Review

Epochal neuroinflammatory role of high mobility group box 1 in central nervous system diseases

  • The central nervous system (CNS) is enriched with a developed reaction reserve dubbed “neuroinflammation”, which facilitates it to cope with pathogens, toxins, traumata and degeneration. Inflammation is a significant biological activity in reaction to injury, infection, and trauma agonized by cells or tissues. A positive inflammatory reaction mechanism removes attacking pathogens, initiating wound healing and angiogenesis. The High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) protein is abundant and ubiquitous nuclear proteins that bind to DNA, nucleosome and other multi-protein complexes in a dynamic and reversible fashion to regulate DNA processing in the context of chromatin. Complex genetic and physiological variations as well as environmental factors that drive emergence of chromosomal instability, development of unscheduled cell death, skewed differentiation, and altered metabolism are central to the pathogenesis of human diseases and disorders. HMGB1 protein, senses and coordinates the cellular stress response and plays a critical role not only inside of the cell as a DNA chaperone, chromosome guardian, autophagy sustainer, and protector from apoptotic cell death, but also outside the cell as the prototypic damage associated molecular pattern molecule (DAMP). This DAMP, in conjunction with other factors such as cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor activity, orchestrating the inflammatory and immune response. All of these characteristics make HMGB1 a critical molecular target in multiple human diseases including infectious diseases, ischemia, immune disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders, and cancer. With regards to these various disease condition above, our review focus on the role of HMGB1 and CNS Diseases.

    Citation: Seidu A. Richard, Wu Min, Zhaoliang Su, Hua-Xi Xu. Epochal neuroinflammatory role of high mobility group box 1 in central nervous system diseases[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(2): 185-218. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.2.185

    Related Papers:

    [1] Rashid Jan, Imtiaz Ahmad, Hijaz Ahmad, Narcisa Vrinceanu, Adrian Gheorghe Hasegan . Insights into dengue transmission modeling: Index of memory, carriers, and vaccination dynamics explored via non-integer derivative. AIMS Bioengineering, 2024, 11(1): 44-65. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2024004
    [2] Ali Raza, Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Muhammad Sajid Iqbal, Aqeel Ahmad . Simulation and numerical solution of fractional order Ebola virus model with novel technique. AIMS Bioengineering, 2020, 7(4): 194-207. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2020017
    [3] Honar J. Hamad, Sarbaz H. A. Khoshnaw, Muhammad Shahzad . Model analysis for an HIV infectious disease using elasticity and sensitivity techniques. AIMS Bioengineering, 2024, 11(3): 281-300. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2024015
    [4] Atta Ullah, Hamzah Sakidin, Shehza Gul, Kamal Shah, Yaman Hamed, Maggie Aphane, Thabet Abdeljawad . Sensitivity analysis-based control strategies of a mathematical model for reducing marijuana smoking. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(4): 491-510. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023028
    [5] Mehmet Yavuz, Waled Yavız Ahmed Haydar . A new mathematical modelling and parameter estimation of COVID-19: a case study in Iraq. AIMS Bioengineering, 2022, 9(4): 420-446. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2022030
    [6] Mariem Jelassi, Kayode Oshinubi, Mustapha Rachdi, Jacques Demongeot . Epidemic dynamics on social interaction networks. AIMS Bioengineering, 2022, 9(4): 348-361. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2022025
    [7] Kayode Oshinubi, Augustina Amakor, Olumuyiwa James Peter, Mustapha Rachdi, Jacques Demongeot . Approach to COVID-19 time series data using deep learning and spectral analysis methods. AIMS Bioengineering, 2022, 9(1): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2022001
    [8] Chrisogoni Paschal, Mwemezi J. Rwiza, Karoli N. Njau . Application of sustainability indicators for the evaluation and selection of robust organic-rich wastewater treatment technology for resource recovery. AIMS Bioengineering, 2024, 11(3): 439-477. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2024020
    [9] Daniel Borchert, Diego A. Suarez-Zuluaga, Yvonne E. Thomassen, Christoph Herwig . Risk assessment and integrated process modeling–an improved QbD approach for the development of the bioprocess control strategy. AIMS Bioengineering, 2020, 7(4): 254-271. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2020022
    [10] Liwei Chen, Jaslyn Lee, Wei Ning Chen . The use of metabolic engineering to produce fatty acid-derived biofuel and chemicals in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review. AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(4): 468-492. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.4.468
  • The central nervous system (CNS) is enriched with a developed reaction reserve dubbed “neuroinflammation”, which facilitates it to cope with pathogens, toxins, traumata and degeneration. Inflammation is a significant biological activity in reaction to injury, infection, and trauma agonized by cells or tissues. A positive inflammatory reaction mechanism removes attacking pathogens, initiating wound healing and angiogenesis. The High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) protein is abundant and ubiquitous nuclear proteins that bind to DNA, nucleosome and other multi-protein complexes in a dynamic and reversible fashion to regulate DNA processing in the context of chromatin. Complex genetic and physiological variations as well as environmental factors that drive emergence of chromosomal instability, development of unscheduled cell death, skewed differentiation, and altered metabolism are central to the pathogenesis of human diseases and disorders. HMGB1 protein, senses and coordinates the cellular stress response and plays a critical role not only inside of the cell as a DNA chaperone, chromosome guardian, autophagy sustainer, and protector from apoptotic cell death, but also outside the cell as the prototypic damage associated molecular pattern molecule (DAMP). This DAMP, in conjunction with other factors such as cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor activity, orchestrating the inflammatory and immune response. All of these characteristics make HMGB1 a critical molecular target in multiple human diseases including infectious diseases, ischemia, immune disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders, and cancer. With regards to these various disease condition above, our review focus on the role of HMGB1 and CNS Diseases.


    Tungiasis is a parasitic skin condition brought on by female sand fleas and is sometimes referred to as jiggers or sand flea infestation. Tropical and subtropical regions, especially the regions of America, Asia, Africa and the Caribbean, are infected with this disease. The flea enters into the skin, usually in areas where the skin is thin, such as the toes, heels and the spaces between toes and fingers [1]. The female sand flea burrows into the skin and grows into a small, swollen, and painful lesion, often resembling a tiny white or black dot. The flea then lays eggs inside this lesion and after development to complete the life cycle. The primary symptom of tungiasis is intense itching, leading to scratching, which can cause secondary bacterial infections. The affected area may become red, swollen, and painful. Over time, the lesions may grow larger and more uncomfortable [2]. Tungiasis is usually diagnosed based on clinical signs and symptoms. The presence of a specific lesion in the toes or feet, especially in areas with a history of sand flea infestations, helps with diagnosis [3]. The most effective treatment for tungiasis is the removal of the embedded sand fleas using sterilized instruments or a needle. The lesion should be cleaned and disinfected to prevent infections. In severe cases, topical antibiotics may be prescribed if secondary infections have developed [4]. Preventive measures include avoiding walking barefoot in sandy or contaminated areas and wearing protective footwear.

    Surgical extraction of embedded sand fleas under sterile medical conditions [5] can also be considered an efficacious therapeutic approach for its management. Tungiasis is a preventable condition, but it can cause significant discomfort and complications if left untreated [6]. If you suspect you have tungiasis or are experiencing symptoms, it is essential to seek medical attention for proper diagnosis and treatment. The infected areas often experience subpar living conditions and inadequate sanitation, making the inhabitants particularly susceptible to the infestation [7]. The afflicted populations face serious health and economical difficulties as a result of this neglected tropical illness. The mechanics of tungiasis transmission must be understood in order to adopt effective control measures and lessen the disease's effects. Jiggers, chigoe flea infection, and pulex penetrans infestation are a few of the historical names for tungiasis [8]. The female sand flea that transmits the disease burrows into the skin, concentrating on the feet, causing painful sores, inflammatory reactions, and secondary infections if left untreated.

    Mathematical models have significantly contributed to enhancing comprehension of the fundamental mechanisms of biological processes for public health [9][15]. Over the years, researchers and public health experts have dedicated significant efforts to gain insight into the spread of various infections [16]. Previous research has concentrated on a variety of disease-related topics [17], [18], from clinical symptoms and epidemiology to control methods and therapies. The frequency and geographic distribution of tungiasis have been examined in studies, revealing insight on the disease's burden and its effects on afflicted people [19], [20]. Kahuru et al conducted a study focused on employing an optimal control approach within a mathematical model to analyze the dynamics of tungiasis within a community [21]. The researchers in [22] established the stability results of the transmission dynamics of the disease. After that, the theory of optimal control is utilized, all with the ultimate goal of reducing the numbers of infested humans, infested animals, and sand flea populations [23]. The processes of disease transmission and the potential effects of interventions like better sanitation, health education, and treatment campaigns have both benefited greatly from these modeling studies [24]. Mathematical modeling of infectious diseases enhances our understanding of the diseases, facilitates evidence-based decision-making, and helps implement targeted interventions to reduce the burden of the condition in affected communities. In this work, we will enhance our scientific comprehension of tungiasis dynamics to provide more valuable perspectives for efficient management approaches. Through the utilization of mathematical modeling and simulation methods, we will evaluate the prospective consequences of treatments and facilitate decision-making within the realm of public health to improve the effectiveness of interventions and control measures.

    Fractional calculus is a branch of mathematics that deals with derivatives and integrals of non-integer orders. It extends the concepts of traditional calculus, which involves integer-order derivatives and integrals. Fractional calculus has found applications in various scientific fields [25][30], including epidemiology, where it can be used to model the spread of infectious diseases. It has been acknowledged that fractional calculus offers a more flexible framework for describing complex real-world problems [31], [32]. The Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative is a type of fractional derivative that has been applied to various mathematical models, including epidemic models [33], [34]. Fractional calculus generalizes the concept of traditional derivatives and integrals to non-integer orders, allowing for a more flexible representation of complex phenomena, such as anomalous diffusion or power-law behaviors [35]. In the context of epidemic models, the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative has been utilized to introduce memory effects and long-range interactions into the system. In addition to this, these models can capture more realistic scenarios and provide insights into the long-term behavior of infectious diseases. Hence, we choose to represent the dynamics of tungiasis using a fractional framework to obtain more precise results.

    This article is organized as follows: The fundamental concepts and results of the fractional theory related to the ABC operator is presented in Section 2. In Section 3, we formulated a mathematical model for tungiasis through the ABC operator in the fractional framework. In Section 4, the suggested model is subsequently examined. In Section 5, the solution of the recommended model is investigated with the help of fixed-point theory. Then, we introduced a numerical scheme to highlight the dynamical behaviour of the system in Section 6. Finally, ending remarks of the work are presented with future work in Section 7.

    The main relevant findings and definitions of classical Caputo[36] and Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivatives[37] will be presented here and will be useful in the following portion of the paper.

    Definition 2.1. Let f:[p,q]R be a given function, then the fractional derivative of Caputo fractional derivative of order j is given by

    CpDjt(u(t))=1Γ(nj)tpun(κ)(tκ)nj1dκ,

    for j(n1,n), where nZ.

    Definition 2.2. The Atangana-Beleanu fractional derivative for a given function f in the Caputo form is introduced as

    ABCpDjtf(t)=B(j)1jtpf(κ)Ej[j(tκ)j1j]dκ,

    where fH1(p,q), q > p, and j[0,1]. In addition to this, B(j) is the normalization function which satisfies the condition B(0) = B(1) = 1.

    Definition 2.3. The integral of the ABC derivative is denoted by ABCpIjtf(t) and is defined as:

    ABCpIjtf(t)=1jB(j)f(t)+jB(j)Γ(j)tpf(κ)(tκ)j1dκ.

    Theorem 2.1. Assume f in a manner that fC[p,q], then we have the equation below mentioned in [37]:

    ABCpDȷt(f(t))<B(ȷ)1ȷf(t),wheref(t)=maxptq|f(t)|.

    Furthermore, it has been established that ABC derivatives satisfy the Lipschitz condition [37].

    ABCpDȷtf1(t)ABCpDȷtf2(t)<ϑ1f1(t)f2(t).

    Here we present a mathematical model of Tungiasis disease. In this approach, the total population is divided into four categories: group that practices good hygiene (P), susceptible (S), infected (I), and treated (T) groups. Then, the total population is

    N(t)=P(t)+S(t)+I(t)+T(t).

    At birth, the population that is most susceptible is recruited at a rate of (1γ)υ, whereas the group that practices good hygiene is recruited at γυ where υ represents the rate of recruitment at birth and γ represents the likelihood of being recruited into the category of good hygiene practices. The appropriate hygiene practice group (P) develops susceptibility (S) at a rate of φ. Individuals from the class (S) move to the class (I) with a rate Г. The infected individuals (I) transfer to the treated group (T) at a rate of ρ following therapy. We indicated the natural death rate by µ. The infection rate Г is defined as

    Γ=σεIN,

    where ϵ is the contact rate with infected people and σ is the likelihood of being infected after repeated exposure to infected people. Then our model with the above assumptions for tungiasis disease is as follows:

    {dPdt=γυ(φ+μ)P,dSdt=(1γ)υ+φP(Γ+μ)S,dIdt=ΓS(ω+ϱ+μ)I,dTdt=ϱIμT, (3.1)

    with appropriate initial condition

    P(0)>0, S(0)>0, I(0)>0, T(0)>0. (3.2)
    Table 1.  Parameter values with interpretation used in the proposed system.
    Parameter Interpretation
    γ Probability of recruitment in P(t)
    υ Birth or recruitment rate
    φ The losing rate of protection
    µ Death occurs naturally in each class
    Г Infection rate from susceptible to infected class
    ω Disease induced mortality rate
    ρ Treatment rate for the infection
    σ Rate of transmission of the infection
    ϵ Contact rate of infection

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    It is acknowledged that epidemic models through the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative can more accurately represents the dynamics of infectious diseases than conventional integer derivatives. This inclusion enables a more comprehensive exploration of epidemic spread in intricate settings characterized by long-range interactions and memory effects, fostering an improved comprehension of the underlying mechanisms. Consequently, the refined insights gained from these fractional derivative-based models hold the potential to enhance the precision of epidemic predictions and facilitate the development of more efficacious control strategies. Nonetheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the introduction of fractional derivatives into mathematical models may introduce increased system complexity, necessitating the utilization of specialized mathematical and numerical techniques for rigorous analysis and simulation. Thus, the model (3.1) recommended above can be written in fractional form as

    {ABC0DȷtP=γυ(φ+μ)P,ABC0DȷtS=(1γ)υ+φP(Γ+μ)S,ABC0DȷtI=ΓS(ω+ϱ+μ)I,ABC0DȷtT=ϱIμT. (3.3)

    All of the parameters in the recommended model (3.1) for tungiasis disease are considered to be positive. Furthermore, the term ABC0Djt in the above model indicates the ABC derivative. The effects of memory which arise in the epidemiological process but are not incorporated in the classical operators, are the driving force behind fractional order models. In Table 1, we illustrated the parameters of the recommended model with description.

    In this section, we deal with some analysis of the model, like steady-state analysis, and find the basic reproduction ratio R0 for the above model (3.3). As the system (3.3) models the population of humans, all state variable solutions with nonnegative beginning conditions are nonnegative t>0 and have a feasible region bound as follows:

    Ξ=((P,S,I,T)R4+;S,P,I,T0;Nυμ).

    In the upcoming step, we will focus on the steady-states of the suggested system of the infection. First, we take the following:

    ABC0DȷtP=ABC0DȷtS=ABC0DȷtI=ABC0DȷtT=0,

    then, the model (3.3) becomes

    {0=γυ(φ+μ)P,0=(1γ)υ+φP(Γ+μ)S,0=ΓS(ω+ϱ+μ)I,0=ϱIμT. (4.1)

    The disease-free equilibrium of an epidemic model refers to a stable state where the infectious disease has been eliminated from the population. Understanding the disease-free equilibrium is essential in assessing the effectiveness of control strategies and vaccination programs. It serves as a benchmark to measure the success of public health interventions in eliminating or controlling infectious diseases and preventing outbreaks. For the infection-free steady-state, we set

    P=Po,S=So,I=Io,T=To  and  N=No.

    Thus, we have

    Eo=(Po,So,Io,To)=(0,(1γ)υ(Γ+μ),0,0).

    The endemic equilibrium (EE) of an epidemic model refers to a stable state where the prevalence of the infectious disease remains constant over time. Understanding the endemic equilibrium of an epidemic model is crucial in assessing the long-term behavior of the infection and evaluating the quality of control measures in maintaining the disease at a manageable level. It provides valuable insights into the stability and persistence of the infection in a population and is a fundamental concept in the study of infectious disease dynamics. We indicate the EE of the system by (E*) and substitute Γ=σεIN. Then from (4.1), we have

    {0=γυ(φ+μ)P,0=(1γ)υ+φP(σεIN+μ)S,0=σεINS(ω+ϱ+μ)I,0=ϱIμT. (4.2)

    Solving the above system (4.2), we have

    E(PSIT)=E(γυφ+μN(ω+ϱ+μ)σε1(ω+ϱ+μ)[(φγμ+μ)υ(φ+μ)Nμ(ω+ϱ+μ)σε]ϱμ(ω+ϱ+μ)[(φγμ+μ)υ(φ+μ)Nμ(ω+ϱ+μ)σε]).

    The basic reproduction number is a fundamental concept in epidemiology that quantifies the potential of an infection to spread. It represents the average number of secondary infections generated by a single infected individual in a fully susceptible environment. If the basic reproduction number is less than 1, it means that, on average, each infected individual will cause fewer than one new infection during their infectious period. In this case, the disease will not be able to sustain itself in the population, and it will eventually die out. If this parameter is equal to 1, this implies that, on average, each infected individual will cause exactly one new infection during their infectious period. The disease will reach a stable endemic equilibrium, where the number of new infections is balanced by the number of recoveries, resulting in a constant prevalence of the disease in the population. If this parameter is greater than 1, this implies that each infected individual, on average, will cause more than one new infection during their infectious period. In this case, the disease has the potential to spread, and if left uncontrolled, it may lead to an epidemic outbreak.

    We symbolized this number as R0 and calculate it through the next-generation matrix method [38]. We take the infected class of the system (3.1), so we have

    ABC0DȷtI=ΓS(ω+ϱ+μ)I. (4.3)

    Let F be the matrix containing parameters that are entering into infected class and V be the matrix containing those parameters that leave infected classes while neglecting the negative signs, so we get

    F=ΓS=σεISN,

    and

    V=(ω+ϱ+μ)I.

    This implies that R0=σεω+ϱ+μ, which is the required R0 of the recommended system.

    Theorem 4.1. For j = 1, the infection-free steady-state E0 of the system (3.3) is locally asymptotically stable if R0<1, otherwise it is unstable.

    Proof. Let j = 1 and take the Jacobian matrix of the model (3.3) at infection-free steady-state E0 as

    J(Eo)=[(φ+μ)000φ(σεIoN+μ)σεIoN00σεIoNσεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ)000ϱμ].

    The above Jacobian matrix has the following characteristic equation:

    |J(Eo)λI|=0,

    furthermore, we have

    |(φ+μ)λ000φ(σεIoN+μ)λσεIoN00σεIoNσεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ)λ000ϱμλ|=0,

    and simplifying, we have

    ((φ+μ)λ)|(σεIoN+μ)λσεIoN0σεIoNσεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ)λ00ϱμλ|=0,

    which implies that λ1=(ϕ+µ) and

    |(σεIoN+μ)λσεIoN0σεIoNσεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ)λ00ϱμλ|=0,

    the simplification of which implies that

    (μλ)|(σεIoN+μ)λσεIoNσεIoNσεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ)λ|=0.

    From the above, we have λ2=µ and

    |(σεIoN+μ)λσεIoNσεIoNσεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ)λ|=0

    Hence, all the eigen values are negative. Furthermore, we have J1(E0) given by

    J1(E0)=[(σεIoN+μ)σεIoNσεIoNσεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ)]=0.

    To show the required result, we have to show that Tace(J1(Eo))<0 and Det(J1(Eo))>0, so

    Trace(J1(Eo))=(σεIoN+μ)+σεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ),
    =μ+σε(ϱ+ω+μ),
    =μ+σεϱωμ,
    =2μ+σε(ϱ+ω),
    Trace(J1(E0))=(2μσε+(ϱ+ω))<0,

    which implies that

    Trace(J1(Eo))<0.

    Also, we have

    Det(J1(E0))=|(σεIoN+μ)σεIoNσεIoNσεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ)|
    =[(σεIoN+μ)(σεSoN(ϱ+ω+μ))(σεIoN)(σεIoN)].

    Because R0<1 is given, so the Det will be positive, that is, Det(J1(E0))>0. Hence, the infection-free steady-state of the recommended system is locally asymptotically stable (LAS) for R0<1 and unstable in other cases.

    Theorem 4.2. For j = 1, the endemic steady-state (E*) of system (3.3) is LAS if R0>1 and is unstable in other circumstances.

    Proof. Let j = 1 and take the Jacobian matrix of system (3.3) at endemic steady-state (E*) as

    J(E)=[(φ+μ)000φ(σεIN+μ)σεIN00σεINσεSN(ϱ+ω+μ)000ϱμ,],

    furthermore, we get

    J(E)=[(φ+μ)000φ(σεWN+μ)σεWN00σεWN(ϱ+ω+μ)000ϱμ,],

    in which W=1(ω+ϱ+μ)[(φγμ+μ)υ(φ+μ)Nμ(ω+ϱ+μ)σε]. The characteristic equation is (φ+μ+λ)(μ+λ)[λ2+(σεWN+μ)λ+σε(ω+ϱ+μ)WN]=0, which implies that λ1=(ϕ+µ) and λ2=µ with the following

    λ2+(σεWN+μ)λ+σε(ω+ϱ+μ)WN=0. (4.4)

    Substituting the value of W into (4.4), we get

    λ2+mλ+n=0, (4.5)

    in which m=Ro((φγμ+μ)υ)(φ+μ)N and n=σε(φγμ+μ)υ(φ+μ)N(ω+ϱ+μ)μ. Hence it is clear that m,n>1, also R0=σεω+ϱ+μ>1. The eigenvalues provided by equation (4.5) are negative according to the Routh-Hurwitz criteria. Thus, whenever R0>1, the EE of the proposed model of tungiasis is locally asymptotically stable.

    In this section of the paper, we utilize fixed point theory to demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of the fractional order model (3.3) solution. The system of equations can be represented in the following way:

    {ABC0Dȷts(t)=U(t,v(t)),v(0)=v0,0<t<T<. (5.1)

    In the above (5.1), v(t)=(P,S,I,T) is the vector form of the state variables and U is a continuous vector function. Moreover, U is given by

    U=(U1U2U3U4)=(γυ(φ+μ)P,(1γ)υ+φP(Γ+μ)S,ΓS(ω+ϱ+μ)I,ϱIμT),

    and v0(t)=(P(0),S(0),I(0),T(0)) are initial conditions. In addition to this, the Lipschitz condition is fulfilled by U as

    U(t,v1(t))U(t,v2(t))Nv1(t)v2(t). (5.2)

    In the upcoming step, the existence and uniqueness of the fractional order dynamical model (3.3) will be proved.

    Theorem 5.1. The solution of fractional order (FO) model of equations (3.3) will be unique if the below mentioned condition satisfies:

    (1ȷ)ABC(ȷ)N+ȷABC(ȷ)Γ(ȷ)TȷmaxN<1. (5.3)

    Proof. In order to demonstrate the desired result, we utilize the Atangana-Beleanu (AB) fractional integral, as defined in (2.3), on system (5.1). This yields a non-linear Volterra integral equation as follows:

    v(t)=v0+1ȷABC(ȷ)U(t,r(t))+ȷABC(ȷ)Γ(ȷ)t0(tκ)ȷ1U(κ,v(κ))dκ. (5.4)

    Take I=(0,T) and the operator Φ:G(I,R4)G(I,R4) defined by

    Φ[v(t)]=v0+1ȷABC(ȷ)U(t,v(t))+ȷABC(ȷ)Γ(ȷ)t0(tκ)ȷ1U(κ,v(κ))dκ. (5.5)

    Equation (5.4) takes the following form

    v(t)=Φ[v(t)], (5.6)

    and the supremum norm on I is indicated by .I and is

    v(t)I=suptIv(t),v(t)G. (5.7)

    Certainly, G(I,R4) with norm .I becomes a Banach space and

    t0F(t,κ)v(κ)dκTF(t,κ)Iv(t)I, (5.8)

    with v(t)G(I,R4), F(t,κ)G(I2,R) in a manner that

    F(t,κ)I=supt,κI|F(t,κ)|. (5.9)

    Here, utilizing the definition of Φ shown in (5.6), we have

    Φ[v1(t)]Φ[v2(t)]I(1ȷ)ABC(ȷ)(U(t,v1(t))U(t,v2(t))+ȷABC(ȷ)Γ(ȷ)×t0(tκ)ȷ1(U(κ,v1(κ))U(κ,v2(κ)))dκI (5.10)

    Additionally, by applying the Lipschitz condition (5.2) and the triangular inequality, in combination with the result in (5.8), we arrive at the below expression after simplification:

    Φ[v1(t)]Φ[v1(t)]I((1ȷ)NABC(ȷ)+ȷABC(ȷ)Γ(ȷ)NTȷmax)v1(t)v2(t)I. (5.11)

    Consequently, we have the following:

    Φ[v1(t)]Φ[v1(t)]IBv1(t)v2(t)I, (5.12)

    in which

    B=(1ȷ)NABC(ȷ)+ȷABC(ȷ)Γ(ȷ)NTȷmax.

    It is evident that when condition (5.3) is met, Φ becomes a contraction, implying that the fractional order dynamical system (5.1) possesses a unique solution.

    In this section, we will present an iterative scheme for the numerical solution of the recommended model (3.3) of the infection. First, an iterative scheme will be developed and then the the solution pathways of the system will be represented through the scheme to understand the dynamics. We use the newly established numerical approach (iterative) proposed for the approximation of the AB integral operator [39]. We briefly describe and apply the aforesaid approach to our dynamical system (3.3) in order to show the impact of different parameters on the infection.

    Here, rewriting system (5.4) of the infection into the fractional integral equation form using the fundamental theorem of fractional calculus:

    s(t)s(0)=(1ȷ)ABC(ȷ)U(t,s(t))+ȷABC(ȷ)×Γ(ȷ)t0U(κ,x(ξ))(tκ)ȷ1dξ. (6.1)

    At t=tξ+1, ξ=0,1,2,..., we have

    s(tξ+1)s(0)=1ȷABC(ȷ)U(tξ,s(tξ))+ȷABC(ȷ)×Γ(ȷ)tξ+10U(κ,s(κ))(tξ+1κ)ȷ1dȷ,=1ȷABC(ȷ)U(tξ,s(tξ))+ȷABC(ȷ)×Γ(ȷ)ξj=0tj+1tjU(κ,s(κ))(tξ+1κ)ȷ1dȷ. (6.2)

    The function U(κ,s(κ)) can be estimated over the interval [tj,tj+1], and we apply the interpolation polynomial

    U(κ,s(κ))U(tj,s(tj))h(ttj1)U(tj1,s(tj1))h(ttj), (6.3)

    then substituting in (6.2), we get

    s(tξ+1)=s(0)+1ȷABC(ȷ)U(tξ,s(tξ))+ȷABC(ȷ)×Γ(ȷ)ξj=0(U(tj,s(tj))htj+1tj(ttj1)(tξ+1t)ȷ1dtU(tj1,s(tj1))htj+1tj(ttj)(tξ+1t)ȷ1dt). (6.4)

    After computing these integrals, the approximate answer is as follows:

    s(tξ+1)=s(t0)+1ȷABC(ȷ)U(tξ,s(tξ))+ȷABC(ȷ)ξj=0(hȷU(tj,s(tj))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ(ξj+2+ȷ)(ξj)ȷ(ξj+2+2ȷ))hȷU(tj1,s(tj1))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ+1(ξj)ȷ(ξj+1+ȷ))). (6.5)

    Finally, for the suggested model, we achieved the following recursive formulae:

    P(tξ+1)=P(t0)+1ȷABC(ȷ)U1(tξ,s(tξ))+ȷABC(ȷ)ξj=0(hȷU1(tj,s(tj))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ(ξj+2+ȷ)(ξj)ȷ(ξj+2+2ȷ))hȷU1(tj1,s(tj1))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ+1(ξj)ȷ(ξj+1+ȷ)))S(tξ+1)=S(t0)+1ȷABC(ȷ)U2(tξ,s(tξ))+ȷABC(ȷ)kj=0(fȷU2(tj,s(tj))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ(ξj+2+ȷ)(ξj)ȷ(ξj+2+2ȷ))hȷU2(tj1,s(tj1))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ+1(ξj)ȷ(ξj+1+ȷ)))I(tξ+1)=I(t0)+1ȷABC(ȷ)U3(tξ,s(tξ))+ȷABC(ȷ)ξj=0(hȷU3(tj,s(tj))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ(ξj+2+ȷ)(ξj)ȷ(ξj+2+2ȷ))hȷU3(tj1,s(tj1))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ+1(ξj)ȷ(ξj+1+ȷ)))T(tξ+1)=T(t0)+1ȷABC(ȷ)U4(tξ,s(tξ))+ȷABC(ȷ)ξj=0(fȷU4(tj,s(tj))Γ(ȷ+2)((ξ+1j)ȷ(ξj+2+ȷ)(ξj)ȷ(ξj+2+2ȷ))fȷU4(tj1,s(tj1))Γ(ȷ+2)((n+1j)ȷ+1(ξj)ȷ(ξj+1+ȷ))). (6.6)
    Figure 1.  Visualization of the tracking path behavior of the suggested model under varying fractional parameter values j, i.e., j = 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8.
    Figure 2.  Illustration of the solution pathways of the suggested model with varying values of the losing rate of protection φ, i.e., φ = 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55.
    Figure 3.  Illustration of the solution pathways of the suggested model with varying values of the treatment rate ρ, i.e., ρ = 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08.
    Figure 4.  Representing the time series of the class of the proposed system of the infection with varying values of the transmission probability σ, i.e., σ = 0.40, 0.50, 0.60, 0.70.
    Figure 5.  Visualization of the tracking path behavior of the suggested model under varying fractional parameter values j, i.e., j = 0.85, 0.90, 0.95, 1.00.

    We will utilize the above alterative approach to investigate the dynamical behaviour of the recommended fractional model of tungiasis. It is well-known that the graphical view analysis of epidemic models provide a comprehensive exploration of the model's behavior, leading to a better understanding of the epidemic's spread and potential control strategies. Here, we will perform different simulations to visualize the impact of different input factors on the system.

    The values of the input parameter and state variables of the system are assumed for numerical purposes. For our investigation, we conducted a series of simulations to analyze the behavior of the system under different conditions. In these simulations, we varied specific parameters and observed their impact on the solution pathways of the system. First, in Figure 1 and Figure 5, we examined the effect of the fractional parameter j on the dynamics of the system. By changing the fractional order, we aimed to understand its role in shaping the infection spread in the society. Notably, we observed that decreasing the fractional parameter led to a reduction in the infection rate within the community. This finding indicates that the fractional parameter can serve as a crucial control parameter for managing the epidemic. In Figure 2, we focused on the losing rate of protection and its influence on the dynamics of the tungiasis infection. The results clearly indicate that this parameter plays a pivotal role in determining the risk of infection within the population. A higher losing rate of protection was found to increase the susceptibility to infection, posing a potential threat to public health.

    The treatment rate was the primary parameter of interest in Figure 3. By varying the treatment rate ρ, we explored its impact on the transmission dynamics of the system. The simulation revealed that the treatment rate significantly affects the control of the infection. Higher values of ρ demonstrated a more effective reduction in infection rates, suggesting its importance in implementing effective intervention strategies. Lastly, Figure 4 focused on understanding the influence of the transmission probability on the tungiasis dynamics. Through this simulation, we visualized how changes in the transmission probability affect the overall dynamics of the infection. The results clearly illustrated that the transmission probability is a critical factor in shaping the infection spread within the community.

    Our numerical analysis provided valuable insights into the control and dynamics of tungiasis. The fractional parameter, losing rate of protection, treatment rate, and transmission probability all emerged as significant factors that influence the infection's behavior. In the realm of tungiasis control and intervention, our discovered insights provide a foundational framework for the formulation of effective strategies aimed at managing and mitigating the spread of the infection within affected populations. It is, however, crucial to acknowledge that the values employed in this analysis were assumptions crafted for numerical expediency and may not faithfully replicate real-world scenarios. Consequently, for heightened precision in predictions and practical implications, an imperative next step involves the meticulous validation and refinement of our model using authentic real-world data. This process is indispensable for aligning our theoretical framework with the intricacies of tangible scenarios and enhancing the applicability of our findings in the context of tungiasis control and management.

    In this study, we formulated an epidemic model for tungiasis disease in the framework of fractional Atangana-Baleanu derivative to conceptualize the transmission route of the infection. The biologically meaningful steady-states of the system are investigated through analytic methods. We determined the basic reproduction number of our fractional model, symbolized by R0. The existence and uniqueness of the model's solution has been demonstrated. We have shown that the infection-free steady-states of the recommended model are locally asymptotically stable if R0<1 and unstable in other cases, while the endemic steady-state is locally asymptotically stable if R0>1 and unstable in other circumstances. A numerical scheme is presented to illustrate the solution pathways of the recommended system of the infection. The dynamical behaviour of the model is presented with the variation of different input parameters. We recommended the most critical factors of the system for the control and subsequent of tungiasis. It is acknowledged that delays play a fundamental role in capturing the temporal dynamics of systems [40]. Incorporating delays into mathematical models enhances their predictive power and allows for a more accurate representation of real-world phenomena [41][43]. In the future work, we will incorporate time delay in the transmission dynamics of the disease to comprehend the dynamics of the disease and provide more accurate information for prevention.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    [1] Fernandes-Alnemri T, Yu J-W, Datta P, et al. (2009) AIM2 activates the inflammasome and cell death in response to cytoplasmic DNA. Nature 458: 509-513. doi: 10.1038/nature07710
    [2] Banjara M, Ghosh C (2017) Sterile Neuroinflammation and Strategies for Therapeutic Intervention. Int J Inflam 2017: 8385961.
    [3] Lyman M, Lloyd DG, Ji X, et al. (2014) Neuroinflammation: the role and consequences. Neurosci Res 79: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.10.004
    [4] Romani M, Rodman TC, Vidali G, et al. (1979) Serological analysis of species specificity in the high mobility group chromosomal proteins. J Biol Chem 254: 2918-2922.
    [5] Prasad S, Thakur M (1989) Distribution of high mobility group proteins in different tissues of rats during aging. Biochem Int 20: 687-695.
    [6] Čabart P, Kalousek I, Jandová D, et al. (1995) Differential expression of nuclear HMG1, HMG2 proteins and H10 histone in various blood cells. Cell Biochem Funct 13: 125-133. doi: 10.1002/cbf.290130209
    [7] Seyedin SM, Pehrson JR, Cole RD (1981) Loss of chromosomal high mobility group proteins HMG1 and HMG2 when mouse neuroblastoma and Friend erythroleukemia cells become committed to differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78: 5988-5992. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.5988
    [8] Muller S, Ronfani L, Bianchi ME (2004) Regulated expression and subcellular localization of HMGB1, a chromatin protein with a cytokine function. J Intern Med 255: 332-343. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2003.01296.x
    [9] Kitahara T, Takeishi Y, Harada M, et al. (2008) High-mobility group box 1 restores cardiac function after myocardial infarction in transgenic mice. Cardiovasc Res 80: 40-46. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn163
    [10] Kang R, Zhang Q, Hou W, et al. (2014) Intracellular Hmgb1 inhibits inflammatory nucleosome release and limits acute pancreatitis in mice. Gastroenterology 146: 1097-1107. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.015
    [11] Huang H, Nace GW, McDonald K-A, et al. (2014) Hepatocyte specific HMGB1 deletion worsens the injury in liver ischemia/reperfusion: A role for intracellular HMGB1 in cellular protection. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 59: 1984. doi: 10.1002/hep.26976
    [12] Yanai H, Matsuda A, An J, et al. (2013) Conditional ablation of HMGB1 in mice reveals its protective function against endotoxemia and bacterial infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 20699-20704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320808110
    [13] Huebener P, Gwak G-Y, Pradere J-P, et al. (2014) High-mobility group box 1 is dispensable for autophagy, mitochondrial quality control, and organ function in vivo. Cell Metab 19: 539-547. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.01.014
    [14] Chirico V, Lacquaniti A, Salpietro V, et al. (2014) High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in childhood: from bench to bedside. Eur J Pediatr 173: 1123-1136. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2327-1
    [15] Wang K-C, Tsai C-P, Lee C-L, et al. (2012) Elevated plasma high-mobility group box 1 protein is a potential marker for neuromyelitis optica. Neuroscience 226: 510-516. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.041
    [16] Wang H, Wang K, Wang C, et al. (2013) Cerebrospinal fluid high-mobility group box protein 1 in neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis. Neuroimmunomodulation 20: 113-118. doi: 10.1159/000345994
    [17] Kobori N, Clifton GL, Dash P (2002) Altered expression of novel genes in the cerebral cortex following experimental brain injury. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 104: 148-158. doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(02)00331-5
    [18] Agnello D, Wang H, Yang H, et al. (2002) HMGB-1, a DNA-binding protein with cytokine activity, induces brain TNF and IL-6 production, and mediates anorexia and taste aversion. Cytokine 18: 231-236. doi: 10.1006/cyto.2002.0890
    [19] Antoine DJ, Harris HE, Andersson U, et al. (2014) A systematic nomenclature for the redox states of high mobility group box (HMGB) proteins. Mol Med 20: 135-137.
    [20] Kang R, Chen R, Zhang Q, et al. (2014) HMGB1 in health and disease. Mol Aspects Med 40: 1-116. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2014.05.001
    [21] Andersson U, Antoine DJ, Tracey KJ (2014) The functions of HMGB1 depend on molecular localization and post-translational modifications. J Intern Med 276: 420-424. doi: 10.1111/joim.12309
    [22] Su Z, Ni P, She P, et al. (2016) Bio-HMGB1 from breast cancer contributes to M-MDSC differentiation from bone marrow progenitor cells and facilitates conversion of monocytes into MDSC-like cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 66: 391-401.
    [23] Thomas JO, Stott K (2012) H1 and HMGB1: modulators of chromatin structure. Biochem Soc Trans 40: 341-346. doi: 10.1042/BST20120014
    [24] Cato L, Stott K, Watson M, et al. (2008) The interaction of HMGB1 and linker histones occurs through their acidic and basic tails. J Mol Biol 384: 1262-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.001
    [25] Holdenrieder S, Stieber P (2009) Clinical use of circulating nucleosomes. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 46: 1-24. doi: 10.1080/10408360802485875
    [26] Assenberg R, Webb M, Connolly E, et al. (2008) A critical role in structure-specific DNA binding for the acetylatable lysine residues in HMGB1. Biochem J 411: 553-561. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071613
    [27] Little AJ, Corbett E, Ortega F, et al. (2013) Cooperative recruitment of HMGB1 during V (D) J recombination through interactions with RAG1 and DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 3289-3301. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1461
    [28] Das D, Scovell WM (2001) The binding interaction of HMG-1 with the TATA-binding protein/TATA complex. J Biol Chem 276: 32597-32605. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M011792200
    [29] Naghavi MH, Nowak P, Andersson J, et al. (2003) Intracellular high mobility group B1 protein (HMGB1) represses HIV-1 LTR-directed transcription in a promoter-and cell-specific manner. Virology 314: 179-189. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00453-7
    [30] Ellwood KB, Yen Y-M, Johnson RC, et al. (2000) Mechanism for specificity by HMG-1 in enhanceosome assembly. Mol Cell Biol 20: 4359-4370. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.12.4359-4370.2000
    [31] Mitsouras K, Wong B, Arayata C, et al. (2002) The DNA architectural protein HMGB1 displays two distinct modes of action that promote enhanceosome assembly. Mol Cell Biol 22: 4390-4401. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.12.4390-4401.2002
    [32] Yuan F, Gu L, Guo S, et al. (2004) Evidence for involvement of HMGB1 protein in human DNA mismatch repair. J Biol Chem 279: 20935-20940. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401931200
    [33] Robertson AB, Klungland A, Rognes T, et al. (2009) DNA repair in mammalian cells: Base excision repair: the long and short of it. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 981-993. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-8736-z
    [34] Prasad R, Liu Y, Deterding LJ, et al. (2007) HMGB1 is a cofactor in mammalian base excision repair. Mol Cell 27: 829-841. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.029
    [35] Giavara S, Kosmidou E, Hande MP, et al. (2005) Yeast Nhp6A/B and mammalian Hmgb1 facilitate the maintenance of genome stability. Curr Biol 15: 68-72.
    [36] Zayed H, Izsvák Z, Khare D, et al. (2003) The DNA‐bending protein HMGB1 is a cellular cofactor of Sleeping Beauty transposition. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 2313-2322. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg341
    [37] de Silva S, Lotta LT, Jr., Burris CA, et al. (2010) Virion-associated cofactor high-mobility group DNA-binding protein-1 facilitates transposition from the herpes simplex virus/Sleeping Beauty amplicon vector platform. Hum Gene Ther 21: 1615-1622. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.022
    [38] Shen Y, Peng H, Pan S, et al. (2010) Interaction of DNA/nuclear protein/polycation and the terplexes for gene delivery. Nanotechnology 21: 045102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/4/045102
    [39] Siu YS, Li L, Leung MF, et al. (2012) Polyethylenimine-based amphiphilic core-shell nanoparticles: study of gene delivery and intracellular trafficking. Biointerphases 7: 16. doi: 10.1007/s13758-011-0016-4
    [40] Yi WJ, Yang J, Li C, et al. (2012) Enhanced nuclear import and transfection efficiency of TAT peptide-based gene delivery systems modified by additional nuclear localization signals. Bioconjug Chem 23: 125-134. doi: 10.1021/bc2005472
    [41] Weber MD, Frank MG, Tracey KJ, et al. (2015) Stress induces the danger-associated molecular pattern HMGB-1 in the hippocampus of male Sprague Dawley rats: a priming stimulus of microglia and the NLRP3 inflammasome. J Neurosci 35: 316-324. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3561-14.2015
    [42] Tang D, Kang R, Livesey KM, et al. (2010) Endogenous HMGB1 regulates autophagy. J Cell Biol 190: 881-892. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200911078
    [43] Lee H, Shin N, Song M, et al. (2010) Analysis of nuclear high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)-binding proteins in colon cancer cells: clustering with proteins involved in secretion and extranuclear function. J Proteome Res 9: 4661-4670. doi: 10.1021/pr100386r
    [44] Dintilhac A, Bernues J (2002) HMGB1 interacts with many apparently unrelated proteins by recognizing short amino acid sequences. J Biol Chem 277: 7021-7028. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108417200
    [45] Kang R, Livesey KM, Zeh HJ, 3rd, et al. (2011) Metabolic regulation by HMGB1-mediated autophagy and mitophagy. Autophagy 7: 1256-1258. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.10.16753
    [46] Tang D, Billiar TR, Lotze MT (2012) A Janus tale of two active high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) redox states. Mol Med 18: 1360-1362.
    [47] Fang WH, Yao YM, Shi ZG, et al. (2002) The significance of changes in high mobility group-1 protein mRNA expression in rats after thermal injury. Shock 17: 329-333. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200204000-00016
    [48] Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M, et al. (1999) HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science 285: 248-251. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5425.248
    [49] Wang H, Vishnubhakat JM, Bloom O, et al. (1999) Proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 1) stimulate release of high mobility group protein-1 by pituicytes. Surgery 126: 389-392. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70182-0
    [50] Andersson U, Wang H, Palmblad K, et al. (2000) High mobility group 1 protein (HMG-1) stimulates proinflammatory cytokine synthesis in human monocytes. J Exp Med 192: 565-570. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.4.565
    [51] Yang H, Wang H, Tracey KJ (2001) HMG-1 rediscovered as a cytokine. Shock 15: 247-253. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200115040-00001
    [52] Alexander HR, Doherty GM, Venzon DJ, et al. (1992) Recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra): effective therapy against gram-negative sepsis in rats. Surgery 112: 188-193; discussion 193-184.
    [53] Libert C, Vink A, Coulie P, et al. (1992) Limited involvement of interleukin‐6 in the pathogenesis of lethal septic shock as revealed by the effect of monoclonal antibodies against interleukin‐6 or its receptor in various murine models. Eur J Immunol 22: 2625-2630. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830221023
    [54] Abraham E, Arcaroli J, Carmody A, et al. (2000) Cutting edge: HMG-1 as a mediator of acute lung inflammation. J Immunol 165: 2950-2954. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.6.2950
    [55] Wagner R, Myers RR (1996) Endoneurial injection of TNF-alpha produces neuropathic pain behaviors. Neuroreport 7: 2897-2901. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199611250-00018
    [56] Eliav E, Herzberg U, Ruda MA, et al. (1999) Neuropathic pain from an experimental neuritis of the rat sciatic nerve. Pain 83: 169-182. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00102-5
    [57] Chacur M, Milligan ED, Gazda LS, et al. (2001) A new model of sciatic inflammatory neuritis (SIN): induction of unilateral and bilateral mechanical allodynia following acute unilateral peri-sciatic immune activation in rats. Pain 94: 231-244. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00354-2
    [58] Shimommura Y, Shimizu H, Takahashi M, et al. (1990) Effects of peripheral administration of recombinant human interleukin-1 beta on feeding behavior of the rat. Life Sci 47: 2185-2192. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90148-K
    [59] Crestani F, Seguy F, Dantzer R (1991) Behavioural effects of peripherally injected interleukin-1: role of prostaglandins. Brain Res 542: 330-335. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91587-Q
    [60] Dunn AJ, Antoon M, Chapman Y (1991) Reduction of exploratory behavior by intraperitoneal injection of interleukin-1 involves brain corticotropin-releasing factor. Brain Res Bull 26: 539-542. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(91)90092-X
    [61] Kluger MJ (1991) Fever: role of pyrogens and cryogens. Physiol Rev 71: 93-127.
    [62] Oka T, Aou S, Hori T (1993) Intracerebroventricular injection of interleukin-1β induces hyperalgesia in rats. Brain Res 624: 61-68. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90060-Z
    [63] Bluthe R-M, Michaud B, Kelley KW, et al. (1996) Vagotomy attenuates behavioural effects of interleukin-1 injected peripherally but not centrally. Neuroreport 7: 1485-1488. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199606170-00008
    [64] Reeve AJ, Patel S, Fox A, et al. (2000) Intrathecally administered endotoxin or cytokines produce allodynia, hyperalgesia and changes in spinal cord neuronal responses to nociceptive stimuli in the rat. Eur J Pain 4: 247-257. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2000.0177
    [65] Yirmiya R (1996) Endotoxin produces a depressive-like episode in rats. Brain Res 711: 163-174. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01415-2
    [66] Coelho A, Fioramonti J, Bueno L (2000) Brain interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha are involved in lipopolysaccharide-induced delayed rectal allodynia in awake rats. Brain Res Bull 52: 223-228. doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00269-0
    [67] Turrin NP, Gayle D, Ilyin SE, et al. (2001) Pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine mRNA induction in the periphery and brain following intraperitoneal administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Brain Res Bull 54: 443-453. doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00445-2
    [68] Gabellec M-M, Griffais R, Fillion G, et al. (1995) Expression of interleukin 1α, interleukin 1β and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist mRNA in mouse brain: regulation by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment. Mol Brain Res 31: 122-130. doi: 10.1016/0169-328X(95)00042-Q
    [69] Laye S, Gheusi G, Cremona S, et al. (2000) Endogenous brain IL-1 mediates LPS-induced anorexia and hypothalamic cytokine expression. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279: R93-98.
    [70] Bluthe RM, Dantzer R, Kelley KW (1997) Central mediation of the effects of interleukin-1 on social exploration and body weight in mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 22: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(96)00042-X
    [71] Rothwell NJ (1988) Central effects of TNFα on thermogenesis and fever in the rat. Biosci Rep 8: 345-352. doi: 10.1007/BF01115225
    [72] Dascombe MJ, Rothwell NJ, Sagay BO, et al. (1989) Pyrogenic and thermogenic effects of interleukin 1 beta in the rat. Am J Physiol 256: E7-11.
    [73] Walter JS, Meyers P, Krueger JM (1989) Microinjection of interleukin-1 into brain: separation of sleep and fever responses. Physiol Behav 45: 169-176. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(89)90181-9
    [74] O'Connor KA, Hansen MK, Pugh CR, et al. (2003) Further characterization of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) as a proinflammatory cytokine: central nervous system effects. Cytokine 24: 254-265. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2003.08.001
    [75] Fiebich BL, Schleicher S, Spleiss O, et al. (2001) Mechanisms of prostaglandin E2-induced interleukin-6 release in astrocytes: possible involvement of EP4-like receptors, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and protein kinase C. J Neurochem 79: 950-958.
    [76] Newton R, Kuitert LM, Bergmann M, et al. (1997) Evidence for involvement of NF-kappaB in the transcriptional control of COX-2 gene expression by IL-1beta. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237: 28-32. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7064
    [77] Hori O, Brett J, Slattery T, et al. (1995) The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cellular binding site for amphoterin mediation of neurite outgrowth and co-expression of rage and amphoterin in the developing nervous system. J Biol Chem 270: 25752-25761. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25752
    [78] Fiuza C, Bustin M, Talwar S, et al. (2003) Inflammation-promoting activity of HMGB1 on human microvascular endothelial cells. Blood 101: 2652-2660. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1300
    [79] Park JS, Arcaroli J, Yum HK, et al. (2003) Activation of gene expression in human neutrophils by high mobility group box 1 protein. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 284: C870-879. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00322.2002
    [80] Chen GY, Tang J, Zheng P, et al. (2009) CD24 and Siglec-10 selectively repress tissue damage-induced immune responses. Science 323: 1722-1725. doi: 10.1126/science.1168988
    [81] Tian J, Avalos AM, Mao S-Y, et al. (2007) Toll-like receptor 9–dependent activation by DNA-containing immune complexes is mediated by HMGB1 and RAGE. Nat Immunol 8: 487-496. doi: 10.1038/ni1457
    [82] Gao H-M, Zhou H, Zhang F, et al. (2011) HMGB1 acts on microglia Mac1 to mediate chronic neuroinflammation that drives progressive neurodegeneration. J Neurosci 31: 1081-1092. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3732-10.2011
    [83] Fu GX, Chen AF, Zhong Y, et al. (2016) Decreased serum level of HMGB1 and MyD88 during human aging progress in healthy individuals. Aging Clin Exp Res 28: 175-180. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0402-8
    [84] Tang AH, Brunn GJ, Cascalho M, et al. (2007) Pivotal advance: endogenous pathway to SIRS, sepsis, and related conditions. J Leukoc Biol 82: 282-285. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1206752
    [85] Park JS, Gamboni-Robertson F, He Q, et al. (2006) High mobility group box 1 protein interacts with multiple Toll-like receptors. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C917-924.
    [86] Imai Y, Kuba K, Neely GG, et al. (2008) Identification of oxidative stress and Toll-like receptor 4 signaling as a key pathway of acute lung injury. Cell 133: 235-249. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.043
    [87] Salminen A, Ojala J, Kaarniranta K, et al. (2012) Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress activate inflammasomes: impact on the aging process and age-related diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 69: 2999-3013. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0962-0
    [88] Morinaga Y, Yanagihara K, Nakamura S, et al. (2010) Legionella pneumophila induces cathepsin B-dependent necrotic cell death with releasing high mobility group box1 in macrophages. Respir Res 11: 158. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-158
    [89] Rauvala H, Pihlaskari R (1987) Isolation and some characteristics of an adhesive factor of brain that enhances neurite outgrowth in central neurons. J Biol Chem 262: 16625-16635.
    [90] Guazzi S, Strangio A, Franzi AT, et al. (2003) HMGB1, an architectural chromatin protein and extracellular signalling factor, has a spatially and temporally restricted expression pattern in mouse brain. Gene Expr Patterns 3: 29-33. doi: 10.1016/S1567-133X(02)00093-5
    [91] Enokido Y, Yoshitake A, Ito H, et al. (2008) Age-dependent change of HMGB1 and DNA double-strand break accumulation in mouse brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 376: 128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.08.108
    [92] Fang P, Schachner M, Shen YQ (2012) HMGB1 in development and diseases of the central nervous system. Mol Neurobiol 45: 499-506. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8264-y
    [93] Fonken LK, Frank MG, Kitt MM, et al. (2016) The Alarmin HMGB1 Mediates Age-Induced Neuroinflammatory Priming. J Neurosci 36: 7946-7956. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1161-16.2016
    [94] O'Donovan MC (1993) A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. Cell 72: 971-983. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-E
    [95] Hodges A, Strand AD, Aragaki AK, et al. (2006) Regional and cellular gene expression changes in human Huntington's disease brain. Hum Mol Genet 15: 965-977. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl013
    [96] Crotti A, Benner C, Kerman BE, et al. (2014) Mutant Huntingtin promotes autonomous microglia activation via myeloid lineage-determining factors. Nat Neurosci 17: 513-521. doi: 10.1038/nn.3668
    [97] Crotti A, Glass CK (2015) The choreography of neuroinflammation in Huntington's disease. Trends Immunol 36: 364-373. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.04.007
    [98] Min HJ, Ko EA, Wu J, et al. (2013) Chaperone-like activity of high-mobility group box 1 protein and its role in reducing the formation of polyglutamine aggregates. J Immunol 190: 1797-1806. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202472
    [99] Qi M-L, Tagawa K, Enokido Y, et al. (2007) Proteome analysis of soluble nuclear proteins reveals that HMGB1/2 suppress genotoxic stress in polyglutamine diseases. Nat Cell Biol 9: 402-414. doi: 10.1038/ncb1553
    [100] Goula AV, Berquist BR, Wilson DM, 3rd, et al. (2009) Stoichiometry of base excision repair proteins correlates with increased somatic CAG instability in striatum over cerebellum in Huntington's disease transgenic mice. PLoS Genet 5: e1000749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000749
    [101] Liu Y, Prasad R, Beard WA, et al. (2009) Coordination between polymerase β and FEN1 can modulate CAG repeat expansion. J Biol Chem 284: 28352-28366. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.050286
    [102] McAlpine FE, Lee JK, Harms AS, et al. (2009) Inhibition of soluble TNF signaling in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease prevents pre-plaque amyloid-associated neuropathology. Neurobiol Dis 34: 163-177. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.01.006
    [103] Frank-Cannon TC, Alto LT, McAlpine FE, et al. (2009) Does neuroinflammation fan the flame in neurodegenerative diseases? Mol Neurodegener 4: 47. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-4-47
    [104] Akiyama H, Arai T, Kondo H, et al. (2000) Cell mediators of inflammation in the Alzheimer disease brain. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 14 Suppl 1: S47-53.
    [105] Buchanan MM, Hutchinson M, Watkins LR, et al. (2010) Toll-like receptor 4 in CNS pathologies. J Neurochem 114: 13-27.
    [106] Du Yan S, Chen X, Fu J, et al. (1996) RAGE and amyloid-β peptide neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease. Nature 382: 685-691. doi: 10.1038/382685a0
    [107] Mazarati A, Maroso M, Iori V, et al. (2011) High-mobility group box-1 impairs memory in mice through both toll-like receptor 4 and receptor for advanced glycation end products. Exp Neurol 232: 143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.08.012
    [108] Takata K, Kitamura Y, Kakimura J, et al. (2003) Role of high mobility group protein-1 (HMG1) in amyloid-beta homeostasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 301: 699-703. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00024-X
    [109] Takata K, Takada T, Ito A, et al. (2012) Microglial Amyloid-beta1-40 Phagocytosis Dysfunction Is Caused by High-Mobility Group Box Protein-1: Implications for the Pathological Progression of Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2012: 685739.
    [110] Richard SA, Wu M, Lin D (2014) Traumatic Subdural Effusion Evolving into Chronic Subdural Hematoma. Open J Mod Neurosurg 5: 12.
    [111] Woodcock T, Morganti-Kossmann MC (2013) The role of markers of inflammation in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol 4: 18.
    [112] Laird MD, Shields JS, Sukumari-Ramesh S, et al. (2014) High mobility group box protein-1 promotes cerebral edema after traumatic brain injury via activation of toll-like receptor 4. Glia 62: 26-38. doi: 10.1002/glia.22581
    [113] Richard SA, Min W, Su Z, et al. (2017) High Mobility Group Box 1 and Traumatic Brain Injury. J Behav Brain Sci 7: 50. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2017.72006
    [114] Su X, Wang H, Zhao J, et al. (2011) Beneficial effects of ethyl pyruvate through inhibiting high-mobility group box 1 expression and TLR4/NF-B pathway after traumatic brain injury in the rat. Mediators Inflamm 2011.
    [115] Wang K-Y, Yu G-F, Zhang Z-Y, et al. (2012) Plasma high-mobility group box 1 levels and prediction of outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. Clin Chim Acta 413: 1737-1741. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.07.002
    [116] Au AK, Aneja RK, Bell MJ, et al. (2012) Cerebrospinal fluid levels of high-mobility group box 1 and cytochrome C predict outcome after pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29: 2013-2021. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2171
    [117] Carty M, Bowie AG (2011) Evaluating the role of Toll-like receptors in diseases of the central nervous system. Biochem Pharmacol 81: 825-837. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.01.003
    [118] Ding Q, Keller JN (2005) Evaluation of rage isoforms, ligands, and signaling in the brain. Biochim Biophys Acta 1746: 18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.08.006
    [119] Okuma Y, Liu K, Wake H, et al. (2012) Anti–high mobility group box‐1 antibody therapy for traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol 72: 373-384. doi: 10.1002/ana.23602
    [120] Litvan I, Halliday G, Hallett M, et al. (2007) The etiopathogenesis of Parkinson disease and suggestions for future research. Part I. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 66: 251-257. doi: 10.1097/nen.0b013e3180415e42
    [121] Gerhard A, Pavese N, Hotton G, et al. (2006) In vivo imaging of microglial activation with [11 C](R)-PK11195 PET in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis 21: 404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.08.002
    [122] Lindersson EK, Hojrup P, Gai WP, et al. (2004) alpha-Synuclein filaments bind the transcriptional regulator HMGB-1. Neuroreport 15: 2735-2739.
    [123] Song J-X, Lu J-H, Liu L-F, et al. (2014) HMGB1 is involved in autophagy inhibition caused by SNCA/α-synuclein overexpression: a process modulated by the natural autophagy inducer corynoxine B. Autophagy 10: 144-154. doi: 10.4161/auto.26751
    [124] Zhang J, Niu N, Wang M, et al. (2013) Neuron-derived IgG protects dopaminergic neurons from insult by 6-OHDA and activates microglia through the FcγR I and TLR4 pathways. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45: 1911-1920. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.06.005
    [125] Santoro M, Maetzler W, Stathakos P, et al. (2016) In-vivo evidence that high mobility group box 1 exerts deleterious effects in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydropyridine model and Parkinson's disease which can be attenuated by glycyrrhizin. Neurobiol Dis 91: 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.02.018
    [126] Sasaki T, Liu K, Agari T, et al. (2016) Anti-high mobility group box 1 antibody exerts neuroprotection in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol 275 Pt 1: 220-231.
    [127] Furuya N, Yu J, Byfield M, et al. (2005) The evolutionarily conserved domain of Beclin 1 is required for Vps34 binding, autophagy, and tumor suppressor function. Autophagy 1: 46-52. doi: 10.4161/auto.1.1.1542
    [128] Funderburk SF, Wang QJ, Yue Z (2010) The Beclin 1–VPS34 complex–at the crossroads of autophagy and beyond. Trends Cell Biol 20: 355-362. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.002
    [129] Kang R, Livesey KM, Zeh HJ, et al. (2010) HMGB1: a novel Beclin 1-binding protein active in autophagy. Autophagy 6: 1209-1211. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.8.13651
    [130] Huang J, Yang J, Shen Y, et al. (2017) HMGB1 Mediates Autophagy Dysfunction via Perturbing Beclin1-Vps34 Complex in Dopaminergic Cell Model. Front Mol Neurosci 10: 13.
    [131] Constantinescu CS, Farooqi N, O'brien K, et al. (2011) Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS). Brit J Pharmacol 164: 1079-1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01302.x
    [132] McFarland HF, Martin R (2007) Multiple sclerosis: a complicated picture of autoimmunity. Nat Immunol 8: 913-919. doi: 10.1038/ni1507
    [133] Andersson Å, Covacu R, Sunnemark D, et al. (2008) Pivotal advance: HMGB1 expression in active lesions of human and experimental multiple sclerosis. J Leukoc Biol 84: 1248-1255. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1207844
    [134] Sternberg Z, Sternberg D, Chichelli T, et al. (2016) High-mobility group box 1 in multiple sclerosis. Immunol Res 64: 385-391. doi: 10.1007/s12026-015-8673-x
    [135] Leech S, Kirk J, Plumb J, et al. (2007) Persistent endothelial abnormalities and blood-brain barrier leak in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 33: 86-98.
    [136] Šestan N (2012) The emerging biology of autism spectrum disorders. Science 337: 1301-1303. doi: 10.1126/science.1224989
    [137] Madore C, Leyrolle Q, Lacabanne C, et al. (2016) Neuroinflammation in Autism: Plausible Role of Maternal Inflammation, Dietary Omega 3, and Microbiota. Neural Plast 2016: 3597209.
    [138] Voineagu I, Wang X, Johnston P, et al. (2011) Transcriptomic analysis of autistic brain reveals convergent molecular pathology. Nature 474: 380-384. doi: 10.1038/nature10110
    [139] Odell D, Maciulis A, Cutler A, et al. (2005) Confirmation of the association of the C4B null allelle in autism. Hum Immunol 66: 140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2004.11.002
    [140] Oddi D, Crusio WE, D'Amato FR, et al. (2013) Monogenic mouse models of social dysfunction: implications for autism. Behav Brain Res 251: 75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.01.002
    [141] Shcheglovitov A, Shcheglovitova O, Yazawa M, et al. (2013) SHANK3 and IGF1 restore synaptic deficits in neurons from 22q13 deletion syndrome patients. Nature 503: 267-271.
    [142] Emanuele E, Boso M, Brondino N, et al. (2010) Increased serum levels of high mobility group box 1 protein in patients with autistic disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 34: 681-683. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.03.020
    [143] Junaid MA, Kowal D, Barua M, et al. (2004) Proteomic studies identified a single nucleotide polymorphism in glyoxalase I as autism susceptibility factor. Am J Med Genet A 131: 11-17.
    [144] Enstrom AM, Onore CE, Van de Water JA, et al. (2010) Differential monocyte responses to TLR ligands in children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav Immun 24: 64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.08.001
    [145] Barua M, Jenkins EC, Chen W, et al. (2011) Glyoxalase I polymorphism rs2736654 causing the Ala111Glu substitution modulates enzyme activity--implications for autism. Autism Res 4: 262-270. doi: 10.1002/aur.197
    [146] Henkel JS, Engelhardt JI, Siklos L, et al. (2004) Presence of dendritic cells, MCP-1, and activated microglia/macrophages in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord tissue. Ann Neurol 55: 221-235. doi: 10.1002/ana.10805
    [147] Weydt P, Yuen EC, Ransom BR, et al. (2004) Increased cytotoxic potential of microglia from ALS-transgenic mice. Glia 48: 179-182. doi: 10.1002/glia.20062
    [148] Casula M, Iyer AM, Spliet WG, et al. (2011) Toll-like receptor signaling in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord tissue. Neuroscience 179: 233-243. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.02.001
    [149] Lo Coco D, Veglianese P, Allievi E, et al. (2007) Distribution and cellular localization of high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) in the spinal cord of a transgenic mouse model of ALS. Neurosci Lett 412: 73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.063
    [150] Hwang C-S, Liu G-T, Chang MD-T, et al. (2013) Elevated serum autoantibody against high mobility group box 1 as a potent surrogate biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis 58: 13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.04.013
    [151] Costa GMF, Leite CMdA (2015) Trigeminal neuralgia: peripheral and central mechanisms. Revista Dor 16: 297-301.
    [152] Julius D, Basbaum AI (2001) Molecular mechanisms of nociception. Nature 413: 203-210. doi: 10.1038/35093019
    [153] Austin PJ, Moalem-Taylor G (2010) The neuro-immune balance in neuropathic pain: involvement of inflammatory immune cells, immune-like glial cells and cytokines. J Neuroimmunol 229: 26-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.08.013
    [154] Karatas H, Erdener SE, Gursoy-Ozdemir Y, et al. (2013) Spreading depression triggers headache by activating neuronal Panx1 channels. Science 339: 1092-1095. doi: 10.1126/science.1231897
    [155] Kunkler PE, Hulse RE, Kraig RP (2004) Multiplexed cytokine protein expression profiles from spreading depression in hippocampal organotypic cultures. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 24: 829-839.
    [156] Jander S, Schroeter M, Peters O, et al. (2001) Cortical spreading depression induces proinflammatory cytokine gene expression in the rat brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 21: 218-225.
    [157] Lana-Peixoto MA (2008) Devic's neuromyelitis optica: a critical review. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 66: 120-138. doi: 10.1590/S0004-282X2008000100034
    [158] Correale J, Fiol M (2004) Activation of humoral immunity and eosinophils in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 63: 2363-2370. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000148481.80152.BF
    [159] Ishizu T, Osoegawa M, Mei FJ, et al. (2005) Intrathecal activation of the IL-17/IL-8 axis in opticospinal multiple sclerosis. Brain 128: 988-1002. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh453
    [160] Uzawa A, Mori M, Masuda S, et al. (2013) CSF high-mobility group box 1 is associated with intrathecal inflammation and astrocytic damage in neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84: 517-522. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304039
    [161] Solmi M, Veronese N, Favaro A, et al. (2015) Inflammatory cytokines and anorexia nervosa: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Psychoneuroendocrinology 51: 237-252. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.09.031
    [162] Sadagurski M, Norquay L, Farhang J, et al. (2010) Human IL6 enhances leptin action in mice. Diabetologia 53: 525-535. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1580-8
    [163] Senaris RM, Trujillo ML, Navia B, et al. (2011) Interleukin-6 regulates the expression of hypothalamic neuropeptides involved in body weight in a gender-dependent way. J Neuroendocrinol 23: 675-686. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02158.x
    [164] Inui A (2001) Eating behavior in anorexia nervosa--an excess of both orexigenic and anorexigenic signalling? Mol Psychiatry 6: 620. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000944
    [165] Scheede-Bergdahl C, Watt HL, Trutschnigg B, et al. (2012) Is IL-6 the best pro-inflammatory biomarker of clinical outcomes of cancer cachexia? Clin Nutr 31: 85-88. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.07.010
    [166] Solmi M, Santonastaso P, Caccaro R, et al. (2013) A case of anorexia nervosa with comorbid Crohn's disease: beneficial effects of anti-TNF-alpha therapy? Int J Eat Disord 46: 639-641. doi: 10.1002/eat.22153
    [167] Hargrave SL, Kinzig KP (2012) Repeated gastric distension alters food intake and neuroendocrine profiles in rats. Physiol Behav 105: 975-981. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.11.006
    [168] Sedlackova D, Kopeckova J, Papezova H, et al. (2011) Changes of plasma obestatin, ghrelin and NPY in anorexia and bulimia nervosa patients before and after a high-carbohydrate breakfast. Physiol Res 60: 165.
    [169] Cuntz U, Enck P, Frühauf E, et al. (2013) Cholecystokinin revisited: CCK and the hunger trap in anorexia nervosa. PloS One 8: e54457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054457
    [170] Terra X, Auguet T, Aguera Z, et al. (2013) Adipocytokine levels in women with anorexia nervosa. Relationship with weight restoration and disease duration. Int J Eat Disord 46: 855-861.
    [171] Hughes EK, Goldschmidt AB, Labuschagne Z, et al. (2013) Eating disorders with and without comorbid depression and anxiety: similarities and differences in a clinical sample of children and adolescents. Eur Eat Disord Rev 21: 386-394. doi: 10.1002/erv.2234
    [172] Yasuhara D, Hashiguchi T, Kawahara K, et al. (2007) High mobility group box 1 and refeeding-resistance in anorexia nervosa. Mol Psychiatry 12: 976-977. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002050
    [173] Vezzani A (2014) Epilepsy and inflammation in the brain: overview and pathophysiology. Epilepsy Curr 14: 3-7. doi: 10.5698/1535-7511-14.s2.3
    [174] Gorter JA, van Vliet EA, Aronica E, et al. (2006) Potential new antiepileptogenic targets indicated by microarray analysis in a rat model for temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci 26: 11083-11110. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2766-06.2006
    [175] Ravizza T, Vezzani A (2006) Status epilepticus induces time-dependent neuronal and astrocytic expression of interleukin-1 receptor type I in the rat limbic system. Neuroscience 137: 301-308. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.063
    [176] Turrin NP, Rivest S (2004) Innate immune reaction in response to seizures: implications for the neuropathology associated with epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis 16: 321-334. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.03.010
    [177] Vezzani A, French J, Bartfai T, et al. (2011) The role of inflammation in epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol 7: 31-40. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.178
    [178] Maroso M, Balosso S, Ravizza T, et al. (2010) Toll-like receptor 4 and high-mobility group box-1 are involved in ictogenesis and can be targeted to reduce seizures. Nat Med 16: 413-419. doi: 10.1038/nm.2127
    [179] Liang Y, Lei Z, Zhang H, et al. (2014) Toll-like receptor 4 is associated with seizures following ischemia with hyperglycemia. Brain Res 1590: 75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.020
    [180] Allan SM, Tyrrell PJ, Rothwell NJ (2005) Interleukin-1 and neuronal injury. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 629-640. doi: 10.1038/nri1664
    [181] Van Vliet E, da Costa Araujo S, Redeker S, et al. (2007) Blood–brain barrier leakage may lead to progression of temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 130: 521-534. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl318
    [182] Oby E, Janigro D (2006) The blood–brain barrier and epilepsy. Epilepsia 47: 1761-1774. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00817.x
    [183] Choi J, Min HJ, Shin JS (2011) Increased levels of HMGB1 and pro-inflammatory cytokines in children with febrile seizures. J Neuroinflammation 8: 135. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-135
    [184] Kleen JK, Holmes GL (2010) Taming TLR4 may ease seizures. Nat Med 16: 369-370. doi: 10.1038/nm0410-369
    [185] Balosso S, Liu J, Bianchi ME, et al. (2014) Disulfide-containing high mobility group box-1 promotes N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function and excitotoxicity by activating Toll-like receptor 4-dependent signaling in hippocampal neurons. Antioxid Redox Signal 21: 1726-1740. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5349
    [186] Iori V, Maroso M, Rizzi M, et al. (2013) Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts is upregulated in temporal lobe epilepsy and contributes to experimental seizures. Neurobiol Dis 58: 102-114. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.03.006
    [187] Maroso M, Balosso S, Ravizza T, et al. (2011) Interleukin-1 type 1 receptor/Toll-like receptor signalling in epilepsy: the importance of IL-1beta and high-mobility group box 1. J Intern Med 270: 319-326. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02431.x
    [188] Vezzani A, Maroso M, Balosso S, et al. (2011) IL-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor signaling in infection, inflammation, stress and neurodegeneration couples hyperexcitability and seizures. Brain Behav Immun 25: 1281-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.03.018
    [189] Zurolo E, Iyer A, Maroso M, et al. (2011) Activation of Toll-like receptor, RAGE and HMGB1 signalling in malformations of cortical development. Brain 134: 1015-1032. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr032
    [190] Gelderblom M, Sobey CG, Kleinschnitz C, et al. (2015) Danger signals in stroke. Ageing Res Rev 24: 77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.07.004
    [191] Gelderblom M, Leypoldt F, Steinbach K, et al. (2009) Temporal and spatial dynamics of cerebral immune cell accumulation in stroke. Stroke 40: 1849-1857. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534503
    [192] Kleinschnitz C, Kraft P, Dreykluft A, et al. (2013) Regulatory T cells are strong promoters of acute ischemic stroke in mice by inducing dysfunction of the cerebral microvasculature. Blood 121: 679-691. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-426734
    [193] Zhou Y, Xiong KL, Lin S, et al. (2010) Elevation of high-mobility group protein box-1 in serum correlates with severity of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Mediators Inflamm 2010.
    [194] Goldstein RS, Gallowitsch-Puerta M, Yang L, et al. (2006) Elevated high-mobility group box 1 levels in patients with cerebral and myocardial ischemia. Shock 25: 571-574. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000209540.99176.72
    [195] Vogelgesang A, May VE, Grunwald U, et al. (2010) Functional status of peripheral blood T-cells in ischemic stroke patients. PLoS One 5: e8718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008718
    [196] Ramesh G, MacLean AG, Philipp MT (2013) Cytokines and chemokines at the crossroads of neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and neuropathic pain. Mediators Inflamm 2013.
    [197] Moalem G, Tracey DJ (2006) Immune and inflammatory mechanisms in neuropathic pain. Brain Res Rev 51: 240-264. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.11.004
    [198] Coull JA, Beggs S, Boudreau D, et al. (2005) BDNF from microglia causes the shift in neuronal anion gradient underlying neuropathic pain. Nature 438: 1017-1021. doi: 10.1038/nature04223
    [199] Miyoshi K, Obata K, Kondo T, et al. (2008) Interleukin-18-mediated microglia/astrocyte interaction in the spinal cord enhances neuropathic pain processing after nerve injury. J Neurosci 28: 12775-12787. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3512-08.2008
    [200] Binshtok AM, Wang H, Zimmermann K, et al. (2008) Nociceptors are interleukin-1beta sensors. J Neurosci 28: 14062-14073. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-08.2008
    [201] Skoff AM, Zhao C, Adler JE (2009) Interleukin-1alpha regulates substance P expression and release in adult sensory neurons. Exp Neurol 217: 395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.022
    [202] Xu XJ, Hao JX, Andell-Jonsson S, et al. (1997) Nociceptive responses in interleukin-6-deficient mice to peripheral inflammation and peripheral nerve section. Cytokine 9: 1028-1033. doi: 10.1006/cyto.1997.0243
    [203] Dominguez E, Mauborgne A, Mallet J, et al. (2010) SOCS3-mediated blockade of JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway reveals its major contribution to spinal cord neuroinflammation and mechanical allodynia after peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci 30: 5754-5766. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5007-09.2010
    [204] Kim CF, Moalem-Taylor G (2011) Interleukin-17 contributes to neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury in mice. J Pain 12: 370-383.
    [205] Feldman P, Due MR, Ripsch MS, et al. (2012) The persistent release of HMGB1 contributes to tactile hyperalgesia in a rodent model of neuropathic pain. J Neuroinflammation 9: 180.
    [206] Kuang X, Huang Y, Gu HF, et al. (2012) Effects of intrathecal epigallocatechin gallate, an inhibitor of Toll-like receptor 4, on chronic neuropathic pain in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 676: 51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.11.037
    [207] Maeda S, Hikiba Y, Shibata W, et al. (2007) Essential roles of high-mobility group box 1 in the development of murine colitis and colitis-associated cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 360: 394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.06.065
    [208] Otoshi K, Kikuchi S, Kato K, et al. (2011) Anti-HMGB1 neutralization antibody improves pain-related behavior induced by application of autologous nucleus pulposus onto nerve roots in rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36: E692-698. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ecd675
    [209] Shibasaki M, Sasaki M, Miura M, et al. (2010) Induction of high mobility group box-1 in dorsal root ganglion contributes to pain hypersensitivity after peripheral nerve injury. Pain 149: 514-521. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.03.023
    [210] Li W, Li J, Sama AE, et al. (2013) Carbenoxolone blocks endotoxin-induced protein kinase R (PKR) activation and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) release. Mol Med 19: 203-211.
    [211] Devi LA (2000) G-protein-coupled receptor dimers in the lime light. Trends Pharmacol Sci 21: 324-326. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01519-4
    [212] Hanisch UK, Prinz M, Angstwurm K, et al. (2001) The protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG126 prevents the massive microglial cytokine induction by pneumococcal cell walls. Eur J Immunol 31: 2104-2115. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200107)31:7<2104::AID-IMMU2104>3.0.CO;2-3
    [213] Rock RB, Gekker G, Hu S, et al. (2004) Role of microglia in central nervous system infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 17: 942-964. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.942-964.2004
    [214] Saukkonen K, Sande S, Cioffe C, et al. (1990) The role of cytokines in the generation of inflammation and tissue damage in experimental gram-positive meningitis. J Exp Med 171: 439-448. doi: 10.1084/jem.171.2.439
    [215] Zwijnenburg PJ, van der Poll T, Florquin S, et al. (2003) Interleukin-10 negatively regulates local cytokine and chemokine production but does not influence antibacterial host defense during murine pneumococcal meningitis. Infect Immun 71: 2276-2279. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.4.2276-2279.2003
    [216] Ostergaard C, Yieng-Kow R, Larsen C, et al. (2000) Treatment with a monocolonal antibody to IL-8 attenuates the pleocytosis in experimental pneumococcal meningitis in rabbits when given intravenously, but not intracisternally. Clin Exp Immunol 122: 207-211. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01357.x
    [217] Kielian T, Barry B, Hickey WF (2001) CXC Chemokine Receptor-2 Ligands Are Required for Neutrophil-Mediated Host Defense in Experimental Brain Abscesses1. J Immunol 166: 4634-4643. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.7.4634
    [218] Kielian T, Phulwani NK, Esen N, et al. (2007) MyD88-dependent signals are essential for the host immune response in experimental brain abscess. J Immunol 178: 4528-4537. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.7.4528
    [219] Kielian T, Mayes P, Kielian M (2002) Characterization of microglial responses to Staphylococcus aureus: effects on cytokine, costimulatory molecule, and Toll-like receptor expression. J Neuroimmunol 130: 86-99. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00216-3
    [220] Kielian T, Esen N, Bearden ED (2005) Toll‐like receptor 2 (TLR2) is pivotal for recognition of S. aureus peptidoglycan but not intact bacteria by microglia. Glia 49: 567-576.
    [221] Gurley C, Nichols J, Liu S, et al. (2008) Microglia and astrocyte activation by toll-like receptor ligands: modulation by PPAR-agonists. PPAR Res 2008.
    [222] Esen N, Kielian T (2006) Central role for MyD88 in the responses of microglia to pathogen-associated molecular patterns. J Immunol 176: 6802-6811. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.6802
    [223] Baldwin AC, Kielian T (2004) Persistent immune activation associated with a mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus-induced experimental brain abscess. J Neuroimmunol 151: 24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.02.002
    [224] Tang D, Kang R, Cao L, et al. (2008) A pilot study to detect high mobility group box 1 and heat shock protein 72 in cerebrospinal fluid of pediatric patients with meningitis. Crit Care Med 36: 291-295. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295316.86942.CE
    [225] Asano T, Ichiki K, Koizumi S, et al. (2011) High mobility group box 1 in cerebrospinal fluid from several neurological diseases at early time points. Int J Neurosci 121: 480-484. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2011.580868
    [226] Hohne C, Wenzel M, Angele B, et al. (2013) High mobility group box 1 prolongs inflammation and worsens disease in pneumococcal meningitis. Brain 136: 1746-1759. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt064
    [227] Hemmi H, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, et al. (2000) A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature 408: 740-745. doi: 10.1038/35047123
    [228] Koedel U (2009) Toll-like receptors in bacterial meningitis. Toll-like Receptors: Roles in Infection and Neuropathology. Springer. pp. 15-40.
    [229] Sanders MS, van Well GT, Ouburg S, et al. (2012) Toll-like receptor 9 polymorphisms are associated with severity variables in a cohort of meningococcal meningitis survivors. BMC Infect Dis 12: 112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-112
    [230] Alleva LM, Yang H, Tracey KJ, et al. (2005) High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein: possible amplification signal in the pathogenesis of falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 99: 171-174. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.06.008
    [231] Mostofa AG, Punganuru SR, Madala HR, et al. (2017) The Process and Regulatory Components of Inflammation in Brain Oncogenesis. Biomolecules 7: 34. doi: 10.3390/biom7020034
    [232] Albulescu R, Codrici E, Popescu ID, et al. (2013) Cytokine patterns in brain tumour progression. Mediators Inflamm 2013: 979748.
    [233] Goswami S, Gupta A, Sharma SK (1998) Interleukin-6-mediated autocrine growth promotion in human glioblastoma multiforme cell line U87MG. J Neurochem 71: 1837-1845.
    [234] Brat DJ, Bellail AC, Van Meir EG (2005) The role of interleukin-8 and its receptors in gliomagenesis and tumoral angiogenesis. Neuro Oncol 7: 122-133. doi: 10.1215/S1152851704001061
    [235] Yoshida S, Ono M, Shono T, et al. (1997) Involvement of interleukin-8, vascular endothelial growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor in tumor necrosis factor alpha-dependent angiogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 17: 4015-4023. doi: 10.1128/MCB.17.7.4015
    [236] Tanabe K, Matsushima-Nishiwaki R, Yamaguchi S, et al. (2010) Mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced interleukin-6 synthesis in glioma cells. J Neuroinflammation 7: 16.
    [237] Ghosh S, Paul A, Sen E (2013) Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-Induced Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α–β-Catenin Axis Regulates Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Gene Activation through Chromatin Remodeling. Mol Cell Biol 33: 2718-2731. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01254-12
    [238] Hao C, Parney IF, Roa WH, et al. (2002) Cytokine and cytokine receptor mRNA expression in human glioblastomas: evidence of Th1, Th2 and Th3 cytokine dysregulation. Acta Neuropathol 103: 171-178. doi: 10.1007/s004010100448
    [239] Grauer O, Poschl P, Lohmeier A, et al. (2007) Toll-like receptor triggered dendritic cell maturation and IL-12 secretion are necessary to overcome T-cell inhibition by glioma-associated TGF-beta2. J Neurooncol 82: 151-161. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9274-2
    [240] Calandra T, Roger T (2003) Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 3: 791-800. doi: 10.1038/nri1200
    [241] Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, et al. (2008) Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 454: 436-444. doi: 10.1038/nature07205
    [242] Apte RN, Dotan S, Elkabets M, et al. (2006) The involvement of IL-1 in tumorigenesis, tumor invasiveness, metastasis and tumor-host interactions. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25: 387-408. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-9004-4
    [243] Martins I, Kepp O, Menger L, et al. (2013) Fluorescent biosensors for the detection of HMGB1 release. Methods Mol Biol 1004: 43-56. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-383-1_4
    [244] Zhang J, Liu C, Hou R (2014) Knockdown of HMGB1 improves apoptosis and suppresses proliferation and invasion of glioma cells. Chin J Cancer Res 26: 658-668.
    [245] Kostova N, Zlateva S, Ugrinova I, et al. (2010) The expression of HMGB1 protein and its receptor RAGE in human malignant tumors. Mol Cell Biochem 337: 251-258. doi: 10.1007/s11010-009-0305-0
    [246] Seidu RA, Wu M, Su Z, et al. (2017) Paradoxical Role of High Mobility Group Box 1 in Glioma: A Suppressor or a Promoter? Oncol Rev 11: 325.
    [247] Jube S, Rivera ZS, Bianchi ME, et al. (2012) Cancer cell secretion of the DAMP protein HMGB1 supports progression in malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Res 72: 3290-3301. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3481
    [248] Yang GL, Zhang LH, Bo JJ, et al. (2012) Increased expression of HMGB1 is associated with poor prognosis in human bladder cancer. J Surg Oncol 106: 57-61. doi: 10.1002/jso.23040
    [249] Kim JB, Lim CM, Yu YM, et al. (2008) Induction and subcellular localization of high‐mobility group box–1 (HMGB1) in the postischemic rat brain. J Neurosci Res 86: 1125-1131. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21555
    [250] Jones KA, Thomsen C (2013) The role of the innate immune system in psychiatric disorders. Mol Cell Neurosci 53: 52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2012.10.002
    [251] Frank MG, Weber MD, Watkins LR, et al. (2016) Stress-induced neuroinflammatory priming: A liability factor in the etiology of psychiatric disorders. Neurobiol Stress 4: 62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2015.12.004
    [252] Dantzer R, O'Connor JC, Freund GG, et al. (2008) From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 46-56. doi: 10.1038/nrn2297
    [253] Johnson JD, Campisi J, Sharkey CM, et al. (2005) Catecholamines mediate stress-induced increases in peripheral and central inflammatory cytokines. Neuroscience 135: 1295-1307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.090
    [254] Weber MD, Frank MG, Sobesky JL, et al. (2013) Blocking toll-like receptor 2 and 4 signaling during a stressor prevents stress-induced priming of neuroinflammatory responses to a subsequent immune challenge. Brain Behav Immun 32: 112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.03.004
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. IMTIAZ AHMAD, ASMIDAR ABU BAKAR, HIJAZ AHMAD, AZIZ KHAN, THABET ABDELJAWAD, INVESTIGATING VIRUS SPREAD ANALYSIS IN COMPUTER NETWORKS WITH ATANGANA–BALEANU FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE MODELS, 2024, 32, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X24400437
    2. Muhammad Nawaz Khan, Imtiaz Ahmad, Mehnaz Shakeel, Rashid Jan, Fractional calculus analysis: investigating Drinfeld-Sokolov-Wilson system and Harry Dym equations via meshless procedures, 2024, 4, 2767-8946, 86, 10.3934/mmc.2024008
    3. Saima Noor, Haifa A Alyousef, Ahmad Shafee, Rasool Shah, Samir A El-Tantawy, A novel analytical technique for analyzing the (3+1)-dimensional fractional calogero- bogoyavlenskii-schiff equation: investigating solitary/shock waves and many others physical phenomena, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 065257, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad49d9
    4. Tariq Q. S. Abdullah, Gang Huang, Wadhah Al-Sadi, Yasser Aboelmagd, Wael Mobarak, Fractional Dynamics of Cassava Mosaic Disease Model with Recovery Rate Using New Proposed Numerical Scheme, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 2386, 10.3390/math12152386
    5. Zakieh Avazzadeh, Hossein Hassani, Mohammad Javad Ebadi, Ali Bayati Eshkaftaki, Roghayeh Katani, Alireza Rezvani, Generalization of Bernoulli polynomials to find optimal solution of fractional hematopoietic stem cells model, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 085015, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad5e44
    6. Abdulrahman Obaid Alshammari, Imtiaz Ahmad, Rashid Jan, Sahar Ahmed Idris, Fractional-calculus analysis of the dynamics of CD4+
    T cells and human immunodeficiency viruses, 2024, 1951-6355, 10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01192-5
    7. Imtiaz Ahmad, Ihteram Ali, Rashid Jan, Sahar Ahmed Idris, Mohamed Mousa, Muhammad Nadeem, Solutions of a three-dimensional multi-term fractional anomalous solute transport model for contamination in groundwater, 2023, 18, 1932-6203, e0294348, 10.1371/journal.pone.0294348
    8. Imtiaz Ahmad, Asmidar Abu Bakar, Rashid Jan, Salman Yussof, Dynamic behaviors of a modified computer virus model: Insights into parameters and network attributes, 2024, 103, 11100168, 266, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.06.009
    9. Imtiaz Ahmad, Ibrahim Mekawy, Muhammad Nawaz Khan, Rashid Jan, Salah Boulaaras, Modeling anomalous transport in fractal porous media: A study of fractional diffusion PDEs using numerical method, 2024, 13, 2192-8029, 10.1515/nleng-2022-0366
    10. Rashid Jan, Normy Norfiza Abdul Razak, Sania Qureshi, Imtiaz Ahmad, Salma Bahramand, Modeling Rift Valley fever transmission: insights from fractal-fractional dynamics with the Caputo derivative, 2024, 4, 2767-8946, 163, 10.3934/mmc.2024015
    11. Ziad Ur Rehman, Salah Boulaaras, Rashid Jan, Imtiaz Ahmad, Salma Bahramand, Computational analysis of financial system through non-integer derivative, 2024, 75, 18777503, 102204, 10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102204
    12. Parvaiz Ahmad Naik, Muhammad Farman, Anum Zehra, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Evren Hincal, Analysis and modeling with fractal-fractional operator for an epidemic model with reference to COVID-19 modeling, 2024, 10, 26668181, 100663, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100663
    13. Shiv Mangal, Preeti Deolia, O. P. Misra, Joydip Dhar, Vijay Shankar Sharma, Modeling spread and control of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in India, 2024, 139, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05639-5
    14. Nnaemeka Stanley Aguegboh, Walter Okongo, Diallo Boubacar, Munkaila Dasumani, Kingsley Chinedu Nnamaga, Daniel Ugochukwu Nnaji, Netochukwu Onyiaji, Anthonia Uchenna Nwachukwu, A novel approach to modeling malaria with treatment and vaccination as control strategies in Africa using the Atangana–Baleanu derivative, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02273-z
    15. Zhanhao Liang, Kadyrkulova Kyial Kudayberdievna, Guijun wu, Zhantu Liang, Batyrkanov Jenish Isakunovich, Wei Xiong, Wei Meng, Yukai Li, Co-evolution model of traffic travel and disease transmission under limited resources, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-93433-3
    16. Biplab Dhar, Mohammad Sajid, Mathematical analysis of scrub typhus seasonal infection with re-scaled transmission rate considering Northeast India reported data from 2010 to 2022, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-95548-z
    17. Muhammad Aon Raza, Fekadu Tesgera Agama, Sobia Sultana, Saima Rashid, Mohammed Shaaf Alharthi, Multistability bifurcation analysis and transmission pathways for the dynamics of the infectious disease-cholera model with microbial expansion inducing the Allee effect in terms of Guassian noise and crossover effects, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-89286-5
    18. Biplab Dhar, Mohammad Sajid, Jianguo Wang, On improving public health after COVID-19 epidemic: A fractal-fractional mathematical solutions with short memory effect and efficient optimal strategies, 2025, 20, 1932-6203, e0321195, 10.1371/journal.pone.0321195
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(7802) PDF downloads(1254) Cited by(7)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog