Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Emerging polymeric materials in additive manufacturing for use in biomedical applications

Polymer Science and Materials Chemistry, Exponent, Inc. 9 Strathmore Rd., Natick, MA USA

Special Issues: Additive Manufacturing: From Medical Applications to Synthetic Biology

Additive manufacturing is poised to enable the next biomedical revolution, where customized, patient-specific tools, therapies, pharmaceuticals, and even replacement organs are taking strides in the biomedical research and development space. Polymeric materials are capable of making inroads in a wide variety of biomedical applications, and in recent years a growing number are being used with additive manufacturing techniques. This review highlights some of the emerging classes of polymers used in additive manufacturing and examples of their use in biomedical applications, with a focus on the delineation of ‘hard’ polymers versus ‘soft’ polymers and the specific applications where they are utilized.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords additive manufacturing; polymers; biomedical applications

Citation: A. Sydney Gladman, Manuel Garcia-Leiner, Alexis F. Sauer-Budge. Emerging polymeric materials in additive manufacturing for use in biomedical applications. AIMS Bioengineering, 2019, 6(1): 1-20. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2019.1.1

References

  • 1. Gottlieb S (2017) Ushering in new era of 3D printing of medical products; provides guidance to manufacturers of medical devices. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Available from : https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm587547.htm.
  • 2. Frenkel SR, Jaffe WL, Dimaano F, et al. (2004) Bone response to a novel highly porous surface in a canine implantable chamber. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 71: 387–391.
  • 3. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2013) K123486 triathalon tritanium tibial baseplate. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K123486.
  • 4. Stryker Tritanium. In-growth technology built to fuse. Available from: http://www.stryker.com/builttofuse/#.
  • 5. Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M, et al. (2016) Emergence of 3D printed dosage forms: Opportunities and challenges. Pharm Res 33: 1817–1832.    
  • 6. Aprecia Pharmaceuticals. What is ZipDose technology? Available from: https://www.spritam.com/#/hcp/zipdose-technology/what-is-zipdose-technology.
  • 7. De Jesus C (2016) New Tritanium spinal implant fully integrates with the human body, Available from : https://futurism.com/3d-printed-tritanium-spinal-implant-simulates-actual-bone.
  • 8. Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, et al. (2016) 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online 15: 115.    
  • 9. Haglin JM, Eltorai AE, Gil JA, et al. (2016) Patient-specific orthopaedic implants. Orthop Surg 8: 417–424.    
  • 10. Hendel MD, Bryan JA, Barsoum WK, et al. (2012) Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: A randomized prospective clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94: 2167–2175.    
  • 11. Bauermeister AJ, Zuriarrain A, Newman MI (2016) Three-dimensional printing in plastic and reconstructive surgery: A systematic review. Ann Plast Surg 77: 569–576.    
  • 12. Lewis JA (2006) Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv Funct Mater 16: 2193–2204.    
  • 13. Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012: 10.
  • 14. Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: A critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83: 389–405.    
  • 15. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, et al. (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos Part B: Eng 143: 172–196.    
  • 16. Stratasys Ltd. our materials. Available from: https://www.stratasys.com/materials/search.
  • 17. Lyu S, Untereker D (2009) Degradability of polymers for implantable biomedical devices. Int J Mol Sci 10: 4033–4065.    
  • 18. Farah S, Anderson DG, Langer R (2016) Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications - A comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 107: 367–392.    
  • 19. Gupta B, Revagade N, Hilborn J (2007) Poly(lactic acid) fiber: An overview. Prog Poly Sci 32: 455–482.    
  • 20. Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21: 2529–2543.    
  • 21. Rasal RM, Janorkar AV, Hirt DE (2010) Poly (lactic acid) modifications. Prog Poly Sci 35: 338–356.    
  • 22. Natta FJv, Hill JW, Carothers WH (1934) Studies of polymerization and ring formation. XXIII.1 ε-Caprolactone and its polymers. J Am Chem Soc 56: 455–457.
  • 23. Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW (2010) The return of a forgotten polymer-Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Poly Sci 35: 1217–1256.    
  • 24. Athanasiou KA, Agrawal CM, Barber FA, et al. (1998) Orthopaedic applications for PLA-PGA biodegradable polymers. Arthroscopy 14: 726–737.    
  • 25. Ethicon Monocryl (poliglecaprone 25) suture. (2018) Available from: https://www.ethicon.com/emea/products/wound-closure/absorbable-sutures/monocryl-poliglecaprone-25-suture.
  • 26. Lowe CE (1954) Preparation of high molecular weight polyhydroxyacetic ester. USA Patent Office. US2668162A.
  • 27. Goonoo N, Jeetah R, Bhaw-Luximon A, et al. (2015) Polydioxanone-based bio-materials for tissue engineering and drug/gene delivery applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 97: 371–391.    
  • 28. Bartholomew RS (1981) PDS (polydioxanone suture): A new synthetic absorbable suture in cataract surgery. A preliminary study. Ophthalmologica 183: 81–85.
  • 29. Boland ED, Coleman BD, Barnes CP, et al. (2005) Electrospinning polydioxanone for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 1: 115–123.    
  • 30. Bard Ventrio Hernia Patch. (2018) Available from: https://www.crbard.com/Davol/en-US/products/Ventrio-Hernia-Patch.
  • 31. Gierek M, Kusnierz K, Lampe P, et al. (2018) Absorbable sutures in general surgery - review, available materials, and optimum choices. Pol Przegl Chir 90: 34–37.
  • 32. ConMed SmartNail Implant. Available from: http://www.conmed.com/en/products/orthopedics/knee/cartilage/cartilage-repair/smartnail-implant.
  • 33. Spineology Rampart O Interbody Fusion. Available from: https://www.spineology.com/united-states/our-products/rampart-o.
  • 34. FDA (2017) K163673 510K Summary Fortilink-C with TETRAfuse 3D Technology, available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf16/K163673.pdf.
  • 35. Herold F, Schneller A (1992) High-performance polymers. Adv Mater 4: 143–152.    
  • 36. Nguyen HX, Ishida H (1987) Poly(aryl-ether-ether-ketone) and its advanced composites - a review. Polym Composite 8: 57–73.    
  • 37. Fink JK (2008) High performance polymers. Norwich, NY: William Andrew, Inc.
  • 38. Kemmish D (2010) Update on the technology and applications of polyaryletherketones. Shawbury, UK: Smithers Rapra Publishing.
  • 39. Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28: 4845–4869.    
  • 40. Kurtz SM (2012) PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Inc.
  • 41. Garcia-Leiner M, Clay B, Ricou P (2014) High performance polymers in Selective Laser Sintering processes: Understanding structure and property; San Francisco, CA. ACS Fall 2014 National Meeting.
  • 42. Bertelo CA, Garcia-Leiner MA, DeCarmine A, et al. (2017) Heat treated polymer powders, USA, US 9587107.
  • 43. Cheng SZD, Ho RM, Hsiao BS, et al. (1996) Polymorphism and crystal structure identification in poly(aryl ether ketone ketone)s. Macromol Chem Phys 197: 185–213.    
  • 44. Gardner KH, Hsiao BS, Matheson RR, et al. (1992) Structure, crystallization and morphology of poly (aryl ether ketone ketone). Polymer 33: 2483–2495.    
  • 45. Klop EA, Lommerts BJ, Veurink J, et al. (1995) Polymorphism in alternating polyketones studied by X-ray-diffraction and calorimetry. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 33: 315–326.    
  • 46. OPM OsteoFab implantable medical devices (2018) Available from: http://oxfordpm.com/cmf-orthopedics.
  • 47. Berretta S (2015) Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) polymers for high temperature laser sintering (HT-LS): University of Exeter.
  • 48. Berretta S, Ghita O, Evans KE (2014) Morphology of polymeric powders in laser sintering (LS): From polyamide to new PEEK powders. EurPolym J 59: 218–229.
  • 49. Carbon dental materials (2018) Available from: https://www.carbon3d.com/industry/dental-materials/.
  • 50. Formlabs (2018) High-accuracy 3D printing materials for dental labs and practices. Available from: https://formlabs.com/materials/dental/.
  • 51. envisionTEC: Digital dentistry in action (2018) Available from: https://envisiontec.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2017-Dental-Materials-Final-08212017.pdf.
  • 52. Zopf DA, Hollister SJ, Nelson ME, et al. (2013) Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer. N Engl J Med 368: 2043–2045.    
  • 53. Form 2 dentistry resin (FormLabs) (2018) Available from: https://formlabs.com/industries/dental/ https://formlabs.com/materials/dental/.
  • 54. Valverde I, Gomez-Ciriza G, Hussain T, et al. (2017) Three-dimensional printed models for surgical planning of complex congenital heart defects: An international multicentre study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 52: 1139–1148.    
  • 55. e-NABLE 3D-printable prosethetic devices. Available from: https://3dprint.nih.gov/collections/prosthetics.
  • 56. Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21: 2529–2543.    
  • 57. Park SH, Yun BG, Won JY, et al. (2017) New application of three-dimensional printing biomaterial in nasal reconstruction. Laryngoscope 127: 1036–1043.    
  • 58. Shim JH, Kim JY, Park M, et al. (2011) Development of a hybrid scaffold with synthetic biomaterials and hydrogel using solid freeform fabrication technology. Biofabrication 3: 034102.    
  • 59. Giordano RA, Wu BM, Borland SW, et al. (1996) Mechanical properties of dense polylactic acid structures fabricated by three dimensional printing J Biomater Sci, 8: 63–75.
  • 60. Berretta S, Evans KE, Ghita O (2015) Processability of PEEK, a new polymer for high temperature laser sintering (HT-LS). Eur Polym J 68: 243–266.    
  • 61. Berretta S, Evans K, Ghita O (2018) Additive manufacture of PEEK cranial implants: Manufacturing considerations versus accuracy and mechanical performance. Mater Design 139: 141–152.    
  • 62. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5: 335–341.    
  • 63. Sher D (2015) Materialise partners with University of Michigan for 3D printed tracheal splints, Available from: https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/materialise-partners-with-university-of-michigan-for-3d-printed-tracheal-splints-63111/.
  • 64. Morrison RJ, Kashlan KN, Flanangan CL, et al. (2015) Regulatory considerations in the design and manufacturing of implantable 3D-printed medical devices. Clin Transl Sci 8: 594–600.    
  • 65. Mohseni M, Hutmacher D, Castro N (2018) Independent evaluation of medical-grade bioresorbable filaments for fused deposition modelling/fused filament fabrication of tissue engineered constructs. Polymers 10: 40.    
  • 66. Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, et al. (2015) 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 219: 521–529.    
  • 67. Oberoi G, Nitsch S, Edelmayer M, et al. (2018) 3D printing-encompassing the facets of dentistry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 6.
  • 68. Rosen JE, Size A, Yang Y, et al. (2015) Artificial hand for minimally invasive surgery: design and testing of initial prototype. Surg Endosc 29: 61–67.    
  • 69. Salmi M, Paloheimo KS, Tuomi J, et al. (2013) Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41: 603–609.    
  • 70. Lichtenberger JP, Tatum PS, Gada S, et al. (2018) Using 3D printing (additive manufacturing) to produce low-cost simulation models for medical training. Mil Med 183: 73–77.
  • 71. Zhao L, Zhou S, Fan T, et al. (2018) Three-dimensional printing enhances preparation for repair of double outlet right ventricular surgery. J Card Surg 33: 24–27.    
  • 72. Meess KM, Izzo RL, Dryjski ML, et al. (2017) 3D printed abdominal aortic aneurysm phantom for image guided surgical planning with a patient specific fenestrated endovascular graft system. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 10138.
  • 73. Torres IO, De Luccia N (2017) A simulator for training in endovascular aneurysm repair: The use of three dimensional printers. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 54: 247–253.    
  • 74. Raos P, Klapan I, Galeta T (2015) Additive manufacturing of medical models--Applications in rhinology. Coll Antropol 39: 667–673.
  • 75. Rose AS, Webster CE, Harrysson OL, et al. (2015) Pre-operative simulation of pediatric mastoid surgery with 3D-printed temporal bone models. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79: 740–744.    
  • 76. Vujaklija I, Farina D (2018) 3D printed upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Dev 15: 505–512.    
  • 77. Cuellar JS, Smit G, Zadpoor AA, et al. (2018) Ten guidelines for the design of non-assembly mechanisms: The case of 3D-printed prosthetic hands. P I Mech Eng H 232: 962–971.
  • 78. Gopinathan J, Noh I (2018) Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater Res 22: 11.    
  • 79. Jang T-S, Jung H-D, Pan HM, et al. (2018) 3D printing of hydrogel composite systems: Recent advances in technology for tissue engineering. Int J Bioprint 4: 126–127.
  • 80. Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, et al. (2018) 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater 3: 144–156.    
  • 81. OIS J&J's plans for smart & 3D printable contact lenses Available from: https://ois.net/jjs-plans-for-smart-3d-printable-contact-lenses/.
  • 82. Homan KA, Kolesky DB, Skylar-Scott MA, et al. (2016) Bioprinting of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on perfusable chips. Sci Rep 6: 34845.    
  • 83. Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, et al. (2016) Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA 113: 3179–3184.    
  • 84. Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al. (2014) 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater 26: 3124–3130.    
  • 85. He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, et al. (2016) Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Sci rep 6: 29977.    
  • 86. Bode F, da Silva MA, Smith P, et al. (2013) Hybrid gelation processes in enzymatically gelled gelatin: impact on nanostructure, macroscopic properties and cellular response. Soft Matter 9: 6986–6999.    
  • 87. Burdick JA, Prestwich GD (2011) Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 23: H41–H56.    
  • 88. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al. (2015) Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 73: 254–271.    
  • 89. Ondeck MG, Engler AJ (2016) Mechanical characterization of a dynamic and tunable methacrylated hyaluronic acid hydrogel. J Biomech Eng 138: 0210031–0210036.
  • 90. Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, et al. (2017) 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One 12: e0177628.    
  • 91. McBeth C, Lauer J, Ottersbach M, et al. (2017) 3D bioprinting of GelMA scaffolds triggers mineral deposition by primary human osteoblasts. Biofabrication 9: 015009.    
  • 92. Huettner N, Dargaville TR, Forget A (2018) Discovering cell-adhesion peptides in tissue engineering: Beyond RGD. Trends Biotechnol 36: 372–383.    
  • 93. Estomba CMC, Fernández IG, Otero MAI (2017) 3D printing for biomedical applications: Where are we now? EMJ 2: 16–22.
  • 94. Li J, Chen M, Fan X, et al. (2016) Recent advances in bioprinting techniques: Approaches, applications and future prospects. J Transl Med 14: 271.    
  • 95. Iwanaga S, Arai K, Nakamura M, (2015) Inkjet bioprinting. In: Atala A, Yoo JJ, Essentials of 3D Biofabrication and Translation, 4 Eds., Boston: Academic Press, 61–79.
  • 96. Liang H, He J, Chang J, et al. (2017) Coaxial nozzle-assisted electrohydrodynamic printing for microscale 3D cell-laden constructs. Int J Bioprint 4: 127.
  • 97. Campbell J, McGuinness I, Wirz H, et al. (2015) Multimaterial and multiscale three-dimensional bioprinter. J Nanotechno Eng Medicine 6: 021005–021020.    
  • 98. Hu N, Zhang YS, (2018) 3D bioprinting blood vessels. In: Thomas DJ, Jessop ZM, Whitaker IS, 3D Bioprinting for Reconstructive Surgery, 18 Eds Woodhead Publishing, 377–391.
  • 99. Lepowsky E, Tasoglu S (2018) 3D printing for drug manufacturing: A perspective on the future of pharmaceuticals. Int J Bioprint 4
  • 100. FDA (2018) SPRITAM (levetiracetam) tablets, Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2015/207958Orig1s000TOC.cfm.
  • 101. Spritam What is SPRITAM? Available from: https://www.spritam.com/#/patient/about-spritam/what-is-spritam.
  • 102. Horst DJ (2018) 3D printing of pharmaceutical drug delivery systems. Arc Org Inorg Chem Sci 1: 65–69.
  • 103. Larush L, Kaner I, Fluksman A, et al. (2017) 3D printing of responsive hydrogels for drug-delivery systems. J 3D Print Medicine 1: 219–229.    
  • 104. Gupta MK, Meng F, Johnson BN, et al. (2015) 3D printed programmable release capsules. Nano lett 15: 5321–5329.    
  • 105. Buwalda SJ, Vermonden T, Hennink WE (2017) Hydrogels for therapeutic delivery: Current developments and future directions. Biomacromolecules 18: 316–330.    
  • 106. Lim SH, Kathuria H, Tan JJY, et al. (2018) 3D printed drug delivery and testing systems - a passing fad or the future? Adv Drug Deliver Rev 132: 139–168.    
  • 107. Cloonan AJ, Shahmirzadi D, Li RX, et al. (2014) 3D-printed tissue-mimicking phantoms for medical imaging and computational validation applications. 3D print addi manuf 1: 14–23.    
  • 108. Wang K, Ho C-C, Zhang C, et al. (2017) A review on the 3D printing of functional structures for medical phantoms and regenerated tissue and organ applications. Engineering 3: 653–662.    
  • 109. Tappa K, Jammalamadaka U (2018) Novel biomaterials used in medical 3D printing techniques. J Funct Biomater 9: 17–33.    
  • 110. Hosny A, Keating SJ, Dilley JD, et al. (2018) From improved diagnostics to presurgical planning: high-resolution functionally graded multimaterial 3D printing of biomedical tomographic data sets. 3D print addi manuf 5: 103–113.    
  • 111. Shusteff M, Browar AEM, Kelly BE, et al. (2017) One-step volumetric additive manufacturing of complex polymer structures. Sci Adv 3: eaao5496.    
  • 112. Gladman AS, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, et al. (2016) Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat Mater 15: 413–418.    

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved