Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Recovery Mentors as continuing professional development trainers for better recognition of the epistemic value of the experiential knowledge and improved access to recovery-oriented practices

1 Research Centre of Montreal Mental Health University Institute, Montreal East Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Montreal QC, Canada
2 Program for Recovery & Community Health, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven CT, USA
3 Department of Psychiatry & Addictology, University of Montreal, Montreal QC, Canada
4 Department of Mental Health and Addictions, Montreal South-Center Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Montreal QC, Canada

topical section: Health Equity and Disparities

Objectives: To lay the groundwork for the arrival of Recovery Mentors (RMs) in some of its multidisciplinary teams, a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) conference was organized in a large public agency in the province of Quebec, Canada. The aim was to come up collectively with recommendations to improve access to recovery-oriented care and services for this vulnerable population by recognizing the epistemic value of their lived experience. Methods: A series of workshops were organized among health professionals to reflect on their practice and to discuss the role of RMs for improving epistemic equity and recognition of the experiential knowledge. In preparation for these workshops participants completed the Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA). The RSA is a 32-item questionnaire designed to gauge the degree to which programs implement recovery-oriented practices, which should notably include RMs in multidisciplinary teams (five-point Likert scale: 1= strongly disagree ; 5 = strongly agree). The interactive workshops were hosted by RMs as trainers who first shared their lived experience and understanding of recovery. Results: Eighty-height of the 105 participants completed the RSA. The highest score on the RSA was for the item Staff believe in the ability of program participants to recover (mean = 4.2/5). The lowest score was for the item People in recovery are encouraged to attend agency advisory boards and management meetings (mean = 2.2/5). Based on the average inter-item correlation, a reliability test confirmed an excellent internal consistency for the French RSA scale, with a Cronbach‘s Alpha of .9. Means and standard deviation for each item of the RSA questionnaires were calculated. The results did not differ by participant characteristics. Results to the RSA and results from the workshops that were co-hosted by RMs were reported in the plenary session and further discussed. The workshops, the RSA and the whole CPD conference raised awareness among health professionals about stigmatizing attitudes and epistemic inequity in actual service provision. Conclusion: RMs could be invited to actively participate and attend advisory boards and management meetings more frequently and on a more regular basis for ongoing quality improvement towards better access to recovery-oriented practices. This CPD conference has shown the acceptability and feasibility of including RMs as trainers for better recognition of the epistemic value of the experiential knowledge of recovery. They can help health professionals to recognize and better appreciate service users as knowers and potential contributors to knowledge.
  Article Metrics


1. Harris EC, Barraclough C (1998) Excess mortality in mental disorder. Br J Psychiatry 173: 11–53.    

2. Bloch G, Rozmovits L, Giambrone C (2011) Barriers to primary care responsiveness to poverty as a risk factor for health. BMC Fam Pract 12: 62.    

3. Price JH, Desmond SM, Snyder FF, et al. (1988) Perceptions of family practice residents regarding health care and poor patients. Fam Pract 27: 615–621.

4. Laursen TM, Munk-Olsen T, Vestergaard M (2012) Life expectancy and cardiovascular mortality in persons with schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 25: 83–88.    

5. Kisely S, Smith M, Lawrence D (2007) Inequitable access for mentally ill patients to some medically necessary procedures. CMAJ 176: 779–784.    

6. Walker E, McGee R, Druss B (2015) Mortality in mental disorders and global disease burden implications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 72: 334–341.    

7. Tait L, Lester H (2005) Encouraging user involvement in mental health services. Adv Psychiatr Treat 11: 168–175.    

8. Shefer G, Henderson C, Howard LM, et al. (2014) Diagnostic Overshadowing and Other Challenges Involved in the Diagnostic Process of Patients with Mental Illness Who Present in Emergency Departments with Physical Symptoms-A Qualitative Study. PLoS ONE 9.

9. Jones S, Howard L, Thornicroft G (2008) ‗Diagnostic overshadowing': worse physical health care for people with mental illness. Acta Psychiat Scand 118: 169–171.    

10. Reiss S, Levitan G, Szyszko J (1982) Emotional disturbance and mental retardation: diagnostic overshadowing. Am J Ment Defic 86: 567–574.

11. Giddings G (2013) Sense and sensitivity. CMAJ 185: 1555.    

12. Crichton P, Carel H, Kidd I (2017) Epistemic injustice in psychiatry. BJPsych bulletin 41: 65–70.    

13. Newbigging K, Ridley J (2018) Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health. Soc Sci Med 219: 36–44.    

14. Sunderland K, Mishkin W (2013) Guidelines for the Practice and Training of Peer Support, Calgary: Mental Health Commission of Canada.

15. van Vugt M, Kroon H, Delespaul P, et al. (2012) Consumer-Providers in Assertive Community Treatment Programs: Associations With Client Outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 63: 477–481.    

16. Mahlke C, Priebe S, Heumann K, et al. (2017) Effectiveness of one-to-one peer support for patients with severe mental illness-a randomised controlled trial. Eur Psychiatry 42: 103–110.    

17. Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L (2001) Peer support: a theoretical perspective. Psychiatr Rehabil J 25: 134–141.    

18. Felton CJ, Stastny P, Shern DL, et al. (1995) Consumers as peer specialists on intensive case management teams: impact on client outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 46: 1037–1044.    

19. Chinman M, George P, Dougherty R, et al. (2014) Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv 65: 429–441.    

20. Pelletier JF, Tourette-Turgis C (2016) Recovery-oriented Medical Training: A Narrative Literature Review for the University of Recovery as a New Concept of Co-learning between Patients and (Future) Healthcare Providers. J Community Med Health Educ 6: 495.

21. Shah HR (2015) The role of a Psychiatric Society: Aligning our aims to needs of the community. Mens Sana Monogr 13: 156–164.    

22. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec (2015) Plan d'action en santé mentale: faire ensemble et autrement. Quebec Government; Quebec City.

23. Tondora J, Davidson L (2006) Practice Guidelines for Recovery–Oriented Behavioral Health Care. Connecticut: Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.

24. O'Connell M, Tondora J, Croog G, et al. (2005) From rhetoric to routine: Assessing perceptions of recovery-oriented practices in a state mental health and addiction system. Psychiatr Rehabil J 28: 378–386.    

25. Connecticut Department of Mental Health Addiction Services (DMHAS) (2002) DMHAS Recovery Self-Assessment.

26. Knupp P (2013) The contribution of the Recovery Self Assessment to the measurement of illness management and recovery, Drake University Des Moines, Iowa.

27. Kidd S, George L, O'Connell M, et al. (2011) Recovery-oriented service provision and clinical outcomes in assertive community treatment. Psychiatr Rehabil J 34: 194–201.    

28. Salyers M, Tsai J, Stultz T (2007) Measuring recovery orientation in a hospital setting. Psychiatr Rehabil J 31: 131–137.    

29. Mueser K, Gingerich S, Salyers M, et al. (2004) The illness management and recovery (IMR) scales (client and practitioner versions). Concord, NH: Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center.

30. Campbell-Orde T, Chamberlin J, Carpenter J, et al. (2005) Measuring the Promise: A Compendium of Recovery Measures. Cambridge, MA: Human Services Research Institute.

31. Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network (2010) Review of Recovery Measures. Available from: https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/communityproviders/docs/review_recovery_measures.pdf.

32. Pelletier JF, Boisvert C, Galipeau-Leduc MC, et al. (2016) On the University of Recovery. Sante Ment Que 41: 241–250.    

33. Sowers W, Marin R (2014) A community engaged curriculum for public service psychiatry fellowship training. Community Ment Health J 50: 17–24.    

34. Agrawal S, Capponi P, López J, et al. (2016) From Surviving to Advising: A Novel Course Pairing Mental Health and Addictions Service Users as Advisors to Senior Psychiatry Residents. Acad Psychiatry 40: 475–480.    

35. Thammasitboon K, Sukotjo C, Howell H, et al. (2007) Problem-based learning at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine: self-assessment of performance in postdoctoral training. J Dent Educ 71: 1080–1089.

36. Rudnick A, Eastwood D (2013) Psychiatric rehabilitation education for physicians. Psychiatr Rehabil J 36: 126–127.    

37. Hefler J, Ramnanan C (2017) Can CanMEDS competencies be developed in medical school anatomy laboratories? A literature review. Int J Med Educ 8: 231–238.

38. Hornby P, Symon G (1994) Tracers studies, In C. Cassel et G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research: A Practical Guide, Londres, UK: Sage.

39. Ben-Tovim DI, Dougherty ML, O'Connell TJ (2008) Patient journeys: the process of clinical redesign. Med J Aust 188: S14.

40. Davidson L, Bellamy C, Guy K, et al. (2012) Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry 11: 123–128.    

41. Pelletier JF (2019) The transcendent voice of recovery mentors in mental health: a philosophical reflection. AIMS Public Health 6: 135–142.    

42. Law J (1986) Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge?, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

43. Prout A (1996) Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: an illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociol Health Illn 18: 198–219.    

44. Desai A, Zoccatelli G, Adams M, et al (2017) Taking data seriously: the value of actor-network theory in rethinking patient experience data. J Health Serv Res Pol 22: 134–136.    

45. McLean C, Hassard J (2004) Symmetrical Absence/Symmetrical Absurdity: Critical Notes on the production of Actor Network Theory. J Manag Stud 41:493–519.    

46. Doolin B, Lowe A (2002) To reveal is to critique: actor-network theory and critical information systems research. J Inf Technol 17: 69–78.    

47. Cresswell K, Worth A, Sheikh A (2010) Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 10, 67.

48. Miller Tate AJ (2019) Contributory injustice in psychiatry. J Med Ethics 45: 97–100.    

49. Fricker M (2007) Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

50. Roberts L, Bandstra B (2012) Addressing Stigma to Strengthen Psychiatric Education. Acad Psychiatry 36: 347–350.    

51. Simpson E, House A (2002) Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review. BMJ 325: 1265.    

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved