Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics

  • Received: 01 May 2014 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 April 2015
  • MSC : Primary: 92C50, 92B05; Secondary: 37N25.

  • The past century's description of oncolytic virotherapy as a cancer treatment involving specially-engineered viruses that exploit immune deficiencies to selectively lyse cancer cells is no longer adequate. Some of the most promising therapeutic candidates are now being engineered to produce immunostimulatory factors, such as cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules, which, in addition to viral oncolysis, initiate a cytotoxic immune attack against the tumor.
       This study addresses the combined effects of viral oncolysis and T-cell-mediated oncolysis. We employ a mathematical model of virotherapy that induces release of cytokine IL-12 and co-stimulatory molecule 4-1BB ligand. We found that the model closely matches previously published data, and while viral oncolysis is fundamental in reducing tumor burden, increased stimulation of cytotoxic T cells leads to a short-term reduction in tumor size, but a faster relapse.
       In addition, we found that combinations of specialist viruses that express either IL-12 or 4-1BBL might initially act more potently against tumors than a generalist virus that simultaneously expresses both, but the advantage is likely not large enough to replace treatment using the generalist virus. Finally, according to our model and its current assumptions, virotherapy appears to be optimizable through targeted design and treatment combinations to substantially improve therapeutic outcomes.

    Citation: Peter S. Kim, Joseph J. Crivelli, Il-Kyu Choi, Chae-Ok Yun, Joanna R. Wares. Quantitative impact of immunomodulation versus oncolysis with cytokine-expressing virus therapeutics[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2015, 12(4): 841-858. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.841

    Related Papers:

  • The past century's description of oncolytic virotherapy as a cancer treatment involving specially-engineered viruses that exploit immune deficiencies to selectively lyse cancer cells is no longer adequate. Some of the most promising therapeutic candidates are now being engineered to produce immunostimulatory factors, such as cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules, which, in addition to viral oncolysis, initiate a cytotoxic immune attack against the tumor.
       This study addresses the combined effects of viral oncolysis and T-cell-mediated oncolysis. We employ a mathematical model of virotherapy that induces release of cytokine IL-12 and co-stimulatory molecule 4-1BB ligand. We found that the model closely matches previously published data, and while viral oncolysis is fundamental in reducing tumor burden, increased stimulation of cytotoxic T cells leads to a short-term reduction in tumor size, but a faster relapse.
       In addition, we found that combinations of specialist viruses that express either IL-12 or 4-1BBL might initially act more potently against tumors than a generalist virus that simultaneously expresses both, but the advantage is likely not large enough to replace treatment using the generalist virus. Finally, according to our model and its current assumptions, virotherapy appears to be optimizable through targeted design and treatment combinations to substantially improve therapeutic outcomes.


    加载中
    [1] J. Theor. Biol., 225 (2003), 257-274.
    [2] PLoS Comput. Biol., 7 (2011), e1001085.
    [3] J. Theor. Biol., 252 (2008), 109-122.
    [4] Mol. Cancer, 12 (2013), p103.
    [5] Bull. Math. Biol., 72 (2010), 469-489.
    [6] Oncoimmunology, 1 (2012), 9-17.
    [7] Immunity, 21 (2004), 341-347.
    [8] Cancer Res., 61 (2001), 5453-5460.
    [9] J. Virol., 75 (2001), 10663-10669.
    [10] Clin. Cancer Res., 13 (2007), 4677-4685.
    [11] Cancer Gene Ther., 16 (2009), 873-882.
    [12] Bull. Math. Biol., 73 (2011), 2-32.
    [13] Expert Rev. Vaccines, 12 (2013), 1155-1172.
    [14] Cancer Res., 66 (2006), 2314-2319.
    [15] J. Virol., 74 (2000), 2895-2899.
    [16] Cell, 144 (2011), 646-674.
    [17] Mol. Ther., 18 (2010), 264-274.
    [18] J. Virol., 80 (2006), 3549-3558.
    [19] Future Oncol., 6 (2010), 941-949.
    [20] J. Theor. Biol., 263 (2010), 530-543.
    [21] PLoS ONE, 5 (2010), e15482.
    [22] Nat. Commun., 4 (2013), p1974.
    [23] Mol. Ther., 18 (2010), 888-895.
    [24] Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci., 17 (2013), 2145-2158.
    [25] Gene Ther., 15 (2008), 247-256.
    [26] J. Theor. Biol., 239 (2006), 334-350.
    [27] Mol. Ther., 19 (2011), 1008-1016.
    [28] Clin. Cancer Res., 15 (2009), 2352-2360.
    [29] Gene Ther., 19 (2012), 543-549.
    [30] Nat. Biotechnol., 30 (2012), 658-670.
    [31] Clin. Cancer Res., 18 (2012), 6679-6689.
    [32] Nat. Immunol., 2 (2001), 423-429.
    [33] Nat. Immunol., 1 (2000), 47-53.
    [34] Mol. Cancer Ther., 5 (2006), 362-366.
    [35] Cancer Res., 61 (2001), 3501-3507.
    [36] Math. Biosci. Eng., 10 (2013), 939-957.
    [37] PLoS ONE, 4 (2009), e4271.
    [38] N. Engl. J. Med., 369 (2013), 122-133.
    [39] Hum. Gene Ther., 8 (1997), 37-44.
    [40] Bull. Math. Biol., 66 (2004), 605-625.
    [41] Neoplasia, 15 (2013), 591-599.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1454) PDF downloads(703) Cited by(22)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog