Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Impact of online, video-based wellness training on Girl Scout leaders’ wellness promotion self-efficacy, intention, and knowledge: A pilot randomized controlled trial

1 Department of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics and Health, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, 212 Justin Hall, 1324 Lovers Lane, KS 66506, United States
2 Physical Activity and Nutrition Clinical Research Consortium, 1105 Sunset Avenue, 3rd Floor, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, United States

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of tailored, online, video-based training on Girl Scout troop leaders’ wellness promotion self-efficacy, intention, and knowledge regarding physical activity and fruit and vegetable practices during troop meetings. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Thirty Girl Scouts leaders were randomized to control (CON; n = 16) or intervention (INT; n = 14) conditions. INT leaders received six online weekly training videos on implementation of physical activity (PA) and fruit and vegetable (FV) practices during troop meetings. Videos addressed leader-identified improvement areas and strategies to overcome barriers. Leaders set PA and FV goals for upcoming meetings and self-monitored their progress. Questionnaires were completed at baseline and post-intervention on leaders’ task and barrier self-efficacy, intention, and knowledge regarding meeting-time PA and FV practices. Results: INT leaders increased PA practices barrier self-efficacy (INT = 16.5 ± 24.1%, CON = −4.8 ± 21.5%; p = 0.036), vegetable practices self-efficacy (INT = 10.3 ± 13.3%, CON = −3.5 ± 28.9%; p = 0.049), and FV practices barrier self-efficacy (INT = 12.4 ± 4.6%, CON = 1.6 ± 28.7%; p = 0.036), when compared to CON leaders. There were no changes (p > 0.05) in PA or FV knowledge. Conclusions and implications: Results suggest the potential for using online video-based training for improvements in wellness-promoting practices of Girl Scout troop leaders.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords wellness promotion; nutrition; physical activity; wellness training

Citation: Brooke J. Cull, Sara K. Rosenkranz, Richard R. Rosenkranz. Impact of online, video-based wellness training on Girl Scout leaders’ wellness promotion self-efficacy, intention, and knowledge: A pilot randomized controlled trial. AIMS Public Health , 2018, 5(3): 225-234. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.225

References

  • 1. National Physical Activity Plan Alliance (2016) 2016 United States Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth, Columbia SC.
  • 2. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (PAGAC) (2008) Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report, 2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2008, A1–H14.
  • 3. Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin SL, et al. (2014) Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2013. Mmwr Surveill Summ 4: 1–168.
  • 4. Kim SA, Moore LV, Galuska D, et al. (2014) Vital signs: Fruit and vegetable intake among children-United States, 2003–2010. Mmwr Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 63: 671–676.
  • 5. Telama R (2009) Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: A review. Obes Facts 2: 187–195.    
  • 6. te Velde SJ, Twisk JWR, Brug J (2007) Tracking of fruit and vegetable consumption from adolescence into adulthood and its longitudinal association with overweight. Br J Nutr 98: 431–438.    
  • 7. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report Subcommittee of the President's Council on Fitness, Sports &Nutrition (2013) Physical activity guidelines for americans midcourse report: Strategies to increase physical activity among youth. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2012.
  • 8. Rosenkranz RR, Behrens TK, Dzewaltowski DA (2010) A group-randomized controlled trial for health promotion in Girl Scouts: Healthier troops in a SNAP (Scouting Nutrition & Activity Program). BMC Public Health 10: 81.    
  • 9. Cull BJ, Dzewaltowski DA, Guagliano JM, et al. (2018) Wellness-promoting practices through Girl Scouts: A pragmatic superiority randomized controlled trial with additional dissemination. Am J Health Promot 2018: 890117118754825.
  • 10. Bandura A (2006) Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self 5: 307–337.
  • 11. Rhodes RE, Matheson DH (2005) Discrepancies in exercise intention and expectation: Theoretical and applied issues. Psychol Health 20: 63–78.    
  • 12. Bandura A (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol 44: 1175.    
  • 13. Williams SL, French DP (2011) What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour-and are they the same? Health Educ Res 26: 308–322.    
  • 14. Campbell K, Hesketh K, Silverii A, et al. (2010) Maternal self-efficacy regarding children's eating and sedentary behaviours in the early years: Associations with children's food intake and sedentary behaviours. Int J Pediatr Obes 5: 501–508.    
  • 15. Armitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc P sychol 40: 471–499.    
  • 16. Sheeran P (2002) Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 12: 1–36.    
  • 17. Kahan S, Gielen AC, Fagan PJ, et al. (2014) Health behavior change in populations. JHU Press.
  • 18. Sawyer A, Smith L, Schrempft S, et al. (2014) Primary caregiver knowledge of paediatric physical activity recommendations in the United Kingdom and its association with caregiver behaviour: An observational study. BMC Public Health 14: 795.    
  • 19. Kreuter MW, Skinner CS (2000) Tailoring: What's in a name? Health Educ Res 15: 1–4.    
  • 20. Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, et al. (1999) Understanding how people process health information: A comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol 18: 487.    
  • 21. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ (2003) Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 27: S227–S232.    
  • 22. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS (2007) Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 133: 673.

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved