Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Cost of organic waste technologies: A case study for New Jersey

1 Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
2 The Ohio State University, Ohio 44691

Special Issues: Renewable energy systems and agro-residue management

This paper evaluates the benefits of converting food waste and manure to biogas and/or fertilizer, while focusing on four available waste treatment technologies: direct combustion, landfilling, composting, and anaerobic digestion. These four alternative technologies were simulated using municipal-level data on food waste and manure in New Jersey. The criteria used to assess the four technologies include technological productivity, economic benefits, and impact on land scarcity. Anaerobic digestion with gas collection has the highest technological productivity; using anaerobic digesters would supply electricity to nearly ten thousand families in New Jersey. In terms of economic benefits, the landfill to gas method is the least costly method of treating waste. In comparison, direct combustion is by far the most costly method of all four waste-to-energy technologies.
  Article Metrics

Keywords Organic waste; manure; combustion; land-fill gas; aerobic composting; anaerobic digestion

Citation: Gal Hochman, Shisi Wang, Qing Li, Paul D. Gottlieb, Fuqing Xu, Yebo Li. Cost of organic waste technologies: A case study for New Jersey. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(3): 450-462. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.3.450


  • 1. Diggelman C, Ham RK (2003) Household food waste to wastewater or to solid waste? That is the question. Waste manag res 21: 501-514.    
  • 2. Hall KD, Guo J, Dore M, et al. (2009) The progressive increase of food waste in America and its environmental impact. PLoS One 4: 1-6.    
  • 3. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  • 4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999) U.S. Methane Emissions 1990-2020: Inventories, Projections, and Opportunities for Reductions. available from:
    www.calystaenergy.com/pdfs/EPA Methane Emissions 1990-2020.pdf .
  • 5. Delgado CL (2003) Rising Consumption of Meat and Milk in Developing Countries Has Created a New Food Revolution. J Nutr 133: 3907S-3910S.
  • 6. Manale A (2006) Agriculture and the Developing World: Intensive Animal Production, a Growing Environmental Problem. Geo Int Envtl L Rev 19: 809.
  • 7. Krapac IG, Dey WS, Roy WR, et al. (2002) Impacts of swine manure pits on groundwater quality. Environl Pollut 120: 475-492.    
  • 8. Altekruse SF, Cohen ML, Swerdlow DL (1997) Emerging foodborne diseases. Emerg Infect Dis 3: 285-293.
  • 9. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2010) State Profile and Energy Estimates, New Jersey, available from: www.eia.gov/state/data.cfm?sid=NJ.
  • 10. Deublein D, Steinhausser A (2011) Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources. 2nd Ed. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & CO. KGaA.
  • 11. Buswell AM, Mueller HF (1952) Mechanism of methane fermentation. Ind Eng Chem res 44: 550-552.    
  • 12. Eleazer WE, Barlaz MA, Wang YS, et al. (1997) Methane Potential of food waste end anaerobic toxicity of leachate produced during food waste decomposition. Waste Manage Res 15: 149-167.    
  • 13. Engler C, Capereda S, Mukhtar S (2010) Assembly and Testing of an On-Farm Manure to Energy Conversion BMP for Animal Waste Pollution Control. Texas Water Resources Institute.
  • 14. Shishi W (2014) Modeling and analysis of utilizing food waste and manure in New Jersey. Thesis, Rutgers University.
  • 15. Kleis H, Dalager S (2004) 100 years of waste incineration in Denmark. Heron Kleis and Soren Dalager, Denmark.
  • 16. Bosmans A, Vanderreydt I, Geysen D, et al. (2013) The crucial role of Waste-to-Energy technologies in enhanced landfill mining: a technology review. J Clean Prod 55: 10-23.    
  • 17. Centore M, Hochman G, Ziberman D (2013) Worldwide Survey of Biodegradable Feedstocks, Waste-to-Energy Technologies, and Adoption of Technologies. In Modeling, Optimization and Bioeconomy.
  • 18. Bernstad A, la Cour Jansen J (2011) A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste-a Swedish full-scale case study. Waste manage 31:1879-1896.    
  • 19. Channiwala SA, Parikh PP (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81: 1051-1063.    
  • 20. Zhang R, El-Mashad HM, Karl Hartman, et al. (2007) Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol 98: 929-935.    
  • 21. Lamb D, Venkatraman K, Bolan N, et al. (2012) An Alternative Technology for the Sustainable Management of Landfill Sites. Environ Sci Technol 44: 561-637.
  • 22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011) An overview of Landfill Gas Energy in the United States, Landfill Methane Outreach Program (LMOP).
  • 23. Berger J, Fornés LV, Ott C, et al. (2005) Methane oxidation in a landfill cover with capillary barrier. Waste Manage 25: 369-373.
  • 24. Thompson AG, Wagner-Riddle C, Fleming R (2004) Emissions of N2O and CH4 during the composting of liquid swine manure. Environ monit assess 91 (1-3): 87-104.
  • 25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2013) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2011.
  • 26. Finnveden G, Moberg Å, Johansson J, et al. (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 2: landfilling compared to other treatment methods. J Clean Prod 13: 231-240.
  • 27. Guljajew N, Szapiro M (1962) Determining of heat energy volume released by waste during biothermal disposal. Sbornik Naucznych Robot: 135-141.
  • 28. Irvine G, Lamont ER, Antizar-Ladislao B (2010) Energy from waste: reuse of compost heat as a source of renewable energy. International Journal of Chemical Engineering 2010: 1-10.
  • 29. Jackson LE, Schimel JP, Firestone MK (1989) Short-term partitioning of ammonium and nitrate between plants and microbes in an annual grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 21: 409-415
  • 30. Shao L, Wang T, Li T, et al. (2013) Comparison of sludge digestion under aerobic and anaerobic conditions with a focus on the degradation of proteins at mesophilic temperature. Bioresource technol 140: 131-137.    
  • 31. Klejment E, Rosiński M (2008) Testing of thermal properties of compost from municipal waste with a view to using it as a renewable, low temperature heat source. Bioresource Technol 99: 8850-8855.    
  • 32. Mata-Alvarez J, Mace S, Llabres P (2000) Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresource technol 74: 3-16.
  • 33. Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, et al. (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results. J Clean Prod 13: 213-229.
  • 34. Speece RE (1996) Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters. Archae Press, USA. Environ Sci Technol 01/1996; 17.
  • 35. Karim K, Klasson KT, Drescher SR, et al. (2007) Mesophilic digestion kinetics of manure slurry. Appl biochem biotech 142: 231-242.
  • 36. van Haaren R, Themelis NJ, Barlaz M (2010) LCA comparison of windrow composting of yard wastes with use as alternative daily cover (ADC). Waste manage 30: 2649-2656.
  • 37. Steuteville R (1996) How much does it cost to compost yard trimmings? BioCycle 37: 39-46.
  • 38. EIA, US. 2010a. Annual energy outlook 2010.
  • 39. Zafar S (2011) Analyzing Different Waste-to-Energy Technology. BioCycle Magazine.
  • 40. EIA, US. 2010b. State Profile and Energy Estimates, New Jersey, Data.


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Mook Bangalore, Gal Hochman, David Zilberman, Policy incentives and adoption of agricultural anaerobic digestion: A survey of Europe and the United States, Renewable Energy, 2016, 97, 559, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.062
  • 2. Johnathon P. Sheets, Ajay Shah, Techno-economic comparison of biogas cleaning for grid injection, compressed natural gas, and biogas-to-methanol conversion technologies, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2018, 10.1002/bbb.1848
  • 3. C. E. Manyi-Loh, S. N. Mamphweli, E. L. Meyer, A. I. Okoh, Microbial anaerobic digestion: process dynamics and implications from the renewable energy, environmental and agronomy perspectives, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 10.1007/s13762-019-02380-w
  • 4. Nur Ayvaz-Cavdaroglu, Asli Coban, Irem Firtina-Ertis, Municipal solid waste management via mathematical modeling: A case study in İstanbul, Turkey, Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 244, 362, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.065
  • 5. Rammuni Dilini Vasundara Kumari Silva, Zhongfang Lei, Kazuya Shimizu, Zhenya Zhang, Hydrothermal treatment of sewage sludge to produce solid biofuel: Focus on fuel characteristics, Bioresource Technology Reports, 2020, 100453, 10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100453

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: 2015, Gal Hochman, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved