Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Correlation of cyanobacterial harmful bloom monitoring parameters: A case study on western Lake Erie

1 Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019-0308, USA
2 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Fort Pierce, FL 34946, USA
3 Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824-3525, USA

Occurrence of cyanobacterial harmful blooms (CHBs) in water has caused serious concern to environmental and health authorities because of their potential to produce and release lethal biological toxins. Among many toxins, microcystins (MCs) are of particular interest. There have been significant efforts to observe the harmful algal bloom events and cyanotoxin levels, including: (i) manual field sampling followed by lab analysis to directly measure MCs, (ii) remote sensing based on satellite image analysis to estimate cyanobacterial index (CI), and (iii) in-situ sensing of proxy parameters to cyanobacterial blooms such as phycocyanin. This study compared the observation systems in western Lake Erie to find any potential correlations among these CHB monitoring parameters based on the Pearson Product-Moment equation. We found the relationships among the parameters to be site-specific and so we compared geographical, ecological, meteorological, and analytical factors specific to the locations to explain the observed correlations and variations. The CHB observing parameters (MCs, CI, and phycocyanin) were generally well correlated because they inherently represented the same phenomenon. In particular, we found the measured biological toxin concentration (MCs) to be strongly correlated with the cyanobacterial bloom activity (CI) estimated by satellite image analysis. The phycocyanin concentration also had a strong correlation with CI, implying that measuring an easy-to-detect proxy parameter in-situ and in real-time is effective for monitoring CHBs. The results support the notion that key environmental management parameters such as CHB toxicity can be inferred from remotely-sensed ocean color through proxy variables such as CI.
  Article Metrics

Keywords cyanobacterial harmful blooms; harmful algal blooms; Lake Erie; microcystins; cyanobacterial index; phycocyanin; monitoring and observation

Citation: Hesam Zamankhan Malayeri, Mike Twardowski, James Sullivan, Timothy Moore, Hyeok Choi. Correlation of cyanobacterial harmful bloom monitoring parameters: A case study on western Lake Erie. AIMS Environmental Science, 2018, 5(1): 24-34. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2018.1.24


  • 1. Hoagland P, Scatasta S (2006) The Economic Effects of Harmful Algal Blooms, Ecology of Harmful Algae. Ecology Studies Series (E. Graneli and J. Turner, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, Chapter 29.
  • 2. Pan G, Chen J, Anderson DM (2011) Modified Local Sands for the Mitigation of Harmful Algal Blooms. Harmful Algae 10: 381–387.    
  • 3. Anderson CR, Sellner KG, Anderson DM (2017) Bloom Prevention and Control. In: Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and Desalination: A guide to Impacts, Monitoring and Management, Anderson DM, Boerlage SFE, Dixon M (Eds.). Paris, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 2017 (IOC Manuals and Guides No. 78), 205–222.
  • 4. Codd GA, Morrison LF, Metcalf JS (2005) Cyanobacterial Toxins: Risk Management for Health Protection. Toxicol Appl Pharm 203: 264–272.    
  • 5. Carmichael WW (1992) Cyanobacteria secondary metabolites: The cyanotoxins. J Appl Bacteriol 72: 445–459.    
  • 6. Elizabeth W (2014) Toledo Water Danger Unclear, Safety: Algal Contaminants have Varying Toxicities. Chem Eng News 92: 9.
  • 7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Contaminant Candidate List and Regulatory Determination, 2016. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ccl/contaminant-candidate-list-3-ccl-3
  • 8. Seltenrich N (2014) Keeping tables on HABs: New Tools for Detecting, Monitoring, and Preventing Harmful Algal Blooms. Environ Health Persp 122: A206–A213.    
  • 9. Karson B, Anderson CR, Coyne KJ, et al. (2017) Designing an Observing System for Early Detection of Harmful Algal Blooms. In: Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and Desalination: A guide to Impacts, Monitoring and Management, Anderson DM, Boerlage SFE, Dixon M (Eds.). Paris, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 2017 (IOC Manuals and Guides No. 78), 89–117.
  • 10. Zamankhan H, Westrick J, Anscombe F, et al. (2016) Sustainable Monitoring of Algal Blooms. In: Water Sustainability Handbook, Volume I: Management (Ed. Daniel Chen), Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 61–86.
  • 11. Hudnell HK (2010) The State of US Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms Assessments, Policy, and Legislation. Toxicon 55: 1024–1034.
  • 12. Rivasseau C, Racaud P, Deguin A, et al. (1999) Evaluation of an ELISA Kit for the Monitoring of Microcystins (cyanobacterial toxins) in Water and Algae Environmental Samples.Environ. Sci Technol33: 1520–1527.
  • 13. Stumpf RP, Wynne TT, Baker DB, et al. (2012) Interannual Variability of Cyanobacterial Blooms in Lake Erie. PLoS ONE 7: e42444.    
  • 14. Twardowski MS, Lewis M, Barnard A, et al. (2005) In-Water Instrumentation and Platforms for Ocean Color Remote Sensing Applications. Remote Sensing of Coastal Aquatic Waters (R. Miller, C. Del Castillo, and B. McKee. Eds.), Springer Publishing, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 69–100.
  • 15. Marion JW, Lee J, Wilkins JR, et al. (2012) In vivo Phycocyanin Flourometry as a Potential Rapid Screening Tool for Predicting Eevated Microcystin Concentrations at Eutrophic Lakes.Environ Sci Technol46: 4523–4531.
  • 16. Graham JL, Loftin KA, Meyer MT, et al. (2010) Cyanotoxin Mixtures and Taste-and-Odor Compounds in Cyanobacterial Blooms From the Midwestern United States.Environ Sci Technol 44: 7361–7368.
  • 17. Anderson DM (2009) Approaches to Monitoring, Control and Management of Harmful Algal Blooms. Ocean Coast Manage 52: 342–347.    
  • 18. Wynne TT, Stumpf RP, Tomlinson MC, et al. (2010) Characterizing a Cyanobacterial Bloom in Western Lake Erie Using Satellite Imagery and Meteorological Data. Limnol Oceanogr 55: 2025–2036.    
  • 19. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Western Lake Erie Microcystins Sample. Website of the Center of Excellence for Great Lakes and Human Health, 2016. Available from: http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/res/Centers/HABS/western_lake_erie.html.
  • 20. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Harmful Algal Blooms in Lake Erie-Experimental HAB Bulletin Archive. Website of Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 2016. Available from: http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/res/HABs_and_Hypoxia/lakeErieHABArchive.
  • 21. SEA-BIRD COASTAL, Lake Erie LOBO. Website of Land/Ocean Biogeochemical Observatory, 2016. Available from: http://algae.loboviz.com.
  • 22. Harring JR, Wasko JA (2011) Probabilistic Inferences for the Sample Pearson Product Moment Correlation. J Mod Appl Stat Meth 10: 476–493.    
  • 23. Wernet G, Hellweg S, Fischer U, et al. (2008) Molecular Structure-Based Models of Chemical Inventories Using Neural Networks. Environ Sci Technol 42: 6717–6722.    
  • 24. Jianwu S, Miao H, Shaoqing Y, et al. (2007) Microcystin-LR Detection Based on Indirect Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Front Environ Sci Eng China 1: 329–333.    
  • 25. Otten TG, Xu H, Qin B, et al. (2012) Spatiotemporal Patterns and Ecophysiology of Toxigenic Microcystis Blooms in Lake Taihu, China: Implications for Water Quality Management. Environ Sci Technol 46: 3480–3488.
  • 26. Falconer IR, Humpage AR (2006) Cyanobacterial (blue-green algal) Toxins in Water Supplies: Cylindrospermopsins. Environ Toxicol 2: 299–304.


Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved