Theoretical Antecedents of Standing at Work: An Experience Sampling Approach Using the Theory of Planned Behavior

M. Renée Umstattd Meyer; Cindy Wu; Shana M. Walsh; M. Renée Umstattd Meyer; Cindy Wu; Shana M. Walsh

doi:10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.682

AIMS Public Health

2016, Volume 3, Issue 4: 682-701. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.682

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Theoretical Antecedents of Standing at Work: An Experience Sampling Approach Using the Theory of Planned Behavior

1.
Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
2.
Department of Management, Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
3.
School of Education, Peru State College, Peru, NE, USA

Received: 08 April 2016 Accepted: 30 August 2016 Published: 02 September 2016

Time spent sitting has been associated with an increased risk of diabetes, cancer, obesity, and mental health impairments. However, 75% of Americans spend most of their days sitting, with work-sitting accounting for 63% of total daily sitting time. Little research examining theory-based antecedents of standing or sitting has been conducted. This lack of solid groundwork makes it difficult to design effective intervention strategies to decrease sitting behaviors. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as our theoretical lens to better understand factors related with beneficial standing behaviors already being practiced, we examined relationships between TPB constructs and time spent standing at work among “positive deviants” (those successful in behavior change). Experience sampling methodology (ESM), 4 times a day (midmorning, before lunch, afternoon, and before leaving work) for 5 consecutive workdays (Monday to Friday), was used to assess employees’ standing time. TPB scales assessing attitude (α = 0.81–0.84), norms (α = 0.83), perceived behavioral control (α = 0.77), and intention (α = 0.78) were developed using recommended methods and collected once on the Friday before the ESM surveys started. ESM data are hierarchically nested, therefore we tested our hypotheses using multilevel structural equation modeling with Mplus. Hourly full-time university employees (n = 50; 70.6% female, 84.3% white, mean age = 44 (SD = 11), 88.2%in full-time staff positions) with sedentary occupation types (time at desk while working ≥6 hours/day) participated. A total of 871 daily surveys were completed. Only perceived behavioral control (β = 0.45, p < 0.05) was related with work-standing at the event-level (model fit: just fit); mediation through intention was not supported. This is the first study to examine theoretical antecedents of real-time work-standing in a naturalistic field setting among positive deviants. These relationships should be further examined, and behavioral intervention strategies should be guided by information obtained through this positive deviance approach to enhance perceived behavioral control, in addition to implementing environmental changes like installing standing desks
- sedentary behavior,
- worksite,
- standing desks,
- sit-stand workstations,
- workplace,
- positive deviants
Citation: M. Renée Umstattd Meyer, Cindy Wu, Shana M. Walsh. Theoretical Antecedents of Standing at Work: An Experience Sampling Approach Using the Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(4): 682-701. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.682

Related Papers:

Abstract

Time spent sitting has been associated with an increased risk of diabetes, cancer, obesity, and mental health impairments. However, 75% of Americans spend most of their days sitting, with work-sitting accounting for 63% of total daily sitting time. Little research examining theory-based antecedents of standing or sitting has been conducted. This lack of solid groundwork makes it difficult to design effective intervention strategies to decrease sitting behaviors. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as our theoretical lens to better understand factors related with beneficial standing behaviors already being practiced, we examined relationships between TPB constructs and time spent standing at work among “positive deviants” (those successful in behavior change). Experience sampling methodology (ESM), 4 times a day (midmorning, before lunch, afternoon, and before leaving work) for 5 consecutive workdays (Monday to Friday), was used to assess employees’ standing time. TPB scales assessing attitude (α = 0.81–0.84), norms (α = 0.83), perceived behavioral control (α = 0.77), and intention (α = 0.78) were developed using recommended methods and collected once on the Friday before the ESM surveys started. ESM data are hierarchically nested, therefore we tested our hypotheses using multilevel structural equation modeling with Mplus. Hourly full-time university employees (n = 50; 70.6% female, 84.3% white, mean age = 44 (SD = 11), 88.2%in full-time staff positions) with sedentary occupation types (time at desk while working ≥6 hours/day) participated. A total of 871 daily surveys were completed. Only perceived behavioral control (β = 0.45, p < 0.05) was related with work-standing at the event-level (model fit: just fit); mediation through intention was not supported. This is the first study to examine theoretical antecedents of real-time work-standing in a naturalistic field setting among positive deviants. These relationships should be further examined, and behavioral intervention strategies should be guided by information obtained through this positive deviance approach to enhance perceived behavioral control, in addition to implementing environmental changes like installing standing desks

References

[1]	Owen N, Bauman A, Brown W (2009) Too much sitting: A novel and important predictor of chronic disease risk? Br J Sports Med 43: 81-83.
[2]	Same RV, Feldman DI, Shah N, et al. (2015) Relationship between sedentary behavior and cardiovascular risk. Curr Cardiol Rep 18: 1-7.
[3]	Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. (2011) 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: A second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exercise 43: 1575-1581. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12
[4]	Sedentary Behaviour Research Network APNM (2012) Letter to the editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 37: 540-542. doi: 10.1139/h2012-024
[5]	Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, et al. (2009) Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exercise 41: 998-1005. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181930355
[6]	Patel AV, Bernstein L, Deka A, et al. (2010) Leisure time spent sitting in relation to total mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol 172: 419-429. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq155
[7]	Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, et al. (2003) Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 289: 1785-1791. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.14.1785
[8]	Healy GN, Wijndaele K, Dunstan DW, et al. (2008) Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Diabetes Care 31: 369-371. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1795
[9]	Ford ES, Kohl HW, Mokdad AH, et al. (2005) Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Obes Res 13: 608-614. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.65
[10]	Howard RA, Freedman DM, Park Y, et al. (2008) Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and the risk of colon and rectal cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Cancer Causes Control 19: 939-953. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9159-0
[11]	Gierach GL, Chang S, Brinton LA, et al. (2009) Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and endometrial cancer risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Int J Cancer 124: 2139-2147. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24059
[12]	Patel AV, Rodriguez C, Pavluck AL, et al. (2006) Recreational physical activity and sedentary behavior in relation to ovarian cancer risk in a large cohort of US women. Am J Epidemiol 163: 709-716.
[13]	Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, et al. (2010) Too much sitting: The population-health science of sedentary behavior. Exercise Sport Sci Rev 38: 105-113. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2
[14]	Physiology CSfE (2012) Canadian Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behavior Guidelines: Your Plan to Get Active Every Day.
[15]	Australian Government Department of Health. Australia’s Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines. 2014. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/health-pubhlth-strateg-phys-act-guidelines. Access date: 7/11/2016.
[16]	Healy GN, Clark BK, Winkler EAH, et al. (2011) Measurement of adults’ sedentary time in population-based studies. Am J Prev Med 41: 216-227. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.005
[17]	Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, et al. (2011) Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS ONE 6: e19657.
[18]	Parry S, Straker L (2013) The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk. BMC Public Health 13: 296. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-296
[19]	Thorp AA, Healy GN, Winkler E, et al. (2012) Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: A cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9: 128. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-128
[20]	Clemes SA, O?Connell SE, Edwardson CL (2014) Office workers? objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity during and outside working hours. J Occup Environ Med 56: 298-303.
[21]	Clemes SA, Patel R, Mahon C, et al. (2014) Sitting time and step counts in office workers. Occup Med 64: 188-192. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqt164
[22]	Jans MP, Proper KI, Hildebrandt VH (2007) Sedentary behavior in Dutch workers: Differences between occupations and business sectors. Am J Prev Med 33: 450-454. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.033
[23]	Walsh SM, Umstattd Meyer MR, Stamatis A, et al. (2015) Why women sit: Determinants of leisure sitting time for working women. Women’s Health Issues 25: 673-679. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.06.012
[24]	Neuhaus M, Eakin EG, Straker L, et al. (2014) Reducing occupational sedentary time: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on activity-permissive workstations. Obes Rev 15: 822-838. doi: 10.1111/obr.12201
[25]	Hart TL, Ainsworth BE, Tudor-Locke C (2011) Objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior and physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exercise 43: 449-456.
[26]	Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW (2007) Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes 56: 2655-2667. doi: 10.2337/db07-0882
[27]	Ebara T, Kubo T, Inoue T, et al. (2008) Effects of adjustable sit-stand VDT workstations on workers’ musculoskeletal discomfort, alertness and performance. Ind Health 46: 497-505. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.46.497
[28]	Beers EA, Roemmich JN, Epstein LH, et al. (2008) Increasing passive energy expenditure during clerical work. Eur J Appl Physiol 103: 353-360. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0713-y
[29]	Grunseit AC, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, et al. (2013) “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace. BMC Public Health 13: 365. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-365
[30]	Chu AHY, Ng SHX, Tan CS, et al. (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of workplace intervention strategies to reduce sedentary time in white-collar workers. Obes Rev 17: 467-481. doi: 10.1111/obr.12388
[31]	Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 337: a1655.
[32]	Ammerman AS, Lindquist CH, Lohr KN, et al. (2002) The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: A review of the evidence. Prev Med 35: 25-41. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1028
[33]	Prestwich A, Sniehotta FF, Whittington C, et al. (2014) Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Health Psychol 33: 465-474.
[34]	Rhodes RE, Dean RN (2009) Understanding physical inactivity: Prediction of four sedentary leisure behaviors. Leis Sci 31: 124-135. doi: 10.1080/01490400802685948
[35]	Prapavessis H, Gaston A, DeJesus S (2015) The Theory of Planned Behavior as a model for understanding sedentary behavior. Psychol Sport Exercise 19: 23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.02.001
[36]	Smith RA, Biddle S (1999) Attitudes and exercise adherence: Test of theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. J Sports Sci 17: 269-281. doi: 10.1080/026404199365993
[37]	Ickes MJ (2010) Predictors of behaviors related to obesity using the theory of planned behavior in seventh and eighth grade students. Ohio LINK: University of Cincinnati.
[38]	Lowe SS, Danielson B, Beaumont C, et al. (2015) Correlates of objectively measured sedentary behavior in cancer patients with brain metastases: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psycho-Oncology 24: 757-762.
[39]	Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Biddle SJH (2002) A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal Sport Exercise Psychol 24: 3-32. doi: 10.1123/jsep.24.1.3
[40]	McEachan RRC, Lawton RJ, Jackson C, et al. (2011) Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8: 29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-29
[41]	Ajzen I (2005) Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
[42]	Ajzen I (1985) From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Action Control. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 22: 11-39
[43]	Marsh DR, Schroeder DG, Dearden KA, et al. (2004) The power of positive deviance. BMJ 329: 1177-1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1177
[44]	Walker LO, Sterling BS, Hoke MM, et al. (2007) Applying the concept of positive deviance to public health data: A tool for reducing health disparities. Public Health Nurs 24: 571-576. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00670.x
[45]	Hektner J, Schmidt J, Csikszentmihalyi M (2007) Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[46]	Alliger GM, Williams KJ (1993) Using signal-contingent experience sampling methodology to study work in the field: A discussion and illustration examining task perceptions and mood. Pers Psychol 46: 525-549. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00883.x
[47]	American College of Sports Medicine (2013) ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[48]	Ajzen I (2006) Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. Available from: http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf. Access date: 7/11/2016.
[49]	Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2015) Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
[50]	Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, et al. (2008) Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol 167: 875-881. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm390
[51]	Sallis JF (2000) Age-related decline in physical activity: A synthesis of human and animal studies. Med Sci Sports Exercise 32: 1598-1600.
[52]	Brownson RC, Eyler AA, King AC, et al. (2000) Patterns and correlates of physical activity among U.S. women 40 years and older. Am J Public Health 90: 264-270.
[53]	Salmon J, Owen N, Bauman A, et al. (2000) Leisure-time, occupational, and household physical activity among professional, skilled, and less-skilled workers and homemakers. Prev Med 30: 191-199. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0619
[54]	Salmon J, Bauman A, Crawford D, et al. (2000) The association between television viewing and overweight among Australian adults participating in varying levels of leisure-time physical activity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24: 600-606.
[55]	LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2007) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ Res Methods 11: 815-852. doi: 10.1177/1094428106296642
[56]	Raykov T, Lee C-L, Marcoulides GA, et al. (2013) A commentary on the relationship between model fit and saturated path models in structural equation modeling applications. Educ Psychol Meas 73: 1054-1068. doi: 10.1177/0013164413487905
[57]	Godin G, Kok G (1996) The Theory of Planned Behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot 11: 87-98. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87
[58]	Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50: 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[59]	MacEwen BT, MacDonald DJ, Burr JF (2015) A systematic review of standing and treadmill desks in the workplace. Prev Med 70: 50-58.
[60]	Chau JY, Sukala W, Fedel K, et al. (2016) More standing and just as productive: Effects of a sit-stand desk intervention on call center workers’ sitting, standing, and productivity at work in the Opt to Stand pilot study. Prev Med Rep 3: 68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.12.003
[61]	Huysmans MA, van der Ploeg HP, Proper KI, et al. (2015) Is sitting too much bad for your health? Ergon Des Q Hum Factor Appl 23: 4-8.
[62]	Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, et al. (2016) Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3/full. Access date: 8/26/2016.
[63]	Clemes SA, David BM, Zhao Y, et al. (2012) Validity of two self-report measures of sitting time. J Phys Act Health 9: 533-539. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.4.533
[64]	Conroy DE, Maher JP, Elavsky S, et al. (2013) Sedentary behavior as a daily process regulated by habits and intentions. Health Psychol 32: 1149-1157. doi: 10.1037/a0031629

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)