Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations of metalloproteins: A folding study of rubredoxin from Pyrococcus furiosus

1 Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM), University of Florence, Via Luigi Sacconi 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
2 Interuniversity Consortium of Magnetic Resonance of Metallo Proteins (CIRMMP), Via Luigi Sacconi 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
3 Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy

Topical Section: Structural analysis of macromolecules

The constant increase of computational power has made feasible to investigate the folding mechanism of small proteins using molecular dynamics (MD). Metal-binding proteins (metalloproteins) are usually complicated to model, largely due to the presence of the metal cofactor. Thus, the study of metal-coupled folding is still challenging. In this work, we addressed the folding process of Pyrococcus furiosus rubredoxin (PfRd), a 53-residue protein binding a single iron ion, using different MD methods. Starting from an extended conformation of the polypeptide chain where we preserved the coordination of the metal ion, a classical MD simulation and an extensive accelerated MD run were performed to reconstruct the folding process of the metal-bound protein. For comparison, we simulated also the dynamics of folded PfRd devoid of the metal cofactor (apo-form), starting from the folded structure. For these MD trajectories, we computed various structural and biochemical properties. In addition, we took advantage of available experimental data to quantify the degree to which our simulations sampled conformations close to the native folded state. We observed that the compaction of the hydrophobic core is the main feature driving the folding of the structure. However, we could not reach a fully folded conformation within our trajectories, because of the incomplete removal of the solvent from the core. Altogether, the various MD simulations, including that of the folded apo-form of the protein, suggest that an improvement in the accuracy of the protein force-field is still needed.
  Article Metrics

Keywords folding; rubredoxin; molecular dynamics; metal; iron; metalloproteins; simulation; forcefield; modelling

Citation: Davide Sala, Andrea Giachetti, Antonio Rosato. Molecular dynamics simulations of metalloproteins: A folding study of rubredoxin from Pyrococcus furiosus. AIMS Biophysics, 2018, 5(1): 77-96. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2018.1.77


  • 1. Klepeis JL, Lindorff-Larsen K, Dror RO, et al. (2009) Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19: 120–127.    
  • 2. Stone JE, Phillips JC, Freddolino PL, et al. (2007) Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J Comput Chem 28: 2618–2640.    
  • 3. Perez A, Morrone JA, Simmerling C, et al. (2016) Advances in free-energy-based simulations of protein folding and ligand binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 36: 25–31.    
  • 4. Lane TJ, Shukla D, Beauchamp KA, et al. (2013) To milliseconds and beyond: Challenges in the simulation of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23: 58–65.    
  • 5. Freddolino PL, Harrison CB, Liu Y, et al. (2010) Challenges in protein-folding simulations. Nat Phys 6: 751–758.    
  • 6. Best RB (2012) Atomistic molecular simulations of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22: 52–61.    
  • 7. Piana S, Lindorff-Larsen K, Shaw DE (2012) Protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics from atomistic simulation. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 17845–17850.
  • 8. Suárez E, Lettieri S, Zwier MC, et al. (2014) Simultaneous computation of dynamical and equilibrium information using a weighted ensemble of trajectories. J Chem Theory Comput 10: 2658–2667.    
  • 9. Pierce LCT, Salomon-Ferrer R, Augusto F. De Oliveira C, et al. (2012) Routine access to millisecond time scale events with accelerated molecular dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 8: 2997–3002.    
  • 10. Kubelka J, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA (2004) The protein folding "speed limit." Curr Opin Struct Biol 14: 76–88.    
  • 11. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, et al. (2011) How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334: 517–520.    
  • 12. Putignano V, Rosato A, Banci L, et al. (2018) MetalPDB in 2018: a database of metal sites in biological macromolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 459–464.
  • 13. Li W, Wang J, Zhang J, et al. (2015) Molecular simulations of metal-coupled protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 30: 25–31.    
  • 14. Bentrop D, Bertini I, Iacoviello R, et al. (1999) Structural and dynamical properties of a partially unfolded Fe4S4 protein: Role of the cofactor in protein folding. Biochemistry 38: 4669–4680.    
  • 15. Blake PR, Summers MF, Park JB, et al. (1991) Determinants of protein hyperthermostability: purification and amino acid sequence of rubredoxin from the hyperthermophilic archaebacterium pyrococcus furiosus and secondary structure of the zinc adduct by NMR. Biochemistry 30: 10885–10895.    
  • 16. Prakash S, Sundd M, Guptasarma P (2014) The key to the extraordinary thermal stability of P. furiosus holo-rubredoxin: Iron binding-guided packing of a core aromatic cluster responsible for high kinetic stability of the native structure. PLoS One 9: e89703.
  • 17. Hernandez G, Jenney FE, Adams MW, et al. (2000) Millisecond time scale conformational flexibility in a hyperthermophile protein at ambient temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 3166–3170.    
  • 18. Rader AJ (2010) Thermostability in rubredoxin and its relationship to mechanical rigidity. Phys Biol 7: 016002.
  • 19. Bonomi F, Iametti S, Ferranti P, et al. (2008) "Iron priming" guides folding of denatured aporubredoxins. J Biol Inorg Chem 13: 981–991.    
  • 20. Zartler ER, Jenney FE, Terrell M, et al. (2001) Structural basis for thermostability in aporubredoxins from Pyrococcus furiosus and Clostridium pasteurianum. Biochemistry 40: 7279–7290.    
  • 21. Cavagnero S, Debe DA, Zhou ZH, et al. (1998) Kinetic role of electrostatic interactions in the unfolding of hyperthermophilic and mesophilic rubredoxins. Biochemistry 37: 3369–3376.    
  • 22. Strop P, Mayo SL (1999) Rubredoxin variant folds without iron. J Am Chem Soc 121: 2341–2345.    
  • 23. Hamelberg D, Mongan J, McCammon JA (2004) Accelerated molecular dynamics: A promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. J Chem Phys 120: 11919–11929.    
  • 24. Doshi U, Hamelberg D (2015) Towards fast, rigorous and efficient conformational sampling of biomolecules: Advances in accelerated molecular dynamics. BBA-Gen Subjects 1850: 878–888.    
  • 25. Miao Y, Feixas F, Eun C (2015) Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding. J Comput Chem 36: 1536–1549.    
  • 26. Case DA, Cerutti DS, Cheatham TE, et al. (2017) Amber 2017, University of California, San Francisco.
  • 27. Carvalho ATP, Teixeira AFS, Ramos MJ (2013) Parameters for molecular dynamics simulations of iron-sulfur proteins. J Comput Chem 34: 1540–1548.    
  • 28. Bertini I, Case DA, Ferella L, et al. (2011) A grid-enabled web portal for NMR structure refinement with AMBER. Bioinformatics 27: 2384–2390.    
  • 29. Wassenaar TA, van Dijk M, Loureiro-Ferreira N, et al. (2012) WeNMR: Structural biology on the grid. J Grid Comput 10: 743–767.    
  • 30. Prompers JJ, Brüschweiler R, Bruschweiler R (2002) General framework for studying the dynamics of folded and nonfolded proteins by NMR relaxation spectroscopy and MD simulation. J Am Chem Soc 124: 4522–4534.    
  • 31. Korzhnev DM, Billeter M, Arseniev AS, et al. (2001) NMR studies of Brownian tumbling and internal motions in proteins. Prog Nucl Mag Res Sp 38: 197–266.    
  • 32. Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577–2637.    
  • 33. Rost B, Sander C (1993) Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 232: 584–599.    
  • 34. Li DW, Brüschweiler R (2012) PPM: A side-chain and backbone chemical shift predictor for the assessment of protein conformational ensembles. J Biomol NMR 54: 257–265.    
  • 35. Hiller R, Zhou ZH, Adams MW, et al. (1997) Stability and dynamics in a hyperthermophilic protein with melting temperature close to 200 degrees C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 11329–11332.    
  • 36. Ishima R, Torchia DA (2000) Protein dynamics from NMR. Nat Struct Biol 7: 740–743.    
  • 37. Jarymowycz VA, Stone MJ (2006) Fast time scale dynamics of protein backbones: NMR relaxation methods, applications, and functional consequences. Chem Rev 106: 1624–1671.    
  • 38. LeMaster DM (1999) NMR relaxation order parameter analysis of the dynamics of protein side chains. J Am Chem Soc 121: 1726–1742.    
  • 39. Ruschak AM, Kay LE (2010) Methyl groups as probes of supra-molecular structure, dynamics and function. J Biomol NMR 46: 75–87.    
  • 40. Bougault CM, Eidsness MK, Prestegard JH (2003) Hydrogen bonds in rubredoxins from mesophilic and hyperthermophilic organisms. Biochemistry 42: 4357–4372.    
  • 41. Prestegard JH, Bougault CM, Kishore AI (2004) Residual dipolar couplings in structure determination of biomolecules. Chem Rev 104: 3519–3540.    
  • 42. Cho-Chung YS, Pitot HC (1968) Regulatory effects of nicotinamide on tryptophan pyrrolase synthesis in rat liver in vivo. Eur J Biochem 3: 401–406.    
  • 43. Blasie CA, Berg JM (2002) Structur e-based thermodynamic analysis of a coupled metal binding-protein folding reaction involving a zinc finger peptide. Biochemistry 41: 15068–15073.    
  • 44. Weinkam P, Romesberg FE, Wolynes PG (2009) Chemical frustration in the protein folding landscape: Grand canonical ensemble simulations of cytochrome c. Biochemistry 48: 2394–2402.    
  • 45. Devereux M, Gresh N, Piquemal JP, et al. (2014) A supervised fitting approach to force field parametrization with application to the SIBFA polarizable force field. J Comput Chem 35: 1577–1591.    
  • 46. Wu R, Lu Z, Cao Z, et al. (2011) A transferable nonbonded pairwise force field to model zinc interactions in metalloproteins. J Chem Theory Comput 7: 433–443.    
  • 47. Sakharov DV, Lim C (2005) Zn protein simulations including charge transfer and local polarization effects. J Am Chem Soc 127: 4921–4929.    
  • 48. Chakravorty DK, Wang B, Lee CW, et al. (2012) Simulations of allosteric motions in the zinc sensor CzrA. J Am Chem Soc 134: 3367–3376.    
  • 49. Chakravorty DK, Parker TM, Guerra AJ, et al. (2013) Energetics of zinc-mediated interactions in the allosteric pathways of metal sensor proteins. J Am Chem Soc 135: 30–33.    
  • 50. Reyes-Caballero H, Campanello GC, Giedroc DP (2011) Metalloregulatory proteins: Metal selectivity and allosteric switching. Biophys Chem 156: 103–114.    
  • 51. Andrews CT, Elcock AH (2013) Molecular dynamics simulations of highly crowded amino acid solutions: comparisons of eight different force field combinations with experiment and with each other. J Chem Theory Comput 9: 4585–4602.    
  • 52. Abriata LA, Dal Peraro M (2015) Assessing the potential of atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to probe reversible protein-protein recognition and binding. Sci Rep 5: 10549.    


Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved