AIMS Geosciences, 2016, 2(2): 99-115. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2016.2.99

Research article

Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

ERT-based Investigation of a Sinkhole in Greene County, Missouri

Department of Geosciences and Geological and Petroleum Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.

Investigating sinkhole morphology and formation mechanisms is key to understanding their long term impact and susceptibility to development, and aids in the design of effective mitigation measures. In this study, ERT (electrical resistivity tomography), MASW (multichannel analysis of surface waves) and borehole data were used to image the subsurface morphology of an active sinkhole in Greene County, Missouri. The study reveals that the sinkhole developed along a natural surface drainage pathway above a pervasively fractured limestone. The subsurface image of the sinkhole depicts a zone of near-vertical water seepage and soil piping. Based on the nature of the overburden material, and the morphology and current/past surface expression of the sinkhole, it is concluded that the sinkhole is predominantly a cover subsidence type of sinkhole. However, it is possible that minor cover collapse occurred locally and in an area slightly to the north of the current active sinkhole.
  Article Metrics


1. Chalikakis K, Plagnes V, Guerin R, et al. (2011). Contribution of geophysical methods to karst-system exploration: an overview, Hydrogeology Journal, 19: 1169–1180.

2. Festa V, Fiore A, Parise M, et al. (2012). Sinkhole evolution in the Apulian karst of southern Italy; a case study, with some considerations on sinkhole hazards. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 74, p. 137-147.

3. Waltham T, Bell F, Culshaw MG (2005). Sinkholes and Subsidence; Karst and cavernous rocks in engineering and construction. Chichester, UK: Praxis, Springer 382pp.

4. Gutiérrez F (2010). Hazards associated with karst. In Geomorphological Hazards and Disaster Prevention, Alcántara-Ayala I, Goudie A (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 161–173.

5. Ahmed I, Neil A (2012). 2-D and 3-D Resistivity Imaging of Karst Sites in Missouri, USA. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, Vol. XVIII, No. 3, August 2012, pp. 281–293.

6. Carbonel D, Rodríguez V, Gutiérrez F, et al. (2014). Evaluation of trenching, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) for sinkhole characterization, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, Vol. 39, 214–227.

7. Kaufmann J (2008). A Statistical Approach to Karst Collapse Hazard Analysis in Missouri. Sinkholes and the Engineering and Environmental Impacts of Karst (2008): pp. 257-268.

8. Galve P, Gutiérrez F, Remondo J, et al. (2009). Evaluating and comparing methods of sinkhole susceptibility mapping in the Ebro Valley evaporite karst (NE Spain), Geomorphology, v. 111, 160-172.

9. Doctor D, Doctor K (2012). Spatial analysis of geologic and hydrologic features relating to sinkhole occurrence in Jefferson County, West Virginia. Carbonates and Evaporites, 27(2): 143–152.

10. Gutiérrez F, Cooper HA, Johnson KS (2008) Identification, prediction and mitigation of sinkhole hazards in evaporate karst areas. Environ Geol 53:1007–1022.    

11. Cook JC (1965) Seismic mapping of underground cavities using reflection amplitudes. Geophysics 30(4):527–538.

12. Bishop I, Styles P, Emsley SJ, et al. (1997). The detection of cavities using the microgravity technique: case histories from mining and karstic environments. Geol Soc Eng Geol Spec Publ 12:153–166.

13. Ballard RF (1983) Cavity detection and delineation research. Report 5, Electromagnetic (radar) techniques applied to cavity detection. Technical Report GL, 83–1, pp 90.

14. Annan AP, Cosway SW, Redman JD (1991) Water table detection with ground-penetrating radar. In: Soc. Explor. Geophys (Annual International Meeting Program with Abstracts), pp 494–497.

15. Labuda TZ, Baxter AC (2001), Mapping karst conditions using 2D and 3D resistivity imaging methods, paper presented at the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Environ. and Eng. Geophys. Soc., Denver, Colorado.

16. Roth MJS, Mackey JR, Mackey C, et al. (2002). A case study of the reliability of multi-electrode earth resistivity testing for geotechnical investigations in karst terrains, Eng. Geol., 65, 225–232.

17. Zhou W, Beck BF, Adams AL (2002). Effective electrode array in mapping karst hazards in electrical resistivity tomography. Environ. Geol. 42:922–928.    

18. Ahmed S, Carpenter PJ (2003). Geophysical response of filled sinkholes, soil pipes and associated bedrock fractures in thinly mantled karst, east-central Illinois. Environmental Geology, 44:705–716.    

19. Lee R, Callahan P, Shelly B, et al. (2010). MASW Survey Identifies Causes of Sink Activity Along I-476 (Blue Route), Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. In: GeoFlorida 2010 Conference; Feb. 20-24.

20. Debeglia N, Bitri A, Thierry P (2006). Karst investigations using microgravity and MASW; application to Orleans, France. Near Surface Geophysics 4: 215–225.

21. Odum JK, Williams RA, Stephenson WJ, et al. (2007). Near-surface shear wave velocity versus depth profiles, Vs 30, and NEHRP classifications for 27 sites in Puerto Rico:USGS Open-File Report 2007-1174.

22. Waltham AC, Fookes PG (2005). Engineering classification of karst ground conditions. Speleogenesis and Evolution of Karst Aquifers, the Virtual Scientific Journal ISSN 1814-294X.

23. Vandike JE (1993) Groundwater level data for Missouri: Water year 1991-1992. Missouri Department of Natural Resources. Division of Geology and Land Survey. Water Resource Report No.42. Rolla, Missouri.

24. Fellow LD (1970). Geology of Galloway Quadrangle Greene County Missouri, Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources, pp 3-14.

25. Hayes WC, Thomson KC (1973). Engineering and environmental geology of the Springfield urban area: Association of Missouri Geologists, 20th annual meeting field trip.

26. Orndorff RC, Weary DJ, Lagueux KM (2000): Geographic information systems analysis of geologic controls on the distribution of dolines in the Ozarks of south-central Missouri, USA. - Acta Carsologica 29/2, 161-175, Ljubljana.

27. McCracken M (1971). Structural features of Missouri: Rolla, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Water Resources, 99 p.

Copyright Info: © 2016, Shishay T. Kidanu, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved