Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematical models to definitively quantify their relative merits

  • Received: 01 September 2010 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 October 2010
  • MSC : 93C15, 92B05.

  • We ask the question Which antibiotic deployment protocols select best against drug-resistant microbes: mixing or periodic cycling? and demonstrate that the statistical distribution of the performances of both sets of protocols, mixing and periodic cycling, must have overlapping supports. In other words, it is a general, mathematical result that there must be mixing policies that outperform cycling policies and vice versa.
       As a result, we agree with the tenet of Bonhoefer et al. [1] that one should not apply the results of [2] to conclude that an antibiotic cycling policy that implements cycles of drug restriction and prioritisation on an ad-hoc basis can select against drug-resistant microbial pathogens in a clinical setting any better than random drug use. However, nor should we conclude that a random, per-patient drug-assignment protocol is the de facto optimal method for allocating antibiotics to patients in any general sense.

    Citation: Robert E. Beardmore, Rafael Peña-Miller. Antibiotic cycling versus mixing: The difficulty of using mathematicalmodels to definitively quantify their relative merits[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2010, 7(4): 923-933. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.923

    Related Papers:

    [1] Holly Gaff, Robyn Nadolny . Identifying requirements for the invasion of a tick species and tick-borne pathogen through TICKSIM. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 625-635. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.625
    [2] Ardak Kashkynbayev, Daiana Koptleuova . Global dynamics of tick-borne diseases. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 4064-4079. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020225
    [3] Kwadwo Antwi-Fordjour, Folashade B. Agusto, Isabella Kemajou-Brown . Modeling the effects of lethal and non-lethal predation on the dynamics of tick-borne disease. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(6): 1428-1463. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025054
    [4] Yijun Lou, Li Liu, Daozhou Gao . Modeling co-infection of Ixodes tick-borne pathogens. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1301-1316. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017067
    [5] Shangbing Ai . Global stability of equilibria in a tick-borne disease model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2007, 4(4): 567-572. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.567
    [6] Marco Tosato, Xue Zhang, Jianhong Wu . A patchy model for tick population dynamics with patch-specific developmental delays. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 5329-5360. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022250
    [7] Maeve L. McCarthy, Dorothy I. Wallace . Optimal control of a tick population with a view to control of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18916-18938. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023837
    [8] Wandi Ding . Optimal control on hybrid ODE Systems with application to a tick disease model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2007, 4(4): 633-659. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.633
    [9] Yan-Xia Dang, Zhi-Peng Qiu, Xue-Zhi Li, Maia Martcheva . Global dynamics of a vector-host epidemic model with age of infection. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1159-1186. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017060
    [10] Stephen A. Gourley, Xiulan Lai, Junping Shi, Wendi Wang, Yanyu Xiao, Xingfu Zou . Role of white-tailed deer in geographic spread of the black-legged tick Ixodes scapularis : Analysis of a spatially nonlocal model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(4): 1033-1054. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018046
  • We ask the question Which antibiotic deployment protocols select best against drug-resistant microbes: mixing or periodic cycling? and demonstrate that the statistical distribution of the performances of both sets of protocols, mixing and periodic cycling, must have overlapping supports. In other words, it is a general, mathematical result that there must be mixing policies that outperform cycling policies and vice versa.
       As a result, we agree with the tenet of Bonhoefer et al. [1] that one should not apply the results of [2] to conclude that an antibiotic cycling policy that implements cycles of drug restriction and prioritisation on an ad-hoc basis can select against drug-resistant microbial pathogens in a clinical setting any better than random drug use. However, nor should we conclude that a random, per-patient drug-assignment protocol is the de facto optimal method for allocating antibiotics to patients in any general sense.


  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Anne E. Yust, Davida S. Smyth, 2020, Chapter 5, 978-3-030-33644-8, 217, 10.1007/978-3-030-33645-5_5
    2. Identifying requirements for the invasion of a tick species and tick-borne pathogen through TICKSIM, 2013, 10, 1551-0018, 625, 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.625
    3. Shelby M. Scott, Casey E. Middleton, Erin N. Bodine, 2019, 40, 9780444641526, 3, 10.1016/bs.host.2018.10.001
    4. Antoinette Ludwig, Howard S. Ginsberg, Graham J. Hickling, Nicholas H. Ogden, A Dynamic Population Model to Investigate Effects of Climate and Climate-Independent Factors on the Lifecycle ofAmblyomma americanum(Acari: Ixodidae), 2016, 53, 0022-2585, 99, 10.1093/jme/tjv150
    5. Kamuela E. Yong, Anuj Mubayi, Christopher M. Kribs, Agent-based mathematical modeling as a tool for estimating Trypanosoma cruzi vector–host contact rates, 2015, 151, 0001706X, 21, 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.06.025
    6. Milliward Maliyoni, Faraimunashe Chirove, Holly D. Gaff, Keshlan S. Govinder, A stochastic epidemic model for the dynamics of two pathogens in a single tick population, 2019, 127, 00405809, 75, 10.1016/j.tpb.2019.04.004
    7. David Gammack, Elsa Schaefer, Holly Gaff, 2013, 9780124157804, 105, 10.1016/B978-0-12-415780-4.00004-1
    8. R. Nadolny, H. Gaff, Modelling the Effects of Habitat and Hosts on Tick Invasions, 2018, 5, 23737867, 10.30707/LiB5.1Nadolny
    9. Milliward Maliyoni, Faraimunashe Chirove, Holly D. Gaff, Keshlan S. Govinder, A Stochastic Tick-Borne Disease Model: Exploring the Probability of Pathogen Persistence, 2017, 79, 0092-8240, 1999, 10.1007/s11538-017-0317-y
    10. Olivier M. Zannou, Achille S. Ouedraogo, Abel S. Biguezoton, Emmanuel Abatih, Marco Coral-Almeida, Souaïbou Farougou, Kouassi Patrick Yao, Laetitia Lempereur, Claude Saegerman, Models for Studying the Distribution of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases in Animals: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis with a Focus on Africa, 2021, 10, 2076-0817, 893, 10.3390/pathogens10070893
    11. Xue Zhang, Jianhong Wu, A coupled algebraic-delay differential system modeling tick-host interactive behavioural dynamics and multi-stability, 2023, 86, 0303-6812, 10.1007/s00285-023-01879-8
    12. Alexis L. White, Holly D. Gaff, 2021, Chapter 4, 978-3-030-84595-7, 31, 10.1007/978-3-030-84596-4_4
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2010 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3190) PDF downloads(570) Cited by(24)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog