Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Altruistic aging: The evolutionary dynamics balancing longevity and evolvability

. School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ 85306-4908, USA

Altruism is typically associated with traits or behaviors that benefit the population as a whole, but are costly to the individual. We propose that, when the environment is rapidly changing, senescence (age-related deterioration) can be altruistic. According to numerical simulations of an agent-based model, while long-lived individuals can outcompete their short lived peers, populations composed of long-lived individuals are more likely to go extinct during periods of rapid environmental change. Moreover, as in many situations where other cooperative behavior arises, senescence can be stabilized in a structured population.

  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords Senescence; cooperation; agent-based modeling; evolution; structured populations

Citation: Minette Herrera, Aaron Miller, Joel Nishimura. Altruistic aging: The evolutionary dynamics balancing longevity and evolvability. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(2): 455-465. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017028

References

  • [1] P. A. Abrams, Does increased mortality favor the evolution of more rapid senescence?, Evolution, 47 (1993): 877-887.
  • [2] P. Bak,K. Sneppen, Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution, Physical Review Letters, 71 (1993): 4083.
  • [3] S. Balshine-Earn,F. C. Neat,H. Reid,M. Taborsky, Paying to stay or paying to breed? field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish, Behavioral Ecology, 9 (1998): 432-438.
  • [4] G. Bavestrello,C. Sommer,M. Sarà, Bi-directional conversion in turritopsis nutricula (hydrozoa), Scientia Marina, 56 (1992): 137-140.
  • [5] J. Bendor,P. Swistak, Types of evolutionary stability and the problem of cooperation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92 (1995): 3596-3600.
  • [6] J. D. Congdon,R. D. Nagle,O. M. Kinney,R. C. van Loben Sels,T. Quinter,D. W. Tinkle, Testing hypotheses of aging in long-lived painted turtles (chrysemys picta), Experimental Gerontology, 38 (2003): 765-772.
  • [7] F. Fu,M. A. Nowak, Global migration can lead to stronger spatial selection than local migration, Journal of Statistical Physics, 151 (2013): 637-653.
  • [8] L. Hadany,T. Beker,I. Eshel,M. W. Feldman, Why is stress so deadly? an evolutionary perspective, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273 (2006): 881-885.
  • [9] W. Hamilton, The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Ⅰ, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7 (1964): 1-16.
  • [10] G. Ichinose,M. Saito,H. Sayama,D.S. Wilson, Adaptive long-range migration promotes cooperation under tempting conditions, Scientific Reports, 3 (2013): p2509.
  • [11] K. Jin, Modern biological theories of aging, Aging and Disease, 1 (2010): p72.
  • [12] M. Kimura,G.H. Weiss, The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance, Genetics, 49 (1964): p561.
  • [13] T. B. Kirkwood, Evolution of ageing, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 123 (2002): 737-745.
  • [14] P. Ljubuncic,A. Z. Reznick, The evolutionary theories of aging revisited-a mini-review, Gerontology, 55 (2009): 205-216.
  • [15] P. B. Medawar, An Unsolved Problem of Biology, College, 1952.
  • [16] M. A. Nowak, Five rules for the evolution of cooperation, Science, 314 (2006): 1560-1563.
  • [17] H. Ohtsuki,P. Bordalo,M. A. Nowak, The one-third law of evolutionary dynamics, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249 (2007): 289-295.
  • [18] L. Partridge,N. H. Barton, Optimality, mutation and the evolution of ageing, Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science, 362 (1993): 305-311.
  • [19] G. B. Pollock,A. Cabrales, Suicidal altruism under random assortment, Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10 (2008): 1077-1086.
  • [20] A. Traulsen,M. A. Nowak, Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103 (2006): 10952-10955.
  • [21] J. Van Cleve, Social evolution and genetic interactions in the short and long term, Theoretical Population Biology, 103 (2015): 2-26.
  • [22] J. W. Vaupel, A. Baudisch, M. Dölling, D. A. Roach and J. Gampe, The case for negative senescence, Theoretical Population Biology, 65 (2004), 339-351, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004058090400022X, Demography in the 21st Century.
  • [23] A. Weismann, E. B. Poulton, S. Schönland and A. E. Shipley, Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems, vol. 1, Clarendon press, 1891.
  • [24] G. C. Williams, Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence, Evolution, 11 (1957): 398-411.

 

This article has been cited by

  • 1. Changbai Xi, Yao Chi, Tianlu Qian, Wenhan Zhang, Jiechen Wang, Simulation of Human Activity Intensity and Its Influence on Mammal Diversity in Sanjiangyuan National Park, China, Sustainability, 2020, 12, 11, 4601, 10.3390/su12114601

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2017, Joel Nishimura, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved