Inflation, unemployment and subjective wellbeing: nonlinear and asymmetric influences of economic growth

Duncan O. Hongo; Fanglin Li; Max William Ssali; Maurice Simiyu Nyaranga; Zephaniah Moriaso Musamba; Brenda Nelima Lusaka; Duncan O. Hongo; Fanglin Li; Max William Ssali; Maurice Simiyu Nyaranga; Zephaniah Moriaso Musamba; Brenda Nelima Lusaka

doi:10.3934/NAR.2020001

National Accounting Review

2020, Volume 2, Issue 1: 1-25. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2020001

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Inflation, unemployment and subjective wellbeing: nonlinear and asymmetric influences of economic growth

1.
School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212013, P. R. China
2.
School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212013, P. R. China

Received: 07 October 2019 Accepted: 03 November 2019 Published: 07 November 2019
JEL Codes: E32, C33, C22, D10

Plausible economic growth would undoubtedly offset the unemployment-output tradeoff to subjective wellbeing and relieving labor market discrepancies. This study expands on the tradeoff exploration considering the impact of unemployment-inflation on SWB and, output growth on unemployment using output gap as the tradeoff regulator and using a quadratic specification and the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag, respectively. Authors explored this effects and specifically the nonlinear response of subjective wellbeing (SWB) to inflation, unemployment and output, and the asymmetric responses by unemployment to business cycle output for Kenya. The main results report that first, output per capita gap is important in regulating the inflation-unemployment tradeoff and negativities to SWB with costlier effects by unemployment than inflation. Secondly, unemployment trades off with long run shocks in cyclical output although they exhibit symmetric nature of Okun law. Thirdly, unemployment negatively relates to fiscal policy in the long run as the tradeoff is supported. Therefore, to alleviate SWB, feasible unemployment alleviation policies are required while to incarcerate the persisting unemployment and minimizing labor market discrepancies, feasible labor supply and fiscal side policies should be implemented since short run and including policy specific reforms. This, would therefore supplement the usually time-lagging effects by implemented structural reforms.
- tradeoff,
- subjective wellbeing,
- cyclical unemployment,
- asymmetries
Citation: Duncan O. Hongo, Fanglin Li, Max William Ssali, Maurice Simiyu Nyaranga, Zephaniah Moriaso Musamba, Brenda Nelima Lusaka. Inflation, unemployment and subjective wellbeing: nonlinear and asymmetric influences of economic growth[J]. National Accounting Review, 2020, 2(1): 1-25. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2020001

Related Papers:

Abstract

Plausible economic growth would undoubtedly offset the unemployment-output tradeoff to subjective wellbeing and relieving labor market discrepancies. This study expands on the tradeoff exploration considering the impact of unemployment-inflation on SWB and, output growth on unemployment using output gap as the tradeoff regulator and using a quadratic specification and the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag, respectively. Authors explored this effects and specifically the nonlinear response of subjective wellbeing (SWB) to inflation, unemployment and output, and the asymmetric responses by unemployment to business cycle output for Kenya. The main results report that first, output per capita gap is important in regulating the inflation-unemployment tradeoff and negativities to SWB with costlier effects by unemployment than inflation. Secondly, unemployment trades off with long run shocks in cyclical output although they exhibit symmetric nature of Okun law. Thirdly, unemployment negatively relates to fiscal policy in the long run as the tradeoff is supported. Therefore, to alleviate SWB, feasible unemployment alleviation policies are required while to incarcerate the persisting unemployment and minimizing labor market discrepancies, feasible labor supply and fiscal side policies should be implemented since short run and including policy specific reforms. This, would therefore supplement the usually time-lagging effects by implemented structural reforms.

References

[1]	Anderson D, Hunt B, Snudden S (2014) Fiscal consolidation in the euro area: How much pain can structural reforms ease? J Policy Model 36: 785-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2014.08.005
[2]	Beyaert A, and García-Solanes J (2014) Output gap and non-linear economic convergence. J Policy Model 36: 121-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.11.001
[3]	Blanchflower DG, Bell DNF, Montagnoli A, et al. (2014) The happiness trade‐off between unemployment and inflation. J Money Credit Bank 46: 117-141. doi: 10.1111/jmcb.12154
[4]	Chadi A (2014) Regional unemployment and norm-induced effects on life satisfaction. Empir Econ 46: 1111-1141. doi: 10.1007/s00181-013-0712-7
[5]	Clark AE (2003) Unemployment as a social norm: Psychological evidence from panel data. J Labor Econ 21: 323-351. doi: 10.1086/345560
[6]	Clark A, Knabe A, Rätzel S (2010) Boon or bane? Others' unemployment, well-being and job insecurity. Labour Econ 17: 52-61.
[7]	Cosar EE, Yavuz AA (2019) Is There Asymmetry between GDP and Labor Market Variables in Turkey under Okun's Law?
[8]	Di Tella R, MacCulloch RJ, Oswald AJ (2001) Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. Am Econ Rev 91: 335-341. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.1.335
[9]	Diener E, Sandvik E, Seidlitz L, et al. (1993) The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute?. Soc Indic Res 28: 195-223. doi: 10.1007/BF01079018
[10]	Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence, In Nations and households in economic growth, 89-125. Elsevier.
[11]	Easterlin RA (2013) Happiness, growth, and public policy. Econ Inquiry 51: 1-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00505.x
[12]	Fernández-Villaverde J, Guerrón-Quintana P, Rubio-Ramírez JF (2014) Supply-side policies and the zero lower bound. IMF Econ Rev 62: 248-260. doi: 10.1057/imfer.2014.10
[13]	Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40: 402-435. doi: 10.1257/jel.40.2.402
[14]	Helliwell JF, Huang H (2014) New measures of the costs of unemployment: Evidence from the subjective well‐being of 3.3 million Americans. Econ Inquiry 52: 1485-1502. doi: 10.1111/ecin.12093
[15]	Hongo DO, Li F, Ssali MW (2019) Trade-Off Phillips Curve, Inflation and Economic Implication: The Kenyan Case. Int J Econ Financ 11: 60.
[16]	Junior JA, Katz AM, Ahn R (2016) The Perspectives of Young Women in Rural Western Kenya on Unconditional Cash Transfers. Poverty Public Policy 8: 72-94. doi: 10.1002/pop4.127
[17]	Levine M (2019) The Behavioral Determinants of Well-Being in Sierra Leone.
[18]	Lim GC, Dixon RJ, van Ours JC (2019) Beyond Okun's Law: Output Growth and Labor Market Flows.
[19]	Lucas RE, Clark AE, Georgellis Y, et al. (2004) Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychol Sci 15: 8-13. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501002.x
[20]	Luhmann M, Hofmann W, Eid M, et al. (2012) Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis. J Personality Soci Psychol 102: 592. doi: 10.1037/a0025948
[21]	Marinkov M, Geldenhuys J (2007) Cyclical unemployment and cyclical output: An estimation of Okun's coefficient for South Africa. South Afr J Econ 75: 373-390. doi: 10.1111/j.1813-6982.2007.00134.x
[22]	Nyaranga MS, Hao C, Hongo DO (2019) Strategies of Integrating Public Participation in Governance for Sustainable Development in Kenya. Public Policy Admin Res 9.
[23]	Ouardighi JE, Munier F (2019) Inflation, Unemployment and Happiness: empirical evidences of the contribution of Economic Growth. Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
[24]	Perman R, Tavera C (20050 A cross-country analysis of the Okun's law coefficient convergence in Europe. Appl Econ 37: 2501-2513.
[25]	Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ, et al. (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Economet 16: 289-326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616
[26]	Saraceno F (2016) The ECB: a reluctant leading character of the EMU play. Econ Politica 33: 129-151. doi: 10.1007/s40888-016-0032-4
[27]	Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework, In Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt, 281-314. Springer.
[28]	Silvapulle P, Moosa IA, Silvapulle MJ (2004) Asymmetry in Okun's law. Can J Econ/Revue canadienne d'économique 37: 353-374. doi: 10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.00006.x
[29]	Ssali MW, Du J, Mensah IA (2019) Investigating the nexus among environmental pollution, economic growth, energy use, and foreign direct investment in 6 selected sub-Saharan African countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26: 11245-11260. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04455-0
[30]	Subbo W (2007) An Overview of structural Adjustment programmes in Kenya, University of Nairobi.
[31]	Tang B, Bethencourt C (2017) Asymmetric unemployment-output tradeoff in the Eurozone. J Policy Model 39: 461-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.01.003
[32]	Tella RD, MacCulloch RJ, Oswald AJ (2003) The macroeconomics of happiness. Rev Econ Stat 85: 809-827. doi: 10.1162/003465303772815745
[33]	Villaverde J, Maza A (2009) The robustness of Okun's law in Spain, 1980-2004: Regional evidence. J Policy Model 31: 289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2008.09.003
[34]	Welsch H, Kühling J (2011) How Has the Crisis of 2008-2009 Affected Subjective Well-Being?, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere.
[35]	Welsch H, Kühling J (2016) Macroeconomic performance and institutional change: evidence from subjective well-being data. J Appl Econ 19: 193-217. doi: 10.1016/S1514-0326(16)30008-3
[36]	Wolbring T, Keuschnigg M, Negele E (2011) Needs, comparisons, and adaptation: The importance of relative income for life satisfaction. Eur Soc Rev 29: 86-104.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)