Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Human basilar artery: morphology & variations

  • Received: 09 July 2020 Accepted: 09 October 2020 Published: 28 October 2020
  • Introduction Basilar artery is an unpaired medium-sized artery formed by the confluence of right and left vertebral arteries at the pontomedullary junction and extends to the pontomesencephalic junction. It forms the spine of posterior cerebral circulation which is constituted by the vertebrobasilar system and its branches. Normal morphology of the basilar artery forms an essential component of cerebral circulation. The present study aims to measure the level of formation & termination, length, diameter, and angle of formation of the basilar artery. The data presented are relevant to understanding human variations and would be a good anatomical reference for clinicians, anatomists, and medical students. Caliber, length, and angle of bifurcation of the basilar artery help in assessing the feasibility and approach for various surgical procedures and predict cerebro-vascular diseases.
    Materials & methods 96 adult human brain specimens were studied. (78 male, 18 female) (Age range: 19–80 y; Average age: 47.66 y). Measurements were taken using Vernier calliper. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software version 17.
    Results The basilar artery was formed by the confluence of two vertebral arteries in all specimens extending from the pontomedullary junction to the pontomesencephalic junction in 2/3rd of the cases. The left vertebral artery was found to be dominant in 62.5% specimens. The basilar artery showed an average length of 3.1 cm (demonstrating positive correlation with age), average diameter of 3.6–3.9 mm at different levels, and average angle of formation as 65.38° in males and 62.22° in females. Fetal type posterior cerebral artery was noticed in 9.4% cases. 3.1% and 6.3% cases were seen on the right and left sides respectively. Basilar artery fenestration was noted in 2 percent specimens.
    Conclusion Basilar artery morphology was studied in 96 human adult cadavers. Basilar artery formation and termination was normal in more than 2/3rd cases. Variations were noted in its origin, vessel hypoplasia, presence of fenestrations, and fetal patterns. The data obtained from this study are relevant for anatomists, medical students, interventional radiologists, and neurosurgeons.

    Citation: Asha Usha Vijayakumar, Manju Sudhakaran, Leelabhai Janaki Yovel. Human basilar artery: morphology & variations[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(4): 278-292. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020017

    Related Papers:

    [1] Kaovinath Appalasamy, R Mamat, Sudhakar Kumarasamy . Smart thermal management of photovoltaic systems: Innovative strategies. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(2): 309-353. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025013
    [2] Hind I. El-Refaey, Saleh. M. Shalaby, Swellam W. Sharshir, Hewida Omara, Tamer A. Gado . Experimental investigation of the effect of TDS on the thermal performance of the different types of solar stills. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(2): 428-448. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025016
    [3] Wisam A. Abd Al-wahid, Hussein Awad Kurdi Saad, Zahraa Hamzah Hasan, Kamaruzzaman Sopian . Experimental study of the performance of hemispherical solar still with optimum value of rocks as heat transfer enhancers. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 885-899. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022040
    [4] Tan Nguyen Tien, Quang Khong Vu, Vinh Nguyen Duy . Novel designs of thermoelectric generator for automotive waste heat recovery: A review. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 922-942. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022042
    [5] Wei An, Yifan Zhang, Bo Pang, Jun Wu . Synergistic design of an integrated pv/distillation solar system based on nanofluid spectral splitting technique. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(3): 534-557. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021026
    [6] D.M. Reddy Prasad, R. Senthilkumar, Govindarajan Lakshmanarao, Saravanakumar Krishnan, B.S. Naveen Prasad . A critical review on thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar applications. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(4): 507-526. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.4.507
    [7] Abdulrahman Almutlaq . Indoor experiments of a horizontal multiple effects diffusion solar still: Influence of heat input and the number of stages. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(2): 532-547. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024025
    [8] Hayder S. Al-Madhhachi, Ahmed M. Ajeena, Nihad A. Al-Bughaebi . Dynamic simulation and energy analysis of forced circulation solar thermal system in two various climate cities in Iraq. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(1): 138-149. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021008
    [9] Laveet Kumar, Jahanzaib Soomro, Hafeez Khoharo, Mamdouh El Haj Assad . A comprehensive review of solar thermal desalination technologies for freshwater production. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(2): 293-318. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023016
    [10] Chao-Jen Li, Peiwen Li, Kai Wang, Edgar Emir Molina . Survey of Properties of Key Single and Mixture Halide Salts for Potential Application as High Temperature Heat Transfer Fluids for Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Systems. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(2): 133-157. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.2.133
  • Introduction Basilar artery is an unpaired medium-sized artery formed by the confluence of right and left vertebral arteries at the pontomedullary junction and extends to the pontomesencephalic junction. It forms the spine of posterior cerebral circulation which is constituted by the vertebrobasilar system and its branches. Normal morphology of the basilar artery forms an essential component of cerebral circulation. The present study aims to measure the level of formation & termination, length, diameter, and angle of formation of the basilar artery. The data presented are relevant to understanding human variations and would be a good anatomical reference for clinicians, anatomists, and medical students. Caliber, length, and angle of bifurcation of the basilar artery help in assessing the feasibility and approach for various surgical procedures and predict cerebro-vascular diseases.
    Materials & methods 96 adult human brain specimens were studied. (78 male, 18 female) (Age range: 19–80 y; Average age: 47.66 y). Measurements were taken using Vernier calliper. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS software version 17.
    Results The basilar artery was formed by the confluence of two vertebral arteries in all specimens extending from the pontomedullary junction to the pontomesencephalic junction in 2/3rd of the cases. The left vertebral artery was found to be dominant in 62.5% specimens. The basilar artery showed an average length of 3.1 cm (demonstrating positive correlation with age), average diameter of 3.6–3.9 mm at different levels, and average angle of formation as 65.38° in males and 62.22° in females. Fetal type posterior cerebral artery was noticed in 9.4% cases. 3.1% and 6.3% cases were seen on the right and left sides respectively. Basilar artery fenestration was noted in 2 percent specimens.
    Conclusion Basilar artery morphology was studied in 96 human adult cadavers. Basilar artery formation and termination was normal in more than 2/3rd cases. Variations were noted in its origin, vessel hypoplasia, presence of fenestrations, and fetal patterns. The data obtained from this study are relevant for anatomists, medical students, interventional radiologists, and neurosurgeons.


    Regarding the existence of monotonic solutions of differential equations, important results were obtained by Chu [1], Aslanov [2], Ertem and Zafer [3], Yin [4], Li and Fan [5], Rovder [6], Tóthová and Palumbíny [7], Rovderová [8], Iseki [9], Demidovich [10], Sanhan et al. [11], Branga and Olaru [12].

    The purpose of this article is to study the existence and uniqueness of monotonic and positive solutions for systems of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations on the positive real axis (defined over an unbounded interval). To achieve this goal we will base our research on the theory of gauge spaces introduced by Dugundji [13], which proved that any separating family of pseudometrics on a nonempty set induces a Hausdorff uniform structure on that set and conversely, any Hausdorff uniform structure on a nonempty set is generated by a separating family of pseudometrics, this allowing us to identify the gauge spaces with Hausdorff uniform spaces. We costruct three families of pseudometrics and the related gauge spaces, showing that the problem of solving systems of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations on the positive real axis can be reduced to finding the fixed points of an operator which acts on these gauge spaces. Further, using the fixed point results obtained by Colojoara [14] and Gheorghiu [15] in the case of complete gauge spaces, respectively by Knill [16] and Tarafdar [17] for Hausdorff uniform spaces, we proved that under certain conditions the considered operator has a unique fixed point and consequently the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations, with initial condition, has a unique solution on the positive real axis and this solution is monotonic and positive. Also, we explored some sufficient conditions for fulfilling the hypotheses of the main results obtained in the paper. Moreover, an example was given to illustrate the theoretical results.

    In the following, we denote by R+ the real interval [0,).

    We consider a system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations:

    x(t)=f(t,x(t)), tR+, (2.1)

    where x:R+Rn, x=(xi)i=¯1,n, f:R+×RnRn, f=(fi)i=¯1,n.

    Definition 2.1. [18] Let us consider IR+ an interval. We say that the vector functions x,y:R+Rn, x=(xi)i=¯1,n, y=(yi)i=¯1,n, satisfies the condition x(t)y(t) on I, if xi(t)yi(t), i=¯1,n, on I.

    Definition 2.2. [18] A solution function x:R+Rn, x=(xi)i=¯1,n, of the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), is called monotonic for t, if there is a number T0 such that each function xi, i=¯1,n, is monotonic on [T,).

    Theorem 2.1. [18] Let us consider a,bR, a<b, and g:[a,b]R an integrable function on [a,b]. We define the function G:[a,b]R, G(t)=tag(s)ds. Then, the following statements are valid:

    (i) G is continuous on [a,b];

    (ii) If g is continuous on [a,b], then G is differentiable on [a,b] and G(t)=g(t) for all t[a,b].

    Definition 2.3. [13] Let X be a nonempty set. A pseudometric (or gauge) on X is a mapping p:X×XR+ which fulfills the following conditions:

    1) if xX, then p(x,x)=0;

    2) if x,yX, then p(x,y)=p(y,x);

    3) if x,y,zX, then p(x,z)p(x,y)+p(y,z).

    Definition 2.4. [13] Let X be a nonempty set. We say that:

    (i) A gauge structure on X is a family P=(pk)kI of pseudometrics on X;

    (ii) A separating gauge structure P=(pk)kI on X is a gauge structure on X which satisfies the condition: for every pair of elements x,yX, with xy, there exists kI such that pk(x,y)0;

    (iii) A gauge space is a pair (X,P) of a set X and a separating gauge structure P on X.

    Definition 2.5. [13] Let (X,P) be a gauge space, where P=(pk)kI. We say that:

    (i) A sequence (xn)nNX converges to an element xX if for every ε>0 and kI there exists a number n(ε,k)N such that for all nn(ε,k) we have pk(xn,x)<ε;

    (ii) A sequence (xn)nNX is called a Cauchy sequence if for every ε>0 and kI there exists a number n(ε,k)N such that for all nn(ε,k) and pN we have pk(xn,xn+p)<ε;

    (iii) A gauge space (X,P) is named sequentially complete if it satisfies the condition: any Cauchy sequence of elements in X is convergent in X.

    Theorem 2.2. [14,15] If (X,P) is a sequentially complete gauge space, where P=(pk)kI, T:XX is a self-mapping and for every kI there exists αk(0,1) such that

    pk(T(x),T(y))αkpk(x,y),  for all x,yX,  for all kI,

    then T has a unique fixed point on X.

    Definition 2.6. [19] Let X be a nonempty set and (Y,ρ) a metric space. We say that:

    (i) A sequence of functions fn:XY, nN, is called uniformly convergent on X if: there exists a function f:XY with the property that for every ε>0 there is a number n(ε)N such that for all nn(ε) we have ρ(fn(x),f(x))<ε for all xX;

    (ii) A sequence of functions fn:XY, nN, is named a uniformly Cauchy sequence if: for every ε>0 there is a number n(ε)N such that for all nn(ε) and pN we have ρ(fn(x),fn+p(x))<ε for all xX.

    Theorem 2.3. [19] Let X be a nonempty set and (Y,ρ) a metric space. Then the following affirmations are valid:

    (i) If fn:XY, nN, is a uniformly convergent sequence on X to a function f:XY, then fn, nN, is a uniformly Cauchy sequence;

    (ii) If fn:XY, nN, is a uniformly Cauchy sequence and (Y,ρ) is complete, then fn, nN, is a uniformly convergent sequence on X to a function f:XY.

    Theorem 2.4. [19] Let (X,τ) be a topological space, (Y,ρ) a complete metric space and fn:XY, nN, a uniformly convergent sequence on X to a function f:XY. If every function fn, nN, is continuous on X, then f is continuous on X.

    Theorem 2.5. [19] Let (X,d) be a metric space, A a compact subset of X and f:AR a continuous function. Then f is bounded on A and there exists t_,¯tA such that f(t_)=inftAf(t) and f(¯t)=suptAf(t) (f attains its infimum and supremum in A).

    In the following we consider the spaces Rn={x=(x1,...,xn) | xiR, i=¯1,n} and C(R+,Rn)={x:R+Rn | x is continuous on R+}.

    Lemma 3.1. The following properties are valid:

    (i) (Rn,2) is a complete normed linear space, where 2:RnR+, x2=(ni=1x2i)1/2;

    (ii) (Rn,ρ2) is a complete metric space, where ρ2:Rn×RnR+, ρ2(x,y)=xy2;

    (iii) the maps pk,2:C(R+,Rn)×C(R+,Rn)R+, pk,2(x,y)=supt[0,k](x(t)y(t)2eτt), kN, are pseudometrics on C(R+,Rn), where τ>0;

    (iv) (C(R+,Rn),P2) is a sequentially complete gauge space, where P2=(pk,2)kN.

    Proof. The demonstration for statements (i), (ii) can be found, for example, in the paper [19].

    (iii) We choose kN be an arbitrary number.

    Let x,yC(R+,Rn) be arbitrary elements. It follows that the function xy:R+Rn is continuous on R+. Also, it is well known that the norm 2:RnR+ is a continuous map on Rn. Therefore, α:R+R+, α(t)=x(t)y(t)2 is a continuous function on R+. Further, β:R+R+, β(t)=eτt is a continuous function on R+. Consequently, γ:R+R+, γ(t)=α(t)β(t)=x(t)y(t)2eτt is a continuous function on R+. We obtain that the function γ is continuous on [0,k]. Using Theorem 2.5 we deduce that the function γ is bounded on [0,k] and there exists ¯t[0,k] such that γ(¯t)=supt[0,k]γ(t)=supt[0,k](x(t)y(t)2eτt)R+ (γ attains its supremum in [0,k]). Hence, the map pk,2 is well-defined.

    Let us show that the function pk,2 satisfies the conditions of a pseudometric. We choose x,y,zC(R+,Rn) be arbitrary elements. Applying the properties of the norm 2 we get:

    1)pk,2(x,x)=supt[0,k](x(t)x(t)2eτt)=supt[0,k](02eτt)=0;
    2)pk,2(x,y)=supt[0,k](x(t)y(t)2eτt)=supt[0,k](y(t)x(t)2eτt)=pk,2(y,x);
    3)x(t)z(t)2=x(t)y(t)+y(t)z(t)2x(t)y(t)2+y(t)z(t)2,

    hence

    x(t)z(t)2eτtx(t)y(t)2eτt+y(t)z(t)2eτt
    supt[0,k](x(t)y(t)2eτt)+supt[0,k](y(t)z(t)2eτt)
    =pk,2(x,y)+pk,2(y,z), for all t[0,k],

    thus

    supt[0,k](x(t)z(t)2eτt)pk,2(x,y)+pk,2(y,z),

    so

    pk,2(x,z)pk,2(x,y)+pk,2(y,z).

    (iv) According to (iii) P2=(pk,2)kN is a family of pseudometrics on C(R+,Rn), hence it forms a gauge structure on C(R+,Rn). Moreover, for every pair of elements x,yC(R+,Rn), with xy, and every kN, we get pk,2(x,y)=supt[0,k](x(t)y(t)2eτt)0, thus P2=(pk,2)kN is a separating gauge structure on C(R+,Rn). It follows that (C(R+,Rn),P2) is a gauge space.

    Let ε>0 and kN be arbitrary elements.

    We prove that the gauge space (C(R+,Rn),P2) is sequentially complete. We choose (xm)mNC(R+,Rn) an arbitrary Cauchy sequence. Using Definition 2.5 (ii) we deduce that for εeτk>0 and kN there exists a number m(ε,k)N such that for all mm(ε,k) and pN we have pk,2(xm,xm+p)<εeτk, so supt[0,k](xm(t)xm+p(t)2eτt)<εeτk. Because eτkeτt for all t[0,k], we find xm(t)xm+p(t)2eτkxm(t)xm+p(t)2eτt for all t[0,k], thus supt[0,k](xm(t)xm+p(t)2eτk)supt[0,k](xm(t)xm+p(t)2eτt). It follows that for all mm(ε,k) and pN we have: supt[0,k](xm(t)xm+p(t)2)eτk<εeτk, hence supt[0,k](xm(t)xm+p(t)2)<ε, thus xm(t)xm+p(t)2<ε for all t[0,k], so ρ2(xm(t),xm+p(t))<ε for all t[0,k]. Therefore, for every ε>0 there is a number m(ε):=m(ε,k)N such that for all mm(ε) and pN we have ρ2(xm(t),xm+p(t))<ε for all t[0,k], which means that xm:[0,k]Rn, mN, is a uniformly Cauchy sequence (according to Definition 6 (ii)). Moreover, (Rn,ρ2) being a complete metric space (according to the affirmation (ii)), applying Theorem 2.3 (ii) it follows that xm, mN, is a uniformly convergent sequence on [0,k] to a function x:[0,k]Rn. As every function xm, mN, is continuous on [0,k], using Theorem 2.4 we obtain that x is continuous on [0,k]. Hence, xm:[0,k]Rn, mN, is a sequence of continuous functions, which is uniformly convergent on [0,k] to a continuous function x:[0,k]Rn, property that is valid for any value kN. Consequently, the sequence of continuous functions xm:R+Rn, mN, is uniformly convergent on R+ to a continuous function x:R+Rn.

    On the other hand, xm:[0,k]Rn, mN, being a uniformly convergent sequence on [0,k] to a function x:[0,k]Rn, using Definition 6 (i) we deduce that for ε2>0 there is a number m(ε,k)N such that for all mm(ε,k) we have ρ2(xm(t),x(t))<ε2 for all t[0,k], which is equivalent to xm(t)x(t)2<ε2 for all t[0,k]. It follows that for all mm(ε,k) we have: xm(t)x(t)2eτt<ε2eτtε2 for all t[0,k], hence supt[0,k](xm(t)x(t)2eτt)ε2<ε, thus pk,2(xm,x)<ε. Therefore, for every ε>0 and kN there exists a number m(ε,k)N such that for all mm(ε,k) we have pk,2(xm,x)<ε, which means that the sequence (xm)mNC(R+,Rn) converges to an element xC(R+,Rn) (according to Definition 2.5 (i)).

    Consequently, any Cauchy sequence of elements in C(R+,Rn) is convergent in C(R+,Rn), which means that the gauge space (C(R+,Rn),P2) is sequentially complete (according to Definition 2.5 (iii)).

    Theorem 3.1. Let us suppose that the function f:R+×RnRn is continuous on R+×Rn and there is a number L2(f)>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)2L2(f)uv2, for all tR+, u,vRn. Then, the following statements are true:

    (i) The system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn);

    (ii) Moreover, if f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, this solution is monotonic for t;

    (iii) Further, if x00 and f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, the solution is positive.

    Proof. (i) Since the functions x:R+Rn, f:R+×RnRn are continuous, it follows that the function g:R+Rn, g(s)=f(s,x(s)) is continuous. Applying Theorem 2.1 we deduce that the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, is equivalent to the system of integral equations

    x(t)=x0+t0f(s,x(s))ds, tR+. (3.1)

    Using the continuity of the function g, relation (3.1) and Theorem 2.1, we can define an operator T:C(R+,Rn)C(R+,Rn),

    T(x)(t)=x0+t0f(s,x(s))ds, tR+. (3.2)

    For every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), t[0,k], i=¯1,n, we have successively:

    |pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t))|
    =|x0i+t0fi(s,x(s))dsx0it0fi(s,y(s))ds|
    =|t0fi(s,x(s))dst0fi(s,y(s))ds|=|t0(fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s)))ds|
    t0|fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|ds.

    On the other hand, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), s,t[0,k], i=¯1,n, considering the hypothesis f(t,u)f(t,v)2L2(f)uv2, for all tR+, u,vRn, we find:

    |fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|=((fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s)))2)1/2
    (ni=1(fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s)))2)1/2=f(s,x(s))f(s,y(s))2
    L2(f)x(s)y(s)2=L2(f)x(s)y(s)2eτseτs
    L2(f)sups[0,k](x(s)y(s)2eτs)eτs=L2(f)pk,2(x,y)eτs,

    which involves

    t0|fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|dst0L2(f)pk,2(x,y)eτsds
    =L2(f)pk,2(x,y)t0eτsds=L2(f)pk,2(x,y)eτsτ|t0=L2(f)pk,2(x,y)(eτtτ1τ)
    =L2(f)τpk,2(x,y)(eτt1)L2(f)τpk,2(x,y)eτt.

    Hence, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), t[0,k], i=¯1,n, we get

    |pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t))|L2(f)τpk,2(x,y)eτt,

    which implies that

    (pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t)))2(L2(f)τpk,2(x,y)eτt)2,

    thus

    ni=1(pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t)))2ni=1(L2(f)τpk,2(x,y)eτt)2=n(L2(f)τpk,2(x,y)eτt)2,

    so

    (ni=1(pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t)))2)1/2nL2(f)τpk,2(x,y)eτt,

    i.e.,

    T(x)(t)T(y)(t)2nL2(f)τpk,2(x,y)eτt,

    which is equivalent to

    T(x)(t)T(y)(t)2eτtnL2(f)τpk,2(x,y).

    Therefore, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), we obtain

    supt[0,k]T(x)(t)T(y)(t)2eτtnL2(f)τpk,2(x,y),

    thus

    pk,2(T(x),T(y))nL2(f)τpk,2(x,y).

    Consequently, for τ>nL2(f) and denoting αk,2:=nL2(f)τ(0,1), we have

    pk,2(T(x),T(y))αk,2pk,2(x,y),  for all x,yC(R+,Rn),  for all kN.

    According to Lemma 3.1, (C(R+,Rn),P2) is a sequentially complete gauge space, where P2=(pk,2)kN, and above we proved that T:C(R+,Rn)C(R+,Rn) is an operator having the property: for every kN there exists αk,2(0,1) such that

    pk,2(T(x),T(y))αk,2pk,2(x,y),  for all x,yC(R+,Rn),  for all kN.

    Applying Theorem 2.2 it follows that T has a unique fixed point on C(R+,Rn). Therefore, the system of integral equations (3.1) has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn). Consequently, the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn).

    (ii) Let us denote by xC(R+,Rn) the unique solution for the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn. It follows that x is the unique solution in C(R+,Rn) for the system of integral equations (3.1), therefore

    x(t)=x0+t0f(s,x(s))ds, tR+. (3.3)

    Let t1<t2 be arbitrary numbers in R+. According to relation (3.3) and considering the hypothesis f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, we deduce

    x(t1)x(t2)=x0+t10f(s,x(s))dsx0t20f(s,x(s))ds
    =t10f(s,x(s))dst20f(s,x(s))ds=t2t1f(s,x(s))ds0,

    hence x(t1)x(t2). It follows that x is a monotonically increasing function on R+. Consequently, each function xi, i=¯1,n, is monotonic on [0,), i.e., x is monotonic for t.

    (iii) In accordance with the relation (3.3) and considering the hypotheses x00 and f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, we find x(t)0, for all tR+, therefore the solution x is positive.

    Lemma 3.2. The following properties are valid:

    (i) (Rn,1) is a complete normed linear space, where 1:RnR+, x1=ni=1|xi|;

    (ii) (Rn,ρ1) is a complete metric space, where ρ1:Rn×RnR+, ρ1(x,y)=xy1;

    (iii) the maps pk,1:C(R+,Rn)×C(R+,Rn)R+, pk,1(x,y)=supt[0,k]x(t)y(t)1eτt, kN, are pseudometrics on C(R+,Rn), where τ>0;

    (iv) (C(R+,Rn),P1) is a sequentially complete gauge space, where P1=(pk,1)kN.

    Proof. The demonstration for statements (i), (ii) can be found, for example, in the paper [19]. To prove affirmations (iii) and (iv) we can proceed similarly to the demonstration of Lemma 3.1.

    Theorem 3.2. Let us suppose that the function f:R+×RnRn is continuous on R+×Rn and there is a number L1(f)>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)1L1(f)uv1, for all tR+, u,vRn. Then, the following statements are true:

    (i) The system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn);

    (ii) Moreover, if f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, this solution is monotonic for t;

    (iii) Further, if x00 and f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, the solution is positive.

    Proof. (i) Since the functions x:R+Rn, f:R+×RnRn are continuous, it follows that the function g:R+Rn, g(s)=f(s,x(s)) is continuous. Applying Theorem 2.1 we deduce that the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, is equivalent to the system of integral equations

    x(t)=x0+t0f(s,x(s))ds, tR+. (3.4)

    Using the continuity of the function g, relation (3.4) and Theorem 2.1, we can define an operator T:C(R+,Rn)C(R+,Rn),

    T(x)(t)=x0+t0f(s,x(s))ds, tR+. (3.5)

    For every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), t[0,k], i=¯1,n, we have successively:

    |pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t))|
    =|x0i+t0fi(s,x(s))dsx0it0fi(s,y(s))ds|
    =|t0fi(s,x(s))dst0fi(s,y(s))ds|=|t0(fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s)))ds|
    t0|fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|ds,

    which implies that

    ni=1|pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t))|
    ni=1t0|fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|ds=t0ni=1|fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|ds,

    i.e.,

    T(x)(t)T(y)(t)1t0f(s,x(s))f(s,y(s))1ds.

    On the other hand, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), s,t[0,k], considering the hypothesis f(t,u)f(t,v)1L1(f)uv1, for all tR+, u,vRn, we find:

    f(s,x(s))f(s,y(s))1L1(f)x(s)y(s)1
    =L1(f)x(s)y(s)1eτseτsL1(f)sups[0,k](x(s)y(s)1eτs)eτs
    =L1(f)pk,1(x,y)eτs,

    which involves

    t0f(s,x(s))f(s,y(s))1dst0L1(f)pk,1(x,y)eτsds
    =L1(f)pk,1(x,y)t0eτsds=L1(f)pk,1(x,y)eτsτ|t0=L1(f)pk,1(x,y)(eτtτ1τ)
    =L1(f)τpk,1(x,y)(eτt1)L1(f)τpk,1(x,y)eτt.

    Hence, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), t[0,k], we get

    T(x)(t)T(y)(t)1L1(f)τpk,1(x,y)eτt,

    which is equivalent to

    T(x)(t)T(y)(t)1eτtL1(f)τpk,1(x,y).

    Therefore, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), we obtain

    supt[0,k]T(x)(t)T(y)(t)1eτtL1(f)τpk,1(x,y),

    thus

    pk,1(T(x),T(y))L1(f)τpk,1(x,y).

    Consequently, for τ>L1(f) and denoting αk,1:=L1(f)τ(0,1), we have

    pk,1(T(x),T(y))αk,1pk,1(x,y),  for all x,yC(R+,Rn),  for all kN.

    According to Lemma 3.2, (C(R+,Rn),P1) is a sequentially complete gauge space, where P1=(pk,1)kN, and above we proved that T:C(R+,Rn)C(R+,Rn) is an operator having the property: for every kN there exists αk,1(0,1) such that

    pk,1(T(x),T(y))αk,1pk,1(x,y),  for all x,yC(R+,Rn),  for all kN.

    Applying Theorem 2.2 it follows that T has a unique fixed point on C(R+,Rn). Therefore, the system of integral equations (3.4) has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn). Consequently, the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn).

    (ii), (iii) The proof is similar to Theorem 3.1.

    Lemma 3.3. The following properties are valid:

    (i) (Rn,) is a complete normed linear space, where :RnR+, x=maxi=¯1,n|xi|;

    (ii) (Rn,ρ) is a complete metric space, where ρ:Rn×RnR+, ρ(x,y)=xy;

    (iii) the maps pk,:C(R+,Rn)×C(R+,Rn)R+, pk,(x,y)=supt[0,k]x(t)y(t)eτt, kN, are pseudometrics on C(R+,Rn), where τ>0;

    (iv) (C(R+,Rn),P) is a sequentially complete gauge space, where P=(pk,)kN.

    Proof. The demonstration for statements (i), (ii) can be found, for example, in the paper [19]. To prove affirmations (iii) and (iv) we can proceed similarly to the demonstration of Lemma 3.1.

    Theorem 3.3. Let us suppose that the function f:R+×RnRn is continuous on R+×Rn and there is a number L(f)>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)L(f)uv, for all tR+, u,vRn. Then, the following statements are true:

    (i) The system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn);

    (ii) Moreover, if f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, this solution is monotonic for t;

    (iii) Further, if x00 and f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, the solution is positive.

    Proof. (i) Since the functions x:R+Rn, f:R+×RnRn are continuous, it follows that the function g:R+Rn, g(s)=f(s,x(s)) is continuous. Applying Theorem 2.1 we deduce that the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, is equivalent to the system of integral equations

    x(t)=x0+t0f(s,x(s))ds, tR+. (3.6)

    Using the continuity of the function g, relation (3.6) and Theorem 2.1, we can define an operator T:C(R+,Rn)C(R+,Rn),

    T(x)(t)=x0+t0f(s,x(s))ds, tR+. (3.7)

    For every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), t[0,k], i=¯1,n, we have successively:

    |pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t))|
    =|x0i+t0fi(s,x(s))dsx0it0fi(s,y(s))ds|
    =|t0fi(s,x(s))dst0fi(s,y(s))ds|=|t0(fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s)))ds|
    t0|fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|ds.

    On the other hand, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), s,t[0,k], i=¯1,n, considering the hypothesis f(t,u)f(t,v)L(f)uv, for all tR+, u,vRn, we find:

    |fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|maxi=¯1,n|fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|
    =f(s,x(s))f(s,y(s))L(f)x(s)y(s)
    =L(f)x(s)y(s)eτseτsL(f)sups[0,k](x(s)y(s)eτs)eτs
    =L(f)pk,(x,y)eτs,

    which involves

    t0|fi(s,x(s))fi(s,y(s))|dst0L(f)pk,(x,y)eτsds
    =L(f)pk,(x,y)t0eτsds=L(f)pk,(x,y)eτsτ|t0=L(f)pk,(x,y)(eτtτ1τ)
    =L(f)τpk,(x,y)(eτt1)L(f)τpk,(x,y)eτt.

    Hence, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), t[0,k], i=¯1,n, we get

    |pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t))|L(f)τpk,(x,y)eτt,

    which implies that

    maxi=¯1,n|pri(T(x)(t))pri(T(y)(t))|L(f)τpk,(x,y)eτt,

    thus

    T(x)(t)T(y)(t)L(f)τpk,(x,y)eτt,

    which is equivalent to

    T(x)(t)T(y)(t)eτtL(f)τpk,(x,y).

    Therefore, for every kN, x,yC(R+,Rn), we obtain

    supt[0,k]T(x)(t)T(y)(t)eτtL(f)τpk,(x,y),

    thus

    pk,(T(x),T(y))L(f)τpk,(x,y).

    Consequently, for τ>L(f) and denoting αk,:=L(f)τ(0,1), we have

    pk,(T(x),T(y))αk,pk,(x,y),  for all x,yC(R+,Rn),  for all kN.

    According to Lemma 3.3, (C(R+,Rn),P) is a sequentially complete gauge space, where P=(pk,)kN, and above we proved that T:C(R+,Rn)C(R+,Rn) is an operator having the property: for every kN there exists αk,(0,1) such that

    pk,(T(x),T(y))αk,pk,(x,y),  for all x,yC(R+,Rn),  for all kN.

    Applying Theorem 2.2 it follows that T has a unique fixed point on C(R+,Rn). Therefore, the system of integral equations (3.6) has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn). Consequently, the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn).

    (ii), (iii) The proof is similar to Theorem 3.1.

    In the following, we will investigate some sufficient conditions for fulfilling the hypotheses of Theorem 3.1, Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.3. To achieve this goal we need the mean value theorem in several variables, which is presented below.

    Lemma 3.4. ([18]) Let ARn be an open convex set, g:AR a differentiable function on A and u,v points in A. Then there exists a number θ(0,1) such that

    g(u)g(v)=nj=1gxj((1θ)u+θv)(ujvj)=g((1θ)u+θv)(uv),

    where denoted the gradient and the dot product.

    Theorem 3.4. Let us suppose that the function f:R+×RnRn is continuous on R+×Rn, the function f(t,):RnRn is differentiable on Rn for any tR+ and there exist the numbers Li,j0, i,j=¯1,n, not all equal to zero, such that |fixj(t,x)|Li,j for all tR+, xRn, i,j=¯1,n. Then the following affirmations are valid:

    (i) |fi(t,u)fi(t,v)|nj=1Li,j|ujvj|, for all tR+, u,vRn, i=¯1,n;

    (ii) There is a number L2(f):=(ni=1nj=1L2i,j)1/2>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)2L2(f)uv2, for all tR+, u,vRn;

    (iii) There is a number L1(f):=maxj=¯1,n(ni=1Li,j)>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)1L1(f)uv1, for all tR+, u,vRn;

    (iv) There is a number L(f):=maxi=¯1,n(nj=1Li,j)>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)L(f)uv, for all tR+, u,vRn;

    (v) The system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (2.1), with initial condition x(0)=x0Rn, has a unique solution on C(R+,Rn);

    (vi) Moreover, if f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, this solution is monotonic for t;

    (vii) Further, if x00 and f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uRn, the solution is positive.

    Proof. (i) Obviously A:=Rn is an open convex set. Let tR+, i{1,,n} be arbitrary numbers. We define the function g:RnR, g(x)=fi(t,x). As the function f(t,):RnRn is differentiable on Rn, it follows that the function fi(t,):RnR is differentiable on Rn, hence the function g is differentiable on Rn. Moreover, gxj(x)=fixj(t,x), for all xRn, j=¯1,n. We choose u,vRn be arbitrary points. Applying Lemma 3.4 we deduce that there exists a number θi(0,1) such that

    g(u)g(v)=nj=1gxj((1θi)u+θiv)(ujvj),

    thus

    fi(t,u)fi(t,v)=nj=1fixj(t,(1θi)u+θiv)(ujvj),

    so

    |fi(t,u)fi(t,v)|=|nj=1fixj(t,(1θi)u+θiv)(ujvj)|
    nj=1|fixj(t,(1θi)u+θiv)||ujvj|nj=1Li,j|ujvj|.

    As the elements tR+, u,vRn, i=¯1,n were chosen arbitrarily, from the previous relation it follows that |fi(t,u)fi(t,v)|nj=1Li,j|ujvj|, for all tR+, u,vRn, i=¯1,n.

    (ii) Using the statement (i) and the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, for every tR+, u,vRn, i=¯1,n we deduce

    (fi(t,u)fi(t,v))2(nj=1Li,j|ujvj|)2nj=1L2i,jnj=1(ujvj)2,

    hence

    ni=1(fi(t,u)fi(t,v))2ni=1(nj=1L2i,jnj=1(ujvj)2)
    =ni=1(nj=1L2i,j)nj=1(ujvj)2=ni=1nj=1L2i,jnj=1(ujvj)2,

    thus

    (ni=1(fi(t,u)fi(t,v))2)1/2(ni=1nj=1L2i,j)1/2(nj=1(ujvj)2)1/2,

    so

    f(t,u)f(t,v)2L2(f)uv2.

    (iii) Using the statement (i), for every tR+, u,vRn we find

    ni=1|fi(t,u)fi(t,v)|ni=1(nj=1Li,j|ujvj|)
    =nj=1(ni=1Li,j|ujvj|)=nj=1(ni=1Li,j)|ujvj|
    nj=1maxj=¯1,n(ni=1Li,j)|ujvj|=maxj=¯1,n(ni=1Li,j)nj=1|ujvj|,

    hence

    f(t,u)f(t,v)1L1(f)uv1.

    (iv) Using the statement (i), for every tR+, u,vRn, i=¯1,n we deduce

    |fi(t,u)fi(t,v)|nj=1Li,j|ujvj|
    nj=1Li,jmaxj=¯1,n|ujvj|=(nj=1Li,j)maxj=¯1,n|ujvj|,

    hence

    maxi=¯1,n|fi(t,u)fi(t,v)|maxi=¯1,n(nj=1Li,j)maxj=¯1,n|ujvj|,

    thus

    f(t,u)f(t,v)L(f)uv.

    (v), (vi), (vii) Considering the statements (ii), (iii), (iv) it follows that the hypotheses of Theorem 3.1–3.3 are respectively fulfilled, hence the affirmations (v), (vi), (vii) are valid as a consequence of one of these theorems.

    Example 3.1. Let us consider the following nonlinear system of ordinary differential equations

    {x1(t)=α1(t)sin2x1(t)+β1(t)ln(1+x22(t))+γ1(t)x2(t)=12α2(t)cos4x1(t)+β2(t)11+x22(t)+γ2(t), (3.8)

    where the functions αi,βi,γi:R+R, i=¯1,n, are continuous, positive and bounded on R+. We denote suptR+αi(t)=αiR+, suptR+βi(t)=βiR+, suptR+γi(t)=γiR+, i=¯1,2, and we suppose that at least one of the values αi, βi, i=¯1,2, is non-zero. According to the relation (2.1) we can rewrite the nonlinear system of ordinary differential equations (3.8) in the form

    x(t)=f(t,x(t)), tR+, (3.9)

    where x:R+R2, x=(xi)i=¯1,2, f:R+×R2R2, f=(fi)i=¯1,2,

    {f1(t,x1,x2)=α1(t)sin2x1+β1(t)ln(1+x22)+γ1(t)f2(t,x1,x2)=12α2(t)cos4x1+β2(t)11+x22+γ2(t). (3.10)

    We remark that the function f:R+×R2R2 is continuous on R+×R2, the function f(t,):R2R2 is differentiable on R2 for any tR+. Also, for every tR+, xR2, we have

    f1x1(t,x1,x2)=α1(t)2sinx1cosx1=α1(t)sin(2x1),f1x2(t,x1,x2)=β1(t)2x21+x22,f2x1(t,x1,x2)=12α2(t)4cos3x1(sinx1)=α2(t)cos2x1sin(2x1),f2x2(t,x1,x2)=β2(t)(1)(1+x22)22x2=β2(t)2x2(1+x22)2,

    hence

    |f1x1(t,x1,x2)|=|α1(t)sin(2x1)|=α1(t)|sin(2x1)|α1(t)α1,|f1x2(t,x1,x2)|=|β1(t)2x21+x22|=β1(t)2|x2|1+|x2|2β1(t)1+|x2|21+|x2|2=β1(t)β1,|f2x1(t,x1,x2)|=|α2(t)cos2x1sin(2x1)|=α2(t)cos2x1|sin(2x1)|α2(t)α2,|f2x2(t,x1,x2)|=|β2(t)2x2(1+x22)2|=β2(t)2|x2|(1+|x2|2)2β2(t)(1+|x2|2)(1+|x2|2)2=β2(t)11+|x2|2β2(t)β2,

    thus there exist the numbers Li,j0, i,j=¯1,2, not all equal to zero, such that

    |fixj(t,x)|Li,j for all tR+, xR2, i,j=¯1,2,

    where L1,1=α1, L1,2=β1, L2,1=α2, L2,2=β2. It follows that the hypotheses of Theorem 3.4 are fulfilled, therefore the following affirmations are valid:

    (i) |fi(t,u)fi(t,v)|αi|u1v1|+βi|u2v2|, for all tR+, u,vR2, i=¯1,2;

    (ii) There is a number L2(f):=(α21+β21+α22+β22)1/2>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)2L2(f)uv2, for all tR+, u,vR2;

    (iii) There is a number L1(f):=max{α1+α2,β1+β2}>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)1L1(f)uv1, for all tR+, u,vR2;

    (iv) There is a number L(f):=max{α1+β1,α2+β2}>0 such that f(t,u)f(t,v)L(f)uv, for all tR+, u,vR2;

    (v) The system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations (3.8), with initial condition x(0)=x0=(δ1δ2)R2, has a unique solution on C(R+,R2);

    (vi) This solution is monotonic for t (as f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uR2);

    (vii) If δi0, i=¯1,2, the solution is positive (since x00 and f(t,u)0, for all tR+, uR2).

    In this article we study the existence and uniqueness of monotonic and positive solutions for systems of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations on the positive real axis (defined over an unbounded interval). For this approach we costruct three families of pseudometrics and the related gauge spaces and we showed that the problem of solving systems of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations on the positive real axis can be reduced to finding the fixed points of an operator which acts on these gauge spaces. Applying the theory of fixed points for complete gauge spaces, we proved that under certain conditions the considered operator has a unique fixed point and consequently the system of first order nonlinear ordinary differential equations, with initial condition, has a unique solution on the positive real axis and this solution is monotonic and positive. Also, we investigated some sufficient conditions for fulfilling the hypotheses of the main results obtained in the paper. In the last part of the article, an application of the theoretical results to the study of a class of systems of nonlinear ordinary differential equations was presented.

    In a more general context and in connection with the context of this article, it is noteworthy the paper of de Cabral-García et al. [20], in which the authors provide sufficient conditions to ensure when a self-mapping of a non-empty set has a unique fixed point. Precisely, the authors consider a set of measurable functions that is closed, convex, and uniformly integrable. Thus, the proof of the existence result depends on a certain type of sequential compactness for uniformly integrable functions, that is also studied. Moreover, the fixed point theorem is applied in the study of the existence and uniqueness of solutions for some Fredholm and Caputo equations. Since the fractional calculus is an actual topic of interest, this will be a further direction of research to extend the results obtained in the present study.

    Furthermore, this paper focuses on first order differential equations, and we know that the theory of first order differential equations is also relevant to approach high order differential equations, via comparative techniques. The fixed point theory play a key role in the development of iteration methods for numerical approximation of solutions. In this sense, it is worth mentioning the paper of Akgun and Rasulov [21], which opens a window on this topic, by proposing a new iterative method for third-order boundary value problems based on embedding Green's function. The results of the mentioned paper extend and generalize the corresponding results in the literature. Moreover, the existence and uniqueness theorems are established, and necessary conditions are derived for convergence. Considering this paper as the basis of research, another direction of extension of the present study could be its application to the construction of new fixed point iterative methods of approximation of solutions for high order differential equations.

    Finally, we would like to mention a recently published survey of Debnath et al. [22], which contains a systematic knowledge and the current state-of-the-art development of the fixed point theory and its applications in several areas. This book could serve to discover new directions to extend the results established in the present paper.

    The author thanks the anonymous referees and the editors for their valuable comments and suggestions which improved greatly the quality of this paper. Project financed by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu & Hasso Plattner Foundation research grants LBUS-IRG-2021-07.

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.


    Acknowledgments



    We thank the entire teaching and nonteaching faculty of Department of Forensic Medicine, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram for their kind support during the period of this study.

    Conflicts of interest



    The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.

    [1] Standring S, Ellis H, Wigley C (2005)  Gray's anatomy: The anatomical basis of clinical practice Edinburgh; New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
    [2] Wankhede HA, Hosmani PB, Nimje DA (2014) Morphological study of the basilar artery in adult human cadavers. Int J Anat Res 2: 497-502.
    [3] Efendic A, Isakovic E, Delic J, et al. (2014) Vascular geometry of vertebrobasilar tree with and without aneurysm. Med Glas (Zenica) 11: 252-257.
    [4] Ravensbergen J, Hillen B, Krijger JK, et al. (1996) The influence of the angle of confluence on the flow in a Vertebrobasilar junction model. J Biomech 29: 281-299. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00064-X
    [5] Tanaka M, Sakaguchi M, Miwa K, et al. (2013) Basilar artery diameter is an independent predictor of incident cardiovascular events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 33: 2240-2244. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301467
    [6] Aoki J, Iguchi Y, Kimura K, et al. (2010) Diameter of the basilar artery may be associated with neurological deterioration in acute pontine infarction. Eur Neurol 63: 221-226. doi: 10.1159/000279619
    [7] Menshawi K, Gutierrez J, Mohr JP (2015) A functional perspective on embryology and anatomy of cerebral blood supply. J Stroke 17: 144-158. doi: 10.5853/jos.2015.17.2.144
    [8] van Raamt AF, van Laar PJ, Mali WP, et al. (2006) The fetal variant of the circle of Willis and its influence on the cerebral collateral circulation. Cerebrovasc Dis 22: 217-224. doi: 10.1159/000094007
    [9] Romanes GJ (1986)  Cunningham's Manual of Practical Anatomy Oxford University Press.
    [10] Padmavathi G, Niranjana Murthy KV, Rajeshwari T (2011) Study of the variations in the origin and termination of basilar artery. Anatomica Karnataka 5: 54-59.
    [11] Yaşargil MG (2009) Microneurosurgery: Principles, applications, and training. Practical Handbook of Neurosurgery Vienna: Springer.
    [12] Fisher CM, Gore I, Okabe N, et al. (1965) Atherosclerosis of the carotid and vertebral arteries—extracranial and intracranial. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 24: 455-476. doi: 10.1097/00005072-196507000-00007
    [13] Hong JM, Chung CS, Bang OY, et al. (2009) Vertebral artery dominance contributes to basilar artery curvature and peri-vertebrobasilar junctional infarcts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80: 1087-1092. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.169805
    [14] Mamatha H, D'souza AS, Suhani S (2012) Human cadaveric study of the morphology of the basilar artery. Singapore Med J 53: 760-763.
    [15] Iqbal S (2013) Vertebro-basilar variants and their basic clinical implications. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2: 799-808.
    [16] Wankhede HA, Hosmani PB, Nimje DA (2014) Morphological study of the basilar artery in adult human cadavers. Int J Anat Res 2: 497-502.
    [17] Pai BS, Varma RG, Kulkarni RN, et al. (2007) Microsurgical anatomy of the posterior circulation. Neurology India 55: 31-41. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.30424
    [18] Glagov S, Zarins C, Giddens DP, et al. (1988) Hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Insights and perspectives gained from studies of human arteries. Arch Pathol Lab Med 112: 1018-1031.
    [19] Lee SH, Hur N, Jeong SK (2012) Geometric analysis and blood flow simulation of basilar artery. J Atheroscler Thromb 19: 397-405. doi: 10.5551/jat.10694
    [20] Passero S, Filosomi G (1998) Posterior circulation infarcts in patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia. Stroke 29: 653-659. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.29.3.653
    [21] Sacks JG, Lindenberg R (1970) Dolicho-ectatic intracranial arteries. Symptomatology and pathogenesis of arterial elongation and distension. Johns Hopkins Med J 125: 95-105.
    [22] Goldstein SJ, Sacks JG, Lee C, et al. (1983) Computed tomographic findings in cerebral artery ectasia. AJNR 4: 501-504.
    [23] Saeki N, Rhoton AL (1977) Anatomy of the posterior circle of Willis. J Neurosurg 46: 564-578. doi: 10.3171/jns.1977.46.5.0563
    [24] Kamath SA (1979) A study of dimensions of the basilar artery in South Indian subjects. J Anat Soc India 28: 45-64.
    [25] Pico F, Labreuche J, Gourfinkel-An I, et al. (2006) Basilar artery diameter and 5-year mortality in patients with stroke. Stroke 37: 2342-2347. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236058.57880.03
    [26] Black SP, Ansbacher LE (1984) Saccular aneurysm associated with segmental duplication of the basilar artery. A morphological study. J Neurosurg 6: 1005-1008. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.6.1005
    [27] Finlay HM, Canham PB (1994) The layered fabric of cerebral artery fenestrations. Stroke 25: 1799-1806. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.25.9.1799
    [28] Stopford JS (1916) The arteries of the pons and medulla oblongata. J Anat Physiol 50: 131-164.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Delfina Gómez, Sergei A. Nazarov, Rafael Orive-Illera, María-Eugenia Pérez-Martínez, Spectral gaps in a double-periodic perforated Neumann waveguide, 2023, 131, 18758576, 385, 10.3233/ASY-221776
    2. D. Gómez, S. A. Nazarov, R. Orive-Illera, M.-E. Pérez-Martínez, Remark on Justification of Asymptotics of Spectra of Cylindrical Waveguides with Periodic Singular Perturbations of Boundary and Coefficients, 2021, 257, 1072-3374, 597, 10.1007/s10958-021-05506-z
    3. Sergei A. Nazarov, Jari Taskinen, Band-gap structure of the spectrum of the water-wave problem in a shallow canal with a periodic family of deep pools, 2023, 36, 1139-1138, 263, 10.1007/s13163-021-00420-z
    4. D. Gómez, S. A. Nazarov, R. Orive-Illera, M. -E. Pérez-Martínez, 2022, Chapter 7, 978-3-031-07170-6, 95, 10.1007/978-3-031-07171-3_7
    5. Delfina Gómez, Sergei A. Nazarov, Rafael Orive‐Illera, María‐Eugenia Pérez‐Martínez, Asymptotic stability of the spectrum of a parametric family of homogenization problems associated with a perforated waveguide, 2023, 0025-584X, 10.1002/mana.202100589
    6. D. Gómez, S. A. Nazarov, M.-E. Pérez-Martínez, Pointwise Fixation along the Edge of a Kirchhoff Plate, 2023, 1072-3374, 10.1007/s10958-023-06862-8
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(9276) PDF downloads(328) Cited by(5)

Figures and Tables

Figures(10)  /  Tables(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog