Protocol Topical Sections

Protocol for a systematic review of the effects of gardening physical activity on neuroplasticity and cognitive function

  • Received: 30 January 2023 Revised: 05 May 2023 Accepted: 09 May 2023 Published: 18 May 2023
  • Background 

    The beneficial effects of gardening as a form of physical activity have garnered growing interest in recent years. Existing research suggests that physical activity enhances brain function through modifying synaptic plasticity, growth factor synthesis, and neurogenesis. Gardening physical activity is a promising, cost-effective, non-invasive intervention that can easily be augmented in the rehabilitation of neurodegenerative conditions. However, there is still insufficient literature. This protocol describes a systematic review to be conducted of scientific literature on the benefits of gardening as a physical activity that can promote neuroplasticity and improve cognitive function. This information can be useful as an intervention for persons who experience cognitive impairment brought on by cancer and chemotherapy in developing countries such as South Africa where there is real need to access cognitive rehabilitation.

    Methods and analysis 

    The systematic review strategy will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic literature database search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science will be carried out using medical search terms (MeSH), with English as the only permitted language, during the time period of January 2010 to December 2022. We will search for and review studies on how gardening as a physical activity impacts neuroplasticity and cognition. Two reviewers will read the titles, and abstracts and full text of the studies identified during the search to exclude records that do not meet the inclusion criteria. Data will then be extracted from the remaining studies. Any differences in opinion arising between the reviewers during the procedure will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool checklist will be utilized independently by two reviewers to evaluate the possibility of bias. The included articles will be subjected to narrative synthesis, with the results being presented in a thematic manner.

    Ethics and dissemination 

    There are no need for ethical approval because no patient data will be gathered. The results will be disseminated through an open-access peer-reviewed indexed journal, presented scientific meetings.

    PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023394493

    Citation: Antonio G. Lentoor, Tiro B. Motsamai, Thandokuhle Nxiweni, Bongumusa Mdletshe, Siyasanga Mdingi. Protocol for a systematic review of the effects of gardening physical activity on neuroplasticity and cognitive function[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(2): 118-129. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023009

    Related Papers:

  • Background

    The beneficial effects of gardening as a form of physical activity have garnered growing interest in recent years. Existing research suggests that physical activity enhances brain function through modifying synaptic plasticity, growth factor synthesis, and neurogenesis. Gardening physical activity is a promising, cost-effective, non-invasive intervention that can easily be augmented in the rehabilitation of neurodegenerative conditions. However, there is still insufficient literature. This protocol describes a systematic review to be conducted of scientific literature on the benefits of gardening as a physical activity that can promote neuroplasticity and improve cognitive function. This information can be useful as an intervention for persons who experience cognitive impairment brought on by cancer and chemotherapy in developing countries such as South Africa where there is real need to access cognitive rehabilitation.

    Methods and analysis

    The systematic review strategy will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic literature database search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science will be carried out using medical search terms (MeSH), with English as the only permitted language, during the time period of January 2010 to December 2022. We will search for and review studies on how gardening as a physical activity impacts neuroplasticity and cognition. Two reviewers will read the titles, and abstracts and full text of the studies identified during the search to exclude records that do not meet the inclusion criteria. Data will then be extracted from the remaining studies. Any differences in opinion arising between the reviewers during the procedure will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool checklist will be utilized independently by two reviewers to evaluate the possibility of bias. The included articles will be subjected to narrative synthesis, with the results being presented in a thematic manner.

    Ethics and dissemination

    There are no need for ethical approval because no patient data will be gathered. The results will be disseminated through an open-access peer-reviewed indexed journal, presented scientific meetings.

    PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023394493



    加载中


    Ethics and dissemination



    Ethics approval is not necessary because this study is a systematic review of previously published studies. Any modifications to the systematic review process will be evaluated and approved using the PROSPERO registry, and the specifics of those modifications will be included in the study's final report. Dissemination of the results of this study will be through peer-reviewed publications, a national and international conferences and interdepartmental webinars.

    Funding



    This research was supported by the National Research Foundation Thuthuka grant number [129528]; the Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Capacity Development Grant; and the Biological Psychiatry Early-Mid Career Development grant.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Disclaimer



    The funding agencies had no role in the study design; decision to publish the manuscript; or portion of the manuscript.

    [1] Selamat MH, Loh SY, Mackenzie L, et al. (2014) Chemobrain experienced by breast cancer survivors: a meta-ethnography study investigating research and care implications. PLOS ONE 9: e108002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108002
    [2] Das A, Ranadive N, Kinra M, et al. (2020) An overview on chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment and potential role of antidepressants. Curr Neuropharmacol 18: 838. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X18666200221113842
    [3] Mayo SJ, Rourke SB, Atenafu EG, et al. (2021) Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 7: 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00778-3
    [4] Henneghan AM, Van Dyk K, Kaufmann T, et al. (2021) Measuring self-reported cancer-related cognitive impairment: recommendations from the cancer neuroscience initiative working group. J Natl Cancer Inst 113: 1625-1633. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab027
    [5] Ren X, Boriero D, Chaiswing L, et al. (2019) Plausible biochemical mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (“chemobrain”), a condition that significantly impairs the quality of life of many cancer survivors. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1865: 1088-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.02.007
    [6] Du J, Zhang A, Li J, et al. (2021) Doxorubicin-induced cognitive impairment: the mechanistic insights. Front Oncol 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.673340
    [7] Chen Y-C, Sheen J-M, Wang S-C, et al. (2021) Methotrexate neurotoxicity is related to epigenetic modification of the myelination process. Int J Mol Sci 22: 6718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136718
    [8] Wardill HR, Mander KA, Van Sebille YZA, et al. (2016) Cytokine-mediated blood brain barrier disruption as a conduit for cancer/chemotherapy-associated neurotoxicity and cognitive dysfunction. Int J Cancer 139: 2635-2645. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30252
    [9] Geraghty AC, Gibson EM, Ghanem RA, et al. (2019) Loss of adaptive myelination contributes to methotrexate chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. Neuron 103: 250-265.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.032
    [10] Prowse N, Hayley S (2021) Microglia and BDNF at the crossroads of stressor related disorders: Towards a unique trophic phenotype. Neurosci Biobehav R 131: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.018
    [11] Pilakka-Kanthikeel S, Atluri VSR, Sagar V, et al. (2013) Targeted brain derived neurotropic factors (bdnf) delivery across the blood-brain barrier for neuro-protection using magnetic nano carriers: an in-vitro study. PLOS ONE 8: e62241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062241
    [12] Sekeres MJ, Bradley-Garcia M, Martinez-Canabal A, et al. (2021) Chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment and hippocampal neurogenesis: a review of physiological mechanisms and interventions. Int J Mol Sci 22: 12697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312697
    [13] Ferreira-Correia A, Barberis T, Msimanga L (2018) Barriers to the implementation of a computer-based rehabilitation programme in two public psychiatric settings. S Afr J Psychiatr 24: 1163. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v24i0.1163
    [14] Wilson A, Wills P, Pretorius C, et al. (2015) Cognitive rehabilitation groups: A thematic analysis of feasibility and perceived benefits for clients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury living in the Western Cape. Afr J Disabil 4: 7. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v4i1.175
    [15] Prvu Bettger J, Liu C, Gandhi DBC, et al. (2019) Emerging areas of stroke rehabilitation research in low- and middle-income countries. Stroke 50: 3307-3313. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.023565
    [16] De Sousa Fernandes MS, Ordônio TF, Santos GCJ, et al. (2020) Effects of physical exercise on neuroplasticity and brain function: a systematic review in human and animal studies. Neural Plast 2020: 8856621. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8856621
    [17] El-Sayes J, Harasym D, Turco CV, et al. (2019) Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: a mechanistic model and prospects for promoting plasticity. Neuroscientist 25: 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858418771538
    [18] Pedrinolla A, Tamburin S, Brasioli A, et al. (2019) An indoor therapeutic garden for behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Alzheimers Dis 71: 813-823. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190394
    [19] Park S-A, Lee A-Y, Park H-G, et al. (2019) Benefits of gardening activities for cognitive function according to measurement of brain nerve growth factor levels. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16: 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050760
    [20] Page MJ, mckenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 10: 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
    [21] Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, et al. (2014) PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 14: 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
    [22] Porritt K, Gomersall J, Lockwood C (2014) Systematic reviews, step by step. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 114. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000450430.97383.64
    [23] Lisy K, Porritt K (2016) Narrative synthesis: considerations and challenges. JBI Evid Implement 14: 201. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XEB.0000511348.97198.8c
    [24] Barnett-Page E, Thomas J (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 9: 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
    [25] Thomas J, Harden A (2008) Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 8: 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
    [26] Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews (2006) 92.
    [27] McGinnis GJ, Holden S, Yu B, et al. (2022) Association of fall rate and functional status by APOE genotype in cancer survivors after exercise intervention. Oncotarget 13: 1259-1270. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28310
    [28] Lepage C, Smith AM, Moreau J, et al. (2014) A prospective study of grey matter and cognitive function alterations in chemotherapy-treated breast cancer patients. Springerplus 3: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-444
    [29] Ge S, Zhu Z, Wu B, et al. (2018) Technology-based cognitive training and rehabilitation interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 18: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0893-1
    [30] Jia RX, Liang JH, Xu Y, et al. (2019) Effects of physical activity and exercise on the cognitive function of patients with Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 19: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1175-2
    [31] Bhalsing KS, Abbas MM, Tan LC (2018) Role of physical activity in Parkinson's disease. Ann Indian Acad Neur 21: 242.
    [32] Gallego Hernández A, González-Gálvez N (2021) Physical Exercise and Cognitive Function in Post-stroke Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Apunt Educ Fis Depor 146: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2021/4).146.01
    [33] Kumar M, Srivastava S, Muhammad T (2022) Relationship between physical activity and cognitive functioning among older Indian adults. Sci Rep 12: 2725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06725-3
    [34] Liu PZ, Nusslock R (2018) Exercise-mediated neurogenesis in the hippocampus via BDNF. Front Neurosci 52. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00052
    [35] Soga M, Gaston KJ, Yamaura Y (2017) Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis. Preventive Med Rep 5: 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.007
    [36] Gonzalez MT, Hartig T, Patil GG, et al. (2010) Therapeutic horticulture in clinical depression: A prospective study of active components. J Adv Nurs 66: 2002-2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05383.x
    [37] Dobielska M, Bartosik NK, Zyzik KA, et al. (2022) Mechanisms of Cognitive Impairment in Depression. May Probiotics Help?. Front Psychiatry 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.904426
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1276) PDF downloads(156) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog