
Citation: Dinesh Chouksey, Pankaj Rathi, Ajoy Sodani, Rahul Jain, Hashash Singh Ishar. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome in patients of orthostatic intolerance symptoms: an ambispective study[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2021, 8(1): 74-85. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2021004
[1] | Adeebah Alofee, Ahmed S. Almohaimeed, Osama Moaaz . New iterative criteria for testing the oscillation of solutions of differential equations with distributed deviating arguments. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(6): 3496-3516. doi: 10.3934/era.2025155 |
[2] | Taher S. Hassan, Amır AbdelMenaem, Mouataz Billah Mesmouli, Wael W. Mohammed, Ismoil Odinaev, Bassant M. El-Matary . Oscillation criterion for half-linear sublinear functional noncanonical dynamic equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1351-1366. doi: 10.3934/era.2025062 |
[3] | Osama Moaaz, Asma Al-Jaser, Amira Essam . New comparison theorems for testing the oscillation of solutions of fourth-order differential equations with a variable argument. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(7): 4075-4090. doi: 10.3934/era.2025182 |
[4] | Yumei Zou, Yujun Cui . Uniqueness criteria for initial value problem of conformable fractional differential equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 4077-4087. doi: 10.3934/era.2023207 |
[5] | Xiaojun Huang, Zigen Song, Jian Xu . Amplitude death, oscillation death, and stable coexistence in a pair of VDP oscillators with direct–indirect coupling. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6964-6981. doi: 10.3934/era.2023353 |
[6] | Anatoliy Martynyuk, Gani Stamov, Ivanka Stamova, Yulya Martynyuk–Chernienko . Regularization scheme for uncertain fuzzy differential equations: Analysis of solutions. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 3832-3847. doi: 10.3934/era.2023195 |
[7] | Weiwei Qi, Yongkun Li . Weyl almost anti-periodic solution to a neutral functional semilinear differential equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1662-1672. doi: 10.3934/era.2023086 |
[8] | Shufen Zhao . The S-asymptotically $ \omega $-periodic solutions for stochastic fractional differential equations with piecewise constant arguments. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(12): 7125-7141. doi: 10.3934/era.2023361 |
[9] | Huifu Xia, Yunfei Peng . Pointwise Jacobson type necessary conditions for optimal control problems governed by impulsive differential systems. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 2075-2098. doi: 10.3934/era.2024094 |
[10] | Yuhua Long, Dan Li . Multiple nontrivial periodic solutions to a second-order partial difference equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1596-1612. doi: 10.3934/era.2023082 |
Studying the properties of solutions to differential equations (DEs) is the main aim of qualitative theory. This theory is concerned with investigating features such as stability, periodicity, bifurcation, oscillation, synchronization, etc. This theory emerged from researchers' attempts to obtain sufficient information about the nonlinear models that appear when modeling biological, physical, and other phenomena; see [1,2,3,4]. The qualitative theory was also extended to include functional, fractional, and partial differential equations.
A functional differential equation (FDE) is a DE with a deviating argument. That is, the FDE contains a dependent variable and some of its derivatives for various argument values. These equations are distinguished by the fact that they take into account the previous and subsequent times when studying any phenomenon or system. In fact, the majority of studies on FDEs until the time of Volterra [5] focused only on some properties of some very special equations. A few books on FDEs were published. In the latter portion of the 1940s and the initial phase of the 1950s. Mishkis [6] laid the groundwork for a broad theory of linear systems in his book by introducing a general class of delayed-argument equations. In 1954, Bellman and Danskin [7] noted the many uses of equations containing past information in disciplines such as economics and biology. Bellman and Cook [8] provide a more comprehensive treatment of the theoretical framework concerning linear equations and the fundamentals of stability theory.
Oscillation theory, as part of qualitative theory, revolves around creating the criteria for the presence of oscillatory and non-oscillatory solutions to FDEs, investigating zero-order distribution laws, estimating the number of zeros in a certain period of time and the distance between neighboring zeros, and other basics. Oscillation theory has now become an important mathematical instrument for numerous advanced fields and technological applications. Obtaining oscillation conditions for specific FDEs has been a widely studied area in the last few decades; see [9,10,11,12,13].
Delay DEs that have the derivative of the solutions of the highest order with and without delay are known as neutral differential equations. These equations are apparent in the investigation of oscillatory masses and the modeling of electrical circuitry with ideal transmission lines (see [14]). Understanding the qualitative characteristics of delay differential equations is becoming more and more important as new models and developments in biology, economics, physics, and engineering keep appearing.
In the canonical scenario, we find new conditions to test the oscillation of nonlinear neutral FDEs of second order. Namely, we consider the FDE
ddt(aψ(x)[ddtz]α)(t)+q(t)F(x(g(t)))=0, | (1.1) |
where t∈I:=[t0,∞), α∈Q+ is a ratio of odd numbers, and
z:=x+px(h). |
In our study, we consider the following hypotheses:
A1: a∈C1(I,R+), q∈C(I,R+), and p∈C(I,[0,p0]), where p0<1.
A2: h, g∈C(I,R), h≤t, g≤t, g′≥0, limt→∞h(t)=∞, and limt→∞g(t)=∞.
A3: ψ∈C1(R,[m,M]), where 0<m≤M, and κ=m−1/αM1/α.
A4: F∈C1(R,R), ϰF(ϰ)>0 for ϰ≠0, F′(ϰ)≥0, and −F(−ϰw)≥F(ϰw)≥F(ϰ)F(w) for ϰw>0.
For a solution of Eq (1.1), we define a function x∈C1([tx,∞),R), tx∈I, which has the properties: a⋅ψ⋅(z′)α∈C1([tx,∞),R), sup{|x(t)|:t≥t∗}>0 for all t∗≥tx, and satisfies Eq (1.1) on [tx,∞). If a solution x of FDE (1.1) has arbitrarily large zeros, it is referred to as oscillatory; if not, it is referred to as non-oscillatory. The FDE (1.1) is said to be in the canonical case if
∫∞t0a−1/α(s)ds=∞. | (1.2) |
We can divide previous related works in the literature into two main parts. The first section consists of studies that are concerned with using different techniques to study oscillation, and the second section consists of studies that focus on improving the relationships and inequalities used in studying oscillation.
Oscillation criteria are often only sufficient conditions to test the oscillation and are not necessary. Therefore, finding different techniques and methods for studying oscillation is inevitable and necessary for the purpose of application to the largest area of special cases and also to get rid of some of the restrictions that may be imposed by some techniques.
In 2000, Džurina and Mihalíková [15] used Riccati substitution to provide some oscillatory conditions for the solutions of the equation
(az′)′(t)+q(t)(x∘h)(t)=0 | (1.3) |
with h(t)=t−k, k>0 and p(t)=−p0<1. Han et al. [16] acquired some Kamenev-type oscillation conditions for (1.3) when h′(t)=h0>0. By comparison method, Džurina [17] studied the oscillation of (1.3) with an advanced neutral term, i.e., when h(t)≥t.
Şahiner [18] presented Philos-type conditions for oscillation of (1.1) when α=1, F′(υ)≥K>0, and ±F(±υw)≥LF(υ)F(w), for all υw>0 and for some L>0.
Theorem 1. ([18], Theorem 2.1) Assume that
D0={(ϰ,ς):ϰ>ς>ϰ0} and D={(ϰ,ς):ϰ≥ς≥t0}. |
By P∈ℑ, we mean that the continuous real-valued function P with domain D belongs to class ℑ and satisfies
(i)P(ϰ,ς)=0forϰ≥t0;(ii)P(ϰ,ς)>0on the domainD0;(iii)P(ϰ,ς)possesses a continuous and non-positive partial derivative∂P/∂ς on the domainD0where ∂P(ϰ,ς)∂ς=−k(ϰ,ς)√P(ϰ,ς)for all(ϰ,ς)∈D0 holds fork∈C(D,R). |
If there is a function ρ∈C(I,R+) such that
limsupt→∞1P(t,t0)∫tt0(P(t,s)ρ(s)Q(s)−Mρ(s)a(g(s))4LKg′(s)G2(t,s))ds=∞, |
then all solutions of (1.1) are oscillatory, where Q:=q[1−p(g)], and
G(ϰ,ς)=k(ϰ,ς)−ρ′(ς)ρ(ς)√P(ϰ,ς). |
Putting P(ϰ,ς)=(ϰ−ς)n, n>1, in the results of Theorem 1.1, we obtain a Kamenev-type criterion of Eq (1.1).
On the other hand, in the most recent period, there was a significant surge in research activity concentrated on improving the inequalities that are used in the study of oscillation. One of the influential relationships in investigating the oscillation of neutral equations involves examining the interplay between x and its z, as well as the relationship between the corresponding function and its derivatives.
The classical substitution x>(1−p)z is often used in studying the oscillation of neutral equations. Moaaz et al. [19] devised improved conditions for the oscillation of
(a[z′]α)′(t)+L∑i=1qi(t)xγ(gi(t))=0, | (1.4) |
They provided the following relationship as an improvement on the classical relationship:
x>zν/2∑j=11p2j−10(1−1p0ηt1(h[−2j])ηt1(h[−(2j−1)])), |
for p0>1 and ν is an even natural number, and
x>z(1−p0)(ν−1)/2∑j=0p2j0ηt1(h[2j+1])ηt1, |
for p<1, and ν is an odd natural number, where h[±l]=h±1(h[±(l−1)]), for l=1,2,..., and
ηt1(t):=∫tt1a−1/α(s)ds. |
For the non-canonical situation, Hassan et al. [20] used the improved relationship
x>z(n−1)/2∑r=0p2r0(1−p0μ0(h[2r+1])μ0(h[2r](t))), |
when z′<0.
A research study for the fourth-order DE
(az′′′)′(t)+q(t)x(g(t))=0, |
Moaaz et al. [21] devised improved substitution for x by z in all cases of positive solutions.
Lemma 1. ([21], Lemma 1) Let x be a solution of (1.1) and x>0 eventually. Then,
x(t)>m∑r=0(2r∏l=0p(h[l](t)))[z(h[2r](t))p(h[2r](t))−z(h[2r+1](t))], |
for any integer m≥0, where
h[0](t):=t,h[l](t)=(h∘h[l−1])(t), forl=1,2,.... |
See [22,23,24] for other intriguing findings on the oscillatory nature of solutions to third- and fourth-order DEs that have been published more recently.
The oscillation criteria of neutral DEs depend on several factors:
– The substitution x by z;
– The monotonic and asymptotic features of non-oscillatory solutions;
– The technique used to obtain the oscillation criteria.
Improving any of these factors directly affects the oscillation criteria. In our paper, we test the extent to which the oscillation criteria are affected by improving the relationship between x and z. We used a well-known technique that produces criteria known as Kamenev criteria; but the improvement lies in the new relationships used in the study.
Here, we define a class of functions to obtain the oscillation condition of the Kamenev-type criteria. Suppose that
K:={(u,v,w)∈I3:w≤v≤u}. |
A φ∈C(K,R) belongs to the class Y (φ∈Y), if
(i) φ(u,u,w)=0, φ(u,w,w)=0, and φ(u,s,w)≠0 for w<s<u.
(ii) φ has the partial derivative ∂φ/∂v on K and ∂φ/∂v is locally integrable with respect to v in K.
For any function f∈C1(I,R), we define the following operator:
T[f;u,w]:=∫uwf(v)φ(u,v,w)dv, |
for w≤v≤u. Moreover, we define the function μ(u,v,w) by
μ(u,v,w):=1φ(u,v,w)∂φ(u,v,w)∂s, |
for all w<v<u. We notice that T[⋅;u,w] is linear. Using integration by parts, we find that
T[f′;u,w]=−T[(f⋅μ);u,w]. | (1.5) |
Here, we investigate the improved monotonic features of non-oscillatory solutions and then establish new oscillation conditions for (1.1). For simplicity, the class of all positive non-oscillatory solutions of (1.1) is denoted by the symbol S. Also, we assume that γ=1α(α/(α+1))α+1,
At∗(t):=∫tt∗1[a(s)]1/αds |
for t≥t∗, and
Gq(t;m):=q(t)F(m∑r=0(2r∏l=0p(h[l](g(t))))[1p(h[2r](g(t)))−1][At1(h[2r](g(t)))At1(g(t))]κ). |
First, we infer the monotonic behavior of positive solutions in the next lemma.
Lemma 2. If x∈S, then the corresponding function z of x conforms to z>0, z′>0, and (aψ(x)[z′]α)′<0, eventually.
Proof. Suppose that x∈S. From (A2), there exists a t1∈I whereby (x∘h)(t) and (x∘g)(t) are positive for t≥t1. Therefore, z(t)>0. Using (A4), we have that F(x(g(t)))>0. Hence, (1.1) becomes
(aψ(x)[z′]α)′(t)=−q(t)F(x(g(t)))<0. |
Thus, we find that aψ(x)[z′]α has a constant sign. This is the same as stating that z′>0 or z′<0 for t≥t2, where t2 is large enough. But, when z′(t)<0, this case contradicts (1.2), as displayed next:
Let z′(t)<0 for t≥t2. Then
(aψ(x)[z′]α)(t)≤(aψ(x)[z′]α)(t2):=−L<0. |
Hence,
z′≤−L1/αa1/α(t)[ψ(x)]1/α, |
which with (A3) gives
z′≤−L1/αM1/αa−1/α. |
Thus,
z(t)≤z(t2)−L1/αM1/α∫tt2a−1/α(s)ds. |
But condition (1.2) results in z(t)→−∞ as t→∞, a contradiction.
Consequently, the proof ends.
Lemma 3. Assume that x∈S. Then
z(t)≥M−1/α[a(t)ψ(x(t))]1/αz′(t)At1(t). |
Moreover,
z(t)[At1(t)]κ |
is nonincreasing, for t≥t1.
Proof. Let x∈S. From (A2), there is a t1∈I such that (x∘h)(t)>0 and (x∘g)(t)>0 for t≥t1. Using Lemma 2, we obtain
z(t)=z(t1)+∫tt11[a(ξ)ψ(x(ξ))]1/α[a(ξ)ψ(x(ξ))]1/αz′(ξ)dξ≥∫tt11[Ma(ξ)]1/α[a(ξ)ψ(x(ξ))]1/αz′(ξ)dξ≥1M1/α[a(t)ψ(x(t))]1/αz′(t)∫tt11[a(ξ)]1/αdξ=1M1/α[a(t)ψ(x(t))]1/αz′(t)At1(t). |
Hence, for any t≥t1,
0≥z′−M1/α[a(t)ψ(x)]1/αAt1z≥z′−M1/αm1/α[a]−1/αAt1z. | (2.1) |
Since A′t1(t)≥0, At1(t1)=0 and At1(∞)=∞, there is a t2≥t1 such that At1(t2)=1. Now, from (2.1), we obtain
0≥ddt(z(t)exp[−κ∫tt2[a(s)]−1/αAt1(s)ds])=ddt(z(t)exp[−κlnAt1(t)])=ddt(z(t)[At1(t)]κ). |
Consequently, this proof ends.
Next, we improve the oscillation results by deriving a new substitution for x by z.
Lemma 4. Assume that x∈S. Then (1.1) can be articulated as
(a(t)ψ(x(t))[z′(t)]α)′+Gq(t;m)F(z(g(t)))≤0, | (2.2) |
for t>t1 and any integer m≥0.
Proof. Let x∈S. From (A2), there is a t1∈I such that (x∘h)(t)>0 and (x∘g)(t)>0 for t≥t1. Using Lemma 1, we obtain
x>m∑r=0(2r∏l=0p(h[l]))[z(h[2r])p(h[2r])−z(h[2r+1])] | (2.3) |
From Lemmas 2–3, we find that
z′>0 and (z[At1]κ)′≤0. |
Then,
z(h[2r])≥z(h[2r+1]) |
and
z(h[2r])≥[At1(h[2r])At1]κz. |
Using previous relationships in (2.3), we arrive at
x>zm∑r=0(2r∏l=0p(h[l]))[1p(h[2r])−1][At1(h[2r])At1]κ, |
which with (1.1) gives
0=(aψ(x)[z′]α)′+qF(z(g)m∑r=0(2r∏l=0p(h[l](g)))[1p(h[2r](g))−1][At1(h[2r](g))At1(g)]κ)≥(aψ(x)[z′]α)′+qF(z(g))F(m∑r=0(2r∏l=0p(h[l](g)))[1p(h[2r](g))−1][At1(h[2r](g))At1(g)]κ)=(aψ(x)[z′]α)′+Gq(t;m)F(z(g)), |
where assumption (A4) was used.
Therefore, the proof ends.
The following theorem transforms the studied equation into the form of a Riccati inequality, or what is known as the Riccati technique.
Theorem 2.1. Assume that x∈S, and there is a constant L>0 such that
F′(υ)≥L[F(υ)]1−1/α, | (2.4) |
for u≠0. If we define the function ω as
ω:=υaψ(x)[z′]αF(z(g)), | (2.5) |
then ω satisfies
ω′(t)≤υ′(t)υ(t)ω(t)−υ(t)Gq(t;m)−Lg′(t)(Ma(g(t))υ(t))1/α[ω(t)]1+1/α, | (2.6) |
where υ∈C1(I,R+).
Proof. Assume that x∈S. By differentiating ω, we find
ω′=υ′υ⋅ω+υ⋅[(a⋅(ψ∘x)⋅[z′]α)′(F∘z∘g)−a⋅(ψ∘x)⋅[z′]α(F∘z∘g)2(F∘z∘g)′], |
which with (2.2) yields
ω′≤υ′υ⋅ω+υ⋅[−Gq−a⋅(ψ∘x)⋅[z′]α(F∘z∘g)2⋅(F′∘z∘g)⋅(z′∘g)⋅g′]. | (2.7) |
Since (a(t)ψ(x(t))[z′(t)]α)′<0 and g(t)≤t, we have
a(t)ψ(x(t))[z′(t)]α≤a(g(t))ψ(x(g(t)))[z′(g(t))]α≤Ma(g(t))[z′(g(t))]α, |
and then
z′(g(t))≥(a(t)ψ(x(t))[z′(t)]α)1/αM1/α[a(g(t))]1/α. | (2.8) |
Combining (2.7) and (2.8), we arrive at
ω′≤υ′υ⋅ω+υ⋅[−Gq−[a⋅(ψ∘x)⋅[z′]α]1+1/α(F∘z∘g)2⋅(F′∘z∘g)⋅g′M1/α(a∘g)1/α]=υ′υ⋅ω+υ⋅[−Gq−ω1+1/αυ1+1/α⋅(F′∘z∘g)(F∘z∘g)1−1/α⋅g′M1/α(a∘g)1/α]. | (2.9) |
Using (2.4), we find
ω′≤υ′υ⋅ω−υ⋅Gq−Lg′M1/α(a∘g)1/α⋅υ1/αω1+1/α. |
Therefore, the proof ends.
Here, we employ the previous results to derive a novel criterion that tests whether all solutions are oscillatory.
Theorem 3. Assume that φ∈Y, υ∈C1(I,R+), and there is a constant L>0 such that (2.4) holds. If
limsupt→∞T[υ⋅Gq−γMLα(υ′υ+μ)α+1(a∘g)⋅υ(g′)α;t,l]>0, | (2.10) |
then (1.1) oscillates.
Proof. Assuming the opposite of what is required means that there is a non-oscillatory solution to the studied equation, and this necessarily leads to guaranteeing the existence of a solution that eventually becomes positive for this equation. Let it be x. From Theorem 2.1, if we define the function ω as in (2.5), then ω satisfies (2.6).
Next, applying the operator T[⋅;t,l] to (2.6), we obtain
T[ω′;t,l]≤T[(υ′υ⋅ω−Lg′(M(a∘g)⋅υ)1/αω1+1/α);t,l]−T[υ⋅Gq;t,l]. |
Using the property (1.5), we obtain
T[υ⋅Gq;t,l]≤T[(υ′υ+μ)⋅ω−Lg′(M(a∘g)⋅υ)1/αω1+1/α;t,l]. | (2.11) |
By simple calculation, we find that the function H(ω)=c1ω−c2ω1+1/α, where c1, c2>0, has the maximum
H(ω)≤H(ωmax)=γcα+11c−α2, | (2.12) |
at ωmax=(αc1/((α+1)c2))α. Using (2.12), (2.11) becomes
T[υ⋅Gq;t,l]≤T[γMLα(υ′υ+μ)α+1(a∘g)⋅υ(g′)α;t,l]. | (2.13) |
Taking the super limit for (2.13), we have
limsupt→∞T[υ⋅Gq−γMLα(υ′υ+μ)α+1(a∘g)⋅υ(g′)α;t,l]≤0. |
This contradicts assumption (2.10).
Therefore, the proof ends.
Corollary 1. Assume that there is a constant L>0 such that (2.4) holds. If there are υ, η∈C1(I,R+) and ϱ, k>max{1/2,α} such that
limsupt→∞∫tlη(s)(t−s)ϱ(s−l)k[υ(s)Gq(s;m)−γMLαH(t,s,l)]ds>0, | (2.14) |
for l≥t0, then all solutions of (1.1) are oscillatory, where
H(t,s,l):=[υ′(s)υ(s)+η′(s)η(s)+kt−(ϱ+k)s+ϱl(t−s)(s−l)]α+1(a(g(s)))υ(s)(g′(s))α. | (2.15) |
Proof. By choosing
φ(u,v,w)=η(v)(u−v)ϱ(v−w)k, |
we find
μ(u,v,w)=η′(v)η(v)+ku−(ϱ+k)v+ϱw(u−v)(v−w). |
Using Theorem 3, condition (2.10) reduces to (2.14).
Therefore, the proof ends.
Corollary 2. Assume that there is a constant L>0 such that (2.4) holds. If g(t)=λt, λ∈(0,1], α∈Z+, a(t)≥1, and there is ϱ, k>α such that
limsupt→∞T[Gq;t,l][At1(t)−At1(l)]ϱ+k−α>1λαγMLαα+1∑i=0(α+1i)(−ϱ)ikα+1−iβ(k+i−α,ϱ−i+1), | (2.16) |
for l≥t0, then all solutions of (1.1) are oscillatory, where β(⋅,⋅) is the beta function.
Proof. Assume that
υ(t)≡1 and φ(u,v,w)=(At1(u)−At1(v))ϱ(At1(v)−At1(w))k. | (2.17) |
Then, we find that
T[(μ)α+1(a∘g)(g′)α;t,l]=1λα∫tl(At1(t)−At1(s))ϱ(At1(s)−At1(l))−k[ϱAt1(t)−(ϱ+k)At1(s)+kAt1(l)a(s)(At1(t)−At1(s))(At1(s)−At1(l))]α+1(a(λs))ds=1λα∫tl(At1(t)−At1(s))ϱ−α−1(At1(s)−At1(l))−k+α+1[ϱAt1(t)−(ϱ+k)At1(s)+kAt1(l)]α+1[a(s)]α+1(a(λs))ds. |
Since a′(t)≥0, we have that a(λs)/a(s)≤1. Hence,
T[(μ)α+1(a∘g)(g′)α;t,l]≤1λα∫tl(At1(t)−At1(s))ϱ−α−1(At1(s)−At1(l))−k+α+1[ϱAt1(t)−(ϱ+k)At1(s)+kAt1(l)]α+1[a(s)]αds≤1λα∫tl(At1(t)−At1(s))ϱ−α−1(At1(s)−At1(l))−k+α+1[ϱAt1(t)−(ϱ+k)At1(s)+kAt1(l)]α+1[a(s)]1/αds=1λα∫tl(At1(t)−At1(s))ϱ−α−1(At1(s)−At1(l))−k+α+1[ϱAt1(t)−(ϱ+k)At1(s)+kAt1(l)]α+1dAt1(s). |
Let w:=At1(s)−At1(l). Thus,
T[(μ)α+1(a∘g)(g′)α;t,l]≤1λα∫ϑ0(ϑ−w)ϱ−α−1wk−α−1[k(ϑ−w)−ϱw]α+1dw=1λα∫ϑ0[(ϑ−w)ϱ−α−1wk−α−1α+1∑i=0(α+1i)(−ϱ)ikα+1−i(ϑ−w)α+1−iwi]dw=1λαα+1∑i=0(α+1i)(−ϱ)ikα+1−i∫ϑ0(ϑ−w)ϱ−iwk+i−α−1dw=1λαα+1∑i=0(α+1i)(−ϱ)ikα+1−iϑϱ+k−α∫ϑ0(1−wϑ)ϱ−i(wϑ)k+i−α−11ϑdw=1λαϑϱ+k−αα+1∑i=0(α+1i)(−ϱ)ikα+1−i∫10(1−y)ϱ−i(y)k+i−α−1dy=1λαϑϱ+k−αα+1∑i=0(α+1i)(−ϱ)ikα+1−iβ(k+i−α,ϱ−i+1). | (2.18) |
Now, as in the proof of Theorem 3, if we assume the contrary, then we arrive at (2.13). Under assumptions in (2.17), inequality (2.13) reduces to
T[Gq;t,l]≤γMLαT[(μ)α+1(a∘g)(g′)α;t,l], |
which with (2.18) gives
T[Gq;t,l]≤1λαγMLαϑϱ+k−αα+1∑i=0(α+1i)(−ϱ)ikα+1−iβ(k+i−α,ϱ−i+1). |
Thus, we obtain
limsupt→∞1ϑϱ+k−αT[Gq;t,l]≤1λαγMLαα+1∑i=0(α+1i)(−ϱ)ikα+1−iβ(k+i−α,ϱ−i+1). |
This contradicts assumption (2.16).
Therefore, the proof ends.
In the following corollaries, we present an oscillation criterion for a special case of the studied equation, which is
ddt(a(t)(ψ∘x)(t)[ddtz(t)]α)+q(t)(xα∘g)=0. |
It is easy to notice that the function F(u)=uα satisfies (A4) and (2.4) with L=α.
Corollary 3. If there are υ, η∈C1(I,R+) and ϱ, k>max{1/2,α} such that
limsupt→∞∫tlη(s)(t−s)ϱ(s−l)k[υ(s)Gq(s;m)−γMααH(t,s,l)]ds>0, | (2.19) |
for l≥t0, then all solutions of (1.1) are oscillatory, where H(t,s,l) is defined as in (2.15).
Corollary 4. If g(t)=λt, λ∈(0,1], α=1, a(t)≥1, and there is ϱ>1/2 such that
limsupt→∞1[At1(t)]2ϱ+1T[Gq;t,l]>Mλϱ4ϱ2−1, | (2.20) |
for l≥t0, then all solutions of (1.1) are oscillatory.
Example 1. Consider the delay equation
ddt(11+sin2(x(t))ddt[x(t)+12x(h0t)])+q0t2x(g0t)=0, | (2.21) |
where h0, g0∈(0,1], and q0>0. We note that α=1, a(t)=1, p(t)=1/2, h(t)=h0t, g(t)=g0t, q(t)=q0/t2, F(u)=u, and ψ(u)=1/(1+sin2u). It is easy to verify that
m=12≤ψ(t)≤1=M, |
κ=2, At0(∞)=∞, h[r](t)=hr0t for r=0,1,...,
Gq(t;m)=q0t2(m∑r=0h4r0(2r∏l=0(12)))=q02t2m∑r=0(h202)2r. |
Now, we have
1[At1(t)]2ϱ+1T[Gq;t,l]=1[t−t0]2ϱ+1∫tlGq(s;m)φ(t,s,l)ds=q02[t−t0]2ϱ+1m∑r=0(h202)2r∫tl1s2(t−s)2ϱ(s−l)2ds. |
Hence, condition (2.20) becomes
q02(1+2ϱ)m∑r=0(h202)2r>1g0ϱ4ϱ2−1. |
Then, by using Corollary 4, all solutions of (2.21) are oscillatory if
q0m∑r=0(h202)2r>1g0. | (2.22) |
Remark 1. Using Theorem 1.1 with H(t,s)=(t−s)2 and ρ(t)=t2, we obtain that all solutions of (2.21) are oscillatory if
q0>2g0. | (2.23) |
Applying to the special case when g0=0.5 and h0=0.9, we notice that criteria (2.22) and (2.23) lead to q0>1.672 and q0>4, respectively. Therefore, our results improve results in [18]. For example, we find that our results guarantee that all solutions of equation
ddt(11+sin2(x(t))ddt[x(t)+12x(t2)])+2t2x(t2)=0 |
oscillate while the criteria of [18] do not apply (2=q0≯2g0=4).
Figure 1 shows one of the numerical solutions to Eq (2.21).
Example 2. Consider the delay equation
ddt(1+e−x2(t)etddt[x(t)+p0x(t−h0)])+q0e−tx(t−g0)=0, | (2.24) |
where h0, g0, and q0 are positive. We note that α=1, a(t)=e−t, p(t)=p0, h(t)=t−h0, g(t)=t−g0, q(t)=q0e−t, F(u)=u, and ψ(u)=1+e−u2. It is easy to verify that m=1, M=2, κ=2,
Gq(t;m)=q0e−t[1−p0]m∑r=0p2r0e−4rh0. |
By choosing η(t)=υ(t)=et and ϱ=k=2, we obtain
H(t,s,l)=eg0[2+2t−4s+2l(t−s)(s−l)]2. |
Thus,
limsupt→∞∫tles(t−s)2(s−l)2×[q0[1−p0]m∑r=0p2r0e−4rh0−12eg0[2+2t−4s+2l(t−s)(s−l)]2]ds=(q0[1−p0]m∑r=0p2r0e−4rh0−eg0)(+∞), |
which is fulfilled if
q0[1−p0]m∑r=0p2r0e−4rh0>eg0. | (2.25) |
Then, by using Corollary 3, all solutions of (2.24) are oscillatory if (2.25) holds.
Remark 2. Recent results in papers [26,27,28,29,30] provided many improved criteria that test the oscillatory characteristics of second-order neutral DEs. However, these results fail to apply to Eqs (2.21) and (2.24), because these results only apply in the case of ψ(u)=u. Figure 2 shows one of the numerical solutions to Eq (2.24).
The investigation into the oscillatory behavior of FDEs is affected by the accuracy of the relationships and inequalities used. In this article, we studied the oscillations of solutions of the class of FDEs of the neutral type (1.1). As an extension of the results in [21], we have derived a novel relation between x and z. We used the Riccati approach to couple the studied equation with an inequality of the Riccati type. Then, we presented Kamenev-type criteria that ensure the oscillation of (1.1).
Our results—as shown in Remark 2—have the advantage of being applied to a more general class of second-order FDEs of the neutral type compared to the results in [26,27,28]. Our results also presented more sharp conditions in the oscillation test than the results that dealt with the same equation (see Remark 1).
It would be of interest to formally extend our findings to the noncanonical case (At∗(∞)<∞). Also, an interesting point, as a future work, is to obtain an improved relation between x and z without the need for the constraint ψ(u)≥m>0, which excludes a large class of bounded functions such as sin2u, e−u2 and 11+u2.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors would like to thank Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2024R406), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2024R406), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
Kanjwal Y, Kosinski D, Grubb BP (2003) The postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26: 1747-1757. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.t01-1-00262.x
![]() |
[2] |
Freeman R, Wieling W, Axelrod FB, et al. (2011) Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome. Clin Auton Res 21: 69-72. doi: 10.1007/s10286-011-0119-5
![]() |
[3] |
Stewart JM (2009) Postural tachycardia syndrome and reflex syncope: similarities and differences. J Pediatr 154: 481-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.004
![]() |
[4] |
Thieben MJ, Sandroni P, Sletten DM, et al. (2007) Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: the Mayo clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 82: 308-313. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)61027-6
![]() |
[5] |
Peltier AC, Garland E, Raj SR, et al. (2010) Distal sudomotor findings in postural tachycardia syndrome. Clin Auton Res 20: 93-99. doi: 10.1007/s10286-009-0045-y
![]() |
[6] |
Sandroni P, Opfer-Gehrking TL, McPhee BR, et al. (1999) Postural tachycardia syndrome: clinical features and follow-up study. Mayo Clin Proc 74: 1106-1110. doi: 10.4065/74.11.1106
![]() |
[7] |
Low PA, Sandroni P, Joyner M, et al. (2009) Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20: 352-358. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01407.x
![]() |
[8] |
Raj SR (2013) Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Circulation 127: 2336-2342. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.144501
![]() |
[9] |
Safavi-Naeini P, Razavi M (2020) Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome. Tex Heart Inst J 47: 57-59. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-19-7060
![]() |
[10] |
Bryarly M, Phillips LT, Fu Q, et al. (2019) Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: JACC Focus Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol 73: 1207-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.059
![]() |
[11] |
Chen-Scarabelli C, Scarabelli TM (2004) Neurocardiogenic syncope. BMJ 329: 336-341. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7461.336
![]() |
[12] | Raj SR (2006) The Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS): pathophysiology, diagnosis & management. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 6: 84-99. |
[13] | Chouksey D, Sodani A (2015) Extended head-up tilt table test (HUTT) in unexplained recurrent loss of consciousness;asingle-center prospective study. Int J Adv Res 3: 661-670. |
[14] | Zaqqa M, Massumi A (2000) Neurally mediated syncope. Tex Heart Inst J 27: 268-272. |
[15] |
Carew S, Connor MO, Cooke J, et al. (2009) A review of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Europace 11: 18-25. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun324
![]() |
[16] |
Wells R, Spurrier AJ, Linz D, et al. (2018) Postural tachycardia syndrome: current perspectives. Vasc Health Risk Manag 14: 1-11. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S127393
![]() |
[17] |
Grubb BP (2005) Neurocardiogenic syncope and related disorders of orthostatic intolerance. Circulation 111: 2997-3006. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.482018
![]() |
[18] |
Kanjwal K, Sheikh M, Karabin B, et al. (2011) Neurocardiogenic syncope coexisting with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome in patients suffering from orthostatic intolerance: a combined form of autonomic dysfunction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34: 549-554. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02994.x
![]() |
[19] |
Bartoletti A, Alboni P, Ammirati F, et al. (2000) ‘The Italian Protocol’: a simplified head-up tilt testing potentiated with oral nitroglycerin to assess patients with unexplained syncope. Europace 2: 339-342. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0125
![]() |
[20] |
Sheldon RS, Grubb BP, Olshansky B, et al. (2015) 2015 heart rhythm society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope. Heart Rhythm 12: e41-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.029
![]() |
[21] |
Jacob G, Costa F, Shannon JR, et al. (2000) The neuropathic postural tachycardia syndrome. N Engl J Med 343: 1008-1014. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200010053431404
![]() |
[22] |
Lee H, Low PA, Kim HA (2017) Patients with Orthostatic Intolerance: Relationship to Autonomic Function Tests results and Reproducibility of Symptoms on Tilt. Sci Rep 7: 5706. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05668-4
![]() |
[23] |
Thieben MJ, Sandroni P, Sletten DM, et al. (2007) Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: the Mayo clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 82: 308-313. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)61027-6
![]() |
[24] |
Pandian JD, Dalton K, Henderson RD, et al. (2007) Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: an underrecognized disorder. Intern Med J 37: 529-535. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01356.x
![]() |
[25] |
Neeraj, Deolalikar S, Pannu A, et al. (2019) Clinical profile and cardiovascular autonomic function tests in patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. CHRISMED J Health Res 6: 79-82. doi: 10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_81_18
![]() |
[26] |
Ives CT, Kimpinski K (2013) Higher postural heart rate increments on head-up tilt correlate with younger age but not orthostatic symptoms. J Appl Physiol (1985) 115: 525-528. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00292.2013
![]() |
[27] |
Huh TE, Yeom JS, Kim YS, et al. (2013) Orthostatic symptoms does not always manifest during tilt-table test in pediatric postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome patients. Korean J Pediatr 56: 32-36. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2013.56.1.32
![]() |
[28] | Wieling W (1988) Standing, orthostatic stress and autonomic function. A textbook of clinical disorders of the autonomic nervous system Oxford: Oxford University Press, 308-320. |
[29] |
Ojha A, McNeeley K, Heller E, et al. (2010) Orthostatic syndromes differ in syncope frequency. Am J Med 123: 245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.018
![]() |
[30] |
Krediet CT, van Dijk N, Linzer M, et al. (2002) Management of vasovagal syncope: controlling or aborting faints by leg crossing and muscle tensing. Circulation 106: 1684-1689. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000030939.12646.8F
![]() |
[31] |
Galbreath MM, Shibata S, VanGundy TB, et al. (2011) Effects of exercise training on arterial-cardiac baroreflex function in POTS. Clin Auton Res 21: 73-80. doi: 10.1007/s10286-010-0091-5
![]() |
[32] |
Alshekhlee A, Guerch M, Ridha F, et al. (2008) Postural tachycardia syndrome with asystole on head-up tilt. Clin Auton Res 18: 36-39. doi: 10.1007/s10286-007-0445-9
![]() |
[33] |
Kimpinski K, Figueroa JJ, Singer W, et al. (2012) A prospective, 1-yearfollow-up study of postural tachycardia syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 87: 746-752. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.020
![]() |
1. | Hail S. Alrashdi, Fahd Masood, Ahmad M. Alshamrani, Sameh S. Askar, Monica Botros, New oscillation results for noncanonical quasilinear differential equations of neutral type, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 14372, 10.3934/math.2025647 |