Open Access Journals

AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(1): 1-19. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.1.1. Review Special Issues

Export file:

Format

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
BibTex
Text

Content

Citation Only
Citation and Abstract

Sustainability of biohydrogen as fuel: Present scenario and future perspective

Dheeraj Rathore, Anoop Singh, Divakar Dahiya, Poonam Singh Nigam

1 School of Environment and Sustainable Development, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India
2 Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Ministry of Science and Technology, Technology Bhawan, New Delhi, India
3 Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Received: , Accepted: , Published:

Special Issues: Advances in sustainable supply chain and material management

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure/Table Related pages

Depleting fuel resources and global warming potential of fossil fuel raise a concern over its sustainability. Among the four strategically important alternative fuel sources viz. biofuels, hydrogen (H2), natural gas and syngas (synthesis gas), hydrogen emerges as a superior fuel. For the reasons, that hydrogen gas is renewable, free from greenhouse gases emission and liberates large amount of energy per unit weight during combustion, and it also gets converted into electricity by fuel cell easily. The utilization of biohydrogen as an energy source could be able to provide environmental safety as it does not liberate GHGs during combustion. The biohydrogen production could be economical with the latest developments and society will be benefitted with pollution control, which is added into environment during the combustion of other energy sources. The present review discusses various aspects with conclusions that considering social, economic and environmental benefits, biohydrogen energy could be considered as a sustainable source of future clean energy.

Figure/Table

Supplementary

Article Metrics

Keywords: biofuel; hydrogen; sustainability; energy; fermentation

Citation: Dheeraj Rathore, Anoop Singh, Divakar Dahiya, Poonam Singh Nigam. Sustainability of biohydrogen as fuel: Present scenario and future perspective. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(1): 1-19. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.1.1

References:

1. Nigam PS (2017) An Overview of Microorganisms' Contribution and Performance in Alcohol Fermentation Processing a Variety of Substrates. Curr Biotech 6: 9–16.
2. Singh A, Rathore D (2017) Biohydrogen: Next Generation Fuel, In: Singh A, Rathore D (Eds.), Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective, India, Springer, 1–10.
3. Sims REH, Schock RN, Adegbululgbe A, et al. (2007) Energy supply, In: Metz B, Davidson OR (Eds)., Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
4. Singh A, Olsen SI (2012) Key issues in life cycle assessment of biofuels, In: Gopalakrishnan K, et al. (Eds.), Sustainable bioenergy and bioproducts, green energy and technology, London, Springer-Verlag, 213–228.
5. Singh A, Pant D, Korres NE, et al. (2010) Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and perspectives. Bioresource Technol 101: 5003–5012.
6. Singh A, Smyth BM, Murphy JD (2010) A biofuel strategy for Ireland with an emphasis on production of biomethane and minimization of land-take. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14: 277–288.
7. Singh A, Nigam P, Murphy JD (2011) Mechanism and Challenges in commercialisation of algal biofuels. Bioresource Technol 102: 26–34.
8. Singh A, Nigam P, Murphy JD (2011) Renewable fuels from algae: An answer to debatable land based fuels. Bioresource Technol 102: 10–16.
9. Singh A, Olsen SI, Nigam P (2011) A viable technology to generate third generation biofuel. J Chem Technol Biot 86: 1349–1353.
10. Pant D, Singh A, van Bogaert G, et al. (2011) Bioelectrochemical systems (BES) for sustainable energy production and product recovery from organic wastes and industrial wastewaters. RSC Adv 2: 1248–1263.
11. Singh A, Nigam P (2014) Microbial biofuels production, In: Darvishi FH, Hongzhang C (Eds.), Microbial Technology: Progress and Trends, USA,CRS Press Taylor & Francis Group, ISBN 9781482245202, 428–440.
12. Rathore D, Nizami AS, Singh A, et al. (2016) Key issues in estimating energy and greenhouse gas savings of biofuels: Challenges and perspectives. Biofuel Res J 10: 380–393.
13. Nigam P, Singh A (2011) Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog Energ Combust 37: 52–68.
14. ElMekawy A, Sandipam S, Bajracharya S, et al. (2015) Food and agricultural wastes as substrates for bioelectrochemical system (BES): The synchronized recovery of sustainable energy and waste treatment. Food Res Int 73: 213–225.
15. Sinha P, Pandey A (2011) An evaluation report and challenges for fermentative biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 36: 7460–7478.
16. Show KY, Lee DJ, Jhang ZP (2011) Production of biohydrogen: Current perspectives and future prospects, In: Pandey A, Larroche C, et al. (Eds.), Biofuels alternative feedstocks and conversion processes, Amsterdam, Academic Press, 467–479.
17. Show KY, Lee DJ, Chang JS (2011) Bioreactor and process design for biohydrogen production. Bioresource Technol 102: 8524–8533.
18. Rathore D, Singh A (2013) Biohydrogen production from microalgae, In: Gupta VK, Tuohy MG (Eds.), Biofuels technologies recent developments, Berlin, Springer, 317–333.
19. Basak N, Jana AK, Das D, et al. (2014) Photofermentative molecular biohydrogen production by purple-non-sulfur (PNS) bacteria in various modes: The present progress and future perspective. Int J Hydrogen Energ 3: 6853–6871.
20. Miandad R, Rehan M, Ouda OKM, et al. (2017) Waste-to- Hydrogen energy in Saudi Arabia: Challendes and Perspectives, In: Singh A, Rathore D (Eds.), Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective, India, Springer, 237–252.
21. Korres NE, Norsworthy JK (2017) Biohydrogen Production from Agricultural Biomass and Organic Wastes, In: Singh A, Rathore D (Eds.), Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective, Springer, India, 49–68.
22. Gest H, Kamen MD (1949) Photoproduction of molecular hydrogen by Rhodospirillum rubrum. Science 109: 558–559.
23. Hallenbeck PC, Liu Y (2016) Recent advances in hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41: 4446–4454.
24. Liu Y, Hallenbeck PC (2016) A kinetic study of hydrogen production by a Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle mutant, PRK (phosphoribulose kinase), of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41: 11081–11089.
25. Zhang H, Chen G, Zhang Q, et al. (2017) Photosynthetic hydrogen production by alginate immobilized bacterial consortium. Bioresource Technol 236: 44–48.
26. Meng F, Yang A, Wang H, et al. (2018) One-step treatment and resource recovery of high-concentration non-toxic organic wastewater by photosynthetic bacteria. Bioresource Technol 251: 121–127.
27. Hwang JH, Kim HC, Choi JA, et al. (2014) Photoautotrophic hydrogen production by eukaryotic microalgae under aerobic conditions. Nat Commun 5: 3234.
28. Sadler NC, Bernstein HC, Melnicki MR, et al. (2016) Dinitrogenase-driven photobiological hydrogen production combats oxidative stress in Cyanothecesp. strain ATCC 51142. Appl Environ Microbiol 82: 7227–7235.
29. Bayro-Kaiser V, Nelson N (2016) Temperature-sensitive PSII: A novel approach for sustained photosynthetic hydrogen production. Photosynth Res 130: 113–121.
30. Eilenberg H, Weiner I, Ben-Zvi O, et al. (2016) The dual effect of a ferredoxin-hydrogenase fusion protein in vivo: Successful divergence of the photosynthetic electron flux towards hydrogen production and elevated oxygen tolerance. Biotechnol Biofuels 9: 182.
31. Batyrova K, Hallenbeck PC (2017) Hydrogen Production by a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Strain with Inducible Expression of Photosystem II. Int J Mol Sci 18: 647.
32. Krassen H, Schwarze A, Friedrich B, et al. (2009) Photosynthetic Hydrogen Production by a Hybrid Complex of Photosystem I and [NiFe]-Hydrogenase. ACS Nano 3: 4055–4061.
33. Azman NF, Abdeshahian P, Kadier A, et al. (2016) Biohydrogen production from de-oiled rice bran as sustainable feedstock in fermentative process. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41: 145–156.
34. Kumar G, Bakonyi P, Zhen G, et al. (2017) Microbial electrochemical systems for sustainable biohydrogen production: Surveying the experiences from a start-up viewpoint. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70: 589–597.
35. Stanislaus MS, Zhang N, Zhao C, et al. (2017) Ipomoea aquatica as a new substrate for enhanced biohydrogen production by using digested sludge as inoculum. Energy 118: 264–271.
36. Kirili B, Kapdan IK (2016) Selection of microorganism immobilization particle for dark fermentative biohydrogen production by repeated batch operation. Renew Energ 87: 697–702.
37. Sarkar O, Mohan SV (2016) Deciphering acidogenic process towards biohydrogen, biohythane and short chain fatty acids production: Multi-output optimization strategy. Biofuel Res J 11: 458–469.
38. Radha M, Murugesan AG (2017) Enhanced dark fermentative biohydrogen production from marine macroalgae Padina tetrastromatica by different pretreatment process. Biofuel Res J 13: 551–558.
39. Bharathiraja B, Sudharsanaa T, Bharghavi A, et al. (2016) Biohydrogen and biogas-an overview on feedstocks and enhancement process. Fuel 185: 810–828.
40. Sivagurunatahn P, Lin CY (2016) Enhanced biohydrogen production from beverage wastewater: Process performance during various hydraulic retention times and their microbial insights. RSC Adv 6: 4160–4169.
41. Alvarez-Guzmán CL, Oceguera-Contreras E, Ornelas-Salas JT, et al. (2016) Biohydrogen production by the psychrophilic G088 strain using single carbohydrates as substrate. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41: 8092–8100.
42. Wen HQ, Du J, Xing De, et al. (2017) Enhanced photo-fermentative hydrogen production of Rhodopseudomonas sp. nov. strain A7 by biofilm reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energ 42: 18288–18294.
43. Morsy FM (2015) CO₂-free biohydrogen production by mixed dark and photofermentation bacteria from sorghum starch using a modified simple purification and collection system. Energy 87: 594–604.
44. Budiman PM, Wu TY (2016) Ultrasonication pre-treatment of combined effluents from palm oil, pulp and paper mills for improving photofermentative biohydrogen production. Energ Convers Manage 119: 142–150.
45. Sekoai PT (2016) Modelling and Optimization of Operational Setpoint Parameters for Maximum Fermentative Biohydrogen Production Using Box-Behnken Design. Ferment 2: 15.
46. Palomo-Briones R, Razo-Flores E, Bernet N, et al. (2017) Dark-fermentative biohydrogen pathways and microbial networks in continuous stirred tank reactors: Novel insights on their control. Appl Energ 198: 77–87.
47. Goud RK, Arunasri K, Yeruva KDK, et al. (2017) Impact of selectively enriched microbial communities on long-term fermentative biohydrogen production. Bioresource Technol 242: 253–264.
48. Angeriz-Campoy R, Fdez-Güelfo LA, Álvarez-Gallego CJ, et al. (2017) Inhibition of the Hydrolytic Phase in the Production of Biohydrogen by Dark Fermentation of Organic Solid Waste. Energ Fuels 31: 7176–7184.
49. Hay JXW, Wu TY, Juan JC, et al. (2017) Effect of adding brewery wastewater to pulp and paper mill effluent to enhance the photofermentation process: Wastewater characteristics, biohydrogen production, overall performance, and kinetic modeling. Environ Sci Pollut R 24: 10354–10363.
50. Mohan SV (2010) Waste to renewable energy: A sustainable and green approach towards production of biohydrogen by acidogenic fermentation, In: Singh OV, Harvey SP (Eds.), Sustainable biotechnology, Amsterdam, Springer, 129–164.
51. Hallenbeck PC (2009) Fermentative hydrogen production: Principles, progress, and prognosis. Int J Hydrogen Energ 34: 7379–7389.
52. Argun H, Gokfiliz P, Karapinar I (2017) Biohydrogen Production Potential of Different Biomass Sources, In: Singh A, Rathore D (Eds.), Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective, India, Springer, 269–289.
53. Mathews J, Wang G (2009) Metabolic pathway engineering for enhanced biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 34: 7404–7416.
54. Neves LA, Nemestóthy N, Alves VD, et al. (2009) Separation of biohydrogen by supported ionic liquid membranes. Desalination 240: 311–315.
55. Ren J, Manzardo A, Toniolo S, et al. (2013) Sustainability of hydrogen supply chain. Part I: Identification of critical criteria and cause-effect analysis for enhancing the sustainability using DEMATEL. Int J Hydrogen Energ 38: 14159–14171.
56. Asadi N, Alavijeh MK, Zilouei H (2017) Development of a mathematical methodology to investigate biohydrogen production from regional and national agricultural crop residues: A case study of Iran. Int J Hydrogen Energ 42: 1989–2007.
57. Djomo SN, Blumberga D (2011) Comparative life cycle assessment of three biohydrogen pathways. Bioresource Technol 102: 2684–2694.
58. Lee DH (2016) Cost-benefit analysis, LCOE and evaluation of financial feasibility of full commercialization of biohydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41: 4347–4357.
59. Lee DH (2016) Levelized cost of energy and financial evaluation for biobutanol, algal biodiesel and biohydrogen during commercial development. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41: 21583–21599.
60. Lee DH, Chiu LH (2012) Development of a biohydrogen economy in the United States, China, Japan, and India: With discussion of a chicken-and-egg debate. Int J Hydrogen Energ 37: 15736–15745.
61. Han W, Fang J, Liu Z, et al. (2016) Techno-economic evaluation of a combined bioprocess for fermentative hydrogen production from food waste. Bioresource Technol 202: 107–112.
62. Sun Y, Ogden J, Delucchi M (2010) Societal lifetime cost of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energ 35: 11932–11946.
63. Ogden JM, William RH, Larson ED (2004) Societal lifecycle cost comparison of cars with alternative fuels/engines. Energ Policy 32: 7–27.
64. Sekoai PT, Daramola MO (2015) Biohydrogen production as a potential energy fuel in South Africa. Biofuel Res J 6: 223–226.
65. Singh S, Jain S, Venkateswaran PS, et al. (2016) Hydrogen: A sustainable fuel for future of the transport sector. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51: 623–633.
66. Romangoli F, Blumeberga D, Pilicka I (2011) Life cycle assessment of biohydrogen production in photosynthetic processes. Int J Hydrogen Energ 36: 7866–7871.
67. Wulf C, Kaltschmitt M (2013) Hydrogen as a Fuel in the German Transport Sector. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 37: 127–141.
68. Dadak A, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, et al. (2016) Exergy Analysis as a Tool for Decision Making on Substrate Concentration and Light Intensity in Photobiological Hydrogen Production. Energ Technol 4: 429–440.
69. Hossein SS, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, et al. (2015) Thermodynamic evaluation of a photobioreactor for hydrogen production from syngas via a locally isolated Rhodopseudomonas palustris PT. Int J Hydrogen Energ 40: 14246–14256.
70. Wulf C, Thormann L, Kaltschmitt M (2017) Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Biohydrogen Production from Biomass Resources, In: Singh A, Rathore D (Eds.), Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective, India, Springer, 269–289.
71. Boodhun BSF, Mudhoo A, Kumar G, et al. (2017) Research perspectives on constraints, prospects and opportunities in biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 42: 27471–27481.
72. Bretner LB, Peccia J, Zimmerman JB (2010) Challenges in developing biohydrogen as a sustainable energy source: Implications for a research agenda. Environ Sci Technol 44: 2243–2254.
73. FAO (1997) Hydrogen production, In: Renewable biological systems for alternative sustainable energy production, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Miyamoto K (ed.), Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/w7241e/w7241e0g.htm.
74. Arimi MM, Knodel J, Kiprop A, et al. (2015) Strategies for improvement of biohydrogen production from organic-rich wastewater: A review. Biomass Bioenerg 75: 101–118.
75. Kumar G, Bakonyi P, Sivagurunathan P, et al. (2015) Improved microbial conversion of de-oiled Jatropha waste into biohydrogen via inoculum pretreatment and process optimization by experimental design approach. Biofuel Res J 5: 209–214.
76. Kumar G, Zhen G, Sivagurunathan P, et al. (2016) Biogenic H2 production from mixed microalgae biomass: Impact of pH control and methanogenic inhibitor (BESA) addition. Biofuel Res J 11: 470–474.
77. Soydemir G, Keris-Sen UD, Sen U, et al. (2016) Biodiesel production potential of mixed microalgal culture grown in domestic wastewater. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 39: 45–51.
78. Melis A, Happe T (2001) Hydrogen production. Green algae as a source of energy. Plant Physiol 12: 740–748.
79. Show KY, Lee DJ, Tay JH, et al. (2012) Biohydrogen production: Current perspectives and the way forward. Int J Hydrogen Energ 37: 15616–15631.
80. Singh A, Pant D, Olsen SI, et al. (2012) Key Issues to Consider in Microalgae Based Biodiesel Production. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part A 29: 687–700.
81. Oncel SS, Kose A, Faraloni C (2015) Genetic optimization of microalgae for biohydrogen production. Handbook of marine microalgae. Biotechnology advances, Academic Press, 383–404.
82. Susmozas A, Iribarren D, Zapp P, et al. (2016) Life-cycle performance of hydrogen production via indirect biomass gasification with CO₂ capture. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41: 19484–19491.
83. Aslam M, Ahmad R, Yasin M, et al. (2018) Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for biohydrogen production: Recent developments, challenges and perspectives. Bioresource Technol 269: 452–464.
84. Kumar G, Cho SK, Sivagurunathan P, et al. (2018) Insights into evolutionary trends in molecular biology tools in microbial screening for biohydrogen production through dark fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 43: 19885–19901.
85. Kumar G, Shobana S, Nagarajan D, et al. (2018) Biomass based hydrogen production by dark fermentation-recent trends and opportunities for greener processes. Curr Opin Biotech 50: 136–145.
86. Dahiya D, Nigam PS (2018) Bioethanol synthesis for fuel or beverages from the processing of agri-food by-products and natural biomass using economical and purposely modified biocatalytic systems: A Review. AIMS Energy 6(6): 979–992.

show all references

Reader Comments

your name: * your email: *

Download full text in PDF

Associated material

Metrics