This research was concerned with a linear theory of thermoelasticity with microtemperatures where the second thermal displacement gradient and the second gradient of microtemperatures are included in the classical set of independent constitutive variables. The master balance laws of micromorphic continua, the theory of the strain gradient of elasticity, and Green-Naghdi thermomechanics were used to derive a second gradient theory. The semigroup theory of linear operators allowed us to prove that the problem of the second gradient thermoelasticity with microtemperatures is well-posed. For the equations of isotropic rigids, we presented a natural extension of the Cauchy-Kovalevski-Somigliana solution of isothermal theory. In the case of stationary vibrations, the fundamental solutions of the basic equations were obtained. Uniqueness and instability of the solutions were obtained in the case of antiplane shear deformations.
Citation: Dorin Ieşan, Ramón Quintanilla. Second gradient thermoelasticity with microtemperatures[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(2): 537-555. doi: 10.3934/era.2025025
[1] | N. Bazarra, J. R. Fernández, R. Quintanilla . A dual-phase-lag porous-thermoelastic problem with microtemperatures. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(4): 1236-1262. doi: 10.3934/era.2022065 |
[2] | Yao Sun, Lijuan He, Bo Chen . Application of neural networks to inverse elastic scattering problems with near-field measurements. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 7000-7020. doi: 10.3934/era.2023355 |
[3] | Youjun Deng, Hongyu Liu, Xianchao Wang, Dong Wei, Liyan Zhu . Simultaneous recovery of surface heat flux and thickness of a solid structure by ultrasonic measurements. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(5): 3081-3096. doi: 10.3934/era.2021027 |
[4] | Nisachon Kumankat, Kanognudge Wuttanachamsri . Well-posedness of generalized Stokes-Brinkman equations modeling moving solid phases. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1641-1661. doi: 10.3934/era.2023085 |
[5] | Yue Feng, Yujie Liu, Ruishu Wang, Shangyou Zhang . A conforming discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on rectangular partitions. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(3): 2375-2389. doi: 10.3934/era.2020120 |
[6] | Jincheng Shi, Shuman Li, Cuntao Xiao, Yan Liu . Spatial behavior for the quasi-static heat conduction within the second gradient of type Ⅲ. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6235-6257. doi: 10.3934/era.2024290 |
[7] | Simon Eberle, Arnulf Jentzen, Adrian Riekert, Georg S. Weiss . Existence, uniqueness, and convergence rates for gradient flows in the training of artificial neural networks with ReLU activation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(5): 2519-2554. doi: 10.3934/era.2023128 |
[8] | Dandan Li, Songhua Wang, Yan Xia, Xuejie Ma . Convergence analysis of a three-term extended RMIL CGP-based algorithm for constrained nonlinear equations and image denoising applications. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(6): 3584-3612. doi: 10.3934/era.2025160 |
[9] | Mingtao Cui, Wennan Cui, Wang Li, Xiaobo Wang . A polygonal topology optimization method based on the alternating active-phase algorithm. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(2): 1191-1226. doi: 10.3934/era.2024057 |
[10] | Noelia Bazarra, José R. Fernández, Ramón Quintanilla . On the mixtures of MGT viscoelastic solids. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(12): 4318-4340. doi: 10.3934/era.2022219 |
This research was concerned with a linear theory of thermoelasticity with microtemperatures where the second thermal displacement gradient and the second gradient of microtemperatures are included in the classical set of independent constitutive variables. The master balance laws of micromorphic continua, the theory of the strain gradient of elasticity, and Green-Naghdi thermomechanics were used to derive a second gradient theory. The semigroup theory of linear operators allowed us to prove that the problem of the second gradient thermoelasticity with microtemperatures is well-posed. For the equations of isotropic rigids, we presented a natural extension of the Cauchy-Kovalevski-Somigliana solution of isothermal theory. In the case of stationary vibrations, the fundamental solutions of the basic equations were obtained. Uniqueness and instability of the solutions were obtained in the case of antiplane shear deformations.
In recent years, Green-Naghdi thermodynamics [1,2,3] has been used to establish some theories of thermoelasticity that take into account the second-order temperature gradient [4,5,6]. On the other hand, the balance laws of the continua with microstructure [7,8,9,10] led to a theory of thermodynamics of elastic materials where the inner structure has microelements with microtemperatures. At the begin of this paper, we use the theory of non-simple elastic solids [11,12,13] and results from thermodynamics of multipolar continua [14] to obtain a second gradient theory of thermoelasticity with microtemperatures. An introduction of the concepts of thermal displacement and thermal microdisplacements as well as the theory of multipolar continua allows us to derive the local form of energy balance and constitutive equations. In [3], the authors established a theory of thermoelasticity characterized by constitutive equations that depend on the first gradient of the displacement vector, on temperature, and on the first gradient of thermal displacement. In the present work, we have consider the following new independent constitutive variables: the second gradient of thermal displacement, the second gradient of thermal microdisplacements, as well as microtemperatures. To simplify the writing, we limit our attention only to the introduction of the second-order spatial derivatives of the thermal variables.
We express the field equations of the linear case in terms of components of the displacement vector, thermal displacement, and thermal microdisplacements, and obtain a fourth-order system of equations. The boundary-initial-value problems are also formulated. The semigroup theory of linear operators allows us to prove that the problem of the second gradient thermoelasticity with microtemperatures is well-posed. For the equations of isotropic rigids, we present a natural extension of the Cauchy-Kovalevski-Somigliana solution of the isothermal theory. In the case of stationary vibrations, we establish the fundamental solutions of the basic equations. Anti-plane shear deformations are also considered and uniqueness and instability results are obtained.
The relevance in introducing temperature gradient effects in thermomechanics can be recalled from [15].
In this section, we propose a second gradient theory of solids with microtemperatures by using the basic laws of mechanics of materials with microstructure and Green-Naghdi thermomechanics. Throughout this paper, the motion of the body is referred to the reference configuration B, occupied by the body at time t0, and to a fixed system of rectangular Cartesian coordinates Oxj, (j = 1, .., 3). Latin subscripts range over the integers (1, 2, 3), and Greek subscripts range over the integers (1, 2). Cartesian tensor notation is used throughout. In what follows, xj are reference coordinates, yj are spatial coordinates, a superposed dot denotes material time differentiation, and f,j denotes partial differentiation of f with respect to xj. We denote by ∂B the boundary of B. Following [1,2], we get the following local balance of entropy:
ρ˙η=Si,i+ρ(s+ξ). | (2.1) |
By using the theory of continua with microstructure [9], we can obtain the balance of the first moment of entropy in the form:
ρ˙ηj=Λki,k+Si−Hi+ρ(Qi+ξi), | (2.2) |
In the relations (2.1) and (2.2), we have used the following notations: ρ is the reference mass density; η is the entropy per unit mass of the body; Si is the entropy flux vector; s is the external rate of supply of entropy per unit mass; ξ is the internal rate of production of entropy per unit mass; ηj is the first entropy moment vector; Λij is the first entropy flux moment tensor; Hi is the mean entropy flux vector; Qi is the first moment of the external rate of supply of entropy, and ξj is the first moment of the internal rate of production of entropy. The entropy flux Σ and the first entropy moment flux vector σj at regular points of ∂B are given by [1,2,8],
Σ=Sjnj,σk=Λjknj, | (2.3) |
where ni is the outward unit normal of ∂B. Let θ be the absolute temperature. We denote by x the center of mass of a generic microelement V. We assume that for x′∈V, we have
θ(x′,t)=θ(x,t)+Ti(x,t)(x′i−xi). | (2.4) |
We call the functions Ti microtemperatures. As in [1], we consider the thermal displacement α and the thermal microdisplacements βj by
˙α=θ,˙βj=Tj. | (2.5) |
We now consider a domain P at time t, bounded by a surface ∂P, and let P be the respective domain in reference configuration, with the boundary ∂P. In view of [1,9,11,14], we propose an energy balance in the form:
∫Pρ(¨ui˙ui+˙e)dv=∫Pρ(fi˙ui+sθ+QiTi)dv+∫∂P(ti˙ui+Σθ+σjTj+Gjθ,j+ΠjiTi,j)da | (2.6) |
for every region P of B and every time. Here ui is the displacement vector, e is the internal energy per unit mass fi is the body force per unit mass, ti the stress vector associated with the surface ∂P but measured per unit area of ∂P, and Gi and Πij are the monopolar and dipolar entropy flux per unit area, respectively. We impose that the dipolar body force and the spin inertia per unit mass are not present (see [14]). From (2.6), we can derive the balance of linear momentum so that, by the well-known method, we obtain
tj=tijni | (2.7) |
and
tji,j+ρfi=ρ¨ui | (2.8) |
where tij is the stress tensor. After the use of the divergence theorem and the equalities (2.1)–(2.3), (2.7), and (2.8), the relation (2.6) can be written in the form:
∫Pρ˙edv=∫P[tji˙ui,j+ρ˙ηθ+ρ˙ηjTj+Sjθ,j+ΛkjTj,k−(Si−Hi)Ti−ρξθ−ρξjTj]dv+∫∂P(Gjθ,j+ΠjiTi,j)da. | (2.9) |
With an argument similar to that used to derive the relation (2.7), from (2.9), we obtain
(Gj−Gkjnk)θ,j+(Πji−Πkjink)Ti,j=0, | (2.10) |
where Gkj and Πkji are tensors associated to the surface loads Gi and Πji, respectively. With the help of (2.10), we obtain the local expression form of the energy balance
ρ˙e=tji˙ui,j+ρ˙ηθ+ρ˙ηjTj+Fjθ,j+ΓkjTj,k+(Hi−Si)Ti+Gkjθ,jk+ΠkjiT,ijk−ρξθ−ρξjTj, | (2.11) |
where the following notation
Fj=Sj+Gkj,k,Γkj=Λkj+Πmkj,m, | (2.12) |
is used.
Following [14], we assume a motion of the body that is different from the given motion by a superposed uniform rigid body angular velocity, and that ρ,e,tij,η,θ,ηj,Tj,Sj,Λkj,Hj,Fj,Γkj,ξ, and ξj do not change by such motion. The equality (2.11) implies that
tji=tij. | (2.13) |
If we consider the Helmholtz free energy ψ by
ψ=e−θη−Tjηj, | (2.14) |
and we see that the energy balance may be written in the form:
ρ(˙ψ+θ˙η+Tj˙ηj)=tij˙eij+Fjθ,j+ΓkjTj,k+(Hi−Si)Ti+Gkjθ,jk+ΠkijTi,jk−ρξθ−ρξjTj, | (2.15) |
where we have introduced the strain tensor
2eij=ui,j+uj,i. | (2.16) |
From now on, we define the constitutive equations for ψ,tij,η,ηj,Sj,Hj,Gkj, Fj,Γkj,Πkj,ξ, and ξj, and we suppose that these are functions of the set V=(eij,θ,Tj,α,j,βk,j,α,ij,βk,ij). To simplify the writting, we omit the explicit dependence of xk and then the material should be homogeneous and assume that there is no kinematical constraint. In the theory established in [3], the constitutive variables are eij,θ, and α,j. If we introduce the notation A=ρψ, then Eq (2.15) becomes
(∂A∂eij−tij)˙eij+(∂A∂θ+ρη)˙θ+(∂A∂Ti+ρηi)˙Ti+(∂A∂α,i−Fi)θ,i+(∂A∂βj,i−Γij)Tj,i+(∂A∂α,ij−Gji)θ,ij+(∂A∂βi,jk−Πkji)Ti,jk+ρθξ+(ρξi+Si−Hi)Ti=0. | (3.1) |
From (3.1), we find that [3]
tij=∂A∂eij,ρη=−∂A∂θ,ρηj=−∂A∂Tj,Fi=∂A∂α,i,Γij=∂A∂βj,i,Gji=∂A∂α,ij,Πkji=∂A∂βi,jk, | (3.2) |
and
ρξθ+(ρξi+Si−Hi)Ti=0. | (3.3) |
We introduce the notations
θ(x,t0)=T0,Tj(x,t0)=T0j,α(x,t0)=α0,βj(x,t0)=β0j, | (3.4) |
where t0 is a reference time and T0, T0j,α0, and β0j are given constants. As in [3], we consider new thermal variables
T=θ−T0,θi=Ti−T0i,χ=∫t0Tds,φi=∫t0θids. | (3.5) |
From (3.4) and (3.5), we get
α=χ+T0(t−t0)+α0,βj=φj+T0j(t−t0)+β0j,α,i=χ,i,βi,j=φi,j,˙χ=T,˙φi=θi. | (3.6) |
From now on, we restrict our attention to the linear theory where the functions ui, T, and θj can be written as
ui=ϵu′i,T=ϵT′,θj=ϵθ′j |
where ϵ is a parameter small enough for squares and higher powers to be neglected, and u′i, T′, and θ′j are independent of ϵ. As usual, we assume that A is a quadratic form of the variables eij,T,θj,α,j,βk,j,α,ij, and βk,ij and that Hi,ξ, and ξj are linear functions of the same variables. We consider the case of a material with a center of symmetry. Thus, we have
2A=Aijrseijers−2bijeijT+2Cijrseijφr,s+2Dijrseijχ,rs−aT2−2LijTφi,j−2NijTχ,ij−Bijθiθj−2Cijθiχ,j−2dipqrφp,qrθi+Kijχ,iχ,j+2Mipqrχ,iφp,qr+Eijrsφi,jφr,s+2Hijrsφi,jχ,rs+Uijkpqrφi,jkφp,qr+Qijrsχ,ijχ,rs. | (3.7) |
The following symmetries are satisfied:
Aijrs=Ajirs=Arsij,bij=bji,Cijrs=Cjirs,Dijrs=Djirs=Djisr,Bij=Bji,Nij=Nji,dipqr=diprq,Kij=Kji,Eijrs=Ersij,Mipqr=Miprq,Hijrs=Hijsr,Uijkpqr=Upqrijk=Uikjpqr,Qijrs=Qrsij=Qjirs. | (3.8) |
It follows from (3.2), (3.7), and (3.8) that
tij=Aijrsers−bijT+Cijrsφr,s+Dijrsχ,rs,ρη=bijeij+aT+Lijφi,j+Nijχ,ij,ρηi=Bijθj+Cijχ,j+dipqrφp,qr,Fj=−Cijθi+Kijχ,i+Mjpqrφp,qr,Γij=Crsjiers−LjiT+Ejirsφr,s+Hjirsχ,rs,Gji=Drsijers−NijT+Qijrsχ,rs+Hrsijφr,s,Πkji=−drijkθr+Msijkχ,s+Uijkpqrφp,qr. | (3.9) |
For isotropic materials, the number of constitutive coefficients is drastically reduced (see [12]). From (3.3), we see that the response function ξ vanishes when the microtemperatures Tj vanish. In the linear case, the function ξ that satisfies this requirement must be ξ=cjTj, where cj are constants. Since the body has a center of symmetry, we get ξ=0. Thus, from (2.12), (3.3), and (3.9), we find that
ρξi=Hi−Si. | (3.10) |
If we use these results, then Eqs (2.1) and (2.2) take the form
ρη=Sk,k+ρs,ρηi=Λki,k+ρQi. | (3.11) |
The equations of the linear theory consist of the equations of motion (2.8), the energy equations (3.11), the constitutive equations (3.9), and the geometrical equations (2.16). In view of (2.12), we can write the Eqs (3.11) in the form
Fk,k−Gkj,kj−ρ˙η=−ρs,Γij,i−Πrkj,rk−ρ˙ηj=−ρQj. | (3.12) |
Equations (2.8) and (3.11) can be expressed in terms of the unknowns uj, χ, and φi. Thus, we obtain the equations
Aijrsur,sj−bij˙χ,j+Djirkχ,rkj+Cijrsφr,sj+ρfi=ρ¨ui,−Drpqkur,pqk−bij˙ui,j+Kijχ,ij−Qijrsχ,ijrs−a¨χ−Rpqjrφp,qrj−pij˙φi,j=−ρs,Crsjkur,sk−pjk˙χ,k+ζpjqr˙φp,qr+Rjkrsχ,rsk+Ejkrsφr,sk−Ujrspqmφp,qmsr−Bjk¨φk=−ρQj, | (3.13) |
where
Rjkrs=Hjkrs−Mrjks,ζpjqr=dpjqr−djpqr,pjk=Ljk+Cjk. | (3.14) |
To the system (3.13), we have to adjoin boundary and initial conditions.
Now, we study the boundary conditions and formulate the basic boundary-initial-value problems. We assume that the boundary of B consists of the union of a finite number of smooth surfaces, smooth curves (edges), and points (corners). Let C be the union of the edges. As in [11,12], to obtain the form of the boundary conditions, we must study the surface integral in (2.5). By using (2.3), (2.7), and (2.10), we find that
∫∂P(ti˙ui+Σθ+σjTj+Gjθ,j+ΠjiTi,j)da=∫∂P[tki˙ui+(Fk−Grk,r)θ+(Γkj−Πmkj,m)Tj+Gkjθ,j+ΠkjiTi,j]nkda. | (4.1) |
We will use the notations
Df=f,jnj, Di=(δij−ninj)∂∂xj, | (4.2) |
where δij is the Kronecker delta. Then we obtain
Gkjθ,jnk=Gkj nknlDθ−θ(Gkjnk)+Dj(Gkjnkθ),ΠkjiTi,jnk=ΠkjinknjDTi−TiDj(Πkjink)+Dj(ΠkjinkTi). | (4.3) |
As in [11,12], from (4.1) and (4.3), we get
∫∂P(ti˙ui+Σθ+σjTj+Gjθ,j+ΠjiTi,j)da=∫∂P(ti˙ui+Φ1θ+Φ2Dθ+ΨjTj+WiDTi)da+∫C(Yθ+ΩiTi)ds | (4.4) |
where
Φ1=(Fk−Grk,r)nk−Dj(nsGsj)+(Djnj)nsnpGsp,Φ2=Grsnrns,Ψi=(Γki−Πrki,r)nk−Dj(nsΠsji)+(Djnj)nsnpΠspi,Wi=Πrsinrns,Y=<Grsnrys>,Ωi=<Πrsinrys>,yi=ϵirksrnk. | (4.5) |
Here, sk are the components of the unit vector tangent to C, <f> denotes the difference of the limits of f from both sides of C, and ϵjrk is the alternating symbol. The first boundary-initial-value problem is characterized by the boundary conditions
ui=u∗i,χ=χ∗,φi=φ∗i,Dχ=ζ∗,Dφi=γ∗i on ∂B×I, | (4.6) |
where u∗i,χ∗,φ∗i,ζ∗, and γ∗i are prescribed functions.
For the second boundary-initial-value problem, the boundary conditions are [11]
ti=t∗i,Φ1=Φ∗1,Φ2=Φ∗2,Ψi=Ψ∗i,Wi=W∗i on ∂B×I,Y=Y∗,Ωi=Ω∗i on C×I, | (4.7) |
where t∗i,Φ∗1,Φ∗2,Ψ∗i,W∗i,Y∗, and Ω∗i are given. The initial conditions are
ui(x,0)=u0i(x),˙ui(x,0)=v0i(x),χ(x,0)=χ0(x),˙χ(x,0)=χ1(x),φ(x,0)=φ0i(x),˙φi(x,0)=ν0i(x),x∈B, | (4.8) |
where u0i,v0i,χ0,χ1,φ0i, and ν0i are given.
Now, we provide an existence and uniqueness result for the problem determined by the system of Eqs (3.13), with the initial condition (4.8) and the homogeneous version of the boundary conditions (4.6). We will use the theory of contractive linear semigroups [16].
We assume once and for all that:
(ⅰ) The mass density ρ and the thermal capacity a are strictly positive.
(ⅱ) The matrix Bij is positive definite.
(ⅲ) The quadratic form
W(eij,κijk,χ,i,χ,ji,φ,i,φ,ij)= |
Aijrseijers+2Cijrseijφr,s+2Dijrseijχ,rs+Kijχ,iχ,j+2Mipqrχ,iφp,qr |
+Eijrsφi,jφr,s+2Hijrsφi,jχ,rs+Uijkpqrφi,jkφp,qr+Qijrsχ,ijχ,rs, |
is positive definite, i.e., there exists a positive constant C such that:
W≥C(eijeij+χ,rχ,r+χ,rsχ,rs+φr,sφr,s+φp,qrφp,qr). |
Let us to propose the problem as an abstract problem in a suitable Hilbert space. We will work on the space
H=W1,20(B)×L2(B)×W2,20(B)×L2(B)×W2,20(B)×L2(B), |
where W1,20,W2,20, and L2 are the usual Sobolev spaces, W2,20=[W2,20]3 and L2=[L2]3. The elements in this space can be denoted by U=(u,v,χ,θ,φ,ϕ).
We consider the scalar product associated to the norm
||(u,v,χ,θ,φ,ϕ)||2=∫B[ρvivi+aθ2+Bijϕiϕj+W(eij,χ,i,χ,ji,φ,i,φ,ij)]dv. | (5.1) |
Now, we want to see our problem as a Cauchy problem in H. We define the operator
A(uvχθφϕ)=(vMθυϕΩ) | (5.2) |
where
M=(Mi),Ω=(ωi), |
and
Mi=ρ−1(Aijrsur,sj−bijθ,j+Cijrsφr,sj+Djirkχ,rkj), |
ωi=Fij(Crsjkur,sk−pjkθ,k+ζpjqrϕp,qr+Rjkrsχ,rsk |
+Ejkrsφr,sk−Ujrspqmφp,qmsr), |
υ=a−1(−Drpqkur,pqk−bijvi,j+Kijχ,ij−Qijrsχ,ijrs−Rpqjrφp,qrj |
−pijϕi,j), |
where FijBjk=δik.
We note that our problem can be written as
dUdt=AU+F(t),U(0)=(u0,v0,χ0,χ1,φ0,ν0), | (5.3) |
where
F(t)=(0,f(t),0,ρa−1s,0,ρFijQj). |
The domain of the operator A is the subspace of elements of our Hilbert space such that
v∈W1,20,ϕ∈W2,20,θ∈W2,2, |
Aijrsur,sj+Djirkχ,rkj−bijθ,j∈L2, |
−Drpqkur,pqk−Qijrsχ,ijrs−Rpqjrφp,qrj∈L2, |
and
Crsjkur,sk+Rjkrsχ,rsk−Ujrspqmφp,qmsr∈L2. |
This domain is a dense subset of our space.
After an easy but laborious calculation, we can see that
<AU,U>=0, |
for every element U at the domain of the operator.
The next step in our approach is to show that zero belongs to the resolvent of the operator. Let U∗ be in H. We must prove that the equation
AU=U∗ |
admits a solution. That is
v=u∗,θ=χ∗,ϕ=φ∗, |
M=v∗,υ=θ∗,Ω=ϕ∗. |
We substitute the first three equations into the others to find that
Aijrsur,sj+Cijrsφr,sj+Djirkχ,rkj=ρv∗i+bijχ∗,j, |
−Drpqkur,pqk+Kijχ,ij−Qijrsχ,ijrs−Rpqjrφp,qrj |
=aθ∗+biju∗i,j+pijφ∗i,j, |
Crsjkur,sk+Rjkrsχ,rsk+Ejkrsφr,sk |
−Ujrspqmφp,qmsr=Bjkϕ∗k+pjkχ∗,k−ζpjqrφ∗p,qr. |
If we denote
αi1=ρv∗i+bijχ∗,j,α2=aθ∗+biju∗i,j+pijφ∗i,j, |
α3j=Bjkϕ∗k+pjkχ∗,k−ζpjqrφ∗p,qr,A1i=Aijrsur,sj+Cijrsφr,sj+Djirkχ,rkj, |
A2=−Drpqkur,pqk+Kijχ,ij−Qijrsχ,ijrs−Rpqjrφp,qrj, |
A3j=Crsjkur,sk+Rjkrsχ,rsk+Ejkrsφr,sk−Ujrspqmφp,qmsr, |
then our system can be written as
Ai1=αi1,A2=α2,Ai3=αi3. |
To solve this last system, we note that (αi1,α2,αi3)∈[W−1,2]3×[W−2,2]4 and that the form
B(u,χ,φ),(u∗,χ∗,φ∗)]=∫B(Ai1u∗i+A2χ∗+Ai3φi)dv |
defines a form in [W1,20]3×[W2,20]4 which is bounded and coercive. In view of the Lax-Migram lemma [17], we can guarantee the existence of solutions to our system as well as the existence of a positive constant K (independent of the point) such that
||U||≤K||U∗||. |
In view of the previous arguments, we can conclude that A generates a contractive semigroup. Therefore, we obtained the following result:
Theorem 1. Let us assume that fi,s, and Qi are functions continuous at the domain of the operator A and of class C1 in L2. Then, there exists a unique solution to the problem (5.3) that is continuous in the domain of the operator and is of class C1 in the Hilbert space H.
It is well-known that we also obtain
||U(t)||≤||U(0)||+∫t0||F(s)||ds, |
which establishes the continuous dependence of solutions on initial and supply terms. Thus, we can say that under the conditions (ⅰ), (ⅱ), and (ⅲ), the problem of the second gradient thermoelasticity with microtemperatures is well-posed.
Now, we state the constitutive equations for isotropic materials and express the basic equations in terms of the unknown functions ui, χ, and φi. For centrosymmetric and isotropic materials, the number of independent parameters is greatly reduced. Using the general forms of isotropic tensors [12] and taking into account the symmetries (3.8), we obtain
A=λ2eiiejj+μeijeij+C1eiiφr,r+2C2eijφi,j+d1errχ,jj+2d2eijχ,ij−a2T2−βeiiT−γTφr,r−νTχ,rr−b2θjθj−ζθjχ,j+k2χ,jχ,j+μ1χ,jφj,ii+2μ2χ,jφi,ji+12(E1φr,rφi,i+E2φi,jφi,j+E3φi,jφj,i)+γ1φi,ijφj,kk+γ2φi,ijφr,rj+γ3φj,iiφj,kk+γ4φi,jkφi,jk+γ5φi,jkφk,ij+κ12χ,iiχ,jj+κ2χ,ijχ,ij, | (6.1) |
where λ,μ,β,Cα,dα,a,γ,ν,b,ζ,k,μα,Ej,γr, and κα,(α=1,2;r=1,2,..,5), are material coefficients. By using (3.6) and the relations
tij=∂A/∂eij,ρη=−∂A/∂T,ρηj=−∂A/∂θj, |
Fj=∂A/∂χ,j,Γij=∂A/∂φj,i,Πkji=∂A/∂φi,jk, |
we obtain the following constitutive equations
tij=λerrδij+2μeij−βTδij+C1φr,rδij+C2(φi,j+φj,i)+d1χ,rrδij+2d2χ,ij,ρη=βerr+aT+γφj,j+νχ,ii,ρηj=bθj+ζχ,j,Fj=kχ,j−ζθj+μ1φj,ii+2μ2φi,ij,Γij=C1errδij+2C2eij−γTδij+E1φr,rδij+E2φj,i+E3φi,j,Gji=d1errδij+2d2eij−νTδij+κ1χ,kkδij+2κ2χ,ij,Πijk=γ12(φi,rrδjk+2φr,rkδij+φj,rrδik)+γ2(φr,riδjk+φr,rjδik)+2γ3φk,rrδij+2γ4φk,ij+γ5(φi,jk+φj,ki)+μ1χ,kδij+μ2(χ,jδik+χ,iδjk). | (6.2) |
For isotropic solids, the equations for the unknown functions uj, χ, and φi are established by substituting the functions in (6.2) into Eqs (2.8) and (3.12). Thus we obtain the equations:
μΔui+(λ+μ)ur,ri−β˙χ,i+C2Δφi+C3φr,ri+d3Δχ,i+ρfi=ρ¨ui,kΔχ+μ3Δφr,r−(γ+ζ)˙φr,r−d3Δur,r−κ3Δ2χ−∂/∂t(βur,r+a˙χ)=−ρs,C2Δuj+C3ur,rj−(γ+ζ)˙χ,j+E2Δφj+E4φr,rj−b1Δ2φj−b2Δφr,rj−μ3Δχ,j−b¨φj=−ρQj, | (6.3) |
where
C3=C1+C2,d3=d1+2d2,μ3=μ1+2μ2,κ3=κ1+2κ2,E4=E1+E3,b1=2(γ3+γ4),b2=2(γ1+γ2+γ5). | (6.4) |
The problem of heat flow in rigid materials with microtemperatures is characterized by the following equations:
kΔχ+μ3Δφr,r−(γ+ζ)˙φr,r−κ3Δ2χ−a¨χ=−ρs,−(γ+ζ)˙χ,j+E2Δφj+E4φr,rj−b1Δ2φj−b2Δφr,rj−μ3Δχ,j−b¨φj=−ρQj. | (6.5) |
In this section, we establish a representation theorem for solutions of the system (6.5). We will use the notations
A1=kΔ−κ3Δ2−a∂2/∂t2,A2=μ3Δ−(γ+ζ)∂/∂t,A3=−μ3Δ−(γ+ζ)∂/∂t,A4=E2Δ−b1Δ2−b∂2/∂t2,A5=E4−b2Δ,P1=A1A4+ΔP2,P2=A1A5−A2A3. | (7.1) |
Equations (6.5) can be written in the form
A1χ+A2φr,r=−ρs,A3χ,j+A4φj+A5φr,rj=−ρQj. | (7.2) |
A counterpart of the Cauchy-Kovalevski-Somigliana solution of the classical elastodynamics is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 2. Let
χ=−A4(P1Φ+A2A3ΔΦ)+A1A2A4Vj,j,φj=A1A3A4Φ,j+A1(P2Vr,rj−P1Vj), | (7.3) |
where the functions Φ and Vj satisfy
A1A4P1Φ=ρs,A1A4P1Vj=ρQj. | (7.4) |
Then χ and φj satisfy the Eqs (7.2).
Proof. We note that
A1A4+P2Δ−P1=0,A1A3A4+A1A3A5Δ−A23A2Δ−A3P1=0,A21A2A4+A1A2ΔP2−A1A2P1=0,(A4+A5Δ)P2+A2A3A4−A5P1=0,A1A3A4A5Δ+A1A3A24−A3A4P1−A2A23A4Δ=0. | (7.5) |
After substitution of χ and φj given by (7.3) in (7.2), then in view of (7.5) and (7.4), we see
A1χ+A2φr,r=−A1A4P1Φ+A1A2(A1A4+P2Δ−P1)Vj,j=−A1A4P1Φ, |
A3χ,j+A4φj+A5φr,rj=−A1A4P1Vj+(A1A3A24+A1A5A3A4Δ |
−A2A23A4Δ−A3A4P1)Φ,j+A1(A4P2+A2A3A4−A5P1)Vr,rj |
=−A1A4P1Vj. |
With the help of (7.4), we obtain the desired result.
In continuum mechanics, such solution representations have been used to establish the fundamental solutions of the field equations. In classical thermoelasticity, these solutions led to the introduction of the single layer potential and the double layer potential. The method of potentials has been used to reduce boundary value problems of steady vibration theory to singular integral equations and to prove existence theorems (see, e.g., [18]).
In this section, we use the representation (7.1) to establish the fundamental solutions in the case of steady vibrations. We assume that
s=Re[s′(x)exp(−iωt)],Qj=Re[Q′j(x)exp(−iωt)],χ=Re[χ′(x)exp(−iωt)],φj=Re[φ′j(x)exp(−iωt)], | (8.1) |
where ω is a given frequency, x=(x1,x2,x3),i=(−1)1/2, and Re[f] is the real part of the function f. Let us introduce the notations
A∗1=kΔ−κ3Δ2+aω2,A∗2=μ3Δ+iω(γ+ζ),A∗3=−μ3Δ+iω(γ+ζ),A∗4=E2Δ−b1Δ2+bω2,A∗5=E4−b2Δ,P∗1=A∗1A∗4+ΔP∗2,P∗2=A∗1A∗5−A∗2A∗3. | (8.2) |
We obtain a differential system for the amplitudes χ′ and φ′j. To simplify the notation, we omit the primes so that these equations can be written as
A∗1χ+A∗2φr,r=−ρs,A∗3χ,j+A∗4φj+A∗5φr,rj=−ρQj. | (8.3) |
The next theorem is a consequence of previous results.
Theorem 3. Let
χ=−A∗4(P∗1F+A∗2A∗3ΔF)+A∗1A∗2A∗4Uj,j,φj=A∗1A∗3A∗4Fj+A∗1(P∗2Ur,rj−P∗1Uj), | (8.4) |
where the functions F and Uj satisfy
A∗1A∗4P∗1F=ρs,A∗1A∗4P∗1Uj=ρQj. | (8.5) |
Then χ and φj satisfy the Eqs (8.3).
If we introduce the notations
b3=b1+b2,α∗1=−μ23+kb3+κ3(E2+E4),α∗2=k(E2+E4)−ω2(κ3b+ab3),α∗3=ω2(a(E2+E4)+kb+(γ+ζ)2), | (8.6) |
then from (8.2), we get
P∗1=κ3b3Δ4−α∗1Δ3+α∗2Δ2+α∗3Δ+abω4. | (8.7) |
It is easy to see that if k2j(j=1,...,4) are the roots of the equation
κ3b3x4+α∗1x3+α∗2x2−α∗3x+abω4=0, | (8.8) |
then we have
P∗1=κ3b3(Δ+k21)(Δ+k22)(Δ+k23)(Δ+k24). | (8.9) |
We denote by k25 and k26 the roots of the following equation:
κ3x2+kx−aω2=0. | (8.10) |
From (8.6) and (8.10), we obtain
A∗1=−κ3(Δ+k25)(Δ+k26). | (8.11) |
Similarly we find
A∗3=−b1(Δ+k27)(Δ+k28), | (8.12) |
where k27 and k28 are the roots of the equation
b1x2+E2x−bω2=0. | (8.13) |
Let us assume that
s=f,Qj=0, | (8.14) |
where f is a given function. From (8.5), we see that in this case we can take F=e and Uj=0, where e satisfies the equation
P∗1A∗1A∗4e=f. | (8.15) |
We denote by kj(j=1,2,..,8) the roots with positive real parts and assume that they are different. If the functions gj satisfy the equations:
κ23b1b3(Δ+k2j)gj=f(no sum;j=1,2,...,8), | (8.16) |
then the function e can expressed as
e=8∑j=1mjgj, | (8.17) |
where
m−1r=8∏j=1(j≠r)(k2r−k2j). | (8.18) |
We now assume that s=δ(x−y), where δ(.) is the Dirac delta and y is a fixed point. In this case, the solution of the Eq (8.15) is given by
e0=(4πκ23b1b3)−18∑j=1mjexp(ikjr), | (8.19) |
where r=|x−y|. If we take in (8.4), Uj=0, and F=e0, then we obtain the solution
χ(1)=−A∗4{P∗1+A∗2A∗3Δ}e0,φ(1)j=A∗1A∗2A∗4e0,j. | (8.20) |
Let us assume that
s=0,Qi=δijδ(x−y), | (8.21) |
where j is fixed. We see that in this case, Eqs (8.5) are satisfied if we take F=0 and Ui=e0δij. From (8.4), we find the following solution:
χ(1+j)=A∗1A∗2A∗4e0,j,φ(1+j)i=A∗1(P∗2e0,ij−δijP∗1e0). | (8.22) |
The functions χ(k) and φ(k)i(k=1,...,4), given by (8.20) and (8.22), represent the fundamental solutions of the system of equations describing steady vibrations.
In this last section, we use the previous results to study the problem of anti-plane shear deformations. We assume that the domain B from here on refers to a right cylinder of length h with the cross-section D. We select the coordinate frame in such a way that the x3-axis is parallel to the generator of the cylinder. Body loads are assumed to be of the form
fα=0,Qα=0,f3=f(x1,x2,t),Q3=Q(x1,x2,t),s=s(x1,x2,t),α=1,2,t∈I, |
where I=(0,T∗). We look for a solution in the form
uα=0,φα=0,u3=u(x1,x2,t),φ3=φ(x1,x2,t),χ=χ(x1,x2,t),α=1,2. |
We can observe that these functions satisfy our system in the case that the following system
μΔu+C2Δφ+ρf=ρ¨u, |
C2Δu+E2Δφ−b1Δ2φ+ρQ=b¨φ, |
kΔχ−κ3Δ2χ+ρs=a¨χ, |
holds. Throughout this section, the Laplacian operator is considered in the two-dimensional case. We can see that the first two equations are coupled to each other, but both are decoupled from the temperature equation. First of all, we will concentrate our attention on the first two equations. We impose the boundary conditions
u(x1,x2,t)=φ(x1,x2,t)=Δφ(x1,x2,t)=0,(x1,x2)∈∂D,t>0 |
as well as the initial conditions
u(x1,x2,0)=u0(x1,x2),˙u(x1,x2,0)=v0(x1,x2), |
φ(x1,x2,0)=φ0(x1,x2),˙φ(x1,x2,0)=ν0(x1,x2). |
For this problem, the energy satisfies:
E(t)=12∫D(ρ|˙u|2+b|˙φ|2+μ|∇u|2+2C2∇u∇φ+E2|∇φ|2+b1|Δφ|2)dx=E(0), |
whenever we assume f=Q=0, because
˙E(t)=∫D(ρ˙u¨u+b˙φ¨φ+μ∇u∇˙u+C2(∇˙u∇φ+∇u∇˙φ)+E2∇φ∇˙φ+b1ΔφΔ˙φ)dx=∫D(˙u(μΔu+C2Δφ)+˙φ(C2Δu+E2Δφ−b1Δ2φ)dx+∫D(μ∇u∇˙u+C2(∇˙u∇φ+∇u∇˙φ)+E2∇φ∇˙φ+b1ΔφΔ˙φ)dx=0, | (9.1) |
where the last equality follows after the use of the divergence theorem and boundary conditions.
We do not assume any condition on the coefficients μ,C2,E2, and b1, but we are going to obtain a couple of qualitative results for our system. Nevertheless we will need to suppose that ρ and b are two positive real numbers. To do this, it will be convenient to work with a function that will allow us to conclude the desired results. We define this function in the form:
H(t)=∫D(ρu2+bφ2)dx+ω∗(t+t0)2, | (9.2) |
where ω∗ and t0 are two non-negative real numbers to be selected. We have
˙H(t)=2∫D(ρu˙u+bφ˙φ)dx+2ω∗(t+t0), |
and
¨H(t)=2∫D(ρu¨u+bφ¨φ)dx+2∫D(ρ|˙u|2+b|˙φ|2)dx+2ω∗. |
We can notice that
∫D(ρu¨u+bφ¨φ)dx=−∫D(μ|∇u|2+2C2∇φ∇φ+E2|∇φ|2+b1|Δφ|2)dx |
∫D(ρ|˙u|2+b|˙φ|2)dx−2E(0). |
Therefore
¨H(t)=4∫D(ρ|˙u|2+b|˙φ|2)dx+2(ω∗−2E(0)). |
A simple use of Holder's inequality allows us to conclude
H(t)¨H(t)−(˙H(t))2≥−2(ω∗+2E(0))H(t). |
If we put homogeneous initial conditions, we have that E(0)=0 and if we take ω∗=0, we can conclude that
H(t)¨H(t)−(˙H)2≥0. | (9.3) |
This inequality allows us to establish (see [19], p. 19) that
H(t)≤H(0)1−t/T∗H(T∗)t/T∗ |
for all t between 0 and T∗. Thus, in the case where we impose null initial data, we obtain that H(t)=0 for all t in the interval and, consequently we obtain the null solution. This allows us to conclude the uniqueness of the solutions.
If we now go back to the general case and suppose that the initial energy is negative, we can take ω∗=−2E(0) and again conclude the previous inequality. We can also get (see [19], p. 20)
H(t)≥H(0)exp(t˙H(0)H(0)). | (9.4) |
We note that we can always select t0 large enough to guarantee that ˙H(0)>0. When E(0)=0 and ˙H(0)>0, we also conclude the growth estimator.
Theorem 4. Let us to suppose that ρ and b are positive. Then:
(ⅰ) The initial-boundary-value problem for the anti-plane shear deformations has a unique solution.
(ⅱ) When E(0)<0 or (E(0)=0,˙H(0)>0), then the solution is exponentially unstable.
A similar argument could prove the uniqueness and instability of the solutions for the temperature equation in the case that we only assume that a is strictly positive.
The results obtained in this paper can be summarized as follows:
(a) We present a linear theory of thermoelasticity with microtemperatures where the second thermal displacement gradient and the second gradient of microtemperatures are included in the classical set of independent constitutive variables.
(b) We express the field equations of the linear theory in terms of components of the displacement vector, thermal displacement, and thermal microdisplacement, s and obtain a fourth-order system of equations. The boundary-initial-value problems are also formulated.
(c) The semigroup theory of linear operators is used to prove that the problem of the second gradient thermoelasticity with microtemperatures is well-posed.
(d) We establish a counterpart of the Cauchy-Kovalevski-Somigliana solution of the isothermal theory.
(e) In the case of stationary vibrations, we establish the fundamental solutions of the field equations.
(f) Uniqueness and instability of the solutions are obtained in the case of anti-plane shear deformations.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors thank the referees for their helpful suggestions. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Ramón Quintanilla is an editorial board member for Electronic Research Archive and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
[1] |
A. E. Green, P. M. Naghdi, A re-examination of the basic postulates of thermomechanics, Proc. R. Soc. A, 432 (1991), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1991.0012 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1991.0012
![]() |
[2] |
A. E. Green, P. M. Naghdi, A demonstration of consistency of an entropy balance with balance energy, ZAMP, 42 (1991), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00945790 doi: 10.1007/BF00945790
![]() |
[3] |
A. E. Green, P. M. Naghdi, Thermoelasticity without energy dissipation, J. Elast., 31 (1993), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044969 doi: 10.1007/BF00044969
![]() |
[4] |
M. Fabrizio, F. Franchi, R. Nibbi, Second gradient Green–Naghdi type thermoelasticity and viscoelasticity, Mech. Res. Commun., 126 (2022), 104014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2022.104014 doi: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2022.104014
![]() |
[5] |
D. Ieşan, Thermal stresses that depend on temperature gradients, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 74 (2023), 138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-023-02034-5 doi: 10.1007/s00033-023-02034-5
![]() |
[6] |
D. Ieşan, R. Quintanilla, A second gradient theory of thermoelasticity, J. Elast., 154 (2023), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-023-10020-1 doi: 10.1007/s10659-023-10020-1
![]() |
[7] | A. C. Eringen, Mechanics of micromorphic continua, in Mechanics of Generalized Continua (eds. E. Kröner), IUTAM Symposia, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (1968), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30257-6_2 |
[8] |
R. Grot, Thermodynamics of a continuum with microstructure, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 7 (1969), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(69)90062-7 doi: 10.1016/0020-7225(69)90062-7
![]() |
[9] | A. C. Eringen, C. B. Kafadar, Polar field theories, in Continuum Physics, (eds. A. C. Eringen), Academic Press, New York, (1976), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-240804-5.50007-5 |
[10] |
D. Ieşan, R. Quintanilla, Qualitative properties in strain gradient thermoelasticity with microtemperatures, Math. Mech. Solids, 23 (2018), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/10812865166808 doi: 10.1177/10812865166808
![]() |
[11] |
R. A. Toupin, Theories of elasticity with couple-stress, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 17 (1964), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253050 doi: 10.1007/BF00253050
![]() |
[12] |
R. D. Mindlin, Microstructure in linear elasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 16 (1964), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248490 doi: 10.1007/BF00248490
![]() |
[13] |
R. D. Mindlin, N. N. Eshel, On first strain gradient theories in linear elasticity, Int. J. Solids Struct., 4 (1968), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(68)90036-X doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(68)90036-X
![]() |
[14] |
A. E. Green, R. S. Rivlin, Multipolar continuum mechanics, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 17 (1964), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253051 doi: 10.1007/BF00253051
![]() |
[15] |
S. Forest, M. Amestoy, Hypertemperature in thermoelastic solids, Comptes Rendus. Mécanique, 336 (2008), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2008.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.crme.2008.01.007
![]() |
[16] | J. Goldstein, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, 1985. |
[17] | D. Gilbarg, N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61798-0 |
[18] | V. D. Kupradze, T. G. Gegelia, M. O. Basheleishvili, T. V. Burchuladze, Three‐Dimensional Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity and Thermoelasticity, North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1979. |
[19] | K. A. Ames, B. Straughan, Non-standard and Improperly Posed Problems, Academic Press, San Diego, 1997. |
1. | José R. Fernández, Ramón Quintanilla, Structural stability and convergence results in second gradient theory of heat conduction, 2025, 0, 1937-1632, 0, 10.3934/dcdss.2025092 |