
In fault detection, feedback control, and other fields, real-time differential estimation of a given signal in a complex noise environment is an important but challenging task. In this paper, a discrete-time fast nonlinear tracking differentiator (FNTD) based on hyperbolic tangent functions was proposed. To start, the differential signal acquisition problem was equated to the time-optimal control (TOC) law for constructing a double-integral system using a state feedback approach. Next, the FNTD algorithm based on the hyperbolic tangent function was presented by utilizing the isochronic region (IR) method in the discrete time domain. Then, the frequency-domain characteristics of the FNTD were analyzed and the rule for tuning the parameters was provided by the frequency scan test method. Finally, the simulation results demonstrated that the proposed FNTD had fast and accurate tracking performance, as well as excellent filtering and differential extraction capability compared with other differentiators.
Citation: Zhizhou Zhang, Yueliang Pan, Weilong Zhao, Jinchu Zhang, Zheng Zi, Yuan Xie, Hehong Zhang. Frequency analysis of a discrete-time fast nonlinear tracking differentiator algorithm based on isochronic region method[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(9): 5157-5175. doi: 10.3934/era.2024238
[1] | Shaoyuan Xu, Yan Han, Suzana Aleksić, Stojan Radenović . Fixed point results for nonlinear contractions of Perov type in abstract metric spaces with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14895-14921. doi: 10.3934/math.2022817 |
[2] | Amer Hassan Albargi, Jamshaid Ahmad . Fixed point results of fuzzy mappings with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 11572-11588. doi: 10.3934/math.2023586 |
[3] | Muhammad Tariq, Saber Mansour, Abdullah Assiry, Jalil Ur Rehman . Recent advancements in $ M $-cone metric space over Banach algebra endowed with binary relation. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(6): 12935-12955. doi: 10.3934/math.2025582 |
[4] | Gunaseelan Mani, Arul Joseph Gnanaprakasam, Hüseyin Işık, Fahd Jarad . Fixed point results in $ \mathcal{C}^\star $-algebra-valued bipolar metric spaces with an application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 7695-7713. doi: 10.3934/math.2023386 |
[5] | Naeem Saleem, Salman Furqan, Mujahid Abbas, Fahd Jarad . Extended rectangular fuzzy $ b $-metric space with application. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16208-16230. doi: 10.3934/math.2022885 |
[6] | Badshah-e-Rome, Muhammad Sarwar, Thabet Abdeljawad . µ-extended fuzzy b-metric spaces and related fixed point results. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5184-5192. doi: 10.3934/math.2020333 |
[7] | Yan Han, Shaoyuan Xu, Jin Chen, Huijuan Yang . Fixed point theorems for $ b $-generalized contractive mappings with weak continuity conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15024-15039. doi: 10.3934/math.2024728 |
[8] | Umar Ishtiaq, Fahad Jahangeer, Doha A. Kattan, Manuel De la Sen . Generalized common best proximity point results in fuzzy multiplicative metric spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25454-25476. doi: 10.3934/math.20231299 |
[9] | Badshah-e-Rome, Muhammad Sarwar, Kamal Shah, Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad . Some generalized fixed point results of Banach and $ \acute{C} $iri$ \acute{C} $ type in extended fuzzy $ b $-metric spaces with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14029-14050. doi: 10.3934/math.2022774 |
[10] | Muhammad Riaz, Umar Ishtiaq, Choonkil Park, Khaleel Ahmad, Fahim Uddin . Some fixed point results for ξ-chainable neutrosophic and generalized neutrosophic cone metric spaces with application. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14756-14784. doi: 10.3934/math.2022811 |
In fault detection, feedback control, and other fields, real-time differential estimation of a given signal in a complex noise environment is an important but challenging task. In this paper, a discrete-time fast nonlinear tracking differentiator (FNTD) based on hyperbolic tangent functions was proposed. To start, the differential signal acquisition problem was equated to the time-optimal control (TOC) law for constructing a double-integral system using a state feedback approach. Next, the FNTD algorithm based on the hyperbolic tangent function was presented by utilizing the isochronic region (IR) method in the discrete time domain. Then, the frequency-domain characteristics of the FNTD were analyzed and the rule for tuning the parameters was provided by the frequency scan test method. Finally, the simulation results demonstrated that the proposed FNTD had fast and accurate tracking performance, as well as excellent filtering and differential extraction capability compared with other differentiators.
Nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) demonstrate the foundation for the mathematical representation of complicated physical phenomena. These days, analysis of the NLPDEs is being accomplished in many nonlinear fields, including physics, chemical kinematics, meteorology, plasma dynamics, chemistry, propagation of shallow water waves, condensed matter physics, mathematical fluid dynamics, and geochemistry [1,2]. An increasing amount of attention is being paid to research involving soliton wave solutions for NLPDEs. Solitons, also known as permanent-form shallow-water waves, are a unique class of long waves that are non-dispersive and move in the form of packets at a constant speed. Due to their reliability and utility in physics applications, the behavior of solitons has drawn the attention of mathematicians, physicists, and engineers. The soliton develops as a solution to NLPDEs [3,4,5].
GDSGE incorporates the q-deformation parameter to accommodate non-commutative or quantum group effects [6]. It is a variation of the well-known sinh-Gordon equation. The proposed equation has opened up new possibilities for modelling asymmetric physical systems. This work is part of a series we're working on at the moment. This deformation parameter introduces another level of complexity to the system and affects how solutions and soliton structures behave. The objective of this work is to conduct a thorough analysis of the GDSGE, emphasizing its mathematical characteristics and physical applications. The analysis consists of the determination of exact solutions, investigation of soliton dynamics, and detailed study of the impact of the q-deformation element on the behavior of the equation. There hasn't been enough research done on these equations using the q-calculus.
Many effective techniques for solving NLPDEs have been developed in recent years, some of them are Hirota's direct method [7], Jacobi elliptic analysis [8], the physics-informed neural network (PINN) method [9], a sine-cosine technique [10], extended direct algebraic approach, functional variable method, sub-equation approach, extended trial technique, a new auxiliary equation approach, generalized Bernoulli sub-ODE, and numerous others [11,12,13,14,15,16]. In this research work, we conduct a thorough investigation of this nonlinear equation using two different but complementary approaches: the sine-Gordon expansion technique [17,18,19], and the Sardar sub-equation method. Expanding upon the sub-equation approach, the Sardar sub-equation method has shown itself to be an efficient analytical approach for extracting precise informations for nonlinear equations [20,21,22]. With the use of this technique, one may systematically untangle the dynamics suggested by the GDSGE and get insight into how soliton structures and wave patterns are affected by the q-deformation parameter. To enhance our comprehension of the equation, we present the sine-Gordon expansion approach in addition to the SSEM. This approach, which is based on the well-known sine-Gordon equation, offers an alternate viewpoint on the GDSGE dynamics, especially when considering the implications of q-deformation. This study tries to acquire exact solutions and understand complex behaviors affected by the q-deformation parameter by applying the SGEM in conjunction with the SSEM. The results not only advance the theoretical knowledge of NLPDEs but also shed light on the special characteristics developed by the interaction of quantum group deformations and non-commutative effects. This thorough investigation establishes a solid foundation for solving equations including quantum effects and advances our understanding of nonlinear phenomena and mathematical physics.
The governing equation has been investigated for the very first time in this article via Sardar sub-equation method and sine-Gordon expansion approaches. The employed approaches have the ability of extracting full spectrum of solutions that includes bright, dark, Kink solitons and anti-Kink solutions, singular solitons and periodic solutions. The Sardar sub-equation method is an efficient approach and easily applicable on nonlinear evolution equations. It obeys certain constraint conditions that results in providing variety of solitary wave solutions. The main advantage of SSEM is that it yields the bright and dark soliton solutions that have strong physical importance and extensively applied in soliton theory. On the other hand, the sine-Gordon expansion approach is equivalently important. It is very helpful for finding soliton solutions along with complexitons. Both the applied approaches are new, reliable and efficiently applied on NLEEs.
In the past few years, extensive research has been conducted on chaos theory across various scientific fields such as mathematics, physics, and others, as evidenced by multiple sources [23]. In the realm of literature, numerous scholars have explored the phenomenon of chaotic behavior in various nonlinear models. Among these model are Schrödinger equation [24], Sakovich equation [25], system of shallow equations [26], and Ginzburg-Landau model [27].
The article is structured as follows: This paper is divided into nine sections: governing model is described in Section 2. Section 3 is about detailed explanation of Sardar sub-equation method. Section 4 gives the applications of the Sardar sub-equation method. Section 5 analysis the sine-Gordon expansion method. The applications of the sine-Gordon expansion method is carried out Section 6. Results and discussion of obtained solutions is explained in Section 7. Dynamical analysis of the governing model is discussed in section 8. Finally, concluding points are presented in Section 9.
Both the system's and the solution's symmetry are broken when the q-deformed function [28,29], first proposed by Arai in the nineteenth century, is included into the dynamical system. Furthermore, not enough research has been done using the q-calculus to study these equations. Nonetheless, new papers on the subject have been published. Q-calculus is an area of research with several applications. The theory of relativity, special functions, and mathematical physics are only a few of the fields in which the q-calculus has been developed and applied [30,31,32]. The conformal time derivative generalized q-deformation yields the one-dimensional sinh-Gordon equation, also referred to as the Eleuch equation [33]. Such model has been solved with various techniques such as using the G′G expansion methodology and finite element method, the three-dimensional conformal time derivative of the generalised q-deformed sinh-Gordon equation is studied [34]. The generalized q-deformed sinh-Gordon equation is solved analytically with Kudryashov's new generalized version in [35]. A proposed model is investigated using the Lie symmetry method in [36]. In [37], the G′G2 expansion methodology, phase portraits and bifurcation behaviors are carried out for the GDSGE model and many more. In addition, our group studied the solutions of the q-deformed sinh-Gordon equation in several papers [38,39].
In this presented article, we have considered ϵ=−1 which is different as compared to the articles already published. The following is a novel form of GDSGE:
∂2F(x,t)∂x2−∂2F(x,t)∂t2=exp(ϵF(x,t))(SinhqF(x,t)γ)p−δ. | (2.1) |
In this article we discuss its special case: When ϵ=−1, γ=1 and p=1,
∂2F(x,t)∂x2−∂2F(x,t)∂t2=exp(−F(x,t))SinhqF(x,t)−δ. | (2.2) |
In this study we discuss Eq (2.2), we proceed with the following assumptions:
F(x,t)=U(ξ)andξ=kx−wt. | (2.3) |
And we also introduce a novel variables for Eq (2.2)
F(x,t)=12log(v(x,t)). | (2.4) |
By utilizing traveling wave solution in Eq (2.2), the transformed ODE is given as
h(ξ)(w2−k2)h″(ξ)+(k2−w2)h′(ξ)2+(2δ−1)h(ξ)2+qh(ξ)3=0, | (2.5) |
where v(x,t)=ψ(ξ) and ψ(ξ)=1h(ξ).
The detail description of the proposed technique "SSEM" is given in this section.
Step 1: Consider the following structure showcase the NLEE for
M(F,Ft,Fx,Fxx,Ftt,...)=0. | (3.1) |
The traveling wave transformation F(x,t)=U(ξ), where ξ=kx−wt is used for converting Eq (3.1) into the following structure:
F=(h,h′,h″,h‴,...)=0. | (3.2) |
Step 2: The solution of Eq (3.2) has the following form:
h(ξ)=N∑i=0qiVi(ξ), | (3.3) |
here, qi(i=0,1,2,3,...,N) are unknown constants to be resolved. Considering following auxiliary equation:
V′(ξ)=√r+aV(ξ)2+bV(ξ)4, | (3.4) |
here, r, a and b are constants and Eq (3.4) presents solution as
Case 1: If a>0 and r=0, then,
V±1(ξ)=±√−mnabsecmn(√aξ)(b<0),V±2(ξ)=±√mnabcscmn(√aξ)(b>0). |
Case 2: If a<0, b>0, and r=0, then,
V±3(ξ)=±√−mnabsecmn(√−aξ),V±4(ξ)=±√−mnabcscmn(√−aξ). |
Case 3: If a<0, b>0 and r=a24b, then,
V±5(ξ)=√−a2btanhmn(√−a2ξ),V±6(ξ)=√−a2bcothmn(√−a2ξ),V±7(ξ)=√−a2b(tanhmn(√−2aξ)±ι√mnsecmn(√−2aξ)),V±8(ξ)=√−a2b(cothmn(√−2aξ)±√mncscmn(√−2aξ)),V±9(ξ)=±√−a8b(tanhmn(√−a8ξ)+cothmn(√−a8ξ)). |
Case 4: If a>0, b>0 and r=a24b, then,
V±10(ξ)=√a2btanmn(√a2ξ),V±11(ξ)=√a2bcotmn(√a2ξ). |
V±12(ξ)=√a2b(tanmn(√2aξ)±√mnsecmn(√2aξ)),V±13(ξ)=√a2b(cotmn(√2aξ)±√mncscmn(√2aξ)),V±14(ξ)=√a8b(tanmn(√a8ξ)+cotmn(√a8ξ)). |
secmn(ξ), tanhmn(ξ), tanmn(ξ), cotmn(ξ) etc. are generalized trigonometric and hyperbolic functions with parameters m and n. Upon m=n=1, they become known trigonometric and hyperbolic functions.
Step 3: N is determined by homogeneous balance approach.
Step 4: A polynomial in Vi can be achieved by inserting Eq (3.3) into Eq (3.2). Associating every terms of similar power and relating them to zero to get algebraic equations. We obtain the values of unknowns by solving the obtained system.
In this section, we obtain new closed form solutions with the application of the Sardar sub-equation method to GDSGE. Considering the ODE Eq (2.5). The assumed solution via Sardar sub-equation method takes the form
h(ξ)=q0+q1V, | (4.1) |
where q0 and q1 are constants to be determined. Next, using Eq (4.1) into Eq (2.1), and employing the proposed method. Distinctive kind of solutions are obtained.
Set 1:
q0=0,q1=0,q2=2b(k−w)(k+w)q,δ=12,r=0, |
and
Set 2:
q0=a(k−w)(k+w)q,q1=0,q2=2b(k−w)(k+w)q,δ=12,r=a24b. |
Utilizing values of parameters given by Set 1, for the solution of the proposed model Eq (2.1) becomes
Case 1: If a>0, and r=0, then,
F1(x,t)=12log(q2amn(w2−k2)sech2(√a(kx−wt)))(b<0)F2(x,t)=12log(q2amn(k2−w2)csch2(√a(kx−wt)))(b>0). |
Case 2: If a<0, b>0, and r=0, then,
F3(x,t)=12log(q2amn(w2−k2)sec2(√−a(kx−wt))),F4(x,t)=12log(q2amn(w2−k2)csc2(√−a(kx−wt))). |
Utilizing values of parameters given by Set 2, for the solution of the proposed model Eq (2.1) becomes
Case 3: If a<0, b>0 and r=a24b, then,
F5(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)(1−tanh2(√−a(kx−wt)√2))),F6(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)(1−coth2(√−a(kx−wt)√2))),F7(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)sec2(√2√a(kx−wt))(−2i√mnsinh(√2√−a(kx−wt))+mn+1)),F8(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)csc2(√2√a(kx−wt))(2√mncos(√2√a(kx−wt))+mn+1)),F9(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)csc2(√a(kx−wt)√2)). |
Case 4: If a>0, b>0 and r=a24b, then,
F10(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)(1+tan2(√a(kx−wt)√2))),F11(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)csc2(√a(kx−wt)√2)). |
F12(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)sec2(√2√a(kx−wt))(2√mnsin(√2√a(kx−wt))+mn+1)),F13(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)csc2(√2√a(kx−wt))(2√mncos(√2√a(kx−wt))+mn+1)),F14(x,t)=12log(qa(k2−w2)(csc2(√a(kx−wt)√2)+1)). |
This section is based on providing the description of SGEM. First of all the traveling wave transformation F(x,t)=q(ξ),ξ=x−wt is used to convert the sine-Gordon equation
Fxx−Ftt=u2sin(F), | (5.1) |
into
q″=u21−w2sin(q). | (5.2) |
The above second order ODE is converted into first order ODE by once integrating it and taking the constant of integration to be zero as
(q2)′=u21−w2sin2(q2). | (5.3) |
Assume that q2=l and m=√u21−w2=1, the above equation becomes
l′=sin(l). | (5.4) |
Equation (5.4) possesses the following solutions:
sinl=sin(l(ξ))=2jeξj2e2ξ+1|j=1=sec(ξ), | (5.5) |
cosl=cos(l(ξ))=j2e2ξ−1j2e2ξ+1|j=1=tanh(ξ). | (5.6) |
Assumed solution of Eq (5.2) can takes the form
q(ξ)=N∑i=1tanhi−1(ξ)[Bisec(ξ)+Aitanh(ξ)]+A0. | (5.7) |
Using Eqs (5.5) and (5.6), the above equation becomes
q(l)=N∑i=1cosi−1(l)[Bisin(l)+Aicos(l)]+A0. | (5.8) |
Inserting Eq (5.8) into ODE. Construct system of equations by equating powers of sin(l)cos(l) to zero. The values A0, Ai, Bi can be determined by solving the obtained system of equations.
This section is devoted to obtain new closed form solutions with the application of the sine-Gordon expansion method to the proposed model. According to SGEM, the solution of Eq (2.5) becomes
h(ϑ)=A2cos2(w)+A1cos(w)+A0+B1sin(w)+B2sin(w)cos(w). | (6.1) |
Using the solution procedure as in explained Section 5, the values of unknowns A0, A1, B1 are calculated, as
Set 3:
A0=2(w2−k2)q,A2=2(k2−w2)q,B1=0,A1=0,B2=0,δ=12. |
Solutions corresponding to Set 3 have been obtained as
F15(x,t)=12log(q2(w2−k2)sec2(kx−wt)). |
Set 4:
A0=w2−k2q,A2=k2−w2q,B1=0,A1=0,B2=−ιk2−w2q,δ=12. |
Solutions corresponding to Set 3 have been obtained as
F16(x,t)=12log(q2(k2−w2)(tanh2(kx−wt)−1−ιtanh(kx−wt)sec(kx−wt))). |
The generalized q-deformed sinh Gordon equation (GDSGE) is the significant nonlinear PDE that has great importance and applications in mathematics and physics. This paper is devoted to investigate the mathematical and physical properties of proposed model, by finding solutions using two analytical approaches: SSEM and SGEM. The proposed methods extract a wide range of solitons, including bright, singular, dark, combination dark-singular, combined dark-bright, and periodic singular solitons. The fundamental property of Soliton solutions is that they maintain their shape and energy while propagating over large distances and transfer data through an optical fiber without losing an information. To understand the physical behavior, few of the obtained solutions are plotted. The 2D and 3D visualizations are generated, by taking precise values for parameters, using mathematical software, Mathematica 12. Each figure include two subgraphs in which (a) and (b) depict 3D and 2D graph, respectively. Few obtained solutions such as F1(x,t),F2(x,t),F3(x,t),F5(x,t),F6(x,t),F9(x,t),F10(x) and F15(x,t) are plotted by selecting suitable values of arbitrary parameters satisfying the constraint conditions of suggested methods. Figures 1–7 are the graphical visualization of solutions obtained by SSEM while Figure 8 is graphical view of F15(x,t) acquired by SGEM. On comparing our finding with [34,35,36], it has been found that the results obtained in this paper using suggested methods are new and have not been reported earlier in literature.
Figure 1 depicts the graphical illustration of F1(x,t) by taking values of parameters as m=n=a=k=1, w=2 and q=0.5. Figure 1(a) represents the 3D surface plot and Figure 1(b) depicts the line plot of F1(x,t). Figure 2 depicts the graphical illustration of F2(x,t) by taking values of parameters as m=n=a=w=1, k=2 and q=0.5. Figure 2(a) represents the 3D surface plot and Figure 2(b) depicts the line plot of F2(x,t). Figure 3 depicts the graphical illustration of periodic solution F3(x,t) by taking values of parameters as m=n=w=1, a=−1, k=2 and q=0.5. Figure 3(a) represents the 3D surface plot and Figure 3(b) depicts the line plot of F3(x,t). Figure 4 depicts the graphical illustration of F5(x,t) by taking values of parameters as m=n=k=1, a=−1, w=2 and q=0.5. Figure 4(a) represents the 3D surface plot and Figure 4(b) depicts the line plot of F5(x,t). Figure 5 depicts the graphical illustration of singular soliton solution F6(x,t) by taking values of parameters as m=n=w=1, a=−1k=2 and q=0.5. Figure 6 depicts the graphical illustration of singular soliton solution F9(x,t) by taking values of parameters as m=n=k=b=1, a=−1w=2 and q=0.5. Figure 7 depicts the graphical illustration of periodic solution F10(x,t) by taking values of parameters as m=n=w=1, a=−1k=2 and q=0.5. Figure 8 depicts the graphical illustration of bright soliton F15(x,t) by taking values of parameters as w=2, k=1 and q=0.2.
In this portion, we are interested to analyze the dynamic nature of Eq (2.2). We obtain the following planar system by allowing h′=y,
{dhdξ=y,dydξ=2(κ2−ω2)y2+2(2δ−1)h2+2qh3h(κ2−ω2), | (8.1) |
which is not a Hamiltonian system. The chain rule can be used to rewrite (8.1),
dy2dh=2y2h+2σ1h2+2σ2h, | (8.2) |
where σ1=qκ2−ω2, σ2=2δ−1κ2−ω2. Next, we present the solution of (8.2):
y2=ch2+2σ2h2ln(h)+2σ1h3, | (8.3) |
where c is the constant of integration, we obtain
H(h,y)=y2−(ch2+2σ2h2ln(h)+2σ1h3)=0, | (8.4) |
which is Hamiltonian. The potential energy for Eq (8.4) is
L(y)=−(ch2+2σ2h2ln(h)+2σ1h3)=0, | (8.5) |
by taking the derivative of (8.5); after some modifications, we have
L′(y)=−(2ch+2σ2h+4σ2hln(h)+6σ1h2). | (8.6) |
By applying the taylor expansion of ln(h) around y=0, ignoring higher terms, yields
L′(Y)=ρ1h+ρ2h2, | (8.7) |
where ρ1=−2(c+3σ2), ρ2=2(3σ1+2σ2). Hence, the required planar system is
{dhdξ=y,dydξ=ρ1h+ρ2h2. | (8.8) |
In this study, our focus is on analyzing the chaotic nature of a dynamical system. In the upcoming subsection, we will delve into the examination of the suggested model's periodic, quasi-periodic, and chaotic behaviors.
In this section, we will explore the chaotic patterns displayed by Eq (2.2). While previous research, as documented in [36], has extensively examined the chaotic phenomena associated with Eq (2.1), the chaotic behavior of Eq (2.2) remains unexplored in the existing literature. To explore these patterns, we intend to introduce a external θ0cos(Λξ) into the system (8.8). Here, θ0 represents the intensity, and Λ denotes the frequency of this perturbed term. Consequently, the modified system can be expressed as follows:
{dhdξ=y,dydξ=ρ1h+ρ2h2+θ0cos(F),dFdξ=Λ, | (8.9) |
where F=Λξ. The quasi-periodic and chaotic characteristics have been examined of the system (8.9) utilizing various tools, including 3D and 2D phase plots, and time plots. Various random values for physical parameters are tested to discern the dynamical behaviors of the disturbed system. We will explore the implications of altering both θ0 and Λ, with the remaining parameters held constant as ρ1=−3.5, and ρ2=−1.
∙ Figure 9 presents phase plots and time series graphs for θ0=0.6 and Λ=0.5. In this instance, where both the intensity and frequency of the external force are minimal, the system (8.9) demonstrates periodic behavior.
∙ Figure 10 displays the 3D plot, 2D plot, and time analysis graph while incrementing the intensity with θ0=1.6 and frequency Λ=2.5. It is observed that the disturbed system (8.9) with modifications demonstrates quasi-periodic characteristic.
∙ In Figure 11, we depict 3D and 2D phase images, and perform time analysis for specific parameter values: θ0=3.6, and Λ=2π. The observed results indicate that variations in these parameters lead to the manifestation of a quasi-periodic chaotic pattern in system (8.9).
∙ Figure 12 illustrates the examination of changing amplitude and frequency when θ0=5.6, and Λ=2π. The results indicate the manifestation of chaotic phenomena in the modified system.
Representation of system (8.9) through Lyapunov exponent is explored in Figure 13.
The proposed model "GDSGE" is a nonlinear partial differential equation that demonstrates the propagation of optical solitons in the framework of quantum deformations. In this paper, we have applied two effective and powerful methods to obtain exact solutions for this equation. We have produced a variety of solutions, including singular, periodic, combination, bright, and dark solitons, and visually demonstrated their characteristics in Section 7. We additionally compared our outcomes with certain current approaches and displayed the strengths as well as efficiency of the Sardar sub-equation method followed by the sine-Gordon expansion method. It has been observed that the SSEM yields more general and distinct solutions compared to the SGEM, while the latter can yield some elegant and simple solutions that the former is unable to produce. We additionally noticed that the deformation parameter q performs an essential part in the structure, amplitude, and frequency that characterize the soliton solutions and that the soliton solutions demonstrate a few fascinating characteristics, such as the presence of a critical value of q that divides two different structures of soliton propagation, and an appearance of new types of solutions, like as q-breathers and q-periodic solutions. GDSGE has prospective uses in many fields of physics, including quantum gravity, quantum field theory, as well as quantum optics, and the exact solutions generated in this paper may be advantageous in subsequent scientific and mathematical investigations.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This work was supported by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2024R157), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This study was supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number (PSAU/2024/R/1445). The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at University of Bisha for supporting this work through the Fast-Track Research Support Program.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
J. Han, From pid to active disturbance rejection control, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 56 (2009), 900–906. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621
![]() |
[2] |
H. Ríos, E. Punta, L. Fridman, Fault detection and isolation for nonlinear non-affine uncertain systems via sliding-mode techniques, Int. J. Control, 90 (2017), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2016.1173727 doi: 10.1080/00207179.2016.1173727
![]() |
[3] |
C. Vázquez, S. Aranovskiy, L. B. Freidovich, L. M. Fridman, Time-varying gain differentiator: A mobile hydraulic system case study, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 24 (2016), 1740–1750. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2015.2512880 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2015.2512880
![]() |
[4] | W. Ji, D. Lv, S. Luo, Y. Sun, Multiple models-based fault tolerant control of levitation module of maglev vehicles against partial actuator failures, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2024 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3399235 |
[5] | H. Zhang, G. Xiao, Y. Xie, W. Guo, C. Zhai, Tracking Differentiator Algorithms, Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9384-0 |
[6] |
R. P. Borase, D. Maghade, S. Sondkar, S. Pawar, A review of pid control, tuning methods and applications, Int. J. Dyn. Control, 9 (2021), 818–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-020-00665-4 doi: 10.1007/s40435-020-00665-4
![]() |
[7] |
H. Zhang, G. Xiao, Y. Xie, W. Guo, C. Zhai, H. Zhang, et al., Tracking differentiators in real-life engineering, in Tracking Differentiator Algorithms. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 717 (2021), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9384-0_7 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9384-0_7
![]() |
[8] |
H. Feng, S. Li, A tracking differentiator based on taylor expansion, Appl. Math. Lett., 26 (2013), 735–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2013.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2013.02.003
![]() |
[9] | H. Wu, J. Huang, Control of induction motor drive based on adrc and inertia estimation, in 2019 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (IEMDC), IEEE, (2019), 1607–1612. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMDC.2019.8785393 |
[10] |
A. Levant, X. Yu, Sliding-mode-based differentiation and filtering, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 63 (2018), 3061–3067. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2018.2797218 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2018.2797218
![]() |
[11] |
A. Levant, M. Livne, X. Yu, Sliding-mode-based differentiation and its application, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50 (2017), 1699–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.495 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.495
![]() |
[12] |
W. Bai, W. Xue, Y. Huang, H. Fang, On extended state based kalman filter design for a class of nonlinear time-varying uncertain systems, Sci. China Inf. Sci., 61 (2018), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9242-8 doi: 10.1007/s11432-017-9242-8
![]() |
[13] |
J. Yu, S. Jin, Sliding mode tracking differentiator with adaptive gains for filtering and derivative estimation of noisy signals, IEEE Access, 9 (2021), 86017–86024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088544 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088544
![]() |
[14] | Y. Liu, L. Hao, Adaptive tracking differentiator control for nonlinear stochastic systems, in 2022 13th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), (2022), 512–517. https://doi.org/10.23919/ASCC56756.2022.9828327 |
[15] |
H. Zhang, Y. Xie, G. Xiao, C. Zhai, Z. Long, A simple discrete-time tracking differentiator and its application to speed and position detection system for a maglev train, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 27 (2018), 1728–1734. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2018.2832139 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2018.2832139
![]() |
[16] | X. Wang, S. Jin, High-order sliding mode tracking differentiator with neural network based adaptive parameter estimation, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2613 (2023), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2613/1/012013 |
[17] | Y. Feng, Z. Li, Y. Liu, Z. He, H. Li, Differentiator-based adaptive h∞ tracking control of fully actuated systems, in 2024 3rd Conference on Fully Actuated System Theory and Applications (FASTA), IEEE, (2024), 680–684. https://doi.org/10.1109/FASTA61401.2024.10595180 |
[18] |
A. M. Dabroom, H. K. Khalil, Output feedback sampled-data control of nonlinear systems using high-gain observers, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 46 (2001), 1712–1725. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.964682 doi: 10.1109/9.964682
![]() |
[19] |
X. Wang, Z. Chen, Z. Yuan, Design and analysis for new discrete tracking-differentiators, Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ., 18 (2003), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-003-0027-0 doi: 10.1007/s11766-003-0027-0
![]() |
[20] |
A. Levant, Robust exact differentiation via sliding mode technique, Automatica, 34 (1998), 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00209-4 doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00209-4
![]() |
[21] |
A. Abdessameud, A. Tayebi, Global trajectory tracking control of vtol-uavs without linear velocity measurements, Automatica, 46 (2010), 1053–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.03.010 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2010.03.010
![]() |
[22] |
L. Zhang, Z. Zhang, L. Huang, Hybrid non-linear differentiator design for a permanent-electro magnetic suspension maglev system, IET Signal Process., 6 (2012), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-spr.2011.0264 doi: 10.1049/iet-spr.2011.0264
![]() |
[23] |
J. Han, L. Yuan, The discrete form of tracking-differentiator, J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci., 19 (1999), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.12341/jssms09882 doi: 10.12341/jssms09882
![]() |
[24] | Z. Gao, On discrete time optimal control: A closed-form solution, in Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, IEEE, 1 (2004), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2004.1383578 |
[25] | Z. Lu, S. Bai, M. Jiang, Y. Xu, F. Liu, Improved design of linear self-turbulent permanent magnet synchronous motor speed controller, J. Electron. Meas. Instrum., 36 (2023), 73–81. |
[26] |
Z. Hao, Y. Yang, Y. Gong, Z. Hao, C. Zhang, H. Song, et al., Linear/nonlinear active disturbance rejection switching control for permanent magnet synchronous motors, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 36 (2021), 9334–9347. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2021.3055143 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3055143
![]() |
[27] |
J. Li, H. Ren, Y. Zhong, Robust speed control of induction motor drives using first-order auto-disturbance rejection controllers, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 51 (2014), 712–720. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2014.2330062 doi: 10.1109/TIA.2014.2330062
![]() |
[28] |
H. Zhang, G. Xiao, X. Yu, Y. Xie, On convergence performance of discrete-time optimal control based tracking differentiator, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 68 (2020), 3359–3369. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2020.2979530 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.2979530
![]() |
[29] |
L. Zhao, H. Cheng, J. Zhang, Y. Xia, Angle attitude control for a 2-dof parallel mechanism of pmas using tracking differentiators, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 66 (2018), 8659–8669. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2884215 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2884215
![]() |
[30] |
Y. Xie, Y. Li, L. She, P. Cui, C. Dai, A discrete second-order nonlinear tracking-differentiator based on boundary characteristic curves, Inf. Control, 43 (2014), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1219.2014.00257 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1219.2014.00257
![]() |
[31] |
Y. Xie, Y. Li, Z. Long, C. Dai, Discrete second-order nonlinear tracking-differentiator based on boundary characteristic curves and variable characteristic points and its application to velocity and position detection system, Acta Autom. Sin., 40 (2014), 952–964. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1004.2014.00952 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2014.00952
![]() |
[32] |
H. Zhang, Y. Xie, G. Xiao, C. Zhai, Z. Long, A simple discrete-time tracking differentiator and its application to speed and position detection system for a maglev train, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 27 (2019), 1728–1734. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2018.2832139 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2018.2832139
![]() |
[33] | M. Athans, P. L. Falb, Optimal Control: An Introduction to the Theory and Its Applications, Courier Corporation, 2007. |
[34] | D. E. Kirk, Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction, Courier Corporation, 2004. |
[35] |
J. Sun, K. Hang, Analysis and synthesis of time-optimal control systems, IFAC Proc. Volumes, 1 (1963), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)69673-3 doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)69673-3
![]() |
[36] |
X. Wang, Rapid-convergent nonlinear differentiator, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 28 (2012), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.09.026 doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.09.026
![]() |
[37] |
W. Chen, J. Yang, L. Guo, S. Li, Disturbance-observer-based control and related methods–-an overview, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 63 (2015), 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2478397 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2478397
![]() |
1. | Awad A. Bakery, OM Kalthum S. K. Mohamed, Ewa Pawluszewicz, Kannan Contraction Maps on the Space of Null Variable Exponent Second-Order Quantum Backward Difference Sequences of Fuzzy Functions and Its Pre-Quasi Ideal, 2022, 2022, 1607-887X, 1, 10.1155/2022/5339667 | |
2. | Juan-José Miñana, Alexander Šostak, Oscar Valero, On metrization of fuzzy metrics and application to fixed point theory, 2023, 468, 01650114, 108625, 10.1016/j.fss.2023.108625 |