The development of reliable control systems for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) requires accurate modeling of dynamics and a control architecture capable of handling nonlinearity, external disturbances, and parameter uncertainty. This study addressed that challenge through a comprehensive survey of UAV control strategies, including classical linear controllers (such as PID, LQR, and MPC), advanced nonlinear methods [such as backstepping, sliding mode control (SMC), H-infinity, and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC)], and intelligent control algorithms like fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks (ANN). Based on this, the paper proposed a hybrid ANN-PID controller, where the neural network dynamically adjusts the PID coefficients to enhance adaptability and robustness. The method was evaluated through simulations on the UAV model using Euler–Lagrange dynamics. The quantitative results showed that ANN-PID achieves the lowest steady-state error (0.0229 m), nearly equivalent to PID (0.0230 m) but significantly superior to LQR (0.0807 m, an improvement of about 72%). Regarding rise time, ANN-PID responds quickly (~2.01 s), similar to PID and much faster than LQR (~7.4 s). Although the overshoot of all controllers is high, ANN-PID still achieves a lower value than PID and significantly reduces it compared to LQR under noisy conditions. These results affirm the superiority of the ANN-PID hybrid structure in UAV control, especially in nonlinear and complex dynamic environments.
Citation: Vo Van An, Trinh Luong Mien, Nguyen Van Binh. A comprehensive survey of UAV control algorithms: Integrating classical methods with artificial intelligence for enhanced trajectory tracking[J]. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2026, 10(1): 26-53. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2026002
The development of reliable control systems for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) requires accurate modeling of dynamics and a control architecture capable of handling nonlinearity, external disturbances, and parameter uncertainty. This study addressed that challenge through a comprehensive survey of UAV control strategies, including classical linear controllers (such as PID, LQR, and MPC), advanced nonlinear methods [such as backstepping, sliding mode control (SMC), H-infinity, and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC)], and intelligent control algorithms like fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks (ANN). Based on this, the paper proposed a hybrid ANN-PID controller, where the neural network dynamically adjusts the PID coefficients to enhance adaptability and robustness. The method was evaluated through simulations on the UAV model using Euler–Lagrange dynamics. The quantitative results showed that ANN-PID achieves the lowest steady-state error (0.0229 m), nearly equivalent to PID (0.0230 m) but significantly superior to LQR (0.0807 m, an improvement of about 72%). Regarding rise time, ANN-PID responds quickly (~2.01 s), similar to PID and much faster than LQR (~7.4 s). Although the overshoot of all controllers is high, ANN-PID still achieves a lower value than PID and significantly reduces it compared to LQR under noisy conditions. These results affirm the superiority of the ANN-PID hybrid structure in UAV control, especially in nonlinear and complex dynamic environments.
| [1] |
Kim JH, Sukkarieh S, Wishart S (2006) Real-Time Navigation, Guidance, and Control of a UAV Using Low-Cost Sensors. Field and Service Robotics: Recent Advances in Reserch and Applications 24: 299‒309. https://doi.org/10.1007/10991459_29 doi: 10.1007/10991459_29
|
| [2] |
Kwak J, Sung Y (2018) Autonomous UAV Flight Control for GPS-Based Navigation. IEEE Access 6: 37947‒37955. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2854712 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2854712
|
| [3] |
Xu Y, Chen Z, Deng C, Wang S, Wang J (2024) LCDL: Toward Dynamic Localization for Autonomous Landing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on LiDAR–Camera Fusion. IEEE Sens J 24: 26407‒26415. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3424218 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3424218
|
| [4] |
Deng C, Wang S, Wang J, Xu Y, Chen Z (2025) LiDAR Depth Cluster Active Detection and Localization for a UAV with Partial Information Loss in GNSS. Unmanned Syst 13: 491‒503. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2301385025500293 doi: 10.1142/S2301385025500293
|
| [5] |
Maaruf M, Mahmoud M, Ma'arif A (2022) A Survey of Control Methods for Quadrotor UAV. International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems 2: 652‒665. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v2i4.743 doi: 10.31763/ijrcs.v2i4.743
|
| [6] |
MA A, Saleem A (2024) Quadrotor Modeling Approaches and Trajectory Tracking Control Algorithms: A Review. International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems 4: 401‒426. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v4i1.1324 doi: 10.31763/ijrcs.v4i1.1324
|
| [7] |
Khuat TH, Bui DN, Nguyen HT, Trinh ML, Nguyen MT, Phung MD (2025) Multi-goal Rapidly Exploring Random Tree with Safety and Dynamic Constraints for UAV Cooperative Path Planning. IEEE T Veh Technol 74: 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2025.3560658 doi: 10.1109/TVT.2025.3560658
|
| [8] |
Nguyen MT, Nguyen CV, Do HT, Hua HT, Tran TA, Nguyen AD, et al. (2021) Guido Ala and Fabio Viola UAV-Assisted Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. Electronics 10: 11‒24. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10212603 doi: 10.3390/electronics10212603
|
| [9] |
Hung N, Rego F, Quintas J, Cruz J, Jacinto M, Souto D, Potes A, et al. (2022) A review of path following control strategies for autonomous robotic vehicles: theory, simulations, and experiments. J Field Robot 40: 747‒779. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.22142 doi: 10.1002/rob.22142
|
| [10] | Niu H, Lu Y, Savvaris A, Tsourdos A (2016) Efficient Path Following Algorithm for Unmanned Surface Vehicle. OCEANS 2016 – Shanghai, 1‒7. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSAP.2016.7485430 |
| [11] |
Do HT, Hua HT, Nguyen MT, Nguyen CV, Nguyen HT, Nguyen HT, el al. (2021) Formation Control Algorithms for Multiple-UAVs: A Comprehensive Survey. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems 8: 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.10-6-2021.170230 doi: 10.4108/eai.10-6-2021.170230
|
| [12] |
Le A, Truong L, Quyen T, Nguyen C, Nguyen M (2020) Wireless Power Transfer Near-field Technologies for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Review. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems 7: 1‒18. http://dx. doi.org/10.4108/eai.31-1-2020.162831 doi: 10.4108/eai.31-1-2020.162831
|
| [13] |
Nguyen MT, Nguyen CV, Truong LH, Le AM, Quyen TV, Masaracchia A, et al. (2020) Electromagnetic Field Based WPT Technologies for UAVs: A Comprehensive Survey. Electronics 9: 1‒31. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9030461 doi: 10.3390/electronics9030461
|
| [14] |
Van Nguyen C, Van Quyen T, Le AM, Truong LH, Nguyen MT (2020) Advanced Hybrid Energy Harvesting Systems for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst J 5: 33‒49. https://doi.org/ 10.25046/aj050105 doi: 10.25046/aj050105
|
| [15] | Luukkonen T (2011) Modelling and control of quadcopter. School of Science. |
| [16] |
Mien TL, Van An V (2024) Modeling and control of 6-DOF UAV quadcopter using PID controllers arcording to Ziegler-Nichols. III International Scientific and Practical Conference Intelligent Transport Systems, Moscow, 438‒492. https://doi.org/10.30932/9785002446094-2024-483-492 doi: 10.30932/9785002446094-2024-483-492
|
| [17] |
Mien TL, Tu TN, Van An V (2024) Cascade PID Control for Altitude and Angular Position Stabilization of 6-DOF UAV Quadcopter. International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems 4: 814‒831. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v4i2.1410 doi: 10.31763/ijrcs.v4i2.1410
|
| [18] |
Zouaoui S, Mohamed E, Kouider B (2019) Easy Tracking of UAV Using PID Controller. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering 47: 171‒177. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.10838 doi: 10.3311/PPtr.10838
|
| [19] |
Mien T, Tu T (2024) Design and Quality Evaluation of the Position and Attitude Control System for 6-DOF UAV Quadcopter Using Heuristic PID Tuning Methods. International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems 4: 1712‒1730. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v4i4.1594 doi: 10.31763/ijrcs.v4i4.1594
|
| [20] | Salih A, Moghavvemi M, Mohamed HA (2020) Flight PID controller design for a UAV quadrotor. Sci Res Essays 5: 3660‒3667. |
| [21] |
Trinh ML, Nguyen DT, Dinh LQ, Nguyen MD, Setiadi DRIM, Nguyen MT (2025). Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Networking Algorithms: Communication, Control, and AI-Based Approaches. Algorithms 18: 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18050244 doi: 10.3390/a18050244
|
| [22] |
Saibi A, Boushaki R, Belaidi H (2022) Backstepping Control of Drone. Engineering Proceedings 14: 1‒9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022014004 doi: 10.3390/engproc2022014004
|
| [23] |
Anh LH, Toan LH, Thuan TD (2024) Quadrotor control applying backstepping algorithm. JMST 99: 99–108. https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.99.2024.99-108 doi: 10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.99.2024.99-108
|
| [24] | Huang T, Huang D (2020) Backstepping control for a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle. 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), 2475‒2480. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC51589.2020.9326765 |
| [25] |
Ha C, Zuo Z, Choi FB, Lee D (2014) Passivity-based adaptive backstepping control of quadrotor-type UAVs. Robot Auton Syst 62: 1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.03.019 doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2014.03.019
|
| [26] | Hamza A, Mohamed AH, El-Badawy A (2022) Robust H-infinity Control for a Quadrotor UAV. AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-2033 |
| [27] | Maha Rashad, Ayman El-Badawy and Abdelaziz Hamza (2025) Robust H-infinity Control for the Longitudinal Dynamics of a Fixed Wing Aircraft. AIAA SCITECH 2025 Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2025-2080 |
| [28] |
Lyu X, Zhou J, Gu H, Li Z, Shen S, Zhang F (2018) Disturbance observer based hovering control of quadrotor tail-sitter vtol uavs using h∞ synthesis. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3: 2910–2917. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2847405 doi: 10.1109/LRA.2018.2847405
|
| [29] |
Rekabi F, Shirazi FA, Sadigh MJ, Saadat M (2020) Nonlinear h∞ measurement feedback control algorithm for quadrotor position tracking. Journal of the Franklin Institute 357: 6777–6804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.04.056 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.04.056
|
| [30] |
Rodríguez-Abreoa O, Rodríguez-Reséndizb J, García-Cerezoa A, García-Martínezc JR (2024) Fuzzy logic controller for UAV with gains optimized via genetic algorithm. Heliyon 10: e26363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26363 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26363
|
| [31] |
Nekoukar V, Dehkordi NM (2021) Robust path tracking of a quadrotor using adaptive fuzzy terminal sliding mode control. Control Eng Pract 110: 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104763 doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104763
|
| [32] | Housny H, Chater EA, El Fadil H (2019) New deterministic optimization algorithm for fuzzy control tuning design of a quadrotor. 5th International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOA.2019.8727622 |
| [33] | Jiao Q, Liu J, Zhang Y, Lian W (2018) Analysis and design the controller for quadrotors based on PID control method. 33rd Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC) IEEE, 88‒92. https://doi.org/10.1109/YAC.2018.8406352 |
| [34] |
Alagoz BB, Ates A, Yeroglu C (2013) Auto-tuning of pid controller according to fractional-order reference model approximation for dc rotor control. Mechatronics 23: 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.05.001
|
| [35] | Yang J, Cai Z, Lin Q, Wang Y (2013) Self-tuning pid control design for quadrotor uav based on adaptive pole placement control. 2013 Chinese Automation Congress, 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2013.6775734 |
| [36] | Do HT, Nguyen CV, Tran HT, Nguyen VQ, Nguyen HT, Nguyen NH, et al. (2024) AR Marker Detection Based Autonomous Attitude Control for an Indoor Non-GPS Aided Quadcopter. Advances in Engineering Research and Application, ICERA 2023, Spinger, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62238-0_26 |
| [37] |
Okyere E, Bousbaine A, Poyi GT, Joseph AK, Andrade JM (2019) Lqr controller design for quadrotor helicopters. The Journal of Engineering 2019: 4003–4007. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.8126 doi: 10.1049/joe.2018.8126
|
| [38] |
Elkhatem AS, Engin SN (2022) Robust lqr and lqr-pi control strategies based on adaptive weighting matrix selection for a uav position and attitude tracking control. Alex Eng J 61: 6275–6292. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aej.2021.11.057 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.11.057
|
| [39] |
Cohen MR, Abdulrahim K, Forbes JR (2020) Finite-horizon lqr control of quadrotors on se2(3). IEEE Robot Autom Lett 5: 5748–5755. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.3010214 doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3010214
|
| [40] |
Abbasi SH, Mahmood A, Khaliq A, Imran M (2022) LQR Controller for Stabilization of Bio-Inspired Flapping Wing UAV in Gust Environments. J Intell Robot Syst 105: 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01699-w doi: 10.1007/s10846-022-01699-w
|
| [41] |
Islam M, Okasha M, Sulaeman E (2019) A model predictive control (mpc) approach on unit quaternion orientation based quadrotor for trajectory tracking. Int J Control Autom Syst 17: 2819–2832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-018-0860-9 doi: 10.1007/s12555-018-0860-9
|
| [42] |
Luis CE, Vukosavljev M, Schoellig AP (2020) Online trajectory generation with distributed model predictive control for multi-robot motion planning. IEEE Robotic Autom Lett 5: 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.2964159 doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.2964159
|
| [43] |
Schlagenhauf J, Hofmeier P, Bronnenmeyer T, Paelinck R, Diehl M (2020) Cascaded nonlinear mpc for realtime quadrotor position tracking. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53: 7026–7032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.444 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.444
|
| [44] |
Abdolhosseini M, Zhang YM, Rabbath CA (2013) An efficient model predictive control scheme for an unmanned quadrotor helicopter. J Intell Robotic Syst 70: 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-012-9724-3 doi: 10.1007/s10846-012-9724-3
|
| [45] |
Sadiq M, Hayat R, Zeb K, Al-Durra A, Ullah Z (2024) Robust Feedback Linearization Based Disturbance Observer Control of Quadrotor UAV. IEEE Access 12: 17966‒17981. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3360333 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3360333
|
| [46] |
Chen CC, Chen YT (2021) Feedback linearized optimal control design for quadrotor with multi-performances. IEEE Access 9: 26674–26695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057378 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057378
|
| [47] | Ye H (2018) Control of quadcopter uav by nonlinear feedback, Ph. D. dissertation, Case Western Reserve University. |
| [48] |
Mo H, Farid G (2019) Nonlinear and adaptive intelligent control techniques for quadrotor uav–a survey. Asian J Control 21: 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1758 doi: 10.1002/asjc.1758
|
| [49] |
Wang K, Hua C, Chen J, Cai M (2020) Dual-loop integral sliding mode control for robust trajectory tracking of a quadrotor. Int J Syst Sci 51: 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2019.1622815 doi: 10.1080/00207721.2019.1622815
|
| [50] |
Nguyen VC, Nguyen MT, Tran HT, Trinh ML, La HM, Nguyen HT (2024) Trajectory Tracking Control for a Quadcopter under External Disturbances. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 14: 17620‒17628, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8449 doi: 10.48084/etasr.8449
|
| [51] |
Labbadi M, Boukal Y, Cherkaoui M, Djemai M (2021) Fractional-order global sliding mode controller for an uncertain quadrotor uavs subjected to external disturbances. Journal of the Franklin Institute 358: 212–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.04.032 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.04.032
|
| [52] |
Wang Z, Zhao T (2022) Based on robust sliding mode and linear active disturbance rejection control for attitude of quadrotor load UAV. Nonlinear Dynam 108: 3485–3503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07349-y doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07349-y
|
| [53] |
Zhao L, Dai L, Xia Y, Li P (2019) Attitude control for quadrotors subjected to wind disturbances via active disturbance rejection control and integral sliding mode control. Mech Syst Signal Proc 129: 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.040 doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.040
|
| [54] |
Zhang Y, Chen Z, Zhang X, Sun Q, Sun M (2018) A novel control scheme for quadrotor uav based upon active disturbance rejection control. Aerosp Sci Technol 79: 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.06.017 doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.06.017
|
| [55] |
Jia Z, Wang L, Yu J, Ai X (2019) Distributed adaptive neural networks leader-following formation control for quadrotors with directed switching topologies. ISA T 93: 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2019.02.030 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.02.030
|
| [56] |
Boudjedir H, Yacef F, Bouhali O, Rizoug N (2012) Adaptive Neural Network for a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science and Technology 2: 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijfcst.2012.2401 doi: 10.5121/ijfcst.2012.2401
|
| [57] |
Dierks T, Jagannathan S (2010) Output Feedback Control of a Quadrotor UAV Using Neural Networks. IEEE T Neural Networks 21: 50‒66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2009.2034145 doi: 10.1109/TNN.2009.2034145
|
| [58] |
Godinez-Garrido G, Santos-Sánchez OJ, Romero-Trejo H, García-Pérez O (2023) Discrete Integral Optimal Controller for Quadrotor Attitude Stabilization: Experimental Results. Applied Sciences 13: 9293. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169293 doi: 10.3390/app13169293
|
| [59] |
Nguyen VC, La HM (2025) A Class of Hierarchical Sliding Mode Control based on Extended Kalman filter for Quadrotor UAVs. Systems and Control 1‒16. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.02851 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.02851
|
| [60] |
Trapiello C, Puig V, Morcego B (2019) Position-heading quadrotor control using lpv techniques. IET Control Theory Appl 13: 783–794. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6147. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6147
|
| [61] |
Labbadi M, Cherkaoui M (2019) Robust adaptive backstepping fast terminal sliding mode controller for uncertain quadrotor UAV. Aerosp Sci Technol 93: 105306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105306 doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105306
|
| [62] |
Eliker K, Zhang W (2020) Finite-time adaptive integral backstepping fast terminal sliding mode control application on quadrotor uav. Int J Control Autom Syst 18: 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0116-3 doi: 10.1007/s12555-019-0116-3
|
| [63] | Praveen V, Pillai S (2016) Modeling and Simulation of Quadcopter using PID Controller. International Journal of Control Theory and Applications 9: 7151‒7158. |
| [64] |
Choudhari RR, Sankeshwari SS (2016) Modeling And Pid Cascade Control For Uav Type Quadrotor. IOSR Journal Of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 15: 52‒58. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1508095258 doi: 10.9790/0853-1508095258
|
| [65] |
Najm AA, Ibraheem IK (2019) Nonlinear PID controller design for a 6-DOF UAV quadrotor system. Eng Sci Technol 22: 1087‒1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.02.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2019.02.005
|
| [66] |
Ashari A, Dharmawan A, Fadhli HA, Handayani AM (2019) Flight Trajectory Control System on Fixed Wing UAV using Linear Quadratic Regulator. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) 3: 345‒352. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV8IS080135 doi: 10.17577/IJERTV8IS080135
|
| [67] |
Acakpovi A, Fifatin FX, Aza-Gnandji M, Kpadevi F, Nyarko J (2020) Design and Implementation of a Quadcopter Based on a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). Journal of Digital Food, Energy & Water Systems 1: 1‒14. https://doi.org/10.36615/digitalfoodenergywatersystems.v1i1.409 doi: 10.36615/digitalfoodenergywatersystems.v1i1.409
|
| [68] | Priyambod TK, Dhewa OA, Susanto T (2020) Model of Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Control System in Waypoint Flight Mission of Flying Wing UAV. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC) 12: 43‒49. https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/5696 |
| [69] |
Chao Z, Zhou SL, Ming L, Zhang WG (2012) UAV Formation Flight Based on Nonlinear Model Predictive Control. Math Probl Eng 2012: 261367. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/261367 doi: 10.1155/2012/261367
|
| [70] |
Feng Y, Zhang C, Baek S, Rawashdeh S, Mohammadi A (2018) Autonomous Landing of a UAV on a Moving Platform Using Model Predictive Control. Drones 2: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones2040034 doi: 10.3390/drones2040034
|
| [71] |
Zheng R, Lyu Y (2023) Nonlinear tight formation control of multiple UAVs based on model predictive control. Defence Technology 25: 69‒75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2023.03.011 doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2023.03.011
|
| [72] |
López J, Dormido R, Dormido S, Gómez JP (2015) A Robust H∞ Controller for an UAV Flight Control System. The Scientific World Journal 2015: 403236. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/403236 doi: 10.1155/2015/403236
|
| [73] |
Rekabi F, Shirazi FA, Sadigh MJ (2020) Robust Performance Analysis for a Cascade Nonlinear H∞ Control Algorithm in Quadrotor Position Tracking. AUT Journal of Mechanical Engineering 4: 151‒168. https://doi.org/10.22060/AJME.2019.15561.5779 doi: 10.22060/AJME.2019.15561.5779
|
| [74] |
Lee D, Shim DH (2018) Development of Mini-Drones and Feedback Linearization Based Velocity Control for Outdoor Autonomous Swarming Flights. International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) 51: 178‒183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.538 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.538
|
| [75] |
Lotufo MA, Colangelo L, Perez-Montenegro C, Novara C, Canuto E (2016) Embedded Model Control for UAV Quadrotor via Feedback Linearization. International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) 49: 266‒271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.046 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.046
|
| [76] |
Eltayeb A, Rahmat MF, Basri MA (2020) Adaptive Feedback Linearization Controller for Stabilization of Quadrotor UAV. Int J Integr Eng 12: 1‒17. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2020.12.04.001 doi: 10.30880/ijie.2020.12.04.001
|
| [77] |
Eltayeb A, Rahmat MF, Basri MA (2020) Sliding mode control design for the attitude and altitude of the quadrotor UAV. Int J Smart Sens Intell Syst 13: 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2020-011 doi: 10.21307/ijssis-2020-011
|
| [78] |
Wang Q, Wang W, Suzuki S, Namiki A, Liu H, Li Z (2023) Design and Implementation of UAV Velocity Controller Based on Reference Model Sliding Mode Control. Drones 7: 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7020130 doi: 10.3390/drones7020130
|
| [79] |
Madani T, Benallegu A (2006) Backstepping Control for a Quadrotor Helicopter. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 3255‒3260. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2006.282433 doi: 10.1109/IROS.2006.282433
|
| [80] | Lecointe M, Defay F, Chanel CP (2015) Backstepping control law application to path tracking with an indoor quadrotor. Conference EUROGNC, 1‒19. |
| [81] |
Gavilan F, Vazquez R, Esteban S (2015) Trajectory tracking for fixed-wing UAV using model predictive control and adaptive backstepping. International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), 132‒137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.08.072 doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.08.072
|
| [82] |
Bie G, Chen X (2022) UAV trajectory tracking based on ADRC control algorithm, UAV trajectory tracking based on ADRC control algorithm. ITM Web of Conferences 47: 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20224702017 doi: 10.1051/itmconf/20224702017
|
| [83] |
Cai X, Zhu X, Yao W (2022) Design of the UAV Trajectory Tracking System Based on the Adaptive Neural Network - ADRC Method. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2022: 3262228. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3262228 doi: 10.1155/2022/3262228
|
| [84] | Xiyang W, Mingqiu L, Yang Y, Hongtao D (2021) Quadrotor Flight Control Based on Improved Active Disturbance Rejection Control Technology. International Conference on Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence and Mechanical Automation (IoTAIMA 2021) 1948: 012095. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1948/1/012095 |
| [85] |
Rao J, Li B, Zhang Z, Chen D, Giernacki W (2022) Position Control of Quadrotor UAV Based on Cascade Fuzzy Neural Network. Energies 15: 1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051763 doi: 10.3390/en15051763
|
| [86] |
Dong J, He B (2019) Novel Fuzzy PID-Type Iterative Learning Control for Quadrotor UAV. Sensors 19: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010024 doi: 10.3390/s19010024
|
| [87] |
Xu LX, Ma HJ, Guo D, Xie AH, Song DL (2020) Backstepping Sliding-Mode and Cascade Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Quadrotor UAV. IEEE/ASME T Mech 25: 2743–2753. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2020.2990582 doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2020.2990582
|
| [88] |
Almakhles DJ (2020) Robust Backstepping Sliding Mode Control for a Quadrotor Trajectory Tracking Application. IEEE Access 8: 5515‒5525. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962722 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962722
|
| [89] | Bari S, Hamdani SS, Khan HU, ur Rehman M, Khan H (2019) Artificial Neural Network Based Self-Tuned PID Controller for Flight Control of Quadcopter. 2019 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET), 1‒5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEET1.2019.8711864 |
| [90] |
Ben Jabeur C, Seddik H (2021) Neural networks on-line optimized PID controller with wind gust rejection for a quad-rotor. International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering, 1‒15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD52417.2021.9638741 doi: 10.1109/ICCAD52417.2021.9638741
|
| [91] |
Ben Jabeur C, Seddik H (2022) Optimized Neural Networks-PID Controller with Wind Rejection Strategy for a Quad-Rotor. Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC) 3: 62‒72. https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v3i1.11660 doi: 10.18196/jrc.v3i1.11660
|
| [92] |
Nguyen AT, Nguyen NH, Trinh ML (2025) Fuzzy PD control for a quadrotor with experimental results. Results in Control and Optimization 19: 100568, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2025.100568 doi: 10.1016/j.rico.2025.100568
|
| [93] |
Pham DA, Han SH (2022) Design of Combined Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic Controller for Marine Rescue Drone Trajectory-Tracking. J Mar Sci Eng 10: 1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111716 doi: 10.3390/jmse10111716
|
Figures(17) / Tables(5)
Vo Van An, Trinh Luong Mien, Nguyen Van Binh. A comprehensive survey of UAV control algorithms: Integrating classical methods with artificial intelligence for enhanced trajectory tracking[J]. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2026, 10(1): 26-53. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2026002
DownLoad: