Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Assessing compressibility characteristics of silty soils from CPTU: lessons learnt from the Treporti Test Site, Venetian Lagoon (Italy)

Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, DICAM, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy

Special Issues: Characterization and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils used for geotesting

This paper explores the capability of cone penetration testing as an effective tool to estimate the compressibility characteristics of silts, silt mixtures and sand mixtures. The study uses part of the large amount of piezocone (CPTU) data and subsoil deformation measurements assembled over approximately 6 years at the Treporti Test Site (Venice, Italy), within an extensive research project aimed at thoroughly analyzing the stress-strain-time response of the complex assortment of sandy and silty sediments forming the Venetian lagoon subsoil. The combined analysis of piezocone data and subsoil deformations measured beneath a full-scale test embankment primarily showed that the existing interpretation approaches developed for 'standard' sands or clays - and thus based on the idealized assumption of fully drained or fully undrained testing conditions - generally result in invalid estimates of soil compressibility parameters. Therefore, site-specific correlations have been developed in order to correctly predict the compressibility of Venetian sediments, both primary and secondary, and consequently obtain the best fit of the measured settlements. By taking this very well documented case study as a base, the proposed paper aims at discussing some key issues on the use of piezocone tests for the geotechnical characterization of silts and other sedimentary soils with very scattered grain size distributions, thus falling in the so-called intermediate permeability range. The idea is basically to provide a critical appraisal of the CPTU-based approaches currently available for the mechanical characterization of natural soils, and explore potential advances in the interpretation methods, which might take account of possible partial drainage phenomena around the advancing cone during the test.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. Rowe PW (1973) Soil mechanic aspect of the cores of the deep borehole VE 1 in Venice. A critical analysis and recommended future investigations. Venice (Italy): National Research Council.

2. Ricceri G, Butterfield R (1974) An analysis of compressibility data from a deep borehole in Venice. Géotechnique 24: 175–191.    

3. Ricceri G, Simonini P, Cola S (2002) Applicability of piezocone and dilatometer to characterize the soils of the Venice Lagoon.   Geotech Geol Eng 20: 89–121.

4. Jamiolkowski M, Ricceri G, Simonini P (2009) Safeguarding Venice from high tides: site characterization and geotechnical problems. In: Proc. 17th ICSMGE, The Netherlands: IOS Press, 3209–3227.

5. Tonni L, Gottardi G (2011) Analysis and interpretation of piezocone data on the silty soils of the Venetian lagoon (Treporti test site). Can Geotech J 48: 616–633.    

6. Cola S, Simonini P (2002) Mechanical behavior of silty soils of the Venice lagoon as a function of their grading characteristics. Can Geotech J 39: 879–893.    

7. Tonni L, García Martínez MF, Simonini P, et al. (2016) Piezocone-based prediction of secondary compression settlements of coastal defence structures on natural silt mixtures. Ocean Eng 116: 101–116.    

8. Simonini P (2004) Characterization of the Venice lagoon silts from in-situ tests and the performance of a test embankment. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Site Characterization, ISC'2, Rotterdam (The Netherlands): Millpress, 187–207.

9. Gottardi G, Tonni L (2004) Use of piezocone tests to characterize the silty soils of the Venetian lagoon (Treporti Test Site). In: Proc 2nd Int Conf on Site Characterization, ISC'2, Rotterdam (The Netherlands): Millpress, 1643–1650.

10. Marchetti S, Monaco P, Calabrese M, et al. (2004) DMT-predicted vs measured settlements under a full-scale instrumented embankment at Treporti (Venice, Italy). In: Proc 2nd Int Conf on Site Characterization, ISC'2, Rotterdam (The Netherlands): Millpress, 1511–1518.

11. Monaco P, Amoroso S, Marchetti S, et al. (2014) Overconsolidation and stiffness of Venice lagoon sands and silts from SDMT and CPTU. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140: 215–227.    

12. McGillivray A, Mayne PW (2004) Seismic piezocone and seismic flat dilatometer tests at Treporti. In: Proc 2nd Int Conf on Site Characterization, ISC'2, Rotterdam (The Netherlands): Millpress, 1695–1700.

13. Tonni L, Simonini P (2013) Shear wave velocity as function of cone penetration test measurements in sand and silt mixtures. Eng Geol 163: 55–67.    

14. Tonni L, Gottardi G (2009) Partial drainage effects in the interpretation of piezocone tests in Venetian silty soils. In: Proc 17th Int Conf on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Eng. (ICSMGE),The Netherlands: IOS Press, 1004–1007.

15. Tonni L, Gottardi G (2010) Interpretation of piezocone tests in Venetian silty soils and the issue of partial drainage. In: Deep Foundations and Geotechnical In Situ Testing, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication (205 GSP), Reston (VA): ASCE, 367–374.

16. Schnaid F, Lehane BM, Fahey M (2004) Characterisation of unusual geomaterials. In: Proc 2ndInt Conf on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization (ISC-2), Rotterdam: Millpress, 49–73

17. García Martínez MF, Tonni L, Gottardi G (2016) On the interpretation of piezocone tests in natural silt and sand mixtures. In: Proc 1st IMEKO TC-4 International Workshop on Metrology for Geotechnics, Metrogeotechnics 2016, IMEKO-International Measurement Confederation, 63–68.

18. García Martínez MF, Tonni L, Gottardi G, et al. (2016) Influence of penetration rate on CPTU measurements in saturated silty soils. In: Proc 5th Int Conf on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterisation (ISC'5), Sidney: Australian Geomechanics Society, 473–478.

19. Schneider JA, Randolph MF, Mayne PW, et al. (2008) Analysis of factors influencing soil classification using normalized piezocone tip resistance and pore pressure parameters. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134: 1569–1586.    

20. Robertson PK (2009) Interpretation of cone penetration tests-a unified approach. Can Geotech J 46: 1337–1355.    

21. Robertson PK (2016) Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system-an update. Can Geotech J 53: 1910–1927.    

22. Lunne T, Robertson PK, Powell JJM (1997) Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: Blackie Academic & Professional.

23. Dejong JT, Randolph MF (2012) Influence of partial consolidation during cone penetration on estimated soil behaviour type and pore pressure dissipation measurements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138: 777–788.    

24. Teh CI, Houlsby GT (1991) An analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay. Géotechnique 41: 17–34.    

25. Randolph MF (2004) Characterisation of soft sediments for offshore applications. In: Proc 2ndInt Conf on Site Characterization, ISC'2, Rotterdam (The Netherlands): Millpress, 209–232.

26. Leroueil S, Kabbaj M, Tavenas F, et al. (1985) Stress-strain-strain rate relation for the compressibility of sensitive natural clays. Géotechnique 35: 159–180.    

27. Senneset K, Janbu N, Svanø G (1982) Strength and deformation parameters from cone penetration tests. In: Proc 2nd European Symp on Penetration Testing (ESOPT-II), Rotterdam: Balkema, 863–870.

28. Lunne T, Christophersen HP (1983) Interpretation of cone penetrometer data for offshore sands. In: Proc of the Offshore Technology Conference, 4464.

29. Senneset K, Sandven R, Lunne T et al. (1988) Piezocone tests in silty soils. In: Proc 1st Int Symp on Penetration Testing (ISOPT-1), Rotterdam: Balkema, 955–966.

30. Kulhawy FH, Mayne PH (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA.

31. Simonini P, Tonni L (2014) Primary and secondary compression characteristics of silts from CPTU: lessons learnt from the Venetian Lagoon sediments. In: Proc 3rd Int Symp on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT'14), 745–752.

32. Augustesen A, Liingaard M, Lade PV (2004) Evaluation of time-dependent behaviour of soils. Int J of Geomech 4: 137–156.    

33. Leroueil S (2006) The isotache approach.Where are we 50 years after its development by Professor Šuklje? In: Proc XIII Danube-European Conference on Geotechnical Engineering,Ljubiana, Slovenia, 1: 55–88

34. Mesri G, Godlewski PM (1977) Time and stress compressibility interrelationship. J Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 103 (GT5): 417–430.

35. Tonni L, Simonini P (2013) Evaluation of secondary compression of sands and silts from CPTU. Geomech Geoeng 8: 141–154.    

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved