
Citation: D. Preethi, J. Vimala, S. Rajareega. A systematic study in the applications of fuzzy hyperlattice[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1695-1705. doi: 10.3934/math.2021100
[1] | Abdelghani Taouti, Waheed Ahmad Khan . Fuzzy subnear-semirings and fuzzy soft subnear-semirings. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2268-2286. doi: 10.3934/math.2021137 |
[2] | Atiqe Ur Rahman, Muhammad Saeed, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa, Walaa Abdullah Afifi . Decision making algorithmic techniques based on aggregation operations and similarity measures of possibility intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft sets. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3866-3895. doi: 10.3934/math.2022214 |
[3] | Attaullah, Shahzaib Ashraf, Noor Rehman, Asghar Khan, Muhammad Naeem, Choonkil Park . Improved VIKOR methodology based on q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy rough aggregation information: application in multi expert decision making. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 9524-9548. doi: 10.3934/math.2022530 |
[4] | Noura Omair Alshehri, Rania Saeed Alghamdi, Noura Awad Al Qarni . Development of novel distance measures for picture hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in medical diagnosis. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 270-288. doi: 10.3934/math.2025013 |
[5] | Aneeza Imtiaz, Umer Shuaib . On conjunctive complex fuzzification of Lagrange's theorem of ξ−CFSG. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18881-18897. doi: 10.3934/math.2023961 |
[6] | Shovan Dogra, Madhumangal Pal, Qin Xin . Picture fuzzy sub-hyperspace of a hyper vector space and its application in decision making problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13361-13382. doi: 10.3934/math.2022738 |
[7] | Zhimin Liu, Ripeng Huang, Songtao Shao . Data-driven two-stage fuzzy random mixed integer optimization model for facility location problems under uncertain environment. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13292-13312. doi: 10.3934/math.2022734 |
[8] | Esmail Hassan Abdullatif Al-Sabri, Muhammad Rahim, Fazli Amin, Rashad Ismail, Salma Khan, Agaeb Mahal Alanzi, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa . Multi-criteria decision-making based on Pythagorean cubic fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators for investment management. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16961-16988. doi: 10.3934/math.2023866 |
[9] | Muhammad Bilal Khan, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Thabet Abdeljawad, Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Ali Althobaiti . Some fuzzy-interval integral inequalities for harmonically convex fuzzy-interval-valued functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 349-370. doi: 10.3934/math.2022024 |
[10] | Doaa Al-Sharoa . (α1, 2, β1, 2)-complex intuitionistic fuzzy subgroups and its algebraic structure. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8082-8116. doi: 10.3934/math.2023409 |
Algebraic structures play an outstanding role in mathematical science with vast ranging applications in various disciplines such as control engineering, theoretical physics, information sciences, computer sciences, coding theory, etc. This gives plenteous encouragement for researchers to develop numerous concepts and results from abstract algebra.
The composition of two elements forms an element in classical algebraic hyperstructure, but the composition of two elements forms a set in algebraic hyperstructure hence algebraic hyperstructures are the generalizations of classical algebraic structures. Comparison of multiple domains are possible through hyperstructure theory, it leads to the development of many applications. Many research works exist on the applications of hyperstructure theory [21,22]. Moreover, the notion of hyperlattice was introduced by Konstantinidou and Mittas in [8]. Rasouli and Davvaz developed the theory of hyperlattices and proposed various interesting results [17,18], which enhanced the hyperlattice theory.
Some new interesting topics developed from the combination of fuzzy set theory and hyperalgebraic systems which have drawn attention of many computer scientists and mathematicians. Many papers have been developed as a recent work on fuzzy hyperstructures (see [19,28]). Fuzzy hyperlattice was introduced by Pengfei He, Xiaolong Xin [13] and they studied some connections between hyperlattices and fuzzy hyperlattices.
Every fields of science attempt to and desire to make use of mathematical models in the process of predicting, whenever and wherever possible and also describing the numerous phenomena under subject. In this article, we define some real life models of fuzzy hyperlattice. For that we took some data from Biology and Physics.
The paper is arranged in the following manner. In Section 2, we recall some basic notions. Section 3 deals with three applications of fuzzy hyperlattice. Section 4 ends with a conclusion.
The generalizations of classical algebraic structures are the algebraic hyperstructures [13,12,2]. In algebraic hyperstructure, the composition of two elements is a set. If H be a nonempty set, P∗(H) be the set of all nonempty subsets of H, then consider a map
fi:H×H⟶P∗(H)
where i∈{1,2,...,h} and h is a positive integer. The maps fi are called hyperoperations. An algebraic system (H,f1,..,fh) is called a hyperstructure. Usually a hyperstructure involves two hyperoperations.
Let L be a nonempty set and P∗(L) be the set of all nonempty subsets of L. A hyperoperation on L is a map ⊕ : L×L⟶P∗(L), which associates a nonempty subset u⊕v with any pair (u, v) of elements of L×L.
If A and B are nonempty subsets of L, for u,v,x∈L, then we denote
(1) x⊕A={x}⊕A=⋃u∈A(x⊕u), A⊕x=A⊕{x}=⋃u∈A(u⊕x);
(2) A⊕B=⋃u∈A,v∈B(u⊕v).
Definition 2.1. [13,6] Consider a nonempty set L with two hyperoperations "⊗" and "⊕". The triple (L,⊗,⊕) is called a hyperlattice if it satisfies the following conditions, ∀ u,v,w∈L,
(1) (Idempotent laws) u∈u⊗u, u∈u⊕u;
(2) (Commutative laws) u⊗v=v⊗u, u⊕v=v⊕u;
(3) (Associative laws) (u⊗v)⊗w=u⊗(v⊗w), (u⊕v)⊕w=u⊕(v⊕w);
(4) (Absorption laws) u∈u⊗(u⊕v), u∈u⊕(u⊗v).
Definition 2.2. [29] Let X be a set. A function A:X⟶[0,1] is known as a fuzzy relation on X.
Definition 2.3. [29] A fuzzy relation A is a fuzzy partial order relation if A is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive.
Definition 2.4. [29] Let (X,A) be a fuzzy poset. (X,A) is a fuzzy lattice if and only if x∨y and x∧y exist ∀ x,y∈X.
Definition 2.5. If A is a nonempty subset of L, then the characteristic function of A is χA, where ∀, x∈L,
χA(x)={1,x∈A0,x∉A |
Definition 2.6. [13] Consider a nonempty set L with two fuzzy hyperoperations ⊗ and ⊕ (F∗(L) be the set of all non zero fuzzy subsets of L. The mapping of a fuzzy hyperoperation is of the form ∘:L×L⟶F∗(L)). The triple (L,⊗,⊕) is called a fuzzy hyperlattice if it satisfies the following conditions, ∀ u,v,w∈L,
(ⅰ) (Fuzzy idempotent laws) (u⊗u)(u)>0, (u⊕u)(u)>0;
(ⅱ) (Fuzzy commutative laws) u⊗v=v⊗u, u⊕v=v⊕u;
(ⅲ) (Fuzzy associative laws) (u⊗v)⊗w=u⊗(v⊗w), (u⊕v)⊕w=u⊕(v⊕w);
(ⅳ) (Fuzzy absorption laws) (u⊗(u⊕v))(u)>0, (u⊕(u⊗v))(u)>0.
Note: [13] If U and V are two non zero fuzzy subsets, ∀u,x∈L then,
(ⅰ) (u∘U)(x)=supt∈L{(u∘t)(x)∧U(t)}.
(U∘u)(x)=supt∈L{U(t)∧(t∘u)(x)}.
(ⅱ) (U∘V)(x)=supp∈L,q∈L{U(p)∧(p∘q)(x)∧V(q)}.
Example 2.7. [13] Consider a lattice (L,∧,∨). If the fuzzy hyperoperations on L defined by : ∀ u,v∈L, u×v=χ{u,v} and u+v=χu∧v, then (L,×,+) is a fuzzy hyperlattice.
Example 2.8. [13] Consider a lattice (L,∧,∨). If the fuzzy hyperoperations on L defined by : ∀ u,v∈L, u×v=χ{u,v} and ∀ x∈L,
(u+v)(x)={1/2,x=u∧v0,otherwise |
Then (L,×,+) is a fuzzy hyperlattice.
Example 2.9. [13] Consider a lattice (L,∧,∨). If the fuzzy hyperoperations on L defined by: ∀ u,v∈L, u×v=χu∨v and ∀ x∈L,
(u+v)(x)={1/2,x=u∧v0,otherwise |
Then (L,×,+) is a fuzzy hyperlattice.
This section consists of three subsections. The subsections deal with three applications of fuzzy hyperlattice.
Mendel crossed some varieties of Drosophila melanogaster that differed in two characteristics such as colour of bodies and length of wings [3].
For example:
P Generation: Grey bodies; Long wings (GGLL genotype) ⊗ Black bodies; Short wings (ggll genotype)
↓
F1 : Grey bodies; Long wings (GgLl genotype) and
F1×F1 : Grey bodies; Long wings (GgLl genotype) ⊗ Grey bodies; Long wings(GgLl genotype)
↓
F2 : Grey bodies; Long wings (GGLL, GgLl, GgLL and GGLl genotypes) Grey bodies; Short wings (GGll and Ggll genotypes) Black bodies; Long wings (ggLL and ggLl genotypes) Black bodies; Short wings (ggll genotype) Figure 1, refers the possible outcomes of F2 generations.
Now, let us consider the Long wings and Grey bodies by A, Long wings and Black bodies by B, Short wings and Grey bodies by C, Short wings and Black bodies by D. Hence we have Table 1,
× | A | B | C | D |
A | A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D |
B | A, B, C, D | B, D | A, B, C, D | B, D |
C | A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D | C, D | C, D |
D | A, B, C, D | B, D | C, D | D |
Let L={A,B,C,D}. Here for all M,S∈L, we define the fuzzy hyperoperations '⊕' and '⊗' by,
M⊕S=χ{M,S} and
M⊗S=χL
Now let us check whether the above defined fuzzy hyperoperations satisfies the conditions of fuzzy hyperlattice.
Condition 1: Fuzzy idempotent laws of fuzzy hyperlattice:
(A⊕A)(A)=χ{A,A}(A)=1>0(B⊕B)(B)=χ{B,B}(B)=1>0(C⊕C)(C)=χ{C,C}(C)=1>0(D⊕D)(D)=χ{D,D}(D)=1>0 |
(A⊗A)(A)=χ{L}(A)=1>0(B⊗B)(B)=χ{L}(B)=1>0(C⊗C)(C)=χ{L}(C)=1>0(D⊗D)(D)=χ{L}(D)=1>0 |
Condition 2: Fuzzy commutative laws of fuzzy hyperlattice:
(ⅰ) (A⊕B)=χ{A,B}=χ{B,A}=(B⊕A)
(A⊕C)=χ{A,C}=χ{C,A}=(C⊕A)
Similarly, (A⊕D)=(D⊕A), (B⊕C)=(C⊕B), (B⊕D)=(D⊕B), (C⊕D)=(D⊕C).
(ⅱ) (A⊗B)=χ{L}=(B⊗A)
(A⊗C)=χ{L}=(C⊗A)
Similarly, (A⊗D)=(D⊗A), (B⊗C)=(C⊗B), (B⊗D)=(D⊗B), (C⊗D)=(D⊗C).
Condition 3: Fuzzy associative laws of fuzzy hyperlattice:
(A⊕B)⊕A=χ{A,B}⊕A=χ{A,B};A⊕(B⊕A)=χ{A,B}(A⊕C)⊕A=χ{A,C}⊕A=χ{A,C};A⊕(C⊕A)=χ{A,C}(A⊕D)⊕A=χ{A,D}⊕A=χ{A,D};A⊕(D⊕A)=χ{A,D}(B⊕A)⊕A=χ{B,A}⊕A=χ{A,B};B⊕(A⊕A)=χ{A,B}(B⊕C)⊕A=χ{B,C}⊕A=χ{A,B,C};B⊕(C⊕A)=χ{A,B,C}(B⊕D)⊕A=χ{B,D}⊕A=χ{A,B,D};B⊕(D⊕A)=χ{A,B,D}(C⊕A)⊕A=χ{C,A}⊕A=χ{A,C};C⊕(A⊕A)=χ{A,C}(C⊕B)⊕A=χ{C,B}⊕A=χ{A,B,C};C⊕(B⊕A)=χ{A,B,C}(C⊕D)⊕A=χ{C,D}⊕A=χ{A,C,D};C⊕(D⊕A)=χ{A,C,D}(D⊕A)⊕A=χ{D,A}⊕A=χ{A,D};D⊕(A⊕A)=χ{A,D}(D⊕B)⊕A=χ{D,B}⊕A=χ{A,B,D};D⊕(B⊕A)=χ{A,B,D}(D⊕C)⊕A=χ{D,C}⊕A=χ{A,C,D};D⊕(C⊕A)=χ{A,C,D} |
(A⊕B)⊕B=χ{A,B};A⊕(B⊕B)=χ{A,B}(A⊕C)⊕B=χ{A,B,C};A⊕(C⊕B)=χ{A,B,C}(A⊕D)⊕B=χ{A,B,D};A⊕(D⊕B)=χ{A,B,D}(B⊕A)⊕B=χ{A,B};B⊕(A⊕B)=χ{A,B}(B⊕C)⊕B=χ{B,C};B⊕(C⊕B)=χ{B,C}B⊕D)⊕B=χ{B,D};B⊕(D⊕B)=χ{B,D}(C⊕A)⊕B=χ{A,B,C};C⊕(A⊕B)=χ{A,B,C}(C⊕B)⊕B=χ{B,C};C⊕(B⊕B)=χ{B,C}(C⊕D)⊕B=χ{B,C,D};C⊕(D⊕B)=χ{B,C,D}(D⊕A)⊕B=χ{A,B,D};D⊕(A⊕B)=χ{A,B,D}(D⊕B)⊕B=χ{B,D};D⊕(B⊕B)=χ{B,D}(D⊕C)⊕B=χ{B,C,D};D⊕(C⊕B)=χ{B,C,D} |
(A⊕B)⊕C=χ{A,B,C};A⊕(B⊕C)=χ{A,B,C}(A⊕C)⊕C=χ{A,C};A⊕(C⊕C)=χ{A,C}(A⊕D)⊕C=χ{A,C,D};A⊕(D⊕C)=χ{A,C,D}(B⊕A)⊕C=χ{A,B,C};B⊕(A⊕C)=χ{A,B,C}(B⊕C)⊕C=χ{B,C};B⊕(C⊕C)=χ{B,C}(B⊕D)⊕C=χ{B,C,D};B⊕(D⊕C)=χ{B,C,D}(C⊕A)⊕C=χ{A,C};C⊕(A⊕C)=χ{A,C}(C⊕B)⊕C=χ{B,C};C⊕(B⊕C)=χ{B,C}(C⊕D)⊕C=χ{C,D};C⊕(D⊕C)=χ{C,D}(D⊕A)⊕C=χ{A,C,D};D⊕(A⊕C)=χ{A,C,D}(D⊕B)⊕C=χ{B,C,D};D⊕(B⊕C)=χ{B,C,D}(D⊕C)⊕C=χ{C,D};D⊕(C⊕C)=χ{C,D} |
(A⊕B)⊕D=χ{A,B,D};A⊕(B⊕D)=χ{A,B,D}(A⊕C)⊕D=χ{A,C,D};A⊕(C⊕D)=χ{A,C,D}(A⊕D)⊕D=χ{A,D};A⊕(D⊕D)=χ{A,D}(B⊕A)⊕D=χ{A,B,D};B⊕(A⊕D)=χ{A,B,D}(B⊕C)⊕D=χ{B,C,D};B⊕(C⊕D)=χ{B,C,D}(B⊕D)⊕D=χ{B,D};B⊕(D⊕D)=χ{B,D}(C⊕A)⊕D=χ{A,C,D};C⊕(A⊕D)=χ{A,C,D}(C⊕B)⊕D=χ{B,C,D};C⊕(B⊕D)=χ{B,C,D}(C⊕D)⊕D=χ{C,D};C⊕(D⊕D)=χ{C,D}(D⊕A)⊕D=χ{A,D};D⊕(A⊕D)=χ{A,D}(D⊕B)⊕D=χ{B,D};D⊕(B⊕D)=χ{B,D}(D⊕C)⊕D=χ{C,D};D⊕(C⊕D)=χ{C,D} |
Similarly, the fuzzy associative law satisfies for the fuzzy hyperoperation ⊗.
Condition 4: Fuzzy absorption laws of fuzzy hyperlattice:
(A⊕(A⊗B))(A)=(A⊕χ{L})(A)=χ{L}(A)=1>0(A⊕(A⊗C))(A)=(A⊕χ{L})(A)=χ{L}(A)=1>0(A⊕(A⊗D))(A)=(A⊕χ{L})(A)=χ{L}(A)=1>0(B⊕(B⊗A))(B)=(B⊕χ{L})(B)=χ{L}(B)=1>0(B⊕(B⊗C))(B)=(B⊕χ{L})(B)=χ{L}(B)=1>0(B⊕(B⊗D))(B)=(B⊕χ{L})(B)=χ{L}(B)=1>0(C⊕(C⊗A))(C)=(C⊕χ{L})(C)=χ{L}(C)=1>0(C⊕(C⊗B))(C)=(C⊕χ{L})(C)=χ{L}(C)=1>0(C⊕(C⊗D))(C)=(C⊕χ{L})(C)=χ{L}(C)=1>0(D⊕(D⊗A))(D)=(D⊕χ{L})(D)=χ{L}(D)=1>0(D⊕(D⊗B))(D)=(D⊕χ{L})(D)=χ{L}(D)=1>0(D⊕(D⊗C))(D)=(D⊕χ{L})(D)=χ{L}(D)=1>0 |
(A⊗(A⊕B))(A)=(A⊗χ{A,B})(A)=χ{L}(A)=1>0(A⊗(A⊕C))(A)=(A⊗χ{A,C})(A)=χ{L}(A)=1>0(A⊗(A⊕D))(A)=(A⊗χ{A,D})(A)=χ{L}(A)=1>0(B⊗(B⊕A))(B)=(B⊗χ{B,A})(B)=χ{L}(B)=1>0(B⊗(B⊕C))(B)=(B⊗χ{B,C})(B)=χ{L}(B)=1>0(B⊗(B⊕D))(B)=(B⊗χ{B,D})(B)=χ{L}(B)=1>0(C⊗(C⊕A))(C)=(C⊗χ{C,A})(C)=χ{L}(C)=1>0(C⊗(C⊕B))(C)=(C⊗χ{C,B})(C)=χ{L}(C)=1>0(C⊗(C⊕D))(C)=(C⊗χ{C,D})(C)=χ{L}(C)=1>0(D⊗(D⊕A))(D)=(D⊗χ{D,A})(D)=χ{L}(D)=1>0(D⊗(D⊕B))(D)=(D⊗χ{D,B})(D)=χ{L}(D)=1>0(D⊗(D⊕C))(D)=(D⊗χ{D,C})(D)=χ{L}(D)=1>0 |
Here the fuzzy hyperoperations satisfies the fuzzy idempotent, fuzzy commutative, fuzzy associative and fuzzy absorption laws of Fuzzy Hyperlattice.
Hence the dihybrid cross in Drosophila melanogaster is an application of Fuzzy Hyperlattice.
[3,25,7] As an extension to the work on monohybrid crosses Mendel crossed two different characteristics peas [7,25]. For example:
P : Tall; Round (TTRR genotype) ⊗ Short; Wrinkled(ttrr genotype)
↓
F1 : All Tall; Round (TtRr genotype) and
F1×F1 : Tall; Round (TtRr genotype) ⊗ Tall; Round (TtRr genotype)
↓
F2 : Tall; Round (TTRR, TtRr, TtRR, TTRr genotypes) Short; Round (ttRR and ttRr genotypes) Tall; Wrinkled(TTrr and Ttrr genotypes) Short; Wrinkled (ttrr genotype)
Now, let us consider the Round and Tall by P, Wrinkled and Tall by Q, Round and Dwarf by R, Wrinkled and Dwarf by S. We have Table 2,
× | P | Q | R | S |
P | P, Q, R, S | P, Q, R, S | P, Q, R, S | P, Q, R, S |
Q | P, Q, R, S | Q, S | P, Q, R, S | Q, S |
R | P, Q, R, S | P, Q, R, S | R, S | R, S |
S | P, Q, R, S | Q, S | R, S | S |
Let L={P,Q,R,S}. Here for all M,S∈L, we define the fuzzy hyperoperations '⊕' and '⊗' by,
M⊕S=χ{M,S} and
M⊗S=χL
Here the fuzzy hyperoperations satisfies the fuzzy idempotent, fuzzy commutative, fuzzy associative and fuzzy absorption laws of fuzzy hyperlattice.
The dihybrid cross in Pisum sativum is an application of fuzzy hyperlattice.
[4] In particle physics, a particle with no substructure are called as a fundamental particle or elementary particle, i.e. it is not made up of tiny particles and it is the building bricks of the universe (i.e., ) all the particles of the universe are made up of elementary particles. Some theories had been developed to explain the elementary particles and the interacting forces amidst them. Among which, the significant one is the Standard Model (SM) [11]. The Quarks, Leptons and Gauge bosons are the elementary particles in the SM.
Leptons: The significant part of the SM is leptons, particularly the electrons are the main components of atoms. Leptons are one of the major elementary particles because it can be found anywhere in the universe freely. In this paper we considered this particles only. The six types of leptons are as follows, the electron (e), electron neutrino (νe), muon (μ), muon neutrino (νμ), tau (τ) and tau neutrino (ντ). The corresponding antiparticle of each leptons are called as antileptons. The electronic leptons, the muonic leptons and the tauonic leptons are the first generation, second generation, third generation respectively.
Electronic Leptons: The electron (e), electron neutrino (νe) and their antiparticles, positron (e+) and electron antineutrino ¯νe respectively.
Muonic Leptons: Muon (μ), muon neutrino (νμ) and their antiparticles, antimuon (μ+) and muon antineutrino ¯νμ.
Tauonic Leptons: Tau (τ), tau neutrino (ντ) and their antiparticles, antitau (τ+) and tau antineutrino ¯ντ.
Totally, the lepton group consists of 12 particles { e, νe, μ, νμ,τ,ντ, e+, ¯νe, μ+, ¯νμ, τ+, ¯ντ }. In the leptons group, the electric charge Q of the electron, muon and tau is -1 and the neutrinos are neutral. By the definition of antiparticle, the electric charge Q of positron, antimuon and antitau is -1 but the antineutrinos are neutral. The interactions between the leptons are shown in the Figure 2.
Let L = { e, νe, μ, νμ,τ,ντ, e+, ¯νe, μ+, ¯νμ, τ+, ¯ντ }. Here for all M,S∈L, we define the fuzzy hyperoperations '⊕' and '⊗' by,
M⊕S=χ{M,S} and
M⊗S=χL
Here the fuzzy hyperoperations satisfies the fuzzy idempotent, fuzzy commutative, fuzzy associative and fuzzy absorption laws of Fuzzy Hyperlattice.
Hence the interaction between leptons is an application of fuzzy hyperlattice.
In this manuscript we developed some real life applications of fuzzy hyperlattice. Several representations of fuzzy hyperlattice are proffered from different areas such as Biology and Physics (i.e) it is presented that the definition of fuzzy hyperlattice is exactly apt for the outcomes of dihybrid cross in Biology and the interactions between the leptons in Physics. In future, we will extend the theory of fuzzy hyperlattice in order to develop varieties of applications in various fields of Science.
The article has been written with the joint financial support of RUSA-Phase 2.0 grant sanctioned vide letter No.F 24-51/2014-U, Policy (TN Multi-Gen), Dept. of Edn. Govt. of India, Dt. 09.10.2018, UGC-SAP (DRS-I) vide letter No.F.510/8/DRS-I/2016(SAP-I) Dt. 23.08.2016, DST-PURSE 2nd Phase programme vide letter No. SR/PURSE Phase 2/38 (G) Dt. 21.02.2017 and DST (FST - level I) 657876570 vide letter No.SR/FIST/MS-I/2018/17 Dt. 20.12.2018.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
[1] | P. Corsini, V. Leoreanu-Fotea, Applications of hyperstructure theory, Kluwer Dordrecht, 2003. |
[2] | B. Davvaz, V. Leoreanu-Fotea, Hyperring theory and applications, International Academic Press, USA, 2007. |
[3] |
B. Davvaz, A. D. Nezhad, M. M. Heidari, Inheritance examples of algebraic hyperstructures, Inf. Sci., 224 (2013), 180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.023
![]() |
[4] |
A. D. Nezhada, M. Nadjafikhahb, S. M. Moosavi Nejadc, B. Davvaz, The algebraic hyperstructure of elementary particles in physical theory, Indian J. Phys., 86 (2012), 1027-1032. DOI: 10.1007/s12648-012-0151-x. doi: 10.1007/s12648-012-0151-x
![]() |
[5] |
G. Birkhoff, Lattice Ordered Grou, Annals Math., Second Series, 43 (1942), 298-331. doi: 10.2307/1968871
![]() |
[6] | X. Z. Guo, X. L. Xin, Hyperlattices, Pure Appl. Math., 20 (2004), 40-43. |
[7] | D. L. Hartl, E. W. Jones, Genetics: Principles and Analysis, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 1998. |
[8] | M. Konstantinidou, J. Mittas, An introduction to the theory of hyperlattices, Math. Balkanica., 7 (1977), 187-193. |
[9] | A. D. Lokhande, A. B. Gangadhara, J. A. Ansari, Characterizations of Prime and Minimal Prime Ideals of Hyperlattices, Int. J. Recent Innovation Trends Comput. Commun., 5(2017), 532-548. |
[10] | F. Marty, Sur une generalisation de la notion de groupe, 8th congres des Mathematiciens Scandinaves, (1934), 45-49. |
[11] | T. Muta, Foundations of quantum chromodynamics, Second edition, World Sci. Lect. Notes Phys., 57 (1998). |
[12] | P. He, X. Xin, J. Zhan, On rough hyperideals in hyperlattices, J. Appl. Math., (2013), Article ID 915217. |
[13] |
P. He, X. Xin, Fuzzy hyperlattices, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 4682-4690. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.059
![]() |
[14] |
D. Preethi, J. Vimala, B. Davvaz, S. Rajareega, Biological inheritance on fuzzy hyperlattice ordered group, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 38 (2020), 6457-6464. DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-179726. doi: 10.3233/JIFS-179726
![]() |
[15] | D. Preethi, J. Vimala, S. Rajareega, Some properties on fuzzy hyperlattice ordered group, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., 28 (2020), 124-132. |
[16] | S. Rajareega, J. Vimala, D. Preethi, Complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft lattice ordered group and its weighted distance measures, Mathematics, 8 (2020). |
[17] |
S. Rasouli, B. Davvaz, Lattices derived from hyperlattices, Commun. Algebra., 38 (2010), 2720-2737. doi: 10.1080/00927870903055230
![]() |
[18] |
S. Rasouli, B. Davvaz, Construction and spectral topology on hyperlattices, Mediterr. J. Math., 7 (2010), 249-262. doi: 10.1007/s00009-010-0065-9
![]() |
[19] |
M. K. Sen, R. Ameri, G. Chowdhury, Fuzzy hypersemigroups, Soft. Comput., 12 (2008), 891-900. doi: 10.1007/s00500-007-0257-9
![]() |
[20] | A. S. Lashkenari, B. Davvaz, Ordered Join Hyperlattices, U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A., 78 (2016). |
[21] | M. AI-Tahan, B. Davvaz, Fuzzy subsets of the phenotypes of F2-offspring, FACTA UNIVERSITATIS (NIS) Ser. Math. Inform., 34 (2016). |
[22] |
M. AI-Tahan, B. Davvaz, A new relationship between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and genetics, J. Classif. (Springer)., 36 (2019), 494-512. doi: 10.1007/s00357-018-9276-8
![]() |
[23] |
M. AI-Tahan, B. Davvaz, Algebraic hyperstructures associated to Biological inheritance, Math. Biosci., Elsevier., 285(2017), 112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2017.01.002
![]() |
[24] | M. AI-Tahan, B. Davvaz, n-ary hyperstructures associated to the genotypes of F2-offspring, Int. J. Biomath., 10 (2017). |
[25] | R. H. Tamarin, Principles of Genetics, 7Eds., The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2001. |
[26] | I. Tofan, A. C. Volf, On some connections between hyperstructures and fuzzy sets, Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math., 7 (2000), 63-68. |
[27] | J. Vimala, Fuzzy lattice ordered group, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 5 (2014). |
[28] |
Y. Q. Yin, J. M. Zhang, D. H. Xu, J. Y. Wang, The L-fuzzy hypermodules, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 953-963. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.09.012
![]() |
[29] |
L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control., 8 (1965), 338-353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
![]() |
1. | S. Rajareega, J. Vimala, D. Preethi, Complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft lattice ordered group associated with ℓ-ideal, 2022, 0972-0529, 1, 10.1080/09720529.2021.1962024 | |
2. | S. Rajareega, J. Vimala, Sabu M. Thampi, El-Sayed M. El-Alfy, Ljiljana Trajkovic, Operations on complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft lattice ordered group and CIFS-COPRAS method for equipment selection process, 2021, 41, 10641246, 5709, 10.3233/JIFS-189890 | |
3. | D. Preethi, J. Vimala, S. Rajareega, M. Al-Tahan, Sabu M. Thampi, El-Sayed M. El-Alfy, Ljiljana Trajkovic, Fuzzy hyperlattice ordered δ - group and its application on ABO blood group system, 2021, 41, 10641246, 5309, 10.3233/JIFS-189853 | |
4. | D. Preethi, J. Vimala, Sabu M. Thampi, El-Sayed M. El-Alfy, Ljiljana Trajkovic, Redox reaction on homomorphism of fuzzy hyperlattice ordered group, 2021, 41, 10641246, 5691, 10.3233/JIFS-189888 |
× | A | B | C | D |
A | A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D |
B | A, B, C, D | B, D | A, B, C, D | B, D |
C | A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D | C, D | C, D |
D | A, B, C, D | B, D | C, D | D |
× | P | Q | R | S |
P | P, Q, R, S | P, Q, R, S | P, Q, R, S | P, Q, R, S |
Q | P, Q, R, S | Q, S | P, Q, R, S | Q, S |
R | P, Q, R, S | P, Q, R, S | R, S | R, S |
S | P, Q, R, S | Q, S | R, S | S |