11) on 2 February 2021.

    7. anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.

    The author Dongkyu Lim was partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea under Grant NRF-2021R1C1C1010902, Republic of Korea.

    All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.



    [1] A. B. Aliev, G. I. Yusifova, Nonexistence of global solutions of Cauchy problems for systems of semilinear hyperbolic equations with positive initial energy, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 211 (2017), 1–10.
    [2] A. B. Aliev, A. A. Kazimov, Global Solvability and Behavior of Solutions of the Cauchy Problem for a System of two Semilinear Hyperbolic Equations with Dissipation, Differ. Equations, 49 (2013), 457–467. doi: 10.1134/S001226611304006X
    [3] A. B. Aliev, G. I. Yusifova, Nonexistence of global solutions of the Cauchy problem for the systems of three semilinear hyperbolic equations with positive initial energy, Transactions Issue Mathematics, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, 37 (2017), 11–19.
    [4] A. Braik, A. Beniani, Kh. Zennir, Well-posedness and general decay for Moore–Gibson–Thompson equation in viscoelasticity with delay term, Ric. Mat., (2021), 1–22.
    [5] S. Boulaaras, A. Draifia, Kh. Zennir, General decay of nonlinear viscoelastic Kirchhoff equation with Balakrishnan‐Taylor damping and logarithmic nonlinearity, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 42 (2019), 4795–4814. doi: 10.1002/mma.5693
    [6] M. M. Cavalcanti, V. N. Domingos Cavalcanti, J. Ferreira, Existence and uniform decay for a non-linear viscoelastic equation with strong damping, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 24 (2001), 1043–1053. doi: 10.1002/mma.250
    [7] M. M. Cavalcanti, V. N. Domingos Cavalcanti, I. Lasiecka, W. M. Claudete, Intrinsic decay rates for the energy of a nonlinear viscoelastic equation modeling the vibrations of thin rods with variable density, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 6 (2017), 121–145. doi: 10.1515/anona-2016-0027
    [8] E. F. Doungmo Goufo, I. Tchangou Toudjeu, Analysis of recent fractional evolution equations and applications, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 126 (2019), 337–350. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.016
    [9] E. F. Doungmo Goufo, Yazir Khan, Stella Mugisha, Control parameter & solutions to generalized evolution equations of stationarity, relaxation and diffusion, Results Phys., 9 (2018), 1502–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.051
    [10] H. Dridi, Kh. Zennir, Well-posedness and energy decay for some thermoelastic systems of Timoshenko type with Kelvin-Voigt damping, SeMA Journal, (2021), 1–16.
    [11] H. Dridi, B. Feng, Kh. Zennir, Stability of Timoshenko system coupled with thermal law of Gurtin-Pipkin affecting on shear force, Appl. Anal., (2021), 1–22.
    [12] B. Feng, Y. Qin, M. Zhang, General decay for a system of nonlinear viscoelastic wave equations with weak damping, Bound. Value Probl., 2012 (2012), 1–11. doi: 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-1
    [13] N. I. Karachalios, N. M. Stavrakakis, Global existence and blow-up results for some nonlinear wave equations on \mathbb R^N, Adv. Differ. Eq., 6 (2001), 155–174.
    [14] W. Lian, R. Xu, Global well-posedness of nonlinear wave equation with weak and strong damping terms and logarithmic source term, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 9 (2020), 613–632.
    [15] G. Liu, S. Xia, Global existence and finite time blow up for a class of semilinear wave equations on {\mathbb R}^{N}, Comput. Math. Appl., 70 (2015), 1345–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2015.07.021
    [16] W. Liu, Global existence, asymptotic behavior and blow-up of solutions for coupled Klein–Gordon equations with damping terms, Nonlinear Anal-Theor, 73 (2010), 244–255. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2010.03.017
    [17] Q. Li, L. He, General decay and blow-up of solutions for a nonlinear viscoelastic wave equation with strong damping, Bound. Value Probl., 2018 (2018), 1–22. doi: 10.1186/s13661-017-0918-2
    [18] T. Miyasita, Kh. Zennir, A sharper decay rate for a viscoelastic wave equation with power nonlinearity, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 1138–1144. doi: 10.1002/mma.5919
    [19] S. C. Oukouomi Noutchie, E. F. Doungmo Goufo, Exact Solutions of Fragmentation Equations with General Fragmentation Rates and Separable Particles Distribution Kernels, Math. Probl. Eng., 2014 (2014), 1–5.
    [20] P. G. Papadopoulos, N. M. Stavrakakis, Global existence and blow-up results for an equation of Kirchhoff type on \mathbb R^N, Topol. Meth. Nonl. Anal., 17 (2001), 91–109. doi: 10.12775/TMNA.2001.006
    [21] S. T. Wu, General decay of solutions for a nonlinear system of viscoelastic wave equations with degenerate damping and source terms, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 406 (2013), 34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.04.029
    [22] Y. Ye, Global existence and nonexistence of solutions for coupled nonlinear wave equations with damping and source terms, B. Korean Math. Soc., 51 (2014), 1697–1710. doi: 10.4134/BKMS.2014.51.6.1697
    [23] Kh. Zennir, General decay of solutions for damped wave equation of Kirchhoff type with density in {\mathbb R}^{n}, Annali dell'Universita'di Ferrara, 61 (2015), 381–394. doi: 10.1007/s11565-015-0223-x
    [24] Kh. Zennir, Stabilization for solutions of plate equation with time-varying delay and weak-viscoelasticity in {\bf{R}}^n, Russian Math., 64 (2020), 21–33.
    [25] Kh. Zennir, M. Bayoud, S. Georgiev, Decay of solution for degenerate wave equation of Kirchhoff type in viscoelasticity, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 4 (2018), 1–18.
    [26] Kh. Zennir, T. Miyasita, Dynamics of a coupled system for nonlinear damped wave equations with variable exponents, ZAMM Journal of applied mathematics and mechanics: Zeitschrift fur angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, (2020), e202000094.
    [27] Kh. Zennir, S. S. Alodhaibi, A Novel Decay Rate for a Coupled System of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Wave Equations, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 203. doi: 10.3390/math8020203
    [28] S. Zitouni, Kh. Zennir, On the existence and decay of solution for viscoelastic wave equation with nonlinear source in weighted spaces, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 66 (2017), 337–353.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2752) PDF downloads(146) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog