Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Mechanical properties of sandwich composite made of syntactic foam core and GFRP skins

1 Centre for Future Materials (CFM) and School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia
2 University Kuala Lumpur, Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, 32200, Lumut, Perak, Malaysia
3 Division of Materials Science, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798

Topical Section: Advanced composites

Sandwich composites or sandwich panels have been widely used as potential materials or building structures and are regarded as a lightweight material for marine applications. In particular, the mechanical properties, such as the compressive, tensile and flexural behaviour, of sandwich composites formed from glass fibre sheets used as the skin and glass microballoon/vinyl ester as the syntactic foam core were investigated in this report. This syntactic foam core is sandwiched between unidirectional glass fibre reinforced plastic (GFRP) using vinyl ester resins to build high performance sandwich panels. The results show that the compressive and tensile strengths decrease when the glass microballoon content is increased in syntactic foam core of sandwich panels. Moreover, compressive modulus is also found to be decreased, and there is no trend for tensile modulus. Meanwhile, the flexural stiffness and effective flexural stiffness for edgewise position have a higher bending as 50% and 60%, respectively. Furthermore, the results indicated that the glass microballoon mixed in a vinyl ester should be controlled to obtain a good combination of the tensile, compressive and flexural strength properties.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords syntactic foam; composite sandwich panel; glass microballoon; resin; tensile; flexural

Citation: Zulzamri Salleh, Md Mainul Islam, Jayantha Ananda Epaarachchi, Haibin Su. Mechanical properties of sandwich composite made of syntactic foam core and GFRP skins. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(4): 1704-1727. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.4.1704

References

  • 1. Klempner D, Sendijarevic V (2004) Handbook of polymeric foams and foam technology, Munich, Germany: Carl HandserVerlag.
  • 2. Khemani KC (1997) Polymer Foams: An Overview. Polymeric Foams. ACS Symposium Series, Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
  • 3. Zenkert D (1995) An introduction to sandwich constructions. Engineering materials advisory services, London.
  • 4. Allen H (1969) Analysis and design of structural sandwich plates: Franklin Book Co.
  • 5. Gay D, Hoa S (2007) Composite materials: design and applications. 2nd Eds, Taylor & Francis group, LLC.
  • 6. Quilter A (2006) Composites in aerospace applications. ESDU International. Canada: An IHS White Paper.
  • 7. Johnson CF, Rudd C (1998) Manufacturing process selection for composite components, Cambridge Press.
  • 8. Tagliavia G, Porfiri M, Gupta N (2009) Vinyl ester-glass hollow particle composites: dynamic mechanical properties at high inclusion volume fraction. J Compos Mater 43: 561–582.    
  • 9. Shen SY, Masters FJ, Upjohn HL, et al. (2013) Mechanical resistance properties of FRP/polyol-isocyanate foam sandwich panels. Compos Struct 99: 419–432.    
  • 10. Mostafa A, Shankar K, Morozov EV (2013) Insight into the shear behaviour of composite sandwich panels with foam core. Mater Design 50: 92–101.    
  • 11. Salleh Z, Islam M, Ku H (2014) Study on Compressive Properties of Syntactic Foams for Marine Applications. J Multifunctional Compos 2: 21–27.    
  • 12. Gupta N, Priya S, Islam R, et al. (2006) Characterization of mechanical and electrical properties of epoxy-glass microballoon syntactic composites. Ferroelectrics 345: 1–12.    
  • 13. Wouterson EM, Boey FYC, Hu X, et al. (2007) Effect of fiber reinforcement on the tensile, fracture and thermal properties of syntactic foam. Polymer 48: 3183–3191.    
  • 14. Shankar R, Sankaran S (2005) Short beam three point bend tests in syntactic foams. Part I: Microscopic characterization of the failure zones. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 673–679.
  • 15. Karthikeyan C, Sankaran S, Kumar M, et al. (2001) Processing and compressive strengths of syntactic foams with and without fibrous reinforcements. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 405–411.    
  • 16. Wouterson E, Boey F, Hu X, et al. (2004) Fracture and impact toughness of syntactic foam. J Cell Plast 40: 145–154.    
  • 17. Bardella L, Genna F (2001) Elastic design of syntactic foamed sandwiches obtained by filling of three-dimensional sandwich-fabric panels. Int J Solids Struct 38: 307–333.    
  • 18. Bardella L, Genna F (2001) On the elastic behavior of syntactic foams. Int J Solids Struct 38: 7235–7260.    
  • 19. Sagi-Mana D, Narkis M, Siegmann A, et al. (1998) The effect of marine environment on a vinyl ester resin and its highly filled particulate quartz composites. J Appl Polym Sci 69: 2229–2234.
  • 20. Rajapakse Y, Hui D (2008) Marine composites and sandwich structures. Compos Part B-Eng 39: 1–4.
  • 21. Rajapakse Y, Hui D (2004) Marine composites: foreword. Compos Part B-Eng 35: 447–450.    
  • 22. Fam A, Sharaf T (2010) Flexural performance of sandwich panels comprising polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations. Compos Struct 92: 2927–2935.    
  • 23. Cheng Q, Lee H, Lu C (2006) A numerical analysis approach for evaluating elastic constants of sandwich structures with various cores. Compos Struct 74: 226–236.    
  • 24. Sharaf T, Shawkat W, Fam A (2010) Structural performance of sandwich wall panels with different foam core densities in one-way bending. J Compos Mater 44: 2249–2263.    
  • 25. Islam MM, Kim HS (2007) Novel syntactic foams made of ceramic hollow micro-spheres and starch: theory, structure and properties. J Mater Sci 42: 6123–6132.    
  • 26. Awad ZK, Aravinthan T, Manalo A (2012) Geometry effect on the behaviour of single and glue-laminated glass fibre reinforced polymer composite sandwich beams loaded in four-point bending. Mater Design 39: 93–103.    
  • 27. Zhang J, Kikuchi N, Li V, et al. (1996) Constitutive model of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading. Int J Impact Eng 21: 369–386.
  • 28. Maji A, Schreyer H, Donald S, et al. (1995) Mechanical properties of polyurethane-foam impact limiters. J Eng Mech 121: 528–540.    
  • 29. Ranade A, Hiltner A, Baer E, et al. (2004) Structure–property relationship in coextruded foam/film microlayers. J Cell Plast 40: 497–507.    
  • 30. Wouterson E, Boey F, Hu X, et al. (2005) Specific properties and fracture toughness of syntactic foam:effect of foam microstructures. Compos Sci Technol 65: 1840–1850.    
  • 31. Ruan D, Lu G, Chen F, et al. (2002) Compressive behavior of aluminum foams at low and medium strain rates. Compos Struct 57: 331–336.
  • 32. Sheng H, Gang Z (1999) The mechanical behavior of foamed aluminium. J Mater Sci 34: 291–299.    
  • 33. Avalle M, Belingardi G, Ibba A (2007) Mechanical models of cellular solids: parameters identification from experimental tests. Int J Impact Eng 34: 3–27.    
  • 34. Ashby M (1983) The mechanical properties of cellular solids. Metall Mater Trans A 14: 1755–1769.    
  • 35. Peroni L, Avalle M, Peroni M (2008) The mechanical behavior of aluminum foam structures in different loading conditions. Int J Impact Eng 35: 644–658.    
  • 36. Gupta N, Ye R, Porfiri M (2010) Comparison of tensile and compressive characteristics of vinyl ester/glass microballoon syntactic foams. Compos Part B-Eng 41: 236–245.    
  • 37. Viot P, Beani F, Lataillade J (2005) Polymeric foam behavior under dynamic compressive loading. J Mater Sci 40: 5829–5837.    
  • 38. Lin H (1997) The structure and property relationships of commercial foamed plastics. Polym Test 16: 429–443.    
  • 39. Nambiar E, Ramamurthy K (2007) Air-void characterization of foam concrete. Cement Concrete Res 37: 221–330.    
  • 40. ASTM C297/C297M-04 (2004) Standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions, USA.
  • 41. Cai K (2010) Effects of the Properties of Bi-modulus Material on Stiffness Design. Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), 2010 International Conference on. IEEE 2: 192–195.
  • 42. Maharsia R, Gupta N, Jerro HD (2006) Investigation of flexural strength properties of rubber and nanoclay reinforced hybrid syntactic foams. Mat Sci Eng A 417: 249–258.    
  • 43. ASTM D790-03 PA (2003) Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforcedand Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials, USA: ASTM International.
  • 44. ASTM C393/C393M (2012) Standard Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure., West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959, USA: ASTM International.
  • 45. Manalo AC, Aravinthan T, Karunasena W (2010) Flexural behaviour of glue-laminated fibre composite sandwich beams. Compos Struct 92: 2703–2711.    
  • 46. Gupta N, Karthikeyan CS, Kishore SSa (1999) Correlation of processing methodology to the physical and mechanical properties of syntactic foams with and without fibers. Mater Charact 43: 271–277.    
  • 47. Azimi H, Pearson R, Herztberg R (1996) Polymer Engineering Science.

 

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

Copyright Info: © 2016, Md Mainul Islam, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved