Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Stand by Me: Qualitative Insights into the Ease of Use of Adjustable Workstations

Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Curtin University, Australia

Special Issues: Advances in sedentary behavior research and translation

Background: Office workers sit for more than 80% of the work day making them an important target for work site health promotion interventions to break up prolonged sitting time. Adjustable workstations are one strategy used to reduce prolonged sitting time. This study provides both an employees’ and employers’ perspective into the advantages, disadvantages, practicality and convenience of adjustable workstations and how movement in the office can be further supported by organisations. This qualitative study was part of the Uprising pilot study. Employees were from the intervention arm of a two group (intervention n = 18 and control n = 18) study. Employers were the immediate line-manager of the employee. Data were collected via employee focus groups (n = 17) and employer individual interviews (n = 12). The majority of participants were female (n = 18), had healthy weight, and had a post-graduate qualification. All focus group discussions and interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and the data coded according to the content. Qualitative content analysis was conducted. Results: Employee data identified four concepts: enhanced general wellbeing; workability and practicality; disadvantages of the retro-fit; and triggers to stand. Most employees (n = 12) reported enhanced general well-being, workability and practicality included less email exchange and positive interaction (n = 5), while the instability of the keyboard a commonly cited disadvantage. Triggers to stand included time and task based prompts. Employer data concepts included: general health and wellbeing; work engagement; flexibility; employee morale; and injury prevention. Over half of the employers (n = 7) emphasised back care and occupational health considerations as important, as well as increased level of staff engagement and strategies to break up prolonged periods of sitting. Discussion: The focus groups highlight the perceived general health benefits from this short intervention, including opportunity to sit less and interact in the workplace, creating an ‘energised’ work environment. The retro-fit workstation and keyboard platform provided challenges for some participants. Supervisors emphasised injury prevention and employee morale as two important by products of the adjustable workstation. These were not mentioned by employees. They called for champions to advocate for strategies to break up prolonged sitting. Implications: The findings of this novel research from both the employee and employer perspective may support installation of adjustable workstations as one component of a comprehensive approach to improve the long term health of employees.
  Article Metrics


1. Carr LJ, Swift M, Ferrer A, et al. (2016) Cross-sectional examination of long-term access to sit-stand desks in a professional office setting. Am J Prev Med 50: 96-100.    

2. Pronk NP (2015) Design recommendations for active workplaces. Ergon Des 23: 36-40.

3. Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, et al. (2011) Trends over 5 decades in us occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PloS one 6: e19657.    

4. Tudor-Locke C, Schuna JM, Frensham LJ, et al. (2014) Changing the way we work: Elevating energy expenditure with workstation alternatives. Int J Obes 38: 755-765.    

5. Tew G, Posso M, Arundel C, et al. (2015) Systematic review: Height-adjustable workstations to reduce sedentary behaviour in office-based workers. Occ Med 65.

6. Parry S, Straker L (2012) The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk. BMC Public Health 13: 257-257.

7. Puig-Ribera A, Bort-Roig J, González-Suárez AM, et al. (2015) Patterns of impact resulting from a ‘sit less, move more’web-based program in sedentary office employees. PloS one 10: 47-60.

8. Rezende LFMd, Rodrigues Lopes M, Rey-López JP, et al. (2014) Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews. PloS one 9: e105620-e105620.    

9. Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, et al. (2013) Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis. PloS one 8: e80000-e80000.    

10. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, et al. (2009) Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 998-1005.

11. van Uffelen JG, Wong J, Chau JY, et al. (2010) Occupational sitting and health risks: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 39: 379-388.

12. Gilson N, Straker L, Parry S. (2012) Occupational sitting: Practitioner perceptions of health risks, intervention strategies and influences. Health Promot J Aust 23: 208-212.

13. Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, et al. (2012) Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 55: 2895-2905.    

14. Castillo-Retamal M, Hinckson EA (2011) Measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour at work: A review. Work 40: 345-357.

15. Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Cooper PS, et al. (2009) Meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med 37: 330-339.

16. Alkhajah TA, Reeves MM, Eakin EG, et al. (2012) Sit–stand workstations: A pilot intervention to reduce office sitting time. Am J Prev Med 43: 298-303.    

17. Bort-Roig J, Martin M, Puig-Ribera A, et al. (2013) Uptake and factors that influence the use of ‘sit less, move more’occupational intervention strategies in spanish office employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11: 6556-6560.

18. Tobin R, Leavy J, Jancey J. Uprising: An examination of sit-stand workstations, mental health and work ability in sedentary office workers, in Western Australia. Work. In Press.

19. Grunseit A (2013) “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an australian workplace. BMC Public Health 13: 1-10.

20. Neuhaus M, Eakin EG, Straker L, et al. (2014) Reducing occupational sedentary time: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on activity-permissive workstations. Obes Rev 15: 822-838.    

21. Neuhaus M, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, et al. (2014) Workplace sitting and height-adjustable workstations: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 46: 30-40.    

22. Pronk N, Katz A, Lowry M, et al. (2012) Reducing occupational sitting time and improving worker health: The take-a-stand project. Prev Chronic Disease 9: 2745-2756.

23. Miyachi M, Kurita S, Tripette J, et al. (2015) Installation of a stationary high desk in the workplace: Effect of a 6-week intervention on physical activity. BMC Public Health 15: 1-7.

24. Healy GN, Eakin EG, LaMontagne AD, et al. (2013) Reducing sitting time in office workers: Short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention. Prev Med 57: 43-48.    

25. Dutta N, Koepp GA, Stovitz SD, et al. (2014) Using sit-stand workstations to decrease sedentary time in office workers: A randomized crossover trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11: 6653-6665.    

26. Neuhaus M, Eakin E, Straker L, et al. (2014) Reducing occupational sedentary time: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of evidence on activity‐permissive workstations. Obes Rev 15: 822-838.

27. Karakolis T, Callaghan JP (2014) The impact of sit–stand office workstations on worker discomfort and productivity: A review. Appl Ergon 45: 799-806.

28. Torbeyns T, Bailey S, Bos I, et al. (2014) Actie workstations to fight sedentary behaviour. Sports Med 44: 1261-1273.

29. Chau JY, Daley M, Srinivasan A, et al. (2013) Desk-based workers’ perspectives on using sit-stand workstations: A qualitative analysis of the stand@ work study. BMC Public Health 14: 1-10.

30. Gilson N, Burton N, Uffelen J, et al. (2011) Occupational sitting time: Employees’ perceptions of health risks and intervention strategies. Health Promot J Austr 122: 918-922.

31. De Cocker K, Veldeman C, De Bacquer D, et al. (2015) Acceptability and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for influencing sedentary time at work: Focus group interviews in executives and employees. Int J BehavNutr Phys Act 12: 1-11.    

32. Liamputtong P, (2010) Research methods in health: Foundations for evidence-based practice.: Oxford University Press.

33. Ergotron. Stand up desks. 2016. Available from: http://www.ergotron.com/Products/Workstations/StandUpDesks/tabid/803/language/en-AU/Default.aspx.

34. Radas A, Mackey M, Leaver A, et al. (2013) Evaluation of ergonomic and education interventions to reduce occupational sitting in office-based university workers: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 14: 1-6.    

35. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (coreq): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19: 349-357.    

36. Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27: 237-246.    

37. Chau JY, der Ploeg HP, van Uffelen JG, et al. (2010) Are workplace interventions to reduce sitting effective? A systematic review. Prev Med 51: 352-356.

38. Gilson ND, Suppini A, Ryde GC, et al. (2012) Does the use of standing 'hot' desks change sedentary work time in an open plan office? Prev Med 54: 65-67.    

39. Straker L, Abbott RA, Heiden M, et al. (2013) Sit-stand desks in call centres: Associations of use and ergonomics awareness with sedentary behavior. Appl Ergon 44: 517-522.    

40. Kilpatrick M, Sanderson K, Blizzard L, et al. (2013) Cross-sectional associations between sitting at work and psychological distress: Reducing sitting time may benefit mental health. Ment Health Phys Act 6: 103-109.    

41. Gilson ND, Burton NW, van Uffelen JGZ, et al. (2011) Occupational sitting time: Employees' perceptions of health risks and intervention strategies. Health Promot J Austr 22: 38-43.

42. McGann S, Creagh R, Tye M, et al. (2014) Stationary in the office: Emerging themes for active buildings. Archit Sci Rev 57: 260-270.

43. Bellicha A, Kieusseian A, Fontvieille A-M, et al. (2015) Stair-use interventions in worksites and public settings: A systematic review of effectiveness and external validity. Prev Med 70: 3-13.

44. Duncan MJ, Short C, Rashid M, et al. (2015) Identifying correlates of breaks in occupational sitting: A cross sectional study. Build Res Inf 43: 646-658.    

45. Kahn-Marshall JL, Gallant MP (2012) Making healthy behaviors the easy choice for employees: A review of the literature on environmental and policy changes in worksite health promotion. Health Educ Behav 39: 752-776.

Copyright Info: © 2016, Justine Leavy, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved