Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Introduction to the Special Issue “Socio-Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Reduction in the territorial ecosystems”

1 Department of Human Sciences, University of Catania, Piazza Dante, 32-95124 Catania, IT
2 Italian National Research Council, Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, Via Cavour 4-6, 87036 Rende, IT
3 School of Sciences and Technologies—Section of Geology, University of Camerino, Via Gentile III da Varano, 62032 Camerino, IT
4 Special Commissioner for post-earthquake reconstruction in Central Italy
5 Department of Biology, Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Calabria, Via Pietro Bucci, 87036 Rende, IT

Special Issues: Socio-Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Reduction in the territorial ecosystems

  Article Metrics


1. Antronico L, Marincioni F (2018) Introduction, In: Antronico L, Marincioni F (eds), Natural Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction Policies, Geographies of the Anthropocene book series, Rende, IT: Il Sileno Edizioni, Available from: http://www.ilsileno.it/geographiesoftheanthropocene.

2. Mela A, Mugnano S, Olori D (2017) Territori Vulnerabili. Verso una Nuova Sociologia dei Disastri Italiana. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale book series; Milan, IT: FrancoAngeli.

3. Forino G, Carnelli F (2017) Di cosa si parla quando si parla di rischio in Italia? Note a margine sul nuovo Rapporto sullo stato del rischio nel territorio italiano 2017. Il Lavoro Culturale, Available from: http://www.lavoroculturale.org/cosa-si-parla-si-parla-rischio-italia/.

4. Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ufficio rischio sismico e vulcanico (2015) Classificazione sismica del territorio calabrese aggiornata al 2015, Available from: http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/resources/cms/documents/A3_class20150416_r.pdf.

5. Geipel R (1980) Aspetti geografici della percezione ambientale. In: Geipel R (eds), Ricerca geografica e percezione dell'ambiente, Milano: Unicopli, 11-20.

6. Alexander DE (1991) Calamità naturali e rischi associati: sviluppo del campo nel mondo anglofono e valutazione del suo potenziale scientifico, In: Botta G (ed), Prodigi, paure, ragione. Eventi naturali oggi, Milan, IT: Guerini e Associati, 107-122.

7. Alexander DE (1991) Applied geomorphology and the impact of natural hazards on the built environment. Nat Hazards 4: 57-80.    

8. White GF (1974) Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global, New York: Oxford University Press.

9. Science Communication Unit, University of the West of England, Bristol (2014) Science for Environment Policy Future Brief: Public risk perception and environmental policy. Report produced for the European Commission DG Environment, Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy.

10. Chowdhury PD, Haque CE (2011) Risk perception and knowledge gap between experts and the public: issues of flood hazards management in Canada. J Environ Res Dev 5: 1017-1022.

11. De Pascale F, Bernardo M, Muto F, et al. (2015) Geoethics and seismic risk perception: the case of the Pollino area, Calabria, southern Italy and comparison with communities of the past, Geological Society, London, Special Publications 419: 87-102.

© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved