
Dietary intervention of fucoidan extracted from Saccharina japonica brown seaweed has been ascertained to favor an increase of galectin-9 protein in the intestine of allergic mice, resulting in the attenuation of the food allergy symptoms. The molecular mechanism underpinning that galectin-9 secretion remains unclear. Recently, some evidence has suggested an implication of Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) in galectin-9 secretion. However, no investigation has been done. For this study, we aimed to understand the relationship between galectin-9 production and fucoidan intake, which will improve the therapeutic use of fucoidan in allergy treatment. Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) were cultured in solid or transwell plates and apically exposed to fucoidan solutions and/or synthetic TLR9 agonist (CpG-ODN). The transcriptional response of the cells to galectin-9 (lgals9) and the TLR9 gene was evaluated by using q-RTPCR, and the protein expression of galectin-9 was analyzed by conducting an ELISA test. Knockdown of TLR9 in IECs was performed by targeting TLR9 siRNA, and its effect on galectin-9 release was assessed. We found that the interaction of fucoidan and IECs resulted in the upregulation of galectin-9 released in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The increase was further potentiated in combination with the TLR9 agonist. Fucoidan exposure to IECs tended to increase the mRNA expression of TLR9 in a way similar to that of the TLR9 agonist effect, and knockdown of TLR9 in IECs resulted in a decreased tendency of fucoidan-induced galectin-9 protein. TLR9 activation is therefore involved in the increased release of galectin-9 protein observed in IECs upon fucoidan exposure.
Citation: Gnagnan J. E. Ezan, Masashi Mizuno. Toll-like receptor 9 is involved in the induction of galectin-9 protein by dietary anti-allergic compound fucoidan[J]. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2023, 7(1): 24-39. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2023002
[1] | Ling Wang, Shunbin Ning . “Toll-free” pathways for production of type I interferons. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(3): 143-163. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.3.143 |
[2] | Declan P. McKernan . Toll-like receptors and immune cell crosstalk in the intestinal epithelium. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2019, 3(1): 13-31. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2019.1.13 |
[3] | Issam Tout, Marie Marotel, Isabelle Chemin, Uzma Hasan . HBV and the importance of TLR9 on B cell responses. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(3): 124-137. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.3.124 |
[4] | Omer Qibi, Severine Audusseau, Andrea Mogas, Zoulfia Allakhverdi, Abdelilah Soussi Gounni, Saba Al Heialy, Qutayba Hamid . No evidence for IgE receptor FcεRI expression on bronchial epithelial cells of asthmatic patients. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(4): 165-179. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.4.165 |
[5] | Swarna Bale, John Varga, Swati Bhattacharyya . Role of RP105 and A20 in negative regulation of toll-like receptor activity in fibrosis: potential targets for therapeutic intervention. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(2): 102-126. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021009 |
[6] | Waleed M. Hussein, Phil M. Choi, Cheng Zhang, Emma Sierecki, Wayne Johnston, Zhongfan Jia, Michael J. Monteiro, Mariusz Skwarczynski, Yann Gambin, Istvan Toth . Investigating the affinity of poly tert-butyl acrylate toward Toll-Like Receptor 2. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(3): 141-147. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.3.141 |
[7] | Chunyan Li, Wojciech Dawicki, Xiaobei Zhang, Chris Rudulier, John R. Gordon . IL-10- and retinoic acid-induced regulatory dendritic cells are therapeutically equivalent in mouse models of asthma and food allergy. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(2): 73-91. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021007 |
[8] | Manal Alkan, Fadel Sayes, Abdulraouf Ramadan, Francois Machavoine, Michel Dy, Elke Schneider, Nathalie Thieblemont . Basophil activation through TLR2 and TLR4 signaling pathways. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(3): 126-140. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.3.126 |
[9] | McKenna S. Vininski, Sunanda Rajput, Nicholas J. Hobbs, Joseph J. Dolence . Understanding sex differences in the allergic immune response to food. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2022, 6(3): 90-105. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2022009 |
[10] | Shkar Rzgar K. Rostam, Khattab Ahmed Mustafa Shekhany, Harem Othman Smail . Prevalence of common food allergies in Erbil Province, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2020, 4(4): 117-127. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2020010 |
Dietary intervention of fucoidan extracted from Saccharina japonica brown seaweed has been ascertained to favor an increase of galectin-9 protein in the intestine of allergic mice, resulting in the attenuation of the food allergy symptoms. The molecular mechanism underpinning that galectin-9 secretion remains unclear. Recently, some evidence has suggested an implication of Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) in galectin-9 secretion. However, no investigation has been done. For this study, we aimed to understand the relationship between galectin-9 production and fucoidan intake, which will improve the therapeutic use of fucoidan in allergy treatment. Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) were cultured in solid or transwell plates and apically exposed to fucoidan solutions and/or synthetic TLR9 agonist (CpG-ODN). The transcriptional response of the cells to galectin-9 (lgals9) and the TLR9 gene was evaluated by using q-RTPCR, and the protein expression of galectin-9 was analyzed by conducting an ELISA test. Knockdown of TLR9 in IECs was performed by targeting TLR9 siRNA, and its effect on galectin-9 release was assessed. We found that the interaction of fucoidan and IECs resulted in the upregulation of galectin-9 released in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The increase was further potentiated in combination with the TLR9 agonist. Fucoidan exposure to IECs tended to increase the mRNA expression of TLR9 in a way similar to that of the TLR9 agonist effect, and knockdown of TLR9 in IECs resulted in a decreased tendency of fucoidan-induced galectin-9 protein. TLR9 activation is therefore involved in the increased release of galectin-9 protein observed in IECs upon fucoidan exposure.
“Fucoidan” is the name given to the group of fucose-rich sulfated polysaccharides extracted from the cell wall of seaweed algae of the Phaeophyceae class [1],[2]. It is a complex class of macro polysaccharides with heterogeneous structures varying according to the species (variation among the same species has also been observed), the geological area of production, the season of harvest and the extraction method applied (hot-water, alkaline, enzyme-assisted extraction) [3]–[5]. Several studies have been conducted on its biological properties and revealed diverse bioactivities such as anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, immunomodulatory, anti-allergic effects, ect [6]–[8]. Thus, increasing the interest in fucoidan in the medical research field. The anti-allergic effect of fucoidan has been depicted in numerous research studies. For instance, Herath et al., in their research, showed that oral consumption of fucoidan from Undaria pinnatifida attenuated allergic airway inflammation in mice by curbing key features of the allergic reaction, such as inflammatory cell infiltration, goblet cell hyperplasia, IgE production, mast cell degranulation, etc. [9]. Also, other reported anti-allergic actions of fucoidans include the promotion of the Th1 immune response over the Th2 response, increase in the number of Treg cells, impact on B cell class switching to IgE and promotion of the induction of INF-γ, IL-2 and IL-12 [10]–[13]. Recently, fucoidan extracted from Saccharina japonica was ascertained to have a protective effect on allergic mice by favoring an upregulation of galectin-9 protein in the intestine [14],[15]. Galectin-9 is a lectin protein known to neutralize IgE bound on mast cells, thus preventing their degranulation and release of contents [16]. Interestingly, the authors also revealed that the anti-allergic potential only took place upon oral administration of fucoidan [14], emphasizing then the importance of the intestinal system in the induction of galectin-9 protein. However, the underpinning mechanism of fucoidan-mediated galectin-9 upregulation has not been elucidated and remains unclear.
It has been reported that fucoidan is poorly or not absorbed by the body [17],[18], suggesting that receptors present on the intestinal monolayer may serve as a carrier for galectin-9 induction under its effect. Converging toward this idea, recent pieces of evidence suggest the involvement of Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) in the secretion of galectin-9 by intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) [19]–[24]. TLR9, primarily described as an endosomal receptor that recognizes specific sequences of DNA bacteria, named CpG DNA, has been revised and is nowadays found to be expressed as well at the membrane of several cell types, like human tonsil cells, splenic dendritic cells, peritoneal mast cells and IECs [25]–[29]. The research study results of de Kivit et al. notably showed that apical activation of TLR9 on IECs using CpG ODN (mimicking bacterial CpG DNA) induced galectin-9 release, which attenuated the food allergy symptoms in allergic mice [19],[20]. Moreover, that secretion was increased in combination with non-digestible oligosaccharides [20],[21]. Later, distinct reports also substantiated their observation [22]–[24]. Fucoidan from Saccharina japonica increased galectin-9 protein expression in IECs in vivo [14],[15]. But, whether it is through the novel TLR9/galectin-9 pathway remains to be elucidated. Fucoidan is well known to be internalized by Class A scavenger receptors (SR-A) [30],[31], which can trigger intracellular signaling events in cooperation with some pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as TLR4 and TLR9 [31]. Furthermore, fucoidan treatment has recently been shown to upregulate genes involved in the signaling of several nucleic acid-sensing receptors, such as the retinoic acid-inducible gene I-like receptor (RLR), toll-like receptor (TLR), nod-like receptor (NLR) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) [32], as well as to mimic DNA in solution [33]. Some fucoidans were also reported to be independent ligands of TLR2 and TLR4 [34].
Therefore, based on all the facts aforementioned, we hypothesized that TLR9 may play a role in the upregulation of galectin-9 in the intestine upon fucoidan intake. As expected, fucoidan-induced galectin-9 secretion involved TLR9 activation. Overall, this study serves to highlight the underpinning mechanism of galectin-9 upregulation consequent to fucoidan intake.
Fucoidan preparation was performed as previously described [14] with little modification. Blades of Saccharina japonica seaweed were ground into fine particles and stirred in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.6) overnight at 4 °C. The polysaccharide in the supernatant was precipitated with a large volume of absolute ethanol, collected after lyophilization and later subjected to anion-exchange chromatographic purification (Toyopearl DEAE-650M from Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) and gel filtration chromatography (Sephacryl S-400 HR) to obtain fucoidan.
Human IEC line, HT-29 cells purchased from ATCC (HTB-38, passages number 3-16) were cultured in a 75-cm2 flask in McCoy's 5A medium modified (Gibco BRL, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, UT, USA), streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and penicillin (100 U/mL). The cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C, 5% CO2. At 80% confluence, the cells' medium was removed and the cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), detached from the flask by adding trypsin and then centrifuged. The collected cells were further appropriately grown in different plates and transwells according to experimental designs. Hence, HT-29 cells were grown in 96 well plates, six well plates and 12 transwell insert filters (Corning, NY, USA) for cytotoxicity testing, transcriptional analysis and protein expression evaluation of galectin-9, respectively.
The cell viability of HT-29 cells exposed to fucoidan was determined via 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay for cytotoxicity, as described by Mosmann [35], with little modification. Practically, HT-29 cells seeded in 96 well plates (100 µL of 5×104 cells/well) were exposed to different concentrations of fucoidan solution (0.25%, 0.5% or 1% w/v) prepared in McCoy's 5A medium for 24 hours of incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Following stimulation of the cells with the different test samples, the fucoidan solutions were removed and MTT solution (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) was added to the cells for 4 h of incubation. Thereafter, dimethyl sulfoxide was added to the cells after removing the MTT solution and the cells were incubated again under the same conditions for 10 min. The absorbance of the solution was measured at 570 nm with a microplate reader (SH-9000, Corona electric, Japan), and the percentage of cell viability was calculated using the formula below (Eq 1).
HT-29 cells were cultured on six well-flat bottom plates. After reaching confluence, the cells were incubated with fucoidan solutions (0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2% w/v) and/or a TLR9 agonist, CpG-ODN (ODN M362, InvivoGen, USA) for 24 h. Then, the medium was removed and the cells were washed with PBS. The total RNA of the cells was extracted and q-RTPCR was performed to analyze the mRNA expression of galectin-9 and TLR9 in IECs. HT-29 cells were also cultured on 12 transwell inserts (0.4 µm; 12-mm diameter insert) and apically exposed to either fucoidan solutions (% w/v) and/or CpG-ODN (7 µM) for 24 h. The medium in the lower chamber of the transwell, referred to as a conditioned basolateral medium, was collected to analyze the protein expression of galectin-9 by applying an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, the kinetics of galectin-9 released by IECs were investigated by incubating the cells with fucoidan solution at 0.1% w/v for 6, 12, 24 and 48 h.
IEC transcriptional response to galectin-9 and the TLR9 gene was analyzed by performing q-RTPCR. Cells were harvested and total RNA extraction was performed using Sepasol-RNA I Super G (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) coupled to chloroform/isopropanol precipitation. cDNA was synthesized by using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA), following the manufacturer's standard protocol. The RT reaction was performed in a T100 thermal cycler (BIO-RAD, Singapore). The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed by using a 7500 Fast-Time PCR system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) with a Fast Start Universal Probe Master (ROX) (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The conditions of the PCR system were set to 95 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. The TaqMan probes (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) used were referenced as follows: human Galectin-9 Assay ID: Hs00371321_m1; human TLR9 Assay ID: Hs00152973_m1 and human GAPDH Assay ID: Hs99999905_m1 (housekeeping gene). Gene expressions were normalized by using GAPDH and analyzed by following a ΔΔCT quantification method.
Galectin-9 protein was assessed in the conditioned basolateral media of the transwell by ELISA. Pairs of monoclonal anti-human galectin-9 antibodies from RαD system (Minneapolis, USA) were used in this experiment. High-binding-capacity ELISA plates (Greiner bio-one, Solingen, Germany) were coated with monoclonal galectin-9 capture antibodies (0.75 µg/mL) in PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The plate was then washed with PBST (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20), blocked for 2 h with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution prepared in PBST and thereafter washed and incubated with the different test samples (basolateral conditioned medium) for 2 h. Following the incubation, and an additional washing step, biotinylated anti-human galectin-9 detection antibody (0.75 µg/mL) was added for 1 h. The plate was incubated with streptavidin-HRP (1:500 dilution), followed by development with tetramethylbenzidine. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 2 M H2SO4 and the optical density was measured at 450 nm. A standard curve was performed by using recombinant human galectin-9 protein (RαD system, Minneapolis, USA).
Silencing of TLR9 in HT-29 cells was performed as previously reported [36], with some modifications. HT-29 cells were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen) and TLR9 siRNA (Thermofischer, code product: 4392420) for 48 h. Briefly, the cells were transfected at 40% confluence by smooth addition of siRNA lipocomplexes at final concentrations of 25 and 50 nM; they were prepared in an OptiMEM medium (Gibco BRL, NY, USA), following manufacturer instructions. The absence of siRNA treatment (mock) was included as a control. Subsequently, the cells were stimulated with CpG-ODN (7µM) as a positive control and effective knockdown of TLR9 was confirmed in cell lysates by q-RTPCR. The same TLR9 silencing procedure was carried out in transwell experiments; the impact of TLR9 knockdown on galectin-9 release upon fucoidan was assessed by quantitative analysis of galectin-9 protein in the conditioned basolateral medium with ELISA.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). All statistical analyses were performed by Tukey–Kramer testing. P-values below 0.05 (*P < 0.05) and P-values below 0.01 (**P < 0.01) were considered significant.
The colorimetric assay of MTT analyzes the cell viability by monitoring their mitochondrial activity to metabolize MTT product into formazan, a purple derivative. Cytotoxicity evaluation of fucoidan on HT-29 cells assessed by MTT assay showed no toxicity at concentrations below 1% w/v (Figure 1). Therefore, fucoidan concentrations below 1% w/v were selected for the following experiments.
It was reported that oral administration of fucoidan to mice favored galectin-9 protein induction in vivo, which was a paramount mechanism to the anti-allergic effect of the fucoidan extract [14],[15]. Indeed, the intravenous injection of anti-galectin-9 antibody to fucoidan-fed-allergic mice abrogated fucoidan's suppression of the allergic symptoms in mice. Moreover, the anti-allergy effect took place only when the mice received fucoidan by gastric gavage [14],[15], emphasizing the important role played by the intestinal system in galectin-9 induction. Studies have shown that fucoidan, because of its physicochemical properties, can hardly be degraded by intestinal enzymes and can therefore be present in all its integrity in the lumen of the intestinal tract with good stability [37]. Therefore, to investigate the induction of galectin-9 in vitro, HT-29 cells were apically exposed to different concentrations of fucoidan solution (Figure 2). The galectin-9 mRNA (lgals9) level tended to increase upon direct exposure to fucoidan (Figure 3a), albeit not significantly. IECs are at the cross-borders between dietary foods in the lumen and immune cells present in the lamina propria. This bi-interface of IECs was mimicked here by using transwell plates, where IECs were seeded in an apical side of the transwell, and fucoidan solutions were apically applied to them while the lower chamber was filled with the medium (basolateral medium). In the conditioned basolateral mediums, galectin-9 protein expression significantly increased with increasing concentration of fucoidan applied to the cells, showing a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3b). In addition, the time of fucoidan stimulation on IECs affected the secretion of galectin-9. An increase in the time was noted to favor a higher release of galectin-9 by IECs (Figure 3c). Taken together, these data suggest that stimulation with a fucoidan concentration of 0.1% w/v for 24 h is the optimal condition for observing the effect of fucoidan on galectin-9 secretion by IECs. It was ascertained that fucoidan can directly promote galectin-9 induction in IECs.
Fucoidan is prebiotic; it has been shown to impact gut microbiota [38],[39]. And, recently, it was evidenced that galectin-9 secretion by IECs is involved in the immunomodulatory effect of several prebiotics, such as short-chain galacto-oligosaccharides/long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides and 2′-fucosyllactose, in synergetic action with bacterial DNA [20]–[24]. In in vitro studies, bacterial DNA is often mimicked by the use of CpG-ODN, resembling the palindromic CpG-DNA sequence, a cytosine-phosphate-guanine dinucleotide (CpG) motif found abundantly in bacterial DNA, which is responsible for the immunostimulatory activity of probiotics [40]. To evaluate a plausible synergetic effect of fucoidan and bacteria trigger (mimicking in vitro by the use of CpG-ODN) in the induction of galectin-9, the cells, seeded in a transwell plate, were apically exposed to either fucoidan solution (0.1%) or CpG-ODN (7µM) alone, or to a combined solution of fucoidan and CpG-ODN, for 24 h. Apical ligation of TLR9 on IECs by its ligand CpG-ODN resulted in a significant upregulation of galectin-9 protein. The combined exposure of CpG-ODN and fucoidan twice induced the release of galectin-9 protein, showing a synergetic effect (Figure 4).
To examine the role of TLR9 in fucoidan-mediated galectin-9 release, we first evaluated the expression of TLR9 in IECs following fucoidan exposure. The mRNA expression of TLR9 in IECs tended to increase upon apical fucoidan stimulation. Likewise, stimulation of the cells with CpG-ODN, a TLR9 agonist, tended to increase the TLR9 mRNA expression (Figure 5a). Effective knockdown of TLR9 using TLR9 siRNA was established with a 40% decrease in the mRNA expression of TLR9 as compared to the positive control cells (cells stimulated with TLR9 agonist) (Figure 5b). To assess the impact of TLR9 knockdown on fucoidan-mediated galectin-9 upregulation, transfected cells with TLR9 siRNA were subsequently stimulated with fucoidan and galectin-9 protein in the conditioned basolateral medium; the result was quantified by ELISA. A decreased tendency of galectin-9 released as an effect of fucoidan was observed, showing an implication of TLR9 in fucoidan-mediated galectin-9 upregulation on IECs (Figure 5c).
The fucoidan contained in Saccharina japonica is composed of fucose and sulfated fucose [15]. Preceding studies have demonstrated in vivo the induction of galectin-9 protein in the intestine following oral intake of fucoidan [14],[15]. In this novel study, the induction of galectin-9 by fucoidan was assessed in vitro. Consistently, galectin-9 released by IECs significantly increased upon fucoidan stimulation, suggesting that, when reaching the intestine, fucoidan may directly interact with the intestinal epithelium cells, resulting in the upregulation of galectin-9 protein. Moreover, the increase in the dose and time of exposure resulted in a higher release of galectin-9, highlighting a dose- and time-dependency effect. These two parameters should therefore be taken into account in fucoidan therapeutic strategies.
TLR9 belongs to the family of pattern recognition receptors and is expressed on endothelium, epithelium and immune cells [41]. Its canonical pathway to activation is reported to first involve the recruitment of myeloid differentiation primary response 88 adaptor protein to the TIR domain. This initiates a cascade event comprising the engagement of further adaptor proteins, such as IRAKs, TRAFs and IKKs, leading to activation of transcription factors NF-kb, AP-1 and IRF-7, as well as the induction of either proinflammatory molecules or type I interferons [42],[43]. In IECs, though, the signaling of TLR9 appears to be more complex. As such, Lee et al. observed that chloroquine and bafilomycin A1, which are distinct endosomal inhibitors that neutralize the acidic pH that is vital for the proper maturation of TLR9 endosomes, were ineffective in impeding TLR9-mediated activation of NF-κβ in IECs [25]. This fact pointed out the existence of a signaling pathway that is different from the aforementioned pathway for IECs. In addition, surface expression of TLR9 at similar levels was confirmed by different means (flow cytometry, confocal microscopy imaging and vectorial biotinylation) at both the apical and basolateral faces of IECs. Apical activation directed an anti-inflammatory effect, while the latter promoted an inflammatory response [25].
Recently, a non-canonical TLR9/galectin-9 pathway in IECs has emerged, opening new perspectives on the functionality of this receptor and challenging the amphoteric knowledge on this receptor. The fucoidan induction of galectin-9 in this study, upon apical stimuli of IECs, was associated with a trendy increase of TLR9 mRNA expression similar to the effect of the TLR9 agonist. In addition, the apical ligation of TLR9 on IECs by its agonist also favored the secretion of the galectin-9 protein, which was even potentiated by combined exposure with fucoidan. These results are consistent with several reports unveiling a synergetic effect of a TLR9 agonist with other non-digestible oligosaccharides in the galectin-9 released by IECs [20]–[24]. The precise mechanism beyond the synergetic effect is, to date, unclear, but, regarding fucoidan, several plausible explanations could be formulated. Some reports mentioned that fucoidan can be internalized by SR-A, which may trigger the intracellular signaling of some PRRs, notably TLR9 [31]. In that line, a recent study showed that fucoidan's treatment upregulated genes involved in the signaling of several nucleic acid-sensing receptors, such as RLR, TLR, NLR and STING [32]. Moreover, it is not excluded that fucoidan may interact directly with TLR9, independently of an association with SR-A. Yamazaki et al. showed that fucoidan mimics DNA in solution [33], and Makarenkovaa et al. showed fucoidan polysaccharides to be independent ligands of TLR2 and TLR4 [34]. In this study, we observed that increasing the knockdown of TLR9 on HT-29 cells further resulted in a gradual decrease of galectin-9 secretion and tended to downregulate the upregulation observed upon fucoidan exposure. Taken together, these results strongly imply that TLR9 is involved in the increase in galectin-9 and basal secretion upon exposure to fucoidan on IECs. Knowledge of TLR9 is far from complete, and the complexity of this receptor, linked to intense variability in its cellular localization (intracellular or surface expression), cell trafficking, cell-type dependency and even trigger-type dependency [44],[45] have just begun to be analyzed.
The results of this study provide new insight into how fucoidan potentiates galectin-9 increase in mice, as well as completes the understanding of the fucoidan anti-allergic mechanism. A graphical overview is notably presented below (Figure 6). Galectin-9 upregulation appeared to result from both the direct interaction of fucoidan with IECs and a synergetic effect with probiotic DNA. In addition, this study is a piece of additional evidence for the existence of the TLR-9/galectin-9 pathway in IECs, which stands as a promising path for the resorption of allergy disease. Advances in molecular biology techniques will surely allow for deeper investigations into TLR9 signalization on IECs leading to galectin-9 upregulation.
[1] |
Li B, Lu F, Wei X, et al. (2008) Fucoidan: structure and bioactivity. Molecules 13: 1671-1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13081671 ![]() |
[2] |
Dobrinčić A, Balbino S, Zorić Z, et al. (2020) Advanced technologies for the extraction of marine brown algal polysaccharides. Mar Drugs 18: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18030168 ![]() |
[3] |
Ale MT, Meyer AS (2013) Fucoidans from brown seaweeds: an update on structures, extraction techniques and use of enzymes as tools for structural elucidation. RSC Adv 3: 8131-8141. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA23373A ![]() |
[4] |
Liu J, Wu SY, Chen L, et al. (2020) Different extraction methods bring about distinct physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of Sargassum fusiforme fucoidans. Int J Biol Macromol 155: 1385-1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.113 ![]() |
[5] |
Ale MT, Mikkelsen JD, Meyer AS (2011) Important determinants for fucoidan bioactivity: A critical review of structure-function relations and extraction methods for fucose-containing sulfated polysaccharides from brown seaweeds. Mar Drugs 9: 2106-2130. https://doi.org/10.3390/md9102106 ![]() |
[6] |
Zhu Q, Chen J, Li Q, et al. (2016) Antitumor activity of polysaccharide from Laminaria japonica on mice bearing H22 liver cancer. Int J Biol Macromol 92: 156-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.090 ![]() |
[7] |
Peng Y, Song Y, Wang Q, et al. (2019) In vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory effects of fucoidan compound agents. Int J Biol Macromol 127: 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.197 ![]() |
[8] |
Luan F, Zou J, Rao Z (2021) Polysaccharides from Laminaria japonica: an insight into the current research on structural features and biological properties. Food Funct 12: 4254-4283. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1FO00311A ![]() |
[9] |
Herath KHINM, Kim HJ, Kim A, et al. (2020) The role of fucoidans isolated from the sporophylls of undaria pinnatifida against particulate-matter-induced allergic airway inflammation: Evidence of the attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. Molecules 25: 2869. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122869 ![]() |
[10] | Yang CH, Tian JJ, Ko WS, et al. (2019) Oligo-fucoidan improved unbalance the Th1/Th2 and Treg/Th17 ratios in asthmatic patients: An ex vivo study. Exp Ther Med 17: 3-10. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6939 |
[11] |
Tomori M, Nagamine T, Miyamoto T, et al. (2019) Evaluation of the immunomodulatory effects of fucoidan derived from Cladosiphon okamuranus Tokida in mice. Mar Drugs 17: 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17100547 ![]() |
[12] |
Yanase Y, Hiragun T, Uchida K, et al. (2009) Peritoneal injection of fucoidan suppresses the increase of plasma IgE induced by OVA-sensitization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 387: 435-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.031 ![]() |
[13] |
Vo TS (2020) The role of algal fucoidans in potential anti-allergic therapeutics. Int J Biol Macromol 165: 1093-1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.252 ![]() |
[14] |
Tanino Y, Hashimoto T, Ojima T, et al. (2016) F-fucoidan from Saccharina japonica is a novel inducer of galectin-9 and exhibits anti-allergic activity. J Clin Biochem Nutr 59: 25-30. https://doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.15-144 ![]() |
[15] |
Mizuno M, Sakaguchi K, Sakane I (2020) Oral administration of fucoidan can exert anti-allergic activity after allergen sensitization by enhancement of galectin-9 secretion in blood. Biomolecules 10: 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020258 ![]() |
[16] |
Niki T, Tsutsui S, Hirose S, et al. (2009) Galectin-9 is a high affinity ige-binding lectin with anti-allergic effect by blocking ige-antigen complex formation. J Biol Chem 284: 32344-32352. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.035196 ![]() |
[17] |
Nagamine N, Nakazato K, Tomioka S, et al. (2015) Intestinal absorption of fucoidan extracted from the brown seaweed, Cladosiphon okamuranus. Mar Drugs 13: 48-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13010048 ![]() |
[18] |
Tokita Y, Nakajima K, Mochida H, et al. (2010) Development of a fucoidan-specific antibody and measurement of fucoidan in serum and urine by sandwich ELISA. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74: 350-357. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.90705 ![]() |
[19] |
de Kivit S, Saeland E, Kraneveld AD, et al. (2012) Galectin-9 induced by dietary synbiotics is involved in suppression of allergic symptoms in mice and humans. Allergy 67: 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02771.x ![]() |
[20] |
de Kivit S, Kraneveld AD, Knippels LMJ, et al. (2013) Intestinal epithelium-derived galectin-9 is involved in the immunomodulating effects of nondigestible oligosaccharides. J Innate Immun 5: 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1159/000350515 ![]() |
[21] |
de Kivit S, Kostadinova AI, Kerperien J, et al. (2017) Galectin-9 produced by intestinal epithelial cells enhances aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in dendritic cells in a PI3K- and p38-dependent manner. J Innate Immun 9: 609-620. https://doi.org/10.1159/000479817 ![]() |
[22] |
Overbeek SA, Kostadinova AI, Boks MA, et al. (2019) Combined exposure of activated intestinal epithelial cells to nondigestible oligosaccharides and CpG-ODN suppresses Th2-associated CCL22 release while enhancing galectin-9, TGFβ, and Th1 polarization. Mediators Inflamm 2019: 8456829. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8456829 ![]() |
[23] |
Ayechu-Muruzabal V, Overbeek SA, Kostadinova AI, et al. (2020) Exposure of intestinal epithelial cells to 2′-fucosyllactose and CpG enhances galectin release and instructs dendritic cells to drive Th1 and regulatory-type immune development. Biomolecules 10: 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10050784 ![]() |
[24] |
Ayechu-Muruzabal V, van de Kaa M, Mukherjee R, et al. (2022) Modulation of the epithelial-immune cell crosstalk and related galectin secretion by DP3-5 galacto-oligosaccharides and β-3′galactosyllactose. Biomolecules 12: 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030384 ![]() |
[25] |
Lee J, Mo JH, Katakura K, et al. (2006) Maintenance of colonic homeostasis by distinctive apical TLR9 signaling in intestinal epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1327-1336. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1500 ![]() |
[26] |
Ewaschuk JB, Backer JL, Churchill TA, et al. (2007) Surface expression of Toll-like receptor 9 is upregulated on intestinal epithelial cells in response to pathogenic bacterial DNA. Infect Immun 75: 2572-2579. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01662-06 ![]() |
[27] |
Eaton-Bassiri A, Dillon SB, Cunningham M, et al. (2004) Toll-like receptor 9 can be expressed at the cell surface of distinct populations of tonsils and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Infect Immun 72: 7202-7211. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.72.12.7202-7211.2004 ![]() |
[28] |
Agier J, Żelechowska P, Kozłowska E, et al. (2016) Expression of surface and intracellular Toll-like receptors by mature mast cells. Cent Eur J Immunol 41: 333-338. https://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2016.65131 ![]() |
[29] |
Onji M, Kanno A, Saitoh SI, et al. (2013) An essential role for the N-terminal fragment of Toll-like receptor 9 in DNA sensing. Nat Com 4: 1949. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2949 ![]() |
[30] |
Jin JO, Park HY, Xu Q, et al. (2009) Ligand of scavenger receptor class A indirectly induces maturation of human blood dendritic cells via production of tumor necrosis factor-α. Blood 113: 5839-5847. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-10-184796 ![]() |
[31] |
Lin Z, Tan X, Zhang Y, et al. (2020) Molecular targets and related biologic activities of fucoidan: A review. Mar Drugs 18: 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18080376 ![]() |
[32] |
Choi S, Jeon SA, Heo BY, et al. (2022) Gene set enrichment analysis reveals that fucoidan induces type I IFN pathways in BMDC. Nutrients 14: 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14112242 ![]() |
[33] |
Yamazaki Y, Nakamura Y, Nakamura T (2016) A fluorometric assay for quantification of fucoidan, a sulfated polysaccharide from brown algae. Plant Biotechnol J 33: 117-121. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.16.0217c ![]() |
[34] | Makarenkovaa ID, Logunov DY, Tukhvatulin AI, et al. (2012) Sulfated polysaccharides of brown seaweeds are ligands of Toll-like receptors. Bio Chem 6: 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990750812010118 |
[35] |
Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65: 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 ![]() |
[36] |
Ghadimi D, de Vrese M, Heller KJ, et al. (2010) Effect of natural commensal-origin DNA on Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) signaling cascade, chemokine IL-8 expression, and barrier integrity of polarized intestinal epithelial cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16: 410-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21057 ![]() |
[37] | Zhang X, Wei Z, Xue C (2021) Physicochemical properties of fucoidan and its applications as building blocks of nutraceutical delivery systems. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2021: 1-19. |
[38] | Ricós-Muñoz N, Maicas S, Pina-Pérez MC (2021) Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri growth improved under fucoidan exposure. Proceedings 70: 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods_2020-07724 |
[39] |
Shang Q, Shan X, Cai C, et al. (2016) Dietary fucoidan modulates the gut microbiota in mice by increasing the abundance of Lactobacillus and Ruminococcaceae. Food Funct 7: 3224-3232. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FO00309E ![]() |
[40] |
Hemmi H, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, et al. (2000) A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature 408: 740-745. https://doi.org/10.1038/35047123 ![]() |
[41] |
Schneberger D, Caldwell S, Kanthan R, et al. (2013) Expression of Toll-like receptor 9 in mouse and human lungs. J Anat 222: 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12039 ![]() |
[42] |
Leifer CA, Kennedy MN, Mazzoni A, et al. (2004) TLR9 is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum prior to stimulation. J Immunol 173: 1179-1183. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.1179 ![]() |
[43] |
Latz E, Schoenemeyer A, Visintin A, et al. (2004) TLR9 signals after translocating from the ER to CpG DNA in the lysosome. Nat Immunol 5: 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1028 ![]() |
[44] |
Varga MG, Lin HC (2020) The role of toll-like receptor 9 in maintaining gut homeostasis. Ann Syst Biol 3: 10-14. https://doi.org/10.17352/asb.000005 ![]() |
[45] |
Mielcarska MB, Bossowska-Nowicka M, Toka FN (2021) Cell surface expression of endosomal toll-like receptors—A necessity or a superfluous duplication?. Front Immunol 11: 620972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.620972 ![]() |
1. | Shunya Nakamura, Ken-ichiro Minato, Masashi Mizuno, Interleukin 10 and hydrogen peroxide mediate anti-allergic activity of polysaccharide from Pyropia yezoensis f. narawaensis, 2025, 308, 01418130, 142547, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142547 |