Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Comparison of Dietary Quality Assessment Using Food Frequency Questionnaire and 24-hour-recalls in Older Men and Women

Health Statistics and Geography Lab, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA

Objectives: To examine the agreement in nutrient intake and alternative healthy eating indices (AHEI) between a self-administered Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and 24-hour recall (24HR) measurements of diet by gender, among older adults. Material and methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study of 105 men and 99 women aged 65 and older living in urban and rural neighborhoods in Worcester County, Massachusetts, USA. Participants were queried on diet using both FFQ and 24HR. The healthy eating classification was compared between the two instruments by gender. Results: For men, the mean ± SD of AHEI total score was 48.2 ± 12.3 based on FFQ versus 34.7 ± 10.2 based on 24HR. For women, the mean ± SD was 47.9 ± 10.1 based on FFQ versus 36.1 ± 10.0 based on 24HR. Using 32 as the cutoff (40% of maximum AHEI score), 9% of men and 7% of women were classified as eating unhealthy based on the FFQ, versus 47% of men and 38% of women based on 24HR. Compared to women, men had larger 24HR to FFQ discrepancies in the nuts and vegetable protein subscore and white/red meat ratio, and smaller discrepancy in alcohol beverages subscore. Conclusion: Agreements between FFQ and 24HR-based measures of diet quality were roughly comparable between men and women, though slightly better for women than men. Compared to 24HR, the FFQ tended to underestimate the proportions of older men and women classified as eating unhealthy and misclassified more men than women. Such limitations should be considered when the FFQ is used to study healthy eating in older age.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. Mozaffarian D, Fried LP, Burke GL, et al. (2004) Lifestyles of older adults: can we influence cardiovascular risk in older adults? Am J Geriatr Cardio 13: 153-160.

2. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2000) The Diabetes Prevention Program: baseline characteristics of the randomized cohort. Diabetes Care 23: 1619-1629.    

3. Ma Y, Hebert JR, Balasubramanian R, et al. (2013) All-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality rates in postmenopausal white, black, Hispanic, and Asian women with and without diabetes in the United States: the Women's Health Initiative, 1993–2009. Am J Epidemiol 178: 1533-1541.

4. Geelen A, Souverein OW, Busstra MC, et al. (2015) Comparison of approaches to correct intake-health associations for FFQ measurement error using a duplicate recovery biomarker and a duplicate 24 h dietary recall as reference method. Public Health Nutr 18: 226-233.    

5. Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman L, et al. (2002) Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr 5: 915-923.

6. Keogh RH, Carroll RJ, Tooze JA, et al. (2016) Statistical issues related to dietary intake as the response variable in intervention trials. Stat Med 35: 4493-4508.

7. Reagh ZM, Roberts JM, Ly M, et al. (2014) Spatial discrimination deficits as a function of mnemonic interference in aged adults with and without memory impairment. Hippocampus 24: 303-314.    

8. Olendzki BC, Ma Y, Hebert JR, et al. (2008) Underreporting of energy intake and associated factors in a Latino population at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. J Am Diet Assoc 108: 1003-1008.    

9. Hebert JR, Ebbeling CB, Matthews CE, et al. (2002) Systematic errors in middle-aged women's estimates of energy intake: comparing three self-report measures to total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water. Ann Epidemiol 12: 577-586.

10. Nutrition Assessment Shared Resource (NASR). Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ). In. Seattle, WA, USA: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC); 2016.

11. Olendzki B, Procter-Gray E, Magee MF, et al. (2016) Racial differences in misclassification of healthy eating based on food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour dietary recalls. J Nutr Health Aging 2016: 1-12.

12. McCullough ML, Willett WC (2006) Evaluating adherence to recommended diets in adults: the Alternate Healthy Eating Index. Public Health Nutr 9: 152-157.

13. Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23: 433-441.    

14. Tinetti ME, Mendes de Leon CF, Doucette JT, et al. (1994) Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to functioning among community-living elders. J Gerontol 49: M140-147.

15. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, et al. (1988) An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 56: 893-897.

16. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1: 385-401.

17. Cyarto EV, Marshall AL, Dickinson RK, et al. (2006) Measurement properties of the CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire in a sample of older Australians. J Sci Med Sport 9: 319-326.    

18. Stewart AL, Mills KM, Sepsis PG, et al. (1997) Evaluation of CHAMPS, a physical activity promotion program for older adults. Ann Behav Med 19: 353-361.    

19. Ma Y, Olendzki BC, Pagoto SL, et al. (2009) Number of 24-hour diet recalls needed to estimate energy intake. Ann Epidemiol 19: 553-559.    

20. Schakel SF, Sievert YA, Buzzard IM (1988) Sources of data for developing and maintaining a nutrient database. J Am Diet Assoc 88: 1268-1271.

21. Sievert YA, Schakel SF, Buzzard IM (1989) Maintenance of a nutrient database for clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 10: 416-425.

22. Schakel SF (2001) Maintaining a nutrient database in a changing marketplace: Keeping pace with changing food products - A research perspective. J Food Compos Anal 14: 315-322.

23. Guenther PM, Casavale KO, Reedy J, et al. (2013) Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2010. J Acad Nutr Diet 113: 569-580.    

24. Ma Y, Pagoto SL, Griffith JA, et al. (2007) A dietary quality comparison of popular weight-loss plans. J Am Diet Assoc 107: 1786-1791.

25. Ma Y, Li W, Olendzki BC, et al. (2008) Dietary quality 1 year after diagnosis of coronary heart disease. J Am Diet Assoc 108: 246-247.    

26. Rehm CD, Penalvo JL, Afshin A, et al. (2016) Dietary Intake Among US Adults, 1999–2012. JAMA 315: 2542-2553.

27. Cespedes EM, Hu FB, Tinker L, et al. (2016) Multiple Healthful Dietary Patterns and Type 2 Diabetes in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol 183: 622-633.    

28. Kristal AR, Feng Z, Coates RJ, et al. (1997) Associations of race/ethnicity, education, and dietary intervention with the validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire: the Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations. Am J Epidemiol 146: 856-869.    

29. Lander EM, Wertheim BC, Koch SM, et al. (2016) Vegetable protein intake is associated with lower gallbladder disease risk: Findings from the Women's Health Initiative prospective cohort. Prev Med 88: 20-26.    

30. Prentice RL, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Huang Y, et al. (2011) Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol 174: 591-603.

31. Haring B, Crandall CJ, Wu C, et al. (2016) Dietary Patterns and Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: Results From the Women's Health Initiative. JAMA Intern Med 176: 645-652.

32. Li W, Youssef G, Procter-Gray E, et al. (2016) Racial differences in eating patterns and food purchasing behaviors among urban older women. J Nutr Health Aging 2016: 1-10.

33. Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Tinker LF, et al. (1999) Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 9: 178-187.    

Copyright Info: © 2017, Wenjun Li, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved