Research article

Understanding perception and interpretation of Malaysian university students on renewable energy

  • Received: 30 July 2020 Accepted: 11 October 2020 Published: 22 October 2020
  • Contribution of renewable energy (RE) in current Malaysian energy mix is limited despite of the abundant biomass from its agriculture and sufficient sunshine and rainfall throughout the year. As future leaders, the acceptance of young generation towards RE reflects the most important public decision and policy especially in reducing dependency on fossil fuels. In order to optimise the successful of an awareness program, a set of questionnaire has been used to examine the perception and interpretation of university students towards RE. A total of 2,863 completed questionnaire were analysed according to educational background (science and non-science) and family economic status classified as Bottom 40 (B40), Middle 40 (M40) and Top 20 (T20). The results revealed that most of them have positive perception and optimistic on the usage of RE. Unfortunately, more focus and attention should be given to students with non-science educational background and those who came from Bottom 40 economic group in understanding renewable energy. There is also a gap on interpretation that indicates the need for more intellectual activities that covers information on development, technologies and benefit of RE.

    Citation: Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Zul Ilham, Nurul Emy Idayu Zulkifli, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Sarina Abdul Halim-Lim, Hideaki Ohgaki, Keiichi Ishihara, Yutaka Akitsu. Understanding perception and interpretation of Malaysian university students on renewable energy[J]. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(6): 1029-1044. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.6.1029

    Related Papers:

  • Contribution of renewable energy (RE) in current Malaysian energy mix is limited despite of the abundant biomass from its agriculture and sufficient sunshine and rainfall throughout the year. As future leaders, the acceptance of young generation towards RE reflects the most important public decision and policy especially in reducing dependency on fossil fuels. In order to optimise the successful of an awareness program, a set of questionnaire has been used to examine the perception and interpretation of university students towards RE. A total of 2,863 completed questionnaire were analysed according to educational background (science and non-science) and family economic status classified as Bottom 40 (B40), Middle 40 (M40) and Top 20 (T20). The results revealed that most of them have positive perception and optimistic on the usage of RE. Unfortunately, more focus and attention should be given to students with non-science educational background and those who came from Bottom 40 economic group in understanding renewable energy. There is also a gap on interpretation that indicates the need for more intellectual activities that covers information on development, technologies and benefit of RE.


    加载中


    [1] Çelikler D (2013) Awareness about renewable energy of pre-service science teachers in Turkey. Renewable Energy 60: 343-348.
    [2] Muhammad-Sukki F, Abu-Bakar SH, Munir AB, et al. (2014) Progress of feed-in tariff in Malaysia: A year after. Energy Policy 67: 618-625.
    [3] Wong SL, Ngadi N, Andullah TAT, et al. (2015) Recent advances of feed-in-tariff in Malaysia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 41: 42-52.
    [4] Renewable Energy Act 2011 (Act 725). Government of Malaysia.
    [5] Sustainable Energy Development Authority (SEDA) Malaysia (2018) Annual Report 2018. SEDA: Putrajaya.
    [6] Chua SC, Oh TH, Goh WW (2011) Feed-in tariff outlook in Malaysia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 15: 705-712.
    [7] Energy Commission (2019) Malaysia Energy Statistics Handbook 2018. Energy Commission: Malaysia.
    [8] Shahmohammadi MS, Yusuff RM, Keyhanian S, et al. (2015) A decision support system for evaluating effects of Feed-in Tariff mechanism: Dynamic modeling of Malaysia's electricity generation mix. Appl Energy 146: 217-229.
    [9] Hannan MA, Begum RA, Abdolrasol MG, et al. (2018) Review of baseline studies on energy policies and indicators in Malaysia for future sustainable energy development. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 94: 551-564.
    [10] Malaysian Green Technology Corporation (2019) Guidelines for Green Technology Tax Incentive (2nd Version). Selangor, GreenTech Malaysia.
    [11] Sustainable Energy Development Authority (SEDA) Malaysia. 2020. Extension of Green Investment Tax Allowance (GITA) & Green Income Tax Exemption (GITE) until 2023. Available from: http://www.seda.gov.my/reportal/re-incentive/.
    [12] Dharfizi ADH, Ghani ABA, Islam R (2020) Evaluation Malaysia's fuel diversification strategies 1981-2016. Energy Policy 137: 111083.
    [13] Husaini DH, Puah C, Lean HH (2019) Energy subsidy and oil price fluctuation, and price behavior in Malaysia: A time series analysis. Energy 171: 1000-1008.
    [14] Abdul-Hakim R, Ismail R, Abdul-Razak NA (2014) Fuel subsidy rationalisation: The perils on the middle class in Malaysia. Malay J Econ 48: 83-97.
    [15] Economic Planning Unit (2010) Tenth Malaysian Plan 2011-2015. Putrajaya: Prime Minister's Department.
    [16] Solaymani S, Kardooni R, Kari F, et al. (2015) Economic and environmental impacts of energy subsidy reform and oil price shock on the Malaysian transport sector. Travel Behav Soc 2: 65-77.
    [17] Secretary-General of the Treasury (2019) Budget 2020. Putrajaya, Ministry of Finance Malaysia.
    [18] Saari MY, Dietzenbacher E, Los B (2016) The impacts of petroleum price fluctuations on income distribution across ethnic groups in Malaysia. Ecol Econ 130: 25-36.
    [19] Altuntas EC, Turan SL (2018) Awareness of secondary school students about renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy 116: 741-748.
    [20] Hossain M, Huda ASN, Mekhilef S, et al. (2018) A state of-the-art review of hydropower in Malaysia as renewable energy: Current status and future prospects. Energy Strategy Rev 22: 426-437.
    [21] Karatepe Y, Neşe SV, Keçebaş A, et al. (2012) The levels of awareness about the renewable energy sources of university students in Turkey. Renewable Energy 44: 174-179.
    [22] Paço A, Lavrador T (2017) Environmental knowledge and attitudes and behaviours towards energy consumption. J Environ Manage 197: 384-392.
    [23] Vassileva I, Campillo J (2014) Increasing energy efficiency in low-income households through targeting awareness and behavioural change. Renewable Energy 67: 59-63.
    [24] Chua YP (2013) Mastering Research Statistics. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill Education.
    [25] Kaur K (2020) B40, M40 & T20: What do they even mean???. MSN Money. Available from: https://www.msn.com/en-my/money/topstories/b40-m40-and-t20-what-do-they-even-mean/ar-BBYJNbH?li=BBr8Mka.
    [26] Oh TH, Hasanuzzaman Md, Selvaraj J, et al. (2018) Energy policy and alternative energy in Malaysia: Issues and challenges for sustainable growth—An update. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 81: 3021-3031.
    [27] Mekhilef S, Safari A, Mustaffa WES, et al. (2012) Solar energy in Malaysia: Current state and prospects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16: 386-396.
    [28] Chwieduk DA (2017) Towards modern options of energy conservation in buildings. Renewable Energy 101: 1194-1202.
    [29] Sovacool BK, Drupady IM (2011) Examining the Small Renewable energy Power (SREP) Program in Malaysia. Energy Policy 39: 7244-7256.
    [30] Ilham Z, Nimme FH (2019) Quantitative priority estimation model for evaluation of various non-edible plant oils as potential biodiesel feedstock. AIMS Agric Food 4: 303-319.
    [31] Zakaria M, Vijayasekaran Ilham Z, Muhamad NA (2014) Anti-inflammatory acticity of Calophyllum inophylum fruit extracts. Procedia Chem 13: 218-220.
    [32] Malek ABMA, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA, et al. (2017) Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of a 10 MW biomass-based power plant in Malaysia. J Cleaner Prod 141: 502-513.
    [33] Sovacool BS, Bulan LC (2011) Behind an ambitious megaproject in Asia: The history and implications of Bakun hydroelectric dam in Borneo. Energy Policy 39: 4842-4859.
    [34] Polonsky MJ, Vocino A, Grau SL, et al. (2012) The impact of general and carbon related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. J Mark Manage 28: 238-263.
    [35] Hassan MG, Hirst R, Siemieniuch C, et al. (2009) The impact of energy awareness on energy efficiency. Int J Sustainable Eng 2: 284-297.
    [36] Dias RA, Mattos CR, Balestieri JAP (2004) Energy education: Breaking up the rational energy use barriers. Energy Policy 32: 1339-1347.
    [37] Brounen D, Kok N, Quigley JM (2013) Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behaviour of residential households. Energy Econ 38: 42-50.
    [38] DeWaters JE, Powers SE (2011) Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect and behavior. Energy Policy 39: 1699-1710.
    [39] International Energy Agency (IEA) (2020) Available from: https://www.iea.org/.
    [40] Bernama (2019) Drop in number of science, technology, engineering and mathematics students. The Sun Daily. Available from: https://www.thesundaily.my/local/drop-in-number-of-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-students-FK693142.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3959) PDF downloads(212) Cited by(6)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog