AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 810-831. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.810.

Research article

Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Economic and regulatory feasibility of solar PV in the Austrian multi-apartment housing sector

1 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria
2 Energy Institute at the Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Austria
3 International Institute for Real Estate, Construction and Housing, Vienna, Austria

Austria established energy policy targets to decarbonize the housing sector with an increasing usage of low carbon electricity. Solar photovoltaic (PV) is one of the technologies being used to reach this target. Currently, the deployment of PV in the multi-apartment building sector is supported by subsidies. Taking into account the available potential and the policy goals for large-scale PV deployment in the residential sector in Austria, this paper investigates the economic feasibility of PV generation in multi-apartment buildings in the absence of subsidies. It also looks at the necessary regulatory conditions for implementation of economically feasible business models for PV generation in multi-apartment buildings. The empirical data for current research came from case studies of three actual projects, which were implemented by stakeholders with practical experience and knowledge in residential PV.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords photovoltaic; levelized costs of electricity; decentralized energy generation; building sector; business models

Citation: Nadejda Komendantova, Markus Manuel Schwarz, Wolfgang Amann. Economic and regulatory feasibility of solar PV in the Austrian multi-apartment housing sector. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 810-831. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.810

References

  • 1. IPCC (2014) Climate Change Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in: Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri, L.A. Meyer (Eds.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151.
  • 2. Riahi K (2012) In Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future, Chapter 17: Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development, 1205–1305 (Cambridge Univ. Press and IIASA, 2012) Available from: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/Flagship-Projects/Global-Energy-Assessment/GEA_Chapter17_pathways_lowres.pdf.
  • 3. IEA (2013) World Energy Outlook 2013. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
  • 4. UNEP (2009) Buildings and Climate Change–Summary for Decision-Makers. UNEP DTIE, Sustainable Consumption & Production Branch, 15 Rue de Milan, 75441 Paris CEDEX 09, France.
  • 5. European Parliament and Council (2015) Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings (recast)-19 May 2010.
  • 6. Lang T, Ammann D, Girod B (2016) Profitability in absence of subsidies: A techno-economic analysis of rooftop photovoltaic self-consumption in residential and commercial buildings. Renew Energ 87: 77–87.    
  • 7. European Commission, COM (2016) 860 Final. Accelerating clean energy in buildings. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank. Clean Energy for All Europeans.
  • 8. Girod B, van Vuuren EG, Hertwich EG (2013) Global climate targets and future consumption level: an evaluation of the required GHG intensity. Environ Res Lett 8: 1–10.
  • 9. EurObservER (2015) Available from: https://www.eurobserv-er.org.
  • 10. European Commission, COM (2011) 885 Final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions–Energy Roadmap 2050, European Commission, Brussels, 2011.
  • 11. European Commission, COM (2014) 15 Final. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2050, European Commission, Brussels, 2014.
  • 12. Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy, Energy Strategy, Austria (Energiestrategie Oesterreich) (2010) Available from: https://www.bmdw.gv.at/Ministerium/Staatspreise/ Documents/energiestrategie_oesterreich.pdf.
  • 13. Simoes S, Zeyringer M, Mayr D, et al. (2017) Impact of different levels of geographical disaggregation of wind and PV electricity generation in large energy system models: A case study for Austria. Renew Energ 105: 183–198.    
  • 14. Lavagno E, Auer H (2009) REALISEDGRID–ReseArch, Methodologies and Technologies for the Effective Development of pan-European Key GRID Infrastructures to Support the Achievement of a Reliable, Competitive and Sustainable Electricity Supply. D 2.1 the Model Adopted for the Scenar, Torino.
  • 15. Baumann M, Lang B (2013) Entwicklung energiewirtschaftlicher Inputdaten und Szenarien fuer das Klimaschutzgesetz und zur Erfuellung der oesterreichishcen Berichtspflichten des EU Monitoring Mechanismus. Austrian Energy Agency.
  • 16. Fechner H, Lungmaier A, Suna D, et al. (2007) Technologie–Roadmap fuer Photovoltaik in Oesterreich (Berichte aus Energie–und Umweltforschung No.28).
  • 17. Laser Data (2009) Solarpotenzialanalyse: Bestehende Verfahren und Innovation. Available from: http://www.laserdata.at/.
  • 18. Peters M, Schmidt TS, Wiederkehr D, et al. (2011) Shedding light on solar technologies-A techno-economic assessment and its policy implications. Energ Policy 39: 6422–6439.    
  • 19. REN21 (2013) Renewables 2013. Global Status Report. REN21 Secretariat, Paris. Available from: http://www.ren21.net/ren21activities/globalstatusreport.aspx.
  • 20. UNEP/BNEF (2012) Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2012. Frankfurt School-UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate & Sustainable Energy Finance, Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), Frankfurt.
  • 21. Bazilian M, Onyeji I, Liebreich M, et al. (2013) Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power. Renew Energ 53: 329–338.    
  • 22. Breyer C, Gerlach A (2013) Global overview on grid-parity. Prog Photovoltaics: Res Appl 21: 121-136.    
  • 23. IEA (2012) Renewable energy medium-term market report 2012 market trends and projections to 2017. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
  • 24. Lang T, Gloerfeld E, Girod B (2015) Don't just follow the sun–A global assessment of economic performance for residential building photovoltaics. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42: 932–951.    
  • 25. Ondraczek J, Komendantova N, Patt A (2015) WACC the Dog: The effect of financing costs on the levelized cost of solar PV power. Renew Energ 75: 888–898.    
  • 26. Schinko T, Komendantova N, Kalogirou SA, et al. (2016) De-risking investment into concentrated solar power in North Africa: Impacts on the costs of electricity generation. Renew Energ 92: 262–292.    
  • 27. Glassmire J, Komor P, Lilienthal P (2012) Electricity demand savings from distributed photovoltaics. Energ Policy 51: 323–331.    
  • 28. Orioli A, Di Gangi A (2014) Review of the energy and economic parameters involved in the effectiveness of grid-connected PV systems installed in multi-storey buildings. Appl Energ 113: 955–969.    
  • 29. Notton G, Lazarov V, Stoyanov L (2010) Optimal sizing of a grid-connected PV system for various PV module technologies and inclinations, inverter efficiency characteristics and locations. Renew Energ 35: 541–554.    
  • 30. Hartner M, Mayr D, Kollmann A, et al. (2017) Optimal sizing of residential PV-systems from a household and social cost perspective. Sol Energ 141: 49–58.    
  • 31. Biermayr P, Eberl M, Ehrig R, et al. (2017) Innovative energietechnologien in Oesterreich Marktentwicklung. Ber. Energie–Umweltforschung.
  • 32. Wieser R, Mundt A (2014) Housing subsidies and taxation in six EU countries–Trends, structures and recent measures in the light of the global financial crisis. In: Journal of European Real Estate Research (reviewed).
  • 33. Mayr D, Schmidt J, Schmid E (2014) The potentials of a reverse auction in allocating subsidies for cost-effective roof-top photovoltaic system deployment. Energ Policy 69: 555–565.    
  • 34. Lesser JA, Su X (2008) Design of an economically efficient feed-in tariff structure for renewable energy development. Energ Policy 36: 981–990.    
  • 35. Dong CG (2012) Feed-in tariff versus renewable portfolio standard: an empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development. Energ Policy 42: 476–485.    
  • 36. KLIEN (2012) Leitfaden Photovoltaic–Anlagen 2012. Eine Foerderaktion des Klima-und Energiefonds der Oesterreichischen Bundesregierung. KLIEN.
  • 37. Branker K, Pathak MJM, Pearce JM (2011) A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 4470–4482.    
  • 38. Kaltschmitt M (2013) Erneuerbare Energien Systemtechnik, Wirtschaftlichkeit, Umweltaspekte. Springer Vieweg, Berlin.
  • 39. Schmidt TS (2014) Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking. Nat Clim Change 4: 237–239.    
  • 40. UNEP/BNEF (2009) Private financing of renewable energy-A guide for policymakers. UNEP Sustainable Energy Finance Initiative, Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), Chatham House, London.
  • 41. Painuly JP (2001) Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis. Renew Energ 24: 73–89.    

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved