Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Influence of macro-topography on mechanical performance of 0.5 wt% nanoclay/multi-layer graphene-epoxy nanocomposites

Northumbria University, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, United Kingdom

Topical Section: 2D Materials

Influence of topography on the variation in mechanical performance of 0.5 wt% multi-layer graphene (MLG)/nanoclay-epoxy nanocomposites has been studied. Three different systems were produced: 0.5 wt% MLG-EP, 0.5 wt% nanoclay-EP, and 0.25 wt% MLG-0.25 wt% nanoclay-EP. The influence of synergistic effect on mechanical performance in case of hybrid nanocomposites is also studied. Various topography parameters studied include maximum roughness height (Rz or Rmax),root mean square value (Rq),roughness average (Ra), and surface waviness (Wa).The Rz of as-cast 0.5 wt% MLG, nanoclay, and 0.25 wt% MLG-0.25 wt% nanoclay-EP nanocomposites were 41.43 μm, 43.54 μm, and 40.28 μm, respectively. The 1200P abrasive paper and the velvet cloth decreased the Rzvalue of samples compared with as-cast samples. In contrary, the 60P and 320P abrasive papers increased the Rz values. Dueto the removal of material from the samples by erosion, the dimensions of samples decreased. The weight loss due to erosion was commensurate with the coarseness of abrasive papers. It was observed that MLG is more influential in enhancing the mechanical performance of epoxy nanocomposites than nanoclay. In addition, it was observed that mechanical performance of hybrid nanocomposites did not show a marked difference suggesting that synergistic effects are not strong enough in MLG and nanoclay.
  Article Metrics

Keywords topography; mechanical performance; fracture toughness; 0.5 wt% MLG/nanoclayepoxy nanocomposites; dynamic mechanical performance

Citation: Rasheed Atif, Fawad Inam. Influence of macro-topography on mechanical performance of 0.5 wt% nanoclay/multi-layer graphene-epoxy nanocomposites. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(4): 1294-1308. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.4.1294


  • 1. Schuler M, Kunzler TP, De Wild M, et al. (2009) Fabrication of TiO2-coated epoxy replicas with identical dual-type surface topographies used in cell culture assays. J Biomed Mater Res A 88: 12–22.
  • 2. Lam CK, Lau KT (2007) Tribological behavior of nanoclay/epoxy composites. Mater Lett 61: 3863–3866.
  • 3. Yu S, Hu H, Ma J, et al. (2008) Tribological properties of epoxy/rubber nanocomposites. Tribol Int 41: 1205–1211.
  • 4. Xia S, Liu Y, Pei F, et al. (2015) Identical steady tribological performance of graphene-oxide-strengthened polyurethane/epoxy interpenetrating polymer networks derived from graphene nanosheet. Polymer 64: 62–68.
  • 5. Atif R, Inam F (2016) Modeling and simulation of graphene based polymer nanocomposites : Advances in the last decade. Graphene 96–142.
  • 6. Siegel R, Hu E, Roco M (1999) Nanostructure science and technology. A worldwide study.
  • 7. Pan G, Guo Q, Ding J, et al. (2010) Tribological behaviors of graphite/epoxy two-phase composite coatings. Tribol Int 43: 1318–1325.
  • 8. Brostow W, Dutta M, Rusek P (2010) Modified epoxy coatings on mild steel: Tribology and surface energy. Eur Polym J 46: 2181–2189.
  • 9. Zhang WH, Hsieh JH (2000) Tribological behavior of TiN and CrN coatings sliding against an epoxy molding compound. Surf Coatings Technol 130: 240–247.
  • 10. Chang L, Zhang Z, Ye L, et al. (2007) Tribological properties of epoxy nanocomposites: III. Characteristics of transfer films. Wear 262: 699–706.
  • 11. Lackner JM, Waldhauser W, Ganser C, et al. (2014) Mechanisms of topography formation of magnetron-sputtered chromium-based coatings on epoxy polymer composites. Surf Coatings Technol 241: 80–85.
  • 12. Atif R, Wei J, Shyha I, et al. (2016) Use of morphological features of carbonaceous materials for improved mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. RSC Adv 6: 1351–1359.
  • 13. Atif R, Shyha I, Inam F (2016) The degradation of mechanical properties due to stress concentration caused by retained acetone in epoxy nanocomposites. RSC Adv 6: 34188–34197.
  • 14. Atif R, Shyha I, Inam F (2016) Modeling and experimentation of multi-layered nanostructured graphene-epoxy nanocomposites for enhanced thermal and mechanical properties. J Compos Mater 1–12.
  • 15. Sumfleth J, de Almeida Prado LAS, Sriyai M, et al. (2008) Titania-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes epoxy composites: Enhanced dispersion and synergistic effects in multiphase nanocomposites. Polymer 49: 5105–5112.
  • 16. Ma H, Tong L, Xu Z, et al. (2007) Synergistic effect of carbon nanotube and clay for improving the flame retardancy of ABS resin. Nanotechnology 18: 14026–14029.
  • 17. Cotell CM, Sprague JA, Smidth FAJ (1994) ASM Handbook, Vol. 5. Surface Engineering, Published by ASM International, USA.
  • 18. Karger-Kocsis J, Mahmood H, Pegoretti A (2015) Recent advances in fiber/matrix interphase engineering for polymer composites. Prog Mater Sci 73: 1–43.
  • 19. Moon SI, Jang J (1999) Mechanical interlocking and wetting at the interface between argon plasma treated UHMPE fiber and vinylester resin. J Mater Sci 34: 4219–4224.
  • 20. Nardin M, Ward IM (1987) Influence of surface treatment on adhesion of polyethylene fibres. Mater Sci Technol 3: 814–826.
  • 21. Ladizesky NH, Ward IM (1989) The adhesion behaviour of high modulus polyethylene fibres following plasma and chemical treatment. J Mater Sci 24: 3763–3773.
  • 22. Woods DW, Ward IM (1993) Study of the oxygen treatment of high-modulus polyethylene fibres. Surf Interface Anal 20: 385–392.
  • 23. Tissington B, Pollard G, Ward IM (1991) A study of the influence of fibre/resin adhesion on the mechanical behaviour of ultra-high-modulus polyethylene fibre composites. J Mater Sci 26: 82–92.
  • 24. Engelke R, Engelmann G, Gruetzner G, et al. (2004) Complete 3D UV microfabrication technology on strongly sloping topography substrates using epoxy photoresist SU-8. Microelectron Eng 73–74: 456–462.
  • 25. Pitler RK, Langer EL (1995) ASM Handbook, Vol. 16. Machining. Published by ASM International, USA.
  • 26. Blau PJ (2001) ASM Handbook, Vol. 18. Friction, Lubrication, and Wear Technology. Published by ASM International, USA.
  • 27. Warrier A, Godara A, Rochez O, et al. (2010) The effect of adding carbon nanotubes to glass/epoxy composites in the fibre sizing and/or the matrix. Compos Part A—Appl S 41: 532–538.
  • 28. Rasheed A, Khalid FA (2014) Fabrication and properties of CNTs reinforced polymeric matrix nanocomposites for sports applications. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 60: 012009.    


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Mohd Shahneel Saharudin, Jiacheng Wei, Islam Shyha, Fawad Inam, The Degradation of Mechanical Properties in Halloysite Nanoclay-Polyester Nanocomposites Exposed in Seawater Environment, Journal of Nanomaterials, 2016, 2016, 1, 10.1155/2016/2604631
  • 2. Mohd Saharudin, Rasheed Atif, Fawad Inam, Effect of Short-Term Water Exposure on the Mechanical Properties of Halloysite Nanotube-Multi Layer Graphene Reinforced Polyester Nanocomposites, Polymers, 2017, 9, 1, 27, 10.3390/polym9010027

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: © 2016, Fawad Inam, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved