Review

Exploring the dynamic of NKG2D/NKG2DL axis: A central regulator of NK cell functions

  • Received: 03 March 2025 Revised: 30 April 2025 Accepted: 09 May 2025 Published: 13 May 2025
  • Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic innate lymphocytes that represent the first line of defense against pathogen infections and tumor growth thanks to their ability to kill cancerous or infected cells and release pro-inflammatory cytokines. NK cell activation is regulated by the expression of a wide array of inhibitory receptors for MHC-I molecules and activating receptors, including NKG2D, which recognize self-ligands upregulated on stressed and damaged cells. Even though the expression of NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL) flags the target cells for NK cell-mediated elimination, a persistent interaction of NKG2D with its ligands promotes receptor downregulation, mainly through the internalization and lysosomal degradation of NKG2D/NKG2DL complexes, thus leading to an exhausted phenotype. On both human and murine NK cells, this phenotype is characterized by the down-modulation of the cytolytic machinery and the upregulation of inhibitory receptors.

    In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on the contribution of the NKG2D/NKG2DL axis in both NK cell-mediated clearance of infected and transformed cells and in the dysregulation of NK cell activity due to chronic exposure to NKG2DLs during tumorigenesis.

    Citation: Caterina Marangio, Rosa Molfetta, Erisa Putro, Alessia Carnevale, Rossella Paolini. Exploring the dynamic of NKG2D/NKG2DL axis: A central regulator of NK cell functions[J]. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2025, 9(2): 70-88. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2025005

    Related Papers:

    [1] Rosa Molfetta, Beatrice Zitti, Angela Santoni, Rossella Paolini . Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers modulate NK cell-mediated recognition and killing of damaged cells. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(4): 164-180. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.4.164
    [2] Stefano Regis, Fabio Caliendo, Alessandra Dondero, Francesca Bellora, Beatrice Casu, Cristina Bottino, Roberta Castriconi . Main NK cell receptors and their ligands: regulation by microRNAs. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(2): 98-112. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.2.98
    [3] Mansur Aliyu, Fatema Zohora, Ali Akbar Saboor-Yaraghi . Spleen in innate and adaptive immunity regulation. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(1): 1-17. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021001
    [4] Michael D. Caponegro, Jeremy Tetsuo Miyauchi, Stella E. Tsirka . Contributions of immune cell populations in the maintenance, progression, and therapeutic modalities of glioma. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(1): 24-44. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.1.24
    [5] Ken S. Rosenthal, Jordan B. Baker . The immune system through the ages. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2022, 6(3): 170-187. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2022013
    [6] Katarzyna Nazimek . The complex functions of microRNA-150 in allergy, autoimmunity and immune tolerance. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(4): 195-221. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021016
    [7] Stephen C Allen . Cytokine signaling in the modulation of post-acute and chronic systemic inflammation: a review of the influence of exercise and certain drugs. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2020, 4(4): 100-116. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2020009
    [8] Arosh S. Perera Molligoda Arachchige . A universal CAR-NK cell approach for HIV eradication. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(3): 192-194. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021015
    [9] Ling Wang, Shunbin Ning . “Toll-free” pathways for production of type I interferons. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(3): 143-163. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.3.143
    [10] Declan P. McKernan . Toll-like receptors and immune cell crosstalk in the intestinal epithelium. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2019, 3(1): 13-31. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2019.1.13
  • Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic innate lymphocytes that represent the first line of defense against pathogen infections and tumor growth thanks to their ability to kill cancerous or infected cells and release pro-inflammatory cytokines. NK cell activation is regulated by the expression of a wide array of inhibitory receptors for MHC-I molecules and activating receptors, including NKG2D, which recognize self-ligands upregulated on stressed and damaged cells. Even though the expression of NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL) flags the target cells for NK cell-mediated elimination, a persistent interaction of NKG2D with its ligands promotes receptor downregulation, mainly through the internalization and lysosomal degradation of NKG2D/NKG2DL complexes, thus leading to an exhausted phenotype. On both human and murine NK cells, this phenotype is characterized by the down-modulation of the cytolytic machinery and the upregulation of inhibitory receptors.

    In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on the contribution of the NKG2D/NKG2DL axis in both NK cell-mediated clearance of infected and transformed cells and in the dysregulation of NK cell activity due to chronic exposure to NKG2DLs during tumorigenesis.



    Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic innate lymphocytes which share many functional features with CD8+ T cells. However, while T-cell recognition and activation primarily rely on antigen-specific T-cell receptors (TCRs), NK cells utilize a diverse set of germline-encoded receptors. Their activation is influenced by a balance between inhibitory and activating receptors [1][3].

    The crucial inhibitory signal for NK cells comes from MHC class I molecules. Receptors that interact with these molecules include Ly49 receptors in mice and Killer-cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptors (KIRs) in humans, which bind classical MHC-I molecules and CD94/NKG2A heterodimers and recognize HLA-E in human and Qa-1(b) in mouse. Ligand binding to these receptors initiates inhibitory signals that preserve healthy cells from lysis [4],[5].

    Among the activating receptors, NKG2D (Natural Killer receptor group 2, member D), Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors (NCRs), and DNAX-associated molecule-1 (DNAM-1 or CD226) are key molecules which recognize self-proteins that are either classically absent or expressed at low levels on healthy cells but are upregulated during stress conditions [6][12]. A notable feature of these receptors is their ability to bind multiple ligands. Specifically, human NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL) include MHC-I-related proteins such as MICA/B and ULBP1-6, while murine ligands include retinoic acid early inducible-1 (Rae-1), murine UL16-binding protein-like transcript 1 (MULT-1), and H60 [7],[9],[11].

    DNAM-1 interacts with members of the Nectin/Nectin like family of adhesion molecules, namely Nectin2/CD112 and PVR/CD155, while NCRs, that include NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30, have been shown to recognize a broad spectrum of ligands ranging from viral- and fungal-derived ligands to cellular ligands [10],[12],[13]. However, the full identification of such ligands remains incomplete.

    NKG2D is a C-type lectin receptor expressed not only by NK cells but also by CD8+ αβ T cells, invariant NKT cells (iNKT), and γδT cells [9],[11],[14][16]. The gene that encodes NKG2D, KLRK1, is on human chromosome 12p13.2 flanked by KLRD1 (CD94) on the centromeric side and by the cluster of KLRC4 (NKG2F), KLRC3 (NKG2E), KLRC2 (NKG2C), and KLRC1 (NKG2A) genes on the telomeric side. Orthologs of KLRK1 are present in the genome of all mammals, which indicates that the gene is highly conserved during evolution [17],[18].

    In early NK precursors, the NKG2D levels are relatively low, but its expression increases over time and is kept high in mature NK cells [19]. Experiments in NKG2D deficient mice revealed an unexpected role of NKG2D in NK cell development [20][22] and showed differences in receptor repertoire, with altered levels of c-kit (CD117), inhibitory Ly49 receptors, and the adhesion molecule DNAM-1 [20],[22]. In particular, Klrk1−/− mice were more susceptible to developing tumors that expressed NKG2DLs [23], thus demonstrating a pivotal role for the NKG2D receptor in NK cell-mediated anti-tumoral immune surveillance. Moreover, they showed an increased resistance to cytomegalovirus infections likely due to the hyperreactivity of NCR1 receptor [20],[21].

    Recently, a new role for this receptor in the recognition and killing of fungal pathogens has been envisaged [24], thus expanding NKG2D roles in immune surveillance.

    However, accumulating evidence has demonstrated that a persistent interaction of NKG2D with its ligands, both in the context of infections and tumor transformation, promotes receptor downregulation and contributes to the establishment of an exhausted phenotype in both human and murine NK cells [25],[26].

    This review recapitulates the contribution of NKG2D in the NK cell-mediated clearance of infected and transformed cells, as well as the functional consequences of chronic exposure to NKG2DLs during infections and tumorigenesis.

    NKG2D is a C-type lectin receptor composed of two disulfide-linked type II transmembrane glycoproteins, each possessing a short intracellular tail that cannot signal independently. Consequently, to initiate intracellular signaling, human NKG2D and a long splice-variant form of mouse NKG2D must associate with the transmembrane adaptor DNAX activating protein 10 (DAP10). Together, they form a hexameric complex composed of one NKG2D homodimer paired with two DAP10 homodimers [27].

    DAP10 displays a tyrosine-based motif (YINM) in its cytoplasmic domain, which is critical for recruiting phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) as well as the complex formed by the growth factor receptor–bound protein 2 (Grb2) and the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Vav1 [28][31]. Upon activation, PI3K initiates survival pathways by activating Akt, while the Grb2/Vav1 complex promotes the phosphorylation of Vav1, which, in turn, leads to the activation of Phospholipase C gamma (PLCγ2) and the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76 kD (SLP-76) [31]. Notably, DAP10 signaling is independent of Syk-family protein tyrosine kinases [30].

    Moreover, murine activated NK cells express an alternatively short-spliced isoform of NKG2D that can associate with either DAP10 or DAP12 [32],[33]. The latter adaptor contains an immune tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) in its cytoplasmic region, which recruits Syk and ZAP70 tyrosine kinases, thus leading to the phosphorylation of PLC and the activation of PI3K; additionally, similarly to DAP10, it is able to engage the Cdc42 family exchange factors, such as Vav2 and Vav3 [34].

    All these signals lead to the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and the reorientation of the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) to the immunological synapse [35]. This polarization is essential for the delivery toward the abnormal cell of lytic granules which contain perforin—responsible for forming pores in the target cell membrane—and granzymes, which enter the cell to activate apoptotic pathways, ultimately leading to cell destruction [31],[36].

    In addition to its role in triggering cytotoxicity, the activation of NKG2D on NK cells contributes to the innate immune response by inducing the production of various chemokines and cytokines [32],[36].

    In mice, DAP10-PI3K signaling is sufficient to trigger NK-cell cytotoxicity against certain tumor cell lines; however, it is not enough to induce cytokine secretion (e.g., interferon-γ) [32],[37]. On resting human NK cells, NKG2D often requires additional ITAM-mediated signals derived by other activating receptors, such as 2B4 or NKp46, to trigger degranulation and to initiate cytokine production [38][40].

    In parallel with the trigger of these intracellular signals, NKG2D engagement induces clathrin- and dynamin-dependent endocytosis in both murine and human NK cells [41],[42], leading to receptor down-regulation [42][44]. In particular, mouse membrane-bound NKG2DLs, including Rae-1 and HL-60, share the ability to induce NKG2D down-modulation with the human counterparts, which leads to the functional impairment of NK cells [45],[46].

    However, in humans, NKG2D internalization is differentially regulated depending on the ligands involved: engagement with MICA leads to an increased rapid internalization and lysosomal degradation compared to ULBP2 [44]. This difference likely arises because the ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl is required for MICA-induced, but not for ULBP2-induced, NKG2D endocytosis. Specifically, the ubiquitination of DAP10 at Lys84 drives the internalization and sorting of the NKG2D-DAP10 complex to lysosomes for degradation [42]. Interestingly, before being degraded, internalized NKG2D can trigger signals from the endosomal compartment, which is required for the full activation of NK cell effector functions [42].

    The ligands recognized by NKG2D are a diverse group of stress-induced molecules that play a pivotal role in immune surveillance. Under normal conditions, these ligands are expressed at low levels on healthy tissues; however, they are upregulated in response to stressors such as mitosis, viral infection, or transformation into cancerous cells [7][9],[11]. Structurally, NKG2DLs can be classified into three general categories. First, MICA and MICB are transmembrane proteins with three domains analogous to the α1–α3 domains of MHC I proteins. In contrast, the other ligands possess only two domains—analogous to the α1 and α2 domains of MHC I proteins—lacking an α3-like domain. Among these, ULBP1–3 and ULBP6 are glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked, while ULBP4–5 are transmembrane proteins. In mice, there are no orthologs of the MICA and MICB genes; instead, a family of genes homologous to the human ULBP/RAET1 family is located on chromosome 10. These murine genes encode proteins that fall into three subgroups of NKG2DLs: five isoforms of RAE-1 proteins, one isoform of MULT1, and three isoforms of H60 proteins (although not all mouse strains express every isoform). Specifically, mouse RAE1α–ϵ and H60c are GPI-linked, whereas mouse MULT1, H60a, and H60b are transmembrane proteins [7].

    NKG2DL expression is primarily regulated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels in response to different kinds of stressing signals [7][9],[11],[47]. Additionally, variations in the structural characteristics of NKG2DLs—such as whether they are GPI-linked or transmembrane—affect their membrane localization, binding affinity, and their release on soluble forms, thus influencing the overall immune response.

    One of the main pathways that leads to the upregulation of NKG2DL expression is the activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) and the first evidence that transformed cells can activate DDR was provided by Gasser and coworkers, who demonstrated that genotoxic stress conditions are responsible for persistent NKG2DL expression [48]. This mainly occurs through members of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-like serine/threonine protein family, ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR), and the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), which enhance the sensitivity of tumor cells to NK cell-mediated lysis [8],[48],[49]. Furthermore, MICA and MICB expression could be regulated in some conditions by the heat shock stress [50]; however, p53 could also amplify the transcription of certain human NKG2DLs, thus highlighting the regulatory effects of p53 [51],[52].

    Ligand recognition by NKG2D plays a pivotal role in combating viral infections. This activating receptor could bind to ligands expressed by the infected cells, thus triggering NK cell activation even in the absence of MHC class I molecule downregulation [1],[53]. During viral infections, DDR also serves as the primary signaling pathway that drives the transcriptional upregulation of NKG2DL expression [6],[8],[54],[55].

    It has been shown that when NK cells fight against HIV-1 infection, NKG2D engagement co-stimulates CD16 signaling, hence enhancing the ADCC-mediated killing of HIV-1-infected cells coated with the antibody recognizing the viral envelope [56]. Moreover, upon HIV-1 infection, the viral protein Vpr activates ATR kinase, which senses DNA damage and stress and causes a G2 cell-cycle arrest [57]. This state leads to the enhanced expression of specific ligands—particularly ULBP-1 and ULBP-2—on primary CD4⁺ T-cells, while sparing ULBP-3, MIC-A, and MIC-B. Accordingly, T-cell blasts infected with Vpr-deficient HIV-1 exhibit a reduced susceptibility to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity [58].

    Additionally, during the infection of the Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV), an endemic β-herpesvirus, the immediate early (IE) gene products play crucial roles in regulating viral gene expression activating cellular pathways such as DDR [59],[60]. In particular, IE2 directly binds to sequences within the MICA gene promoter, which activates its transcription, although this effect appears limited to specific cell types such as fibroblasts [61]. This may be crucial for the onset of an early host antiviral response.

    Additionally, NKG2D plays a pivotal role in tumor immune surveillance, as evidenced by mice deficient for this receptor that demonstrate a reduced ability to fight cancer [23]. Upon ligand engagement, NKG2D initiates intracellular signaling cascades that lead to the release of cytolytic granules containing perforin and granzymes, thus ultimately inducing apoptosis in the tumor cell [28],[29],[53]. Moreover, NKG2D activation enhances the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which further recruit and activate other immune cells within the tumor microenvironment [7],[9],[11].

    Despite these immune surveillance mechanisms, viruses and tumors have evolved strategies to evade NKG2D-mediated immunity.

    Several viral strategies can regulate NKG2DL expression, which dampens NK cell activation and thereby allows the virus to evade immune detection.

    Both murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) and HCMV are the viruses with the most powerful mechanisms to block the functions of NKG2D. Indeed, there is an array of viral molecules that target NKG2DL and impair the recognition and elimination of CMV-infected cells by NK cells [62][68]. In MCMV, different immunoevasins, such as m145, m152, and m155 gene products, specifically downregulate RAE-1 proteins, MULT1, or H-60, respectively [62][65], while HCMV expresses the viral protein UL16 that downmodulates the surface expression of ULBP1, ULBP2, ULBP6, and MICB without down-regulating the remaining NKG2DLs ULBP3, ULBP4, and MICA [69][71]. Instead, the viral protein UL142 downmodulates the expression of ULBP3 and MICA [72],[73].

    Other viruses may exploit similar or alternative strategies to evade NK cell immune surveillance.

    For instance, the HIV-1 Nef protein downmodulates the surface expression of MICA, ULBP1, and ULBP2 [74].

    During lytic infection, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) evades NK cell recognition by expressing the viral E3 ligase K5. Particularly, Thomas et al. showed that K5 modifies lysine residues within the cytoplasmic tails of both MICA and MICB with ubiquitin [75]. Consequently, these molecules are internalized from the cell membrane and intracellularly sequestered, affecting the capability of NK cells to recognize and kill infected cells.

    Some viruses are also able to alter the expression and/or functions of NKG2D. Among them, the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) induces the production of high levels of soluble MICA (sMICA). The presence of sMICA can act as a decoy molecule by binding to NKG2D without triggering activation, thus leading to a reduction in the NKG2D activity [76]. In severe pediatric RSV infection, NK cells exhibit diminished NKG2D expression and impaired cytotoxic function [76],[77]. Similarly, in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals with severe COVID-19 disease, a peripheral blood population of NK cells that show a low expression of NKG2D has been identified, and its presence correlates with a concomitant elevated level of soluble NKG2DLs, especially ULBP2 and ULBP3 [78].

    Contrasting results were provided concerning the Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) modulation of NKG2DLs. In some reports, their expression was described on latently EBV-infected cells; however, in other studies, an upregulation [79],[80], a de novo expression [81], or even a complete absence [82] in the late lytic cycle have been reported. Moreover, several studies reported the capability of individual EBV proteins or microRNAs to either repress or induce specific NKG2DL expression [83]. Thus, further investigations are needed to better understand whether EBV action on NKG2DLs could compromise the capability of NK cells to control viral infections.

    Regarding the regulation of receptor expression, a reduced expression of NK activating receptors, including NKG2D, has been shown by analyzing patients with severe and/or recurrent infection with the Herpes Simplex virus (HSV) [84].

    Moreover, during some viral infections, including SARS-Cov-2 infection, a cytokine-mediated downregulation of NKG2D can occur. Indeed, in severe COVID-19 patients, high levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the serum correlate with a reduced NKG2D expression on NK cells [85]. This downregulation contributes to a phenotype in which NK cells are hyperactivated yet functionally impaired. Additionally, a transcriptionally down-modulation of NKG2D expression can occur due to an EBV infection through the production of Kynurenine [86].

    The intricate interplay between viral strategies and the NKG2D receptor-ligand axis underscores its critical role in the immune system's ability to counter infections and prevent disease progression, which is summarized in Table 1. By manipulating NKG2DL expression and function, viruses can effectively evade immune surveillance, thus paving the way for persistent infections and associated complications. Targeted therapies designed to either restore the NKG2D activity or enhance the ligand recognition represent a promising avenue to restore immune function and mitigate the impact of on human health.

    Table 1.  Strategies used by viruses to affect NKG2D/NKG2DL axis on human NK cells.
    Virus Viral Factor Effects on NKG2D/NKG2DL axis Consequence on NK Cell Function References
    HIV-1 Vpr Upregulation of ULBP-1 and ULBP-2 on primary CD4⁺ T-cells Enhanced activation and cytotoxicity [57] Ward (2009); [58] Richard (2010)
    Nef Down-modulation of MICA, ULBP1 and ULBP2 surface expression Decreased susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis [74] Cerboni (2007)
    HCMV IE2 Binding to sequences within the MICA gene promoter Enhanced activation and cytotoxicity [59] Castillo (2005); [60] Xiaofei (2011); [61] Pignoloni (2016)
    UL16 Down-modulation of MICB expression Decreased susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis [69] Dunn (2003); [70] Welte (2003); [71] Müller (2010)
    U142 Down-modulation of ULBP3 and MICA expression Decreased susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis [72] Ashiru (2009); [73] Bennett (2010)
    EBV Kynurenine-mediated effect Down-modulation of NKG2D expression Decreased cytotoxicity [86] Song (2011)
    Lytic viral factors Upregulation or absence of NKG2DL expression Increased or decreased cytotoxicity [79] Azzi (2014); [80] Desimio (2024); [81] Pappworth (2007); [82] Williams (2015)
    RSV SARS-CoV-2 Production of sMICA Decreased susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis [76] Zdrenghea (2012)
    Production of sULBPs Decreased susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis [78] Fernàndez-Soto (2024)
    KSHV IL-6-mediated effect Down-modulation of NKG2D expression Hyperactivated yet functionally impaired [85] Osman (2020)
    HSV Reduction of NKG2D expression Disturbed development and functions [84] Lenart (2021)

    HIV-1: Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1; HCMV: Human CytoMegaloVirus; EBV: Epstein–Barr Virus; RSV: Respiratory Syncytial Virus; SARS-CoV-2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2; KSHV: Kaposi's sarcoma-associated HerpesVirus; HSV: Herpes Simplex Virus.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    During tumor progression, the chronic exposure of NK cells to NKG2DL-expressing cells induces receptor down-modulation with the consequent impairment of NKG2D-mediated cytotoxic cell functions both on human and murine NK cells [41],[44][46],[87][91].

    In humans, accumulating data have evidenced NKG2D reduced expression on circulating NK cells of patients affected by different kinds of solid cancers including colon adenocarcinomas, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and gastric cancer [87],[92][94]. In breast cancer patients, analyses of both peripheral blood and tumor-infiltrating NK cells revealed a strong down-modulation of NKG2D expression accompanied by a compromised cytotoxic activity, particularly evident on tumor-infiltrating NK cells, that correlates with an invasive phenotype and poorer prognoses [92]. Additionally, NKG2D down-modulation is evident in haematological malignancies, which also result in impaired NK cell cytotoxic functions [95][97]. This functional impairment is achieved by NKG2D internalization from the plasma membrane and sorting along the endocytic compartments until it reaches lysosomes, where internalized receptor complexes are degraded [42][44].

    NK cell activation can also be impaired by a strong reduction of NKG2DLs from the surface of tumor cells. Indeed, during tumor progression, the amount of a determined ligand can be controlled by various processes responsible for its release as a soluble form, including the protease-mediated cleavage and the exosome secretion [88],[90],[98][101].

    Interestingly, several lines of evidence have demonstrated that the presence of soluble ligands in the sera of patients with different epithelial cancers correlate with disease progression [102][104] and a reduced NKG2D surface expression [87],[89],[91],[95],[96], which suggests that soluble NKG2DLs share the ability to regulate receptor expression with their respective membrane-bound counterpart. To this regard, ligands on exosomal membranes show a great ability to induce receptor down-modulation [90],[91],[101], likely because they can multimerize and bind NKG2D with a high avidity. For instance, exosome-released ULBP3 molecules reduce NKG2D surface expression and compromise NKG2D-mediated NK cell cytotoxic function with a higher efficiency than the metalloproteinase-shed ULBP2 ligands [105]. The ability of exosomal multimeric NKG2DLs to efficiently down-modulate receptor expression can also reflect their ability to induce intracellular signals and elicit selective functional responses [91].

    All together, these data confirm the prominent role for NKG2D in cancer immune surveillance and demonstrate that tumors often exploit NKG2D down-modulation to evade NK cell surveillance.

    Of note, prolonged NKG2D stimulation and down-modulation can lead to a more general NK cell dysfunction, as depicted in Figure 1; this is characterized by the upregulation of inhibitory receptors and reduced levels of other unrelated activating receptors and effector functions collectively known as NK cell exhaustion (NCE) [106][110].

    In mice lacking NKG2D, NK cell prolonged stimulation results in minimal NCE compared with the control mice, thus identifying NKG2D as a crucial mediator of NCE [109]. Moreover, prolonged stimulation of murine NK cells with cells overexpressing the NKG2D ligand H60 impairs NKG2D-dependent cytotoxicity but also affects the functionality of CD3ζ chain-containing receptors CD16, NK1.1, and NKp46 [46]. Similarly, a downregulation of CD3ζ was observed when human NK cells were chronically exposed to MICA, thus rendering them hypo-responsive to CD16, NKp46, and NKp30, but not to 2B4 stimulation [111].

    Moreover, in vitro experiments showed that the sustained stimulation of NK cells to MICA leads to a defective activation of DNAM-1-triggered signaling and a concomitant increased expression of the inhibitory receptor TIGIT [110].

    Accordingly, NK cell exhaustion is evident in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), where a reduced expression of NKG2D and NKp46, coupled with elevated PD-1 levels, results in a decreased cytolytic activity and a diminished IFN-γ production [97]. These data suggest a pivotal role for NKG2D in promoting a dysfunctional phenotype that characterizes tumor-infiltrating NK cells (Figure 1).

    In conclusion, these studies collectively emphasize the critical role of NK cells in the immune response against cancer; however, their effectiveness can be compromised by various factors within the TME, where NKG2D appears to be particularly susceptible to this dysfunction. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial to develop novel therapeutic strategies to enhance NK cell function and improve cancer immunotherapy. By targeting the factors that contribute to NK cell exhaustion, such as NKG2D signaling and soluble factors in the TME, it may be possible to restore NK cell function and improve the patient outcomes.

    Figure 1.  The dual role of NKG2D/NKG2DL in NK cell tumor immunity. Expression of NKG2DLs on tumor cells induces immune surveillance via binding to NKG2D receptors on NK cells. During tumor progression, the chronic exposure to NKG2DLs on tumor cells and on exosomal membrane induces NKG2D down-modulation with a consequent acquisition of a dysfunctional NK cell phenotype. NKG2D, Natural killer group 2, member D; NKG2DLs, NKG2D ligands. This figure was created using https://BioRender.com.

    NKG2D's function is largely dictated by the nature of its ligands, yet its full repertoire remains incompletely understood. Although established ligands such as MICA, MICB, and ULBPs have been extensively studied in humans, emerging evidence suggests the existence of unidentified ligands that could broaden the scope of NKG2D-mediated immune responses.

    In certain noncanonical contexts, particularly in fungal infections, NKG2D has been proposed to act as a pattern recognition receptor (PRR) [24]. In this capacity, it directly recognizes fungal cells, most likely through conserved fungal carbohydrates, initiates immune activation, and facilitates fungal killing by both human and murine NK cells. Through this mechanism, NKG2D can target a broad range of fungal pathogens, including clinically significant species such as Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus.

    However, despite the receptor's activation during fungal infections, no specific fungal-derived ligands for NKG2D have been conclusively identified, thus leaving a critical gap in understanding how NKG2D recognizes and responds to fungal pathogens. This lack of knowledge highlights the possibility that unknown host-encoded ligands might be induced or modified in response to fungal infections. Alternatively, fungal pathogens might trigger atypical activation of NKG2D through indirect mechanisms, such as stress-related signals or the release of damage-associated molecular patterns from host cells.

    The interaction between NKG2D and fungal ligands can have different consequences on NK cells functions. Santiago et al. showed that NK cells form strong adhesions with Aspergillus fumigatus, which is accompanied by F-actin accumulation at the immune synapse and granule polarization [112]. Despite these signals leading to activation, the contact with Aspergillus fumigatus ultimately promotes an exhausted NK cell phenotype marked by the diminished expression of activating receptors including NKG2D [112]. Moreover, Aspergillus fumigatus compromises NK cell responses against leukemic cells, thus potentially exacerbating immune surveillance deficiencies in leukemia patients with pulmonary aspergillosis [112]. The induction of NKG2D dysfunction may vary depending on the specific pathogen. Indeed, a previous study has indicated that the expression of NKG2D remains unchanged during Candida albicans infections [113].

    The dual roles of NKG2D as a fungal PRR and an activator of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity against compromised cells highlight the critical function for NKG2D in innate immunity. However, NK cells dysfunction in consequence of persistent fungal infections, such as those caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, underscores the complexity of host-pathogen interactions. Utilizing these findings to create therapeutic approaches aimed at enhancing NKG2D activity could provide significant advancements in controlling fungal infections and related immune dysfunctions.

    The intricate regulation of NKG2D underscores its pivotal role in the immune system. NKG2D activation is indispensable for targeting infected or transformed cells; however, its chronic engagement could lead to NKG2D downregulation and dysfunction.

    In viral infections, pathogens could exploit the NKG2D axis to escape immune detection. On the other hand, in cancer, the TME profoundly affects NKG2D expression and NK cells, often inducing a dysfunctional phenotype which hampers the NK cell ability to effectively target the tumor cells.

    Moreover, emerging research revealed NKG2D's role as a fungal PRR, thus enabling NK cells to recognize and eliminate fungal pathogens. This function is vital for immunocompromised individuals susceptible to invasive fungal infections. However, a chronic exposure to fungal ligands can induce NK cell exhaustion, thus reducing antifungal efficacy.

    A deeper understanding of NKG2D biology could provide a foundation for innovative therapeutic strategies. These approaches might include fine-tuning the receptor signaling pathways, developing drugs to prevent exhaustion, or engineering ligands to enhance recognition and response. However, several critical questions remain: How can NKG2D signaling be modulated without disrupting its roles in immune responses? What are the precise mechanisms by which chronic stimulation leads to exhaustion, and can these be reversed or prevented? Additionally, could engineering NKG2D ligands improve specificity and minimize off-target effects? Transforming these insights into therapies could unlock the full potential of NKG2D, thus ensuring a robust NK cell functionality across diverse diseases. Such advancements hold promises for more effective treatments in cancer, infectious diseases, and immune disorders, thus positioning NKG2D as a pivotal target in the future of immunotherapies.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    All authors contributed to write the manuscript and prepared the figures.

    All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    Work in our laboratory is supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC IG-24955) and Istituto Pasteur Italia-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti (2020-366).


    Acknowledgments



    We apologize to all our colleagues whose important work could not be cited directly. Most of these references can be found in the review articles cited in the manuscript.

    Conflict of interest



    All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this paper.

    [1] Lanier LL (2008) Evolutionary struggles between NK cells and viruses. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2276
    [2] Long EO, Kim HS, Liu D, et al. (2013) Controlling natural killer cell responses: Integration of signals for activation and inhibition. Annu Rev Immunol 31: 227-258. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075005
    [3] Chiossone L, Dumas PY, Vienne M, et al. (2018) Natural killer cells and other innate lymphoid cells in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol 18: 671-688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-018-0061-z
    [4] Ljunggren HG, Kärre K (1990) In search of the ‘missing self’: MHC molecules and NK cell recognition. Immunol Today 11: 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5699(90)90097-s
    [5] Guia S, Fenis A, Vivier E, et al. (2018) Activating and inhibitory receptors expressed on innate lymphoid cells. Semin Immunopathol 40: 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-018-0685-x
    [6] Champsaur M, Lanier LL (2010) Effect of NKG2D ligand expression on host immune responses. Immunol Rev 235: 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2010.00893.x
    [7] Raulet DH, Gasser S, Gowen BG, et al. (2013) Regulation of ligands for the NKG2D activating receptor. Annu Rev Immunol 31: 413-441. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095951
    [8] Cerboni C, Fionda C, Soriani A, et al. (2014) The DNA Damage Response: A common pathway in the regulation of NKG2D and DNAM-1 ligand expression in normal, infected, and cancer cells. Front Immunol 4: 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00508
    [9] Lanier LL (2015) NKG2D receptor and its ligands in host defense. Cancer Immunol Res 3: 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0098
    [10] Martinet L, Smyth MJ (2015) Balancing natural killer cell activation through paired receptors. Nat Rev Immunol 15: 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3799
    [11] Zingoni A, Molfetta R, Fionda C, et al. (2018) NKG2D and its ligands: “One for All, All for One”. Front Immunol 9: 476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00476
    [12] Barrow AD, Martin CJ, Colonna M (2019) The natural cytotoxicity receptors in health and disease. Front Immunol 10: 909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00909
    [13] Fuchs A, Colonna M (2006) The role of NK cell recognition of nectin and nectin-like proteins in tumor immunosurveillance. Semin Cancer Biol 16: 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.07.002
    [14] González S, Groh V, Spies T (2006) Immunobiology of human NKG2D and its ligands. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol 298: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27743-9_6
    [15] Fernández-Messina L, Reyburn HT, Valés-Gómez M (2012) Human NKG2D-ligands: Cell biology strategies to ensure immune recognition. Front Immunol 3: 299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00299
    [16] Ullrich E, Koch J, Cerwenka A, et al. (2013) New prospects on the NKG2D/NKG2DL system for oncology. Oncoimmunology 2: e26097. https://doi.org/10.4161/onci.26097
    [17] Glienke J, Sobanov Y, Brostjan C, et al. (1998) The genomic organization of NKG2C, E, F, and D receptor genes in the human natural killer gene complex. Immunogenetics 48: 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002510050420
    [18] Basílio-Queirós D, Mischak-Weissinger E (2023) Natural killer cells- from innate cells to the discovery of adaptability. Front Immunol 14: 1172437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1172437
    [19] Huntington ND, Vosshenrich CA, Di Santo JP (2007) Developmental pathways that generate natural-killer-cell diversity in mice and humans. Nat Rev Immunol 7: 703-714. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2154
    [20] Zafirova B, Mandarić S, Antulov R, et al. (2009) Altered NK cell development and enhanced NK cell-mediated resistance to mouse cytomegalovirus in NKG2D-deficient mice. Immunity 31: 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.06.017
    [21] Zafirova B, Wensveen FM, Gulin M, et al. (2011) Regulation of immune cell function and differentiation by the NKG2D receptor. Cell Mol Life Sci 68: 3519-3529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0797-0
    [22] Sheppard S, Triulzi C, Ardolino M, et al. (2013) Characterization of a novel NKG2D and NKp46 double-mutant mouse reveals subtle variations in the NK cell repertoire. Blood 121: 5025-5033. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-12-471607
    [23] Guerra N, Tan YX, Joncker NT, et al. (2008) NKG2D-deficient mice are defective in tumor surveillance in models of spontaneous malignancy. Immunity 28: 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2008.02.016
    [24] Charpak-Amikam Y, Kournos M, Kotzur R, et al. (2024) The activating receptor NKG2D is an anti-fungal pattern recognition receptor. Nat Commun 15: 8664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52913-2
    [25] Molfetta R, Quatrini L, Zitti B, et al. (2016) Regulation of NKG2D expression and signaling by endocytosis. Trends Immunol 37: 790-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2016.08.015
    [26] Wensveen FM, Jelenčić V, Polić B (2018) NKG2D: A master regulator of immune cell responsiveness. Front Immunol 9: 441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00441
    [27] Garrity D, Call ME, Feng J, et al. (2005) The activating NKG2D receptor assembles in the membrane with two signaling dimers into a hexameric structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 7641-7646. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502439102
    [28] Bauer S, Groh V, Wu J, et al. (1999) Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress-inducible MICA. Science 285: 727-729. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5428.727
    [29] Wu J, Song Y, Bakker AB, et al. (1999) An activating immunoreceptor complex formed by NKG2D and DAP10. Science 285: 730-732. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5428.730
    [30] Billadeau DD, Upshaw JL, Schoon RA, et al. (2003) NKG2D-DAP10 triggers human NK cell-mediated killing via a Syk-independent regulatory pathway. Nat Immunol 4: 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni929
    [31] Upshaw JL, Arneson LN, Schoon RA, et al. (2006) NKG2D-mediated signaling requires a DAP10-bound Grb2-Vav1 intermediate and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase in human natural killer cells. Nat Immunol 7: 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1325
    [32] Diefenbach A, Tomasello E, Lucas M, et al. (2002) Selective associations with signaling proteins determine stimulatory versus costimulatory activity of NKG2D. Nat Immunol 3: 1142-1149. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni858
    [33] Gilfillan S, Ho EL, Cella M, et al. (2002) NKG2D recruits two distinct adapters to trigger NK cell activation and costimulation. Nature Immunol 3: 1150-1155. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni857
    [34] Cella M, Fujikawa K, Tassi I, et al. (2004) Differential requirements for Vav proteins in DAP10- and ITAM-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity. J Exp Med 200: 817-823. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20031847
    [35] Graham DB, Cella M, Giurisato E, et al. (2006) Vav1 controls DAP10-mediated natural cytotoxicity by regulating actin and microtubule dynamics. J Immunol 177: 2349-2355. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.4.2349
    [36] Vivier E, Tomasello E, Baratin M, et al. (2008) Functions of natural killer cells. Nat Immunol 9: 503-510. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1582
    [37] Zompi S, Hamerman JA, Ogasawara K, et al. (2003) NKG2D triggers cytotoxicity in mouse NK cells lacking DAP12 or Syk family kinases. Nat Immunol 4: 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni930
    [38] Bryceson YT, March ME, Ljunggren HG, et al. (2006) Synergy among receptors on resting NK cells for the activation of natural cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion. Blood 107: 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-04-1351
    [39] Bryceson YT, Ljunggren HG, Long EO (2009) Minimal requirement for induction of natural cytotoxicity and intersection of activation signals by inhibitory receptors. Blood 114: 2657-2666. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-01-201632
    [40] Kim HS, Das A, Gross CC, et al. (2010) Synergistic signals for natural cytotoxicity are required to overcome inhibition by c-Cbl ubiquitin ligase. Immunity 32: 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2010.02.004
    [41] Ogasawara K, Hamerman JA, Hsin H, et al. (2003) Impairment of NK cell function by NKG2D modulation in NOD mice. Immunity 18: 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00505-8
    [42] Quatrini L, Molfetta R, Zitti B, et al. (2015) Ubiquitin-dependent endocytosis of NKG2D-DAP10 receptor complexes activates signaling and functions in human NK cells. Sci Signaling 8: ra108. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aab2724
    [43] Roda-Navarro P, Reyburn HT (2009) The traffic of the NKG2D/Dap10 receptor complex during natural killer (NK) cell activation. Journal Biol Chem 284: 16463-16472. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M808561200
    [44] Molfetta R, Quatrini L, Capuano C, et al. (2014) c-Cbl regulates MICA- but not ULBP2-induced NKG2D down-modulation in human NK cells. Eur J Immunol 44: 2761-2770. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201444512
    [45] Oppenheim DE, Roberts SJ, Clarke SL, et al. (2005) Sustained localized expression of ligand for the activating NKG2D receptor impairs natural cytotoxicity in vivo and reduces tumor immunosurveillance. Nat Immunol 6: 928-937. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1239
    [46] Coudert JD, Scarpellino L, Gros F, et al. (2008) Sustained NKG2D engagement induces cross-tolerance of multiple distinct NK cell activation pathways. Blood 111: 3571-3578. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-07-100057
    [47] Molfetta R, Zingoni A, Santoni A, et al. (2019) Post-translational mechanisms regulating NK cell activating receptors and their ligands in cancer: Potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Front Immunol 10: 2557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02557
    [48] Gasser S, Orsulic S, Brown EJ, et al. (2005) The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor. Nature 436: 1186-1190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03884
    [49] Soriani A, Zingoni A, Cerboni C, et al. (2009) ATM-ATR-dependent up-regulation of DNAM-1 and NKG2D ligands on multiple myeloma cells by therapeutic agents results in enhanced NK-cell susceptibility and is associated with a senescent phenotype. Blood 113: 3503-3511. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-08-173914
    [50] Groh V, Bahram S, Bauer S, et al. (1996) Cell stress-regulated human major histocompatibility complex class I gene expressed in gastrointestinal epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 12445-12450. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.22.12445
    [51] Li H, Lakshmikanth T, Garofalo C, et al. (2011) Pharmacological activation of p53 triggers anticancer innate immune response through induction of ULBP2. Cell Cycle 10: 3346-3358. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.19.17630
    [52] Textor S, Fiegler N, Arnold A, et al. (2011) Human NK cells are alerted to induction of p53 in cancer cells by upregulation of the NKG2D ligands ULBP1 and ULBP2. Cancer Res 71: 5998-6009. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3211
    [53] Moretta L, Biassoni R, Bottino C, et al. (2002) Human NK cells and their receptors. Microbes Infect 4: 1539-1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1286-4579(02)00037-0
    [54] Gleimer M, Parham P (2003) Stress management: MHC class I and class I-like molecules as reporters of cellular stress. Immunity 19: 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00272-3
    [55] Baychelier F, Vieillard V (2013) The modulation of the cell-cycle: a sentinel to alert the NK cells of dangers. Front Immunol 4: 325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00325
    [56] Parsons MS, Richard J, Lee WS, et al. (2016) NKG2D Acts as a Co-Receptor for Natural Killer Cell-Mediated Anti-HIV-1 Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity. AIDS Res Human Retroviru 32: 1089-1096. https://doi.org/10.1089/AID.2016.0099
    [57] Ward J, Davis Z, DeHart J, et al. (2009) HIV-1 Vpr triggers natural killer cell-mediated lysis of infected cells through activation of the ATR-mediated DNA damage response. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000613
    [58] Richard J, Sindhu S, Pham TN, et al. (2010) HIV-1 Vpr up-regulates expression of ligands for the activating NKG2D receptor and promotes NK cell-mediated killing. Blood 115: 1354-1363. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-08-237370
    [59] Castillo JP, Frame FM, Rogoff HA, et al. (2005) Human cytomegalovirus IE1-72 activates ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase and a p53/p21-mediated growth arrest response. J Virol 79: 11467-11475. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.17.11467-11475.2005
    [60] Xiaofei E, Pickering MT, Debatis M, et al. (2011) An E2F1-mediated DNA damage response contributes to the replication of human cytomegalovirus. PLoS Pathog 7: e1001342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001342
    [61] Pignoloni B, Fionda C, Dell'Oste V, et al. (2016) Distinct roles for human cytomegalovirus immediate early proteins IE1 and IE2 in the transcriptional regulation of MICA and PVR/CD155 expression. J Immunol 197: 4066-4078. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1502527
    [62] Lodoen M, Ogasawara K, Hamerman JA, et al. (2003) NKG2D-mediated natural killer cell protection against cytomegalovirus is impaired by viral gp40 modulation of retinoic acid early inducible 1 gene molecules. J Exp Med 197: 1245-1253. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20021973
    [63] Lodoen MB, Abenes G, Umamoto S, et al. (2004) The cytomegalovirus m155 gene product subverts natural killer cell antiviral protection by disruption of H60-NKG2D interactions. J Exp Med 200: 1075-1081. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20040583
    [64] Krmpotic A, Hasan M, Loewendorf A, et al. (2005) NK cell activation through the NKG2D ligand MULT-1 is selectively prevented by the glycoprotein encoded by mouse cytomegalovirus gene m145. J Exp Med 201: 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20041617
    [65] Hasan M, Krmpotic A, Ruzsics Z, et al. (2005) Selective down-regulation of the NKG2D ligand H60 by mouse cytomegalovirus m155 glycoprotein. J Virol 79: 2920-2930. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.79.5.2920-2930.2005
    [66] Wilkinson GW, Tomasec P, Stanton RJ, et al. (2008) Modulation of natural killer cells by human cytomegalovirus. J Clin Virol 41: 206-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2007.10.027
    [67] Rossini G, Cerboni C, Santoni A, et al. (2012) Interplay between human cytomegalovirus and intrinsic/innate host responses: A complex bidirectional relationship. Mediators Inflammation 2012: 607276. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/607276
    [68] Fielding CA, Aicheler R, Stanton RJ, W, et al. (2014) Two novel human cytomegalovirus NK cell evasion functions target MICA for lysosomal degradation. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004058
    [69] Dunn C, Chalupny NJ, Sutherland CL, et al. (2003) Human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein UL16 causes intracellular sequestration of NKG2D ligands, protecting against natural killer cell cytotoxicity. J Exp Med 197: 1427-1439. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20022059
    [70] Welte SA, Sinzger C, Lutz SZ, et al. (2003) Selective intracellular retention of virally induced NKG2D ligands by the human cytomegalovirus UL16 glycoprotein. Eur J Immunol 33: 194-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/immu.200390022
    [71] Müller S, Zocher G, Steinle A, et al. (2010) Structure of the HCMV UL16-MICB complex elucidates select binding of a viral immunoevasin to diverse NKG2D ligands. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000723. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000723
    [72] Ashiru O, Bennett NJ, Boyle LH, et al. (2009) NKG2D ligand MICA is retained in the cis-Golgi apparatus by human cytomegalovirus protein UL142. J Virol 83: 12345-12354. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01175-09
    [73] Bennett NJ, Ashiru O, Morgan FJ, P, et al. (2010) Intracellular sequestration of the NKG2D ligand ULBP3 by human cytomegalovirus. J Immunol 185: 1093-1102. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1000789
    [74] Cerboni C, Neri F, Casartelli N, et al. (2007) Human immunodeficiency virus 1 Nef protein downmodulates the ligands of the activating receptor NKG2D and inhibits natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J General Virol 88: 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.82125-0
    [75] Thomas M, Boname JM, Field S, et al. (2008) Down-regulation of NKG2D and NKp80 ligands by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus K5 protects against NK cell cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 1656-1661. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707883105
    [76] Zdrenghea MT, Telcian AG, Laza-Stanca V, et al. (2012) RSV infection modulates IL-15 production and MICA levels in respiratory epithelial cells. Eur Respiratory J 39: 712-720. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00099811
    [77] Reilly RB, Ramdour SK, Fuhlbrigge ME, et al. (2024) An altered natural killer cell immunophenotype characterizes clinically severe pediatric RSV infection. Sci Transl Med 16: eado6606. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.ado6606
    [78] Fernández-Soto D, García-Jiménez ÁF, Casasnovas JM, et al. (2024) Elevated levels of cell-free NKG2D-ligands modulate NKG2D surface expression and compromise NK cell function in severe COVID-19 disease. Front Immunol 15: 1273942. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1273942
    [79] Azzi T, Lünemann A, Murer A, et al. (2014) Role for early-differentiated natural killer cells in infectious mononucleosis. Blood 124: 2533-2543. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-01-553024
    [80] Desimio MG, Covino DA, Cancrini C, et al. (2024) Entry into the lytic cycle exposes EBV-infected cells to NK cell killing via upregulation of the MICB ligand for NKG2D and activation of the CD56bright and NKG2A+KIR+CD56dim subsets. Front Immunol 15: 1467304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1467304
    [81] Pappworth IY, Wang EC, Rowe M (2007) The switch from latent to productive infection in epstein-barr virus-infected B cells is associated with sensitization to NK cell killing. J Virol 81: 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01777-06
    [82] Williams LR, Quinn LL, Rowe M, et al. (2015) Induction of the lytic cycle sensitizes epstein-barr virus-infected B cells to NK cell killing that is counteracted by virus-mediated NK cell evasion mechanisms in the late lytic cycle. J Virol 90: 947-958. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01932-15
    [83] Desimio MG, Covino DA, Rivalta B, et al. (2023) The role of NK cells in EBV infection and related diseases: Current Understanding and hints for novel therapies. Cancers 15: 1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061914
    [84] Lenart M, Kluczewska A, Szaflarska A, et al. (2021) Selective downregulation of natural killer activating receptors on NK cells and upregulation of PD-1 expression on T cells in children with severe and/or recurrent Herpes simplex virus infections. Immunobiology 226: 152097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2021.152097
    [85] Osman MS, van Eeden C, Cohen Tervaert JW (2020) Fatal COVID-19 infections: Is NK cell dysfunction a link with autoimmune HLH?. Autoimmun Rev 19: 102561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102561
    [86] Song H, Park H, Kim J, et al. (2011) IDO metabolite produced by EBV-transformed B cells inhibits surface expression of NKG2D in NK cells via the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway. Immunol Lett 136: 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2011.01.009
    [87] Doubrovina ES, Doubrovin MM, Vider E, et al. (2003) Evasion from NK cell immunity by MHC class I chain-related molecules expressing colon adenocarcinoma. J Immunol 171: 6891-6899. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.171.12.6891
    [88] Wiemann K, Mittrücker HW, Feger U, et al. (2005) Systemic NKG2D down-regulation impairs NK and CD8 T cell responses in vivo. J Immunol 175: 720-729. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.175.2.720
    [89] Waldhauer I, Steinle A (2006) Proteolytic release of soluble UL16-binding protein 2 from tumor cells. Cancer Res 66: 2520-2526. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2520
    [90] Clayton A, Mitchell JP, Court J, et al. (2008) Human tumor-derived exosomes down-modulate NKG2D expression. J Immunol 180: 7249-7258. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.180.11.7249
    [91] Vulpis E, Loconte L, Peri A, et al. (2022) Impact on NK cell functions of acute versus chronic exposure to extracellular vesicle-associated MICA: Dual role in cancer immunosurveillance. J Extracell Vesicles 11: e12176. https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12176
    [92] Mamessier E, Sylvain A, Thibult ML, et al. (2011) Human breast cancer cells enhance self tolerance by promoting evasion from NK cell antitumor immunity. J Clin Invest 121: 3609-3622. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI45816
    [93] Han B, Mao FY, Zhao YL, et al. (2018) Altered NKp30, NKp46, NKG2D, and DNAM-1 expression on circulating NK cells is associated with tumor progression in human gastric cancer. J Immunol Res 2018: 6248590. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6248590
    [94] Marcon F, Zuo J, Pearce H, et al. (2020) NK cells in pancreatic cancer demonstrate impaired cytotoxicity and a regulatory IL-10 phenotype. Oncoimmunology 9: 1845424. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1845424
    [95] von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Frank S, Leyendecker C, et al. (2010) Reduced immune effector cell NKG2D expression and increased levels of soluble NKG2D ligands in multiple myeloma may not be causally linked. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59: 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-009-0807-3
    [96] Hilpert J, Grosse-Hovest L, Grünebach F, et al. (2012) Comprehensive analysis of NKG2D ligand expression and release in leukemia: Implications for NKG2D-mediated NK cell responses. J Immunol 189: 1360-1371. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1200796
    [97] Wiesmayr S, Webber SA, Macedo C, et al. (2012) Decreased NKp46 and NKG2D and elevated PD-1 are associated with altered NK-cell function in pediatric transplant patients with PTLD. Eur J Immunol 42: 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201141832
    [98] Salih HR, Rammensee HG, Steinle A (2002) Cutting edge: Down-regulation of MICA on human tumors by proteolytic shedding. J Immunol 169: 4098-4102. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.8.4098
    [99] Cao W, Xi X, Hao Z, et al. (2007) RAET1E2, a soluble isoform of the UL16-binding protein RAET1E produced by tumor cells, inhibits NKG2D-mediated NK cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem 282: 18922-18928. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M702504200
    [100] Boutet P, Agüera-González S, Atkinson S, et al. (2009) Cutting edge: the metalloproteinase ADAM17/TNF-alpha-converting enzyme regulates proteolytic shedding of the MHC class I-related chain B protein. J Immunol 182: 49-53. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.49
    [101] Ashiru O, Boutet P, Fernández-Messina L, et al. (2010) Natural killer cell cytotoxicity is suppressed by exposure to the human NKG2D ligand MICA*008 that is shed by tumor cells in exosomes. Cancer Res 70: 481-489. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1688
    [102] Tamaki S, Kawakami M, Ishitani A, et al. (2010) Soluble MICB serum levels correlate with disease stage and survival rate in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 30: 4097-4101.
    [103] Yamaguchi K, Chikumi H, Shimizu A, et al. (2012) Diagnostic and prognostic impact of serum-soluble UL16-binding protein 2 in lung cancer patients. Cancer Sci 103: 1405-1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02330.x
    [104] Wu BJ, Li WP, Qian C, et al. (2013) Serum soluble MICB (sMICB) correlates with disease progression and survival in melanoma patients. Tumour Biol 34: 565-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0582-1
    [105] Fernández-Messina L, Ashiru O, Boutet P, et al. (2010) Differential mechanisms of shedding of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored NKG2D ligands. J Biol Chem 285: 8543-8551. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.045906
    [106] Gill S, Vasey AE, De Souza A, et al. (2012) Rapid development of exhaustion and down-regulation of eomesodermin limit the antitumor activity of adoptively transferred murine natural killer cells. Blood 119: 5758-5768. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-03-415364
    [107] Felices M, Lenvik AJ, McElmurry R, et al. (2018) Continuous treatment with IL-15 exhausts human NK cells via a metabolic defect. JCI Insight 3: e96219. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.96219
    [108] Myers JA, Schirm D, Bendzick L, et al. (2022) Balanced engagement of activating and inhibitory receptors mitigates human NK cell exhaustion. JCI Insight 7: e150079. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.150079
    [109] Alvarez M, Simonetta F, Baker J, et al. (2019) Regulation of murine NK cell exhaustion through the activation of the DNA damage repair pathway. JCI Insight 5: e127729. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.127729
    [110] Milito ND, Zingoni A, Stabile H, et al. (2023) NKG2D engagement on human NK cells leads to DNAM-1 hypo-responsiveness through different converging mechanisms. Eur J Immunol 53: 2250198. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.202250198
    [111] Hanaoka N, Jabri B, Dai Z, et al. (2010) NKG2D initiates caspase-mediated CD3zeta degradation and lymphocyte receptor impairments associated with human cancer and autoimmune disease. J Immunol 185: 5732-5742. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1002092
    [112] Santiago V, Rezvani K, Sekine T, et al. (2018) Human NK Cells Develop an Exhaustion Phenotype During Polar Degranulation at the Aspergillus fumigatus Hyphal Synapse. Front Immunol 9: 2344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02344
    [113] Bär E, Whitney PG, Moor K, et al. (2014) IL-17 regulates systemic fungal immunity by controlling the functional competence of NK cells. Immunity 40: 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.002
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(156) PDF downloads(16) Cited by(0)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog