Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Random periodic sequence of globally mean-square exponentially stable discrete-time stochastic genetic regulatory networks with discrete spatial diffusions


  • This paper regards the dual effects of discrete-space and discrete-time in stochastic genetic regulatory networks via exponential Euler difference and central finite difference. Firstly, the global exponential stability of such discrete networks is investigated by using discrete constant variation formulation. In particular, the optimal exponential convergence rate is explored by solving a nonlinear optimization problem under nonlinear constraints, and an implementable computer algorithm for computing the optimal exponential convergence rate is given. Secondly, random periodic sequence for such discrete networks is investigated based on the theory of semi-flow and metric dynamical systems. The researching findings show that the spatial diffusions with nonnegative intensive coefficients have no influence on global mean square boundedness and stability, random periodicity of the networks. This paper is pioneering in considering discrete spatial diffusions, which provides a research basis for future research on genetic regulatory networks.

    Citation: Bin Wang. Random periodic sequence of globally mean-square exponentially stable discrete-time stochastic genetic regulatory networks with discrete spatial diffusions[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(6): 3097-3122. doi: 10.3934/era.2023157

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ruifang Yang, Shilin Yang . Representations of a non-pointed Hopf algebra. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10523-10539. doi: 10.3934/math.2021611
    [2] Fengxia Gao, Jialei Chen . Conjugacy classes of left ideals of Sweedler's four-dimensional algebra $ H_{4} $. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7720-7727. doi: 10.3934/math.2022433
    [3] Haijun Cao, Fang Xiao . The category of affine algebraic regular monoids. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2666-2679. doi: 10.3934/math.2022150
    [4] Yaguo Guo, Shilin Yang . Projective class rings of a kind of category of Yetter-Drinfeld modules. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10997-11014. doi: 10.3934/math.2023557
    [5] Faiza Shujat, Faarie Alharbi, Abu Zaid Ansari . Weak $ (p, q) $-Jordan centralizer and derivation on rings and algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8322-8330. doi: 10.3934/math.2025383
    [6] Mingze Zhao, Huilan Li . A pair of dual Hopf algebras on permutations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5106-5123. doi: 10.3934/math.2021302
    [7] Panpan Jia, Jizhu Nan, Yongsheng Ma . Separating invariants for certain representations of the elementary Abelian $ p $-groups of rank two. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25603-25618. doi: 10.3934/math.20241250
    [8] Zehra Velioǧlu, Mukaddes Balçik . On the Tame automorphisms of differential polynomial algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3547-3555. doi: 10.3934/math.2020230
    [9] Qining Li . Double Ore extensions of anti-angle type for Hopf algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12566-12586. doi: 10.3934/math.2022696
    [10] Simone Costa, Marco Pavone . Orthogonal and oriented Fano planes, triangular embeddings of $ K_7, $ and geometrical representations of the Frobenius group $ F_{21} $. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35274-35292. doi: 10.3934/math.20241676
  • This paper regards the dual effects of discrete-space and discrete-time in stochastic genetic regulatory networks via exponential Euler difference and central finite difference. Firstly, the global exponential stability of such discrete networks is investigated by using discrete constant variation formulation. In particular, the optimal exponential convergence rate is explored by solving a nonlinear optimization problem under nonlinear constraints, and an implementable computer algorithm for computing the optimal exponential convergence rate is given. Secondly, random periodic sequence for such discrete networks is investigated based on the theory of semi-flow and metric dynamical systems. The researching findings show that the spatial diffusions with nonnegative intensive coefficients have no influence on global mean square boundedness and stability, random periodicity of the networks. This paper is pioneering in considering discrete spatial diffusions, which provides a research basis for future research on genetic regulatory networks.



    In [12,Definition 11.2] and [18,p. 134,Theorem A], the second kind Bell polynomials Bn,k for nk0 are defined by

    Bn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)=Nnk+10n!nk+1i=1i!nk+1i=1(xii!)i,

    where N0={0}N, the sum is taken over =(1,2,,nk+1) with iN0 satisfying nk+1i=1i=k and nk+1i=1ii=n. This kind of polynomials are very important in combinatorics, analysis, and the like. See the review and survey article [53] and closely related references therein.

    In [36,pp. 13–15], when studying Grothendieck's inequality and completely correlation-preserving functions, Oertel obtained the interesting identity

    2nk=1(1)k(2n+k)!k!B2n,k(0,16,0,340,0,5112,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]2(2nk+2)!)=(1)n

    for nN, where

    Bn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)=k!n!Bn,k(1!x1,2!x2,,(nk+1)!xnk+1). (1.1)

    In [36,p. 15], Oertel wrote that "However, already in this case we don't know a closed form expression for the numbers

    B2n,k(0,16,0,340,0,5112,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]2(2nk+2)!). (1.2)

    An even stronger problem appears in the complex case, since already a closed-form formula for the coefficients of the Taylor series of the inverse of the Haagerup function is still unknown''.

    By virtue of the relation (1.1), we see that, to find a closed-form formula for the sequence (1.2), it suffices to discover a closed-form formula for

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2). (1.3)

    In this paper, one of our aims is to derive closed-form formulas for the sequence (1.3). The first main result can be stated as the following theorem.

    Theorem 1.1. For k,n0, mN, and xmC, we have

    B2n+1,k(0,x2,0,x4,,1+(1)k2x2nk+2)=0. (1.4)

    For k,nN, we have

    B2n,2k1(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,0,[(2n2k+1)!!]22n2k+3)=22n(2k1)![kp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)k1p=1(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)]

    and

    B2n,2k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,[(2n2k1)!!]22n2k+1,0)=22n(2k)![kp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)kp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)],

    where s(n,k), which can be generated by

    xn=nm=0s(n,m)xm, (1.5)

    denote the first kind Stirling numbers and

    T(r;q,j;ρ)=(1)q[rm=q(ρ)ms(r,m)(mq)][rm=jq(ρ)ms(r,m)(mjq)]. (1.6)

    In Section 2, for proving Theorem 1.1, we will establish two general expressions for power series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 respectively.

    In Section 3, with the aid of general expressions for power series expansions of the functions (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 established in Section 2, we will prove Theorem 1.1 in details.

    In Section 4, basing on arguments in [20,p. 308] and [28,Section 2.4] and utilizing general expressions for power series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 established in Section 2, we will derive series representations of generalized logsine functions which were originally introduced in [34] and have been investigating actively, deeply, and systematically by mathematicians [9,10,14,15,16,17,29,30,31,37,38,57] and physicists [3,19,20,28].

    Finally, in Section 5, we will list several remarks on our main results and related stuffs.

    To prove Theorem 1.1, we need to establish the following general expressions of the power series expansions of (arcsinx) for N.

    Theorem 2.1. For N and |x|<1, the functions (arcsinx) can be expanded into power series

    (arcsinx)21=(4)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+2121) (2.1)

    or

    (arcsinx)2=(1)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+22), (2.2)

    where s(n,k) denotes the first kind Stirling numbers generated in (1.5) and T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6).

    Proof. In [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [7,p. 3], [20,p. 308], and [28,pp. 49–50], it was stated that the generating expression for the series expansion of (arcsinx)n with nN is

    exp(tarcsinx)==0b(t)x!,

    where b0(t)=1, b1(t)=t, and

    b2(t)=1k=0[t2+(2k)2],b2+1(t)=tk=1[t2+(2k1)2]

    for N. This means that, when writing

    b(t)=k=0β,ktk,0,

    where β0,0=1, β2,0=0, β2,2k+1=0, and β21,2k=0 for k0 and 1, we have

    =0(arcsinx)t!==0x!k=0β,ktk=k=0=kx!β,ktk==0[m=βm,xmm!]t.

    Equating coefficients of t gives

    (arcsinx)=!m=βm,xmm!=!n=0βn+,xn+(n+)!,N. (2.3)

    It is not difficult to see that

    b2(t)=41t2(1it2)1(1+it2)1andb2+1(t)=4t(12it2)(12+it2),

    where i=1 is the imaginary unit and

    (z)n=n1=0(z+)={z(z+1)(z+n1),n11,n=0

    is called the rising factorial of zC, while

    zn=n1=0(z)={z(z1)(zn+1),n11,n=0 (2.4)

    is called the falling factorial of zC. Making use of the relation

    (z)n=(1)nznorzn=(1)n(z)n

    in [52,p. 167], we acquire

    b2(t)=41t2it211it211andb2+1(t)=4tit212it212.

    Utilizing the relation (1.5) in [59,p. 19,(1.26)], we obtain

    b2(t)=41t21m=0s(1,m)2m(it2)m1m=0(1)ms(1,m)2m(it+2)m=41t21m=0s(1,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk(2)mk1m=0(1)ms(1,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk2mk=41t21m=0(1)ms(1,m)mk=0(1)k2k(mk)iktk1m=0(1)ms(1,m)mk=012k(mk)iktk=41t21k=0[1m=k(1)m+ks(1,m)2k(mk)]iktk1k=0[1m=k(1)ms(1,m)2k(mk)]iktk=41t22(1)k=0kq=0[1m=q(1)m+qs(1,m)2q(mq)1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)2kq(mkq)]iktk=41t22(1)k=012kkq=0[1m=q(1)m+qs(1,m)(mq)1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)(mkq)]iktk=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0(1m=q(1)ms(1,m)(mq))1m=kq(1)ms(1,m)(mkq)]tk+2=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0T(1;q,k;1)]tk+2

    and

    b2+1(t)=4tm=0s(,m)2m(it1)mm=0(1)ms(,m)2m(it+1)m=4tm=0s(,m)2mmk=0(1)mk(mk)iktkm=0(1)ms(,m)2mmk=0(mk)iktk=4tk=0[m=k(1)ms(,m)2m(mk)](i)ktkk=0[m=k(1)ms(,m)2m(mk)]iktk=42k=0ik[kq=0(1)q(m=q(1)ms(,m)2m(mq))m=kq(1)ms(,m)2m(mkq)]tk+1=42k=0ik[kq=0T(;q,k;12)]tk+1.

    This means that

    2k=0β2,ktk=2(1)k=2β2,k+2tk+2=2(1)k=0β2,k+2tk+2=412(1)k=0ik2k[kq=0T(1;q,k;1)]tk+2

    and

    2+1k=0β2+1,ktk=2k=1β2+1,k+1tk+1=2k=0β2+1,k+1tk+1=42k=0ik[kq=0T(;q,k;12)]tk+1.

    Further equating coefficients of tk+2 and tk+1 respectively arrives at

    β2,k+2=41ik2kkq=0T(1;q,k;1)andβ2+1,k+1=4ikkq=0T(;q,k;12)

    for k0.

    Replacing by 21 for N in (2.3) leads to

    (arcsinx)21=(21)!n=0βn+21,21xn+21(n+21)!=(21)!n=0β2n+21,21x2n+21(2n+21)!=(21)!n=0[4n+1i2(1)2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+21)!=(1)141(21)!n=0[4n2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+21)!=(4)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+21(2n+2121).

    Replacing by 2 for N in (2.3) leads to

    (arcsinx)2=(2)!n=0βn+2,2xn+2(n+2)!=(2)!n=0β2n+2,2x2n+2(2n+2)!=(1)1(2)!n=0[4n2(1)q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+2)!=(1)1n=04n(2n)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]x2n+2(2n+22).

    The proof of Theorem 2.1 is complete.

    We now start out to prove Theorem 1.1.

    In the last line of [18,p. 133], there exists the formula

    1k!(m=1xmtmm!)k=n=kBn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1)tnn! (3.1)

    for k0. When taking x2m1=0 for mN, the left hand side of the formula (3.1) is even in t(,) for all k0. Therefore, the formula (1.4) is valid.

    Ones know that the power series expansion

    arcsint==0[(21)!!]2(2+1)!t2+1,|t|<1 (3.2)

    is valid, where (1)!!=1. This implies that

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2)=B2n,k((arcsint)|t=02,(arcsint)|t=03,(arcsint)(4)|t=04,,(arcsint)(2nk+2)|t=02nk+2).

    Employing the formula

    Bn,k(x22,x33,,xnk+2nk+2)=n!(n+k)!Bn+k,k(0,x2,x3,,xn+1)

    in [18,p. 136], we derive

    B2n,k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,1+(1)k+12[(2nk)!!]22nk+2)=(2n)!(2n+k)!B2n+k,k(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0).

    Making use of the formula (3.1) yields

    n=0Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)k!n!(n+k)!tn+kn!=(m=1xmtmm!)k,n=0Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)(n+kk)tn+kn!=(m=1xmtmm!)k,Bn+k,k(x1,x2,,xn+1)=(n+kk)limt0dndtn[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k,B2n+k,k(x1,x2,,x2n+1)=(2n+kk)limt0d2ndt2n[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k.

    Setting x1=0 and xm=(arcsint)(m)|t=0 for m2 gives

    d2ndt2n[m=0xm+1tm(m+1)!]k=d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]k=d2ndt2n(arcsinttt)k=d2ndt2nkp=0(1)kp(kp)(arcsintt)p=kp=1(1)kp(kp)d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p.

    Accordingly, we obtain

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k1=2k1p=1(1)2kp1(2k1p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p=kp=1(2k12p1)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1k1p=1(2k12p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k=2kp=1(1)2kp(2kp)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)p=kp=1(2k2p)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2pkp=1(2k2p1)limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1.

    From the power series expansions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1, it follows that

    limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p1=(1)p14p1(2p1)!×limt0d2ndt2nj=0[4j2p2q=0T(j+p1;q,2p2;12)]t2j(2j+2p1)!=(1)p14n+p1(2n+2p12n)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n(arcsintt)2p=(1)p1(2p)!limt0d2ndt2nj=0[4j2p2q=0T(j+p1;q,2p2;1)]t2j(2j+2p)!=(1)p14n(2n+2p2n)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1).

    Therefore, we arrive at

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k1=4nkp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)4nk1p=1(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)

    and

    limt0d2ndt2n[1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!]2k=4nkp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)4nkp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12).

    Consequently, we acquire

    B2n,2k1(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,0,[(2n2k+1)!!]22n2k+3)=(2n)!(2n+2k1)!B2n+2k1,2k1(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0)=(2n)!(2n+2k1)!(2n+2k12k1)limt0d2ndt2n(1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!)2k1=1(2k1)![4nkp=1(4)p1(2k12p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)4nk1p=0(1)p1(2k12p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)]

    and

    B2n,2k(0,13,0,95,0,2257,,[(2n2k1)!!]22n2k+1,0)=(2n)!(2n+2k)!B2n+2k,2k(0,(arcsint)|t=0,(arcsint)|t=0,,(arcsint)(2n+1)|t=0)=(2n)!(2n+2k)!(2n+2k2k)limt0d2ndt2n(1tm=2(arcsint)(m)|t=0tmm!)2k=1(2k)![4nkp=1(1)p1(2k2p)(2n+2p2p)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;1)4nkp=1(4)p1(2k2p1)(2n+2p12p1)2p2q=0T(n+p1;q,2p2;12)].

    The proof of Theorem 1.1 is complete.

    The logsine function

    Lsj(θ)=θ0(ln|2sinx2|)j1dx

    and generalized logsine function

    Ls()j(θ)=θ0x(ln|2sinx2|)j1dx

    were introduced originally in [34,pp. 191–192], where ,j are integers, j+11, and θ is an arbitrary real number. There have been many papers such as [3,9,10,14,15,16,17,19,20,28,29,30,31,37,38,57] devoted to investigation and applications of the (generalized) logsine functions in mathematics, physics, engineering, and other mathematical sciences.

    Theorem 4.1. Let zn for zC and n{0}N denote the falling factorial defined by (2.4) and let T(r;q,j;ρ) be defined by (1.6). In the region 0<θπ and for j,N, generalized logsine functions Ls()j(θ) have the following series representations:

    1. for j2+13,

    Ls(21)j(θ)=θ22[ln(2sinθ2)]j2(1)(j2)(21)!(ln2)j1(2sinθ2ln2)2×n=0(2sinθ2)2n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(lnsinθ2ln2)α(j21α)αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]; (4.1)

    2. for j2+24,

    Ls(2)j(θ)=θ2+12+1[ln(2sinθ2)]j21+(1)(j21)(2)!(ln2)j12(4sinθ2ln2)2+1×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×[j22α=0(j22α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2+1)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]; (4.2)

    3. for j211,

    Ls(22)j(θ)=(1)243(22)!(ln2)j(sinθ2ln2)21×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+21)k+1(lnsinθ2)k; (4.3)

    4. for j211,

    Ls(21)j(θ)=(1)(21)!(ln2)j(2sinθ2ln2)2×n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k. (4.4)

    Proof. In [28,p. 49,Section 2.4], it was obtained that

    Ls(k)j(θ)=θk+1k+1[ln(2sinθ2)]jk1+2k+1(jk1)k+1sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)k+1lnjk2(2x)xdx (4.5)

    for 0<θπ and jk20. Making use of Theorem 2.1 and the formula

    xnlnmxdx=xn+1mk=0(1)kmklnmkx(n+1)k+1,m,n0 (4.6)

    in [22,p. 238,2.722], we acquire

    sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)2lnj21(2x)xdx=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]sin(θ/2)0x2n+21lnj21(2x)dx=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(ln2+lnx)j21dx]=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(j21α)(ln2)j2α1sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(lnx)αdx]=(1)1(2)!n=04n(2n+2)![22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(j21α)(ln2)j2α1(sinθ2)2n+2αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)αk]=(1)1(2)!(ln2)j21(sinθ2)2n=04n(2n+2)!(sinθ2)2n[22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×[j21α=0(lnsinθ2ln2)α(j21α)αk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]

    for j2+13. Substituting this result into (4.5) for k=21 yields (4.1).

    Similarly, by virtue of Theorem 2.1 and the formula (4.6), we also have

    sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)2+1lnj22(2x)xdx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]sin(θ/2)0x2n+2lnj22(2x)dx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×j22α=0(j22α)(ln2)j2α2sin(θ/2)0x2n+2(lnx)αdx=(1)4(2+1)!n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×j22α=0(j22α)(ln2)j2α2(sinθ2)2n+2+1αk=0(1)kαk(lnsinθ2)αk(2n+2+1)k+1=(1)4(2+1)!(sinθ2)2+1(ln2)j22n=0[4n(2n+2+1)!(sinθ2)2n2q=0T(n+;q,2;12)]×[j22α=0(j22α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2+1)k+1(lnsinθ2)k]

    for N and j2(+1)4. Substituting this result into (4.5) for k=2 yields (4.2).

    In [20,p. 308], it was derived that

    Ls(k)j(θ)=2k+1sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)k1x2lnjk1(2x)dx (4.7)

    for 0<θπ and jk+11. Differentiating with respect to x on both sides of the formulas (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1 results in

    (arcsinx)221x2=(1)141(22)!n=0[4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]x2n+22(2n+22)! (4.8)

    and

    (arcsinx)211x2=(1)1(21)!n=0[4n22q=0T(n+;q,2;1)]x2n+21(2n+21)! (4.9)

    for N. Substituting the power series expansions (4.8) and (4.9) into (4.7) and employing the indefinite integral (4.6) respectively reveal

    Ls(22)j(θ)=221sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)221x2lnj2+1(2x)dx=(1)243(22)!n=0[4n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×sin(θ/2)0x2n+22(ln2+lnx)j2+1dx=(1)243(22)!n=0[4n(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(ln2)j2α+1sin(θ/2)0x2n+22(lnx)αdx=(1)243(22)!(ln2)j(sinθ2ln2)21n=0[4n(2n+22)!(sinθ2)2n×22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(j2+1α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+21)k+1(lnsinθ2)k

    for j211 and

    Ls(21)j(θ)=22sin(θ/2)0(arcsinx)211x2lnj2(2x)dx=(1)22(21)!n=0[4n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×sin(θ/2)0x2n+21(ln2+lnx)j2dx=(1)22(21)!n=0[4n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(ln2)j2αsin(θ/2)0x2n+21(lnx)αdx=(1)(21)!(ln2)j(2sinθ2ln2)2n=0[(2sinθ2)2n(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(j2α)(lnsinθ2ln2)ααk=0(1)kαk(2n+2)k+1(lnsinθ2)k

    for j21. The series representations (4.3) and (4.4) are thus proved. The proof of Theorem 4.1 is complete.

    Finally, we list several remarks on our main results and related stuffs.

    Remark 5.1. For nk1, the first kind Stirling numbers s(n,k) can be explicitly computed by

    |s(n+1,k+1)|=n!n1=k11112=k112k21k1=21k1k11k=11k. (5.1)

    The formula (5.1) was derived in [41,Corollary 2.3] and can be reformulated as

    |s(n+1,k+1)|n!=nm=k|s(m,k)|m!

    for nk1. From the equation (1.5), by convention, we assume s(n,k)=0 for n<k and k,n<0. In recent years, the first kind Stirling numbers s(n,k) have been investigated in [39,40,41,42,45] and closely related references therein.

    Remark 5.2. For |x|<1, we have the following series expansions of arcsinx and its powers.

    1. The series expansion (3.2) of arcsinx can be rewritten as

    arcsinxx=1!n=0[(2n1)!!]2x2n(2n+1)!, (5.2)

    where (1)!!=1. Various forms of (5.2) can be found in [1,4.4.40] and [2,p. 121,6.41.1].

    2. The series expansion of (arcsinx)2 can be rearranged as

    (arcsinxx)2=2!n=0[(2n)!!]2x2n(2n+2)!. (5.3)

    The variants of (5.3) can be found in [2,p. 122,6.42.1], [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [5,pp. 50–51 and p. 287], [6,p. 384], [7,p. 2,(2.1)], [13,Lemma 2], [20,p. 308], [21,pp. 88-90], [22,p. 61,1.645], [32,p. 1011], [33,p. 453], [47,Section 6.3], [58], [60,p. 59,(2.56)], or [62,p. 676,(2.2)]. It is clear that the series expansion (5.3) and its equivalent forms have been rediscovered repeatedly. For more information on the history, dated back to 1899 or earlier, of the series expansion (5.3) and its equivalent forms, see [7,p. 2] and [32,p. 1011].

    3. The series expansion of (arcsinx)3 can be reformulated as

    (arcsinxx)3=3!n=0[(2n+1)!!]2[nk=01(2k+1)2]x2n(2n+3)!. (5.4)

    Different variants of (5.4) can be found in [2,p. 122,6.42.2], [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [11,p. 188,Example 1], [20,p. 308], [21,pp. 88–90], [22,p. 61,1.645], or [27,pp. 154–155,(832)].

    4. The series expansion of (arcsinx)4 can be restated as

    (arcsinxx)4=4!n=0[(2n+2)!!]2[nk=01(2k+2)2]x2n(2n+4)!. (5.5)

    There exist three variants of (5.5) in [4,pp. 262–263,Proposition 15], [7,p. 3,(2.2)], and [20,p. 309].

    5. Basing on the formula (2.21) in [28,p. 50], we concretely obtain

    (arcsinxx)5=5!2n=0[(2n+3)!!]2[(n+1k=01(2k+1)2)2n+1k=01(2k+1)4]x2n(2n+5)!. (5.6)

    6. In [7], the special series expansions

    (arcsinx2)2=12n=1x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)4=32n=1(n1m=11m2)x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)6=454n=1(n1m=11m2m1=112)x2n(2nn)n2,(arcsinx2)8=3152n=1(n1m=11m2m1=1121p=11p2)x2n(2nn)n2

    were listed. In general, it was obtained in [7,pp. 1–2] that

    (arcsinx2)2=(2)!n=1H(n)x2n(2nn)n2,N (5.7)

    and

    (arcsinx2)2+1=(2+1)!n=1G(n)(2nn)24n+1x2n+12n+1,{0}N, (5.8)

    where H1(n)=14, G0(n)=1,

    H+1(n)=14n1m1=11(2m1)2m11m2=11(2m2)2m11m=11(2m)2,

    and

    G(n)=n1m1=01(2m1+1)2m11m2=01(22+1)2m11m=01(2m+1)2.

    The convention is that the sum is zero if the starting index exceeds the finishing index.

    7. In [7,(2.9) and (4.3)], [25,p. 480,(88.2.2)], and [56,p. 124], there exist the formulas

    (arcsinxx)=n=0[(1k=1{nk1nk=0(2nk12nk)![(nk1nk)!]2(2nk12nk+1)122nk12nk})×(2n1)!(n1!)2(2n1+1)122n1]x2n (5.9)

    and

    (arcsinxx)=!n=0[nn1=0(2n1n1)2n1+1nn2=n1(2n22n1n2n1)2n2+2nn=n1(2n2n1nn1)2n+14n]xn. (5.10)

    All the power series expansions from (5.2) to (5.6) can also be deduced from Theorem 2.1.

    By the way, we notice that the quantity in the pair of bigger brackets, the coefficient of x2n, in the formula (5.9) has no explicit relation with n. This means that there must be some misprints and typos somewhere in the formula (5.9). On 30 January 2021, Christophe Vignat (Tulane University) pointed out that n0=n is the missing information in the formula (5.9).

    In [28,pp. 49–50,Section 2.4], the power series expansions of (arcsinx)k for 2k13 were concretely and explicitly written down in alternative forms. The main idea in the study of the power series expansions of (arcsinx)k for 2k13 was related with series representations for generalized logsine functions in [28,p. 50,(2.24) and (2.25)]. The special interest is special values of generalized logsine functions defined by [28,p. 50,(2.26) and (2.27)].

    In [54,Theorem 1.4] and [55,Theorem 2.1], the nth derivative of arcsinx was explicitly computed.

    In [43,44], three series expansions (5.2), (5.3), (5.4) and their first derivatives were used to derive known and new combinatorial identities and others.

    Because coefficients of x2n+21 and x2n+2 in (2.1) and (2.2) contain three times sums, coefficients of x2n and x2n+1 in (5.7) and (5.8) contain times sums, coefficients of x2n in (5.9) contain 1 times sums, and coefficients of xn in (5.10) contain times sums, we conclude that the series expansions (2.1) and (2.2) are more elegant, more operable, more computable, and more applicable.

    Remark 5.3. Two expressions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1 for series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2 are very close and similar to, but different from, each other. Is there a unified expression for series expansions of (arcsinx)21 and (arcsinx)2? If yes, two closed-form formulas for B2n,k in Theorem 1.1 would also be unified. We believe that the formula

    exp(2aarcsinx2)=n=0(ia)n/2(ia+1)n/2(ix)nn! (5.11)

    mentioned in [7,p. 3,(2.7)] and collected in [25,p. 210,(10.49.33)] would be useful for unifying two expressions (2.1) and (2.2) in Theorem 2.1, where extended Pochhammer symbols

    (ia)n/2=Γ(ia+n2)Γ(ia)and(ia+1)n/2=Γ(ia+1n2)Γ(ia+1) (5.12)

    were defined in [25,p. 5,Section 2.2.3], and the Euler gamma function Γ(z) is defined [59,Chapter 3] by

    Γ(z)=limnn!nznk=0(z+k),zC{0,1,2,}.

    What are closed forms and why do we care closed forms? Please read the paper [8].

    Remark 5.4. In [2,p. 122,6.42], [27,pp. 154–155,(834)], [33,p. 452,Theorem], and [47,Section 6.3,Theorem 21,Sections 8 and 9], it was proved or collected that

    arcsinx1x2=n=022n(n!)2x2n+1(2n+1)!,|x|1. (5.13)

    In [6,p. 385], [47,Theorem 24], and [61,p. 174,(10)], it was proved that

    n=1(2x)2n(2nn)=x21x2+xarcsinx(1x2)3/2,|x|<1. (5.14)

    These series expansions (5.13) and (5.14) can be derived directly from the series expansion for (arcsinx)2 and are a special case of (4.9) for =1.

    Remark 5.5. The series expansion of the function 1x2arcsinx was listed in [2,p. 122,6.42.4] which can be corrected and reformulated as

    1x2arcsinx=x1!n=1[(2n2)!!]2(2n)x2n+1(2n+1)!,|x|1. (5.15)

    Basing on the relation

    (1x2)[(arcsinx)]=1x2(arcsinx)1

    and utilizing series expansions of (arcsinx)3 and (arcsinx)4, after simple operations, we can readily derive

    1x2(arcsinx)2=x22!n=1[(2n1)!!]2[(2n+1)n1k=01(2k+1)21]x2n+2(2n+2)! (5.16)

    and

    1x2(arcsinx)3=x33!n=1[(2n)!!]2[(2n+2)n1k=01(2k+2)21]x2n+3(2n+3)!. (5.17)

    From (4.8) and (4.9), we can generalize the series expansions (5.15), (5.16), and (5.17) as

    1x2(arcsinx)22=x22+(1)141(22)!×n=1[A(,n)(2n+22)(2n+23)A(,n1)]x2n+22(2n+22)! (5.18)

    and

    1x2(arcsinx)21=x21+(1)1(21)!×n=1[B(,n)(2n+21)(2n+22)B(,n1)]x2n+21(2n+21)! (5.19)

    for N, where

    A(,n)=4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12),B(,n)=4n22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1),

    and T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6). Considering both coefficients of x22 and x21 in the power series expansions (5.18) and (5.19) must be 1, we acquire two combinatorial identities

    2q=0T(;q,2;12)=(1)4and2q=0T(;q,2;1)=(1)

    for {0}N, where T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6).

    Remark 5.6. Making use of Theorem 1.1, we readily obtain the first several values of the sequence (1.3) in Tables 1 and 2.

    Table 1.  The sequence B2n,2k1 in (1.3) for 1n,k8.
    B2n,2k1 k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 k=5 k=6 k=7 k=8
    n=1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=2 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=3 2257 59 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=4 1225 42 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=5 89302511 3951 359 0 0 0 0 0
    n=6 10805602513 25155245 1155 0 0 0 0 0
    n=7 1217431215 85621185 314314 500581 0 0 0 0
    n=8 410883035062517 18974980350 2847704863 1401403 0 0 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 2.  The sequence B2n,2k in (1.3) for 1n,k8.
    B2n,2k k=1 k=2 k=3 k=4 k=5 k=6 k=7 k=8
    n=1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=2 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=4 20675 3527 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=5 30525 210 0 0 0 0 0 0
    n=6 234839257 35211 38527 0 0 0 0 0
    n=7 516651345 10679068415 7007 0 0 0 0 0
    n=8 106480673775 88916832815 2892890 2502581 0 0 0 0

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the papers [46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55] and closely related references therein, the authors and their coauthors discovered and applied closed form expressions for many special values of the second kind Bell polynomials Bn,k(x1,x2,,xnk+1) for nk0.

    Remark 5.7. Taking θ=π3 in (4.3) and (4.4) give

    Ls(22)j(π3)=(1)(44)!!(ln2)j2+1n=0[1(2n+22)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;12)]×j2+1α=0(1)α(j2+1α)αk=0αk(2n+21)k+1(ln2)k

    and

    Ls(21)j(π3)=(1)(21)!(ln2)j2n=0[1(2n+21)!22q=0T(n+1;q,22;1)]×j2α=0(1)α(j2α)αk=0αk(2n+2)k+1(ln2)k

    for N, where zn for zC and n{0}N denotes the falling factorial defined by (2.4) and T(r;q,j;ρ) is defined by (1.6). In [28,p. 50], it was stated that the values Ls()j(π3) have been related to special interest in the calculation of the multiloop Feynman diagrams [19,20].

    Similarly, we can also deduce series representations for special values of the logsine function Ls()j(θ) at θ=π2, π4, π6 and θ=π. These special values were originally derived in [30,31,34] and also considered in [3,9,10,14,15,16,17,19,20,28,29,37,38,57] and closely related references therein.

    Remark 5.8. This paper is a revised version of electronic arXiv preprints [23,24].

    The authors thank

    1. Frank Oertel (Philosophy, Logic & Scientific Method Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; f.oertel@email.de) for his citing the paper [53] in his electronic preprint [35]. On 10 October 2020, this citation and the Google Scholar Alerts leaded the authors to notice the numbers (1.2) in [35]. On 26 January 2021, he sent the important paper [7] to the authors and others. We communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    2. Chao-Ping Chen (Henan Polytechnic University, China; chenchaoping@sohu.com) for his asking the combinatorial identity in [43,Theorem 2.2], or the one in [44,Theorem 2.1], via Tencent QQ on 18 December 2020. Since then, we communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    3. Mikhail Yu. Kalmykov (Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Russia; kalmykov.mikhail@googlemail.com) for his noticing [43,Remark 4.2] and providing the references [19,20,28,30,31,34] on 9 and 27 January 2021. We communicated and discussed with each other many times.

    4. Li Yin (Binzhou University, China; yinli7979@163.com) for his frequent communications and helpful discussions with the authors via Tencent QQ online.

    5. Christophe Vignat (Department of Physics, Universite d'Orsay, France; Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, USA; cvignat@tulane.edu) for his sending electronic version of those pages containing the formulas (5.9), (5.11), and (5.12) in [25,56] on 30 January 2021 and for his sending electronic version of the monograph [27] on 8 February 2021.

    6. Frédéric Ouimet (California Institute of Technology, USA; ouimetfr@caltech.edu) for his photocopying by Caltech Library Services and transferring via ResearchGate those two pages containing the formulas (5.9) and (5.11) on 2 February 2021.

    7. anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.

    The author Dongkyu Lim was partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea under Grant NRF-2021R1C1C1010902, Republic of Korea.

    All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.



    [1] M. Pasquini, D. Angeli, On convergence for hybrid models of gene regulatory networks under polytopic uncertainties: a Lyapunov approach, J. Math. Biol., 83 (2021), 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-021-01690-3 doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01690-3
    [2] N. Augier, A. G. Yabo, Time-optimal control of piecewise affine bistable gene-regulatory networks, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, (2022), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6012 doi: 10.1002/rnc.6012
    [3] E. Kim, I. Ivanov, E. R. Dougherty, Network classification based on reducibility with respect to the stability of canalizing power of genes in a gene regulatory network-a Boolean network modeling perspective, IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf., 19 (2022), 558–568. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2020.3005313 doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2020.3005313
    [4] T. Hillerton, D. Secilmi, S. Nelander, E. L. L. Sonnhammer, A. Valencia, Fast and accurate gene regulatory network inference by normalized least squares regression, Bioinformatics, 38 (2022), 2263–2268. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac103 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac103
    [5] I. Stamova, G. Stamov, Lyapunov approach for almost periodicity in impulsive gene regulatory networks of fractional order with time-varying delays, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040268 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5040268
    [6] N. Padmaja, P. Balasubramaniam, Mixed H-infinity/passivity based stability analysis of fractional-order gene regulatory networks with variable delays, Math. Comput. Simulat., 192 (2022), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.023 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.023
    [7] T. Stamov, I. Stamova, Design of impulsive controllers and impulsive control strategy for the Mittag-Leffler stability behavior of fractional gene regulatory networks, Neurocomputing, 424 (2021), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.112 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.112
    [8] Y. H. Qiao, H. Y. Yan, L. J. Duan, J. Miao, Finite-time synchronization of fractional-order gene regulatory networks with time delay, Neural Networks, 126 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.02.004
    [9] C. Aouiti, F. Dridi, Study of genetic regulatory networks with Stepanov-like pseudo-weighted almost automorphic coefficients, Neural Comput. Appl., 33 (2021), 10175–10187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05780-7 doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-05780-7
    [10] L. Duan, F. J. Di, Z. Y. Wang, Existence and global exponential stability of almost periodic solutions of genetic regulatory networks with time-varying delays, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell., 32 (2019), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2019.1652357 doi: 10.1080/0952813X.2019.1652357
    [11] Y. Wang, Z. Ma, J. Shen, Z. Liu, L. Chen, Periodic oscillation in delayed gene networks with SUM regulatory logic and small perturbations, Math. Biosci., 220 (2009), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2009.03.010 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.03.010
    [12] C. R. Feng, H. Z. Zhao, B. Zhou, Pathwise random periodic solutions of stochastic differential equations, J. Differ. Equations, 251 (2011), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2011.03.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2011.03.019
    [13] C. R. Feng, B. Y. Qu, H. Z. Zhao, Random quasi-periodic paths and quasi-periodic measures of stochastic differential equations, J. Differ. Equations, 286 (2021), 119–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2021.03.022 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2021.03.022
    [14] C. R. Feng, Y. Liu, H. Z. Zhao, Numerical approximation of random periodic solutions of stochastic differential equations, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 68 (2017), 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-017-0868-7 doi: 10.1007/s00033-017-0868-7
    [15] K. Uda, Random periodic solutions for a class of hybrid stochastic differential equations, Stochastics, 95 (2023), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442508.2022.2070019 doi: 10.1080/17442508.2022.2070019
    [16] A. Coulier, S. Hellander, A. Hellander, A multiscale compartment-based model of stochastic gene regulatory networks using hitting-time analysis, J. Chem. Phys., 154 (2021), 184105. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010764 doi: 10.1063/5.0010764
    [17] G. X. Xu, H. B. Bao, J. D. Cao, Mean-square exponential input-to-state stability of stochastic gene regulatory networks with multiple time delays, Neural Process. Lett., 51 (2020), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10087-9 doi: 10.1007/s11063-019-10087-9
    [18] S. Busenberg, J. Mahaffy, Interaction of spatial diffusion and delays in models of genetic control by repression, J. Math. Biol., 22 (1985), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276489 doi: 10.1007/BF00276489
    [19] Y. Xie, L. Xiao, M. F. Ge, L. Wang, G. Wang, New results on global exponential stability of genetic regulatory networks with diffusion effect and time-varying hybrid delays, Neural Process. Lett., 53 (2021), 3947–3963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10573-z doi: 10.1007/s11063-021-10573-z
    [20] L. Sun, J. Wang, X. Chen, K. Shi, H. Shen, H fuzzy state estimation for delayed genetic regulatory networks with random gain fluctuations and reaction-diffusion, J. Franklin I., 358 (2021), 8694–8714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.08.047 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.08.047
    [21] X. N. Song, M. Wang, S. Song, C. K. Ahn, Sampled-data state estimation of reaction diffusion genetic regulatory networks via space-dividing approaches, IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf., 18 (2021), 718–730. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2019.2919532 doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2019.2919532
    [22] C. Y. Zou, X. Y. Wang, Robust stability of delayed Markovian switching genetic regulatory networks with reaction–diffusion terms, Comput. Math. Appl., 79 (2020), 1150–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.08.024 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.08.024
    [23] X. Zhang, Y. Han, L. G. Wu, Y. Wang, State estimation for delayed genetic regulatory networks with reaction-diffusion terms, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 29 (2018), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2618899 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2618899
    [24] Y. Xue, C. Y. Liu, X. Zhang, State bounding description and reachable set estimation for discrete-time genetic regulatory networks with time-varying delays and bounded disturbances, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst., 52 (2022), 6652–6661. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3148715 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2022.3148715
    [25] S. Pandiselvi, R. Raja, Q. Zhu, G. Rajchakit, A state estimation H issue for discrete-time stochastic impulsive genetic regulatory networks in the presence of leakage, multiple delays and Markovian jumping parameters, J. Franklin I., 355 (2018), 2735–2761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.12.036 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.12.036
    [26] C. Y. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Xue, Global exponential stability analysis of discrete-time genetic regulatory networks with time-varying discrete delays and unbounded distributed delays, Neurocomputing, 372 (2020), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.09.047 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.09.047
    [27] D. Yue, Z. H. Guan, J. Chen, G. Ling, Y. Wu, Bifurcations and chaos of a discrete-time model in genetic regulatory networks, Nonlinear Dyn., 87 (2017), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3061-1 doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-3061-1
    [28] T. W. Zhang, Y. K. Li, Global exponential stability of discrete-time almost automorphic Caputo–Fabrizio BAM fuzzy neural networks via exponential Euler technique, Knowl.-Based Syst., 246 (2022), 108675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108675 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108675
    [29] Z. K. Huang, S. Mohamad, F. Gao, Multi-almost periodicity in semi-discretizations of a general class of neural networks, Math. Comput. Simulat., 101 (2014), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2013.05.017 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2013.05.017
    [30] T. W. Zhang, S. F. Han, J. W. Zhou, Dynamic behaviours for semi-discrete stochastic Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with time delays, J. Franklin I., 357 (2020), 13006–13040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.09.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.09.006
    [31] T. W. Zhang, Z. H. Li, J. W. Zhou, 2p-th mean dynamic behaviors for semi-discrete stochastic competitive neural networks with time delays, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 6419–6435. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020413 doi: 10.3934/math.2020413
    [32] P. Hu, C. M. Huang, Delay dependent asymptotic mean square stability analysis of the stochastic exponential Euler method, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 382 (2021), 113068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.113068 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113068
    [33] T. W. Zhang, Y. K. Li, Exponential Euler scheme of multi-delay Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order differential equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 124 (2022), 107709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107709 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107709
    [34] H. Bessaih, M. J. Garrido-Atienza, V. Köpp, B. Schmalfuß, M. Yang, Synchronization of stochastic lattice equations, Nonlinear Differ. Equations Appl., 27 (2020), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-020-00640-0 doi: 10.1007/s00030-020-00640-0
    [35] X. Y. Han, P. E. Kloeden, Sigmoidal approximations of Heaviside functions in neural lattice models, J. Differ. Equations, 268 (2020), 5283–5300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.010
    [36] X. Y. Han, P. E. Kloden, B. Usman, Upper semi-continuous convergence of attractors for a Hopfield-type lattice model, Nonlinearity, 33 (2020), 1881–1906. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/ab6813 doi: 10.1088/1361-6544/ab6813
    [37] J. C. Kuang, Applied Inequalities, Shandong Science and Technology Press, Shandong, 2012.
    [38] L. Arnold, Random Dynamical Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
    [39] T. W. Zhang, J. W. Zhou, Y. Z. Liao, Exponentially stable periodic oscillation and Mittag-Leffler stabilization for fractional-order impulsive control neural networks with piecewise Caputo derivatives, IEEE T. Cybern., 52 (2022), 9670–9683. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3054946 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3054946
    [40] T. W. Zhang, L. L. Xiong, Periodic motion for impulsive fractional functional differential equations with piecewise Caputo derivative, Appl. Math. Lett., 101 (2020), 106072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2019.106072 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.106072
    [41] C. Aouiti, H. Jallouli, State feedback controllers based finite-time and fixed-time stabilisation of high order BAM with reaction-diffusion term, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 52 (2021), 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2020.1849861 doi: 10.1080/00207721.2020.1849861
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1697) PDF downloads(86) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog