
Citation: Vediyappan Govindan, Inho Hwang, Choonkil Park. Hyers-Ulam stability of an n-variable quartic functional equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1452-1469. doi: 10.3934/math.2021089
[1] | Chien Chinh Vien, Tuan Van Le, Van Tuyet Thi Nguyen, Thang Nghia Hoang, Phila Nay . Viral load dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in the moderately symptomatic COVID-19 patients in Dak Lak, Viet Nam, 2021. AIMS Medical Science, 2025, 12(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2025001 |
[2] | Gasim Dobie, Sarah Abutalib, Wafa Sadifi, Mada Jahfali, Bayan Alghamdi, Asmaa Khormi, Taibah Alharbi, Munyah Zaqan, Zahra M Baalous, Abdulrahim R Hakami, Mohammed H Nahari, Abdullah A Mobarki, Muhammad Saboor, Mohammad S Akhter, Abdullah Hamadi, Denise E Jackson, Hassan A Hamali . The correlation between severe complications and blood group types in COVID-19 patients; with possible role of T polyagglutination in promoting thrombotic tendencies. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023001 |
[3] | Melissa R. Bowman Foster, Ali Atef Hijazi, Raymond C. Sullivan Jr, Rebecca Opoku . Hydroxyurea and pyridostigmine repurposed for treating Covid-19 multi-systems dysfunctions. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(2): 118-129. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023010 |
[4] | Valeria Paradies, Filippo Masi, Francesco Bartolomucci, Alfredo Marchese, Armando Liso, Fabrizio Resta, Stefano Favale, Martino Pepe . No Reflow-phenomenon: from Current State of the Art to Future Perspectives. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(4): 374-395. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.4.374 |
[5] | Marcus Martin, Reinand Thompson, Nikhil Tirupathi . Does vitamin D level have effect on COVID-19 outcomes?. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(2): 141-150. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023012 |
[6] | Elizabeth Burner, Lucy Liu, Sophie Terp, Sanjay Arora, Chun Nok Lam, Michael Menchine, Daniel A Dworkis, Sarah Axeen . Increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis in an Urban, United States, safety-net emergency department in the COVID-19 era. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(1): 37-45. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023004 |
[7] | Marco Ferrone, Anna Franzone, Bruno Trimarco, Giovanni Esposito, Plinio Cirillo . Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Patient with Acute Thrombosis of Saphenous Vein Graft and Patent Native Coronary Artery: Which is the Vessel to Approach?. AIMS Medical Science, 2015, 2(4): 310-315. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2015.4.310 |
[8] | Hossein Sheibani, Elham Azmoodeh, Amirhessam Kheirieh, Khadijeh Aerab Sheibani . COVID-19 and papular manifestations pattern in 3 patients: a retrospective case series. AIMS Medical Science, 2021, 8(1): 36-41. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2021004 |
[9] | Claudia Chaufan, Laurie Manwell, Camila Heredia, Jennifer McDonald . COVID-19 vaccines and autoimmune disorders: A scoping review protocol. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(4): 318-328. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023025 |
[10] | B Shivananda Nayak, Krishnamohan Surapaneni, Pradeep Kumar Sahu, Purnima Bhoi, K V N Dhananjay, Santhi Silambanan, C R Wilma Delphine Silvia, Dhanush Nayak, K Nagendra, M Balachandra Naidu, Akash S Nayak . The mental health of the health care professionals in India during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(2): 283-292. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022011 |
Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) might put patients at a risk of venous and arterial thrombosis [1]. A thrombus is a solid mass composed of platelets and fibrin with a few trapped red and white blood cells that forms within a blood vessel. Its formation is potentiated by either a hypercoagulable state or obstruction. SARS-CoV-2 uses angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor for entry into endothelial cells and replicates, which causes infiltration of inflammatory cells, endothelial cell death, and prothrombotic effects in the microvasculature. This may lead to systemic hypercoagulability and increased risk for thromboembolic events [2]. There are a number of studies highlighting the occurrence of thromboembolism in COVID-19 positive patients. However, these studies have reported varied findings. Therefore, this meta-analysis would help us analyze the prevalence of thromboembolic events in the hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
PubMed and SCOPUS were searched up till July 21, 2020 using the following keywords and their MeSH terms: “COVID-19”, “Thromboembolism”, “Pulmonary Embolism”, “Deep Venous Thrombosis”, “Stroke”, “Myocardial Infarction”. Two reviewers (SSA and AA) independently conducted the literature search. A third reviewer was consulted to resolve any conflict faced by the two authors. We included retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies on COVID-19 hospitalized patients that reported the incidence of thromboembolic events. Both genders were included and there was no age limit. We included studies that were published in English only. The studies that did not report the incidence of thromboembolic events and which were conducted in out of hospital patients were excluded. Initially, 571 potential studies were identified from the search strategy. PRISMA flow chart (Figure 1) summarizes our literature search [3]. After exclusions based on sequential screening of titles, abstracts, and full-texts, 20 studies (Table 1) were included. The outcomes of interest were presence of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). Outcomes were presented as proportions. Arcsine of square root proportions and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random effects model. P value <0.05 was considered significant.
The analysis includes 20 studies (Table 1) with a total of 15,452 patients [4]–[23]. The incidence of venous thromboembolism was found to be greater than arterial thromboembolism. Amongst the studied thromboembolic events, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PP: 12.4% [7.2%, 18.6%]; I2 = 97.23%) was the highest. It was followed by deep vein thrombosis (PP: 8.6% [4.2%, 14.3%]; I2 = 97.52%), myocardial infarction (PP: 2.3% [0.2%, 11.2%]; I2 = 99.3%), and stroke (PP: 1.2% [0.8%, 1.6%]; I2 = 65.09%), (Table 2 and Figue 2, 3, 4, and 5). The Forest plots (Figure 6) show the combined incidence of arterial thromboembolism including MI and stroke (PP: 2.5% [0.2%, 0.7%]; I2 = 98.91%). Figure 7 shows Forest plots of venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis (PP: 15.8% [10.0%, 22.6%]; I2 = 98.21%).
Author | Country | Study type | Outcomes reported | Sample size | Age | Sex (%) |
|
Male | Female | ||||||
Klok et al. [11] | Netherlands | Cross-sectional | Stroke, DVT, PE | 184 | 64 | 76 | 24 |
Lodigiani et al. [13] | Italy | Retrospective | Stroke, MI, DVT, PE | 388 | 66 (55–85) | 68 | 32 |
Angeli et al. [4] | Italy | Cross-sectional | PE | 50 | 64 | 72 | 28 |
Demelo-Rodríguez et al. [8] | Spain | Prospective | DVT | 156 | 68.1 ± 14.5 | 65.4 | 34.6 |
Helms et al. [9] | France | Prospective | Stroke, DVT, PE | 150 | 63 (53–71) | 81.3 | 18.7 |
Llitjos et al. [12] | France | Retrospective | DVT, PE | 26 | 68 (51.5–74.5) | 77 | 23 |
Middledorp et al. [14] | Netherlands | Retrospective | DVT, PE | 198 | 61 | 65.7 | 34.3 |
Jain et al. [10] | United States | Retrospective | Stroke | 3218 | 64 | 60.7 | 39.3 |
Pyoiadji et al. [15] | United States | Retrospective | PE | 328 | 61.3 | 45.9 | 54.1 |
Bompard et al. [6] | France | Retrospective | PE | 135 | 64 | 69.6 | 30.4 |
Cantador et al. [7] | Spain | Retrospective | Stroke, MI, DVT | 1419 | 69 | 78.6 | 21.4 |
Zhang et al. [17] | China | Cross Sectional | DVT | 143 | 63 | 51.7 | 48.3 |
Yaghi et al. [16] | United States | Retrospective | Stroke | 3556 | 62.5 | 71.9 | 28.1 |
Bilaloglu et al. [5] | United States | Cross-sectional | Stroke, MI, DVT | 3334 | 64 (51–75) | 60.4 | 39.6 |
Bi et al. [18] | China | Prospective | DVT | 420 | 45 | 47.6 | 52.4 |
Cui et al. [19] | China | Retrospective | DVT | 81 | 59.9 | 46 | 54 |
Grillet et al. [20] | France | Retrospective | PE | 100 | 66 ± 13 | 70 | 30 |
Li et al. [22] | USA | Retrospective | PE | 1453 | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Léonard-Lorant et al. [21] | France | Retrospective | PE | 106 | N/R | 56.6 | 34.4 |
Poissy et al. [23] | France | Cross-sectional | DVT, PE | 107 | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Variable | Number of patients affected | Total number of patients | Pooled percentage % (95% CI, %) | Heterogeneity |
Stroke | 143 | 12249 | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | 65.09 |
MI | 305 | 5141 | 2.3 (0.2–11.2) | 99.3 |
DVT | 278 | 6606 | 8.6 (4.2–14.3) | 97.52 |
PE | 379 | 6559 | 12.4 (7.2–18.6) | 97.23 |
The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that pulmonary embolism is the most prevalent thromboembolic event in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. This finding concurs with that of prior studies, such as that by Al-Ani et al. where they reported a high frequency of PE, along with an overall venous thromboembolism (VTE) frequency of 20% of patients, and of stroke 3% [24]. Klok et al., which was an analysis of incidence of thromboembolic events in critically ill COVID19 patients in three Dutch hospitals, reported a cumulative incidence of 31%, with the highest being that of PE [25]. This high prevalence of PE can be attributed to the hypoxia induced coagulation leading to an in-situ thrombosis [24]. In contrast, studies on hospitalized patients without COVID-19 have generally shown a lower incidence of VTE. A study on VTE (reporting DVT and PE) risk stratification in patients without COVID-19 reported a low incidence of 0.3% of VTE development during hospital admissions [26]. Another study reported the trends in the incidence of PE and DVT in hospitalized patients over the course of 20 years. The incidence in DVT amplified from 0.8% to 1.3% of admissions while the incidence of PE was 0.4% and remained constant [27]. This suggests that the virus may increase the risk of thrombosis. However, further investigation is needed to confirm this. Post-mortem findings in COVID-19 patients have shown evidence of subclinical thromboembolism, mainly in the pulmonary vasculature [28]. DVT thromboprophylaxis is recommended in all hospitalized patients but the guidelines for prophylaxis in COVOD-19 are heterogenous [24]. In COVID-19 patients with severe disease and elevated D-dimer levels, heparin use was found to decrease mortality. This benefit was not seen in non-COVID pneumonia patients admitted to intensive care unit [29]. Apart from PE, COVID-19 can also be complicated by DVT, MI and stroke as the continued inflammatory response to COVID-19 with cytokine overproduction, raised D-dimer levels and fibrin degradation products leads to a prothrombotic state [30]. Increased risk of myocardial infarction is also seen in influenza and other virus illness [31]. Myocardial infarction can also be the first presenting feature of COVID-19 [32]. A rise in catecholamines due to the systemic inflammation in COVID-19 can cause plaque disruption and acute myocardial infarction [33]. Myocardial infarction due to COVID-19 can also occur in the absence of a culprit lesion in the coronary artery [32]. Compared with other anticoagulation medicines, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with better prognosis in COVID-19 patients [33]. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) can be considered in patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome who are on mechanical ventilation [33]. Rapid rising data on varied neurological symptoms associated with Covid-19 individuals emphasizes more on the risk of thrombotic vascular events associated with this disease course. A rapid review on Covid-19 related stroke in young individuals reported that SARS-CoV-2 is more likely to cause stroke than the other coronavirus and seasonal infectious diseases [34]. In fact, a 7.5-fold increased rate of cerebrovascular events is documented in nearly 1.5% covid-19 hospitalizations than in patients with influenza [35].
Due to the lack of sufficient data, we were unable to analyze the impact of baseline factors such as age and sex on our results. This meta-analysis included COVID-19 hospitalized patients and does not represent all the patients with COVID-19, including asymptomatic carriers and patients who are treated at home. The studies are heterogenous and include studies with self-reported outcomes which increases the risk of bias. Due to difference in pathophysiology, prophylaxis and treatment of arterial and venous thrombotic complications, more studies are required to fill the gap in this area. The impact of treatment and drugs administered on these outcomes was not taken into account in this analysis.
Based on the results of our meta-analysis, thromboembolism may prove to be a significant factor in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. These complications should be anticipated in patients with COVID-19 and effective treatment should be given. Use of thromboprophylaxis should be considered to reduce the risk of thromboembolism [25]. Future studies should focus on establishing a link between the severity of COVID-19 infection and its thromboembolic complications. Serum markers should be identified which relate to increased risk of thromboembolic complications and worse prognosis. The dose and mode of thromboprophylaxis should also be studied to improve outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
[1] | H. Azadi Kenary, RNS-Approximately nonlinear additive functional equations, J. Math. Extension, 6 (2012), 11-20. |
[2] | P. W. Cholewa, Remarks on the stability of functional equations, Aequationes Math., 27 (1984), 76-86. |
[3] | R. Chugh, Ashish, On the stability of functional equations in random normed spaces, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 45 (2012), 25-34. |
[4] |
S. Czerwik, On the stability of the quadratic mapping in normed spaces, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg, 62 (1992), 59-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02941618
![]() |
[5] | M. E. Gordji, J. M. Rassias, M. B. Savadkouhi, Approximation of the quadratic and cubic functional equation in RN-spaces, Eur. J. Pure. Appl. Math., 2 (2009), 494-507. |
[6] |
V. Govindan, C. Park, S. Pinelas, S. Baskaran, Solution of a 3-D cubic functional equation and its stability, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2020), 1693-1705. doi: 10.3934/math.2020114
![]() |
[7] |
D. H. Hyers, On the stability of the linear functional equation, P. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 27 (1941), 222-224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.27.4.222
![]() |
[8] |
D. H. Hyers, Th. M. Rassias, Approximate homomorphisms, Aequationes Math., 44 (1992), 125- 153. doi: 10.1007/BF01830975
![]() |
[9] |
S. Jin, Y. Lee, On the stability of the functional equation deriving from quadratic and additive function in random normed spaces via fixed point method, J. Chungcheong Math. Soc., 25 (2012), 51-63. doi: 10.14403/jcms.2012.25.1.051
![]() |
[10] | K. Jun, Y. Lee, On the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of a pexiderized quadratic inequality, Math. Inequal. Appl., 4 (2001), 93-118. |
[11] |
S. Jung, On the Hyers-Ulam stability of the functional equations that have the quadratic property, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 222 (1998), 126-137. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1998.5916
![]() |
[12] |
S. Jung, On the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of a quadratic functional equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 232 (1999), 384-393. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6282
![]() |
[13] | S. Jung, D. Popa, M. Th. Rassias, On the stability of the linear functional equation in a single variable on complete metric spaces, J. Global Optim., 59 (2014), 13-16. |
[14] | Pl. Kannappan, Quadratic functional equation and inner product spaces, Results Math., 27 (1995), 368-372. |
[15] | R. Lather, K. Dhingra, Stability of quartic functional equation in random 2-normed spaces, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 147 (2016), 39-42. |
[16] | J. Lee, C. Park, S. Pinelas, V. Govindan, K. Tamilvanan, G. Kokila, Stability of a sexvigintic functional equation, Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl., 24 (2019), 293-325. |
[17] | Y. Lee, S. Jung, M. Th. Rassias, Uniqueness theorems on functional inequalities concerning cubicquadratic-additive equation, J. Math. Inequal., 12 (2018), 43-61. |
[18] |
D. Mihet, V. Radu, On the stability of the additive Cauchy functional equation in random normed spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 343 (2008), 567-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.100
![]() |
[19] | D. Mihet, R. Saadati, S. M. Vaezpour, The stability of the quartic functional equation in random normed space, Acta. Appl. Math., 110 (2010), 799-803. |
[20] |
A. Najati, M. Moghimi, Stability of a functional equation deriving from quadratic and additive functions in quasi-Banach spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 337 (2008), 399-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.104
![]() |
[21] |
J. M. Rassias, R. Saadati, G. Sadeghi, J. Vahidi, On nonlinear stability in various random normed spaces, J. Inequal. Appl., 2011 (2011), 62. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2011-62
![]() |
[22] |
Th. M. Rassias, On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces, P. Am. Math. Soc., 72 (1978), 297-300. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507327-1
![]() |
[23] | R. Saadati, S. M. Vaezpour, Y. Cho, A note to paper "On the stability of cubic mappings and quartic mappings in random normed spaces", J. Inequal. Appl., 2009 (2009), 214530. |
[24] |
F. Skof, Proprietè locali e approssimazione di operatori, Rend. Sem. Mat. Fis. Milano, 53 (1983), 113-129. doi: 10.1007/BF02924890
![]() |
[25] | S. M. Ulam, Problems in modern mathematics, New York: Wiley, 1964. |
[26] |
J. Vanterler da C. Sousa, E. C. de Oliveira, F. G. Rodrigues, Ulam-Hyers stabilities of fractional functional differential equations, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2020), 1346-1358. doi: 10.3934/math.2020092
![]() |
[27] |
T. Z. Xu, J. M. Rassias, W. X. Xu, On stability of a general mixed additive-cubic functional equation in random normed spaces, J. Inequl. Appl., 2010 (2010), 328473. doi: 10.1155/2010/328473
![]() |
[28] |
S. Zhang, J. M. Rassias, R. Saadati, Stability of a cubic functional equation in intuitionistic random normed spaces, Appl. Math. Mech. Engl. Ed., 31 (2010), 21-26. doi: 10.1007/s10483-010-0103-6
![]() |
Author | Country | Study type | Outcomes reported | Sample size | Age | Sex (%) |
|
Male | Female | ||||||
Klok et al. [11] | Netherlands | Cross-sectional | Stroke, DVT, PE | 184 | 64 | 76 | 24 |
Lodigiani et al. [13] | Italy | Retrospective | Stroke, MI, DVT, PE | 388 | 66 (55–85) | 68 | 32 |
Angeli et al. [4] | Italy | Cross-sectional | PE | 50 | 64 | 72 | 28 |
Demelo-Rodríguez et al. [8] | Spain | Prospective | DVT | 156 | 68.1 ± 14.5 | 65.4 | 34.6 |
Helms et al. [9] | France | Prospective | Stroke, DVT, PE | 150 | 63 (53–71) | 81.3 | 18.7 |
Llitjos et al. [12] | France | Retrospective | DVT, PE | 26 | 68 (51.5–74.5) | 77 | 23 |
Middledorp et al. [14] | Netherlands | Retrospective | DVT, PE | 198 | 61 | 65.7 | 34.3 |
Jain et al. [10] | United States | Retrospective | Stroke | 3218 | 64 | 60.7 | 39.3 |
Pyoiadji et al. [15] | United States | Retrospective | PE | 328 | 61.3 | 45.9 | 54.1 |
Bompard et al. [6] | France | Retrospective | PE | 135 | 64 | 69.6 | 30.4 |
Cantador et al. [7] | Spain | Retrospective | Stroke, MI, DVT | 1419 | 69 | 78.6 | 21.4 |
Zhang et al. [17] | China | Cross Sectional | DVT | 143 | 63 | 51.7 | 48.3 |
Yaghi et al. [16] | United States | Retrospective | Stroke | 3556 | 62.5 | 71.9 | 28.1 |
Bilaloglu et al. [5] | United States | Cross-sectional | Stroke, MI, DVT | 3334 | 64 (51–75) | 60.4 | 39.6 |
Bi et al. [18] | China | Prospective | DVT | 420 | 45 | 47.6 | 52.4 |
Cui et al. [19] | China | Retrospective | DVT | 81 | 59.9 | 46 | 54 |
Grillet et al. [20] | France | Retrospective | PE | 100 | 66 ± 13 | 70 | 30 |
Li et al. [22] | USA | Retrospective | PE | 1453 | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Léonard-Lorant et al. [21] | France | Retrospective | PE | 106 | N/R | 56.6 | 34.4 |
Poissy et al. [23] | France | Cross-sectional | DVT, PE | 107 | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Variable | Number of patients affected | Total number of patients | Pooled percentage % (95% CI, %) | Heterogeneity |
Stroke | 143 | 12249 | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | 65.09 |
MI | 305 | 5141 | 2.3 (0.2–11.2) | 99.3 |
DVT | 278 | 6606 | 8.6 (4.2–14.3) | 97.52 |
PE | 379 | 6559 | 12.4 (7.2–18.6) | 97.23 |
Author | Country | Study type | Outcomes reported | Sample size | Age | Sex (%) |
|
Male | Female | ||||||
Klok et al. [11] | Netherlands | Cross-sectional | Stroke, DVT, PE | 184 | 64 | 76 | 24 |
Lodigiani et al. [13] | Italy | Retrospective | Stroke, MI, DVT, PE | 388 | 66 (55–85) | 68 | 32 |
Angeli et al. [4] | Italy | Cross-sectional | PE | 50 | 64 | 72 | 28 |
Demelo-Rodríguez et al. [8] | Spain | Prospective | DVT | 156 | 68.1 ± 14.5 | 65.4 | 34.6 |
Helms et al. [9] | France | Prospective | Stroke, DVT, PE | 150 | 63 (53–71) | 81.3 | 18.7 |
Llitjos et al. [12] | France | Retrospective | DVT, PE | 26 | 68 (51.5–74.5) | 77 | 23 |
Middledorp et al. [14] | Netherlands | Retrospective | DVT, PE | 198 | 61 | 65.7 | 34.3 |
Jain et al. [10] | United States | Retrospective | Stroke | 3218 | 64 | 60.7 | 39.3 |
Pyoiadji et al. [15] | United States | Retrospective | PE | 328 | 61.3 | 45.9 | 54.1 |
Bompard et al. [6] | France | Retrospective | PE | 135 | 64 | 69.6 | 30.4 |
Cantador et al. [7] | Spain | Retrospective | Stroke, MI, DVT | 1419 | 69 | 78.6 | 21.4 |
Zhang et al. [17] | China | Cross Sectional | DVT | 143 | 63 | 51.7 | 48.3 |
Yaghi et al. [16] | United States | Retrospective | Stroke | 3556 | 62.5 | 71.9 | 28.1 |
Bilaloglu et al. [5] | United States | Cross-sectional | Stroke, MI, DVT | 3334 | 64 (51–75) | 60.4 | 39.6 |
Bi et al. [18] | China | Prospective | DVT | 420 | 45 | 47.6 | 52.4 |
Cui et al. [19] | China | Retrospective | DVT | 81 | 59.9 | 46 | 54 |
Grillet et al. [20] | France | Retrospective | PE | 100 | 66 ± 13 | 70 | 30 |
Li et al. [22] | USA | Retrospective | PE | 1453 | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Léonard-Lorant et al. [21] | France | Retrospective | PE | 106 | N/R | 56.6 | 34.4 |
Poissy et al. [23] | France | Cross-sectional | DVT, PE | 107 | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Variable | Number of patients affected | Total number of patients | Pooled percentage % (95% CI, %) | Heterogeneity |
Stroke | 143 | 12249 | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | 65.09 |
MI | 305 | 5141 | 2.3 (0.2–11.2) | 99.3 |
DVT | 278 | 6606 | 8.6 (4.2–14.3) | 97.52 |
PE | 379 | 6559 | 12.4 (7.2–18.6) | 97.23 |