Citation: Wen Guan, Da-Bin Wang, Xinan Hao. Infinitely many solutions for a class of biharmonic equations with indefinite potentials[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3634-3645. doi: 10.3934/math.2020235
[1] | K. Kefi, Jian Liu . Triple solutions for a Leray-Lions $ p(x) $-biharmonic operator involving Hardy potential and indefinite weight. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22697-22711. doi: 10.3934/math.20241106 |
[2] | Wei Guo, Jinfu Yang, Jiafeng Zhang . Existence results of nontrivial solutions for a new $ p(x) $-biharmonic problem with weight function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8491-8509. doi: 10.3934/math.2022473 |
[3] | Abdeljabbar Ghanmi, Abdelhakim Sahbani . Existence results for $ p(x) $-biharmonic problems involving a singular and a Hardy type nonlinearities. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29892-29909. doi: 10.3934/math.20231528 |
[4] | Khaled Kefi, Abdeljabbar Ghanmi, Abdelhakim Sahbani, Mohammed M. Al-Shomrani . Infinitely many solutions for a critical $ p(x) $-Kirchhoff equation with Steklov boundary value. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28361-28378. doi: 10.3934/math.20241376 |
[5] | Najla Alghamdi, Abdeljabbar Ghanmi . Multiple solutions for a singular fractional Kirchhoff problem with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 826-838. doi: 10.3934/math.2025039 |
[6] | Xiaojie Guo, Zhiqing Han . Existence of solutions to a generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equation with concave-convex nonlinearities and potentials vanishing at infinity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27684-27711. doi: 10.3934/math.20231417 |
[7] | Famei Zheng . Periodic wave solutions of a non-Newtonian filtration equation with an indefinite singularity. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1209-1222. doi: 10.3934/math.2021074 |
[8] | Yuhua Long . Existence and nonexistence of positive solutions to a class of nonlocal discrete Kirchhoff type equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24568-24589. doi: 10.3934/math.20231253 |
[9] | Qian Li, Qianqian Yuan, Jianhua Chen . An efficient relaxed shift-splitting preconditioner for a class of complex symmetric indefinite linear systems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17123-17132. doi: 10.3934/math.2022942 |
[10] | Dengfeng Lu, Shuwei Dai . On existence results for a class of biharmonic elliptic problems without (AR) condition. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18897-18909. doi: 10.3934/math.2024919 |
In this paper, we consider the following sublinear biharmonic equations
Δ2u+V(x)u=K(x)|u|p−1u, x∈RN, | (1.1) |
where N≥5,0<p<1, V(x),K(x)∈L∞(RN) both change sign in RN and satisfies some conditions specified below. Problem (1.1) involved biharmonic operator arises in the study of traveling waves in suspension bridge. Furthermore, it is well know that biharmonic operator arises in the study of static deflection of a plate, for more details, we refer the read to [1,2,3].
For biharmonic equations, there have been many results [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] and the references therein. In these results, some authors studied biharmonic equations on the whole space RN [4,6,9,10,12,14,15,16,17,19,20,21], in which most of them were focused on superlinear case but few results involving sublinear case [10,15,16,20,21]. On the other hand, we notice that, in [4,19], authors considered the biharmonic equations under sign-changing potential and superlinear case. However, to our best knowledge, there are no results of biharmonic equations on RN in case of sign-changing potential and sublinear case. In this paper, we will investigate the nontrivial solutions for Eq 1.1 with the potential indefinite in sign and sublinear case, the tool used in our paper is the symmetric Mountain Pass Theorem.
To stated our main result, we assume that:
(H1) V∈L∞(RN) and there exist α,R0>0 such that
V(x)≥α,for any|x|≥R0. |
(H2) ‖V−‖N4<1S, where V±(x)=max{±V(x),0} and the S is the constant of Sobolev:
‖u‖22∗≤S‖Δu‖22,for anyu∈H2(RN),where2∗=2NN−4. |
(H3) K∈L∞(RN) and there exist β>0,R1>R2>0, y0=(y1,...,yN)∈RN such that
K(x)≤−β,for any|x|>R1;K(x)>0,for anyx∈B(y0,R2). |
Our main result is as follows:
Theorem 1.1. Assume (H1)−(H3) hold. Then problem (1.1) possesses infinitely many nontrivial solutions.
For biharmonic equations on the whole space RN, the main difficulty one may face is the Sobolev embedding H2(RN)↪Ls(R) is not compact for s∈[2,2∗). To overcome this difficulty, one can restrict the corresponding energy functional to a subspace of H2(RN), which embeds compactly into Ls(RN) with certain qualifications or consisting of radially symmetric functions. For example, Yin and Wu [17] and Ye and Tang [15] considered biharmonic equations with the potential V satisfying following conditions:
(V1) V∈C(RN,R),infx∈RNV(x)≥b>0and for eachM>0,meas{x∈RN:V(x)≤M}<∞, where b is a constant and meas denotes Lebesgue measure in RN.
In fact, due to the condition (V1), space
X={u∈H2(RN):∫RN|Δu|2+|∇u|2+V(x)u2dx<+∞} |
can embed compactly into Ls(RN) for s∈[2,2∗), which is crucial in their paper.
Subsequently, Liu, Chen and Wu [6] and Ye and Tang [16] studied biharmonic equations with λV instead of potential V under more weaker condition than (V1), i.e.,
(V2) V∈C(RN,R),infx∈RNV(x)≥b>0there existsM>0,meas{x∈RN:V(x)≤M}<∞, where b is a constant and meas denotes Lebesgue measure in RN.
Under the condition (V2), it is obvious that V(x) no longer satisfies certain coercive condition. Hence, corresponding Sobolev's embedding is not compact. Fortunately, with the aid of parameter λ (λ>0 large enough), they obtained that the corresponding energy functional possess the property of locally compact.
In [20,21], Zhang, Tang and Zhang considered biharmonic equations on RN under more weaken conditions than (V1) and (V2). However, their results does not allow V(x) to change sign.
Recently, Su and Chen [10] studied the following sublinear biharmonic equation
{Δ2u−Δu+λV(x)u=α(x)f(u)+μK(x)|u|q−2u, x∈RN,u∈H2(RN), |
where N>4,λ>0,1<q<2 and μ∈[0,μ0]. By using Ekeland's variational principle and Gigliardo-Nirenberg's inequality, they proved the existence of nontrivial solution for the above problem. It is noticed that their results require conditions V(x)≥0 and K(x)>0.
However, in this paper, the condition like type (V1) or (V2) does not be needed. Furthermore, functions V(x) and K(x) both change sign in RN. So, the conditions in this paper more weaken than that of in [6,10,15,16,17,20,21]. On the other hand, our main result also supplement the results obtained by [4,19] in which the sign-changing potential and superlinear case were considered. It is worth pointing out that there are some interesting results, for example [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], considered elliptic equations with an indefinite nonlinearity or sublinear condition or nonlocal terms.
In this paper, we use the following notations. Let
‖u‖q=(∫RN|u|qdx)1q,1≤q<+∞. |
Let E be a Banach space and φ:E→R be a functional of class C1, the Fréchet derivative of φ at u, φ′(u), is an element of the dual space E∗ and we denote φ′(u) evaluated at v∈E by ⟨φ′(u),v⟩.
The Sobolev space E=H2(RN)∩Lp+1(RN),0<p<1, endowed with the norm by
‖u‖=‖Δu‖2+‖u‖p+1. |
Obviously, the space E is a reflexive Banach space.
The energy functional φ:E→R corresponding to problem (1.1) is defined by
φ(u)=12∫RN|Δu|2dx+12∫RNV(x)u2dx−1p+1∫RNK(x)|u|p+1dx. |
It is well know that, under our conditions, φ∈C1(E) and its critical points are solutions of problem (1.1).
Definition 2.1. ([37]) Let E be a Banach space and A a subset of E. Set A is said to be symmetric if u∈E implies −u∈E. For a closed symmetric set A which does not contain the origin, we define a genus γ(A) of A by the smallest integer l such that there exist an odd continuous mapping from A to Rl∖{0}. If there does not exists such a l, we define γ(A)=∞. We set γ(∅)=0. Let Γl denote the family of closed symmetric subsets A of E such that 0∉A and γ(A)≥l.
The following result is a version of the classical symmetric Mountain Pass Theorem [37,38]. A proof can be found in [39].
Theorem 2.1. ([39]) Let E be an infinite dimensional Banach space and let φ∈C1(E,R) satisfy:
(1) φ is even, bounded from below, φ(0)=0 and φ satisfies the Palais-Smale condition.
(2) For each l∈N, there exists an Al∈Γl such that
supu∈Alφ(u)<0. |
Then either of the following two conditions holds:
(i) There exists a sequence ul such that φ′(ul)=0,φ(ul)<0 and ul converges to zero; or
(ii) There exist two sequences ul and vl such that φ′(ul)=0,φ(ul)=0,ul≠0, liml→+∞ul=0,φ′(vl)=0,φ(vl)<0,liml→+∞φ(vl)=0 and vl converges to a non-zero limit.
Lemma 3.1. If (H1)−(H3) hold. Then any PS sequence of φ is bounded in E.
Proof. Let {un}⊂E be such that
φ(un)is bounded and φ′(un)→0 asn→∞. |
That is, there exists C>0 such that φ(un)≤C. Then, according to (H3), Hölder inequality and Sobolev embedding, one has that
C≥φ(un)=12∫RN|Δun|2dx+12∫RNV(x)u2ndx−1p+1∫RNK(x)|un|p+1dx≥12∫RN|Δun|2dx−12∫RNV−(x)u2ndx−1p+1∫RNK+(x)|un|p+1dx≥12∫RN|Δun|2dx−12(∫RN|V−|N4dx)4N(∫RN(|un|2)2∗2dx)22∗−1p+1∫RNK+(x)|un|p+1dx≥(12−S‖V−‖N42)‖Δun‖22−Sp+12p+1‖K+‖2∗2∗−(p+1)‖Δun‖p+12. |
So, thanks to 0<p<1, there exists η>0 such that
‖Δun‖2≤η,for anyn∈N. | (3.1) |
On the other hand, one has that
C+‖un‖2≥φ(un)−12⟨φ′(un),un⟩≥(12−1p+1)∫RNK(x)|un|p+1dx=(12−1p+1)∫RNK+(x)|un|p+1dx+(1p+1−12)∫RNK−(x)|un|p+1dx=(12−1p+1)∫RN(K+(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))|un|p+1dx+(1p+1−12)∫RN(K−(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))|un|p+1dx. |
By (H3), we have that
K+(x)=0,for all|x|>R1. |
Then, thanks to K∈L∞(RN), we have that
∫RN|K+(x)+χB(0,R1)(x)|2∗2∗−(p+1)dx=∫B(0,R1)|K+(x)+χB(0,R1)(x)|2∗2∗−(p+1)dx<∞. |
So, by Hölder inequality and Soblev inequality, we have that
∫RN(K+(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))|un|p+1dx≤(∫RN(K+(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))2∗2∗−(p+1)dx)2∗−(p+1)2∗×(∫RN(|un|p+1)2∗p+1dx)p+12∗≤Sp+12‖K++χB(0,R1)‖2∗2∗−(p+1)‖Δun‖p+12. | (3.2) |
By (H3) again, we know that K−(x)≥β, for all |x|>R1. Then, we have that
∫RN(K−(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))|vn|p+1dx≥min(β,1)‖vn‖p+1p+1. | (3.3) |
Thanks to (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3), there is a constant C1>0 such that
‖un‖p+1p+1≤C1+C1‖un‖p+1for alln∈N. |
Since 0<p<1, {un} is bounded in Lp+1(RN).
Then, from (3.1), we conclude that {un} is bounded in E.
Lemma 3.2. ([40]) Let x,y be for all real numbers, there exists a constant c>0 such that
||x+y|p+1−|x|p+1−|y|p+1|≤c|x|p|y|. |
Lemma 3.3. If (H1)−(H3) hold, then φ satisfies the PS condition on E.
Proof. Let {un}⊂E be such that
φ(un)is bounded and φ′(un)→0 asn→∞. |
According to Lemma 3.1, {un} is bounded in E. Passing to a subsequence in necessary, we can assume that
un⇀uinE, |
un→uinLqloc(RN),2≤q<2∗, |
un→u,a.e RN. |
So, for any h∈C∞0(RN), one has that
∫RNΔunΔh+V(x)unhdx→∫RNΔuΔh+V(x)uhdx. |
On the other hand, by Sobolev embedding and Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, one has that
∫RNK(x)|un|p−1unh(x)dx→∫RNK(x)|u|p−1uh(x)dx. |
Therefore, according to above facts, one has that
0=limn→+∞⟨φ′(un),h⟩=⟨φ′(u),h⟩,for anyh∈C∞0(RN). |
Hence, we have that
⟨φ′(u),u⟩=0. |
Let vn=un−u, then un=vn+u, and we have that
⟨φ′(un),un⟩=∫RN(|Δun|2+V(x)u2n)dx−∫RNK(x)|un|p+1dx=∫RN(|Δvn|2+|Δu|2+2ΔvnΔu+V(x)v2n+V(x)u2+2V(x)vnu)dx−∫RNK(x)|un|p+1dx+∫RNK(x)|u|p+1dx−∫RNK(x)|u|p+1dx=⟨φ′(u),u⟩+∫RN|Δvn|2dx+∫RNV(x)v2ndx−∫RNK(x)|un|p+1dx+∫RNK(x)|u|p+1dx+on(1)≥∫RN|Δvn|2dx−∫RNV−(x)v2ndx−∫RNK(x)(|un|p+1−|u|p+1)dx+on(1). |
By Lemma 3.2, we have that
|K(x)|||un|p+1−|u|p+1−|vn|p+1|=|K(x)|||vn+u|p+1−|u|p+1−|vn|p+1|≤c|K(x)||u|p|vn|. | (3.4) |
We claim that
∫RN|K(x)||u|p|vn|dx≤C∫RN|u|p|vn|dx→0, | (3.5) |
as n→+∞.
In fact, because E↪Lp+1(RN) is continuous and vn⇀0 in E, we obtain that vn⇀0 in Lp+1(RN). On the other hand, it is obvious that |u|p∈Lp+1p(RN). So, by K∈L∞(RN) and definition of weakly convergence in space Lp+1(RN), we have that
∫RN|K(x)||u|p|vn|dx≤C∫RN|u|p|vn|dx→0, |
as n→+∞.
Hence, according to (3.4) and (3.5), we have that
limn→+∞∫RNK(x)[|un|p+1−|u|p+1]dx=limn→+∞∫RNK(x)|vn|p+1dx. |
Then, we obtain that
⟨φ′(un),un⟩≥⟨φ′(u),u⟩+∫RN|Δvn|2dx−∫RNV−(x)v2ndx−∫RNK(x)|vn|p+1dx+on(1)=∫RN|Δvn|2dx−∫RNV−(x)v2ndx−∫RN(K+(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))|vn|p+1dx+∫RN(K−(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))|vn|p+1dx+on(1). | (3.6) |
Claim 1: ∫RNV−(x)v2ndx→0 as n→+∞.
In fact, by (H1), we have that V−(x)=0, for all |x|≥R0. So, from vn→0inLqloc(RN),2≤q<2∗, and V∈L∞(RN), we obtain ∫RNV−(x)v2ndx→0 as n→+∞.
Claim 2: ∫RN(K+(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))|vn|p+1dx→0 as n→+∞.
In fact, by (H3), we have that K+(x)=0, for all |x|>R1. Thanks to K∈L∞(RN) and vn→0inLqloc(RN),2≤q<2∗, we get
∫RN(K+(x)+χB(0,R1)(x))|vn|p+1dx→0 |
as n→+∞.
Combining claim 1, claim 2, (3.3) and (3.6), we obtain that
0=limn→+∞(‖Δvn‖22+min(β,1)‖vn‖p+1p+1). |
That is, vn→0 in E. The proof is complete.
The proof of following Lemma is based on some ideas of Kajikiya [39] and very similar to the one contained in [40]. For reader convenient, we give the proof.
Lemma 3.4. If (H1)−(H3) hold, then for each l∈N, there exists subset Al∈Γl such that,
supu∈AlI(u)<0. |
Proof. For R2 and y0 given by (H3), let
B(R2)={(x1,⋯,xn)∈RN:|xi−yi|<R2,1≤i≤N}. |
Let l∈N be an arbitrary number and define n=min{n∈N:nN≥l}. By planes parallel to each face of B(R2), B(R2) be equally divided into nN small partes Bi with 1≤i≤nN. In fact, the length a of the edge Bi is R2n. Let Fi⊂Bi be new cubes such that Fi has the same center as that of Bi. The faces of Fi and Bi are parallel, and the length of the edge of Fi is a2. Let ϕi∈C(RN), 1≤i≤l, satisfy: supp(ϕi)⊂Bi; supp(ϕi)∩supp(ϕj)=∅(i≠j); ϕi(x)=1 for x∈Fi; 0≤ϕi(x)≤1, for all x∈RN. Let
Sl−1={(t1,⋯,tl)∈Rl:max1≤i≤l|ti|=1}, | (3.7) |
Wl={l∑i=1tiϕi(x):(t1,⋯tl)∈Sl−1}⊂E. |
According to the fact that the mapping (t1,⋯,tl)→∑li=1tiϕi from Sl−1 to Wl is odd and homeomorphic, so γ(Wl)=γ(Sl−1)=l. Since Wl is compact in E, it follows that there exists αl>0 such that
‖u‖2≤αl,for anyu∈Wl. |
On the other hand, we claim that
‖u‖2≤C‖Δu‖s2‖u‖1−sp+1≤C‖u‖, |
where s=2∗(1−p)2(2∗−p−1).
First, we prove that ‖u‖2∗≤C‖Δu‖2,∀u∈E.
In fact, ∀u∈E, u∈H2(RN), so u,∇u∈H1(RN). Then, by Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality (since C∞0(RN) is dense in H1(RN)), we have
‖∇u‖2∗≤C1‖Δu‖2 |
where 2∗=2NN−2 and C1 depending only on N.
Since 2<2∗<N, by using Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality again, we have
‖u‖2∗=‖u‖(2∗)∗≤C2‖∇u‖2∗, |
where C2 depending on N.
Next, since 1<p+1<2<2∗, by interpolation inequality, we have
‖u‖2≤‖u‖s2∗‖u‖1−sp+1, |
where 12=s2∗+1−sp+1 (thai is s=2∗(1−p)2(2∗−p−1)).
So ‖u‖2≤C‖Δu‖s2‖u‖1−sp+1≤C‖u‖.
According to above facts, there exists cl>0 such that
‖u‖22≤clfor allu∈Wl. |
Let t>0 and v=∑l=1tiϕi(x)∈Wl,
φ(tv)=t22∫RN(|Δv|2+V(x)v2)dx−1p+1l∑i=1∫BiK(x)|ttiϕi|p+1dx≤t22αl+t22‖V‖∞cl−1p+1l∑i=1∫BiK(x)|ttiϕi|p+1dx. | (3.8) |
From (3.2), there exists j∈[1,l] such that |tj|=1 and |ti|≤1 for i≠j. So
l∑i=1∫BiK(x)|ttiϕi|p+1dx=∫FjK(x)|ttjϕj|p+1dx+∫Bj∖FjK(x)|ttjϕj(x)|p+1dx+∑i≠j∫BiK(x)|ttiϕi|p+1dx. | (3.9) |
According to ϕj(x)=1 for x∈Fj and |tj|=1, one has that
∫FjK(x)|ttjϕj|p+1dx=|t|p+1∫FjK(x)dx. | (3.10) |
By (H3), one has that
∫Bj∖FjK(x)|ttjϕj(x)|p+1dx+∑i≠j∫BiK(x)|ttiϕi|p+1dx≥0. | (3.11) |
So, combining (3.3), (3.4), (3.5) and (3.6), we have that
φ(tv)t2≤12αl+12‖V‖∞cl−|t|p+1(p+1)t2inf1≤i≤l(∫FiK(x)dx). |
Therefore, it is easy to see that
limt→0supv∈Wlφ(tv)t2=−∞. |
Hence, we can fixed t small enough such that sup{φ(v),v∈Al}<0, where Al=tWl∈Γl.
Lemma 3.5. If (H1)−(H3) hold. Then φ is bounded from below.
Proof. By (H3), Hölder inequality and Sobolev embedding, as in the proof of Lemma 3.1, we have that
φ(u)=12∫RN(|Δu|2+V(x)u2)dx−1p+1∫RNK(x)|u|p+1dx≥12∫RN(|Δu|2−V−(x)u2)dx−1p+1∫RNK+(x)|u|p+1dx≥(12−S‖V−‖N42)‖Δu‖22−Sp+12p+1‖K+‖2∗2∗−p−1‖Δu‖p+12. |
Since 0<p<1, we conclude the proof.
The proof of Theorem 1.1
Proof. In fact, φ(0)=0 and φ is an even functional. Then by Lemma 3.3, Lemma 3.4 and Lemma 3.5, the conditions (1) and (2) of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied. Therefore, by Theorem 2.1, problem (1.1) possesses infinitely many nontrivial solutions converging to 0 with negative energy.
Remark 3.1. By using Theorem 2.1, we obtain infinitely many nontrivial solutions to problem (1.1). For infinitely many nontrivial solutions converges to 0, we must verify that the functional φ satisfies some assumption like (A3) in [39], (see Remark 1.2 in [39]). In fact, we can verify this property by following similar inequality obtained in [[40], page 460].
In this paper, by using the symmetric Mountain Pass Theorem, we prove a class of biharmonic equations with indefinite potentials has infinitely many solutions. Because our result mainly involves theoretical research, we don't know how to use our result to the real applications in practical problems. So, we should pay attention to both theoretical research and practical application in the follow-up work.
The paper is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 11561043, 11961043) and Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 11501318).
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Y. Chen, P. J. McKenna, Traveling waves in a nonlinearly suspension beam: Theoretical results and numerical observations, J. Differ. Equations, 135 (1997), 325-355. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1996.3155
![]() |
[2] |
A. C. Lazer, P. J. McKenna, Large-amplitude periodic oscillations in suspension bridges: Some new connections with nonlinear analysis, Siam. Rev., 32 (1990), 537-578. doi: 10.1137/1032120
![]() |
[3] |
P. J. McKenna, W. Walter, Traveling waves in a suspension bridge, Siam J. Appl. Math., 50 (1990), 703-715. doi: 10.1137/0150041
![]() |
[4] |
C. O. Alves, J. Marcos do Ó, O. H. Miyagaki, Nontrivial solutions for a class of semilinear biharmonic problems involving critical exponents, Nonlinear Anal-Theor., 46 (2001), 121-133. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(99)00449-6
![]() |
[5] |
K. Kefi, K. Saoudi, On the existence of a weak solution for some singular p(x)-biharmonic equation with Navier boundary conditions, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 8 (2018), 1171-1183. doi: 10.1515/anona-2016-0260
![]() |
[6] | J. Liu, S. X. Chen, X. Wu, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a class of fourth-order elliptic equations in RN, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 395 (2012), 608-615. |
[7] | A. Mao, W. Wang, Nontrivial solutions of nonlocal fourth order elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type in R3, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 459 (2018), 556-563. |
[8] |
Y. Pu, X. P. Wu, C. L. Tang, Fourth-order Navier boundary value problem with combined nonlinearities, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 398 (2013), 798-813. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.09.019
![]() |
[9] | M. T. O. Pimenta, S. H. M. Soares, Singulary perturbed biharmonic problem with superlinear nonlinearities, Adv. Differential Equ., 19 (2014), 31-50. |
[10] |
Y. Su, H. Chen, The existence of nontrivial solution for a class of sublinear biharmonic equations with steep potential well, Bound. Value Probl., 2018 (2018), 1-14. doi: 10.1186/s13661-017-0918-2
![]() |
[11] |
X. Wang, A. Mao, A. Qian, High energy solutions of modified quasilinear fourth-order elliptic equation, Bound. Value Probl., 2018 (2018), 1-13. doi: 10.1186/s13661-017-0918-2
![]() |
[12] |
Y. Wang, Y. Shen, Multiple and sign-changing solutions for a class of semilinear biharmonic equation, J. Differ. Equations, 246 (2009), 3109-3125. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.02.016
![]() |
[13] |
Y. Wei, Multiplicity results for some fourth-order elliptic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 385 (2012), 797-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.07.011
![]() |
[14] | M. B. Yang, Z. F. Shen, Infinitely many solutions for a class of fourth order elliptic equations in RN, Acta Math. Sin., 24 (2008), 1269-1278. |
[15] |
Y. W. Ye, C. L. Tang, Infinitely many solutions for fourth-order elliptic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 394 (2012), 841-854. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.04.041
![]() |
[16] | Y. W. Ye, C. L. Tang, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for fourth-order elliptic equations in RN, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 406 (2013), 335-351. |
[17] |
Y. L. Yin, X. Wu, High energy solutions and nontrivial solutions for fourth-order elliptic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 375 (2011), 699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.10.019
![]() |
[18] |
J. Zhang, Z. Wei, Infinitely many nontrivial solutions for a class of biharmonic equations via variant fountain theorems, Nonlinear Anal-Theor., 74 (2011), 7474-7485. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.07.067
![]() |
[19] |
W. Zhang, X. H. Tang, J. Zhang, Infinitely many solutions for fourth-order elliptic equations with sign-changing potential, Taiwan. J. Math., 18 (2014), 645-659. doi: 10.11650/tjm.18.2014.3584
![]() |
[20] |
W. Zhang, X. H. Tang, J. Zhang, Infinitely many solutions for fourth-order elliptic equations with general potentials, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 407 (2013), 359-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.05.044
![]() |
[21] |
W. Zhang, X. H. Tang, J. Zhang, Existence and concentration of solutions for sublinear fourthorder elliptic equations, Electronic J. Differ. Eq., 2015 (2015), 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s13662-014-0331-4
![]() |
[22] |
J. W. Zhou, X. Wu, Sign-changing solutions for some fourth-order nonlinear elliptic problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 342 (2008), 542-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.12.020
![]() |
[23] | A. Bahrouni, H. Ounaies, V. D. Rădulescu, Bound state solutions of sublinear Schrödinger equations with lack of compactness, Racsam. Rev. R. Acad. A., 113 (2019), 1191-1210. |
[24] |
A. Bahrouni, V. D. Rădulescu, D. Repovs, Double phase transonic flow problems with variable growth: nonlinear patterns and stationary waves, Nonlinearity, 32 (2019), 2481-2495. doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/ab0b03
![]() |
[25] |
G. Bonanno, G. D'Aguì, A. Sciammetta, Nonlinear elliptic equations involving the p-Laplacian with mixed Dirichlet-Neumann boundary conditions, Opuscula Math., 39 (2018), 159-174. doi: 10.7494/OpMath.2019.39.2.159
![]() |
[26] |
Y. Li, D. B. Wang, J. Zhang, Sign-changing solutions for a class of p-Laplacian Kirchhoff-type problem with logarithmic nonlinearity, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 2100-2112. doi: 10.3934/math.2020139
![]() |
[27] | N. S. Papageorgiou, V. D. Radulescu, D. D. Repovs, Nonlinear analysis-theory and methods, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Cham, 2019. |
[28] |
N. S. Papageorgiou, V. D. Radulescu, D. D. Repovs, Positive solutions for nonlinear parametric singular Dirichlet problems, Bull. Math. Sci., 9 (2019), 1950011. doi: 10.1142/S1664360719500115
![]() |
[29] |
H. R. Quoirin, K. Umezu, An elliptic equation with an indefinite sublinear boundary condition, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 8 (2019), 175-192. doi: 10.1515/anona-2016-0023
![]() |
[30] | D. B. Wang, Least energy sign-changing solutions of Kirchhoff-type equation with critical growth, J. Math. Phys., 61 (2020), 011501. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5074163. |
[31] | D. B. Wang, T. Li, X. Hao, Least-energy sign-changing solutions for KirchhoffSchrödinger-Poisson systems in R3, Bound. Value Probl., 75 (2019). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-019-1183-3. |
[32] | D. B. Wang, Y. Ma, W. Guan, Least energy sign-changing solutions for the fractional Schrödinger-Poisson systems in R3, Bound. Value Probl., 25 (2019). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-019-1128-x. |
[33] |
D. B. Wang, H. Zhang, W. Guan, Existence of least-energy sign-changing solutions for Schrödinger-Poisson system with critical growth, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 479 (2019), 2284-2301. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.07.052
![]() |
[34] |
D. B. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Ma, et al. Ground state sign-changing solutions for a class of nonlinear fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with potential vanishing at infinity, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 61 (2019), 611-634. doi: 10.1007/s12190-019-01265-y
![]() |
[35] | D. B. Wang, J. Zhang, Least energy sign-changing solutions of fractional Kirchhoff-SchrödingerPoisson system with critical growth, App. Math. Lett., 106 (2020), 106372. |
[36] |
J. Zhao, X. Liu, Z. Feng, Quasilinear equations with indefinite nonlinearity, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 8 (2018), 1235-1251. doi: 10.1515/anona-2018-0010
![]() |
[37] | P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to differential equations, CBMS Regional Conf. Ser. in. Math., 65, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1986. |
[38] |
A. Ambrosetti, P. H. Rabinowitz, Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications, J. Funct. Anal., 14 (1973), 349-381. doi: 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7
![]() |
[39] |
R. Kajikiya, A critical point theorem related to the symmetric mountain pass lemma and its applications to elliptic equations, J. Funct. Anal., 225 (2005), 352-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2005.04.005
![]() |
[40] |
A. Bahrouni, H. Ounaies, V. D. Rădulescu, Infinitely many solutions for a class of sublinear Schrödinger equations with indefinite potential, P. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, Sect. A, 145 (2015), 445-465. doi: 10.1017/S0308210513001169
![]() |
1. | Dengfeng Lu, Shuwei Dai, On existence results for a class of biharmonic elliptic problems without (AR) condition, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 18897, 10.3934/math.2024919 |